comprehensive site investigation and remediation objectives report

ILLINOIS SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM 

COMPREHENSIVE SITE 

INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION 

OBJECTIVES REPORT 

PROJECT SITE: 

SPARTANS' SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER 

NWC ILLINOIS ROUTE 53 & ALEXANDER CIRCLE 

(3-23 TERRACE LANE, 615-625 ACCESS DRIVE) 

ROMEOVILLE, ILLINOIS 

IEPA BOL SITE NO. 1970905180 

PREPARED FOR: 

VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE 

13 MONTROSE DRIVE 

ROMEOVILLE, ILLINOIS 60446 

PREPARED BY: 

V3 COMPANIES 

120 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1550 

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 

312.419.1985 

MAY 21, 2010

This report has been prepared by V3 Companies (V3), on behalf of the Remediation Applicant, 

in conformance with the requirements of 35 IAC Sections 740.425, 740.440 and 740.445 for the 

purpose of documenting the Comprehensive Site Investigation and Remediation Objectives 

Report. 

Prepared by: 

Jeff Paddock, P.G. 

Project Geologist 

Kristine J. Wright 

Environmental Scientist 

Reviewed by: 

Rachael K. Berthiaume, P.E, LEED AP 

Project Manager 

Keith R. Oswald, P.E. 

Director Environment & Geosciences 

Comprehensive Site Investigation Report 

V3 Companies, ii 

Spartans’ Square Shopping Center May 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................... VI 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................1 

1.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 1 

1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION............................................................................. 1 

2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................3 

2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION........................................................... 3 

2.2 SOURCES REVIEWED .................................................................................. 3 

2.3 SITE HISTORY ............................................................................................... 4 

2.4 TOPOGRAPHY............................................................................................... 5 

2.5 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY.............................................................. 5 

2.5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ................................................................................ 5 

2.5.2 REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY ...................................................................... 6 

2.5.3 SITE GEOLOGY......................................................................................... 6 

2.5.4 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY............................................................................... 7 

2.5.5 WATER WELL SURVEY .............................................................................. 8 

2.6 CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USE............................................................ 9 

2.7 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS............................................................ 10 

2.7.1 SITE INVESTIGATION COMPLETION REPORT, FORMER CLARK 

STORE (EAST ADJACENT PROPERTY) SITE INVESTIGATION 

COMPLETION REPORT, AUGUST 2007 ............................................ 10 

2.7.2 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, FEBRUARY 2008 10 

2.7.3 V3 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, FEBRUARY 

2008 ..................................................................................................... 11 

2.7.4 PASSIVE SOIL GAS SURVEY, AUGUST 2008.................................... 11 

2.7.5 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS AND DATA 

RELIANCE ........................................................................................... 12 

3.0 SITE-SPECIFIC SAMPLING PLAN .....................................................13 

3.1 SITE RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .............................. 13 

3.2 SAMPLING OBJECTIVES ............................................................................ 13 

3.3 INVESTIGATION MONITORING AND EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 14 

3.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATION DERIVED MATERIALS.................... 14 

3.5 SOIL SAMPLING .......................................................................................... 14 

3.6 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND DEVELOPMENT ..................... 15 

3.7 GROUNDWATER / MONITORING WELL SAMPLING................................. 16 

3.8 LABORATORY METHODOLOGIES ............................................................. 17 

4.0 DOCUMENTATION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES ..................................19 

4.1 SOIL SAMPLING .......................................................................................... 19 

4.2 GROUNDWATER / MONITORING WELL SAMPLING................................. 19 

4.3 REC 1 – FORMER DRY CLEANING OPERATIONS.................................... 20 

4.4 REC 2 – HYDRAULIC LIFTS ........................................................................ 20 

4.5 REC 3 – EAST ADJACENT GAS STATION ................................................. 21 

5.0 ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT ..............................................22 


V3 Companies, iii 


5.1 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN (COCS)................................................... 22 

5.2 DISTRIBUTION / NATURE OF CONTAMINATION ...................................... 23 

5.3 SITE RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (REDEFINED) ...... 24 

6.0 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES EVALUATION...............................25 

6.1 BASELINE TACO EVALUATION (PRE-REMEDIATION) ............................. 25 

6.2 BASELINE TACO CONDITIONS .................................................................. 26 

6.2.1 MIGRATION PATHWAYS, EXPOSURE ROUTES AND RECEPTORS................... 26 

6.2.2 GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION ............................................................. 27 

6.3 TACO TIER 1 EVALUATION ........................................................................ 27 

6.3.1 VOCS IMPACTS FROM FORMER DRY CLEANING OPERATIONS.................... 28 

6.3.2 METALS IN GROUNDWATER ..................................................................... 29 

6.4 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 29 

7.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................31 

8.0 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AFFIRMATION............33 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Figure 1.1 

Figure 1.2 

Figure 1.3 

Figure 2.1 

Figure 2.2 

Figure 3.1 

Figure 3.2 

Figure 3.3 

Figure 3.4 

Site Location Map 

Site Vicinity Map 

Site Base Map 

Groundwater Contour Map 

Water Well Survey Map 

REC Identification Map 

Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Location Map 

Tier 1 Soil Exceedance Map 

Class I Groundwater Exceedance Map 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 1.1 

Table 2.1 

Table 2.2 

Table 2.3 

Table 2.4 

Table 2.5 

Table 3.1 

Table 3.2 

Summary of Soil and Groundwater Samples above TACO Tier 1 ROs 

Soil Analytical Results (VOCs) 

Soil Analytical Results (SVOCs) 

Soil Analytical Results (Metals) 

Soil Analytical Results (Pesticides/PCBs) 

Soil Analytical Results (Organic Matter) 

Groundwater Analytical Results (VOCs) 

Groundwater Analytical Results (SVOCs, Pest/PCBs, Inorganics) 


V3 Companies, iv 


APPENDICES 

Appendix A Historical Documentation 

A.1 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Investigation Completion Report, August 2007 

A.2 V3 Phase I Environmental Assessment, February 13, 2008 

A.3 V3 Phase II Environmental Assessment, February 6, 2008 

A.4 Passive Soil-Gas Survey, August 27, 2008 

Appendix B 

Appendix C 

Appendix D 

Well Survey Documentation 

Soil Boring & Well Construction Logs 

Photographic Documentation 

Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Reports 

E.1 Lab Accreditations and Certifications 

E.2 Lab Reports, V3 

Appendix F Protocols 

F.1 Chain of Custody Protocol 

F.2 Decontamination Activities Protocol 

F.3 Direct Push Drilling and Soil Sampling Protocol 

F.4 Hand Auger Soil Sampling Protocol 

F.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Development Protocol 

F.6 Groundwater Sampling Protocols for Temporary Wells 

F.7 Low-flow Groundwater Sampling Protocol 


V3 Companies, v 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

V3 Companies (V3) has prepared this Comprehensive Site Investigation and Remediation 

Objectives Report (CSI/ROR) (the “Report”) on behalf of the City of Romeoville, the 

Remediation Applicant (RA), for the remediation site referred to as Spartans’ Square Shopping 

Center (Site), located at the northwest corner of Illinois Route 53 and Alexander Circle, in 

Romeoville, Illinois. This Report, along with the proposed remediation objectives (ROs), 

provides the basis for the RA’s pursuit of a “comprehensive’ No Further Remediation (NFR) 

letter for the Site. 

Background 

The Site was enrolled in the Site Remediation Program (SRP) in August 2008 under the name 

Spartans’ Square Shopping Center. The RA and owner is the City of Romeoville. The purpose 

of the enrollment is to secure a “comprehensive” NFR letter. Currently, the property is occupied 

with multiple commercial tenants. In the future, the property will be redeveloped and remain 

commercial use as part of the Romeoville Downtown Master Plan. 

From January 2008 to May 2009, V3 compiled historical data and performed several subsurface 

investigations at the Site. This report addresses the site characterization, remediation 

objectives and a “pre-remediation” TACO evaluation performed in pursuit of a comprehensive 

NFR letter for the Site. 

Current and Future Land Use 

The Site is currently occupied by Spartans’ Square Shopping Center, a 57,187 square foot, one 

story strip mall built from 1961-1971. Spartans’ Square Shopping Center is currently occupied 

by a restaurant (Subway), a self serve Laundromat (Laundromat), several salons, a currency 

exchange and a True Value hardware store. The intended reuse of the Site is retail 

development as part of the Romeoville Downtown Master Plan. 

Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) 

The RECs identified by V3 in the Phase I ESA have been condensed into the following RECs 

that possibly impact the Site: 

REC 1 – Former Dry Cleaning Operations: This REC addresses the possible impacts 

to the Site from a former dry cleaner that operated in the space where Mrs. Clean 

Laundromat is currently located. Mrs. Clean Laundromat is strictly a laundromat and dry 

cleaning operations are not currently conducted on-site. 

REC 2 – Hydraulic Lifts: This REC addresses possible impacts from three out-of-use 

hydraulic lifts located on the south side of the former grocery store and current hardware 

store. 

REC 3 – East Adjacent Gas Station: This REC addresses possible soil and 

groundwater impacts from the off-site east adjacent Phillips 66 Gas Station (Former 

Clark Station and LUST site) to the northeast corner of the Site. 


V3 Companies, vi 


The far northeast Former Clark Station is not considered a REC for the Site based on its 

distance from the Remediation Site and the direction of groundwater flow to the southeast. 

Site Investigation 

The Site investigation includes a Phase I ESA and a comprehensive site investigation (CSI) 

conducted from January 2008 through May 2009 by V3. Based on an evaluation of available 

Site data, a Site-Specific Sampling Plan was developed to obtain the data necessary to 

accomplish the following objectives: 

• Evaluate environmental conditions at each of the identified Site RECs, 

• Obtain comprehensive analytical data throughout the Site, and refine the list of COCs, 

• Enable a comparison of site data to applicable TACO Tier 1 ROs, 

• Evaluate potential pathway exclusions, including potential contaminant source and free 

product, and 

• Enable the development of Tier 2 ROs, as applicable. 

The CSI indicates concentrations of VOC impacts in soils and VOCs and metals in groundwater. 

The purpose of the comprehensive site investigation was to characterize Site conditions. 

Site Recognized Environmental Conditions (Redefined): Based upon the findings of the field 

observations and laboratory sample analysis, V3 has not identified impacts associated with 

REC 2 and REC 3. As a result, V3 has redefined the three previously defined Site RECs as two 

RECs: 

• VOCs Impacts from Former Dry Cleaning Operations: This includes soil and 

groundwater VOC impacts that likely resulted from former dry cleaners operations at the 

Site. 

• Metals in Groundwater: This included metals groundwater impacts identified in two 

wells sampled on the southeast side of the Site. 

Site COCs: The CSI includes a delineation of the vertical and horizontal extent of COCs. The 

confirmed Site COCs include: 

• Metals (groundwater) 

‣ Four metals (aluminum, iron, lead and manganese) have been identified in 

groundwater in excess of Tier 1 RO at two wells. However, it is not apparent that the 

encountered concentrations represent a notable groundwater concern, and may be 

the result of relatively high suspended solids within collected samples. 

‣ The exposure pathway of concern for metals is only the Tier 1 direct groundwater 

ingestion route. 

• VOCs (soil and groundwater) 

‣ VOCs were identified in excess of Tier 1 ROs in multiple soil samples and monitoring 

wells. Identified PCE concentrations and its daughter products are due to former dry 

cleaning operations. Chloroform is also identified as a historical dry cleaning solvent. 

However, the presence of chloroform, bromodichloromethane, and bromoform could 

be the result of disinfection byproducts of drinking water or laboratory standard 

reagents for analysis, unrelated to the Site. BTEX was not identified in the laboratory 

analysis above Tier 1 ROs, only one low detection of toluene was noted. 


V3 Companies, vii 


‣ The exposure pathways of concern are Tier 1 soil ingestion, inhalation, soil 

component of the groundwater ingestion route and direct groundwater ingestion. 

Pesticides and PCBs were eliminated as Site COCs based on a review of historic environmental 

assessments, Site operations and available investigation data, which indicate no evidence of 

these constituents above Tier 1 ROs. Pesticides were also eliminated from consideration based 

on historical data that did not indicate evidence of their release or illegal disposal at the Site. 

PNAs were eliminated in soil because there were no detections above Tier 1 ROs. PNAs in 

groundwater from historic well (MW-10) were identified in 2006, but V3 re-sampled the well in 

2010 and PNAs did not exceed Tier 1 groundwater ROs. Refer to discussions and data found 

in Sections 2.7.4, Tables 2.1 to 2.4 (soils) and Tables 3.1 to 3.2 (groundwater). 

Remediation Objectives Evaluation 

The first phase of a TACO evaluation is to determine if complete exposure routes exist pursuant 

to Title 35 of Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 742.300 (Subpart C: Exposure Route 

Evaluation). Where a complete exposure pathway (source – transport – availability for 

exposure – receptor) does not exist, development of ROs for that exposure route is not 

required. An exposure route evaluation was accomplished on a constituent group specific basis 

for each Recognized Environmental Condition (REC). 

Evaluation of Site data indicates that conditions in the RECs achieve the TACO Subpart C 

criteria for demonstrating that source material is not present, with one exception. The evaluation 

of Site data indicates the following: 

• Soil attenuation capacity, as measured by the conservative TACO default value of 0.2% 

(2,000 mg/kg), has not been exceeded when compared to the sum of organics in each 

boring (see Tables 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4). 

• Soil does not exhibit pH values less than or equal to 2.0 or greater than or equal to 12.5 

(see Table 2.3). 

• There is no evidence of hazardous metals at the Site (investigation did not identify the 

presence of RCRA metals as COCs). See Table 2.3. 

• No characteristics of reactivity have been identified (see Table 2.3). 

• There is no evidence of PCBs in soil in excess of 50 parts per million at the Site 

(investigation did not identify PCBs as COCs). See Table 2.4 for documentation. 

• The soil saturation limits for each COC have not been exceeded, with the exception of a 

concentration of 800 mg/kg of tetrachloroethene at SM-GP-108 (8-11) that exceeds the 

limit of 240 mg/kg. As a result, this area will require remedial efforts to allow exclusion of 

exposure pathways. 

• Field observations did not indicate the presence of “free product” or COC saturated soil. 

As a result of the above, pathway exclusion, with the noted exception, is allowable per IAC 

Section 742.300 (Subpart C: Exposure Route Evaluation). 

Remediation Objectives 

The following ROs are proposed for the Site: 

‣ Tier 1 Industrial-Commercial and Construction Worker ROs for the soil inhalation and 

ingestion exposure pathways and Class I groundwater ingestion ROs. 


V3 Companies, viii 


‣ Tier 2 soil component of the Class I groundwater ingestion and Tier 2 Class I direct 

ingestion groundwater ROs on-site. A groundwater use restriction at the Site will move 

the compliance point to the Site boundaries. A post-remediation TACO evaluation, 

including Tier 2 simulations, will demonstrate Tier 2 site-specific ROs and residual 

concentrations are protective (e.g., Tier 1, Class I direct ingestion groundwater ROs are 

achieved.) The post-remediation Tier 2 will be documented in a future Remedial Action 

Completion Report. 

Institutional Controls 

Institutional controls will be placed on the Site that would: 

• Restrict subsurface construction and maintenance (in specified areas) to qualified 

personnel (i.e., in accordance with applicable OSHA regulations) via construction worker 

notification; 

• Restrict groundwater usage at the Site utilizing the existing groundwater ordinance; 

• Maintain barriers to exclude exposure routes as applicable to specified areas of 

ingestion and inhalation, as necessary. 

Based on the approval of Tier 1 and 2 evaluations and the successful implementation of 

remedial measures and institutional controls, the Site can qualify for comprehensive NFR 

determination. 


V3 Companies, ix 


1.0 INTRODUCTION 

V3 Companies has prepared this Comprehensive Site Investigation Report (CSIR) on behalf of 

the Village of Romeoville, the Remediation Applicant (RA), for the remediation site referred to as 

the Spartans’ Square Shopping Center (Site). The Site is located at the northwest corner of 

Illinois Route 53 and Alexander Circle, in Romeoville, Illinois, as depicted in Figures 1.1 and 

1.2. The CSI/ROR, provided herein, has been developed in conformance with the requirements 

of 35 Illinois Administration Code (IAC) Part 740 Section 740.425, 740.440 and 740.445 to 

accomplish the following: 

• Complete the presentation of site characterization data; 

• Present remediation objectives (ROs) for soil and groundwater developed in accordance 

with 35 IAC Part 742 - Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO). 

The site investigation and data evaluation described within this CSIR has been performed to 

support SRP closure of the Site in accordance with 35 IAC Part 740. This CSIR provides the 

basis for the RA’s pursuit of a comprehensive No Further Remediation (NFR) letter for the Site. 

The following sections provide a brief background related to the Site’s SRP enrollment and the 

organization of this report. 

1.1 BACKGROUND 

The Site was enrolled in the Site Remediation Program (SRP) in August 2008 under the name 

Spartans’ Square Shopping Center. The RA and owner is the Village of Romeoville. The 

purpose of the enrollment is to secure a “comprehensive” NFR letter. Currently, the property is 

occupied with multiple commercial tenants. In the future, the property will be redeveloped as 

commercial complex as part of the Romeoville Downtown Master Plan. 

From January 2008 to May 2009, V3 compiled historical data and performed several subsurface 

investigations at the Site. This report addresses the site characterization, remediation 

objectives and a “pre-remediation” TACO evaluation performed in pursuit of a comprehensive 

NFR letter for the Site. 

1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION 

The following sections of the report are organized in the following manner: 

Section 2 – Site Characterization: Provides a description of the Site, the sources reviewed 

in developing the CSIR, a summary of the Site’s history, physical setting, geology and 

hydrogeology, current and future land use, and previous site investigations. Much of this 

section describes the information evaluated and used as a basis for developing the Site 

Investigation described in Sections 3 and 4. 

Section 3 – Site-Specific Sampling Plan: Summarizes the recognized environmental 

conditions (RECs) identified at the Site and their basis, the sampling objectives, methods 

and methodologies (field and laboratory) of the CSIR. 

Comprehensive Site Investigation Report V3 Companies, 1 


Section 4 – Documentation of Field Activities: Documents the performance of the field 

activities related to the Site Investigation, and summarizes this information for each 

respective REC. 

Section 5 – Endangerment Assessment: Provides an assessment of field observations and 

laboratory results, including the significant physical features of the Site and the general 

distribution, nature, degree and extent of site contamination for each respective REC. The 

assessment is also used (as necessary) to more specifically define (or revise) Site RECs. 

Section 6 – Remediation Objectives Evaluation: Discusses RECs, COCs, potential receptors 

and exposure pathways. This section presents any potential exposure route exclusions and 

provides a brief “pre-remediation” TACO evaluation, including a discussion of applicable 

exposure routes and related evaluations, and then discusses the Tier 1 and Tier 2 

Remediation Objectives (ROs) selected for closure of the Site are also discussed. The 

section briefly discusses those areas requiring remediation, as well as the institutional 

controls required to achieve specified site ROs. 

Section 7 – Conclusions: Summarizes the findings of the CSI/ROR, and provides a 

discussion of proposed remedial actions at the Site based on these findings, the RA’s goals 

and the planned future use of the Site. It is intended this section provide a general roadmap 

of the RA’s plans for resolving the identified Site RECs, as they relate to the intended reuse 

of the Site. 

Section 8 – Licensed Professional Engineer (LPE) Affirmation: Affirmation by the LPE 

directing the investigation and remediation of the Site. 

Together the aforementioned sections of the report are intended to satisfy the requirements of 

35 IAC Section 740.420, 740.425, 740.440 and 740.445 to provide a complete presentation of 

historical data and investigations related to the Site. 



2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 

2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 

The Site consists of approximately 2.4-acres of land currently occupied by Spartans’ Square 

Shopping Center. It is located in Section 27 and 34, Township 37 North, Range 10 East of the 

Third Principal Meridian, Will County, Illinois (Figure 1.1). The current layout of the Site and the 

surrounding area is presented in Figure 1.2. The addresses at the Site include 3 to 23 Terrace 

Lane and 615 to 625 Access Drive. 

Spartans’ Square Shopping Center consists of a one story, 57,187-square-foot brick building 

with a concrete slab-on-grade foundation built from 1961-1971 (Figure 1.3). An asphalt parking 

lot is located in the north portion of the Site. Terrace Lane and Access Drive are located on-Site 

along the north and east side of the building, respectively, and provide vehicular access to the 

Site. IL Route 53 is east of the Site and Alexander Circle is south of the Site. The area south of 

the building consists of asphalt and concrete pavement and is used for store deliveries and the 

storage of waste dumpsters. To the west of the Site building is manicured grass. Current 

commercial tenants include a Hardware Store (21 Terrace Lane), salons (623-625 Access 

Drive), a currency exchange (615 Access Drive), Ms. Clean Laundromat (7 Terrace Lane), and 

Subway (3 Terrace Lane). 

Prior to the construction on Spartans’ Square Shopping Center, the Site was utilized as 

agricultural cropland. 

2.2 SOURCES REVIEWED 

A number of data sources were reviewed to evaluate conditions at the Site. These sources 

include Phase I and II environmental site investigations directly related to the Site, and physical 

setting publications. In addition, site investigations for one of the adjacent properties and the 

corresponding reports were also reviewed for information pertinent to the Spartans’ Square 

Shopping Center. Information regarding historical operations and initial data regarding site 

conditions were obtained from previous investigations. 

Environmental Investigations: 

• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Spartans’ Square Shopping Center, SWC 

Illinois Rte 53 (Independence Boulevard) and Phelps Avenue, Romeoville, IL, February 

13, 2008, V3 Companies of Illinois, LTD. 

• Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Spartans Square Shopping Center, SWC 

Illinois Rte 53 (Independence Boulevard) and Phelps Avenue, Romeoville, IL, February 

6, 2008, V3 Companies of Illinois, LTD. 

• Passive Soil-Gas Survey, Dry Cleaner, Romeoville, IL, August 27, 2008, Beacon 

Environmental Services, Inc. 

Adjacent Property Environmental Investigations: 

• Site Investigation Completion Report, Former Clark Store #2105, 645 North 

Independence Boulevard, Romeoville, IL, August 20, 2007, ERS of Illinois, Inc. 



Physical Setting Sources: 

• Berg, R.C., Kempton, J.P., and Keros, C. 1984. Potential for Contamination of Shallow 

Aquifers in Illinois. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, State 

Geological Survey Division: Champaign, Ill. Circular 532. 

• Berg, R.C., and Kempton, J.P. 1988. Stack-Unit Mapping of Geologic Materials in Illinois 

to a depth of 15 Meter. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Illinois State 

Geological Survey: Champaign, Ill. 

• Hansel, AK and Johnson, WH, 1996. Wedron and Mason Groups: Lithostratigraphic 

Reclassification of Deposits of the Wisconsin Episode, Lake Michigan Lobe Area. 

Department of Natural Resources, Illinois State Geological Survey: Champaign, Ill. 

Bulletin 104. 

• Piskin, K. and Bergstrom, R.E. 1975. Glacial Drift in Illinois: Thickness and Character. 

Illinois Department of Registration and Education, State Geological Survey Division: 

Urbana, Ill. Circular 490. 

• Burch, Stephen L., 2002. A comparison of Potentiometric Surfaces for the Cambrian- 

Ordovician Aquifers of Northeastern Illinois, 1995 and 2000. Illinois State Water Survey, 

Division of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Data Case Study 2002-02. 

• Menzies, John. 1996. Past Glacial Environments: Sediments, Forms and Techniques: 

Glacial Environments. Butterworth-Heinemann. 605 pp. 

• Suter M, Bergstrom RE, Smith HF, Emrich GH, Walton WC, and Larson TE. 1959. 

Preliminary Report on Ground-Water Resources of the Chicago Region, Illinois. Illinois 

State Water Survey and Illinois State Geological Survey, Cooperative Ground-water 

Report 1. 

2.3 SITE HISTORY 

The primary source for the historical site history summarized in this section is from V3’s Phase I 

ESA. In addition, reports prepared by other consultants pertaining to adjacent properties were 

reviewed. Copies of the documentation pertaining to the Site are provided in Appendix A. The 

historical reviews included historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, agency records, and 

interviews with current owners/representatives. Refer to Figure 1.3 for current buildings located 

on the Site. The following summarizes the Site history. 

• 1939-1960 -- No buildings are indicated on the Site. The Site appears as agricultural 

cropland. 

• 1961-1971 -- The eastern portion of the Spartans’ Square shopping center building was 

constructed in the early 1960s. Various commercial and retail tenants, including a dry 

cleaner/laundromat have occupied space at the shopping center. A grocery store was 

historically the anchor tenant at the center. 

• 1971-2008 -- An addition was constructed to the western portion of the building in 1971. In 

the mid-1980s, the far eastern portion of the shopping center was renovated. The former 

grocery store space has been unoccupied since 2004. 

No significant data gaps were identified in the review of historical site use. 



2.4 TOPOGRAPHY 

The elevation of the Site is approximately 620-610 feet above mean sea level (msl) based on 

the 1975 Romeoville, IL 7.5 Minute Topographic Map. The Site is relatively flat and slopes to 

the southeast. 

Regionally, the land surface slopes in a general southwest direction towards the Des Plaines 

River and the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, which are located approximately three-quarters 

of a mile southwest from the Site. 

2.5 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 

2.5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 

Regional bedrock geology consists of Pre-Cambrian crystalline rock, which is overlain by a thick 

blanket of Cambrian age dolomite and sandstone followed by limestone/dolomite of Ordovician 

Age. The uppermost (youngest) Ordovician bedrock unit in this region is the Maquoketa Shale, 

which consists primarily of thinly bedded shale formation approximately 135 feet thick which 

uncomformably overlies Ordovician Dolomites (Willman et al, 1975). 

The Maquoketa Shale is overlain by Silurian System Dolomites which consist of the following 

formations from oldest to youngest: Wilhelmi Formation, Elwood Formation, Kankakee 

Formation, Joliet Formation, Sugar Run Formation and the Racine Formation. The Racine 

Dolomite consists of medium-gray, fine-to-medium grained, well bedded, vuggy, pure dolomite 

with prominent reef structures. The Racine Formation dips to the southeast at a rate of roughly 

10 feet per mile and is approximately 300 feet thick. 

