1 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SHARING DRUG USE BEHAVIOR SA vs. OA 1989-90, Sacto. , CA SA OA P (N=118) (N=421) Shares Needles 98 (83%) 312 (74%) .05 Never shares 18 (15%) 105 (25%) .05 Shares with: Prim. Sex. Part. 28 (29%) 171 (55%) .01 Other Sex. Part. 18 (18%) 24 (8%) .01 Fam/friends 50 (51%) 171 (55%) ns strangers 28 (29%) 57 (18%) .01 Avg. # shared with: Other Sex. Part. 8.26 2.58 ns Fam/friends 5.08 2.50 .01 Strangers 11. 07 3.42 .07 DISINFECTION Disinfects needle 73/98 (74%) 264/312 (84%) .01 Never disinfects 25 (25%) 48 (15%) .01 DRUG TREATMENT SA vs. OA 1989-90, sacto., CA SA OA P (N=118) (N=421) Never, not. now 18 (15%) 7 (1%) .01 Never before 67 (57%) 110 (26%) .01 Avg. prevo admits 2.84 4.43 .01 Avg. time spent 9.09 months 14.67 months ns In drug tx now 88 (75%) 406 (96%) .01 257
SEXUAL PARTNERS (SP) - CHARACTERISTICS SA vs. OA 1989-90, Sacto. , CA SA (N=118) OA (N=421) Has Primary SP (PSP) 65 (55%) 291 (69%) PSP is IDU 28/65 (43%) 184/291 (63%) PSP tested for HIV 26 (40%) 137 (47%) PSP positive 1/26 (4%) 2/137 (1.5%) DK PSP's result 4 (15%) 28 (20%) Time with PSP Average 4.25 years 6.40 years < 1 year 25 (38%) 46 (16%) > 10 years 5 (8%) 62 (21%) Average # of SPs: past 1 year 15.71 11.66 Sex with HIV+ 4 (3%) 6 (1%) SEXUAL BEHAVIOR SA vs. OA 1989-90, Sacto. , CA SA (N=118) OA (N=421) Anal sex 58 ( 49%) 81 (19%) Women 30/57 (49%) 50/198 (25%) Men 28/61 (46%) 31/223 (14%) >1 SP - past year 70 (59%) 13J.. (31%) Sex/Etoh - past year 60 (51%) 125 (30%) avg. # times 61.48 35.28 Paid sex for $/drugs 23 (19%) 61.- .;) (15%) Paid $/drug for sex 20 (17%) 12 (3%) Uses condoms 37 (31%) 103 (25%) 258 P .01 .01 .05 ns ns .05 .01 .01 .01 ns P .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .05 ns .01 ns • I 91 \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-
Page 1 and 2:
If you have issues viewing or acces
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PREFACE EXE
Page 5 and 6:
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Page 7 and 8:
users of cocaine has gone steadily
Page 9 and 10:
Sacramento has become the methamphe
Page 11 and 12:
procedures. Our survey has examined
Page 13 and 14:
at the number of caretakers they ha
Page 15 and 16:
parole caseloads. Those coming out
Page 17 and 18:
Resource distribution is fraught wi
Page 19 and 20:
examine the data systems in existen
Page 21 and 22:
We take a different policy approach
Page 23 and 24:
ecause of the geographic distance.
