Requirements for finger entrapment in European safety ... - ANEC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

German females AGE Mean SD 5th%ile 95th%ile 1st%ile 99th%ile 3 yrs 14 0.61 13.00 15.00 12.59 15.41 4 15 1.21 13.00 16.00 12.18 17.82 5 15 0.61 14.00 16.00 13.59 16.41 Dimension 16. Distal joint DIAMETER* (mm) US males and females AGE Mean SD 5th%ile 95th%ile 1st%ile 99th%ile 0 to 2 mo 8.6 0.8 7.1 9.7 6.736 10.464 3 to 5 9.2 0.8 7.4 10.2 7.336 11.064 6 to 8 9.9 0.7 8.7 10.7 8.269 11.531 9 to 11 10.6 0.8 9.5 11.8 8.736 12.464 12 to 15 11 0.7 8.8 11.7 9.369 12.631 16 to 19 10.7 0.7 9.5 11.7 9.069 12.331 20 to 23 11.4 1 9.6 12.6 9.07 13.73 2-3.5 yrs 12.4 0.9 10.5 13.5 10.303 14.497 3.5-4.5 13.1 0.9 11.1 14.1 11.003 15.197 THIRD (RING) FINGER Dimension 17. Distal joint BREADTH (mm) German males and females (measured separately but values the same) AGE Mean SD 5th%ile 95th%ile 1st%ile 99th%ile 3 yrs 11 0.61 10.00 12.00 9.59 12.41 4 11 0.61 10.00 12.00 9.59 12.41 54
Dimension 18. Middle joint BREADTH (mm) German males and females (measured separately but values the same) AGE Mean SD 5th%ile 95th%ile 1st%ile 99th%ile 3 yrs 12 0.61 11.00 13.00 9.59 13.41 4 13 0.61 12.00 14.00 9.59 14.41 Dimension 19. Middle finger distal joint DEPTH (mm) US males and females AGE (yrs) Mean SD 5th% 95th% 1st%ile 99th%ile 2.5-3.5 yrs 9 1 8 11 6.67 11.33 3.5-4.5 yrs 10 1 8 11 7.67 12.33 Dimension 20. Middle finger middle joint DEPTH (mm) US males and females AGE (yrs) mean SD 5th% 95th% 1st%ile 99th%ile 2.5-3.5 yrs 11 1 8 13 8.67 13.33 3.5-4.5 yrs 11 1 9 13 8.67 13.33 * Defined as the largest aperture size through which a finger will not pass EXCEPT ** which is the largest aperture size through which a finger WILL pass 55
Page 1 and 2:
Requirements for tests of child fin
Page 3 and 4: Contents Executive Summary ........
Page 5 and 6: that the proportion of the populati
Page 7 and 8: 1 Introduction This is the final re
Page 9 and 10: 3 Assessment of anthropometric data
Page 11 and 12: percentile values were calculated f
Page 13 and 14: 3.4 Static entrapment - the data Th
Page 15 and 16: openings to prevent the little fing
Page 17 and 18: Table 12: THUMB: distal joint DIAME
Page 19 and 20: Table 14: Calculation of 1 st perce
Page 21 and 22: Table 18: Calculation of 99 th perc
Page 23 and 24: Using the data in Table 21 above, t
Page 25 and 26: Figure 3: The hand of the participa
Page 27 and 28: The feasibility trial shows that as
Page 29 and 30: Seventeen children were observed in
Page 31 and 32: Table 27: Ages of children in month
Page 33 and 34: NUmber of insertions Figure 8: Numb
Page 35 and 36: Table 30: Degree of insertion (all
Page 37 and 38: Thumb Thumb tip only inserted Thumb
Page 39 and 40: 6 Discussion and conclusions An obs
Page 41 and 42: 7 References Adolph, K. E., Eppler,
Page 43 and 44: Appendix 1 - Anthropometric data ta
Page 45 and 46: US males and females AGE Mean SD 5t
Page 47 and 48: 3-5mo 7.6 0.6 6.3 8.3 6.20 9.00 6-8
Page 49 and 50: Dimension 10. MIDDLE FINGER length:
Page 51 and 52: LITTLE FINGER Dimension 12. Distal
Page 53: Dimension 14. Middle joint BREADTH
Page 57 and 58: a. Finger tip only inserted 1 2 3 4
show all

Requirements for finger entrapment in European safety ... - ANEC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?