Overlying the Racine Formation dolomite bedrock are units of unconsolidated, interbedded 

glacial drift and Holocene fluvial sediment approximately 15-20 feet thick. The glacial drift 

consists of silty and clayey diamictons of the Wedron Formation. Glaciofluvial sands and 

gravels known as the Henry Formation are intertongued with the Wedron Formation. Berg and 

Kempton (1988) indicate that the Henry Formation deposits are underlain by a lithified unit 

approximately 0-25 feet below ground surface (bgs). Bedrock contour maps of the region 

indicate that bedrock is located at approximately 600 feet msl, which is 10-20 feet below the 

surface elevation of the Site. 

Based on a review of the geological map entitled Potential for Contamination of Shallow 

Aquifers in Illinois: Ill. GS Circular 532, 30 p., Berg, R.C., Kempton, J.P., and Cartwright, K. 

1984,, the predominant soil type in the area of the site is comprised of Type A1 soil, which is 

“Permeable bedrock at or within 20 feet of land surface, variable overlying materials”. The 

existence of this type of soil in the vicinity of the Site will generally increase the potential for 

contamination migration. In addition, based on Glacial Drift thickness in Illinois: Thickness and 

Character Ill. GS Circular 490, Berg, R.C., Kempton, J.P., and Cartwright, K. 1975, glacial drift is 

less than 25 feet deep at the Site. 

According to the United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resource Conservation 

Service Will County Soil Survey (USDA and NRCS 1976), the east side of the Site is attributed 

to the Will Silty Clay Loam Soil Series and the West Side of the Site is attributed to the Dunham 

Silty Clay Loam Soil Series. 



The Will Silty Clay Loam is a poorly drained soil with moderate permeability derived on outwash 

plains and stream terraces from loess and loamy glacialfluvial deposits over sand and gravel 

glaciofluvial deposits. Groundwater can be 1-2 feet bgs from January through May. The 

Dunham Silty Clay Loam Soil Series is a poorly drained soil with moderate permeability derived 

on outwash plains and stream terraces from loess silt over sand and gravel glaciofluvial 

deposits. Groundwater can be 1-2 feet bgs from January through May. 

2.5.2 REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY 

Aquifers within this region can be broken down into four categories, which are listed below 

(Burch et al, 2002). 

(i) 

(ii) 

(iii) 

(iv) 

Sand and gravel deposits of the glacial drift, 

Shallow dolomite formations, mainly of Silurian age 

Deep sandstone and dolomite formations of Cambrian-Ordovician age, and 

Deep sandstone aquifer (Mt. Simon) 

The main aquifers in the region are glacial drift aquifers and bedrock aquifers. The following 

bedrock aquifers exist in the region: Racine Dolomite, Galena-Platteville, Saint Peter 

Sandstone of Ordovician Age, and Ironton-Galesville and Elmhurst-Mount Simon of Cambrian 

age. Several public water supply wells for the City of Romeoville are screened in the 

Silurian/Ordovician/Cambrian bedrock (see Section 2.55 and Appendix B). 

The glacial drift aquifers in this region are limited to small glacial outwash/advance sand and 

gravel seams in between till units. These aquifers are generally low yielding, thin and noncontinuous. 

The significant drift aquifer lies within the thick deposits of glacial outwash of the 

Henry formation. This aquifer exists in many of the major river valleys of the region and is 

generally encountered less than 20 feet from the ground surface. 

The uppermost bedrock aquifer system in the region is located in the Racine Dolomite. The 

porosity and permeability of the Racine Formation is the result of fractures and dissolution 

cavities. Yields in fracture zones can be greater than 1000 gallons per minute. 

The main aquifer below the Racine formation is the Galena-Platteville aquifer. The Galena- 

Platteville aquifer is overlain by the Maquoketa shale which acts as an aquitard. Beneath the 

Galena-Platteville aquifer, several other bedrock aquifers exist which include the St. Peter 

Sandstone Aquifer, Ironton-Galesville Aquifer and the Mt. Simon Sandstone Aquifer. 

2.5.3 SITE GEOLOGY 

Site borings were completed by V3 in January 2008 to May 2009. These borings provide 

geologic interpretation to approximately 20 feet bgs. A total of 40 soil borings and monitoring 

wells were installed by V3. The compilation of these boring logs and well construction logs 

provides a descriptive understanding of the upper-most 20 feet of the Site’s geology (see 

Appendix C). Five basic units were observed within the 20 feet: 

• Light brown and gray mottled silty clay fill with bricks, sand and gravel 

• Gray and brown silty clay or clayey silt with organic material, sand and/or gravel (not 

continuous through Site) 



• Brown to gray well graded sand and gravel and /or clayey sand and gravel interbedded 

with silt to bedrock 

• Dark gray silty clay with trace sand and gravel (only in northwest side of Site) to bedrock 

• Dolomite Bedrock 

The light brown and gray mottled silty clay fill with bricks, sand and gravel is located directly 

below concrete and asphalt pavement and is approximately 4.5 feet thick with a maximum depth 

of seven feet bgs. Approximately 6-inches to 1-foot of organic topsoil overlies the fill material in 

locations where landscaping has occurred. 

The well graded sands and gravels are interbedded with silt and represent the Henry Formation. 

This unit consists of the former river channel or postglacial outwash deposits. All of monitoring 

wells installed by V3 are screened within this water-bearing unit. The Henry Formation was 

encountered as shallow as three feet in some locations at the Site. It extends to the terminus of 

the borings or the contact with the Racine Dolomite. Large cobbles in this unit likely caused 

refusal in several locations shallow than 17 feet bgs. 

Gray silty clay diamictons with trace sand and gravel located on the northwest side of the Site 

represent the Wedron Formation and are intertongued with the Henry Formation. Groundwater 

in the Wedron Formation is limited to discontinuous sand and gravel lenses. The Wedron 

Formation extending to the Racine Dolomite was observed at the Site. 

The lowermost unit encountered during soil borings and well installations was dolomite bedrock, 

which is the Silurian Racine Dolomite. The Racine Dolomite was encountered at depths ranging 

from 17-20 feet bgs. The Racine Dolomite is highly weathered and several feet of highly 

weathered rock are commonly encountered at the contact with overlying units. In borings 

advanced at the southeast side of the Site, approximately 6-inches to 1-foot of silty clay lies 

directly on the Racine Dolomite bedrock. 

2.5.4 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY 

The Shallow Silurian dolomite aquifer can be accessed approximately 17 feet below the Site. 

This aquifer is a source of water supply for private and non-community services within the area. 

Groundwater monitoring undertaken on-site is within the upper-most expanses of the main sand 

and gravel unit of the Henry Formation, which is approximately 3-17 bgs of the Site. Based on 

the general geologic history of this area and analysis of boring logs, it is reasonable to conclude 

this saturated zone is a part of a major sand and gravel aquifer beneath the Site. The on-site 

saturated zone flows towards the Des Plaines River. 

V3 surveyed four of the permanent monitoring wells (SM-MW-01 through SM-MW-04) when 

they were installed during the May 2009 investigation. Based on measured water levels, the 

groundwater is flowing to the southeast toward the Des Plaines River and Chicago Ship and 

Sanitary Canal (Figure 2.1). This is consistent with regional groundwater flow illustrated by the 

Romeoville 7.5 Minute Topographic Map. 

Based on the available water level data, it is reasonable to assume that the saturated zone 

occasionally extends into the fill material. Overall, the saturated zone is a function of the 

underlying sand and gravel deposits and its non-continuous layers of fine-grained materials, 

which influence internal semi-perched behavior within the aquifer. 



Groundwater Classification: 

The saturated zone directly beneath the Site is classified as a Class I: Potable Resource 

Groundwater, in accordance with Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle F: Public Water 

Supplies, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board Part 620b: Groundwater Classification. The criteria 

and justifications for the Class I determination are provided below. 

(i) 

(ii) 

(iii) 

(iv) 

Based on literature regarding regional geology and Site observations, it is likely that 

there is at least 15 feet of fractured dolomite (carbonate) of the Racine Formation 

beginning at approximately 17 feet bgs. 

Site investigations indicate evidence of unconsolidated sand and gravel with less 

than 12% fine-grained material exists in units of five feet or more in thickness. 

The Site is not located within any minimum setback of a well, based on information 

obtained during V3’s potable well survey (See Section 2.5.5). 

Results from a slug test performed by V3 indicate a hydraulic conductivity greater 

than 1 X 10 -4 cm/s. 

Hydraulic Conductivity 

A slug test was performed on monitoring well SM-MW-04 by pumping the well dry 

using a Grunfos 2-inch diameter pump and measuring how long it took for the 

groundwater elevation took to return to its previous elevation. The data was then 

entered into Aqtesolve to determine the hydraulic conductivity of the well. The 

hydraulic response from the slug test was determined to be 1.786 X 10 -4 cm/s, which 

is greater than the hydraulic conductivity of 1 X 10 -4 cm/s used to determine Class I 

Groundwater. 

2.5.5 WATER WELL SURVEY 

V3 contacted various local and state entities for water well records within a 2,500-foot radius of 

the Spartans’ Square Shopping Center. Well searches were conducted within Township 37 

North, Range 10 East (Sections 27, 28, 33 & 34). The following sources were contacted and 

provided information to complete this well survey: 

• Illinois State Water Survey Well Database (non-municipal wells) and the Illinois Water 

Inventory Program (IWIP) Database (municipal and commercial wells) 

• Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Records of Community Supply Wells (CWS) 

• Illinois Department of Public Health Records for Non-Community Supply Wells (Non- 

CWS) 

• Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Division of Public Water Supplies (SWAP) 

Database 

• Illinois State Geological Survey – Water Well Database 

• Village of Romeoville – Public Works Water Department 

• Will County Health Department 

Test holes and environmental monitoring wells are not included in this survey and assessment. 



Figure 2.2 depicts the location of the identified wells within the 2,500-foot radius based on the 

reviewed data. Appendix B provides details related to these wells including owners, status, 

depths, and all water well survey correspondence information. 

Two map ID locations were identified within the 2,500-foot radius of the Site. The locations 

represent two public water supply wells operated by the Village of Romeoville. Map ID 1 has a 

200-foot minimum setback zone. It reaches a depth of 1,458 feet and is located within the 

Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer. Map ID 2 has a 400-foot minimum setback zone. It reaches a 

depth of 165 feet and is located within the Devonian-Silurian Aquifer. According to Mr. Chris 

Drey, Village of Romeoville Public Works Water Department Superintendent, both public wells 

are currently active and the Village of Romeoville’s municipal water is supplied by a total of 12 

community wells. Furthermore, water in the area of the Site generally flows to the east and the 

public wells are located to the west of the Site. ISWS records indicated a third public water 

supply well (Well #6) to be located in the area of Map ID 1 and 2. Mr. Drey informed V3 that 

well was permitted, but never constructed. He did not know the exact proposed location for the 

well. 

Appendix B shows ownership of these wells and other important attributes. Of these wells, 

none are located on the Site and the Site is not located within the minimum setback for public 

water supply wells. All of the wells are located up-gradient from the Site. 

An ordinance was passed by the Village of Romeoville in 2009 establishing the definition of 

potable water and regulating the potable water supply system. The ordinance prohibits 

installation of new potable supply wells and prohibits any potable water supply system within a 

specific radius of 927 feet from One Alexander Circle, which is located to the adjoining south of 

the Site and is a Shell Gas Station. The ordinance was approved for use by the IEPA as an 

area of groundwater use restriction and is provided in Appendix B. The ordinance is based on 

the modeled extent of contaminants identified at the southern adjoining site. Groundwater 

concentrations within the ordinance area may exceed Class I groundwater objectives. The 

entire Remediation Site is included in this radius for groundwater use restriction. However, 

groundwater flow from the adjoining property is believed to be cross-gradient/down-gradient 

from the Site. Analysis of the closest soil and groundwater samples to the Site do not indicate 

evidence of gasoline impacts. 

Based on the results of the well survey, the Site is not located within the setback of any potable 

water supply well. Please refer to Figure 2.2 and Appendix B for further detail and all water 

well survey correspondence information. 

2.6 CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USE 

The Site is currently occupied by Spartans’ Square Shopping Center, a 57,187 square foot, one 

story strip mall built from 1961-1971. Spartans’ Square Shopping Center is currently occupied 

by a restaurant (Subway), a self serve Laundromat (Laundromat), several salons, a currency 

exchange and a True Value hardware store. Several stores that are currently vacant have been 

occupied by restaurants and a grocery store in the past. There is an asphalt parking lot to the 

north, east and south of Spartans’ Square Shopping Center and a grassy area to the west. 

The intended reuse of the Site is retail development. The planned redevelopment is part of the 

Romeoville Downtown Master Plan. Downtown Romeoville includes the area roughly bounded 



y Dalhart Avenue to the west, Normantown Road to the north, Illinois Route 53 to the east and 

Alexander Circle to the south. 

2.7 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS 

The subsequent evaluations included within this CSI/ROR rely in part upon documentation of 

investigations conducted by others. The documentation from prior historic site investigations— 

primarily ERS—was reviewed for use in characterizing identified recognized environmental 

conditions (RECs), but were not performed under the direction of V3 staff or the Licensed 

Professional Engineer (LPE). The following sections summarize the results from multiple 

investigations performed at the Site. The available information was reviewed by V3 and 

summarized to provide historical context and support characterization of RECs at the Site. 

Available analytical data collected during previous investigations are summarized and provided 

in Tables 1.1. Sample locations are shown on Figure 3.2. 

Copies of all available documentation related to the investigations summarized below are 

located in Appendix A. 

2.7.1 SITE INVESTIGATION COMPLETION REPORT, FORMER CLARK STORE 

(EAST ADJACENT PROPERTY) SITE INVESTIGATION COMPLETION REPORT, 

AUGUST 2007 

On August 20, 2007 ERS of Illinois, Inc. submitted a Site Investigation Completion Report 

(SICR) to the IEPA Leaking Underground Storage Program (LUST) for a former Clark Station 

(now an active Phillips 66 service station) located at 645 North Independence Boulevard (IL 

Route 53). The SCIR addressed diesel and gasoline impacts (Incident # 20041221) discovered 

during a Site Investigation of the east adjacent property. 

ERS advanced eight soils borings at the former Clark gas station and three soil borings off-site 

to delineate and address impacts to soil and groundwater associated with a leaking 

underground storage tank. Two of the borings (MW-9 and MW-10) were advanced and 

converted into permanent monitoring wells on the east side of the Spartans’ Square Shopping 

Center. Only well MW-10 is located in the Spartans’ Square Remediation Site. Analytical 

results indicated that the concentrations of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PNAs) in 

groundwater samples collected from both locations exceeded ROs for Class I groundwater. 

See Appendix A.1 for investigation documentation. 

The IEPA LUST on-line database currently identifies the property as Sandhu Petroleum, Inc. 

and the LUST incident is still open. A Site Investigation Stage 3 Plan and Budget was approved 

by IEPA with modifications in March 2009. 

2.7.2 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, FEBRUARY 2008 

V3 prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on the Site in February 2008 for the 

Village of Romeoville. The report meets the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) 

Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment Process (Standard E1527-05) and the U.S. EPA November 1, 2005 Standards and 



Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312). The assessment included 

the Site, as well as, the property north (parking lot) and west (manicured grass) of the Site 

bounded by Phelps Avenue and Townhall Drive. 

Based upon the historical research and previous investigations, V3 identified the following 

RECs: 

• Three below-ground hydraulic lifts are located south of the building behind the former 

grocery store and current hardware store. 

• Historical on-site dry cleaning operations were reportedly performed at the space 

currently occupied by Mrs. Clean Laundromat. 

• Groundwater impacts from an open LUST incident that occurred at the east adjacent 

Philips 66 Gas Station (Former Clark Station) has apparently impacted the groundwater 

at the Site. 

• Based on regulatory status, groundwater flow direction and close proximity, the open 

LUST incident at the former Clark Gas Station (northeast corner of Phelps Avenue and 

Route 53) has the potential to impact the subject site. 

For the purposes of this report, the former Clark Gas Station at the northeast corner of Phelps 

Avenue and Route 53, is no longer considered a REC to the Site, based on the distance from 

the Remediation Site and the direction of groundwater flow to the southeast. 


2.7.3 V3 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, FEBRUARY 2008 

V3 advanced nine soil borings to a maximum depth of 18.5 feet bgs and two temporary wells on 

January 24, 2008. The purpose of the Phase II ESA was to investigate potential impacts from 

the historical dry cleaners. The Phase II ESA identified tetrachloroethene or perchloroethene 

(PCE) in soil samples collected from the former dry cleaner (currently Mrs. Clean Laundromat) 

that exceeded Tier 1 remediation objectives. Concentrations of PCE in groundwater were also 

identified in both groundwater samples above Class I groundwater remediation objectives. The 

results of the Phase II ESA are included in this CSI/ROR. 


2.7.4 PASSIVE SOIL GAS SURVEY, AUGUST 2008 

A Passive Soil Gas Survey was completed at the Site by V3 and Beacon Environmental 

Services on August 27, 2008. A V3 Geologist installed and collected soil gas from 26 locations 

in the former Chinese Buffet, Mrs. Clean Laundromat, the vacant space east of the Laundromat 

(former Mexican Restaurant) and in the parking lot. The soil gas samples were collected to 

identify any source locations, delineate possible VOC impacts from areas identified in the Phase 

II ESA and identify drilling locations for additional investigations. Samples were also collected 

in, and special attention was paid to areas (sewers, drain pipe, toilets) where dry cleaning 

solvents may have been disposed of in the past. 



The soil gas samples were submitted to Beacon Environmental Services for chemical analysis. 

Chemical analysis indicated that the center of the tetrachloroethene plume was likely located in 

the vicinity of the mechanical room of the Mrs. Clean Laundromat. In addition, concentrations of 

total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations (C5-C9, indicating BTEX compounds) were 

detected in the south end of the former Mexican restaurant. The results from the Soil Gas 

Survey were used qualitatively by V3 to identify drilling locations for the Comprehensive Site 

Investigation. 


2.7.5 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS AND DATA RELIANCE 

The documentation from prior historic site investigations was reviewed for use in identifying and 

characterizing RECs and for identifying the constituents of concern (COCs). The 

documentation from prior historic site investigations—primarily ERS—was reviewed for use in 

characterizing identified RECs, but were not performed under the direction of V3 staff or the 

Licensed Professional Engineer (LPE). 

The subsequent evaluations included within this CSI/ROR rely in part upon documentation of 

investigations conducted by others. The following sections summarize the results from multiple 

investigations performed at the Site. The available information was reviewed by V3 and 

summarized to provide historical context and support characterization of RECs at the Site. 



3.0 SITE-SPECIFIC SAMPLING PLAN 

The investigations discussed as part of the site-specific sampling plan refer only to the site 

investigation events performed by V3 Companies during 2008-2009. As discussed previously, 

the documentation from prior historic site investigations was reviewed to determine possible 

COCs. The historic site investigations were not performed under the direction of V3 staff, and 

thus are not discussed as part of this site-specific sampling plan. The discussions below 

provide the basic framework for implementation of successive work plans, while overall site 

Investigation activities are discussed in greater detail in Section 4.0. 

3.1 SITE RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 

The Phase I ESA RECs have been condensed to RECs that impact the Site. The far northeast 

Former Clark Station is no longer considered a REC based on the distance from the 

Remediation Site and the direction of groundwater flow to the southeast. The following were 

identified as potential RECs requiring further Site investigation and evaluation: 

REC 1 – Former Dry Cleaning Operations: This REC addresses the possible impacts 

to the Site from a former dry cleaner that operated in the space where Mrs. Clean 

Laundromat is currently located. Mrs. Clean Laundromat is strictly a laundromat and dry 

cleaning operations are not currently conducted on-site. 

REC 2 – Hydraulic Lifts: This REC addresses possible impacts from three out-of-use 

hydraulic lifts located on the south side of the former grocery store and current hardware 

store. 

REC 3 – East Adjacent Gas Station: This REC addresses possible soil and 

groundwater impacts from the off-site east adjacent Phillips 66 Gas Station (Former 

Clark Station and LUST site) to the northeast corner of the Site. 

Refer to Figure 3.1 for a rough graphical depiction of Site RECs 1 through 3 and Figure 3.2 for 

boring locations. Field investigations of these areas have been performed to confirm 

environmental conditions associated with these features. Documentation of field actions and a 

summary of the field investigation findings begin in Section 4.0. 

3.2 SAMPLING OBJECTIVES 

The Remediation Applicant (RA) is pursuing a comprehensive NFR letter pursuant to the 

requirements of the SRP. Based on an evaluation of available Site data, the Site-Specific 

Sampling Plan was developed to obtain the data necessary to accomplish the following 

objectives: 

• Evaluate environmental conditions at each of the identified Site RECs, 

• Obtain analytical data throughout the Site for the COCs, 

• Enable a comparison of Site data to applicable TACO Tier 1 ROs, 

• Evaluate potential pathway exclusions, including potential contaminant source and free 

product, and 

• Enable the development of Tier 2 ROs, as applicable. 



3.3 INVESTIGATION MONITORING AND EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 

A photoionization detector (PID) was used to monitor worker air quality at all sampling locations 

and screen soils for possible contaminants using the headspace technique. The PID was 

equipped with an 11.7 electron volt lamp and calibrated daily to a 100 parts per million (ppm) 

isobutylene to air standard. The headspace technique involves placing a representative portion 

of each sample in a Ziploc® quart-sized bag, agitating the sample, and sealing the bag. After 

sealing the bag, the sample is allowed to warm for ten minutes. The probe of the PID is then 

inserted through the bag and the maximum reading over a 15-second period is recorded in the 

field book. 

All equipment that directly or indirectly came into contact with sample media was 

decontaminated prior to use and between each sample location. This included the macro core 

sampler, sampling shovels, mixing bowls, and mixing spoons. Decontamination of sampling 

equipment was performed using a potable water and Liquinox ® solution wash, followed by a 

potable water rinse, and a distilled water rinse. 

3.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATION DERIVED MATERIALS 

Soil cuttings were disposed at the Site, at the sampling location where generated; any surplus 

or visually impacted soils were drummed in DOT approved 55-gallon steel drums. Any purge 

water or decontamination water was drummed in DOT approved 55-gallon steel drums for 

storage, pending laboratory analysis results. Used personal protective equipment was bagged 

and placed in the daily garbage, for municipal disposal, unless suspect of gross contamination. 

3.5 SOIL SAMPLING 

The following describes the different sampling methods undertaken throughout the Site RECs. 

Each method used was decided upon following consideration of data requirements and 

necessary field work to be completed for each respective REC. 

Borings were advanced by several drilling companies, including Paramount Environmental, 

IEPA Office of Site Evaluation (OSE) and Johnson Probing under the supervision of V3’s site 

engineer/geologist, using hollow-stem auger and Geoprobe ® direct push soil sampling methods. 

Prior to drilling, JULIE performed on-site location of utilities and a private utility locator confirmed 

utilities in some locations. Each boring was sampled continuously using a decontaminated 1.5 

to 2-inch-diameter, 24 to 60-inch-long macro-core sampler or two foot split spoon sampler. 

Each soil sample was collected for headspace screening to determine the presence of volatile 

organic vapors, physical description, and possible laboratory chemical analysis. Results of the 

headspace screening and visual descriptions were recorded in the field notebook. Based upon 

the results of the headspace screening and visual observation, soil samples from each boring 

were retained for laboratory analysis relative to the RECs chemicals of concern. 

New disposable sampling gloves were donned for each sample collected, and during handling 

of sampling equipment. For each recovered soil sample, samples for possible volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) were collected directly from the recovered sample, in accordance with 

USEPA SW-846 Method 5035/8260. All samples collected for VOCs were obtained directly 

from the recovered sampler at the specified sample interval using a disposable plastic 5-gram 



syringe barrel. The barrel was driven into the soil surface to remove the soil without exposure to 

air. The 5-gram soil sample was then extruded into one 40-ml vial preserved with methanol. 

This process was repeated until two 40-ml vials preserved with sodium bisulfate were also filled 

with 5-grams of soil each. The samples were immediately capped, labeled, and placed on ice. 

For all additional analysis, the remaining portion of the recovered sample from the specified 

sample interval was placed into appropriate laboratory specified jars, labeled with the sample 

name, sample location, sample depth (if appropriate), date, time, preservative (if appropriate), 

and name of sampler. All samples were then immediately placed in a cooler filled with ice. 

A V3 engineer/geologist logged the subsurface conditions encountered using the Unified Soil 

Classification System (USCS) (ASTM Method D2488). Additional information that was 

documented includes: 

• Boring identification 

• Location in relation to an easily identifiable landmark 

• Name of drilling contractor 

• Drilling method 

• Depth at which saturated conditions are first encountered 

• Headspace screening results 

• Sample identification and depths 

• Soil weathering 

• Zones of caving or heaving 

• Refusal. 

Soil boring logs are provided in Appendix C. Site photos are presented in Appendix D. 

3.6 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND DEVELOPMENT 

A total of five permanent and eleven temporary monitoring wells were installed from January 

2008 to May 2009 as discussed in Section 3.0 and in later sections of this report (see Figure 

3.2). Paramount Environmental, IEPA OSE and Johnson Probing performed the drilling 

activities, under subcontract to V3. A hand cart Geoprobe or 6600 DT drill rig was used to install 

the permanent groundwater monitoring wells based on site-specific data. Permanent wells were 

utilized by V3 for groundwater sampling locations on the Site for reproducible and accurate 

groundwater constituent analysis and hydrogeologic analysis. 

The permanent groundwater monitoring wells were installed utilizing macrocore or 6-inch 

hollow-stem augers (HSA). Following the soil logging, moisture observation, and PID screening, 

permanent monitoring well construction was completed by installing a ¾-inch, 1-inch or 2-inch 

inside diameter (i.d.) schedule 40 flush-thread polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 0.01-inch horizontally 

factory slotted screen at each well location. Schedule 40 PVC riser was attached to the 

screened PVC to the approximate ground surface. Permanent monitoring wells were completed 

by placing filter pack sand approximately 1-2 feet above the top of screen. Bentonite pellets 

were placed within the annular space from the top of the filter pack sand to approximately 1 foot 

bgs and a flush-mount well cover was installed to complete the permanent well. 

Next, well development included purging the water wells using either a polyethylene dedicated 

disposable bailer or by placing disposable polyethylene tubing into the screened interval and 

attaching the upper tubing end to a peristaltic pump. The water was purged a minimum of five 



casing volumes and allowed to recharge, if necessary, until little or no sediment entered the 

monitoring well. 

