The work on dynamic <strong>entrapment</strong> hazards was a first review of possible future tests. The feasibility trial demonstrated that 3D model<strong>in</strong>g could be a useful technology to better <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m how the <strong>f<strong>in</strong>ger</strong> may be affected by mov<strong>in</strong>g parts, <strong>in</strong> particular the effects on soft tissue. At present, the requirements are <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med by static anthropometry of the jo<strong>in</strong>ts of the <strong>f<strong>in</strong>ger</strong>s, which do not reflect how the fleshy parts of the <strong>f<strong>in</strong>ger</strong>s could be trapped, and the dimensional requirements to protect them. Broad recommendations have been made to reduce the requirements <strong>for</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g parts <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with static requirements, but more work is required to specify these further. 40
7 References Adolph, K. E., Eppler, M. A., Mar<strong>in</strong>, L., Weise, I. B., & Wechsler-Clearfield, M. 2000. Exploration <strong>in</strong> the service of prospective control. Infant Behavior & Development, 23, 441–460. Bhat, A., Heathcock, J., & Galloway, J. C. (2005). Toy oriented changes <strong>in</strong> hand and jo<strong>in</strong>t k<strong>in</strong>ematics dur<strong>in</strong>g the emergence of purposeful reach<strong>in</strong>g. Infant Behavior & Development, 28, 445 – 464. Bushnell, E. (1985). The decl<strong>in</strong>e of visually guided reach<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 139–155. CAESAR, Civilian American and <strong>European</strong> Surface Anthropometric Resource Project, http://store.sae.org/caesar/ CEN/TR 13387:2004 (E) Child Use and Care Articles – Safety Guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Chang, C-C., Zhizhong, L,. Xiuwen, C and Dempsey, P. 2007, Error control and calibration <strong>in</strong> threedimensional anthropometric measurement of the hand by laser scann<strong>in</strong>g with glass support. Measurement, 40, 21-27. Doraiswamy NV, Baig H, 2000, Isolated <strong>f<strong>in</strong>ger</strong> <strong>in</strong>juries <strong>in</strong> children <strong>in</strong>cidence and aetiology. Injury, 31: 571–573. Gibson, E. J. 1997. An ecological psychologist’s prolegomena <strong>for</strong> perceptual development: A functional approach. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldr<strong>in</strong>g (Eds.), Evolv<strong>in</strong>g explanations of development (pp. 23– 54). Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: American Psychological Association. Lobo, M.A and Galloway, G.C., 2008, Postural and Object-Oriented Experiences Advance Early Reach<strong>in</strong>g,Object Exploration, and Means – End Behavior. Child Development, 79, 6, 1869 – 1890. Rennie, K. L., Jebb, S. A., 2005, Prevalence of obesity <strong>in</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, Obesity Reviews, 6 (1), 11–12. Rob<strong>in</strong>son, Maria., 2008, Child Development from Birth to Eight: A journey through the early years. Maidenhead ; New York, Open University Press, McGraw Hill. Rokholm, B., Baker, J. L. 2010, The levell<strong>in</strong>g off of the obesity epidemic s<strong>in</strong>ce the year 1999 – a review of evidence and perspectives, Obesity Reviews, 11 ( 12), 835–846. Smith S., and Norris, B., 2001, Childata: Assessment of the validity of data. Report to the UK DTI Consumer Affairs Directorate, January 2001. Snyder, R.G., Spencer M.L., Ow<strong>in</strong>gs, C.L., Schneider, L.W., 1975, Physical characteristics of children as related to death and <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>for</strong> consumer product design and use. Report no. UM-HSRI-B1-75-5. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD. Steenbekkers, L.P.A., 1993, Child development, design implications and accident prevention. Delft University Press, The Netherlands. Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., Kamm, K., Spencer, J. P.,Schneider, K., & Zernicke, R. F. (1993). The transition to reach<strong>in</strong>g: Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tention and <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic dynamics. Child Development, 64, 1058 – 1098. 41