02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

2: <strong>Australian</strong> literature review<br />

This analysis focuses on wage subsidies, and in particular <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> SYETP program.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re have been a few past reviews, <strong>the</strong>se have proceeded with <strong>the</strong> general aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> summarising labour market programs in Australia from various historical economic or<br />

socio-political perspectives [Edwards (1987), Ross (1988), Stretton and Chapman (1990),<br />

Webster (1998) Harris (2001)], including governmental reviews [OECD (2001), BLMR<br />

(June 1984)]. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se have also tried to assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programs by<br />

canvassing <strong>the</strong> evaluation evidence to date. The focus here is on extracting information<br />

about wage subsidies only and in particular SYETP.<br />

The chief intention is to summarise <strong>the</strong> results and critically assess <strong>the</strong> micro-evaluation<br />

evidence. Some effort is made to retain detail <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data, methods and variables used to<br />

achieve <strong>the</strong> evaluation results, as <strong>the</strong>se can have some bearing on <strong>the</strong> outcome and can<br />

help place our results amongst <strong>the</strong> evidence to date. The empirical literature covered is<br />

limited to microeconomic evaluations. These evaluate programs by looking at <strong>the</strong> effect<br />

on <strong>the</strong> participant and can establish whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> program changes <strong>the</strong> outcome for <strong>the</strong><br />

selected individuals after <strong>the</strong> program has ended, mainly examining employment. An<br />

important aspect <strong>of</strong> evaluations <strong>of</strong> this type is that <strong>the</strong>y try to establish whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

participant would have a job anyway, and try to assess this using information about what<br />

happens after <strong>the</strong> program has ended. The brevity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation review reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

paucity <strong>of</strong> formal evaluation in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> literature.<br />

Empirical evidence for <strong>Australian</strong> wage subsidies is treated in several parts. Only recent<br />

work completed during or after 1980 is included, as this corresponds to <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong><br />

SYETP analysed later, but also because this is when published evaluations first occurred<br />

in Australia. <strong>Australian</strong> wage subsidies o<strong>the</strong>r than SYETP are firstly briefly treated.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> broad extent <strong>of</strong> SYETP, <strong>the</strong>re were few o<strong>the</strong>r subsidies and this section is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!