The temporary monitoring wells were constructed of one-inch diameter five-foot long, 0.01-inch 

slot, Schedule 40 PVC screens. The temporary monitoring wells were removed immediately 

after groundwater sampling and backfilled with cuttings and bentonite chips. 

Development consisted of pumping three to five well volumes of water with a submersible purge 

pump. Temperature, pH, specific conductance, and turbidity were measured after each well 

volume was removed. Development continued until these parameters stabilized within the 

following ranges: ±1 unit for pH, and ±10% for specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity. 

3.7 GROUNDWATER / MONITORING WELL SAMPLING 

Before commencing measurement activities, each permanent and temporary monitoring well 

was checked for aboveground damage and vegetation around the well cleared, as necessary 

for access. Any water that was present inside the protective casing or in the vaults around the 

well casing was removed prior to opening the casing cap. 

Groundwater levels were measured in all wells intended for sampling in as short a period of time 

as practicable. All measurements were taken with a decontaminated electronic water level 

indicator. The depth to water was measured from a marked datum on the rim of the riser pipe to 

an accuracy of ±0.01 feet. The static water level measurements were recorded in the field book. 

The sampling equipment and procedures for monitoring well sampling are described as follows. 

The static water level was measured with a decontaminated electronic water level meter. The 

volume of standing water in the well was calculated based on the static water level and well 

depth. Prior to sampling activities, the monitoring well was purged a minimum of three well 

casing volumes using a polyethylene bailer or peristaltic pump to ensure the subsequent sample 

is from within the formation water. Groundwater samples were obtained with either a disposal 

bailer or by micro-purging the monitoring well at a rate of 0.1 gallon per minute (gpm) with a 

peristaltic pump. 

Field measurements of water quality indicator parameters, including pH and temperature were 

made during purging to confirm that groundwater indicator parameters had stabilized within 10 

percent of previous readings. Samples were transferred directly from the bailer or tubing to the 

appropriate laboratory provided sample bottles. Sample bottles were filled slowly, avoiding 

unnecessary agitation. 

Collected VOC sample bottles were collected to ensure that air bubbles or headspace is 

minimal by a securely tightened cap. Further, the sample bottle was inverted and tapped firmly 

to check for air bubbles. If an air bubble was observed, the bottle was opened and a small 

amount of groundwater sample was added to the bottle to ensure a meniscus is observed prior 

to re-capping. This method ensures that the VOC sample is

maximum of two hours. The containerized sample were carefully poured and transferred from 

the original jar into clean laboratory grade plastic jars containing appropriate preservatives. 

Care was taken to not introduce settled sediment when transferring collected samples. 

Bailers, ropes, plastic tubing, and all other field measurement and sampling equipment were 

decontaminated prior to inserting them into each well, as described in Section 3.3. 

Groundwater grab samples were collected from the wells by either using a dedicated, bottomfilling 

disposable polyethylene bailer or polyethylene tubing and a peristaltic pump. For both 

sampling methods, special care was taken to avoid physically altering or chemically 

contaminating the samples. 

Groundwater samples were collected in appropriate laboratory supplied containers, preservative 

added depending on the analysis, then placed on ice to cool to 4°C, packed and hand delivered 

or picked up by State of Illinois Laboratory, Springfield, Illinois or First Environmental 

Laboratories (First) in Naperville, Illinois for analysis. All containers were furnished by the 

analytical laboratory and pre-cleaned according to US EPA protocols. Field quality 

assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples (trip blanks and field duplicates) were collected at 

the frequency specified in V3’s Sampling and Analysis Plan or as otherwise specified. Required 

chain-of-custody procedures were maintained from the time of sample collection until delivery to 

the analytical laboratory. 

3.8 LABORATORY METHODOLOGIES 

Laboratory services were performed by State of Illinois Laboratory, Springfield, Illinois and First 

Environmental of Naperville, Illinois (First). All of the laboratories are accredited by the Illinois 

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (IL ELAP), a copy of the accreditation status 

and certification that all analyses were performed in accordance with the requirements of 35 Ill. 

Adm. Code 186 is provided in Appendix E.1. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for 

one or more of the following: VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, PCBs, pH, total analyte list (TAL) 

metals, RCRA metals, fractional organic carbon (FOC) and total cyanide. Analytical methods 

used are listed below: 

Parameter 

Method Number 

Total Solids 

2540B 

VOCs, BTEX 

5035A/8260B 

SVOCs/PNAs 

8270C 

Pesticides/PCBs 8081A/8082 

pH 

4500H+B/9045C 

Total Metals 

6010B 

Total Mercury 

7470A 

FOC 

D2974-87C 

Standard chain-of-custody procedures were followed to ensure adequate documentation 

accompanied all samples submitted to the laboratory. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the sample 

cooler was accepted by the Laboratory Sample Custodian who signed and dated the chain-ofcustody 

record. Complete analytical data reports and copies of the chain-of-custody forms are 

provided in Appendix E.2. 



Summary results of analyses are presented in Table 1.1. Data comparison to appropriate 

remediation objectives are detailed in Tables 2.1 to 2.5 and Tables 3.1 to 3.2. 



4.0 DOCUMENTATION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES 

Field activities for V3 site investigations are discussed in the following report sections. Although 

V3 does not warrant the interpretations, evaluations or discussions provided in previous reports 

performed by others, the data from these investigations was used to guide our Site 

investigations. Additionally, the results of investigations conducted by others were used to help 

characterize identified RECs. Documentation for reports prepared by others is provided in 

Appendix A. 

V3 conducted subsurface investigations at the Site from January 2008 to May 2009. The 

investigative activities consisted of the collection of soil samples from 40 locations on four 

separate occasions using Geoprobe® soil sampling methods, and the collection of groundwater 

samples from six permanent and eleven temporary monitoring wells following ASTM methods. 

Details related to these sampling efforts are provided in the following sections, and a summary 

of samples and sampling analysis is provided on Tables 1.1. 

The locations of soil borings and monitoring wells are shown on Figure 3.1. Photographs of 

sampling locations and activities are provided in Appendix D. Appendix F details V3’s 

standard operating procedures (SOPs). 

4.1 SOIL SAMPLING 

Direct push soil sampling provides data on the presence, nature and extent of soil 

contamination, and information on subsurface geology. A total of 38 soil samples were 

collected for chemical analysis from 40 boring locations (Figure 3.2). As stated in Section 3.5, 

continuous soil samples were collected from the borings using a hand auger or 1.5-inchdiameter, 

48 or 60-inch-long macro core sampler equipped with a plastic sample retainer from 

which geologic logs were prepared (Appendix C). Soil samples were screened for VOCs using 

the field headspace technique, as described in Section 3.5. 

Soil samples were collected from the identified REC areas, as indicated on Figure 3.1, and 

discussed below. One soil sample (SM-GP-14) was collected outside the Remediation Site to 

address the distant northeast gas station. The northeast gas station is no longer considered a 

REC due to the distance from the Remediation Site boundary, groundwater flow direction to the 

southeast and analytical results in SM-GP-14. Analytical results from this boring were not used 

as part of the Site characterization. 

A summary of sample depths and analyses are listed in Table 1.1. 

4.2 GROUNDWATER / MONITORING WELL SAMPLING 

Six permanent monitoring wells (MW-10, SM-GP-110, SM-MW-01, SM-MW-02, SM-MW-03 and 

SM-MW-04) and eleven temporary groundwater monitoring wells (SM-GP-07, SM-GP-08, SM- 

GP-13, SM-GP-15 through SM-GP-18, SM-GP-105, SM-GP-106, SM-GP-108 and SM-GP-117) 

were sampled on Site by V3, to assess the potential extent of impacted groundwater and to 

obtain representative water levels. The samples were collected with a bailer or by a peristaltic 

pump as discussed in Section 3.7. Well MW-09, a permanent monitoring well installed by ERS 

to address impacts from the east adjacent gas station, is not located within the Remediation Site 

boundaries and was not sampled by V3. See Figure 3.2 for well locations. 



4.3 REC 1 – FORMER DRY CLEANING OPERATIONS 

The following sampling program was performed within REC 1: 

A total of thirty-five borings (SM-GP-01 through SM-GP-09, SM-GP-13, SM-GP-15 through SM- 

GP-18, SM-GP-102 through SM-GP-118, SM-MW-01 through SM-MW-04) were advanced by 

V3 at the Site (Figure 3.2) from January 2008 to May 2009 to characterize potential subsurface 

impacts associated with the former dry cleaning operations. These borings were advanced to a 

maximum depth of 20 feet bgs. Refusal from large cobbles or bedrock was encountered at 

most locations ranging in depth from 3 to 18.5 feet in the immediate vicinity of the former 

operations. All of the borings inside the building hit refusal between 6 and 12 feet. The 

locations of borings were adjusted based on tenant activities, interior washers, dryers and other 

structures. Based on the location of historical operations on the south end of the building and 

the passive soil gas survey (Section 2.7.4), the borings were advanced in locations that 

corresponded with areas of probable impacts. Borings SM-GP-114 and SM-GP-115 were 

located in the area of identified soil gas TPH C5-C9 (BTEX). Petroleum odors, staining and/or 

elevated PID readings (>5 ppm) were observed in four borings (SM-GP-03, SM-GP-113, SM- 

GP-117 and SM-MW-02). 

Soil samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: VOCs, BTEX/MTBE, SVOCs, 

PNAs, pesticides/PCBs, TAL metals, FOC and pH constituents. TPH was not analyzed 

because oily or saturated soils were not observed. 

Groundwater samples were collected from eleven temporary monitoring wells (SM-GP-07, SM- 

GP-08, SM-GP-13, SM-GP-15 through 18, SM-GP-105, SM-GP-106, SM-GP-108 and SM-GP- 

117) and five permanent monitoring wells (SM-GP-110 and SM-MW-01 through SM-MW-04) to 

characterize Site groundwater conditions. Prior to groundwater sampling, one round of static 

water level measurements was taken from the monitoring wells prior to commencing any 

purging and sampling activities. The wells were purged and sampled using the micro-purge 

low-flow method. Upon stabilization of field parameters, the following samples were collected: 

VOCs, SVOCs, PNAs, TAL metals, PCBs, and pesticides. No evidence of odors or sheen was 

noted in the groundwater samples. 

The sampling locations for this REC are provided in Figure 3.2. 

4.4 REC 2 – HYDRAULIC LIFTS 

The following sampling program was performed to characterize REC 2: 

A total of four borings (SM-GP-10 through SM-GP-12 and SM-GP-101) were advanced by V3 at 

the Site in April 2008 and November 2008 to characterize potential subsurface impacts (Figure 

3.2) associated with three hydraulic lifts on the south side of the building. These borings were 

advanced to a maximum depth of 20 feet bgs. The borings were advanced in locations upgradient 

and immediately down-gradient from the hydraulic lifts. No field indications of soil 

contamination were observed in any of the borings advanced. 



Soil samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: VOCs, SVOCs, PNAs and TAL 

metals constituents. Based on the nature of the constituents associated with hydraulic lifts and 

the lack of field indications of contamination, no groundwater samples were collected. 


4.5 REC 3 – EAST ADJACENT GAS STATION 

The following sampling program was performed to characterize REC 3: 

Soil boring (SM-GP-16 and SM-GP-18) were advanced by V3 to characterize potential 

subsurface impacts (Figure 3.2) associated with the east adjacent gas station. Refusal was 

encountered at 14 and 17 feet bgs, respectively. The boring was advanced on the northeast 

side of the Site, west of well MW-10 advanced by ERS as part of the Site investigation for the 

east adjacent gas station (former Clark Station). No field indications of contamination were 

observed in boring SM-GP-16. Soil samples were not collected from the boring. 

Groundwater samples were collected from temporary monitoring wells (SM-GP-16 and SM-GP- 

18) to characterize groundwater conditions. In addition, groundwater from a permanent 

monitoring well, MW-10, installed by ERS, was also sampled. Prior to groundwater sampling, 

one round of static water level measurements was taken from the monitoring wells prior to 

commencing any purging and sampling activities. The wells were purged and sampled using 

the micro-purge low-flow method. Upon stabilization of field parameters, the samples were 

collected for VOCs. PNAs were also sampled at MW-10 to update the historical sample. No 

evidence of odors or sheen was noted in the groundwater samples. 




5.0 ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT 

The Site Investigation targeted the investigation of the identified RECs: 

• REC 1 – Former Dry Cleaning Operations (areas of concern include former cleaning 

areas, mechanical areas and possible areas of chemical storage), 

• REC 2 – Hydraulic Lifts (areas of concern include the locations of three hydraulic lifts 

located on the south side of the building), and 

• REC 3 – East Adjacent Gas Station (areas of concern include the northeastern portion 

of the Site where PNAs have been previously identified in soil and groundwater). 

The following sections summarize conditions associated with Site RECs and the general 

findings of the Site Investigation. 

5.1 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN (COCS) 

The primary COCs identified through laboratory analysis, the exposure pathways of concern 

(see Table 1.1 for summary), and the apparent source of COCs are discussed briefly below. A 

detailed TACO Tier 1 analysis is provided in Section 6.3. 

• Metals 

‣ Four metals (aluminum, iron, lead and manganese) have been identified in 

groundwater in excess of Tier 1 RO at two wells. However, it is not apparent that the 

encountered concentrations represent a notable groundwater concern, and may be 


‣ The exposure pathway of concern for metals is only the direct groundwater ingestion 

route. 

• VOCs 

‣ VOCs were identified in excess of Tier 1 ROs in multiple soil samples and monitoring 

wells. Identified PCE concentrations and its daughter products are due to former dry 

cleaning operations. Chloroform is also identified as a historical dry cleaning solvent. 

However, the presence of chloroform, bromodichloromethane, and bromoform could 

be the result of disinfection byproducts of drinking water or laboratory standard 

reagents for analysis, unrelated to the Site. BTEX was not identified in the laboratory 

analysis above Tier 1 ROs; only one low detection of toluene was noted. 

‣ The exposure pathway of concern is soil ingestion, inhalation, soil component of the 

groundwater ingestion route and direct groundwater ingestion. 

Pesticides and PCBs were eliminated as Site COCs based on a review of historic environmental 

assessments, Site operations and available investigation data, which indicate no evidence of 

these constituents above Tier 1 ROs. Pesticides were also eliminated from consideration based 

on historical data that did not indicate evidence of their release or illegal disposal at the Site. 

PNAs were eliminated in soil because there were no detections above Tier 1 ROs. PNAs in 

groundwater from historic well (MW-10) were identified in 2006, but V3 re-sampled the well in 



2010 and PNAs did not exceed Tier 1 groundwater ROs. Refer to discussions and data found 

in Sections 2.7.4, Tables 2.1 to 2.4 (soils) and Tables 3.1 to 3.2 (groundwater). 

5.2 DISTRIBUTION / NATURE OF CONTAMINATION 

Nature and Extent of Soil Contamination 

As previously discussed, soils at the Site are impacted with VOCs constituents, most notably 

trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene, associated with former dry cleaning operations. The 

extent of soil impacts are illustrated in Figure 3.3 and are described as follows: 

• The extent of VOC contamination in excess of Tier 1 ROs is approximately 85 feet by 

120 feet. Depths of impacts range from immediately below the concrete pavement to 11 

feet bgs, and the majority of impacts were identified between 7.5-11 feet bgs. A third to 

one half of the VOC impacted soils are located below the current Spartans’ Square 

Shopping Center building. 

• Tetrachloroethene exceeds soil saturation limits at SM-GP-108 from 10-11 feet bgs. 

The exceedance is confined to a maximum 15 foot radius, based upon laboratory 

analysis of adjoining samples that do not exceed soil saturation limits. 

Nature and Extent of Groundwater Contamination 

Groundwater at the Site is impacted with VOC constituents, mainly tetrachloroethene, 

concentrations and its daughter products are associated with former dry cleaning operations. In 

addition, concentrations of four metals (aluminum, iron, lead and manganese) exceeded Class I 

groundwater remediation objectives in two locations near the southeastern boundary. The 

lateral extent of groundwater impacts are illustrated in Figure 3.4 and are described as follows: 

• Concentrations of VOCs (mainly tetrachloroethene) were detected above Class I 

groundwater ROs in four temporary monitoring wells and three permanent monitoring 

wells installed at the southeastern end of the Site and centered around the former dry 

cleaning operations. Bromodichloromethane, chloroform, and bromoform were detected 

above Class I ROs in two wells along the southeastern boundary. Based on the 

proximity of the wells to the Site boundary and the direction of groundwater flow, it is 

possible that VOCs impacts in groundwater extend off-site. Following future remedial 

actions to remove saturated soils, Tier 2 modeling will be used to address the potential 

extent of the remaining groundwater impacts. However, based on the concentrations 

and Site conditions, it is anticipated that any off-site impacts will not exceed the existing 

groundwater ordinance area. 

• Concentrations of four metals (manganese and/or aluminum, iron, lead) were detected 

above Class I groundwater ROs in the monitoring wells (SM-MW-01 and SM-MW-04) 

installed at the southeastern end of the Site. As previously stated, it is not apparent that 

the encountered concentrations represent a notable groundwater concern, and may be 


Refer to Section 6.3 for the full Tier 1 analysis of laboratory results. 



5.3 SITE RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (REDEFINED) 

Based upon the findings of the field observations and laboratory sample analysis, V3 has not 

identified impacts associated with REC 2 and REC 3. As a result, V3 has redefined the three 

previously defined Site RECs as two RECs: 



Site. 



The designation (and redefinition) of RECs was based on the following considerations: 

• Physical distribution of the Contaminants of Concern (COCs) in soil and groundwater 

media; 

• Additional site characterization data requirements; 

• Characterization of any “source material/free product” areas; 

• Complete exposure routes and pathways; 

• Planned Future Use of Site Areas; 

• Pathway exclusion options; 

• Potential use of engineered barriers; and, 

• Potential Remedial Actions. 



6.0 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES EVALUATION 

The following sections establish the baseline conditions at the Site that were determined 

through the Comprehensive Site Investigation (CSI). The later discussions establish site ROs, 

and the areas requiring active remediation to achieve ROs and/or provide for exposure pathway 

exclusion where ROs are exceeded. 

6.1 BASELINE TACO EVALUATION (PRE-REMEDIATION) 

The identification of potential receptors and exposure pathways is an important component of 

the investigation/remedial strategy for the Site because it allows for an evaluation and 

determination of site-specific risk and ROs. Where no potential receptor is exposed to 

contaminants of concern (COC) at a concentration exceeding TACO ROs, remedial actions are 

not required. 

The initial step used to establish Site ROs was the development of a “baseline” TACO 

evaluation. The objectives of this evaluation were limited to determining the following: 

• If known releases to the environment have resulted in residual concentrations of COCs 

greater than TACO Subpart C criteria; and 

• If such residual concentrations represent unacceptable risk under Tier 1 or 2. 

The first phase of a TACO evaluation is to determine if complete exposure routes exist pursuant 

to Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 742.300 (Subpart C: Exposure Route 

Evaluation). Where a complete exposure pathway (source – transport – availability for 

exposure – receptor) does not exist, development of ROs for that exposure route is not 

required. An exposure route evaluation was accomplished on a constituent specific basis for 

each REC. Before a potential exposure route can be eliminated from further consideration, the 

following conditions must be satisfied: 

1. The horizontal and vertical extent and constituent concentrations must be determined; 

2. The sum total of organic constituent concentrations cannot exceed the soil attenuation 

capacity as measured by the natural organic carbon fraction (f oc ) of the soil; 

3. Non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) or free product must be removed to the maximum 

extent practicable; 

4. The concentration of any organic constituent cannot exceed the soil saturation limit; 

5. The soil cannot be classified as a characteristic RCRA hazardous waste for reactivity, 

corrosivity, or toxicity (RCRA metals only). 

6. The concentration of any PCBs in soil shall not exceed 50 parts per million (ppm). 

Evaluation of Site data indicates that conditions in the RECs achieve the TACO Subpart C 

criteria for demonstrating that source material is not present, with one exception. The evaluation 

of Site data indicates the following: 

• Soil attenuation capacity, as measured by the conservative TACO default value of 0.2% 

(2,000 mg/kg), has not been exceeded when compared to the sum of organics in each 

boring (see Tables 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4). 

• Soil does not exhibit pH values less than or equal to 2.0 or greater than or equal to 12.5 

(see Table 2.3). 



• There is no evidence of hazardous metals at the Site (investigation did not identify the 

presence of RCRA metals as COCs). See Table 2.3. 

• No characteristics of reactivity have been identified (see Table 2.3). 

• There is no evidence of PCBs in soil in excess of 50 parts per million at the Site 

(investigation did not identify PCBs as COCs). See Table 2.4 for documentation. 

• The soil saturation limits for each COC have not been exceeded, with the exception of a 

concentration of 800 mg/kg of tetrachloroethene at SM-GP-108 (8-11) that exceeds the 

limit of 240 mg/kg. As a result, this area will require remedial efforts to allow exclusion of 

exposure pathways. 

• Field observations did not indicate the presence of “free product” or COC saturated soil. 

As a result of the above, pathway exclusion, with the noted exception, is allowable per IAC 

Section 742.300 (Subpart C: Exposure Route Evaluation). 

A summary of soil and groundwater sample analysis results in which constituent concentrations 

are above applicable TACO Tier 1 ROs (COCs) are provided in Table 1.1. The following 

section establishes the baseline TACO conditions at the Site, followed next by a summary of the 

TACO Tier 1 evaluation. 

6.2 BASELINE TACO CONDITIONS 

The results of the CSI have established the baseline TACO conditions for the Site and a 

delineation of the vertical and horizontal extent of COCs. The confirmed Site COCs include: 

‣ Soils: VOCs 

‣ Groundwater: VOCs and Metals. 

The analytical results obtained through the CSI were compared to the Tier 1 ROs of Title 35 of 

the Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives 

(TACO), effective February 15, 2007. Further, analytical and physical site data were considered 

in accordance with 35 IAC Part 742, Subpart C; Exposure Route Evaluations. 

6.2.1 MIGRATION PATHWAYS, EXPOSURE ROUTES AND RECEPTORS 

Existing and potential migration pathways that could transport contaminants off-site include 

underground utilities that exit the property, groundwater, fugitive dust, and surface water runoff. 

Utility Review and Potential Migration Pathway Evaluation 

Information relative to underground utilities was compiled from V3’s review of available historic 

site documentation, site observations, and site engineering plans. Electrical lines for the Site 

building are located overhead. Existing underground utilities located within the Site include 

sanitary sewer lines, gas lines and water mains (Figure 1.3). The gas lines enter Spartans’ 

Square Shopping Center on the south side of the building and then run to the east where the 

line connects with the main gas line, which is located in the Route 53 right of way. The water 

line also enters Spartans’ Square on the south side of the building and branches to the east and 

then north within an easement along Access Drive. Just north of the building, the water main 

branches to the northwest through the north parking lots at the Site. 



The sanitary sewer generally parallels the water main outside of the building. Of special interest 

to this investigation are the location of the sewers and floor drains inside the building. There are 

several floor drains located in the maintenance room and restroom in the Laundromat. These 

floor drains, in addition to floor drains located in the former Mexican Restaurant, connect to a 

sewer that parallels the southern wall of the building and leaves the building from the southeast 

corner of the former Mexican Restaurant. Site borings and wells were placed in areas to 

evaluate Site RECs and also assess whether any impacts to utilities could be determined. 

Accessible manholes were evaluated for any visual impacts or odors, which were not identified. 

Although there are no specific redevelopment plans for the Site, additional utilities may be 

installed as part of redevelopment activities for the Site or adjacent sites. During future remedial 

activities and any utility construction, measures will be evaluated to address any potential for 

migration of COCs. 

Potential Exposure Pathways and Receptors 

Potential exposure routes at the Site include soil ingestion, soil inhalation, soil migration to 

Class I groundwater ingestion and the Class I groundwater ingestion exposure route. Based on 

current and future land use (commercial/retail and construction worker), potential receptors for 

the soil exposure routes at the Site include the industrial/commercial and construction worker 

populations. Potential receptors for COCs within the shallow groundwater system include users 

of known community, industrial and/or private potable water wells. Based upon the findings of 

the well survey discussed in Section 2.5.5, there are no potable water supply wells on-site, the 

Site is not located within the setback of any potable water well and is located within a restricted 

groundwater use area based on a groundwater ordinance. Future potable water service for the 

Site will continue to be provided by a municipal supply. As a result, there is no evidence of 

existing or potential shallow groundwater receptors associated with the direct ingestion of 

groundwater via potable water well. 

6.2.2 GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION 

As discussed in Section 2.5.4– Site Hydrogeology, the groundwater beneath the Site classifies 

as Class I: Potable Resource Groundwater, in accordance with Title 35: Environmental 

Protection, Subtitle F: Public Water Supplies, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board Part 620b: 

Groundwater Classification. 

6.3 TACO TIER 1 EVALUATION 

To define the nature and extent of contamination at the Site, and evaluate possible transport of 

contaminants, investigation analytical results were compared to the Tier 1 ROs for 

Industrial/Commercial Properties and the Construction Worker Population. 

The following exposure routes were evaluated: 

• Soil ingestion for the industrial/commercial and construction worker receptor population, 

• Soil inhalation for the industrial/commercial and construction worker receptor population, 

• Class I groundwater ingestion based on the migration potential of concentrations 

detected in soils, and 

• Class I groundwater ingestion. 



As summarized in (Tables 1.1, 2.1 to 2.5 and 3.1 to 3.2), analytical soil and groundwater 

results were compared to the applicable Tier 1 ROs for industrial/commercial land use and the 

construction worker population. 

6.3.1 VOCS IMPACTS FROM FORMER DRY CLEANING OPERATIONS 

Based upon evaluation of data, the following constituents were detected in above Tier 1 ROs: 

Soil Ingestion Exposure Route: 

Evaluation of the site data indicate the Tier 1 ingestion RO for industrial-commercial use is 

exceeded for the following COC: 

• One VOC (tetrachloroethene) in sample SM-GP-108(10-11). 

Construction-worker ingestion ROs were not exceeded. Removal of the impacted soil or 

installation and maintenance of a barrier to exclude the ingestion pathway would be required in 

the areas where the soil ingestion exposure route RO is exceeded. 

Soil Inhalation Exposure Route: 

Evaluation of the site data indicate the Tier 1 inhalation RO for the industrial/commercial and 

construction worker scenario is exceeded for the following COC: 

• One VOC (tetrachloroethene) in samples SM-GP-08(8-10) and SM-GP-108(10-11). 