Page 25 and 26:
Susan Pennell - San Diego Kiku Anno
Page 27 and 28:
DRUG ABUSE INFORMATION AND MONITORI
Page 29 and 30:
Mary Ann Lewis UCLA School of Nursi
Page 31 and 32:
COMMUNITY EPIDEMIOLOGY WORK GROUP I
Page 33 and 34:
HIGHLIGHTS The following highlights
Page 35 and 36:
HlghUghu • In Hawaii, dc2ths rela
Page 37 and 38:
~~~-----.---- () ~ C) W 8 [.., .. ~
Page 39 and 40:
COCAINE 1 . Eastern Region EXECUTIV
Page 41 and 42:
______________ Eu_CUl_ive_S~,JlU'Y:
Page 43 and 44:
CIty .... . eta .'.I\;·~·:iil::;:
Page 45 and 46:
In Chicago crack cocaine use is wid
Page 47 and 48:
In San Diego, whites accounted for
Page 49 and 50:
EuCUlive Summary: CocoiM V'''''''''
Page 51 and 52:
wClilive Summary: Heroin The' numbe
Page 53 and 54:
EuCUlive Summary: Heroin cocaine us
Page 55 and 56:
Eucwive SIIntI1ID1y: lIeroin combin
Page 57 and 58:
Area C~Ofado Hon04uJu Los AnGeles P
Page 59 and 60:
following an increase; aVailability
Page 61 and 62:
Ex.eClllive Summary: Marijuana TabI
Page 63 and 64:
Eucutive Summary: Marijuana Table 2
Page 65 and 66:
EuCUl;ve SIllTllM1'Y: Marijuana ---
Page 67 and 68:
Typically, metharnphetanrine ER men
Page 69 and 70:
Table 29. Pwcentsgo and rri by nOl'
Page 71 and 72:
mentions-the leading mentioned psyc
Page 73 and 74:
with cigarette papers, and sold as
Page 75 and 76:
----------------------~- ~~--~-~~--
Page 77 and 78:
APPENDIX D DRUG/LAB SEIZURE ACTIVIT
Page 79 and 80:
BNE DRUG SEIZURE ACTIVITY REPORT '-
Page 81 and 82:
"'Other Labs include: , Designer Dr
Page 83 and 84:
. I OMBNo. ADMS Fonn 08 State: TR
Page 85 and 86:
BNE Drug Seizure Activity Report 19
Page 87 and 88:
(Xl c: LSD SEIZURE ACTIVITY REPORT
Page 89 and 90:
LAB SEIZURE ACTIVITY REPORT 00 P- "
Page 91 and 92:
'DE/! 'D~ ()~ February, 1991 NIJ f
Page 93 and 94:
';et:Weat 7~ 'P~ 00 co I I CSA PEN.
Page 95 and 96:
May 25, 1988 June 23, 1985 Aug. 31,
Page 97 and 98:
.: ".:.: Heroin Cocaine Marijuana H
Page 99 and 100:
----~-~---~~-~----- ~ VI o EXHIBIT
Page 101 and 102:
9,500 EXHIBIT 8 LOS ANGELES HEROIN
Page 103 and 104:
...... VI 00 EXHIBiT 10 LOS ANGELES
Page 105 and 106:
Exhibit 3 DRUG TREATMENT ADMISSIONS
Page 107 and 108:
YEAR 1998 1989 1990 1991 1992 QUART
Page 109 and 110:
APPENDIX G I • TRENDS EOR DRIIG A
Page 111 and 112:
County Reports: San Diego, Californ
Page 113 and 114:
County Repons: San Diego, Californi
Page 115 and 116:
County Repons: San Diego. Californi
Page 117 and 118:
EXHIBIT 1 ADMISSIONS TO COUNTY FUND
Page 119 and 120:
EXHIBIT 3 COCAINE TREATMENT ADMISSI
Page 121 and 122:
EXHIBIT 5 AMPHETAMINE TREATMENT ADM
Page 123 and 124:
EXHIBIT 7 ALCOHOL ADMISSIONS TO COU
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIXH High Risk Alcohol and Dru
Page 127 and 128:
Findings Trends in Risk Categories
Page 129 and 130:
Frequent and Heavy Use by User Grou
Page 131 and 132:
Cigarette Smoking and User Groups T
Page 133 and 134:
Use of Tobacco, Alcohol and Illicit
Page 135 and 136:
Survey Instrument The questionnaire
Page 137 and 138:
10 9 CI) 8 c: Q) Q) I- 7 ;;;: ....
Page 139 and 140:
75 70 III 65 c: Q) ~ 60 < 55 "- ...
