25.05.2014 Views

26. passage of particles through matter - Particle Data Group

26. passage of particles through matter - Particle Data Group

26. passage of particles through matter - Particle Data Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>26.</strong> Passage <strong>of</strong> <strong>particles</strong> <strong>through</strong> <strong>matter</strong> 17<br />

400<br />

200<br />

E c (MeV)<br />

100<br />

50<br />

610 ________ MeV<br />

Z + 1.24<br />

710 MeV ________<br />

Z + 0.92<br />

20<br />

Solids<br />

Gases<br />

10<br />

5<br />

H He Li Be B CNONe Fe Sn<br />

1 2 5 10 20 50 100<br />

Z<br />

Figure <strong>26.</strong>12: Electron critical energy for the chemical elements, using Rossi’s<br />

definition [3]. The fits shown are for solids and liquids (solid line) and gases (dashed<br />

line). The rms deviation is 2.2% for the solids and 4.0% for the gases. (Computed<br />

with code supplied by A. Fassó.)<br />

is equal to the electron energy. Equivalently, it is the same as the first definition with<br />

the approximation |dE/dx| brems ≈ E/X 0 . This form has been found to describe more<br />

accurately transverse electromagnetic shower development (see below). These definitions<br />

are illustrated in the case <strong>of</strong> copper in Fig. <strong>26.</strong>11.<br />

The accuracy <strong>of</strong> approximate forms for E c has been limited by the failure to distinguish<br />

between gases and solid or liquids, where there is a substantial difference in ionization<br />

at the relevant energy because <strong>of</strong> the density effect. We distinguish these two cases in<br />

Fig. <strong>26.</strong>12. Fits were also made with functions <strong>of</strong> the form a/(Z + b) α , but α was found<br />

to be essentially unity. Since E c also depends on A, I, and other factors, such forms are<br />

at best approximate.<br />

<strong>26.</strong>4.4. Energy loss by photons: Contributions to the photon cross section in a light<br />

element (carbon) and a heavy element (lead) are shown in Fig. <strong>26.</strong>13. At low energies it<br />

is seen that the photoelectric effect dominates, although Compton scattering, Rayleigh<br />

scattering, and photonuclear absorption also contribute. The photoelectric cross section<br />

is characterized by discontinuities (absorption edges) as thresholds for photoionization <strong>of</strong><br />

various atomic levels are reached. Photon attenuation lengths for a variety <strong>of</strong> elements<br />

are shown in Fig. <strong>26.</strong>15, and data for 30 eV< k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!