Removal of the impacted soil or installation and maintenance of a barrier to exclude the 

ingestion pathway, and worker notification would be required in the areas where the soil 

inhalation exposure route RO is exceeded. 

Soil Component of the Groundwater Ingestion Exposure Route: 

Evaluation of the site data indicate the Tier 1 soil component of the Class I groundwater 

ingestion route ROs are exceeded for the following COCs: 

• Tetrachloroethene in samples SM-GP-03(0-2), SM-GP-07(10-12), SM-GP-08(8-10), SM- 

GP-103(10-11), SM-GP-104(10-11), SM-GP-107(2-3), SM-GP-107(7-9), SM-GP-108(10- 

11), SM-GP-110(10-11), SM-GP-111(8-9), SM-GP-114(8-9), SM-GP-115(7.5-8.5), SM- 

GP-116(7.5-8.5) and SM-GP-117(10-11). 

• Trichloroethene in sample SM-GP-108(10-11). 

Institutional controls and groundwater modeling will be applied to exclude the ingestion pathway 

in the areas where the soil component of the Class I groundwater ingestion exposure route RO 

is exceeded. 

Groundwater Direct Ingestion Exposure Route: Groundwater samples were collected, analyzed, 

and compared to Class I groundwater ROs. Based upon the evaluation of data, the following 

constituents were detected at concentrations above Class I groundwater ROs: 

• Tetrachloroethene in samples SM-GP-07(GW), SM-GP-08(GW), SM-GP-108, SM-GP- 

117, SM-MW-01, SM-MW-02 and SM-MW-03. 



• Bromodichloromethane and Chloroform in samples SM-MW-02 and SM-MW-03. 

• Bromoform in sample SM-MW-02. 

Institutional controls and groundwater modeling will be applied to exclude the ingestion pathway 

in the areas where the Class I groundwater ingestion exposure route RO is exceeded. 

6.3.2 METALS IN GROUNDWATER 

Groundwater Direct Ingestion Exposure Route: Groundwater samples were collected, analyzed, 

and compared to Class I groundwater ROs. Based upon the evaluation of data, the following 

constituents were detected at concentrations above Class I groundwater ROs: 

• Aluminum, iron, lead and manganese in samples SM-MW-01 and SM-GP-04. 

The low-level metals concentrations detected in the wells may be a result of sediment-laden 

samples and additional sampling may be conducted. If the wells are not re-sampled, then 

institutional controls and groundwater modeling will be used to exclude the ingestion pathway in 

the areas where Class I groundwater RO is exceeded. 

6.4 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES 

The following presents the proposed Site remediation objectives (ROs), as well as the 

institutional controls necessary for development of site-specific ROs. 



‣ Tier 1 Industrial-Commercial and Construction Worker ROs for the soil inhalation and 


‣ Tier 2 soil component of the Class I groundwater ingestion and Tier 2 Class I direct 








Section 742.1000 (Subpart J; IAC Part 742) requires the establishment of institutional controls 

for ROs developed based on industrial-commercial property use and the exclusion of exposure 

routes/pathways. As per Section 742.1000(a), institutional controls will be placed on the Site 

that would: 



notification; 




‣ The Village of Romeoville maintains a limited groundwater ordinance which prohibits 

the use of groundwater for potable purposes (See Figure 2.2). To exclude the 

groundwater ingestion route, the ordinance, accepted by IEPA for use an institutional 

control, will be invoked as a groundwater use restriction at the Site and adjoining 

properties and will move the compliance point to the Site boundaries. 



[Note: At this time it is anticipated that soil are isolated and limited and will be excavated 

and disposed to avoid the need for engineered barriers to exclude industrial-commercial 

soil ingestion and inhalation exposure pathways. 

As per Section 742.310(b), the soil ingestion route may be excluded if an appropriate 

engineered barrier, as set forth in Subpart K, is installed. 

The No Further Remediation (NFR) letter will require current and future property owners to 

maintain the integrity of any specified barriers, as well as restrict all subsurface construction to 

qualified personnel (i.e., in accordance with applicable OSHA regulations) as applicable to the 

specified areas. Section 742.320 specifies the conditions under which the groundwater 

ingestion exposure route may be excluded. 

At this time it anticipated that the identified ROs, along with the described remedial measures, 

will be proposed in a future Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to address and exclude exposure 

routes at the Site: 

Active Remediation 

Active remediation is anticipated to address the identified soil saturation PCE location. In 

addition, excavation will eliminate the Tier 1 ROs exceedances identified at the following sample 

locations: 

• SM-GP-108, 

• SM-GP-107, and 

• SM-GP-08. 

Based on the approval of Tier 1 and 2 evaluations and the successful implementation of 

remedial measures and institutional controls, the Site can qualify for comprehensive NFR letter 

determination. 



7.0 CONCLUSIONS 

This report documents the completion of the Comprehensive Site Investigation (Sections 1.0 

through 5.0) and the development and specification of remediation objectives (Section 6.0). 

From January 2008 through May 2009, V3 Companies performed an investigation of the 

remediation site (Site) known as the Spartans’ Square Shopping Center. A Site-specific 

Sampling Plan was developed with data obtained during previous environmental investigations 

(by V3 and others) related to the Site. This data, in conjunction with the data and evaluations 

obtained from V3’s Site Investigation, form a Comprehensive Site Investigation and 

Remediation Objectives Report (CSI/ROR), performed in conformance with the requirements of 

35 IAC Section 740.420, 740.425, 740.440 and 740.445, and provide a complete presentation 

of historical data and investigations related to the Site. It is the LPE’s judgment the data and 

associated evaluations of this CSI/ROR are adequate for characterization of the identified Site 

RECs. 

The following RECs were investigated during the course of this CSI, with the indicated results: 

• REC 1: Former Dry Cleaning Operations 

• REC 2: Hydraulic Lifts 

• REC 3: East Adjacent Gas Station 

Based upon the findings of the field observations and laboratory sample analysis, V3 has not 

identified impacts associated with REC 2 and REC 3. As a result, V3 has redefined the three 

previously defined Site RECs as two RECs: 



Site. 



The following summarizes general site conditions: 

Site COCs: The analytical data obtained from respective RECs indicates the primary COCs 

at the Site are VOCs (soil and groundwater) and metals (metals). The main VOC issues are 

likely resulting from the former dry cleaners located at the Site. The metals identified may 

be the result of sediment-laden samples and not indicative of any historical Site operations. 

Source Materials/Free Product: The soil saturation limit for tetrachloroethene was exceeded 

in one sampling location (SM-GP-108). 

Migration Pathways: Groundwater results and the general groundwater flow direction 

indicate the potential for off site migration. Post-remediation Tier 2 modeling will be 

conducted on VOCs and metals that exceed Class I soil migration to groundwater ingestion 

and Class I groundwater ingestion ROs. 



A Tier 1 RO evaluation of Site data indicates the following: 

‣ The exposure pathway of concern for metals is only the Tier 1 direct groundwater 

ingestion route. 

‣ The exposure pathways of concern for VOCs are Tier 1 soil ingestion, inhalation, soil 

component of the groundwater ingestion route and direct groundwater ingestion. 



• Tier 1 Industrial-Commercial and Construction Worker ROs for the soil inhalation and 


• Tier 2 soil component of the Class I groundwater ingestion and Tier 2 Class I direct 








Institutional controls will be placed on the Site that would: 



notification; 




Based on the approval of Tier 1 and 2 evaluations and the implementation of future remedial 

actions and institutional controls, the Site can qualify for an NFR determination: 

A separate remedial action plan (RAP) will be submitted for IEPA approval prior to any cleanup 

actions. 



8.0 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AFFIRMATION 

I attest that the Site investigation, with the exception of those performed by others (ERS), that 

are the subject of this report were performed under my direction and this document and all 

attachments were prepared under my direction or reviewed by me, and, to the best of my 

knowledge and belief, the work described in the report has been designed or completed in 

accordance with the Act, 35 Ill. Adm. Code 740, and generally accepted engineering practices, 

and the information presented is accurate and complete, except as otherwise noted. 

Rachael K. Berthiaume, P.E. 

V3 COMPANIES, LTD. 

05-21-10 

Date 



FIIGURES

± 

Site 

Boundary 

400 0 400 800 

Feet 

V3 Companies 

7325 Janes Avenue 

Woodridge, IL 60517 

630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 

Site Location Map 

PROJECT AND SITE LOCATION: 

Spartans' Square Shopping Center 

NWC Illinois Route 53 and Alexander Circle 

Romeoville, Illinois 60446 

BASE LAYER: PROJECT NO. FIGURE: SHEET: 

OF: 

USGS Topographic Map (1993) 

07292 1.1 

CLIENT: QUADRANGLE: DATE: SCALE: 

Village of Romeoville 

13 Montrose Drive 


Romeoville, IL 12/04/09 See Scale Bar 

1 

1

± 

Various Retail & 

Commercial Businesses 

Phelps Avenue 

Various Retail 

& Commercial 

Businesses 

Townhall Drive 

Site 

Boundary 

Terrace Lane 

Parking 

Lot 

Access Drive 

£¤ 53 

Phillips 66 

Gas Station 

Alexander Circle 

Various Retail & 

Commercial Businesses 

Shell 

Gas 

Station 

Route 66 

Auto Mart 

100 0 100 200 

Feet 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 







AirPhotoUSA (2008) 

07292 1.2 

OF: 





N/A 

12/04/09 See Scale Bar 

1 

1

FIGbase07292.dgn 5/16/2010 1:02:18 PM

FIGgwcontour07292.dgn 5/14/2010 12:49:50 PM

± 

1 2 

!(!( 

!( 

Legend 

Community Well Supply (CWS) 

CWS 200ft. Minimum Setback Zone 

CWS 400ft. Minimum Setback Zone 

Groundwater Ordinance 

Property Boundary 

2500ft. Radius of Search Boundary 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 

Water Well Survey Map 


400 0 400 800 

Feet 





OF: 


07292 2.2 





Romeoville, IL 12/03/09 See Scale Bar 

1 

1

FIGRECs07292.dgn 5/16/2010 1:07:17 PM

FIGbor_well07292.dgn 5/16/2010 2:20:23 PM

FIGbor_exceed07292.dgn 5/19/2010 4:46:46 PM

FIGwell_exceed07292.dgn 5/19/2010 4:35:03 PM

TABLES

Table 1.1 

Summary of Soil and Groundwater Samples Above TACO Tier 1 ROs 

Spartans Square Shopping Center, Romeoville, IL 

ANALYSES 

PERFORMED 

TIER 1 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES EXCEEDANCES 

SAMPLE I.D. 

Soil Sample 

Depth 

Soil Sample 

Groundwater Sample 

VOCs 

BTEX+MTBE 

SVOCs 

PNAs 

TAL Metals 

Pesticides/PCBs 

Exceedances of 

TACO Tier 1 

Remediation 

Objectives 

Industrial-Commercial 

Construction Worker 

Residential 

Soil Component of 

the Groundwater 

Ingestion Exposure 

Route 

Groundwater 

Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation Class I Class I 

ERS Monitoring Wells 

MW-9 

(Sampled by ERS 

10/11/06) X X X 5 PNAs BAA, BBF, BKF, BAP, IP 

MW-10 

(Sampled by ERS 

10/11/06) X X X 4 PNAs 

MW-10 

(Sampled by V3 

11/19/08) X X X 

V3 Investigation January 2008 

SM-GP-01 0-2 X X 

SM-GP-02 2-4 X X 

SM-GP-03 

0-2 X X 1 VOC PCE 

6-7 X X 

SM-GP-04 0-2 X X 

SM-GP-05 

0-2 X X 

2-4 X X 

BAA, BBF, BKF, BAP (see 

updated V3 sample) 

SM-GP-07 10-12 X X 1 VOC PCE PCE PCE 

SM-GP-07-GW 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-07 X X 1 VOC PCE 

SM-GP-08 8-10 X X 1 VOC PCE PCE PCE PCE PCE 

SM-GP-08-GW 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-08 X X 1 VOC PCE 

SM-GP-09 0-2 X X 

V3 Supplemental Investigation April 2008 

Soil 

SM-GP-10 4-6 X X 

SM-GP-11 6-8 X X 

SM-GP-12 4-6 X X 

SM-GP-13 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-13 X X 

SM-GP-14 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-14 [off-Site] X X 

SM-GP-15 0-2 X X 

SM-GP-15 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-15 X X 

SM-GP-16 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-16 X X 

SM-GP-17 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-17 X X 

SM-GP-18 (GW) 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-18 X X 

V3/OSE Supplemental Investigation November 2008 

Soil 

X101 

SM-GP-101 10-12 X X X X 

X102 

SM-GP-102 14-16 X X X X X X 

X103 

SM-GP-103 10-11 X X 1 VOC PCE 

X104 

SM-GP-104 10-11 X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X105A 

SM-GP-105 2-3 X X 

X105B 

SM-GP-105 10-11 X X 

G105 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-105 X X 

X106 

SM-GP-106 10-11 X X 

G106 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-106 X X 

X107A 

SM-GP-107 MS/MSD 2-3 X X 1 VOC PCE 

X107B 

SM-GP-107 MS/MSD 7-9 X X 1 VOC PCE 

X108A 

SM-GP-108 2-3 X X X 

X108B 

SM-GP-108 MS/MSD 10-11 X X X 

2 VOCs, Exceeds 

Soil Sat. for PCE PCE PCE PCE PCE PCE PCE, TCE 

G108 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-108 X X X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X110A 

SM-GP-110 2-3 X X 

X110B 

SM-GP-110 10-11 X X 1 VOC PCE 

G110 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-110 X X 

X111A 

SM-GP-111 2-3 X X X X X 

X111B 

SM-GP-111 8-9 X X X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X112A 

SM-GP-112 2-3 X X 

X112B 

SM-GP-112 8-9 X X 

X113A 

SM-GP-113 5-6 X X 

X113B 

SM-GP-113 7-8 X X 

X114A 

SM-GP-114 2-3 X X X X X 

E:\2007\07292\Calculations & Data\Natural Resources\Environmental\TACO Tables\V3 Summary Table-Spartans Square.xls 

5/17/2010 

1 of 2

Table 1.1 

Summary of Soil and Groundwater Samples Above TACO Tier 1 ROs 

Spartans Square Shopping Center, Romeoville, IL 

ANALYSES 

PERFORMED 

TIER 1 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES EXCEEDANCES 

SAMPLE I.D. 

Soil Sample 

Depth 

Soil Sample 

Groundwater Sample 

VOCs 

BTEX+MTBE 

SVOCs 

PNAs 

TAL Metals 

Pesticides/PCBs 

Exceedances of 

TACO Tier 1 

Remediation 

Objectives 



Residential 



Ingestion Exposure 

Route 

Groundwater 

Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation Class I Class I 

X114B 

SM-GP-114 8-9 X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X115 

SM-GP-115 7.5-8.5 X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X116 

SM-GP-116 7.5-8.5 X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X11 7 

SM-GP-117 10-11 X X X X X 1 VOC PCE 

G117 

(Temp Well) 

SM-GP-117 X X X X X X 1 VOC PCE 

X118A 

SM-GP-118 2-3 X X 

X118B 

SM-GP-118 9-10 X X 

V3/OSE Well Installation May 2009 

G101 

SM-MW-01 

G101 MS/MSD X X X X X 1 VOC, 3 Metals PCE, Al, Fe, Pb, Mn 

G102 

SM-MW-02 X X X X X 4 VOCs 

PCE, BDM, Bromoform, 

Chloroform 

G103 

SM-MW-03 X X X X X 3 VOCs BDM, Chloroform, PCE 

G104 

SM-MW-04 X X X X X 4 Metals Al, Fe, Pb, Mn 

BAA =Benzo(a)anthracene, BBF= Benzo(b)fluoranthene, BAP=Benzo(a)pyrene, BKF=benzo(k)flouranthene, IP=Indeno(1,2,3, cd)pyrene 

PCE= Tetrachloroethene, BDM= Bromodichloromethane 

Chemicals with laboratory reporting limits > Remediation Objectives are not indicated on this table. 

Al=Aluminum, Fe=Iron, Pb=Lead, Mn=Manganese MS/MSD = Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate SM-GP-101 = V3 Geoprobe (GP) Location 

X112 = OSE Sample/Boring Location G105 = OSE Sample/Well Location SM-MW-01 = V3 Monitoring Well (MW) Location 

E:\2007\07292\Calculations & Data\Natural Resources\Environmental\TACO Tables\V3 Summary Table-Spartans Square.xls 

5/17/2010 

2 of 2

TABLE 2.1 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (VOCs) 


ROMEOVILLE, IL 

Industrial- 

Commercial 


Exposure Route-Specific Values for Soils 


Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Route Values 

Residential 

Exposure Route- 

Specific Values for 

Soils 

Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Exposure 

Route Values 

1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 4/11/08 11/17/2008 

SM-GP-01 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-02 

(2-4) 

SM-GP-03 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-03 

(6-7) 

SM-GP-04 

(0-2) 

V3 Soil Samples 

SM-GP-05 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-05 

(2-4) 

SM-GP-07 

(10-12) 

SM-GP-08 

(8-10) 

SM-GP-09 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-15 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-101 

X101 

Chemical Name 

Volatile Organic Compounds (Method 5035A/8260B) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 6-7 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 10-12 ft 8-10 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 10-12 ft 

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

Acetone ---- g 100000 d ---- g 100000 d 25 b 70,000 b 100000 d 25 b *




Industrial- 

Commercial 




Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Route Values 

Residential 



Soils 

Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Exposure 

Route Values 

11/17/2008 11/17/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 

SM-GP-102 

X102 

SM-GP-103 

X103 

SM-GP-104 

X104 

SM-GP-105 

X105A 

SM-GP-105 

X105B 


SM-GP-06 

X106 

SM-GP-107 

X107A 

MS/MSD 

SM-GP-107 

X107B 

SM-GP-108 

X108A 

SM-GP-108 

X108B & 

MS/MSD 

SM-GP-110 

X110A 

SM-GP-110 

X110B 

Chemical Name 


Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Acetone ---- g 100000 d ---- g 100000 d 25 b 70,000 b 100000 d 25 b * 

Benzene 100 e 1.6 e 2300 e 2.2 e 0.03 12 e 0.8 e 0.03 * 

Bromodichloromethane (Dichlorobromomethane) 92 e 3,000 d 2,000 e 3,000 d 0.6 10 e 3000 d 0.6 * 

Bromoform 720 e 100 e 16,000 e 140 e 0.8 81 e 53 e 0.8 * 

Bromomethane ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

2-Butanone ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

Carbon disulfide 200,000 b 720 d 20,000 b 9.0 b 32 b 7800 b 720 d, x 32 b * 

Carbon tetrachloride 44 e 0.64 e 410 b 0.90 e 0.07 5 e 0.3 e 0.07 * 

Chlorobenzene (Monochlorobenzene) 41,000 b 210 b 4,100 b 1.3 b 1 1600 b 130 b, x 1 * 

Chlorodibromomethane (Dibromochloromethane) 41,000 b 1,300 d 41,000 b 1,300 d 0.4 1600 b 1300 b 0.4 * 

Chloroethane [NT] 820,000b 1500d 82000b 94b 15b 31000b 1500d 15b ** 

Chloroform 940 e 0.54 e 2,000 b 0.76 e 0.6 100 e 0.3 e 0.6 * 

Chloromethane [NT] 8,200 b 170 b 820 b 1.1 b 0.14 b 310 b 110 b 0.14 b ** 

1,1-Dichloroethane 200,000 b 1,700 d 200,000 b 130 b 23 b 7800 b 1300 b, x 23 b * 

1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene dichloride) 63 e 0.70 e 1,400 e 0.99 e 0.02 7 e 0.4 e 0.02 * 

1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 100,000 b 470 d 10000 b 3.0 b 0.06 3900 b 290 b, x 0.06 * 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 20000 b 1200 d 20000 b 1200 d 0.4 780 b 1200 d 0.4 * 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 41,000 b 3,100 d 41,000 b 3,100 d 0.7 1600 b 3100 d 0.7 * 

1,2-Dichloropropane 84 e 23 b 1,800 e 0.50 b 0.03 9 e 15 b, x 0.03 * 

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene (1) 57 e 2.1 e 1200 e 0.39 b 0.004 e 6.4 e 1.1 e, x 0.004 e 0.005 

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (1) 57 e 2.1 e 1200 e 0.39 b 0.004 e 6.4 e 1.1 e, x 0.004 e 0.005 

Ethylbenzene 200,000 b 400 d 20000 b 58 b 13 7800 b 400 d, x 13 * 

2-Hexanone [NT] 82000 b 110 b 8,200 b 0.72 b 1.3 b 3,100 b 70 b 1.3 b ** 

4-Methyl-2-pentanone ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 760 e 24 e 12,000 b 34 e 0.02 e 85 e 13 e 0.02 e * 

MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl ether) 20,000 b 8,800 d 2,000 b 140 b 0.32 780 b 8,800 d, x 0.32 * 

Styrene 410,000 b 1,500 d 41,000 b 430 b 4 16000 b 1500 d, x 4 * 

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [NT] 120,000b 2,000d 12,000b 2,000d 3.3b 4,700b 2,000d 3.3b ** 

Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene) 110 e 20 e 2,400 e 28 e 0.06 12 e 11 e 0.06 * 

Toluene 410000 b 650 d 410000 b 42 b 12 16000 b 650 d, x 12 * 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 

---c 

1,200 d --c 1,200 d 2 

---c 

1200 d 2 * 

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8,200 b 1,800 d 8,200 b 1,800 d 0.02 310 b 1800 d 0.02 * 

Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) 520 e 8.9 e 1200 b 12 e 0.06 58 e 5 e 0.06 * 

Vinyl Acetate 1,000,000 b 1,600 b 200,000 b 10 b 170 b 78000 b 1000 b, x 170 b * 

Vinyl Chloride 7.9 e 1.1 e 170 e 1.1 b 0.01 0.46 e 0.28 e 0.01 * 

Xylenes (total) 410000 b 320 d 41000 b 5.6 b 150 16000 b 320 d, x 150 * 

Part 742 Notes 

* indicates that the ADL is less than or equal to the specified remediation objective. 

** indicates that the value is not listed in TACO, Section 742, Table A or B. 

NA means Not Available; no PQL or EQL available in USEPA analytical methods. 

V3 Table Notes: 

0.11 Indicates exceedance of Tier 1 residential objective 

0.11 Indicates exceedance of Tier 1 residential and/or commercial/industrial objectives 

(1) indicates value is for (1,3-Dichloropropylene, cis+trans) 

[NT] 

[NT] indicates Non-TACO Chemical, some values are provisional objectives and are subject to change. Non-TACO Chemical 

Remediation Objectives are prepared by the IEPA Toxicity Assessment Unit, May 1, 2007. 

Non-TACO values from http://www.epa.state.il.us/land/taco/chemicals-not-in-taco-tier-1-tables.html 

--- --- indicates chemical not analyzed or not sampled 

See attached for soil remediation objective notations 

Prepared by JJP Date 4/28/2008 

Checked by CAM Date 4/28/2008 

Class I 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Class I 

(mg/kg) 

ADL 

(mg/kg) 

14-16 ft 10-11 ft 10-11 ft 2-3 ft 10-11 ft 10-11 ft 2-3 ft 7-9 ft 2-3 ft 10-11 ft 2-3 ft 10-11 ft 

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

0.013




Industrial- 

Commercial 




Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Route Values 

Residential 



Soils 

Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Exposure 

Route Values 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 

SM-GP-111 

X111A 

SM-GP-111 

X111B 

SM-GP-112 

X112A 

SM-GP-112 

X112B 

SM-GP-113 

X113A 

SM-GP-113 

X113B 


SM-GP-114 

X114A 

SM-GP-114 

X114B 

SM-GP-115 

X115 

SM-GP-116 

X116 

SM-GP-117 

X117 

SM-GP-118 

X118A 

SM-GP-118 

X118B 

Chemical Name 


Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Acetone ---- g 100000 d ---- g 100000 d 25 b 70,000 b 100000 d 25 b * 

Benzene 100 e 1.6 e 2300 e 2.2 e 0.03 12 e 0.8 e 0.03 * 

Bromodichloromethane (Dichlorobromomethane) 92 e 3,000 d 2,000 e 3,000 d 0.6 10 e 3000 d 0.6 * 

Bromoform 720 e 100 e 16,000 e 140 e 0.8 81 e 53 e 0.8 * 

Bromomethane ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

2-Butanone ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

Carbon disulfide 200,000 b 720 d 20,000 b 9.0 b 32 b 7800 b 720 d, x 32 b * 

Carbon tetrachloride 44 e 0.64 e 410 b 0.90 e 0.07 5 e 0.3 e 0.07 * 

Chlorobenzene (Monochlorobenzene) 41,000 b 210 b 4,100 b 1.3 b 1 1600 b 130 b, x 1 * 

Chlorodibromomethane (Dibromochloromethane) 41,000 b 1,300 d 41,000 b 1,300 d 0.4 1600 b 1300 b 0.4 * 

Chloroethane [NT] 820,000b 1500d 82000b 94b 15b 31000b 1500d 15b ** 

Chloroform 940 e 0.54 e 2,000 b 0.76 e 0.6 100 e 0.3 e 0.6 * 

Chloromethane [NT] 8,200 b 170 b 820 b 1.1 b 0.14 b 310 b 110 b 0.14 b ** 

1,1-Dichloroethane 200,000 b 1,700 d 200,000 b 130 b 23 b 7800 b 1300 b, x 23 b * 

1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene dichloride) 63 e 0.70 e 1,400 e 0.99 e 0.02 7 e 0.4 e 0.02 * 

1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 100,000 b 470 d 10000 b 3.0 b 0.06 3900 b 290 b, x 0.06 * 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 20000 b 1200 d 20000 b 1200 d 0.4 780 b 1200 d 0.4 * 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 41,000 b 3,100 d 41,000 b 3,100 d 0.7 1600 b 3100 d 0.7 * 

1,2-Dichloropropane 84 e 23 b 1,800 e 0.50 b 0.03 9 e 15 b, x 0.03 * 

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene (1) 57 e 2.1 e 1200 e 0.39 b 0.004 e 6.4 e 1.1 e, x 0.004 e 0.005 

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (1) 57 e 2.1 e 1200 e 0.39 b 0.004 e 6.4 e 1.1 e, x 0.004 e 0.005 

Ethylbenzene 200,000 b 400 d 20000 b 58 b 13 7800 b 400 d, x 13 * 

2-Hexanone [NT] 82000 b 110 b 8,200 b 0.72 b 1.3 b 3,100 b 70 b 1.3 b ** 

4-Methyl-2-pentanone ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 

Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 760 e 24 e 12,000 b 34 e 0.02 e 85 e 13 e 0.02 e * 

MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl ether) 20,000 b 8,800 d 2,000 b 140 b 0.32 780 b 8,800 d, x 0.32 * 

Styrene 410,000 b 1,500 d 41,000 b 430 b 4 16000 b 1500 d, x 4 * 

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [NT] 120,000b 2,000d 12,000b 2,000d 3.3b 4,700b 2,000d 3.3b ** 

Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene) 110 e 20 e 2,400 e 28 e 0.06 12 e 11 e 0.06 * 

Toluene 410000 b 650 d 410000 b 42 b 12 16000 b 650 d, x 12 * 


---c 

1,200 d --c 1,200 d 2 

---c 

1200 d 2 * 

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8,200 b 1,800 d 8,200 b 1,800 d 0.02 310 b 1800 d 0.02 * 

Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) 520 e 8.9 e 1200 b 12 e 0.06 58 e 5 e 0.06 * 

Vinyl Acetate 1,000,000 b 1,600 b 200,000 b 10 b 170 b 78000 b 1000 b, x 170 b * 

Vinyl Chloride 7.9 e 1.1 e 170 e 1.1 b 0.01 0.46 e 0.28 e 0.01 * 

Xylenes (total) 410000 b 320 d 41000 b 5.6 b 150 16000 b 320 d, x 150 * 

Part 742 Notes 

* indicates that the ADL is less than or equal to the specified remediation objective. 

