Cost reduction in the European Banking sector - Roland Berger
Cost reduction in the European Banking sector - Roland Berger
Cost reduction in the European Banking sector - Roland Berger
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
1<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Bank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>sector</strong><br />
Presentation<br />
Paris, July 2012
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
2<br />
Our experts<br />
FABRICE ASVAZADOURIAN<br />
SENIOR PARTNER<br />
CO-HEAD OF GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPETENCE CENTRE<br />
STEPHANE POTIER<br />
PARTNER<br />
FINANCIAL SERVICES CC / HEAD OF OPERATIONS AND IT PRACTICE<br />
EMMANUEL BONNAUD<br />
SENIOR PARTNER<br />
OPERATIONS CC / HEAD OF THE TRANSFORMATION AND RESTRUCTURING PRACTICE
Leverag<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>in</strong>dustrial consult<strong>in</strong>g roots, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> is<br />
a recognized lead<strong>in</strong>g practitioner <strong>in</strong> cost management<br />
ROLAND BERGER'S OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY OFFERING<br />
COST MANAGEMENT IS THE MAIN ACTIVITY FOR<br />
OUR FS CC<br />
>20%<br />
Targeted cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
RESTRUCTURING<br />
LONG TRANSFORMATION<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Orga. streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Competence Center Revenues<br />
100%<br />
100%<br />
10 à<br />
20%<br />
5-<br />
10%<br />
FIT OPERATIONS<br />
(Fast Impact<br />
Transformation)<br />
BUDGET<br />
CUTS<br />
Short term<br />
(6-18 months)<br />
Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g/offshor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Shared service centers<br />
Process simplification<br />
IT Turnaround<br />
LEAN / CONTINUOUS<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
Long Term<br />
(24-36 months)<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>g realization<br />
timeframe<br />
68%<br />
32%<br />
2010<br />
43%<br />
57%<br />
2012 ytd<br />
Efficiency<br />
enhancement<br />
projects<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
3
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
4<br />
Syn<strong>the</strong>sis<br />
> Industry <strong>in</strong>flexion po<strong>in</strong>t on cost : from cost adaptation to cost transformation<br />
> Start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t: Not all banks equal … but too many still unprepared<br />
> New frontier: Performance from simplicity<br />
– Axis 1: Fit operations to remove local <strong>in</strong>efficiencies<br />
– Axis 2: Simplify and delayer organization for stronger accountability<br />
– Axis 3: Simplify bus<strong>in</strong>ess model (offer / manufactur<strong>in</strong>g) for greater agility<br />
> Two-tier approach<br />
– Accelerate/Amplify/Align traditional levers<br />
– Re-<strong>in</strong>vent post-crisis cost models<br />
> Implementation challenges<br />
– Challenge 1: attack<strong>in</strong>g front-office cost-<strong>reduction</strong><br />
– Challenge 2: master<strong>in</strong>g social eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– Challenge 3: address<strong>in</strong>g each bank's governance and leadership issue<br />
– Challenge 4: root<strong>in</strong>g a culture of frugality<br />
> Banks ability to prepare cost model for tomorrow will differentiate w<strong>in</strong>ners from losers
Agenda<br />
Page<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
From cost adaptation to cost transformation 6<br />
It's time for simplicity <strong>in</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g 15<br />
Make it happen: key lessons learnt and success factors 23<br />
© <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
5
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
6<br />
1. From cost adaptation to cost transformation
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> is a key driver for restor<strong>in</strong>g ail<strong>in</strong>g profitability<br />
Average ROE of ma<strong>in</strong> Western <strong>European</strong> Bank<strong>in</strong>g groups<br />
17%<br />
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:<br />
7%<br />
3%<br />
-2 / -3%<br />
4-6%<br />
9-11 %<br />
> Short term cost improvement<br />
and long term simplification<br />
> Diversify fund<strong>in</strong>g solutions and adapt to<br />
domestic r<strong>in</strong>g-fenc<strong>in</strong>g of deposit<br />
TODAY'S<br />
FOCUS<br />
4%<br />
> Redef<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess models of each<br />
activity and adjust bus<strong>in</strong>ess portfolio to<br />
new regulatory constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
2007<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
Nonrecurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
events<br />
Regulatory<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
impacts<br />
Management<br />
actions<br />
2015<br />
Source: Annual reports, 2011 results presentation, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
7
2 scenarios were projected<br />
BASE SCENARIO<br />
> Gradual recovery of <strong>the</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />
– Gradual recovery of economic growth<br />
– Progressive implementation of new regulation<br />
– Limited political impact on taxation and activity<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
– Return to a more stable and fluid fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment<br />
STRESS SCENARIO<br />
> Persistence of a deteriorated bank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment<br />
– "Lost decade" of economic growth<br />
– Rigid implementation of new regulation<br />
– Multiplication of political <strong>in</strong>itiatives with F<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
seen as <strong>the</strong> "enemy"<br />
– Persistence over time of market stress<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
8
Announced plans reflect a turnaround from cost conta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />
to active cost <strong>reduction</strong><br />
Evolution of <strong>European</strong> Banks <strong>Cost</strong>: Income Ratio<br />
70<br />
69%<br />
65<br />
60<br />
Actual CIR<br />
55<br />
-0.5 pt/year<br />
Expected CIR<br />
61%<br />
-1.5 pt/year<br />
55%<br />
0<br />
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016<br />
In a different top l<strong>in</strong>e growth context !<br />
NBI growth/year 3 to 5% +/-1%<br />
Base case :<br />
-10% COSTS<br />
OVER 2012-2016<br />
-40 Bn EUR<br />
Stress case: -17% (-68 Bn EUR)<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> growth/year<br />
2 to 4% -0.5 to.-2.5%<br />
Source: Bloomberg, Broker reports, Annual reports, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
9
Many banks have announced cost <strong>reduction</strong> plans…<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>in</strong>come ratio performance overview & cost <strong>reduction</strong> objectives<br />
CIR evolution<br />
[pts; 2010; 2011]<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
Santander<br />
BBVA<br />
> 6% headcount <strong>reduction</strong><br />
> By end of 2012<br />
> 2.5-3.5 Bn USD<br />
by 2013<br />
Nordea<br />
HSBC<br />
BNPP<br />
Unicredit<br />
Barclays<br />
0 45 50 55 60<br />
65 70<br />
> 770 M€ by 2013<br />
> 8 000 FTE<br />
> Targeted CIR:<br />
> 43% by 2015<br />
Intesa<br />
ING<br />
RBS<br />
> 800M€ by 2015 (300 M€ from purchas<strong>in</strong>g)<br />
> Targeted CIR: 50-53% by 2015<br />
SG<br />
> 1.5 bn€ by 2013-15 (560 M€ from mass lay-offs)<br />
> Targeted CIR: 50% by 2015<br />
> 3.5 bn€ (2009-2011)<br />
> Targeted CIR: 55% by 2013<br />
> 2 bn GBP by 2013<br />
75<br />
> 1,6 Bn€ achieved <strong>in</strong> 2011<br />
> Additional 1.3 Bn€ ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />
through <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
DB<br />
80<br />
Ø 1.8pts<br />
COI<br />
Source: Annual reports, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
10
… yet not all banks are equally prepared<br />
# of banks amongst <strong>European</strong> Top 25 <strong>European</strong> Banks<br />
NOT CLEAR<br />
> Short term cost adaptation plan<br />
announced end 2011<br />
– 2 pts <strong>reduction</strong> target <strong>in</strong> CIR<br />
– Short-term vision (2012-13)<br />
40%<br />
24%<br />
36%<br />
PREPARED<br />
> Ambitious cost transformation plan<br />
announced<br />
– 6-7 pts <strong>reduction</strong> target <strong>in</strong> CIR<br />
– Medium-term vision (2014-15)<br />
PREPARED / WILL IT BE<br />
ENOUGH?<br />
> Modest cost transformation plan<br />
announced<br />
– ~2-5 pts <strong>reduction</strong> target <strong>in</strong> CIR<br />
– Medium-term vision (2014-15)<br />
Source: Annual reports, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
11
Target cost <strong>reduction</strong> varies by country depend<strong>in</strong>g on stress level of<br />
each domestic bank<strong>in</strong>g system as well as social constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
TARGET COST REDUCTION PER COUNTRY<br />
Social constra<strong>in</strong>t (Proxy : OECD Employee Protection Index)<br />
KEY LEVERS PER COUNTRY<br />
Concentration<br />
Levers<br />
-5// -10%<br />
-10 -10/ /-15%<br />
Low<br />
> Restructur<strong>in</strong>g, mergers, branches<br />
closure<br />
(338 ; 2.9)<br />
(441 ; 3.0)<br />
(na; 2.8)<br />
Medium<br />
> Mergers, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, organizational<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
(196 ; 2.4)<br />
