29.04.2014 Views

No Place for Hate Crime - National Union of Students

No Place for Hate Crime - National Union of Students

No Place for Hate Crime - National Union of Students

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>No</strong> <strong>Place</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Hate</strong><br />

higher levels <strong>of</strong> depression, anxiety, difficulty sleeping<br />

and other symptoms <strong>of</strong> post-traumatic stress than<br />

victims <strong>of</strong> non-prejudiced incidents <strong>of</strong> similar severity.<br />

Furthermore, those who experienced hate incidents<br />

were far more likely to feel emotions related to their<br />

self-esteem and sense <strong>of</strong> inclusion. In 47 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidents involving prejudice against the victim’s<br />

sexual orientation and 48 per cent involving prejudice<br />

against their gender identity, the victim reported<br />

feeling vulnerable. Forty-six per cent and 31 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidents <strong>of</strong> biased incidents, respectively, resulted<br />

in a loss <strong>of</strong> confidence, whereas only 29 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

non-biased incidents were reported to have caused the<br />

victim to feel vulnerable and only 22 per cent triggered<br />

a loss <strong>of</strong> confidence.<br />

Thirty-two per cent <strong>of</strong> incidents involving bias against<br />

sexual orientation and 22 per cent <strong>of</strong> those related to<br />

gender identity resulted in the victim feeling isolated<br />

or alone, nearly three times as much as in non-bias<br />

incidents. The qualitative data suggested that while<br />

emotions common to both hate and non-prejudiced<br />

incidents (such as anger or annoyance) were likely to<br />

dissipate soon after the incident, feelings related to<br />

vulnerability, isolation and self-esteem were more likely<br />

to be internalised and have long-term effects.<br />

Chart 14 Emotional reactions as a result <strong>of</strong> victimisation<br />

Anger<br />

48%<br />

58%<br />

55%<br />

Shock<br />

Fear<br />

20%<br />

33%<br />

34%<br />

31%<br />

32%<br />

28%<br />

Depression<br />

14%<br />

11%<br />

24%<br />

Anxiety<br />

19%<br />

25%<br />

35%<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> confidence<br />

22%<br />

31%<br />

46%<br />

Incidents motivated by<br />

prejudice against sexual<br />

orientation<br />

Feeling vulnerable<br />

29%<br />

47%<br />

48%<br />

Incidents motivated by<br />

prejudice against gender<br />

identity<br />

Feeling isolated<br />

12%<br />

22%<br />

32%<br />

<strong>No</strong>n bias incidents<br />

Difficulty sleeping<br />

Crying or tears<br />

13%<br />

11%<br />

17<br />

25%<br />

23%<br />

19%<br />

53%<br />

Annoyance<br />

51%<br />

57%<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!