02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

For those aged over 45 and similarly long-term unemployed, an ‘extended AWSS’ was<br />

available, at $125 per week for up to 52 weeks.<br />

Edwards (1987) p86 notes that <strong>the</strong>re were limitations on <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> employer’s<br />

workforce which could be employed under all/any wage subsidy programmes from <strong>the</strong><br />

Federal government and cites <strong>the</strong> guidelines to CES 5 as stating that at any one time, a<br />

single physical location <strong>of</strong> factory, shop or <strong>of</strong>fice with 1-3 staff could have 1 placement;<br />

while those with 4-7 staff could have 2 placements; for those with 8-100 staff, not more<br />

than 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> staff could be placements; and for those with more than 100 staff not<br />

more than 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> staff could be placements. This would have limited both AWSS<br />

and SYETP placements. Routley (1984) indicates that in <strong>the</strong> first four months <strong>of</strong><br />

operation in 1983, 1,642 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eligible target group were approved for placements.<br />

Approvals <strong>the</strong>n rose to 15,353 over 12 months in 1983/4 and <strong>the</strong>n 14,388 in 1984/5<br />

(Edwards (1987) p88 Table 7.1, sourced from DEIR (1985) Annual Report figures). Ross<br />

(1988) p48 shows that expenditure on AWSS rose with <strong>the</strong> increase in placements: for<br />

<strong>the</strong> corresponding initial 4 month period to June 30 1982/3 <strong>the</strong> expenditure was<br />

$0.4million in current prices, while in 1983/4 it rose to $23.4 million, and 1984/5 to<br />

$35.1million, before $25.4 million in <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final year <strong>of</strong> operation to December<br />

1985.<br />

An evaluation report was due to be made for AWSS in 1985 (Routley (1984)). However<br />

this never achieved publication. Ross (1988) p48 Charts 1 and 2 and appendix Table <strong>of</strong><br />

Acronyms , noted that having started in March 1983, in December 1985 <strong>the</strong> programme<br />

had already ended by being subsumed into Jobstart. An evaluation for AWSS is not<br />

separately listed amongst <strong>the</strong> BLMR evaluations listed in Mckay and Hope (1986)<br />

Attachment A pp19-21, and it is likely <strong>the</strong> evaluation was sidelined with <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />

that policy interests had already determined <strong>the</strong> programme, at least in name, would end.<br />

Although no general analysis <strong>of</strong> AWSS was made, Edwards (1987) examined <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Wollongong and Newcastle regions <strong>of</strong> New South Wales using a survey <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

5 Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Industrial Relation (1984) Adult <strong>Wage</strong> <strong>Subsidy</strong> Scheme in CES<br />

Operating Manual, Volume 6 section 5; Volume 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!