OECD Average : 2.1<br />
(547; 2.4)<br />
High<br />
> Organizational <strong>in</strong>tegration, carveouts/outsourc<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
branches closure<br />
(201 ; 1.6)<br />
Very high<br />
> Offshor<strong>in</strong>g, out-sourc<strong>in</strong>g, Front-office<br />
productivity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> City of London<br />
-10 / -15% -15 / -20%<br />
-10 / -15% (251 ; 1.1)<br />
-15 / -20%<br />
Low<br />
> Productivity, carve-out/outsourc<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terbank alliances<br />
Stress level (Proxy : 5Y CDS)<br />
X / Y %<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> target to be achieved<br />
(xxx ; x.xx) Average CDS 5Y by country base on Banks' headquarter / OECD Employee Protection Strictnes Index (0-6 scale)<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
12
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
13<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> targets and ma<strong>in</strong> efficiency levers to activate varies<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g also to bus<strong>in</strong>ess l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
POSITIONING OF BUSINESS LINES DEPENDING<br />
ON THE ENVIRONMENT<br />
Social constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />
-5 / -10%<br />
Retail<br />
Support<br />
functions<br />
-10 / -15%<br />
KEY LEVERS PER BUSINESS LINE<br />
Retail<br />
SFS<br />
> Delayer<strong>in</strong>g, carve-outs/JVs, branch<br />
clos<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> Offer simplification, IT consolidation,<br />
merger<br />
Asset & Wealth<br />
Management<br />
SFS<br />
CIB<br />
> Front Office productivity,<br />
offshor<strong>in</strong>g/carve-outs, front-to-back<br />
process streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
CIB<br />
-10 / -15% -15 / -20%<br />
Asset &<br />
Wealth Mgt<br />
Support<br />
functions<br />
> Front Office productivity, BO<br />
outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dustrialization<br />
> Renunciation, organizational<br />
consolidation and shared services,<br />
offshor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
X / Y %<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> target to<br />
be achieved<br />
Stress level
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
14<br />
Pressure will be primarily put on support functions and external<br />
suppliers<br />
Source of sav<strong>in</strong>gs and relative effort by cost nature<br />
Effort 1)<br />
HR - Support<br />
10%<br />
15%<br />
-15%<br />
(-20%)<br />
BANK HR COSTS : 50% OF SAVINGS<br />
HR - BO/FO<br />
48%<br />
35%<br />
-7%<br />
(-15%)<br />
(-55% <strong>in</strong> Stress Scenario)<br />
vs. 58% of cost base<br />
IT<br />
Real Estate<br />
External expenses<br />
15%<br />
12%<br />
15%<br />
19%<br />
10%<br />
22%<br />
-12%<br />
(-20%)<br />
-8%<br />
(-12%)<br />
-15%<br />
(-20%)<br />
EXTERNAL COSTS : 50% OF SAVINGS<br />
(-45% <strong>in</strong> Stress Scenario)<br />
vs . 42% of cost base<br />
<strong>Cost</strong> structure<br />
1) % of cost base –Base Scenario (Stress Scenario)<br />
Source of sav<strong>in</strong>gs
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
15<br />
2. It is time for simplicity <strong>in</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
16<br />
In many o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries, <strong>the</strong> <strong>reduction</strong> of complexity has been<br />
a major performance enhancer<br />
INCREASING COMPLEXITY<br />
IN FINANCIAL SERVICES<br />
EXAMPLE OF A COST TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY - TELECOM<br />
> Successive phases <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
complexity<br />
– Before 2008 : "Growth" (new<br />
products, new geographical<br />
areas, new activities)<br />
– After 2008 : "Regulatory<br />
Response" (staked <strong>in</strong>itiatives,<br />
budget cuts, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
resources)<br />
> Internal organization more and<br />
more complex<br />
– Additional standards<br />
– Matrix form of organization<br />
– Stack of managerial levels (HQ,<br />
activities, entities, bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
units, …)<br />
– …<br />
1<br />
Productivity<br />
Achieved (2004)<br />
> OPEX sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
EUR 2 bn<br />
> Headcount<br />
<strong>reduction</strong><br />
26,400 FTE<br />
2<br />
Simplify<br />
Achieved (2007)<br />
> OPEX sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
EUR 1.8 bn<br />
> Headcount<br />
<strong>reduction</strong><br />
20,000 FTE<br />
3<br />
Sp<strong>in</strong>-off<br />
Achieved (2010)<br />
> OPEX sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
EUR 3 bn<br />
> Sp<strong>in</strong>-off of<br />