** indicates that the value is not listed in TACO, Section 742, Table A or B. 

NA means Not Available; no PQL or EQL available in USEPA analytical methods. 


0.11 Indicates exceedance of Tier 1 residential objective 

0.11 Indicates exceedance of Tier 1 residential and/or commercial/industrial objectives 

(1) indicates value is for (1,3-Dichloropropylene, cis+trans) 

[NT] 

[NT] indicates Non-TACO Chemical, some values are provisional objectives and are subject to change. Non-TACO Chemical 

Remediation Objectives are prepared by the IEPA Toxicity Assessment Unit, May 1, 2007. 

Non-TACO values from http://www.epa.state.il.us/land/taco/chemicals-not-in-taco-tier-1-tables.html 

--- --- indicates chemical not analyzed or not sampled 

See attached for soil remediation objective notations 

Prepared by JJP Date 4/28/2008 

Checked by CAM Date 4/28/2008 

Class I 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Class I 

(mg/kg) 

ADL 

(mg/kg) 

2-3 ft 8-9 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 5-6 ft 7-8 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 7.5-8.5 ft 7.5-8.5 ft 10-11 ft 2-3 ft 9-10 ft 

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

TABLE 2.2 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (SVOCs) 





Industrial-Commercial Construction Worker 

Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Route Values 

Residential 

Exposure Route-Specific 

Values for Soils 

Soil 

Component of 

the 

Groundwater 

Ingestion 

Exposure 

Route Values 

Background 

Carcinogeni 

c PAH 95th 

Percentile 

Concentratio 

ns 

1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 11/17/2008 11/17/2008 11/17/2008 11/18/2008 11/19/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/17/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/19/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 

SM-GP-01 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-02 

(2-4) 


SM-GP-03 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-10 

(4-6) 

SM-GP-11 

(6-8) 

SM-GP-12 

(4-6) 

SM-GP-101 

X101 

SM-GP-101 

(10-12) 

X-101 

V3 

SM-GP-102 

X102 

SM-GP-104 

X104 

SM-GP-108 

(10-11) 

X-108B 

V3 

SM-GP-111 

X111A 

Phase II V3/OSE Supplemental Investigation 

SM-GP-111 

(8-9) 

X-111B 

V3 

SM-GP-111 

X111B 

SM-GP-112 

(14-16) 

X-112 

V3 

SM-GP-114 

(2-3) 

X-114A 

V3 

SM-GP-114 

X114A 

SM-GP-114 

(8-9) 

X-114B 

V3 

SM-GP-114 

X114B 

SM-GP-115 

(7.5-8.5) 

X-115 

V3 

SM-GP-115 

X115 

SM-GP-116 

X116 

Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation 

Ingestion Inhalation 

Within MSA ADL 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 4-6 ft 6-8 ft 4-6 ft 10-12 ft 10-12 ft 14-16 ft 10-11 ft 10-11 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 8-9 ft 14-16 ft 2-3 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 8-9 ft 7.5-8.5 ft 7.5-8.5 ft 7.5-8.5 ft 

Chemical Name (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Class I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Class I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

Base Neutral/Acid Compounds (Includes Polynuclear Aromatics) * 

Acenaphthene 120000 b -----c 120000 b -----c 570 b 4,700 b -----c 570 b 0.13 *

TABLE 2.3 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (METALS) 



Soil Component of the Groundwater Ingestion 

Industrial-Commerical 

Residential 

A' Counties 

Exposure Route Values ( C' ) 


Within 

11/17/2008 11/17/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/19/2008 

Metropolitan 

C' pH 7.25-7.74 

pH 7.75 - 8.24 

C' pH 8.25 - 

Statistical for 

for 

8.74 for 


Areas B' (For Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater 

Exposure Route-Specific Values for Soils Specific Values for 

Inorganic Ingestion Ingestion Ingestion SM-GP-101 SM-GP-102 SM-GP-111 SM-GP-111 SM-GP-114 SM-GP-114 SM-GP-117 

Industrial-Commerical Construction Worker 

Soils 

Chem.in Class I Class I Class I X101 X102 X111A X111B X114A X114B X117 

Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation Ingestion Inhalation ADL Background Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater 10-12 ft 14-16 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 10-11 ft 

Chemical Name (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Soils) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

INORGANICS (Method - 6010B/7000A) 

Metals (Totals) 

Aluminum [NT] 1,000,000b 1,000,000b 410,000b 870,000 b 78,000b 1,000,000b ** 9500 N/A N/A N/A 13400 13000 3780 4410 4060 2440 4720 

Antimony 820 b -----c 82 b -----c 31 b -----c * 4 5.0 5 5

TABLE 2.4 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (Pesticides/PCBs) 




11/17/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 

Industrial- 

Commercial 




Ingestion Route 

Values 



Soils 

Residential 

SM-GP-102 

X102 

SM-GP-111 

X111A 

SM-GP-111 

X111B 

SM-GP-114 

X114A 

14-16 ft 2-3 ft 8-9 ft 2-3 ft 

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

Chemical Name 

(mg/kg) (mg/kg) 

Pesticides\Insecticides\Herbicide (Method - STATE METHOD USED) 

Aldicarb o 2000 b -----c 200 b -----c 0.013 0.07 78 b ---c NA

TABLE 2.5 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (ORGANIC MATTER) 



SM-GP-101 

X101 

SM-GP-108 

X108A 

SM-GP-114 

X114A 

Clayey Silt Silty Clay Fill Silty Clay Fill 

10-12 feet 2-3 feet 2-3 feet 

Chemical Name 

Organic Matter [%] 

(mg/kg) 

1.40 

(mg/kg) 

1.70 

(mg/kg) 

3.38 

3 Sample OM Average= 2.16 

OM x 0.58 = Fractional organic carbon= 

1.25 

E:\2007\07292\Calculations & Data\Natural Resources\Environmental\TACO Tables\07292_TACO-Tables.xls 

2.5 FOC 5/13/2010

Volatile Organic Compounds (Method - 5030B/8260B) 

ERS Monitoring Wells 

V3 Groundwater Samples 

TABLE 3.1 - GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS (VOCS) 



10/11/06 10/11/06 11/19/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 11/18/08 11/18/08 11/19/08 11/19/08 11/19/08 

Groundwater 

MW-10 

Remediation 

(Sampled SM-GP-07- SM-GP-08- SM-GP-13- SM-GP-14- SM-GP-15- SM-GP-16- SM-GP-17- SM-GP-18- SM-GP-105 SM-GP-106 SM-GP-108 SM-GP-110 SM-GP-117 

Objective MW-9 MW-10 by V3) GW GW GW GW GW GW GW GW G105 G106 G108 G110 G117 

Chemical Name Class I (mg/L) mg/L mg/L mgL mg/L mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mg/L 

Acetone 6.3 --- ---

Chemical Name 


Groundwater 

Remediation 

Objective 

Class I (mg/L) 

Acetone 6.3 

Benzene 

0.005 c 

Bromodichloromethane (Dichlorobromomethane) 

0.0002 a 

Bromoform 

0.001 a 

Bromomethane ** 

2-Butanone ** 

Carbon disulfide 0.7 

Carbon tetrachloride 

0.005 c 

Chlorobenzene (Monochlorobenzene) 

0.1 c 

Chlorodibromomethane (Dibromochloromethane) 0.14 

Chloroethane [NT] 2.8 

Chloroform 

0.0002 a 

Chloromethane [NT] 0.028 

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.7 

1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene dichloride) 

0.005 c 

1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1-Dichloroethylene) b 

0.007 c 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 

0.07 c 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene) 

0.1 c 

1,2-Dichloropropane 

0.005 c 

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene*** 

0.001 a 

trans-1,2-Dichloropropene*** 

0.001 a 

Ethylbenzene 

0.7 c 

2-Hexanone [NT] 0.28 

4-Methyl-2-pentanone ** 

Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 

0.005 c 

Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.07 

Styrene 

0.1 c 

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [NT] 0.42 

Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethylene) 

0.005 c 

Toluene 

1.0 c 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane b 

0.2 c 


0.005 c 

Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) 

0.005 c 

Vinyl Acetate 7.0 

Vinyl Chloride 

0.002 c 

Xylenes (total) 

10.0 c 

Part 742 Notes: 

**indicates that the value is not listed in TACO, Section 742, Table E. 

Chemical Name and Groundwater Remediation Objective Notations 

a The groundwater remediation objective is equal to ADL for carcinogens according to the 

b Oral Reference Dose and/or Reference Concentration under review by USEPA. Listed 

c Value listed is also the Groundwater Quality Standard for this chemical pursuant to 35 Il 

Groundwater or 35 Ill. Adm. Code 620.420 for Class II Groundwater. 


0.1 Indicates exceedance of Tier 1 Class I objectives 

0.1 Indicates laboratory detection limit exceeds Tier 1 RO 

--- -- indicates chemical not analyzed or not sampled 

*** ***indicates value is for (1,3-Dichloropropylene, cis+trans) 


11/18/08 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 

SM-MW-01 

SM-MW-02 

SM-MW-03 SM-MW-04 

VOC Trip G101 SM-MW-02 G102 SM-MW-03 G103 G151 

Blank MS/MSD G102 Field Blank G103 Field Blank (G104) 

mg/L mgL mgL mgL mgL mgL mg/L 

TABLE 3.2 - GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS (SVOCS, Pest/PCBs, Inorganics) 



Groundwater 

Remediation 

ERS GW Samples 

10/11/06 10/11/06 11/19/08 11/19/08 11/19/08 11/19/08 11/19/08 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 5/5/09 

MW-10 

(Sampled 

SM-GP-108 SM-GP-117 


Objective MW-9 MW-10 by V3) G108 G117 MW-10 V3 MS/MSD G102 G103 (G104) 

Chemical Name Class I (mg/L) mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 

Base-Neutral/Acid Compounds (Includes Polynuclear Aromatics) 

Acenaphthene 0.42 0.00025 0.000028

Chemical Name and Soil Remediation Objective Notations (For INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL and CONSTRUCTION WORKER Remediation Objectives) 

a. Soil remediation objectives based on human health criteria only. 

b. Calculated values correspond to a target hazard quotient of 1. 

c. No toxicity criteria available for this route of exposure. 

d. Soil saturation concentration (C[sat]) = the concentration at which the absorptive limits of the soil particles, the solubility limits of the available soil moisture, and saturation of soil pore air have been reached. Above the 

soil saturation concentration, the assumptions regarding vapor transport to air and/or dissolved phase transport to groundwater (for chemicals which are liquid at ambient soil temperatures) have been violated, and 

alternative modeling approaches are required. 

e. Calculated values correspond to a cancer risk level of 1 in 1,000,000. 

f. Deleted from 742. 

g. Chemical-specific properties are such that this route is not of concern at any soil contaminant concentration. 

h. 40 CFR 761 contains applicability requirements and methodologies for the development of PCB remediation objectives. Request for approval of a Tier 3 evaluation must address the applicablity 

of 40 CFR 761. 

i. Soil remediation objective for pH of 6.8. If soil pH is other than 6.8, refer to Appendix B, Tables C and D in this Part. 

j. Ingestion soil remediation objective adjusted by a factor of 0.5 to account for dermal route. 

k. Deleted from 742. 

l. Potential for soil-plant-human exposure. 

m. The person conducting the remediation has the option to use: (1) TCLP or SPLP test results to compare with the remediation objectives listed in this Table; (2) the total amount of contaminant in the soil sample results to compare 

with pH specific remediation objectives listed in Appendix B, Table C or D of this Part (see Section 742.510); or (3) the appropriate background value listed in Appendix A, Table G. If the person conducting the remediation wishes 

to calculate soil remediation objectives based on background concentration, this should be done in accordance with Subpart D of this Part. 

n. The Agency reserves the right to evaluate the potential for remaining contaminant concentrations to pose significant threats to crops, livestock, or wildlife. 

o. For agrichemical facilities, remediation objectives for surficial soils which are based on field application rates may be more appropriate for currently registered pesticides. Consult the Agency for further information. 

p. For agrichemical facilities, soil remediation objectives based on site-specific background concentrations of Nitrate as N may be more appropriate. Such determinations shall be conducted in accordance with the 

procedures set forth in Subparts D and I of this Part. 

q. The TCLP extraction must be done using water at a pH of 7.0. 

r. Value based on dietary Reference Dose. 

s. Value for Ingestion based on Reference Dose for Mercuric chloride (CAS No. 7487-94-7); value for Inhalation based on Reference Concentration for elemental Mercury (CAS No. 7439-97-6). Inhalation remediation objective only applies 

at sites where elemental mercury is a contaminant of concern. 

t. For the ingestion route for arsenic for industrial/commercial, see 742, Appendix A, Table G. 

u. Value based on Reference Dose for thallium sulfate (CAS No. 7446-18-6). 

v. Deleted from 742. 

w. Value based on Reference Dose adjusted for dietary intake. 

x. For any populated areas as defined in Section 742.200, Appendix A, Table H may be used. 

y. Value based on maintaining fetal blood lead below 10 ug/dl, using the USEPA adults Blood Lead Model. 

IC-CW-Notations 5/13/2010

Chemical Name and Soil Remediation Objective Notations (For RESIDENTIAL REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES) 

a. Soil remediation objectives based on human health criteria only. 

b. Calculated values correspond to a target hazard quotient of 1. 

c. No toxicity criteria available for this route of exposure. 

d. Soil saturation concentration (C[sat]) = the concentration at which the absorptive limits of the soil particles, the solubility limits of the available soil moisture, and saturation of soil pore air have been reached. Above the 

soil saturation concentration, the assumptions regarding vapor transport to air and/or dissolved phase transport to groundwater (for chemicals which are liquid at ambient soil temperatures) have been violated, and 

alternative modeling approaches are required. 

e. Calculated values correspond to a cancer risk level of 1 in 1,000,000. 

f. Deleted from 742. 

g. Chemical-specific properties are such that this route is not of concern at any soil contaminant concentration. 

h. 40 CFR 761 contains applicability requirements and methodologies for the development of PCB remediation objectives. Request for approval of a Tier 3 evaluation must address the applicablity 

of 40 CFR 761. 

i. Soil remediation objective for pH of 6.8. If soil pH is other than 6.8, refer to Appendix B, Tables C and D in this Part. 

j. Ingestion soil remediation objective adjusted by a factor of 0.5 to account for dermal route. 

k. A preliminary remediation goal of 400 mg/kg has been set for lead based on Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities , OSWER Directive #9355.4-12. 

l. Potential for soil-plant-human exposure. 

m. The person conducting the remediation has the option to use: (1) TCLP or SPLP test results to compare with the remediation objectives listed in this Table; (2) where applicable, the total amount of contaminant in the soil sample results to compare 

with pH specific remediation objectives listed in Appendix B, Table C or D of this Part (see Section 742.510): or (3) the appropriate background value listed in Appendix A, Table G. If the person conducting the remediation wishes 

to calculate soil remediation objectives based on background concentration, this should be done in accordance with Subpart D of this Part. 

n. The Agency reserves the right to evaluate the potential for remaining contaminant concentrations to pose significant threats to crops, livestock, or wildlife. 

o. For agrichemical facilities, remediation objectives for surficial soils which are based on field application rates may be more appropriate for currently registered pesticides. Consult the Agency for further information. 

p. For agrichemical facilities, soil remediation objectives based on site-specific background concentrations of Nitrate as N may be more appropriate. Such determinations shall be conducted in accordance with the 

procedures set forth in Subparts D and I of this Part. 

q. The TCLP extraction must be done using water at a pH of 7.0. 

r. Value based on dietary Reference Dose. 

s. Value for Ingestion based on Reference Dose for Mercuric chloride (CAS No. 7487-94-7); value for Inhalation based on Reference Concentration for elemental Mercury (CAS No. 7439-97-6). Inhalation remediation objective only applies 

at sites where elemental mercury is a contaminant of concern. 

t. For the ingestion route for arsenic for industrial/commercial, see 742, Appendix A, Table G. 

u. Value based on Reference Dose for thallium sulfate (CAS No. 7446-18-6). 

v. Value based on Reference Dose adjusted for dietary intake. 

w. For sites located in any populated area as defined in Section 742.200, Appendix A, Table H may be used. 

x. The remediation objectives for these chemicals must also include the construction worker inhalation objective in Appendix B, Table B. 

Resid-Notations 5/13/2010

APPENDIIX A 

HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION

February 13, 2008 

Ms. Dawn Caldwell 



Romeoville, IL 60446 

Re: 

Phase I Environmental Assessment 


SWC Illinois Route 53 (Indpendence Blvd.) and Phelps Avenue 


Dear Ms. Caldwell: 

V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd. (V3) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of 

the above-referenced site. The results of this assessment are provided in the enclosed project 

report. This environmental assessment has been conducted under the guidance and protocols 

of the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental 

Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (Standard E1527-2005) 

and the U.S. EPA November 1, 2005 Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; 

Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312). 

Two copies of the report are enclosed for your use. If you have any questions regarding the 

findings provided in this document, please contact us at (630) 724-9200. V3 has enjoyed 

working with you on this project, and hopes to be of further service in the future. 

Sincerely, 

V3 COMPANIES OF ILLINOIS, LTD. 

Margie Lathrop 

Project Manager 

ML/vv 

Enclosure: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (2) 

cc: 

V3 File 

E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase I ESA\07292 Phase I ESA.doc 

V3 COMPANIES OF ILLINOIS LTD. 7325 JANES AVENUE, WOODRIDGE, IL 60517 PH: 630.724.9200 FX: 630.724.9202 V3CO.COM 

 

 

CHICAGO DENVER PHOENIX

PHASE I 

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE 

ASSESSMENT 

PROJECT SITE: 


SWC ILLINOIS ROUTE 53 (INDPENDENCE BLVD.) AND PHELPS AVENUE 

ROMEOVILLE, IL 60446 

PREPARED FOR: 

VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE 

13 MONTROSE DRIVE 

ROMEOVILLE, IL 60446 

PREPARED BY: 


7325 JANES AVENUE 

WOODRIDGE, ILLINOIS 60517 

630.724.9200 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008

SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 

THAT PERFORMED PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 

This report has been prepared by V3 Companies of Illinois (V3), on behalf of Village of 

Romeoville (the User), in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM 

Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment Process (Standard E1527-2005) and the U.S. EPA November 1, 2005 Standards 

and Practices for All Appropriates Inquiries; Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312), unless otherwise 

noted herein. 

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition 

of Environmental Professional as defined in the All Appropriate Inquiry Rule (40 CFR 312.10) 

and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to 

assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have 

developed and performed the all appropriate inquiry in conformance with the standards and 

practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. 

Heidi Radke, P.E. 

Project Engineer 

Margie Lathrop 

Due Diligence Manager 

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 

V3 Companies of Illinois • ii 

Spartans’ Square Shopping Center February 2008 

Romeoville, Illinois 07292

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ v 

2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 

2.1 Purpose & Standards........................................................................................... 1 

2.2 Scope of Services ................................................................................................ 1 

2.3 Assumptions, Limitations & Exceptions ............................................................... 2 

2.4 Special Terms and Conditions ............................................................................. 2 

2.5 The User Reliance ............................................................................................... 3 

2.6 Definitions and Acronyms .................................................................................... 3 

2.7 Published References.......................................................................................... 3 

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 5 

3.1 Current Ownership, Occupant/Use and Management of Property ...................... 5 

3.2 Location and Legal Description............................................................................ 5 

3.3 Site Vicinity General Characteristics.................................................................... 6 

3.4 Description of Site Structures, Roads, and Other Improvements ........................ 6 

4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION................................................................................. 7 

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW........................................................................................................ 7 

5.1 Records Pertaining to Physical Setting................................................................ 7 

5.2 State and Federal Database Search.................................................................... 8 

5.3 Local Records .................................................................................................... 12 

5.4 Previous ESA and/or Site Investigation Reports................................................ 13 

5.5 Title Records...................................................................................................... 13 

5.6 Historical Records Review ................................................................................. 13 

6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS............................................................ 17 

6.1 Limiting Conditions Regarding Methodology ..................................................... 17 

6.2 Site Utilities ........................................................................................................ 17 

6.3 Raw Material Use and Storage .......................................................................... 17 

6.4 Generation, Storage and Disposal of Wastes.................................................... 18 

6.5 Indication of Solid Waste Disposal..................................................................... 18 

6.6 Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................... 18 

6.7 Underground (USTs) and Above-Ground (ASTs) Storage Tanks..................... 19 

6.8 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ............................................... 19 

6.9 Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons.................................................................................... 20 

6.10 Other Conditions of Concern ............................................................................ 20 

6.11 Adjacent Properties........................................................................................... 20 

6.12 Individuals Interviewed...................................................................................... 21 

7.0 NON-SCOPE ASTM E1527 ITEMS............................................................................... 21 

8.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS & CONCLUSIONS ................................................................... 22 

8.1 Identified Data Gaps .......................................................................................... 22 

8.2 Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions ................................................... 22 

8.3 Recognized Environmental Conditions ............................................................. 22 

Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map 

Figure 2 - Site Features Map 

Figure 3 – Tenant Site Map 

LIST OF FIGURES 


V3 Companies of Illinois • iii 



LIST OF APPENDICES 

Appendix I Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 

Appendix II Site Photographs 

Appendix III Site Legal Description/Plat of Survey/Site Plan 

Appendix IV User/Owner Questionnaires and other Interview Documentation 

Appendix V Title Records 

Appendix VI Regulatory Records Database Report 

Appendix VII Federal, State & Local Records 

Appendix VIII Historical Records and Maps 

Appendix IX Previous Reports 

Appendix X Definitions & Acronyms 

Appendix XI Assumptions, limitations & Exceptions 


V3 Companies of Illinois • iv 



1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd. (V3) has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 

of the Spartans' Square Shopping Center located at SWC Illinois Route 53 (Indpendence 

Blvd.) and Phelps Avenue, Romeoville, Will County, Illinois. The report was prepared for 

Village of Romeoville and dated February 13, 2008 (Project #07292). This environmental 

assessment has been conducted under the guidance and protocols of the American Society of 

Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: 

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (Standard E1527-2005) and the U.S. EPA 

November 1, 2005 Standards and Practices for All Appropriates Inquiries; Final Rule (40 CFR 

Part 312). 

Based on a review of available records/documents, past and present site use, adjacent land 

use, map interpretation, and a site inspection, this assessment has revealed no evidence of 

recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property except for the 

following: 

• Three below-ground hydraulic lifts are located south of the building (behind 21 and 23 

Terrace Lane). 

• Historical on-site dry cleaning operations were reportedly performed at the laundromat 

at 7 Terrace Lane. 


Philips 66 Gas Station has impacted the groundwater at the subject site. 


LUST incident at the former Clark Gas Station (northeast adjacent property) has the 

potential to impact the subject site. 

No historical recognized environmental conditions were identified. 

No significant data gaps were identified. 

This section provides only a summary of the information and findings presented in this report, 

and as such, should not be relied upon as a full assessment of the subject property. A 

complete discussion of observations and information is presented in the body of the report. 

The following include important definitions associated with an ASTM Phase I ESA: 

• Recognized environmental conditions are defined by ASTM E 1527-05 as “the presence or 

likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under 

conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release 

of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into 

the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous 

substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The 

term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a 


V3 Companies of Illinois • v 



material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be 

the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate 

governmental agencies.” 

• The term “historical recognized environmental conditions” is typically used to identify 

conditions of past releases that have been addressed to the satisfaction of the responsible 

regulatory agency. Historical recognized environmental conditions are defined in ASTM E 

1527-05 as “an environmental condition, which in the past would have been considered a 

recognized environmental condition, but which may or may not be considered a 

recognized environmental condition currently.” 

• A data gap is defined as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice 

despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. 

Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, 

including, but not limited to site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the 

site visit), and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, 

regulatory officials, etc.). 

Additional definitions are included in Appendix X. 


V3 Companies of Illinois • vi 



2.0 INTRODUCTION 

During December 2007, January 2008, and February 2008, V3 Companies of Illinois 

performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Spartans' Square Shopping 

Center located at SWC Illinois Route 53 (Indpendence Blvd.) and Phelps Avenue, Romeoville, 

Will County, IL. The assessment was performed by the following Environmental 

Professionals: Ms. Heidi Radke, Project Engineer and Ms. Margie Lathrop, Project Manager. 

The professional credentials of the project team are provided in Appendix I. 

2.1 Purpose & Standards 

Purpose of the Phase I ESA 

V3 understands that the User intends to purchase the investigation site. This ESA was 

conducted for the purpose of enabling Village of Romeoville (the User) to satisfy one of the 

requirements related to qualifying as an innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or 

bona fide prospective purchaser, relative to potential CERCLA liability. 

