Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive
Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive
Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered - The Preterist Archive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the week every year.<br />
Although the authors of the Qumran calendrical texts disdained the lunisolar calendar, a number of<br />
their writings synchronize the two versions (see Priestly Courses I and Priestly Courses II, below).<br />
<strong>The</strong> reasons for this synchronization are not entirely clear, but two suggestions may be somewhere<br />
close to the mark. First, these authors considered all time holy and its measurement ordained by God.<br />
It was probably thought necessary that someone keep a proper record of its passing. Since the<br />
opponents of the authors could not be relied upon to do so - following, as they did, an illicit system -<br />
the Qumran authors took the responsibility. In order to discharge this responsibility, it would be as<br />
necessary to be able to point out errors as to know the correct answers. Thus, they tracked time by the<br />
system of their opponents as well as by their own. Second, the authors of these texts certainly<br />
expected that at some time they would be in power in Jerusalem. At that time, of course, they would<br />
impose the solar calendar, but in order to know where they were in the year, they would have to know<br />
both the false lunisolar date and the real solar date. In fact, there is some evidence that at certain<br />
points in the Second Temple period the solar calendar actually was imposed, at least for short periods.<br />
In all their timekeeping, the authors of the Qumran calendars reckoned not only by months, but also<br />
by the rotation of the priestly courses (mishmarot). <strong>The</strong> courses would come into Jerusalem for<br />
service at the temple for one week, then rotate out as the next group arrived to serve. Qumran texts<br />
relied upon this 'eternal cycle' not only for their calendar units, but also for their chronography and<br />
historiography (see Priestly Courses III). Every Sabbath, month, year and feast bore the name of a<br />
priestly family (see Priestly Courses IV).<br />
<strong>The</strong> priestly rotation required six years before the same group would be serving once again in the<br />
same week of the year. This sexennial cycle reflects the need to synchronize the solar calendar with<br />
the lunisolar version. Since the solar calendar totalled 364 days to the year, while the lunisolar<br />
calendar alternated months of 29 and 30 days, the lunisolar calendar would 'fall behind' by ten days<br />
per year. After three years, however, the lunisolar calendar was intercalated with an additional 29 or<br />
30 days, bringing the two versions once again into harmony (364 X 3 = 354 X 3 + 30). Two such<br />
cycles fit perfectly with the six years needed for one complete priestly cycle.<br />
<strong>The</strong> order of the priestly courses was originally determined by lot, and is laid out in 1 Chr. 24:7-18 as<br />
follows: (1) Jehoiarib (spelled 'Joiarib' in the Qumran texts), (2) Jedaiah, (3) Harim, (4) Seorim, (5)<br />
Malchijah (sometimes spelled Malachijah in the Qumran texts), (6) Mijamin, (7) Hakkoz, (8) Abijah,