01.06.2014 Views

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

europe's (torn?) identity - Projects - AEGEE Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE YUGOSLAV LESSON<br />

AND THE EU<br />

»<strong>Europe</strong>anness« 1 as a particular form of transnational <strong>identity</strong> might help us in<br />

the search for the kind of democratic community that provides existential credibility<br />

and brings meaning to an individual life. However, it would be inaccurate<br />

to understand “<strong>Europe</strong>anness” merely as a top-down political demand that<br />

would rob us of our concrete experience of the immediate surroundings and the<br />

life-world. Such a model would be contrary to the ideal and the desire for a<br />

meaningful belonging to the community, a belonging that rests on the assumption<br />

of concentric circles of <strong>identity</strong>. These circles flow from an individual self<br />

and his/her immediate environment, the family, stretching onto the locale and<br />

the nation, attempting to reach regional and trans-national identities, possibly<br />

ending in an embrace of humanity as the ultimate, albeit weakly conceived community.<br />

Individual and collective bonds first arise from within local boundaries and later<br />

spread beyond them. Any attempt to leap-frog local boundaries in favor of a<br />

global citizenship or an unmediated <strong>Europe</strong>anism is probably destined to fail<br />

because the consequence of such an <strong>identity</strong> politics would be that people would<br />

no longer feel at home. The old cliché that Moliere slipped into Le Misanthrope<br />

that he who loves all of mankind cares not for individuals and their concrete<br />

reality no doubt still holds true. Only if we establish our needs and fulfill them<br />

in the framework of particular identifications can we begin to hope for an access<br />

to more general forms of identification.<br />

National and ethnic identities are neither insignificant nor necessarily harmful,<br />

as many leftist thinkers would have us believe. The central question of <strong>identity</strong><br />

must be reformulated: how and on what basis can we balance the demands for<br />

an ethnic <strong>identity</strong> vis-à-vis trans-ethnic identities in which we balance both<br />

types of bonds and responsibilities? Reflection on these choices and the search<br />

for equilibrium is unavoidable in a pursuit of an appropriate framework for<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an <strong>identity</strong>, a framework that will not sacrifice national identification<br />

tout court.<br />

One way to approach the issue is through education. For example, if <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

children learned early on about ligatures of belonging based on the self as being<br />

part of the whole, they might become acquainted and comfortable with the concept<br />

of broader communal ties. In this way, they might gain a solid foundation<br />

for coping with the complex world beyond their specific locality. They may thus<br />

acquire a greater level of self-confidence as they move along the concentric cir-<br />

1 Edited impromptu speech.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!