Download pdf - RFSU
Download pdf - RFSU
Download pdf - RFSU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
etween a man and a woman is possible, and that there<br />
exists a well-functioning adult world that the a child does<br />
not have to take responsibility for. Generational boundaries<br />
are maintained and the child can develop on its own<br />
terms. Many of the clients taking part in the <strong>RFSU</strong>-clinic<br />
project have instead grown up in complicated and intense<br />
relationship to one parent who has been either invasive<br />
and demanding or far too inaccessible.<br />
The traumatic experiences of the women in the project<br />
were more evident than those of the men. Many described<br />
clear experiences of physical, psychological or sexual<br />
abuse. This trauma may have been caused by parents<br />
who, because of their own circumstances or difficulties,<br />
consciously or unconsciously abdicated from their parental<br />
roles and abandoned the child. The child may, for different<br />
reasons, have not been allowed to exist in its own right.<br />
Perhaps a parent used the child as an extension of his/her<br />
self, instead of seeing the child as a separate individual<br />
with own needs and feelings. As such the child became<br />
used for the parent’s own desire and satisfaction.<br />
The men have often related a disharmonious upbringing<br />
characterised by conflicts between their parents and<br />
early experiences of being neglected and abandoned. Many<br />
of them also described a very complicated relationships<br />
with their mothers, relationships characterised by high<br />
demands and lack of freedom. They have had a hard time<br />
expressing dissatisfaction, or anger and instead developed<br />
a tendency of trying to please everyone, as if this would<br />
be the only possibility to preserving relationships. The<br />
dominant feeling while growing up seems to have been<br />
abandonment and being left to comfort themselves. Both<br />
groups seemed to lack experience of an early relationship<br />
built on mutual respect for the one another’s inherent<br />
individuality. If anything, their early relationships appeared<br />
to have been characterised by what might be<br />
termed non-meetings.<br />
Sex as an attempt to solve an inner<br />
dilemma<br />
Sexuality is a basic driving force with roots deep in our<br />
biology. In its broadest sense, it is directed towards another<br />
person and seeks union with that person. In contrast to<br />
sexuality stands another driving force - aggression. Rather<br />
than seeking union or affiliation, aggression separates us<br />
from others and helps us to preserve ourselves individually.<br />
A “healthy” aggressiveness is necessary in order to<br />
set boundaries and guard our most necessary needs. As<br />
individuals we must find a balance between these two<br />
forces. On the one hand, we are faced with the need for<br />
union with another person, and on the other hand, the<br />
need to maintain a separate existence. This constitutes<br />
the dynamic hub of all relationships. Some may balance<br />
these forces well. The scales may seriously sway sometimes,<br />
but on the whole both close relationships and a sense of<br />
individuality can be maintained.<br />
For others, such as the men and women who buy and<br />
sell sex, such balance is difficult to achieve. Against a background<br />
of early relational deficits they move between extremes.<br />
They appear to have an intense need to be united,<br />
so intense that union becomes a “melting together” and<br />
becoming one with the other person. Since total union<br />
also means annihilation of the individual, an intense fear<br />
of union also grows. Such a fear can lead towards a sense<br />
of loneliness filled with anxiety and characterised by total<br />
isolation. Both extremes become equally untenable. The<br />
endless nuances and degrees of closeness that should be<br />
23