Applicable Standards 

The ESA process constitutes all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of 

the property, consistent with good commercial or customary practice – as defined in 42 U.S.C 

§9601(35)(B), and provides defenses referred to as “landowner liability protections” (“LLPs”). 

Nationwide ESA procedures and protocols have been established relative to the content, 

performance, and documentation of the environmental assessment process. These 

procedures are defined in the standards identified below. 

• American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for 

Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process 

(Standard E1527-2005). 

• U.S. EPA November 1, 2005 Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; 

Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312). 

These standards are referred to throughout this report as “ASTM” and “AAI.” The goal of the 

processes established in these standards is to identify recognized environmental conditions 

(RECs) at the investigation site. RECs are defined as “the presence or likely presence of any 

hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an 

existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances 

or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or 

surface water of the property.” V3 has conducted this ESA and developed this report in 

general accordance with these standards. 

2.2 Scope of Services 

This ESA has been prepared and conducted under the guidance and protocols of the 

ASTM/AAI standards identified above, as set forth in V3’s December 20, 2007 proposal and 

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment V3 Companies of Illinois • 1 



terms with Village of Romeoville. The evaluation process primarily consists of a review of 

historical and current records and information, a site visit, and interview of informed 

individuals. V3 has conducted this assessment consistent with that level of care and skill that 

is standard to the industry. The ASTM standards are not intended to represent or replace the 

standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged. 

Additional Services Related to Non-Scope Items 

The ASTM standard specifically identifies the services listed in the table below as Non-Scope 

Activities (i.e., not within the standard scope of work). As such, the evaluation of these factors 

is considered an additional service. Non-scope items requested by the User to be perfumed in 

conjunction with the assessment are identified below. The specific scope of work for each 

service performed is documented in Section 7.0. 

Non-Scope Activities Performed Not 

Performed 

Asbestos-Containing Building Materials 

X 

Radon 

X 

Wetlands 

X 

Regulatory Compliance 

X 

Industrial Hygiene 

X 

Ecological Resources 

X 

Indoor Air Quality 

X 

Lead-based Paint 

X 

Mold 

X 

Lead in Drinking Water 

X 

Cultural and Historic Resources 

X 

Health and Safety 

X 

Endangered Species 

X 

Biological Agents 

X 

Vapor Intrusion 

X 

Deviation from Scope of Services 

There have been no deviations from the established Scope of Services during the 

performance of this ESA. 

2.3 Assumptions, Limitations & Exceptions 

Assumptions, Limitations and Exceptions are documented in Appendix XI. 

2.4 Special Terms and Conditions 

This ESA report is intended to be used in its entirety. No portion of it may be deleted or used 

out of context without the written consent of V3. The opinions and information contained in 

this report are time sensitive and represent our evaluation of the environmental site conditions 

at the time the services were provided. This report was prepared for a limited use involving a 

single transaction, as set forth herein, and may not be used for any other purpose without the 

written consent of V3. 




Both the ASTM and AAI standards identify certain individuals as having specific obligations 

related to completion of the ESA process, as noted below: 

The User - the party seeking to use Practice E 1527-05 to complete an 

environmental site assessment of the property. A The User may include, without 

limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner 

of property, a lender, or a property manager. 

Environmental Professional (EP) – a person who possesses sufficient specific 

education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment or 

develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or 

threatened releases on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and 

performance factors specified in the ASTM standard. 

The following table identifies the responsibilities of these individuals relative to the execution 

of the ESA. The User is identified later in this report. Information provided by the User is 

included and identified within this ESA report. 

AAI Component 

The 

User 

EP 

Inquiry 

X 

Visual Inspections 

X 

Interviews 

X 

Reviews of Historical Sources 

X 

Reviews of Government Records 

X 

Search for Environmental Cleanup Liens 

X 

Consider “specialized knowledge” 

X 

Consider relationship of purchase price to fair market value of 

property, if contaminated 

X 

Consider “commonly known” information X X 

Consider “degree of obviousness of contamination” X X 

2.5 The User Reliance 

This report has been prepared on behalf of the Village of Romeoville and may not be relied 

upon or disseminated to any third person or entity, other than a commercial financial institution 

or other lender providing financing for the acquisition or improvement of the property subject 

to this report at the time this report is issued. Use of this report by any third party or entity is 

expressly prohibited without the written authorization of Village of Romeoville and V3. As a 

condition precedent to such use, such third party or entity shall agree to be bound by the 

same contractual terms as Village of Romeoville, including those regarding indemnification 

and limitation of liability. 

2.6 Definitions and Acronyms 

A list of definitions and acronyms pertinent to the ESA process are provided in Appendix X. 

2.7 Published References 




The following published documents were reviewed referenced in the evaluation of 

environmental issues discussed in this section of the report: 

ASTM Standards: 

E 1527-05 Standard for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments 

Federal Statutes: 

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 

(“CERCLA” or “Superfund”), as amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization 

Act of 1986 (“SARA”) and Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization 

Act of 2002 (“Brownfields Amendments”), 42 U.S.C. §§9601 et seq. 

Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552, as amended by Public Law No. 104-231, 110 

Stat. 3048 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (sometimes also referred to as the Solid Waste 

Disposal Act), as amended (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C §6901 et seq. 

USEPA Documents: 

“All Appropriate Inquiry” Final Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 312 Chapter 1 EPA, Subchapter J- 

Superfund, Emergency Planning, and Community Right-To-Know Programs, 40 C.F.R 

Parts 300-399 

Additional documents reviewed as part of this assessment are identified in the appropriate 

sections of this report. 




3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 

The following subsections are a compilation of information obtained from the site visit, 

interviews with knowledgeable individuals, and/or documents and records pertaining to the 

site property and/or operations. Additional descriptions regarding site conditions are provided 

in Section 6.0, Site Reconnaissance and Interviews. A Site Location Map is provided as 

Figure 1 and Site Features Map as Figure 2. The configuration of tenant addresses at the 

shopping center were identified on Figure 3. 

3.1 Current Ownership, Occupant/Use and Management of Property 

Property Owner 

Current Occupant 

Current Use 

Property Mgr and/or Owner Rep 

Harris Bank Glencoe-Northbrook N.A., as Trustee Under Trust 

Agreement Dated December 18, 1989 and Known as Trust Number 

L-428 

Various retail stores (See list below) 

Shopping center 

Phil Prassas, Jr. 

Address Square Footage Occupant Current Use 

3 Terrace Lane 1,150 Subway Restaurant 

5 Terrace Lane 1,800 Vacant Vacant – former video 

store 

7 Terrace Lane 3,000 Mrs. Clean Laundromat Self-serve Laundromat 

15 Terrace Lane 4,500 China King Buffet Restaurant 

21 Terrace Lane 15,280 ACE Hardware Hardware store 

23 Terrace Lane 26,917 Vacant Vacant - former grocery 

store 

615 Access Drive 560 Hampton Park Currency Currency exchange 

617 Access Drive 560 The Smoke Stop Tobacco shop 

619-21 Access Drive 1,710 Talk is Cheap Cellular phone shop 

623 Access Drive 855 La Mirage Hair salon 

625 Access Drive 855 Fancy Nails Nail salon 

3.2 Location and Legal Description 

Site Name 


Address 

SWC Illinois Route 53 (Indpendence Blvd.) and Phelps Avenue, Romeoville, IL 

60446 

Township & Range 

Section 27 and 34, Township 37 North, Range 10 East of the Third Principal 

Meridian 

Location 

Southwest corner of the intersection of Illinois Route 53 and Phelps Avenue 

Legal Description See Appendix V for site legal description 

PIN # 12-02-34-101-016 




An ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey was completed by V3 and dated January 14, 2008. The 

site legal description is provided on the survey (see Appendix III). 

3.3 Site Vicinity General Characteristics 

The site is located in a predominantly commercial area. See Section 6.21 for more detailed 

information with respect to adjacent properties. 

3.4 Description of Site Structures, Roads, and Other Improvements 

The site consists of an approximately 9.5-acre parcel improved with a commercial retail 

shopping center called Spartans’ Square Plaza consisting of one building as described below. 

Structure 

Use/Operations 

Approximate Size 

Floors/Stories 

Construction Date 

Materials 

Commercial building 

Retail shopping center 

57,187-square-foot 

One-story, with exception of west end of grocery store is two-story 

The east end of the strip mall was constructed in 1961. The west end was constructed 

in 1971. 

Brick; concrete slab-on-grade foundation 

The building is located in the southeast portion of the parcel. An asphalt parking lot is located 

in the north portion and east portion of the site. Along with entrances off Phelps Avenue, 

Terrace Lane and Access Drive are located on the parcel and provide vehicular access to the 

site. The area south of the building consists of asphalt and concrete pavement and is used for 

store deliveries and the storage of waste dumpsters. The western portion of the site consists 

of manicured grass. 




4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 

Under the ASTM standard, the User is defined as “the party seeking to use Practice E 1527- 

05 to complete an environmental site assessment of the property”. A User may include, 

without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of 

property, a lender, or a property manager.” In the context of this ESA, the User is Village of 

Romeoville. The ASTM standard specifies that the User is required to identify any special 

terms and conditions which must be agreed upon by the EP prior to the initiation of the ESA. 

In addition, the User must provide specific information to the EP during the performance of the 

ESA and is required to complete a questionnaire related to their individual knowledge of 

environmental issues at the site. The completed questionnaire is provided in Appendix IV. 

Any previous reports provided by the User are documented in Section 5.4. Other pertinent 

information obtained from the User is documented in appropriate sections of this report. 

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 

5.1 Records Pertaining to Physical Setting 

A variety of data pertaining to the physical setting of the site property is provided in the 

“Geocheck” section of the EDR report in Appendix VI. Additional data was obtained through 

observations made during the site visit and a review of maps and other published documents 

identified below. The physical setting of the site is summarized as follows: 

USGS Topographic Map 

Property Elevation 

Surface Topography 

Regional Topography 

Site Features 

1993 Romeoville, IL, 7.5 Minute 

610 to 620 ft above mean sea level 

Relatively flat with a gradual slope to the southeast. 

The regional topography appears to slope in a general 

southeasterly direction. 

The site building is shown in the southeast portion of the 

site. No water bodies are indicated on the site. 

Regional/Local Geology: Based on a review of the geological map entitled Potential for 

Contamination of Shallow Aquifers in Illinois: Ill. GS Circular 532, 30 p., Berg, R.C., Kempton, 

J.P., and Cartwright, K. 1984,, the predominant soil type in the area of the site is comprised of 

Type A1 soil, which is “Permeable bedrock at or within 20 feet of land surface, variable 

overlying materials”. The existence of this type of soil in the vicinity of the subject site will 

generally increase the potential for contamination migration. 

Soil borings were conducted by ERS of Illinois, Inc. (ERS) at the subject site as part of a 

subsurface investigation of an adjacent LUST facility to the east (Phillips 66 gas station). 

Boring logs were reviewed in the August 2007 Site Investigation Completion Report (SICR) 

report and indicated soils at two borings were advanced to a depth of 10 feet near the eastern 

site boundary which consisted of silty clay with traces of sand and gravel. At borings 

conducted at the Phillips 66 gas station and adjacent properties, it was reported that bedrock 

was encountered between 7.5 feet to 12 feet below ground surface. 




Hydrogeology: Based on regional topography and physical setting, site groundwater flow 

within the near surface sediments is assumed to follow topography and would likely flow 

towards the southeast towards the Des Plaines River, located approximately one mile 

east/southeast of the subject site. Such local water bodies likely act as discharge points for 

shallow groundwater in the area. However, various environmental reports reviewed in Section 

5.2 indicated that groundwater flow direction is variable in the region. Therefore, anticipated 

groundwater flow direction on-site cannot be determined. 

5.2 State and Federal Database Search 

An ASTM radius search was performed by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). EDR 

obtains, on a regular basis, updated environmental databases from state and federal 

agencies. The radius search findings are presented in Appendix VI (EDR Report 

#2106510.2s) and summarized in the following paragraphs. 

The following table summarizes state agencies contacted by V3 for additional information: 

Requested 

Agency 

Received 

Yes No 

IEPA Bureau of Land X YES 

Not Publicly 

Available 

Unobtainable 

within 

reasonable 

time (20 

calendar 

days) and/or 

cost 

constraints 

Not Practically 

Reviewable 

Pertinent documentation received and reviewed as part of this assessment is presented in 

Appendix VII. Pertinent information is incorporated into the appropriate sections below. 

Registered Underground Storage Tanks (UST). A review of the Illinois State Fire Marshal 

(OSFM) list of registered UST facilities did not identify the site as a registered UST facility. 

Four UST facilities were identified on adjoining properties. The following is a summary of 

information obtained from the EDR report, along with any observations that were made during 

the site area reconnaissance. 

Name Titan Auto Sales Distance Southeast adjacent 

(ft)/Direction property 

Address 639 N. Independence Blvd., Romeoville Gradient Variable 

Regulatory The USTs were listed in the EDR report as Tank Size and Two 6,000-gallon 

Status exempt from registration. No information was 

available to determine if the tanks are still active. 

No releases have been reported. 

Contents gasoline USTs 

The site is currently used as a car dealership, but may have formerly been used as a gas station based on the 

observation of a roof overhang identified during the site inspection. No evidence of the existence of USTs, 

such as fill/vent pipes or gas pumps was observed from the adjacent roadways during the site inspection. 

Based on regulatory status, this UST facility does not represent evidence of a REC in connection with the 

subject site. 




Name Phillips 66 Distance East adjacent 



Regulatory 

Status 

Tank Size and 

Contents 

One 10,000-gallon 

This site is an active gas station. A release was 

reported and the LUST incident is still open (see 

LUST section below). 

gasoline UST, two 

6,000-gallon gasoline 

USTs, one 10,000- 

gallon diesel UST, 

one 12,000-gallon 

diesel UST, one 


UST, and one 2,000- 

gallon kerosene UST 

Based on regulatory status, and proximity to the site, this UST facility represents evidence of a REC in 

connection with the subject site. 

Name Shell Station Distance South adjacent 


Address 1 Alexander Drive, Romeoville Gradient Variable 

Regulatory 

Status 

Tank Size and 

Contents 

Two 10,000-gallon 

This site is an active gas station. A release was 

reported and the LUST incident is still open (see 

LUST section below). 

gasoline USTs, one 


UST, one 1,000- 

gallon used oil UST, 

one 15,000-gallon 

gasoline UST, one 


UST 

Based on regulatory status and proximity to the site, this UST facility represents evidence of a REC in 


Name 

1965 Clark Service Station (gas station is no 

longer in operation, currently occupied by 

Romeoville Laser) 

Distance 

(ft)/Direction 

Northeast 

property 

adjacent 


Regulatory A release was reported and the LUST incident is Tank Size and Three 7,500-gallon 

Status still open (see LUST section below). 

Contents gasoline USTs 

Based on regulatory status and proximity to the site, this UST facility represents evidence of a REC in 


Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST). A review of the Illinois Environmental 

Protection Agency (IEPA) LUST incident database did not identify the site as a LUST facility. 




The EDR database report identified fourteen LUST sites within one half mile of the site. They 

are discussed as follows: 

Name Sandhu Petroleum, Inc. (active Phillips 66 gas Distance East Adjacent 

station) 

(ft)/Direction Property 

Address 645 North Independence Blvd., Romeoville Gradient Variable 

Regulatory Open Incident # 20041221, gasoline 

Status 

and contents and diesel 

As part of a recent investigation documented in a 2007 Site Investigation Completion Report (SICR) by ERS 

of Illinois, Inc. (see Appendix VII), groundwater had been impacted at the Phillips 66 property. In an attempt 

to determine the western extent of the contaminant plume, two, ten-foot deep monitoring wells (MW-9 and 

MW-10) were recently installed on the subject site near the eastern border, just north of the shopping center 

building (See Figure 3). Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for gasoline and diesel fuel indicator 

parameters (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes - BTEX, methyl tertiary-butyl ether - MTBE, and 

Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds - PNAs). PNAs were detected in the shallow soil samples but were below 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Tiered Approach to Cleanup Objectives Tier 1 Remediation 

Objectives (IEPA TACO Tier 1 ROs) for residential and industrial commercial properties. Several PNA 

constituents were detected in the on-site groundwater at concentrations that exceed the IEPA TACO Tier 1 

ROs for Class I groundwater. 

The SICR report determined that groundwater direction at the location of the monitoring wells was 

determined to be flowing to the south/southwest. 

The SICR report indicated that the concentrations of PNAs detected in the groundwater at Spartans’ Square 

“do not appear to be associated with releases of gasoline or diesel fuel that occurred at the Site [Phillips 66 

gas station]”. On this basis, ERS of Illinois, Inc. determined that no further investigation is necessary at 

Spartans’ Square. 

Ms. Shirlene South, the IEPA LUST project manager for the Phillips 66 incident, informed V3 that she did 

not concur with ERS’s conclusion and informed them that an additional investigation (which would include 

the installation of a third well on the shopping center property) is necessary to determine the western extent 

of the groundwater contamination. 

V3 also interviewed Mr. Phil Prassas Jr. (site owner), who did not have any additional information 

concerning the impact to the site as it relates to the Phillips 66 LUST incident. 

V3 submitted a FOIA request to the IEPA Bureau of Land to obtain a copy of the most recent 

documentation. The IEPA forwarded a response letter from the IEPA dated November of 2007, which 

stated that the SICR prepared by ERS was not approved and additional investigation is required. 

Based on regulatory status and known off-site groundwater impacts to the subject site, the LUST incident is 

a REC. 

Name Equilon Enterprises (active Shell gas station) Distance South adjacent 



Regulatory 

Status 

Open, site classification is high 

Incident # and 

contents 

20001858, gasoline 

Records obtained from the IEPA Bureau of Land (see Appendix VII) indicate that groundwater was impacted 

from the release. Groundwater at the Shell gas station was identified as flowing away from the subject site in a 

general easterly direction (northeast, east or southeast). Furthermore, soil and groundwater samples collected 

from the northern boundary of the gas station property (closest to the subject site) did not reveal evidence of 

contamination above cleanup standards. Based on this information, the release reported at this facility does 

not represent evidence of an REC in connection with the subject site. 

Name Clark Oil & Refining (Romeoville Laser) Distance Northeast 



adjacent 




Regulatory 

Status 

Open, site classification is high 

Incident # and 

contents 

941264, gasoline 

Records obtained from the IEPA Bureau of Land (see Appendix VII) indicate that groundwater was impacted 

from the release. Groundwater at the former Clark station property is shown as flowing to the south, potentially 

in the direction of the subject site. In addition, the extent of contamination plume has not been identified. 

Based on this information, the release reported at this property represents evidence of an REC in connection 

with the subject site. 

The eleven remaining listings are located greater than one-eighth of a mile from the site and 

not a concern based on distance. 

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). The subject property was not identified on the PCB 

Activity Database (PADS). 

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System 

(CERCLIS) and National Priorities List (NPL). Sites regulated under “Superfund” (or 

CERCLA) are identified on the CERCLIS. No CERCLIS sites were identified within one-half 

mile of the site. No NPL sites were identified within one mile of the site. 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). Facilities that generate a 

threshold volume of hazardous waste are regulated under Resource Conservation Recovery 

Act (RCRA) and listed in RCRIS. Sites that generate hazardous wastes are listed as a RCRA 

Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) or a Large Quantity Generators (LQGs). Sites that treat, 

store, or dispose (TSD) hazardous wastes, are also regulated under RCRA and are identified 

on the RCRIS. The site or any adjacent properties were not listed as a RCRA generator of 

hazardous waste. The site was not listed as a TSD facility. No TSD facilities were identified 

within one-half mile of the subject site. 

The following adjacent property was listed as a RCRA generator: 

Shell Oil Co. 

Distance South adjacent 

Name 


Address 1 Alexander Drive Gradient Variable 

RCRA 

Generator 

Status/ 

Regulatory 

Status 

Small Quantity Generator/No violations found TSDF 

Activities 

None reported 

Based on regulatory status, this RCRA generator site does not represent evidence of a REC in connection with 

the subject property. 

RCRA Corrective Action (CORRACTS). The site was not listed as a CORRACTS facility. No 

CORRACT facilities were listed within one mile of the subject site. 

IEPA Site Remediation Program (SRP). The site was not listed as a SRP facility. 




One site was identified as part of the voluntary SRP within one-half mile of the subject site as 

listed below: 

Name Mid-West Spring Manufacturing Co. Distance 600 feet, east 

(ft)/Direction 

Address 8 Greenwood Avenue, Romeoville Gradient Variable 

Regulatory 

Status 

No Further Remediation Letter issued on 

6/27/2000; Comprehensive 

Industrial/Commercial, no institutional controls, 

barriers, or worker caution areas 

Active 

No 

Based on regulatory status and gradient, this SRP site does not represent evidence of a REC in connection 

with the subject property. 

Solid Waste Facilities/Landfills (SWF/LF). The site was not listed as a SWF/LF facility. No 

SWF/LF sites were identified within one-half mile of the subject property. 

State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS). The site was not listed as a SHWS facility. No SHWS 

sites were identified within one-half mile of the subject property. 

EDR Historical Cleaners. The site was not listed as an historical dry cleaner’s facility. No 

historical cleaner facilities were identified within one-eight mile of the site. 

Institutional Controls (ICs) and Engineering Controls (ECs). The site was not listed as a IC or 

EC facility. No IC or EC facilities were identified within one-half mile of the site. 

State/Tribal IC/EC. The site was not listed as a State or Tribal IE or EC facility. No State or 

Tribal IC or EC facilities were identified within one-half mile of the subject site. 

State/Tribal-Brownfield Sites. The site was not listed as a State/Tribal Brownfield site. No 

State/Tribal Brownfield facilities were identified within one-half mile of the subject site. 

5.3 Local Records 

The following local, state, tribal, and/or federal agencies were contacted and questioned with 

regard to any environmental issues related to the site or adjoining properties. Copies of 

applicable data and phone conversations are provided in Appendix VII. 

• DuPage Township Assessor – The assessing records included descriptions of site 

improvements related to the expansion of the Jewel/Osco grocery store. The parcel 

number for the site is 12-02-34-101-016. Mr. John Randall, DuPage Township Assessor, 

indicated that he had no knowledge of potential environmental concerns associated with 

the subject site. 

• Will County Assessor – The Will County Assessor Office website was reviewed for the 

subject site. The website indicated the site is a commercial property. 




• Village of Romeoville Community Development Department – The property is zoned 

as D-D, Downtown District. Building department records were available from the mid- 

1980s until 2008 and contained permits for remodeling, signs, plumbing, and electrical. 

The building department records indicate various retail tenants were historically located at 

the site, including a barber shop, laundromat, pharmacy, grocery store, various 

restaurants, and clothing shops. The permit records for 5 Terrace Drive were not readily 

available from the Village of Romeoville. Mr. Prassas, Jr. indicated this address was 

formerly a video store. The space was recently remodeled for the intended use as a 

Mexican restaurant. However, the remodeling was never completed nor was the space 

occupied by the Mexican restaurant. 

• Village of Romeoville Fire Department – No fire department records were available for 

the site addresses within the shopping center; however, records of nearby addresses were 

provided. 

• Will County Health Department – The health department did not have any records on file 

for the site. 

5.4 Previous ESA and/or Site Investigation Reports 

No reports pertaining to the evaluation of environmental conditions at the site were provided to 

V3. 

5.5 Title Records 

The User provided a commitment for title insurance dated December 7, 2007. At the request 

of the User, V3 contracted Advanced Searches to perform a search of environmental liens and 

activity and land use limitations (AULs). The search document is provided in Appendix V and 

summarized below: 

Property Record Found Comment 

Current Title - Holder Yes 

Current owner is listed as: Glencoe National Bank Tr. L-428. 

The ownership name does not suggest an environmental 

concern. 

Leases No No leases were reported. 

Environmental Liens No No current or historic environmental liens were recorded 

Institutional Controls No No recorded institutional controls 

Engineering Controls No No recorded engineering controls 

This information does not suggest the potential for environmental impairment to the property. 

Therefore, no evidence of an REC was identified on the basis of these records. 

5.6 Historical Records Review 

5.6.1 Records Reviewed 




Multiple historical sources were reviewed to gain an understanding of the site history, 

including standard ASTM E1527-05 historical sources. Those sources that were both easily 

attainable and available within project constraints, and/or that were judged likely to be useful 

for the purposes of this study, are listed on the following table. Copies of these data are 

provided In Appendix VIII. 

Historical 

Document 

Aerial 

Photographs 

Fire 

Insurance 

Maps 

Property Tax 

Files 

Recorded 

Land Title 

Records 

Topographic 

Maps 

Local Street 

Directories 

Building 

Department 

Records 

Zoning/Land 

Use Records 

General 

Historical 

Data 

N/A-Not Applicable 

Reasonably 

Ascertainable/ 

Available 

Yes 

Reviewed Standard Historical Sources 

Likely to 

be Useful, 

Accurate 

or 

complete 

Yes 

Source/Date(s) 

Will/South Cook NRCS – 1939 

and 1961; EDR-, 1978, 1988, 

1998; Airphoto-2006 

Comment 

Limited in usefulness 

due to scale and 

resonance 

N/A N/A Requested from EDR No coverage available 

Yes Yes DuPage Township /1961-2008 Discussed in Section 5.3 

No 

Yes 

No 

Yes 

Requested from Village of 

Romeoville 

EDR; 1892, 1954, 1962, 1973, 

1980, 1993, 1998 

No N/A EDR 

Yes 

Yes 

N/A 

Yes 

Yes 

No 

5.6.2 Past Use of the Subject Site 

Village of Romeoville Community 

Development Department: 

Building permit records: Mid- 

1980s – 2008 

Village of Romeoville Community 

Development Department 

Historical Society, Library, 

website, etc. 

Not available, a 

Commitment for Title 

Insurance was provided 

and Advanced Searches 

conducted a search of 

liens and AULs – see 

Section 5.3 

Appendix VIII 

No historical directories 

available 

Discussed in Section 5.3 

Discussed in Section 5.3 

Not likely to be useful 

Based on review of the indicated source, historical uses of the site are identified below: 

Year(s) Property Use Reference Source 

No buildings are indicated on the site. The site appears as agricultural Aerial photos, topographic 

1939-1960 

cropland. . 

maps, and interviews 

The eastern portion of the Spartans’ Square shopping center building Topographic maps, aerial 

1961-1971 was constructed in the early 1960s and situated in the southeast portion photographs, building 

of the site. Mr. Prassas, Jr. mentioned that the Prassas family originally department records, and 




1971-2008 

built the shopping center. Various commercial and retail tenants, 

including a dry cleaner/laundromat have occupied space at the shopping 

center. A grocery store was historically the anchor tenant at the center. 

