Table 2 Perceptions <strong>of</strong> Organizational Support Scale Item n M SD Administration understands importance <strong>of</strong> Web-based initiatives 61 .49 1.48 Receives adequate administrative direction 73 -.16 1.44 Receives adequate technical training 74 -.46 1.37 Receives adequate monetary support 73 -.51 1.41 Receives necessary time to devote to Web initiatives 76 -.58 1.62 Receives adequate conceptual training 73 -.66 1.54 Receives adequate staffing and resources 59 -.79 1.52 References Bortree, D. S., &. Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis <strong>of</strong> environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook pr<strong>of</strong>iles. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 35, 317-319. Botan, C. H. (1997). Ethics in strategic communications campaigns: The case for A new approach to public relations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Communication, 34, 188-202. Callison, C. (2003). Media relations and the Internet: How fortune 500 company Web sites assist journalists in news gathering. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 29, 29- 41. Christ, P. (2005). Internet technologies and trends transforming public relations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Website Promotion, 1(4), 3-14. Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (<strong>2010</strong>). Adoption <strong>of</strong> social media for public relations by nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 36, 90-92. Diga, M., & Kelleher, T. (2009). Social media use, perceptions <strong>of</strong> decision-making power, and public relations roles. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 35, 440-442. Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (1999). Corporate World Wide Web pages: Serving the news media and other publics. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(3), 456–467. Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (2000). Organization <strong>of</strong> corporate Web pages: <strong>Public</strong>s and functions. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 26, 327–344. Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners’ use <strong>of</strong> social media tools and communication technology: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 34, 168
412-414. Gonzalez-Herrero, A., & Ruiz, M. (2006). Trends in online media relations: Webbased corporate press rooms in leading international companies. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 32, 267-275. Gower, K., & Cho, J. (2001). Use <strong>of</strong> the Internet in the public relations curriculum. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 56(2), 81-92. Gregory, A. (2004). Scope and structure <strong>of</strong> public relations: A technology driven view. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 30, 245-254. Kang, S., & Norton, H. E. (2006). Colleges and universities’ use <strong>of</strong> the World Wide Web: A public relations tool for the digital age. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review 32, 426-428. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building a dialogic relationship through the World Wide Web. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 24, 321-340. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory <strong>of</strong> public relations. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 28, 21-37. McAllister-Spooner, S. M. (2009). Fulfilling the dialogic promise: A ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 35, (320-322). McAllister-Spooner, S. M. (2008). User perceptions <strong>of</strong> dialogic public relations tactics via the Internet. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Journal, 2(1). McAllister-Spooner, S. M. (<strong>2010</strong>). Whose Site Is It Anyway? Expectations <strong>of</strong> College Web sites <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Journal, 4(2). McAllister-Spooner, S. M., & Kent, M. L. (2009). Dialogic communication and resource dependency: Community colleges as models for Web site effectiveness. Atlantic Journal <strong>of</strong> Communication, 17(4), 220-239. McAllister-Spooner, S. M., & Taylor, M. (2007). Community college Web sites as tools for fostering dialogue. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 33, 230-232. McAllister-Spooner, S. M., & Taylor, M. (in press). Organizational influences and constraints on community college Web based media relations. Community College Journal <strong>of</strong> Research and Practice. Newland Hill, L., & White, C. (2000). <strong>Public</strong> relations practitioners' perceptions <strong>of</strong> the World Wide Web as a communications tool. