20.05.2014 Views

“Swiss Rectifier a Novel 3-Phase PFC Concept for High Power EV ...

“Swiss Rectifier a Novel 3-Phase PFC Concept for High Power EV ...

“Swiss Rectifier a Novel 3-Phase PFC Concept for High Power EV ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>“Swiss</strong> <strong>Rectifier</strong> a <strong>Novel</strong> 3-<strong>Phase</strong> <strong>PFC</strong> <strong>Concept</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>High</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>EV</strong> Battery Charging Systems”<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper introduces a new three-phase buck-type unity power factor converter appropriate <strong>for</strong> high power<br />

Electrical Vehicle (<strong>EV</strong>) battery charging mains interfaces. The characteristics of the novel converter, named the<br />

“SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>”, including the principle of operation, modulation strategy, suitable control structure, and<br />

dimensioning <strong>for</strong>mulas, are described in detail in this paper. Additionally, this rectifier solution is compared to a<br />

conventional buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier, by using a comprehensive evaluation method, where the total required<br />

semiconductor chip area and the total volume and weight of the passive components are assessed. Finally, the<br />

feasibility of the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong> battery charging applications is demonstrated by means of measurements<br />

taken from a hardware demonstrator.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

Charging of Electrical Vehicle (<strong>EV</strong>) batteries inherently requires conversion of energy from the AC mains into DCquantities.<br />

Several charging voltage and power levels have been defined by different standardization organizations<br />

(IEC 61851, IEC62196, SAE J1772) [1]. Single-phase<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Factor Corrector (<strong>PFC</strong>) mains interfaces are<br />

commonly employed <strong>for</strong> low charging power levels<br />

(e.g. P < 5 kW), whereas <strong>for</strong> higher charging power levels<br />

3-phase <strong>PFC</strong> mains interfaces have to be applied. Possible<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Electronics (PE) configurations <strong>for</strong> charging of <strong>EV</strong>s<br />

are given in Figure 1. The <strong>EV</strong> charger, typically<br />

implemented as two-stage systems, i.e. comprising a <strong>PFC</strong><br />

rectifier input stage followed by a DC/DC converter can be<br />

either integrated into the car (on-board) or accommodated<br />

in specially designed <strong>EV</strong> charging stations (off-board).<br />

Figure 1: Overview of basic power electronics<br />

converter topologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong> charging systems.<br />

In the particular case of fast charging stations (off-board),<br />

the PE system should be able to guarantee voltage<br />

adaptation to cope with the different specifications of<br />

several types of vehicles. Typically, <strong>for</strong> AC mains<br />

operating at 400V or 480V (line-to-line rms), <strong>EV</strong> chargers<br />

with DC-bus voltage in the range of 250V-450V are<br />

commonly used. Buck-type 3-phase <strong>PFC</strong> rectifiers are<br />

Figure 2: Basic configuration of the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>.


appropriate <strong>for</strong> high power <strong>EV</strong> chargers, as a direct connection to<br />

the DC-bus could be used. If isolation of the <strong>PFC</strong> output from the<br />

DC-bus is desired due to safety considerations, this could be<br />

facilitated by an isolated DC/DC converter connected in series,<br />

which could additionally be used <strong>for</strong> voltage level adaptation [2].<br />

Compared to boost-type topologies, buck-type ones provide a<br />

wider output voltage control range, while maintaining <strong>PFC</strong><br />

capability at the input, and allowing <strong>for</strong> dynamic current limitation<br />

[3]. In addition, 3-phase boost rectifiers produce an output voltage<br />

too high to directly feed the DC-bus (typically 700V-800V),<br />

requiring a step-down DC/DC converter at their output.<br />

This paper introduces a new 3-phase buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier<br />

topology, named as “SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>” [4] [5] (cf. Figure 2),<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> high power <strong>EV</strong> battery charging systems (coloured<br />

AC/DC converter blocks in Figure 1). Other suitable applications<br />

include power supplies <strong>for</strong> telecommunication systems, future<br />

more electric aircraft, variable speed AC drives and high power<br />

lighting systems. The characteristics of the new topology, which<br />

constitutes a new 3-phase active third harmonic injection rectifier<br />

and a suitable control stage, are presented in Section II.<br />

Additionally, the methods <strong>for</strong> calculating losses of all the<br />

Figure 3: The four conduction states of the<br />

SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> <strong>for</strong> u a >u b >u c .<br />

components, semiconductors and passives, are given. In Section III, the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> is systematically compared<br />

with the 6-switch buck-type rectifier, which is a conventional buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier approach. Finally, in Section<br />

IV, measurements taken from constructed hardware prototypes are used to confirm the theoretical considerations.<br />

