02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30<br />

2.1 Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> wage subsidy evaluation evidence<br />

The brief overseas review in <strong>the</strong> first chapter showed relatively few evaluations <strong>of</strong> wage<br />

subsidies exist, and empirical evidence for wage subsidies is not well founded. As this<br />

section will show, wage subsidy programs in Australia also have little publicly available<br />

evaluation evidence. Microeconomic evaluation is selected, using individual data,<br />

addressing <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> subsidy leads to better employment experience for<br />

participants after <strong>the</strong> program ends. The evidence is limited to published items that can be<br />

accessed by <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

Only recent evidence is compiled, corresponding approximately to <strong>the</strong> period starting<br />

with <strong>the</strong> 1980’s and onward, since this is <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> later analysis. However it<br />

becomes evident in reviewing <strong>the</strong> literature that in fact most programs only started within<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1970’s, and publicly available evaluation work occurred mostly in <strong>the</strong> mid-1980’s<br />

and l990’s. Paterson (1982) in discussing evaluation activities in Australia pointed out<br />

that “…In Australia government involvement in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> manpower programs is a<br />

relatively new phenomenon. Experience with manpower program evaluation is <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

limited.” (Paterson (1982): 1). The timing <strong>of</strong> this statement marked <strong>the</strong> general beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> evaluation activities and publications.<br />

<strong>Wage</strong> subsidies form only a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> array <strong>of</strong> labour market programs available, and so<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se in turn forms only a small part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>Australian</strong> evaluation<br />

literature available. <strong>Evaluation</strong> evidence for o<strong>the</strong>r program types such as training for<br />

Australia can be found generally reviewed in Webster (1998, 1997a).<br />

Although subsidised apprenticeships were available, for example CRAFT<br />

(Commonwealth Rebate for Apprenticeship Full-time Training), <strong>the</strong>se are not dealt with<br />

as <strong>the</strong>y are deemed to be mostly a training subsidy. 4 Also not covered are programs with<br />

4 In support <strong>of</strong> this, in references such as Kesteven (1987) and Hoy (1983) <strong>the</strong>y are categorized as<br />

education programs. The design did allow for a small amount <strong>of</strong> on-<strong>the</strong>-job training. For example Merrilees<br />

(1984) refers to wage subsidies in CRAFT for this reason, however <strong>the</strong> grand focus was apprenticeship<br />

training.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!