45,000 FTE
LEVERS<br />
New frontier: The quest for simplicity to reach <strong>the</strong> next level of<br />
structural cost performance<br />
PERFORMANCE FROM SIMPLICITY<br />
1<br />
FIT<br />
2<br />
STREAMLINE<br />
3<br />
OPERATIONS<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
> Renunciation<br />
> Productivity<br />
> Skills alignment<br />
> Delayer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> Suppress<strong>in</strong>g<br />
overlaps<br />
> Elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
“embedded<br />
support”<br />
REFOCUS<br />
FOOTPRINT<br />
> Reduction of<br />
Product / Channel<br />
variety<br />
> Carve-outs and<br />
outsourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> Consolidation<br />
& shared services<br />
EFFICIENT ACCOUNTABLE AGILE<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consutlants<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
17
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
18<br />
1<br />
FIT OPERATIONS<br />
FIT Operations: high level of cost <strong>in</strong>efficiencies rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at a "shop<br />
floor" level<br />
KEY FIT SPECIFIC LEVERS<br />
ILLUSTRATION - FIT OPERATIONS PROJECT<br />
Renunciation<br />
> Not do<strong>in</strong>g it<br />
Illustration - Source of sav<strong>in</strong>gs of a FIT Operations project (%)<br />
Streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Standardization<br />
Simplification<br />
Skills alignment<br />
Self care<br />
> Do<strong>in</strong>g it once<br />
> Do<strong>in</strong>g it one way<br />
> Do<strong>in</strong>g it simpler<br />
> Do<strong>in</strong>g it cheaper<br />
> Let <strong>the</strong> user /<br />
customer do it<br />
Automation<br />
Mutualization<br />
Renunciation<br />
Process simplification /<br />
Standardization<br />
Skills adjusmtent<br />
26<br />
6<br />
33<br />
TOTAL 100<br />
18<br />
17.4%<br />
cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
16<br />
1/3 with classic<br />
levers<br />
(18-36 months)<br />
2/3 with FIT<br />
specific<br />
levers<br />
(6-18 months)
% of managers<br />
% of managers<br />
2<br />
STREAMLINE ORGANIZATION<br />
Many banks are now flatten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir structure<br />
MANAGEMENT WEIGHT FOR SUPPORT FUNCTIONS<br />
Span of control [# of employees per manager]<br />
HIERARCHICAL LEVELS WITHIN SUPPORT<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Width of hierarchy [# of hierarchical level]<br />
84% 16%<br />
0%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
55% 23% 21%<br />
2%<br />
Average ratio = 5,1<br />
Targeted ratio= 7 - 9<br />
5 10 15 20<br />
Ratio<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />
Hierarchical levels<br />
Workforce : 2020<br />
Weighted average= 4,4<br />
20%+ of potential <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> # of managers<br />
Simplification by remov<strong>in</strong>g one hierarchical level<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants experience<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
19
3<br />
REFOCUS FOOTPRINT<br />
Product portfolio simplification: reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> complexity of <strong>the</strong><br />
offer<strong>in</strong>g to slim down <strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
MAKING PRODUCTS EASY TO EXPLAIN<br />
FOR EMPLOYEES...<br />
> Products are clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guished and have little overlap<br />
> Employee is able to give <strong>the</strong> customer good advice<br />
Example: strong <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> mortgage offer<strong>in</strong>g complexity<br />
by look<strong>in</strong>g at all parameters<br />
... AND EASY TO CHOOSE FOR CUSTOMERS<br />
Example : ABN AMRO<br />
> Product characteristics and differences between products are easy<br />
to understand<br />
> Customer can make an <strong>in</strong>dependent choice when desired<br />
Reduction from 10% to 90% across product<br />
silo's will be achieved<br />
Loans<br />
Down payment<br />
methods<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
From 9 to 1<br />
type<br />
From 7 to 5<br />
methods<br />
17<br />
-24%<br />
13<br />
10<br />
-10%<br />
9<br />
9<br />
-56%<br />
4<br />
8<br />
-13%<br />
7<br />
9<br />
-89%<br />
1<br />
7<br />
-29%<br />
5<br />
Interest period<br />
<br />
<br />
From 14 to 6<br />
periods<br />
Current<br />
Account<br />
Package<br />
Before<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
After<br />
Securities<br />
Loans<br />
Mortgages<br />
Fiscal Sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Source: Producten Anno Nu presentation, March 2011<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
20
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
