29.04.2014 Views

1 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

1 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

1 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

DESIGN OF THE STUDY<br />

The fieldwork of the study started mid 1987 and ended two years<br />

later. The sample consisted of 150 hard drug users. Respondents were<br />

recruited from the hard-core of the Amsterdam (street) junkie scene. In<br />

line with popula.tion estimates, the sample was divided so that two-thirds<br />

of the subjects were ambulant methadone maintenance clients. The remainder<br />

were not involved in methadone prescription. The first subsample was<br />

randomly approached on the premises of the methadone maintenance agencies,<br />

while th~ second subsample was recruited by snowballing techniques, mainly<br />

starting in the drugs area of Amsterdam. The deoign allowed for a maximum<br />

of seven interviews, over a period of about 13 months, about drug taking<br />

and ecol'lomic behavior. All standard interviews referred retrospectively to<br />

the preceding seven days. :The first three interviews took place in the<br />

first three weeks, the next four quart·erly3. Respondents were interviewed<br />

in a fieldstation, a bar or -depending on the weather- on a bench in the<br />

street.<br />

In addition to quantitati,re information, a life history interview was<br />

conducted. Respondents were asked about their family backgrounds, peer<br />

group, criminal and drug careers and their motivation to preserve their<br />

deviant lifestyles. The fieldworkers a.nd researchers also spent considerable<br />

time observing the daily activities on the streets of central Amsterdam.<br />

The experiences and observations were recorded in a personal diary.<br />

The design of the study is much alike the Johnson et al study,<br />

conducted in New York (Johnson et al, 1985). The major differ~nces are the<br />

number of and time interval between the interviews and the. emphasis on<br />

389 respondents completed the interview cycle.<br />

224 •<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!