An addition was constructed to the western portion of the building in 

1971. In the mid-1980s, the far eastern portion of the shopping center 

was renovated. The former grocery store space has been unoccupied 

since 2004. The current tenants of the shopping center are listed in 

Section 3.1 

interviews 

Topographic maps, aerial 

photographs, building 

department records, 

interviews, site 

reconnaissance 

The reviewed historical information related to the site indicates the following: 

• The use of the site was agricultural cropland from at least 1939 through 1960. It is likely that 

herbicides/pesticides associated with agricultural use have been applied to the property 

during this time frame. As a result, some residual chemicals may be present in the near 

surface soils. No evidence of chemical mixing, bulk storage or misuse was evident during the 

course of this investigation. As such, the historical use of the site for crop cultivation and the 

possible use of herbicides/pesticides do not represent evidence of a REC. 

• Based on interviews with various local personnel and the current owner of the laundromat, 

the west side of the laundromat space was occupied by a dry cleaning operation sometime 

between the 1960s and the 1970s (see record of communications in Appendix IV). It was 

also reported that the space was later used as a drop off facility and that actual dry 

cleaning activities occurred offsite. Based on the nature of chemicals associated with a dry 

cleaning operation, the historical presence of the dry cleaners represents evidence of a 

REC. 

No significant data gaps were identified in the review of historical site use. 

5.6.3 Past Use of the Surrounding Properties 

Historical information associated with surrounding properties is summarized below: 

Year(s) Property Use Reference Source 

Adjacent Property to North 

No buildings are indicated on the property. The property Topographic maps and aerial 

1939-1973 

appears to be agricultural cropland 

photographs 

Phelps Avenue followed by various retail/commercial 

buildings. During the site visit, the following businesses were 


1973-2008 observed north of Phelps Avenue: Chase Bank, Romeoville 

photographs, site reconnaissance 

Medical Center, Terrace Liquors, Route 66 Plaza, and 

Romeoville Laser. 

Adjacent Property to South 

Farm buildings are indicated on the property. The property Topographic maps and aerial 

1939-1973 


photographs 

Alexander Circle followed by various retail/commercial 

buildings. During the site visit, the following businesses were 

1973-2008 observed south of Alexander Circle: Shell gas station, Lost 

Acre Lounge, The Finish Line car wash, and Hampton Park 

Place. 

Adjacent Property to East 

Farm buildings are indicated on the property. The property 

1939-1973 




Topographic maps and aerial 

photographs 




Independence Boulevard followed by various retail stores 

and vacant commercial buildings. During the site visit the 

following businesses were observed east of Independence 

1973-2008 

Boulevard: Nick’s Barbeque, Phillips 66 gas station, former 

Danny Boy’s restaurant - now vacant and Route 66 Auto 

Mart. 

Adjacent Property to West 

No buildings are indicated on the property. The property 

1939-1988 

appears to be agricultural cropland. 

Townhall Drive followed by various commercial buildings. 

During the site visit the following businesses were observed 

1939-1954 

west of Townhall Drive: Anderson Memorial Chapel, 

Romeoville Dental Center, and Harris Bank. 



Topographic maps and aerial 

photographs 



The following existing RECs were identified on the basis of historic use and/or operations on 

surrounding properties: 

• Romeoville Laser at 651 N. Independence Blvd. is located to the northeast. It was a 

former Clark gas station and a release was reported. The historical use of this adjacent 

property as a gas station represents evidence of a REC in connection with the subject 

site (see also Section 5.2 and 6.0). 

• A Phillips 66 gas station at 645 N. Independence Blvd is located to the east. It has 

been a gas station since at least 1973. A release was reported. The historical use of 

this adjacent property as a gas station represents evidence of a REC in connection with 

the subject site (see also Section 5.2 and 6.0). 

• A Shell gas station at 1 Alexander Circle is located to the south. It has been a gas 

station since at least 1973. A release was reported. However, it was determined that 

the release does not represent evidence of a REC in connection with the subject site 

(see also Section 5.2 and 6.0). 

No significant data gaps were noted with respect to historical adjacent property usage. 




6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS 

Ms. Heidi Radke of V3 conducted a visual evaluation of the subject property on January 8, 

2008. Ms. Margie Lathrop conducted an additional inspection of 5 Terrace Lane and 7 

Terrace Lane on January 15, 2008. The purpose of the field inspections was to observe the 

site for conditions that imply potential environmental impact. Such conditions might include 

signs of stressed vegetation, stained soil, uncontrolled dumping, the presence of underground 

storage tanks, or indications of a release of hazardous wastes and/or regulated substance(s). 

The field inspections included observations of adjoining properties from the site or surrounding 

roads. Ms. Radke were accompanied by Mr. Phil Prassas, Jr. from Prassas Company. Ms. 

Lathrop was accompanied by Ms. Diane Brzozowski, the owner of the laundromat. 

Photographic documentation of V3’s field inspection is provided in Appendix II. 

During the site visit, V3 conducted interviews with various individuals with specific knowledge 

of the property and its history. These individuals are identified in Section 6.13, and the 

information obtained during this process is incorporated into Sections 6.2 through 6.12. 

Interview notes and phone logs are provided in Appendix VII. 

6.1 Limiting Conditions Regarding Methodology 

No limiting conditions were encountered relative to the performance of site reconnaissance 

activities. 

6.2 Site Utilities 

The following utility services are present at the site: 

Electricity 

Natural Gas 

HVAC 

Fuel Oil 

Propane 

Water 

Sanitary 

ComEd 

Nicor Gas (separate connection for each tenant) 

Roof-mounted or interior units 

No 

No 



6.3 Raw Material Use and Storage 

A variety of raw materials were observed to be used and stored at the site. The following is a 

summary of these substances and observed storage procedures. 

Location 

ACE Hardware 

Material 

Various products for 

retail sale (i.e. latex 

paints, cleaners, oils, 

lawn chemicals) 

Approximate 

container sizes 

Several ounces to 

less than 55 

gallons 

Storage 

Conditions 

Tile floor or 

shelves 

Staining (if yes-REC 

or de minimis) 

ACE Hardware Petroleum products – One quart to 5 Flammables No 

No 




All tenants 

Mexican 

Restaurant 

Laundromat 

gasoline, lacquer thinner gallons cabinet in rear 

of store 

Housekeeping chemicals 

Metal shelves 


or tile/concrete 

5 gallons 

floor 

Paint and other 

remodeling-related 

chemicals 

Laundry detergents 


one gallon 

One gallon 

containers 

Shelves and 

concrete floor 

Tile/concrete 

floor 

No 

No 

No 

6.4 Generation, Storage and Disposal of Wastes 

Various wastes are generated and stored at the facility, prior to disposal. The following is a 

summary of these wastes and observed storage procedures. 

Location 

South of 

China 

King 

Buffet 

Material 

Cooking 

grease 

Approximate 

container sizes 

Waste dumpster 

Storage Conditions 

Outside over asphalt 

pavement, minor 

grease buildup 

around dumpster 

Staining (if yes-REC or de 

minimis) 

No 

Mr. Louie Higheaugh of ACE Hardware indicated the store performs oil changes of rental 

equipment inside the store. No floor staining was observed in this area. Mr. Higheaugh 

stated that a small quantity of used oil is generated and then dropped-off for recycling at a 

local vehicle oil change facility. No waste oil storage areas were observed on the day of the 

site inspection. Based on the small quantity of used oil generated and a lack of staining, the 

changing of oil at the store is not considered a REC. 

6.5 Indication of Solid Waste Disposal 

Location Type of Waste Observed conditions-surface type; 

staining observed 

REC – yes or no; or de 

minimis 

South of 

building 

South of 

Laundromat 

Solid waste; five 

dumpsters 

Fly-dumping – 

bathtub, wood 

debris 

Over asphalt pavement; no staining 

Over asphalt pavement; no staining 

No 

No 

6.6 Water and Wastewater 

6.6.1 Potable Water 

Discussed in Section 6.2. 

6.6.2 Process Water 

No process water is used at the site. 




6.6.3 Wastewater 

No wastewater other than sanitary (discussed in Section 6.2) is produced at the site. 

6.6.4 Stormwater 

V3’s site visit indicates stormwater runoff from the property flows into stormwater manholes 

located throughout the parking lot and pavement south of the building. No environmental 

concerns were identified. 

6.6.5 Drains and Sumps 

The following drains and sumps were observed at the site: 

Location Type Water observed? 

Building 

Parking 

lots and 

pavement 

south of 

building 

South of 

China 

King 

Buffet 

Floor drains 

throughout 

building 

(including 

bathrooms) 

Storm sewer 

manholes 

Sheens, odors or 

other evidence of 

concern? 

Discharge 

Point 

No No Sanitary sewer No 

Yes 

Grease trap No No 

No; observations limited 

Municipal 

storm sewer 

Connected to 

municipal 

sanitary sewer 

REC – Yes/No 

No 

No – grease 

trap cleaned 

out on a 

regular basis 

6.7 Underground (USTs) and Above-Ground (ASTs) Storage Tanks 

No indication of USTs was noted by V3 during the site visit. 

According to Mr. Phil Prassas, Jr., no historical ASTs or USTs were located on the site. Based 

on the records review presented in Section 5.0, no records of a UST were found for the site 

address. 

The following AST was observed at the site: 

Location 

South of 

ACE 

Hardware 

Capacity 

(gallons) 

Contents Status Secondary 

Containment 

1,000 Liquid In use Over concrete 

Propane 

pavement 

Staining – if yes REC or de minimis 

No 

6.8 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 

The following equipment that potentially contains PCBs was observed during V3’s site visit. 

Location Equipment PCB labeling Conditions Staining? If yes, REC 




Parking lot, 

northeast of 

building 

Parking lot, east 

of building 

South of former 

grocery store 

South of ACE 

Hardware 

East of ACE 

Hardware 

One pole-mounted 

transformer 

Four pole-mounted 

transformers 

Three polemounted 

transformers 


transformers 


transformers 

None observed 

None observed 

None observed 

None observed 

None observed 

No signs of a 

release 

No signs of a 

release 

No signs of a 

release 

No signs of a 

release 

No signs of a 

release 

or de minimis 

No staining on ground 

surface below units 









6.9 Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons 

No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on the property. 

6.10 Other Conditions of Concern 

Three metal platform lifts were observed behind 23 Terrace Lane and 21 Terrace Lane. Mr. 

Higheaugh of ACE Hardware stated that the store has used the lift behind 21 Terrace Lane 

and the lift is hydraulically operated. The construction details and condition of the lifts were 

not provided. There is a potential for petroleum impacts from the storage of oil below-ground. 

In addition, hydraulic oil historically contained PCBs. Therefore, the existence of belowground 

hydraulic lifts represents evidence of a REC. 

Several pavement cut-outs with exposed gravel were observed south of the building. Mr. Phil 

Prassas, Jr. indicated these cut-outs resulted from the repair of a water main break. 

6.11 Adjacent Properties 

Section 5.4.2 provides information relative to the historical use of land surrounding the site. 

Observations of the adjacent properties were made from the site property and from public 

thoroughfares. The following property uses were observed on the adjacent properties: 

North 

East 

South 

West 

Phelps Avenue followed by various retail/commercial properties (Chase Bank, Romeoville 

Medical Center, Terrace Liquors, Route 66 Plaza – Tuffy Automotive, Fat Ricky’s, State 

Farm, and Back to Basics Chiropractic), Romeoville Laser (former Clark gas station) 

Independence Boulevard followed by various retail stores and vacant commercial properties 

(Nick’s Barbeque, Phillips 66 gas station, former Danny Boy’s restaurant - now vacant, 

Route 66 Auto Mart) 

Alexander Circle followed by various retail/commercial properties (Shell gas station, Lost 

Acre Lounge, The Finish Line car wash, Hampton Park Place – multi-tenant commercial) 

Townhall Drive followed by various commercial properties (Anderson Memorial Chapel, 

Romeoville Dental Center, Harris Bank) 




The following adjacent properties are identified as RECs to the subject site, as mentioned 

previously in Section 5.0, due to the reported releases of petroleum products (LUST 

incidents): 

• Romeoville Laser at 651 N. Independence Blvd. (former Clark gas station) 

• Phillips 66 gas station at 645 N. Independence Blvd. 

6.12 Individuals Interviewed 

The following individuals were interviewed as part of this assessment. Notes pertaining to 

interviews and phone discussions are included in Appendix VII. Information obtained from 

these interviews has been included in this report. 

Title Name Company Documented Information 

The User Dawn Caldwell Village of Romeoville Questionnaire – Appendix IV 

Key Site 

Manager 

Current 

Occupant(s) 

Current 

Owner 

Past 

Occupant 

Phil Prassas, Jr. Prassas Company Report 

Harris Bank Glencoe- 

Northbrook N.A., as Trustee 

Under Trust Agreement 

Dated December 18, 1989 

and Known as Trust Number 

L-428 

Various retail stores 

N/A 

Interview with Phil Prassas, 

Jr. (see Section 3.1) 

Questionnaire – Appendix IV 

N/A Various retail stores See Section 5.6.2 

Past Owner Not identified N/A N/A 

Neighboring 

Property N/A 

Owner 

N/A-Not Applicable 

N/A – Not an abandoned 

property 

7.0 NON-SCOPE ASTM E1527 ITEMS 

Issues such as asbestos, radon, lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, wetlands, regulatory 

compliance, cultural and historic resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological 

resources, endangered species, indoor air quality and high voltage power lines are beyond 

the scope of ASTM E 1527. Such services are considered additional services and have not 

all been formally investigated in this assessment. 

No non-scope ASTM 1527 issues were addressed as part of this assessment. 




8.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS & CONCLUSIONS 

V3’s evaluation of all identified environmental concerns regarding the site is summarized in 

this section. This includes a discussion of the identified potential and recognized RECs. 

8.1 Identified Data Gaps 

Under the ASTM/AAI standards, if data gaps are identified during the ESA process, the EP 

must comment on their significance and whether such gaps affect the overall findings. Data 

gaps “are a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the standards and practices 

listed in the regulation despite good faith efforts by the “Environmental Professional (EP)” or 

The User to gather such information.” A data gap is significant if other information and/or 

professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the “data gap.” 

No significant data gaps were identified during the ESA process. 

8.2 Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions 

An historic recognized environmental condition (HREC) is an environmental condition which in 

the past would have been considered a recognized environmental condition, but which may or 

may not be considered a recognized environmental condition currently. 

No HRECs were identified. 

8.3 Recognized Environmental Conditions 

Recognized environmental conditions are defined by ASTM E1527-05 as “the presence or 

likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under 

conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of 

any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the 

ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous 

substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is 

not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human 

health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement 

action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined 

to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions.” (Italics denote terms with 

specific ASTM definitions). 

This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in 

connection with the subject property except for the following: 

• Three below-ground hydraulic lifts are located south of the building (behind 21 and 23 

Terrace Lane). 

• Historical on-site dry cleaning operations were reportedly performed at the laundromat 

at 7 Terrace Lane. 





Philips 66 Gas Stations has impacted the groundwater at the subject site. 


LUST incident at the former Clark Gas Station (northeast adjacent property) has the 

potential to impact the subject site. 




± 

Approximate 

Site Boundary 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 




SWC IL Route 53 and Phelps Avenue 



OF: 


07292 1 





Romeoville, IL 12/21/07 

1 

1 

NTS

Approximate 

Site Boundary 

Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 

± 

Romeoville Laser 

(Former Clark Gas Station) 

Phelps Avenue 

Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 


Terrace Lane 

Spartans' Square 

Shopping Center 

Independence Boulevard 

Phillips 66 

Gas Station 

Access Drive 


Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 

Asphalt Pavement 

Shell 

Gas 

Station 

Route 66 

Auto Mart 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 

Site Features Map 






OF: 


07292 2 





N/A 

12/21/07 

1 

1 

NTS

± 

Spartans' Square 

Shopping Center 

MW-9 

3 

23 

21 

15 

7 5 

625 

623 

621 

619 

617 

615 

MW-10 

Hydraulic Lifts 

Hydraulic Lifts 


LP Tank 

(above ground) 

Grease Trap 

(below ground) 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 

Spartans' Square Addresses Map 






OF: 

AirPhoto USA (2006) 

07292 3 





N/A 

01/10/08 

1 

1 

NTS






Re: 

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 


SWC Illinois Route 53 (Independence Blvd.) and Phelps Avenue 


Dear Ms. Caldwell: 

In accordance with our proposal dated January 24, 2008, and on behalf of the Village of 

Romeoville (CLIENT), V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd. (V3) conducted a Phase II Environmental 

Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) at the Spartans’ Square Shopping Center (“Site”) located at the 

southwest corner of IL Route 53 and Phelps Avenue in Romeoville, Illinois (Figure 1). 

The Phase II ESA was performed on January 28, 2008, to investigate the four recognized 

environmental conditions (RECs) identified by V3 in a Phase I Environmental Site 

Assessment (Phase I ESA) dated January 17, 2008. 

BACKGROUND 

The Site is located at the southwest corner of IL Route 53 and Phelps Avenue in Romeoville, 

Will County, Illinois (Figure 2). The Site is occupied by Spartans’ Square Shopping Center, 

which includes a large hardware store, 10 smaller commercial spaces and associated asphalt 

parking lot and landscaping. 

During V3’s Phase I ESA, the following evidence of RECs was identified: 

• Three below-ground hydraulic lifts are located south of the Site building (behind 21 and 

23 Terrace Lane). 

• Historical on-site dry cleaning operations were reportedly performed at the Mrs. Clean 

Laundromat at 7 Terrace Lane. 


Philips 66 Gas Station has apparently impacted the groundwater at the Site. 

• Based on regulatory status and their close proximity, the open LUST incident that was 

reported at the former Clark Gas Station (northeast adjacent property) has the potential 

to impact the Site. 

V3 COMPANIES OF ILLINOIS LTD. 7325 JANES AVENUE, WOODRIDGE, IL 60517 PH: 630.724.9200 FX: 630.724.9202 V3CO.COM 

 

 

CHICAGO DENVER PHOENIX




Page 2 

Initially, the purpose of this Phase II ESA was to assess whether the Site has been adversely 

impacted in an environmental sense by current and historical activities related to the four RECs 

above. 

Based on conversations V3 had recently with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

(IEPA), additional environmental investigation is being required of Phillips 66 to further evaluate 

the extent of impacted groundwater associated with this release. The work will be conducted by 

a consultant hired by Phillips 66. Therefore, the Client has requested that V3 not investigate 

this REC at this time. 

Additionally, V3 was informed by the Client that the Site owner would not allow access to 

investigate two other RECs (the hydraulic lifts and the northeast adjacent LUST incident). V3’s 

Phase II ESA was therefore limited to investigating the former dry cleaners at the space now 

occupied by Mrs. Clean Laundromat (the Laundromat). 

OBJECTIVES 

The objectives of the Phase II ESA are to assess whether soil and groundwater have been 

impacted as a result of reported historical on-site dry cleaning operations. 

SCOPE OF SERVICES 

The general tasks associated with the Phase II ESA included: site health and safety plan 

preparation, private utility location, soil sampling utilizing direct push technology, temporary 

monitoring well installation, laboratory chemical analysis of soil and groundwater samples, data 

analysis and interpretation, and report preparation. It should be noted that this was not a 

comprehensive site investigation designed to delineate potential soil and groundwater impacts. 

Field Investigation 

Mr. Jeff Paddock, Environmental Geologist with V3, coordinated and provided field oversight of 

the work. Paramount Environmental Services of Portage, Indiana, provided drilling services 

using a cart-mounted probe inside and a truck-mounted probe outside the Laundromat. Six soil 

borings were advanced inside the Laundromat and three soil borings were advanced in the 

parking lot directly south of the Laundromat, to a maximum depth of 18.5 feet bgs. Two of the 

borings advanced in the parking lot were converted into 1-inch diameter PVC temporary 

monitoring wells. Refer to Figure 3 (attached) for sampling locations and Attachment A for soil 

boring logs and temporary monitoring well construction details. 

Field Procedures 

The Laundromat is an active facility. V3 selected soil boring and well locations to sample the 

most likely areas expected to be impacted, based on our professional experience in 

investigating dry cleaning facilities. Some areas within the Laundromat were not accessible due 

to the presence of underground utilities or space limitations. Soil borings in these locations 

were advanced with a pneumatic jack hammer, where feasible. 

All borings were advanced using direct push sampling equipment and were collected 

continuously using new 2-inch diameter, 2 and 4-foot long clear plastic liners. Soil borings SM- 

E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\07292 Phase II FINAL 021808.doc




Page 3 

GP-01, SM-GP-02, SM-GP-03, and SM-GP-06 were advanced inside the main room of the 

Laundromat using a hand-cart mounted 5400 Geoprobe. SM-GP-04 and SM-GP-05 were 

advanced in the store room and mechanical room using a pneumatic jack hammer. SM-GP-07, 

SM-GP-08, and SM-GP-09 were in the parking lot adjacent to the back door with a truckmounted 

6600 DT Geoprobe. 

Temporary groundwater monitoring wells were installed to a depth of 16 feet bgs by casing off 

the boreholes and inserting 1-inch diameter PVC casing materials into the boreholes. A 5-foot 

screen was set in each well across the water bearing gravel unit, completed with solid PVC riser 

to the surface. The outer casing was removed after the PVC was inserted to the prescribed 

depth, allowing the borehole to collapse around the well casing. The wells were purged prior to 

sampling using a peristaltic pump. Groundwater samples were collected using a peristaltic 

pump and were preserved with hydrochloric acid. Refer to Attachment A of this report for 

monitoring well construction details. 

Field Observations 

Soils were classified by Mr. Paddock and screened for volatile organic vapors utilizing a 

portable photoionization detector (PID). Field activities were performed using V3 standard 

operating procedures (refer to Attachment B of this report). 

Boring locations were observed to be paved with concrete or asphalt and were underlain with 

approximately 6-12 inches of mixed sand and gravel fill (see boring logs in Attachment A). The 

fill material was underlain by light gray and brown mottled silty clay with a trace of sand to a 

depth of 6-7 feet bgs. The silty clay became less cohesive and increasingly sandy with depth 

and was underlain by fractured, weathered dolomite cobbles. Well-rounded, poorly-sorted 

coarse sand was observed at 7.5-10 feet bgs and was underlain by fractured dolomite cobbles 

interbedded with well rounded, poorly sorted coarse dolomite gravel to a depth of 18.5 feet bgs 

or the terminus of the boring. 

Refusal was encountered in all of the soil borings advanced within the Laundromat at 6-7 feet 

bgs due to the presence of dolomite cobbles. No odors or staining were noted in any of the 

borings advanced. PID readings slightly above background were observed at varying depths in 

SM-GP-03, SM-GP-07 and SM-GP-08. 

Groundwater was encountered at 12 feet bgs. Recharge was immediate in both temporary 

monitoring wells and the wells were could not be pumped dry. No evidence of odors or sheen 

was noted in the groundwater samples. 

Laboratory Analytical Program 

Soil and groundwater samples were submitted for chemical analysis to First Environmental 

Laboratories of Naperville, Illinois, a NELAC accredited laboratory. A total of ten soil samples 

and two groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs. 

Analytical results were compared to Tier 1 soil and groundwater remediation objectives (ROs) 

for residential and industrial/commercial properties, specified at 35 IAC, Part 742 Tiered 

Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO). Refer to Tables 1 and 2 (attached) for soil 





Page 4 

and groundwater analytical results. Laboratory reports and chains of custody documents are 

provided in Attachment C. 

Soil Analytical Results 

The dry cleaning solvent tetrachloroethene (PCE) was detected in nine of the ten soil 

samples submitted to laboratory for chemical analysis (Table 1). However, only two soil 

samples [SM-GP-07(10-12) or SM-GP-08 (8-10)] exceeded residential or 

industrial/commercial ROs (Table 1). 

Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected in one of the soil samples but below the RO. No other 

VOC constituents were detected above laboratory detection limits in any of the soil samples 

analyzed. 

Groundwater Analytical Results 

PCE was detected in the groundwater samples collected from temporary monitoring wells 

SM-GP-07 and SM-GP-08 at concentrations exceeding the Class I and Class II groundwater 

ROs (Table 2). 

No other VOC constituents were detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater 

samples collected from the temporary monitoring wells. 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

Based on information obtained during the Phase II ESA, V3 presents the following findings 

and conclusions: 

• PCE was detected in several soil and groundwater samples. The presence of PCE in 

the subsurface indicates that dry cleaning operations were historically performed in 

what is now the Mrs. Clean Laundromat tenant space. 

• Additional investigation is needed to determine specific contaminant source areas and 

to delineate the vertical and horizontal extents of the PCE impacts. These data will be 

useful in evaluating remedial alternatives and costs. 

• Additional investigation will be required to determine whether the adjacent LUST 

incidents and on-site hydraulic lifts have impacted the Site. 





Page 5 

CLOSING 

We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with this project and are available at your 

convenience to further discuss the contents of this report. Please contact us should you have 

any questions, concerns, or additional needs. 

Sincerely, 


Jeff Paddock 

Environmental Geologist 

Craig A. McCammack, P.G. 