Page 141 and 142:
57.4% increase in those who had use
Page 143 and 144:
- - - - - - - -. - - - - - ------ T
Page 145 and 146:
FIGURE 7 Drinking to Intoxication A
Page 147 and 148:
drugs (such as cocaine, LSD, amphet
Page 149 and 150:
Apparently, older friends are a sig
Page 151 and 152:
drugs (Table 8). Since our survey i
Page 153 and 154:
All of the options for drinking loc
Page 155 and 156:
students' I\eports regarding fighti
Page 157 and 158:
TABLE 13 Situations of Teens' Drug
Page 159 and 160:
Yolo County teens, the lifetime pre
Page 161 and 162:
APPENDIX I DRUG USE FORECASTING (DU
Page 163 and 164:
--------------- Introduction I •
Page 165 and 166:
Drug Use Excluding Marijuana • A
Page 167 and 168:
30 10 Figure 5 DUF ADULT AMPHETAMIN
Page 169 and 170:
Arrest Charge and Drug Result For t
Page 171 and 172:
Table 2 ARREST CHARGE AND DRUG RESU
Page 173 and 174:
"E \I) u iii Q. Figure 9 DUF ADULT
Page 175 and 176:
CP ~ 'iii 0 Q.. C CP !: (I) Q.. 20
Page 177 and 178:
Nationwide DUF Site Comparison Alth
Page 179 and 180:
Why San Diego maintains higher rate
Page 181 and 182:
County Alameda Amador Butte Calaver
Page 183 and 184:
San Luis Obispo $13.921 San Mateo S
Page 185 and 186:
COUNTY MASTER PLAN FUNDING ASSISTAN
Page 187 and 188:
California Department of Correction
Page 189 and 190:
---------------------------"'----.-
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212: APPENDIX M en :s ::. w I- tI) ::l >
Page 213 and 214: OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH N o ex> Reco
Page 215 and 216: en w :l en en - ..J
Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX N IMPROVING AND INTEGRATIN
Page 219 and 220: High School Senior Survey is specif
Page 221 and 222: At each step we will need to • do
Page 223 and 224: I -I INTRODUCTION 2 The Netherlands
Page 225 and 226: 4 actions has expressly been minimi
Page 227 and 228: 6 Finally general practitioners pre
Page 229 and 230: 8 DESIGN OF THE STUDY The fieldwork
Page 231 and 232: PATTERNS AND LEVELS OF DRUG USE' 10
Page 233 and 234: 12 SOURCES OF INCOME During one mon
Page 235 and 236: 14 multiple regression analysis was
Page 237 and 238: 16 income. Table 6 shows the result
Page 239 and 240: 18 habits. The average "dealing jun
Page 241 and 242: 20 join the market of small time pi
Page 243 and 244: 22 pendent effect on the crime leve
Page 245 and 246: 25 Korf, D.J: Jatten alle junkies?
Page 247 and 248: TABLE 1: MONTHLY PREVALENCE FOR POL
Page 249 and 250: FIGURE 1: 29 RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION
Page 251 and 252: 31 TABLE 4: DETERMINANTS OF CRIMINA
Page 253 and 254: I I I 33 ~ 6: A CRIMINAL/ECONOMIC ~
Page 255 and 256: I Volume 4, Number 12 : March19921
Page 257 and 258: I volume 4, Number 12 March1992) Oc
Page 259 and 260: STIMULANTS VS. OPIATES IV Stimulant
Page 261: HOUSEHOLD SA vs. OA 1989-90, Sacto.
Page 265 and 266: Percent I I I WHITE 1990 I 80 I I 6
Page 267 and 268: Percent 1 O.B 0.6 0.4 0.2 o .6 Gene
Page 269 and 270: Percent 10 8 6 4 2 a 9.1 General Po
Page 271 and 272: NEEDS - ASSESSMENT - GOALS & OBJECT
Page 273 and 274: I GOAL STATEMENT: To develop a sing
Page 275 and 276: TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements
Page 277 and 278: Table 1. . Table2. Table 3. Table 4
Page 279 and 280: Table E-10. Table E-11. Table E-12.
Page 281 and 282: SUMMARY ----,-------------------" T
Page 283 and 284: Developmentally disabled offenders
Page 285 and 286: YOUTH AUTHORI1Y TREATMENT NEEDS ASS
Page 287 and 288: Both versions of the MMPI and the J
Page 289 and 290: Demowphic InfonnMi.rul FINDINGS The
Page 291 and 292: een hospitalized for psychiatric pr
Page 293 and 294: impaired, but who has good contact
Page 295 and 296: The SCPs, like the ITPs, receive of
Page 297 and 298: The Jesness Inventory and the MMPI
Page 299 and 300: CONCLUSIONS A total of 851 offender
Page 301 and 302: REFERENCES Archer, R. P. (1987). Us
Page 303 and 304: APPENDIXB DEMOGRAPIDC DATA FROM TII
Page 305 and 306: 8·~ __ ----- YA010U (I ·S) ---'--
Page 307 and 308: TABLED-3. TOTAL No Attempts One or
Page 309 and 310: TABLE E-1. APPENDIXE TABLES RELATI~
Page 311 and 312: TABLEE-9. TABLEE-I0. TABLEE-ll. TAB
Page 313 and 314:
APPENDIXF THE MINNESOTA IvfULTIPHAS
Page 315 and 316:
Henggeler (1989) mentions that inca
Page 317 and 318:
APPENDIXG THE JESNESS INVENTORY The
Page 319 and 320:
APPENDIX T DRUG POSITIVE RATES IN C
Page 321 and 322:
Second, and perhaps the larger fact
Page 323 and 324:
.1 As shown in Figure 3, the lowest
Page 325 and 326:
Usually, one tends to see drugs tha
Page 327 and 328:
METHADONE PROGRAM CLIENTS PhannChem
show all

1 - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?