21<br />
6<br />
REFOCUS FOOTPRINT<br />
Expect off-shor<strong>in</strong>g, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, carve-out, sp<strong>in</strong>-off to be high on<br />
CEO agenda<br />
Type of carve-out model<br />
MODEL<br />
Competence<br />
shar<strong>in</strong>g Sourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
optimization<br />
DESCRIPTION<br />
> A bank leverages technical know how of<br />
an IT/ vendor partner<br />
> Industrial JV with access to cheaper<br />
resources<br />
EXAMPLE<br />
> IT Infrastructure<br />
> Retail bank<strong>in</strong>g services<br />
Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a Third Party<br />
Volume<br />
Consolidation<br />
Commercial JV<br />
: High<br />
: Low<br />
> A bank sells its assets and teams to a<br />
provider benefitt<strong>in</strong>g from scale effect<br />
> <strong>Cost</strong>s variabilization and access to best of<br />
breed systems and processes<br />
> Two bank<strong>in</strong>g groups jo<strong>in</strong>t forces to share<br />
large volumes<br />
> Scale effect / Investment shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> A bank carves-out a BO with a service<br />
provider that markets <strong>the</strong> service to banks<br />
> Banks br<strong>in</strong>gs bus<strong>in</strong>ess competence, partner<br />
provides <strong>in</strong>dustrialisation and commercial<br />
knowhow<br />
> Investor Services (SS, AM, Insurance)<br />
> Support functions<br />
> IT Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
> Investor Services<br />
> Payment (post-paid)<br />
> Consumer F<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
> Structured F<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
> Capital Markets<br />
> Payment (pre-paid)<br />
Monte Paschi di Senna just announced <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g of its entire Back-Office
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
22<br />
3. Make it happen: lessons learnt and success factors
Start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t: significant hurdles to overcome<br />
BANKS HANDICAPS<br />
DIMENSIONS<br />
Handicap<br />
Neutral<br />
Accelerator<br />
COST CULTURE<br />
SOCIAL FACTORS<br />
COST VARIABILITY<br />
COST OF<br />
REGULATION<br />
LEVEL OF STRESS<br />
BANKS FACE A GREAT COST<br />
TRANSFORMATION CHALLENGE<br />
> High cost <strong>reduction</strong> ambitions (60/72% of banks<br />
with CIR decrease targets more than thrice/twice<br />
past 15 years achievements)<br />
> Start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t with many handicaps compared<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />
> Limited time / High market pressure<br />
Banks Automotive Telco<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> Strategy Consultants analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
23
SAVINGS<br />
Th<strong>in</strong>k ahead: from cost adaptation to cost transformation<br />
ARE YOU WELL PREPARED?<br />
DESIGN A 3-STEP COST TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY<br />
Review of cost-related announcement<br />
of top 25 <strong>European</strong> banks<br />
UNPREPARED?<br />
WELL PREPARED<br />
High<br />
25%<br />
Re<strong>in</strong>vent<br />
<strong>the</strong> cost model<br />
38%<br />
38%<br />
Accelerate / Amplify /<br />
Align (AAA)<br />
conventional levers<br />
15%<br />
25%<br />
Remove local<br />
<strong>in</strong>efficiencies<br />
PREPARED BUT WILL IT BE ENOUGH?<br />
Low<br />
TIME<br />
Source : Annual reports, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
24
Execution is k<strong>in</strong>g: The effective delivery of cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs will<br />
differentiate post crisis w<strong>in</strong>ners from losers.<br />
POST-MORTEM OF A COST PROGRAM ONE YEAR AFTER LAUNCH<br />
KEY SUCCESS FACTORS<br />
100<br />
5<br />
-36%<br />
> Relentless sponsor<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> top<br />
management<br />
> Partial sav<strong>in</strong>gs recognition<br />
> Restriction of shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
opportunities (shared<br />
services…)<br />
> Low mobilization<br />
27<br />
14 64<br />
> Mobilization of middle managers<br />
around a long term vision and clear<br />
action plans/priorities<br />
> Well designed social eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
realize sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Initial target<br />
> Limited <strong>in</strong>vestment capacity<br />
> Inadequate availability of resources<br />
> Insufficient social eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> Inefficient governance<br />
Additional target<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>gs to be<br />
validated by<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess units<br />