II. SWISS RECTIFIER: A NEW 3-PHASE AC/DC BUCK-TYPE CONVERTER<br />

Figure 2 shows the basic circuit configuration of the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>, which was derived from a 3-phase boost-type<br />

active third harmonic injection rectifier proposed by [6]. With this new buck-type topology and a relatively low<br />

complexity control stage, not only controlled output voltage can be achieved, but also unity power factor operation.<br />

Four different conduction states can be defined by T + and T - within a pulse period, where the active current<br />

injection occurs always into only one mains phase as illustrated in Figure 3 <strong>for</strong> the interval ωt ϵ [0,π/3] (u a >u b >u c ).<br />

The proper selection of the switching states of T + and T - allows control over the current ripples across the inductor L


and the injection current, i y . Accordingly, the converter can<br />

be strategically modulated in order to minimize the current<br />

ripple of i y or of the output current I DC . Sinusoidal mains<br />

currents (i a =Gu a , i b =Gu b and i c =Gu c ) can be achieved if the<br />

duty cycles of T + , k 1 , and T - , k 2 , are defined as follows:<br />

k<br />

u<br />

max( u , u , u )<br />

a b c<br />

1 pn 2 2 2<br />

ua ub uc<br />

and<br />

k<br />

u<br />

min( u , u , u )<br />

a b c<br />

2 pn 2 2 2<br />

ua ub uc<br />

Figure 4: Circuit operation <strong>for</strong> interval u a >u b >u c .<br />

For instance, within the interval u a >u b >u c , k 1 and k 2 are<br />

driven by:<br />

u u u Gu u i i<br />

k <br />

pn a pn a pn a a<br />

1<br />

u 2 2 2 2 2 2<br />

a<br />

ub uc G u P<br />

a<br />

ub uc<br />

o<br />

IDC<br />

<br />

<br />

and<br />

k<br />

u u u Gu u i i<br />

<br />

. The<br />

pn c pn c pn c c<br />

2<br />

u 2 2 2 2 2 2<br />

a<br />

ub uc Gua u P<br />

b<br />

uc<br />

o<br />

IDC<br />

circuit equivalent of the possible conduction states (cf. Figure 3) is shown in Figure 4, where the converter current<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation is given by i 1k I 1k I i . This mathematical expression combined with the modulation<br />

y 1 DC 2 DC b<br />

definition k 1 =i a /I DC and k 2 =-i c /I DC , leads to i a +i b +i c =0, confirming the resistive mains behavior.<br />

A suitable feedback PWM control structure, EMI filtering, and the main converter dimensioning <strong>for</strong>mulas, which<br />

include the average and rms current values of the power semiconductors, are given in Figure 5. In the proposed<br />

control, by setting the PWM modulator <strong>for</strong> T + and T - to operate with in-phase carriers, the current ripple across i y<br />

will be reduced while the output current I DC ripple will be maximized. For interleaved operation of these carriers, the<br />

opposite will occur. The simulation results describing the principle of operation of the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> are shown in<br />

Figure 6. The converter specification given in Table I is considered in the simulation where operation with in-phase<br />

or interleaved PWM carriers, and load steps (from 5 kW to 10 kW), are presented. As can be observed, the results<br />

demonstrate that the line currents, i a,b,c , can effectively follow the sinusoidal input voltages, u a,b,c , even in case of<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 5: SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>: PWM control structure, EMI filtering and current stress across the semiconductors.


Table. I- SWISS rectifier specifications.<br />

Input voltage, u a,b,c : 230Vrms<br />

Input frequency, f in : 50Hz<br />

Switching frequency, f S : 72kHz<br />

Output power, P 0 : 10kW<br />

Output capacitor, C 0 : 400µF<br />

Inductor, L:<br />

300µH<br />

load steps, attesting the feasibility of the<br />

proposed rectifier and PWM control. More<br />

details <strong>for</strong> this system, including the EMI<br />

emissions modelling and filter design, as well<br />

as the control analysis, will be given in the<br />

final paper.<br />

III. COMPARATIVE <strong>EV</strong>ALUATION<br />

In order to evaluate and compare the SWISS<br />

<strong>Rectifier</strong> with a standard buck-type AC/DC<br />

converter, i.e. the 6-switch buck-type <strong>PFC</strong><br />

rectifier (cf. Figure 7), several normalized<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance indices are defined. Based on<br />

these per<strong>for</strong>mance metrics a comparative<br />

Figure 6: Simulation results <strong>for</strong> SWISS rectifier operating with inphase<br />

or interleaved PWM carriers and load steps (5kW to 10kW).<br />

evaluation of the proposed systems is<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med graphically, as illustrated in<br />

Figure 8. An advantageous system would preferably cover the smallest area in the selected graphical representation.<br />

According to the results, the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> is the topology of choice <strong>for</strong> a buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> of an <strong>EV</strong> charger.<br />

Figure 7: <strong>Power</strong> circuit structure of a conventional 6-switch<br />

buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier and dimensioning <strong>for</strong>mulas.<br />

Figure 8: Comparative evaluation of 3-phase <strong>PFC</strong><br />

buck rectifier topologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong> charging systems.


