EU RES-Targets â A Generator's View - KU Leuven
EU RES-Targets â A Generator's View - KU Leuven
EU RES-Targets â A Generator's View - KU Leuven
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>EU</strong> <strong>RES</strong>-<strong>Targets</strong> – A Generator’s <strong>View</strong><br />
Energie-Instituut K.U.<strong>Leuven</strong> - 3 th December 2008<br />
1
Shareholders<br />
Note: Centrica announced it has the intention to buy the GdF shares<br />
2
Facts & Figures<br />
Turnover : 2.200 million €<br />
Installed capacity: 1.600 MW<br />
Employees : +/- 1.000 Generation in Belgium : 9 %<br />
Supply to customers :<br />
Power 12 TWh<br />
Gas 15 TWh<br />
Market share in Belgium :<br />
Power 15 %<br />
Gas 8 %<br />
1,5 million customers<br />
3
Sites<br />
Chooz<br />
4
Conventional plants<br />
CCGT Plants<br />
929 MW<br />
OCGT Plants<br />
336 MW<br />
Seraing 462 MW<br />
Gent Ringvaart 357 MW<br />
Angleur 3 110 MW<br />
Ringvaart<br />
Gent Ham 3 116 MW<br />
Angleur 4 128 MW<br />
Monsin 2 70 MW<br />
Izegem 22 MW<br />
Ham<br />
5
Cogeneration<br />
Gent Ham – 54 MW (1994)<br />
GE LM 6000<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HRSG without additional firing<br />
District heating network Gent<br />
First LM6000 DLE worldwide<br />
Fleetleader LM6000 DLE<br />
> 90.000 operating hours<br />
Izegem – 22 MW (1996)<br />
GE LM 2500<br />
<br />
<br />
HRSG with additional firing<br />
> 84.000 operating hours<br />
Taminco Gent – 6 MW (2009)<br />
Gasturbine Solar Taurus 65<br />
<br />
HRSG with additional firing<br />
6
Renewable Energy<br />
Ieper (5 MW)<br />
Gent (22 MW)<br />
Melle (6 MW)<br />
Berloz (9 MW)<br />
Eghezée (18 MW)<br />
Fernelmont (6 MW)<br />
Lobbes (15 MW) Floreffe (14 MW)<br />
Thuin (24 MW)<br />
Verlaine (10 MW)<br />
Villers-Le-Bouillet (9 MW)<br />
Wanze (3 MW)<br />
Dinant (12 MW)<br />
Operational 55 MW<br />
Construction 26 MW<br />
Permitted 33 MW<br />
Development 100+ MW<br />
Walcourt (9 MW)<br />
Ciney (18 MW)<br />
7
Renewable Energy : others<br />
Biomass (87 MW)<br />
Harelbeke (diesel engines)<br />
Hydro power (65 MW)<br />
Along the Meuse river<br />
Biogas (4 MW)<br />
<br />
<br />
Ehein (3 MW)<br />
Hallembaye (1 MW)<br />
8
Navagne CCGT – 860 MW – decision 2009<br />
9
<strong>EU</strong> Climate Package<br />
<strong>EU</strong> view<br />
Integrated market<br />
Target : on demand – coherent with market approach<br />
Macro-economic approach : reaching targets at least marginal cost → in<br />
cheapest back yard<br />
BUT…<br />
• Burden sharing based on linear share and weighted by GDP/capita !<br />
• Limited or rather no flexibility allowed, unless bilateral agreements between<br />
member states ?<br />
• Potential assessment taken into account for burden sharing ?<br />
10
<strong>EU</strong> Climate Package<br />
Member state view<br />
Bigger member states more potential – prefer to keep subsidies local ?<br />
Smaller member states penalised ? Especially those with higher<br />
GDP/capita ?<br />
Extra cost estimated at about 20 billion €<br />
Local benefits → ‘Of course, in my back yard !’<br />
• Employment<br />
• Fuel independency<br />
• Knowledge – know how – technology<br />
11
<strong>EU</strong> Climate Package<br />
Industry<br />
International competition → international flexibility<br />
If not : ‘Help we have to pay !’ → Exemptions ?<br />
Households<br />
Limited impact ?<br />
Does he care ?<br />
‘Not in my back yard !’<br />
Anyhow : in one way or another – costumer pays<br />
12
<strong>EU</strong> Climate Package<br />
Generator’s view<br />
Regulatory driven as long as more expensive than conventional !<br />
Potential ?<br />
• Wind<br />
• Sun : heat – PV<br />
• Water<br />
• Biomass : other impacts (sustainability, NOx, Dust,…)<br />
• Geothermal<br />
• Tidal<br />
• …<br />
Technology ?<br />
• Existing and mature<br />
• Prototype<br />
• Technology break through ?<br />
‘Small’ local vs internationally integrated player ? ‘YES – in my local<br />
resp. international back yard !’<br />
13
<strong>EU</strong> Climate Package<br />
SPE’s view<br />
Local integrated player<br />
Challenging targets<br />
• NIMBY – BANANA<br />
• Potential in Belgium ?<br />
• Burden sharing within Belgium ?<br />
• Burden sharing between transport – electricity – heat ?<br />
• Internal flexibility ?<br />
Biomass : mainly import ! Logistics ? Sustainability ? Other<br />
environmental impacts than CO 2 ?<br />
<strong>RES</strong><br />
• 12% of installed capacity in Belgium<br />
• On average 1 to 2 wind turbines additionally per month in Belgium<br />
CO 2<br />
• 300 g/MWh<br />
• Are RUE and <strong>RES</strong> the only answer to CO 2<br />
-reduction ?<br />
14
Change language