28.04.2014 Views

pdf file

pdf file

pdf file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proof.<br />

We show the following statements by graphical calculations:<br />

• The above definition indeed defines H-coactions on V ∗ .<br />

• The coaction defined with S −1 has the property that the right evaluation and right coevaluation<br />

are morphisms of H-comodules. The statement that the coaction defined with<br />

S on the left dual is compatible with left evaluation and coevaluation follows in complete<br />

analogy.<br />

• The left and right dual actions and coactions obey the Yetter-Drinfeld axiom.<br />

This raises the question whether for any given Hopf algebra H the category H HYD can be<br />

seen as the category of left modules over a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra D(H).<br />

Observation 4.5.6.<br />

1. To investigate this in more detail, assume that the Hopf algebra H is finite-dimensional<br />

and recall from example 2.2.8.1 that a coaction of H then amounts to an action of H ∗ .<br />

Thus the quasi-triangular Hopf algebra D(H) should account for an action of H and H ∗ .<br />

If the two actions would commute, H ∗ ⊗ H with the product structure for algebra and<br />

coalgebra would be an obvious candidate. This is not the case, and we have to encode the<br />

Yetter-Drinfeld condition in the product on D(H).<br />

2. It will be convenient to consider a slightly different category H YD H of Yetter-Drinfeld<br />

modules: these are triples (V, ρ V , Δ V ) such that<br />

• (V, ρ V ) is a unital left A-module.<br />

• (V, Δ V ) is a counital right A-comodule:<br />

Δ V : V → V ⊗ H<br />

v ↦→ v (V ) ⊗ v (H)<br />

• The Yetter-Drinfeld condition holds in the form<br />

h (1) .v (V ) ⊗ h (2) ∙ v (H) = (h (2) .v) (V ) ⊗ (h (2) .v) (H) ∙ h (1) .<br />

Morphisms of Yetter-Drinfeld modules in H YD H are morphisms of left modules and right<br />

comodules.<br />

This observation leads to the following definition:<br />

Definition 4.5.7<br />

Let H be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra. Endow the vector space D(H) := H ∗ ⊗ H<br />

• with the structure of a counital coalgebra using the tensor product structure, i.e. for<br />

f ∈ H ∗ and a ∈ H, we have<br />

ɛ(f ⊗ a) := ɛ(a)f(1)<br />

Δ(f ⊗ a) := (f (1) ⊗ a (1) ) ⊗ (f (2) ⊗ a (2) )<br />

This encodes the fact that the tensor product of Yetter-Drinfeld modules is the ordinary<br />

tensor product of modules and comodules.<br />

108<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!