Delay<br />
Adjusted target<br />
> Change management to <strong>in</strong>still a cost<br />
culture<br />
> Rigorous program management and<br />
sav<strong>in</strong>gs track<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Source: <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> experience<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
25
Front Office won't be "sacred cows"<br />
PERSPECTIVES BY ACTIVITY<br />
CIB<br />
Retail<br />
SFS<br />
W & AM<br />
> Pressure on compensation<br />
> Front office delayer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
> Branch network optimization<br />
> Leverage of remote channels<br />
> Acquisition costs decrease<br />
> Service level adjustment for<br />
partners<br />
> Productivity of front-office<br />
> Review of external distribution<br />
value shar<strong>in</strong>g scheme<br />
1) Based on total of ~240,000 branches <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> Western Europe<br />
Source: ECB, EFMA, Febelf<strong>in</strong>, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
ILLUSTRATION: BRANCH NETWORK PER MILLION<br />
INHABITANTS IN WESTERN EUROPE [#]<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Selection of key countries<br />
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
France<br />
Italy<br />
Germany<br />
Sweden<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
> 15-20,000 potential branch closures by 2016 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base case<br />
or -6/8% 1) (vs. -30-35,000 closures <strong>in</strong> stress case or -12/14%)<br />
– Inflexion po<strong>in</strong>t versus historic trend (+1.2% between 2000/10)<br />
UK<br />
Potential<br />
decrease vs.<br />
historic (est.)<br />
++<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
+<br />
+<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
26
A complex social equation<br />
BANKS WORKFORCE IN WESTERN EUROPE ['000 EMPLOYEES]<br />
COMMENTS<br />
2.988<br />
2004<br />
1,1% p.a.<br />
2.983<br />
2005<br />
3.027<br />
2006<br />
3.084<br />
2007<br />
3.072<br />
2008<br />
-0,7% p.a.<br />
(-90 000)<br />
3.021<br />
2009<br />
2.994<br />
2010<br />
2.994<br />
2011<br />
2012<br />
Base case :<br />
-1.0% p.a.<br />
(-180,000)<br />
2013<br />
2014<br />
> Workforce will decrease back to early-2000 level<br />
> Indirect job losses at suppliers should be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same range<br />
> Stress-scenario would double <strong>the</strong> projected impact<br />
1) 380 000 bank employees <strong>in</strong> France, 18% 55+ years old <strong>in</strong> 2010<br />
2015<br />
2016<br />
> Pressure on compensation<br />
– Bonus pool<br />
– Base salary evolution<br />
> Pressure on suppliers<br />
– IT providers<br />
– Consultants<br />
– Facility/service providers<br />
– Employment agencies/Temps<br />
> Social eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– Recruit<strong>in</strong>g slowdown /<br />
Non replacement of retirements<br />
– Internalization<br />
– Internal mobility promotion<br />
– Carve-out / Sp<strong>in</strong>-off<br />
– Social plans<br />
Source: <strong>European</strong> Bank<strong>in</strong>g Federation, <strong>Roland</strong> <strong>Berger</strong> analysis<br />
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
27
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
28<br />
Which obstacles for change now ?<br />
"What makes us hesitate is not <strong>the</strong> difficulty of th<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
but th<strong>in</strong>gs are difficult because we hesitate to tackle <strong>the</strong>m"<br />
Senèque<br />
"Social cohesion is done at <strong>the</strong> expense of truth"<br />
Jeff Bezos, Amazon CEO
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
29<br />
Our advice for <strong>European</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g executives as <strong>the</strong>y are start<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir cost transformation journey<br />
> In <strong>the</strong> midst of a crisis, do<strong>in</strong>g noth<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> worst possible choice<br />
> If you are <strong>in</strong> a bad situation, <strong>the</strong> right decisions often make th<strong>in</strong>gs worse before<br />
<strong>the</strong>y get better<br />
> Navigat<strong>in</strong>g out of a crisis requires courageous, non-consensus leadership<br />
> Once you have addressed <strong>the</strong> issue, th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>variably get better more quickly<br />
than you expect<br />
> If you prepare for <strong>the</strong> worst, surprises will generally be positive
Bank<strong>in</strong>g_cost_<strong>reduction</strong>_FINAL_270712.pptx<br />
30<br />
It's character<br />
that<br />
creates<br />
impact!