In the final paper, a more comprehensive evaluation method <strong>for</strong> <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier systems will be introduced, where the<br />

total required semiconductor chip area and the total volume and weight of the passive components will be assessed.<br />

This approach not only provides a distinct Figure-of-Merit <strong>for</strong> comparison, but also enables the semiconductor costs,<br />

efficiency, and power density of the different topologies to be determined.<br />

IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />

In this section, the feasibility of the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> and the 6-switch buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong> battery<br />

charging systems is demonstrated by measurements taken from constructed hardware prototypes. In this Digest only<br />

results of the experimental tests carried out <strong>for</strong> the latter rectifier are shown. However, in the final version of this<br />

paper, the prototype and experimental results <strong>for</strong> the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> will also be presented.<br />

In Figure 9(a), an ultra-efficient (≈99%) 6-switch buck-type rectifier prototype is shown. The power density of this<br />

system is 2.2 kW/dm 3 . Figure 9(b) presents the measured sinusoidal input currents <strong>for</strong> 4.5 kW operation. The results<br />

obtained with the prototype confirm the operation and advantages of this system <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong> applications.<br />

i a i b i c<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 9: (a) 6-switch buck-type rectifier prototype and (b) experimental results.<br />

5A/Div<br />

2ms/Div<br />

V. CONCLUSIONS and FINAL PAPER<br />

This paper proposes a novel 3-phase unity power factor AC/DC converter appropriate not only <strong>for</strong> high power <strong>EV</strong><br />

battery charging systems, but also power supplies <strong>for</strong> telecommunication systems, future more electric aircraft,<br />

variable speed AC drivers and high power lighting systems. The converter concept, named as “SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>”, is<br />

comprehensively compared with a conventional 6-switch buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> rectifier. According to the results, the<br />

SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> is the topology of choice <strong>for</strong> a buck-type <strong>PFC</strong> mains interface of an <strong>EV</strong> battery charger.<br />

In the final version of this paper, the requirements <strong>for</strong> mains interface converters in <strong>EV</strong> battery charging applications<br />

will be described in detail. More in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> the SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong>, including the EMI emissions modelling and<br />

filter design, as well as the control analysis, will be given. In addition, a detailed analysis of component losses <strong>for</strong> 10<br />

kW systems employing Si and SiC semiconductor devices will be shown. Finally, the prototype and experimental<br />

results <strong>for</strong> a 10 kW SWISS <strong>Rectifier</strong> will be presented.


REFERENCES<br />

[1] D. Aggeler, F. Canales, H. Zelaya, A. Coccia, N. Butcher, and O. Apeldoorn, “Ultra-Fast DC-Charger<br />

Infrastructures <strong>for</strong> <strong>EV</strong>-Mobility and Future Smart Grids”, Proc. Of the Innovative Smart Grid Techn. Conf.<br />

Europe (ISGT 2010), 2010.<br />

[2] A. Kuperman, U. Levy, J. Goren, A. Zafranski and A. Savernin, “<strong>High</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Li-Ion Battery Charger <strong>for</strong><br />

Electric Vehicle”, Proc. Of the 7th Int. Conf. Workshop Compatibility and <strong>Power</strong> Electron. (CPE 2011),<br />

2011.<br />

[3] A. Stupar, T. Friedli, J. Miniböck, and J.W. Kolar, “Towards a 99% Efficient Three-<strong>Phase</strong> Buck-Type <strong>PFC</strong><br />

<strong>Rectifier</strong> <strong>for</strong> 400 V DC Distribution Systems”, Proc. Of the 25th Ann. IEEE Appl. <strong>Power</strong> Electron. Conf.<br />

and Exp. (APEC 2010), 2010.<br />

[4] J. W. Kolar, M. Hartmann, T. Friedli, “ Hybrider Dreiphasiger AD/DC-Konverter und Verfahren zu dessen<br />

Steuerung”. Patent application nr CH00298/11, 2011.<br />

[5] J. W. Kolar, M. Hartmann, and T. Friedli, “Tutorial: Three-<strong>Phase</strong> <strong>PFC</strong> <strong>Rectifier</strong> and AC-AC Converter<br />

Systems”, Proc. Of the 25th Ann. IEEE Appl. <strong>Power</strong> Electron. Conf. and Exp. (APEC 2010), 2010.<br />

[6] J. C. Salmon, “Comparative evaluation of circuit topologies <strong>for</strong> 1-phase and 3-phase boost rectifiers<br />

operated with a low current distortion,” Proc. of Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer<br />

Engineering, Halifax, Canada, September 1994.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!