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 26, 31-51. Porter, L., Chung, D., & Sweetser, K. (2009). The blogosphere and public relations: investigating practitioners’ roles and blog use. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communication Management, 13(3), 250-267. Reber, B. H., Gower, K. K., & Robinson, J. K. (2007). The Internet and litigation public relations. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Research, 18(1), 23–44. Reber, B. H., & Kim, J. K. (2006). How activist groups use Web sites in media relations: Evaluating online press rooms. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Research, 18(4), 313– 333. Ryan, M. (2003). <strong>Public</strong> relations and the Web: Organizational problems, gender, and institutional type. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 29, 335-349. Seltzer, T., & Mitrook, M. A. (2007). The dialogic potential <strong>of</strong> weblogs in relationship building. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 33, 227-229. Seo, H., Kim, J. Y., & Yang, S. (2009). Global activism and new media: A study <strong>of</strong> transnational NGOs’ online public relations. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 35, 123- 126. 169
- Page 1 and 2:
2 0 1 0 P R O C E E D I N G S W A S
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Research Papers _
- Page 5 and 6:
Public Relations Leadership through
- Page 7 and 8:
Millennial Students Relationship wi
- Page 9 and 10:
elationship approach to PR provides
- Page 11 and 12:
social media marketing is effective
- Page 13 and 14:
students who noted they were 17 or
- Page 15 and 16:
discussed previously, Millennial st
- Page 17 and 18:
strongly committed to maintaining a
- Page 19 and 20:
gender (male/female) and each of th
- Page 21 and 22:
social media. One focus of the arti
- Page 23 and 24:
Shah, A. (2007, June 18). Social me
- Page 25 and 26:
Appendix B Table 2 Differences Betw
- Page 27 and 28:
Appendix D Table 4 Differences Betw
- Page 29 and 30:
Appendix F Table 6 Pearson Correlat
- Page 31 and 32:
Mentoring 2.0: How PR Educators Use
- Page 33 and 34:
Despite this, however, studies have
- Page 35 and 36:
Sometimes using Facebook to IM is a
- Page 37 and 38:
Investing time. As with any relatio
- Page 39 and 40:
pursuing chosen fields. For public
- Page 41 and 42:
Tam, S. Y., Dozier, D. M., Lauzen,
- Page 43 and 44:
While favor towards nuclear energy
- Page 45 and 46:
frames present new considerations w
- Page 47 and 48:
Procedural -Licensing and applicati
- Page 49 and 50:
“Shoreham Board Begins a Hunt for
- Page 51 and 52:
While the story element “positive
- Page 53 and 54:
Gamson, W. & Lasch, K. (1983). The
- Page 55 and 56:
Reputation Matters: Impact of Organ
- Page 57 and 58:
leadership had at hand a number of
- Page 59 and 60:
and 65+ (15.4%). More than half wer
- Page 61 and 62:
evealed significant differences for
- Page 63 and 64:
will be rewarded in the marketplace
- Page 65 and 66:
Investigating Multiplier Effects of
- Page 67 and 68:
RQ1: Do PR practitioners and busine
- Page 69 and 70:
accepting information they receive
- Page 71 and 72:
still smacks of news. News coverage
- Page 73 and 74:
Even when testimonials do not withs
- Page 75 and 76:
viewed to some degree as a valuable
- Page 77 and 78:
Perceptions of Product Blogs in Tai
- Page 79 and 80:
Uses and gratifications theory has
- Page 81 and 82:
Thus the degree to which blog reade
- Page 83 and 84:
hours). Blog reading was dwarfed by
- Page 85 and 86:
Effects of Language on Responses Ba
- Page 87 and 88:
esponse (M = 4.13). For online acti
- Page 89 and 90:
5-item Index 4.41(1.030) 3.80(1.033
- Page 91 and 92:
ecommendations were more objective
- Page 93 and 94:
Choney, B. (2009, September 29). Mi
- Page 95 and 96:
Lenhart, A., Purecell, K., Smith, A
- Page 97 and 98:
elational trust. Journal of Public
- Page 99 and 100:
challenge will be to persuade survi
- Page 101 and 102:
of Avian Flu. It is important to no
- Page 103 and 104:
with an arousing stimulus or messag
- Page 105 and 106:
Chen, N. (2009). Institutionalizing
- Page 107 and 108:
Excellence in an Activist Organizat
- Page 109 and 110:
public relations functions or tacti
- Page 111 and 112:
Data Collection Documents. In an ef
- Page 113 and 114:
Research. A key area of CTFK’s we
- Page 115 and 116:
Engaging individuals. Many times ac
- Page 117 and 118: Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico; ge
- Page 119 and 120: Murphy, P. & Dee, J. (1996) Reconci
- Page 121 and 122: of Educational Progress (NAEP), 80%
