01.06.2014 Views

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Tourist visa for all (up to period of 3 months) - students, or people<br />

involved in cultural exchange could stay longer but with a guarantee<br />

from a certain institution.<br />

Family members could join their families in the EU countries also with<br />

a guarantee and if supported financially because they would not be<br />

granted a work permit for a certain time.<br />

The EU promised to meet again in 3 years with the SEE countries to discuss<br />

the complete abolishment of visas.<br />

Nevertheless, due to the need to enforce the border policy and the fight<br />

against illegal immigration and human trafficking, some supplementary<br />

agreements were established.<br />

The SEE and EU will cooperate to create a specific EU-SEE commission<br />

to check the border policy, to establish a penalty regime for those countries<br />

who will not cooperate, to enforce the collaboration between countries<br />

and their policies.<br />

2) AGRICULTURAL POLICY:<br />

There won't be any substantial changes in customs; penalties will be<br />

enforced for those who won't follow EU instructions, also some economic<br />

facilities will be introduced for the SEE countries in order to help them<br />

reach the EU market and to front their increasing economical efforts.<br />

3) ADRIATIC HIGHWAY:<br />

Highway is seen as the means to improve the general infrastructure. The<br />

first proposed highway would connect capital cities, which are the biggest<br />

commercial centers; the second would improve the economy of the underdeveloped<br />

parts and decrease the isolation of what can be perceived as<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>'s peripheral area. The goal was to agree, which highway should be<br />

built considering particular interests of the countries concerned as well as<br />

the significance of such a highway for the larger region. EU has the<br />

resources to finance only one highway and it was upon the countries participating<br />

in discussion to decide which. It was a very vivid argument<br />

because neither of the sides agreed to back down. Only right before the<br />

closing of the game and drafting of the document did they reach a solution<br />

(the result of lobbying during the coffee break) that the 2 nd so-called<br />

Adriatic route is more necessary because of the low development of the<br />

region. Also by realizing the importance of the highway connecting capital<br />

cities (Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Athens), the EU agreed to look for<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!