- Page 123 and 124: school assessment, and that the pro
- Page 125 and 126: Both the paper and Web-based survey
- Page 127 and 128: student was admitted to their acade
- Page 129 and 130: Problems with the measures: Here, s
- Page 131 and 132: Patterns in the open-ended response
- Page 133 and 134: Trends evident in K-12 education, t
- Page 135 and 136: Another 15% of respondents (n = 8)
- Page 137 and 138: Table 1 Respondents’ Perceptions
- Page 139 and 140: Table 4 Frequencies of Listed Writi
- Page 141 and 142: Hansen, R.S. (1993). Clear, concise
- Page 143 and 144: so, this study follows up on recent
- Page 145 and 146: 2009). In BMCC context, in addition
- Page 147 and 148: --------------------------------- I
- Page 149 and 150: social media is not crisis communic
- Page 151 and 152: and uses and gratifications theorie
- Page 153 and 154: Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P.,
- Page 155 and 156: Table 1 BMCC Model Propositions (__
- Page 157 and 158: FIGURE 1 BMM Model (_____ & _____,
- Page 159 and 160: practitioners and scholars argue fo
- Page 161 and 162: Several studies, however, suggest t
- Page 163 and 164: factors that impact the development
- Page 165 and 166: perceptions of administrative suppo
- Page 167: (2009) reminds us that the limitati
- Page 171 and 172: Intersections and Overlaps: Buildin
- Page 173 and 174: elations excellence, relationship-b
- Page 175 and 176: 2002), all of which encourage emplo
- Page 177 and 178: Conley and Wagner-Marsh (1998) prop
- Page 179 and 180: passion, caring for people.” Note
- Page 181 and 182: done.” Accommodations such as fle
- Page 183 and 184: organizational commitment and loyal
- Page 185 and 186: Founder/Leader Faith & Vision Authe
- Page 187 and 188: Practical implications This study a
- Page 189 and 190: public relations (pp. 3-22). Mahwah
- Page 191 and 192: Grunig, L. A. (1992). Power in the
- Page 193 and 194: presented to the annual conference
- Page 195 and 196: Prioritizing Stakeholders for Publi
- Page 197 and 198: developed by Grunig and Hunt (1984)
- Page 199 and 200: expectant stakeholders possess two
- Page 201 and 202: each other” (p. 125). Examples of
- Page 203 and 204: Priority publics are those whose pa
- Page 205 and 206: Collection of data triangulated (Yi
- Page 207 and 208: Diffused Linkage. A diffused stakeh
- Page 209 and 210: Envirocare take it. They are also m
- Page 211 and 212: Dunham, L., Freeman, R. E., & Liedt
- Page 213 and 214: PEDAGOGICAL POSTERS 213
- Page 215 and 216: seem to be context-dependent (Lauri
- Page 217 and 218: Shapiro, A. (2003). Case Studies in
- Page 219 and 220:
Argument #2: stories are for childr
- Page 221 and 222:
Physiology “…your mind was evol
- Page 223 and 224:
Conclusion In the movie, Indiana Jo
- Page 225 and 226:
Pitching on your Feet: Using a Mock
- Page 227 and 228:
speaker(s) are available after the
- Page 229 and 230:
college’s connection to the commu
- Page 231 and 232:
“I felt the class built upon our
- Page 233 and 234:
community. Many participants have c
- Page 235 and 236:
posting content to the Internet, bu
- Page 237 and 238:
What’s All The Hype About Skype?
- Page 239 and 240:
In between the times the class meet
- Page 241 and 242:
Best Practices in Public Relations:
- Page 243 and 244:
Assignment Structure Client Selecti
- Page 245 and 246:
Conclusion Integrating real-world c
- Page 247 and 248:
equires true fluency in the host co
- Page 249 and 250:
living in London. Because visa and
- Page 251 and 252:
Using the Case Study approach to an
- Page 253 and 254:
tier responders hadn’t participat
- Page 255 and 256:
Harnessing the Web for Teaching Wri
- Page 257 and 258:
these tools and platforms. With wri
- Page 259 and 260:
article 2. 259
- Page 261 and 262:
Experimental methods may be better
- Page 263 and 264:
The third hypothesis asked whether
- Page 265 and 266:
Crisis in the Classroom: A cross-de
- Page 267 and 268:
prepare and do the research. I prov
- Page 269 and 270:
• September 2009 - More students
- Page 271 and 272:
Public Relations Leadership Through
- Page 273 and 274:
from using it multiple times a day
- Page 275 and 276:
Kent, M. (2010). Directions in soci
- Page 277 and 278:
Professor Clare Morgan at Oxford no
- Page 279 and 280:
evenings at home working on his poe
- Page 281 and 282:
Another strategy for the students w
- Page 283 and 284:
Media list and crisis media list So
- Page 285 and 286:
understand that knowledge of the cl
- Page 287 and 288:
If creating separate teams for one
- Page 289 and 290:
Integrating ethics into the undergr
- Page 291 and 292:
Three-step approach The present aut
- Page 293:
Putting Theory, Research and Strate