Senior Project Manager 

Enclosures: 

Figure 1 – Site Vicinity Map 

Figure 2 – Site Features Map 

Figure 3 – Site Boring/Monitoring Well Location Map 

Table 1 – Soil Analytical Results - VOCs 

Table 2 – Groundwater Analytical Results - VOCs 

Attachment A – Soil Boring & Monitoring Well Construction Logs 

Attachment B – V3 Field Investigation SOPs 

Attachment C – Laboratory Analytical 


FIIGURES

± 

Approximate 

Site Boundary 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 







OF: 


07292 1 





Romeoville, IL 2/2/2008 

1 

1 

NTS

± 

Approximate 

Site Boundary 

Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 

Romeoville Laser 

(Former Clark Gas Station) 

Phelps Avenue 

Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 


Terrace Lane 

Mrs. Clean 

Laundromat 


Phillips 66 

Gas Station 

Access Drive 


Various 

Retail & 

Commercial 

Businesses 

Asphalt Pavement 

Shell 

Gas 

Station 

Route 66 

Auto Mart 

V3 Companies 



630.724.9200 phone 

630.724.9202 fax 

www.v3co.com 

TITLE: 

Site Features Map 






OF: 


07292 2 





N/A 2/2/2008 

1 

1 

NTS

...\Figure 3_Boring Locations.dgn 1/30/2008 3:26:49 PM

TABLES

TABLE 1 - SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS (VOCs) 




Residential 



Industrial- 

Commercial 




Soils 

Soil Component of the 

Groundwater Ingestion 

Exposure Route Values 

1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 1/28/08 

SM-GP-01 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-02 

(2-4) 

SM-GP-03 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-03 

(6-7) 

SM-GP-04 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-05 

(0-2) 

SM-GP-05 

(2-4) 

SM-GP-07 

(10-12) 

SM-GP-08 

(8-10) 

SM-GP-09 

(0-2) 

Chemical Name 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 


Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

Ingestion 

(mg/kg) 

Inhalation 

(mg/kg) 

0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 6-7 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 10-12 ft 8-10 ft 0-2 ft 

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 

Acetone ---- g 100000 d ---- g 100000 d 70,000 b 100000 d 25 b 25 *

TABLE 2 - GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS (VOCS) 




January 28, 2008 January 28, 2008 

Groundwater Remediation 

Objective 

SM-GP-07-GW 

Chemical Name Class I (mg/L) Class II (mg/L) mg/kg mg/kg 


Acetone 6.3 6.3

ATTACHMENT A 

SOIL BORING & MONITORING WELL 

CONSTRUCTION LOGS

10173 

V3 Boring Log Report 

Boring Name: SM-GP-01 

Station Type: soil sampling 

Spartans' Square *07292 Jeff Paddock 

1053173.00 1815887.00 

915 1020 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

6.75 

615 

State Plane (Illinois East), USFeet 

0 

Located between washer and 

dryers, approximately 30' from 

southern wall 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Hand Cart 6.75 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

Depth (ft) PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

PP (tsf) % Recovery 

Lithologic Description 


Observations 

Samples 

0 

Concrete- - 3 inches------ 

0 

80 

Fill- brown- sand and gravel------ 

No odor or visual 

SM-GP-01(0-2) 

2 

4 

0 

1 

80 

CL (Lean Clay)- light brown and gray-7.5 5/8 silty clay with little to some sand and 

gravel-low plasticity-medium cons.-high cohesion-moist--brown mottling with rust 

Becomes less cohesive and 

less plastic with depth. 

Becomes sandier with depth. 


0 

2 

10 

6 

0 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- f ractured weathered dolomite----moist-poorly sorted- 


- - Ref usal at 6.75 f eet------ 

8 

10 

12 

END OF BORING (FT): 6.75

10185 





1053169.00 1815883.00 


7 

615 



southern wall 

1110 1200 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

0 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Hand Cart 7 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 


0 

80 



2 

0 

2 

80 

SM-GP-02(2-4) 

4 







0 

0.5 

70 

6 

0 




8 

10 

12 

END OF BORING (FT): 7

10193 





1053162.00 1815872.00 


7 

615 



southern wall 

820 900 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

0 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 


Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 


6.6 

70 



SM-GP-03(0-2) 

2 

0 

1.5 

70 

4 







0 

1.5 

60 

6 

0 

60 



SM-GP-03(6-7) 


8 

10 

12 


10201 





6 

Storage Room 

1053158.00 1815864.00 


615 

1000 1105 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

0 

Paramount 

N/A 

Hand Auger 6 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 


0.4 

100 



SM-GP-04(0-2) 

2 

4 

0 

3 

100 







0.4 

1 

100 

0 



6 

- - Refusal at 6.5 feet------ 

8 

10 

12 


10209 





6 

Mechanical Room 

1053155.00 1815855.00 


615 

1300 1400 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

0 

Paramount 

N/A 

Hand Auger 6 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 


0 

100 



SM-GP-05(0-2) 

2 

0 

1 

100 

SM-GP-05(2-4) 

4 

0 

1 







100 

6 

0 




8 

10 

12 


10217 





7 

Rear Hallway 

1053160.00 1815861.00 


615 

1400 1500 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 0 

0 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 


Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 


0 

100 



2 

0 

1.5 

100 

4 







0 

1.5 

100 

6 

0 




8 

10 

12 


10225 





5' to the west of the backdoor 

1053160.00 1815844.00 


615 

1600 1630 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

0 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 12 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 




Observations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

100 



SM-GP-09(0-2) 

2 

0 

1.5 

100 

4 

0 

1.5 

100 







6 

0 

100 

8 



1.6 

100 

10 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown - well-rounded coarse sand-----poorly sorted- 


0 

100 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- well-rounded coarse gravel interbedded with f ractured 

dolomite-----poorly sorted- 


12 

END OF BORING (FT):

10233 



Station Type: soil sampling/temp well 


5' to the east of the backdoor 

1053169.00 1815843.00 


615 

1520 1540 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

Depth (ft PID (ppm PP (tsf ) 

% Recovery 

Well 

Recove Well 



Observations 

Samples Samples 

0 

0 

50 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

4 

0 

0 

1 

1 

50 

100 

CL (Lean Clay)- light brown and gray-7.5 5/8 silty clay with little to some sand 

and gravel-low plasticity-medium cons.-high cohesion-moist--brown mottling 

with rust 

Becomes less cohesive 

and less plastic with 

depth. Becomes sandier 

with depth. No odor or 

visual 

6 

0 

1 

100 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- f ractured weathered 

dolomite----moist-poorly sorted- 


8 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- well-rounded coarse sand-----poorly 

sorted- 


4.5 

100 

10 

4.5 

100 

SM-GP-07(10-12) 

12 

0 

100 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- well-rounded coarse gravel interbedded 

with f ractured dolomite----wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


14 

0 

100 

16 

18 

END OF BORING (FT):

10247 



Station Type: soil sampling/temp well 


18.5 

15' to the south of the backdoor 

1053166.00 1815831.00 


615 

1540 1600 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 18.5 2 Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

N/A 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

Depth (ft PID (ppm PP (tsf ) 

% Recovery 

Well 

Recove Well 



Observations 

Samples Samples 

0 

0 

20 

Asphalt- - ------ 

Fill- brown- sand and gravel----moist-- 


2 

0 

4 

- - No Recovery------ 


0 

6 

2 

50 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- f ractured weathered 



8 

4.1 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- well-rounded coarse sand----moist-poorly 

sorted- 


SM-GP-08(8-10) 

10 

0 

100 

12 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray- f ractured 

dolomite----wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


0 

100 

14 

0 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- coarse sand----wet/saturated-poorly 

sorted- 


16 

0 

100 


with f ractured dolomite----wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


18 



ATTACHMENT B 

V3 FIELD INVESTIGATION SOPS

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROTOCOL 

Laboratory Analysis, Sample Custody, Shipment and Transfer Of Custody 

Pursuant to 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 740.415(d)(6), all quantitative analyses 

of samples collected will be completed by an accredited laboratory in accordance with 

the requirements of 35 IAC 186. 

Procedures to ensure the custody and integrity of the samples begin at the time of 

sampling and continue through transport, sample receipt, preparation, analysis and 

storage, data generation and reporting, and sample disposal. Records concerning the 

custody and condition of the samples are maintained in field and laboratory records. 

V3 will maintain chain-of-custody records for all field and QC samples. A sample is 

defined as being under a person's custody if any of the following conditions exist: (1) it is 

in their possession, (2) it is in their view, after being in their possession, (3) it was in their 

possession and they locked it up or, (4) it is in a designated secure area. If samples 

need to be out of the person’s sight, the coolers containing the samples should be 

sealed with COC seals during that time and stored in a locked room or vehicle, with 

sufficient ice to maintain the temperature. 

All samples require a sampling label. Analytical results received from the laboratory shall 

be documented according to the sample designator (number, location, etc.) which is 

indicated on the sampling jar by the sampler. Therefore, such designators shall be as 

meaningful and helpful as possible and standard designators shall be used when 

possible. 

All samples will be uniquely identified, labeled, and documented in the field at the time of 

collection. Samples collected in the field will be transported to the laboratory site as 

expeditiously as possible. The samples will be packed in ice to keep them cool during 

collection and transportation in order to maintain the temperature of the samples at 4°C 

± 2°C. If the temperature of the samples upon receipt exceeds the temperature 

requirements, the exceedance will be documented in laboratory records. 

Chain-of-Custody 

Proper sample chain-of-custody (COC) procedures are crucial to ensuring the quality 

and validity of data obtained through field and laboratory analyses. Protocol guidance is 

in accordance with ASTM D 4840-99 (Reapproved 2004): “Standard Guide for Sample 

Chain-of-Custody Procedures”. V3 field personnel are responsible for ensuring that 

COC procedures are followed. Field personnel will maintain custody of all samples until 

they are relinquished to another custodian, the laboratory, or to the freight shipper. All 

samples must be catalogued on a laboratory-supplied COC form using sample 

identification codes. Both sample labels and COC forms should be filled out with all 

pertinent information. COC forms should correspond exactly with the samples included 

in the shipment. 

An indelible ink, paint, or crayon should be used to enter information on the COC. The 

date and time of collection will be recorded on the form, as well as the number of each 

type of sample, the method of preservation, and the type of analysis. COC forms should 

include the project number and laboratory quote number, as applicable. This form also 

documents unusual conditions, which might be meaningful to the lab. For example, if a 

E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Attachments\SOPs\Chain-of- 

Custody.doc

sample is possibly hot, this should be noted on the COC, to alert lab personnel in 

handling the sample. COC forms are included in the appendices of reports, and 

therefore shall have as professional an appearance as possible. 

Samples will be packaged and transported in a manner that maintains the integrity of the 

sample and permits the analysis to be performed within the prescribed holding time. 

Prior to shipment, each sample container will be inspected for a label with the proper 

sample identification code. 

Samples will be either hand-delivered or shipped via overnight mail to the laboratory, or 

picked-up by a laboratory representative. The COC forms will be sealed in a plastic bag 

and transported inside the sample cooler. In addition, any shipping receipts will be 

incorporated into the COC documentation. Samples will be packed in the cooler using 

bubble-wrap packing materials. Any samples suspected of being highly contaminated 

will additionally be sealed in Ziploc ® -type bag. The cooler will be taped closed using 

custody seals provided by the laboratory to prevent tampering during transport. Upon 

relinquishing the sample cooler, V3 field personnel will sign custody of the samples over 

with the time and date at the bottom of the COC form. V3 will retain one copy of the 

COC documentation and the laboratory will retain a second copy. 

COC labels and forms provide immediate and necessary information for the processing 

of samples by the laboratory, and establish historic documentation of the sampling 

endeavor and tracking of samples, enabling defense of analytical data in a court of law. 

The COC form serves as a link to the information provided on the sample labels, and 

gives the lab overall information on the sample shipment (number of samples sent, 

number of sampling containers, date, time, and other pertinent information). If 

discrepancies are noted, these can be resolved early, when memories are still clear. 

Visual observations or specific data on sampling locations or intervals may also be 

helpful in future review of data. 

E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Attachments\SOPs\Chain-of- 

Custody.doc

DECONTAMINATION ACTIVITIES PROTOCOL 

Decontamination procedures will be employed to prevent cross contamination during the 

collection of samples. Equipment that will be used to sample soils, surface water and 

groundwater (i.e., split spoons, bailers, water level indicators, and the like) will be 

decontaminated prior to use by using the following procedures: 

• Scrub the equipment with a brush and a Liquinox® solution, 

• Rinse the equipment once with distilled water, 

• Air dry the equipment, and 

• Wrap the equipment in plastic while not being used. 

New disposable sampling gloves will be donned each time a sample is collected and 

during the handling of sampling equipment. Soil probe equipment will be washed with a 

Liquinox® wash and a distilled water rinse, or will be steam cleaned prior to each use. 

In addition, new, unused polybutyrate liners will be used in the macro core sampler prior 

to sample collection. 

E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Attachments\SOPs\Decontamination Activities 

Protocol.doc

DIRECT PUSH DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING 

PROTOCOL 

Soil samples will be collected at continuous intervals using a 4-foot or 5-foot macro core 

with a polybutyrate lining to the terminal depth of each soil probe. New disposable 

sampling gloves will be donned for each sample collected and during handling of sampling 

equipment. A photoionization detector (PID) will be used to monitor worker air quality at 

all sampling locations and screen soils for possible contaminants using the headspace 

technique. The PID will be equipped with a 10.2 electron volt lamp, unless otherwise 

specified, and calibrated daily to a 100 parts per million (ppm) isobutylene to air standard. 

The headspace technique involves placing a representative portion of each sample in a 

Ziploc® quart-sized bag, agitating the sample, and sealing the bag. After sealing the bag, 

the sample is allowed to warm for ten minutes. The probe of the PID is then inserted 

through the bag and the maximum reading over a 15-second period is recorded in the field 

book. 

Soil samples that are collected for laboratory analysis will be placed in appropriate sample 

containers in order of decreasing volatility. For each recovered soil sample, samples for 

possible VOC analysis will be immediately collected directly from the recovered sample, in 

accordance with USEPA SW-846 Method 5035/8260. Laboratory provided pre-weighed 

vials containing the correct amount of preservatives will be used (10 ml of methanol per 

vial and a 20% solution of sodium bisulfate (1 gram of sodium bisulfate to 5 ml of water). 

All samples collected for VOCs will be obtained directly from the recovered sampler at the 

specified sample interval using a disposable plastic pre-measured 5-gram syringe barrel 

provided by the laboratory. The barrel will be driven into the soil surface to remove the 

soil without exposure to air. The soil will then be extruded into one 40-ml vial preserved 

with methanol. The threads of the sample vial should be cleaned prior to capping. This 

process will be repeated until two 40-ml vials preserved with sodium bisulfate are also 

filled with 5-grams of soil each. One four ounce jar or smaller will then be filled with soil 

for dry weight analysis. The samples will be immediately capped, labeled, and placed on 

ice. For all additional analysis, the remaining portion of the recovered sample from the 

specified sample interval will be placed into appropriate laboratory specified jars, labeled 

with the sample name, sample location, sample depth (if appropriate), date, time, 

preservative (if appropriate), and name of sampler. All samples will be immediately placed 

in a cooler filled with ice. 

Following completion of drilling and soil sampling, soil cuttings with gross impacts will be 

containerized in clean Department of Transportation (DOT) 17-H rated 55-gallon drums, 

unless otherwise indicated and the boring will be backfilled with bentonite. 

A V3 geologist or engineer will log the subsurface conditions encountered using the 

Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM Method D2488), with color descriptions 

made using a Munsell Color Chart. Additional information that will be documented 

includes: 





E:\2007\07292\Reports\Natural Resources\Environ\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Attachments\SOPs\direct push drilling and soil 

sampling.doc





• Refusal 

Disposable sampling equipment will be used to the extent possible; however, all reusable 

equipment that may directly or indirectly contact samples will be decontaminated prior to 

each use. 

The direct push sampling technique can also be used to collect groundwater samples, by 

driving a temporary vertically slotted screen to the groundwater sampling interval. The 

groundwater is then collected by inserting Teflon tubing to the end of the screen and 

attaching the upper end to a peristaltic pump. The water is purged and allowed to 

recharge, if necessary. Temperature, pH and specific conductivity or TDS will be 

measured after each well volume is removed. Development will continue until these 

parameters have stabilized within the following criteria for three consecutive readings 

within + 10 % of previous readings for temperature and TDS, + 0.1 unit for pH, and +3% 

for specific conductance. If these criteria have not been attained after 2 hours, 

development activities will be suspended, the well will be considered “developed” and 

water samples will be collected. The water is then immediately transferred into 

appropriate sampling containers and placed on ice until it can be analyzed.

ATTACHMENT C 

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

BEACON Report No. 2096 

PASSIVE SOIL-GAS SURVEY 

DRY CLEANER 


Prepared for 

V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd. 



by 

Beacon Environmental Services, Inc. 

323 Williams Street 

Suite D 

Bel Air, MD 21014 

August 27, 2008

Applying Results from Soil-Gas Surveys 

The utility of soil-gas surveys is directly proportional to their accuracy in reflecting and 

representing changes in the subsurface concentrations of source compounds. Passive soil-gas 

survey results are the mass collected from the vapor-phase emanating from the source. The 

vapor-phase is merely a fractional trace of the source, so, as a matter of convenience, the units 

used in reporting detection values from passive soil-gas surveys are smaller than those employed 

for source-compound concentrations. 

The critical fact is that, whatever the relative concentrations of source and associated soil gas, 

best results are realized when the ratio of soil-gas measurements to actual subsurface 

concentrations remains as close to constant as the real world permits. It is the reliability and 

consistency of this ratio, not the particular units of mass (e.g., nanograms) that determine 

usefulness. Thus, BEACON emphasizes the necessity of conducting — at minimum — followon 

intrusive sampling at one or two points that show relatively high soil-gas measurements to 

obtain corresponding concentrations of soil and groundwater contaminants. These correspondent 

values furnish the basis for approximating the required ratio. Once that ratio is established, it can 

be used in conjunction with the soil-gas measurements (regardless of the units adopted) to 

estimate subsurface contaminant concentrations across the survey field. It is important to keep in 

mind, however, that specific conditions at individual sample points, including soil porosity and 

permeability, depth to contamination, and perched ground water, can have significant impact on 

soil-gas measurements at those locations. 

When passive soil-gas surveys are handled in this way, the data provide information that can 

yield substantial savings in drilling costs and in time. They furnish, among other things, a 

checklist of compounds expected at each survey location and help to determine how and where 

drilling budgets can most effectively be spent.

BEACON Report Number: 2096 

Passive Soil-Gas Survey 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL 

This Passive Soil-Gas Survey Report has been prepared for V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd. (V3) by 

Beacon Environmental Services, Inc. (BEACON). BEACON's principal technical contacts at V3 for this 

project have been Ms. Carmen Yung and Mr. Jeff Paddock. 

1. Objectives 

Soil-gas samples were collected to determine the presence, identity, and relative strength of 

targeted contaminants in soil and/or ground water at the Dry Cleaner site. Survey results will be 

used to identify source areas and delineate the lateral extent of contamination. 

2. Target Compounds 

This survey targeted the 40 compounds listed in Table 1, which supplies the resulting laboratory 

data in nanograms (ng) of specific compound per cartridge. 

3. Survey Description 

No. of Field Samples: 27 

No. of Duplicate Field Samples: 1 

No. of Trip Blanks: 1 

Total No. of Samples: 28 

Field sample locations are shown on Figure 1. 

4. Field Work 

V3 was provided a BESURE Sample Collection Kit with the equipment needed to conduct a 27- 

point passive soil-gas survey. Samplers were deployed on July 22 and 23, 2008, and were 

retrieved on July 28, 2008. Attachment 1 describes the field procedures used. Individual 

deployment and retrieval times will be found in the Field Deployment Report (Attachment 2).

MW-9 

Asphalt Parking Lot 

Sanitary Sewer 

SM-GP-18 

Watermain 

SG-11 

SM-GP-17 

SM-GP-15 

Overhang 

SM-GP-16 

SG-12 

MW-10 


Chinese 

Buffet 

SG-05 

Mrs 

Clean 

SM-GP-01 

SG-06 

Vacant 

SM-GP-02 

Subway/ 

Multi- 

Tenant 

Floor Drain 

SG-02 

SG-07 

SG-27 

SM-GP-03 

Floor Drain 

SG-26 

SG-13 

SG-10SG-09 

SG-25 

SG-08 

Floor Drain 


SM-GP-05SG-03 

SG-01 SG-04 SG-14 

Floor Drain 

SG-19 SG-18 

SG-22SM-GP-09 

SM-GP-07 

SM-GP-08 

SG-20 

Grass 

Watermain 


SG-23 

SG-21 

SG-24 

SG-16 



SG-15 

SG-17 

Grass 

Watermain 


LEGEND 

SG-08 

PASSIVE SOIL-GAS SAMPLE LOCATION 

V3 SOIL BORING 

SM-GP-01 

V3 SOIL BORING/ 

SM-GP-09 TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL 

MW-10 

ERS PERMANENT MONITORING WELL/ 

EAST ADJACENT LUST 

Scale in Feet 

Figure 1 


Sample Locations 

323 Williams Street, Suite D, Bel Air, MD, 800-878-5510 

Beacon Project No. 2096, August 2008 

0 

30 

60 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL

BEACON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 


Dry Cleaner 


5. Analysis and Reporting Dates 

BEACON's laboratory received 28 samples for analysis on July 29, 2008. Adsorbent cartridges 

from the passive samplers were thermally desorbed, then analyzed using gas 

chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) equipment, in accordance with EPA Method 8260B 

(Modified), as described in Attachment 3. BEACON's laboratory analyzed each cartridge for the 

targeted compounds; analyses were completed on July 31, 2008. Following a laboratory review, 

results were provided to V3 on August 4, 2008. On August 25, 2008, V3 authorized BEACON to 

issue the final report. 

6. Report Notes and Quality Assurance/Quality Control Factors 

Table 1 provides survey results in nanograms per cartridge by sample-point number and 

compound name. The quantitation levels represent values above which quantitative laboratory 

results can be achieved within specified limits of precision and with a high degree of confidence. 

The quantitation level for each compound, therefore, provides a reliable basis for comparing the 

relative strength of any detection of that compound. 

Data Compatibility. It is important to note that when sample locations are covered with or near 

the edge of an artificial surface (e.g., asphalt or concrete), the concentrations of compounds in 

soil gas are often significantly higher than the concentrations would be if the surfacing were not 

present. Thus, a reading taken below or near an impermeable surface is much higher than it 

would be in the absence of such a cap. Therefore, the sample location conditions should be 

evaluated when comparing results between locations. 

The Chain-of-Custody form, which was shipped with the samples for this survey, is supplied as 

Attachment 4. 

Laboratory QA/QC procedures included standards, surrogates, and blanks appropriate to EPA 

Method 8260 (Modified). Field work, analyses, and reporting were done in accordance with 

BEACON's Quality Assurance Program Plan. 

QA/QC Contaminant Corrections. Following EPA guidelines, laboratory data are not 

corrected for method blank or trip blank contamination values; any contamination detected on 

QA/QC samples is reported in Table 1. 

Laboratory method blanks are run each day with project samples to identify contamination 

present in the laboratory. If contamination is detected on a method blank, measurements of 

identical compounds on samples analyzed the same day are considered to be suspect and are

BEACON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 


Dry Cleaner 


flagged in the laboratory report. The laboratory method blank analyzed in connection with the 

present samples revealed no contamination. 

The trip blank is a sampling cartridge prepared, transported, and analyzed with other samples but 

intentionally not exposed. Any target compounds identified on the trip blanks are reported in the 

laboratory data. The analysis of the trip blank (labeled Trip-1 in Table 1) reported none of the 

targeted compounds, indicating that the survey site itself is the source of detected contamination. 

Duplicates. BEACON’s passive soil-gas samplers are prepared with two sets of cartridges for 

subsequent duplicate or confirmatory sample analysis. At V3’s request, duplicate analysis was 

performed for sample SG-09, designated SG-09 D. Because of finite differences between the 

cartridges, and the random nature of diffusive particle movement, comparisons between 

duplicates and primary samples should be made on a qualitative basis, as quantitative results may 

be subject to random distortions. However, when comparing quantitative results, a duplicate 

correspondence should be considered when the relative percent difference (RPD) between the two 

samples is less than or equal to 100%. Also, for the purpose of calculating correspondences, all 

non-detections should be assigned, as a baseline value, the quantitation level for the specific 

contaminant. Based on these assumptions, a 100% correlation was found between the duplicate 

sample and its base sample. 

Survey findings are relative exclusively to this project and should not routinely be compared 

with results of other BEACON Surveys. To establish a relationship between reported soil-gas 

measurements and actual subsurface contaminant concentrations, which will indicate those 

detections representing significant subsurface contamination, BEACON recommends the 

guidelines on the inside front cover of this report. 

Figures 2-1 and 3-1 show the distribution of Tetrachloroethene and Total Petroleum 

Hydrocarbons (TPH) in the C 5 -C 9 range, respectively, across the entire survey area. Figures 2-2 

and 3-2 show the distribution of the same compounds, respectively, but focus only on areas 

within the survey area, as requested by V3. 

The following Attachments are included: 

-1- Field Procedures 

-2- Field Deployment Report 

-3- Laboratory Procedures 

-4- Chain-of-Custody Form

Table 1 


323 Williams Street, Ste. D 


Analysis by EPA Method 8260B (Modified) 

Client Sample ID: Meth_Bl Trip-1 SG-01 SG-02 SG-03 SG-04 

Project Number: 2096 2096 2096 2096 2096 2096 

Lab File ID: 08073003 08073026 08073027 08073028 08073029 08073030 

Received Date: 7/29/2008 7/29/2008 7/29/2008 7/29/2008 7/29/2008 

Analysis Date: 7/30/2008 7/30/2008 7/30/2008 7/30/2008 7/30/2008 7/31/2008 

Analysis Time: 10:40 22:17 22:48 23:18 23:48 12:18 

Units: ng ng ng ng ng ng 

COMPOUNDS 

Vinyl Chloride

Table 1 





SG-05 SG-06 SG-07 SG-08 SG-09 SG-09 D 

Client Sample ID: 

TPH C 10 -C 14

Table 1 





SG-10 SG-11 SG-12 SG-13 SG-14 SG-15 


TPH C 10 -C 14

Table 1 





SG-16 SG-17 SG-18 SG-19 Meth_Bl SG-20 


TPH C 10 -C 14

Table 1 





SG-21 SG-22 SG-23 SG-24 SG-25 SG-26 


TPH C 10 -C 14

Table 1 





Project Number: 

Lab File ID: 

Received Date: 

Analysis Date: 

Analysis Time: 

Units: 

COMPOUNDS 

Vinyl Chloride 

1,1-Dichloroethene 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 

Methyl-t-butyl ether 

1,1-Dichloroethane 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 

Chloroform 


1,2-Dichloroethane 


1,1-Dichloropropene 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

Benzene 


Trichloroethene 


Toluene 


1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 

Tetrachloroethene 

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 

Chlorobenzene 

Ethylbenzene 

p & m-Xylene 

Bromoform 

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 

o-Xylene 

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 

Isopropylbenzene 

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 



n-Butylbenzene 

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 

Naphthalene 

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 

TPH C 5 -C 9 

TPH C 10 -C 14 


SG-27 

2096 

08073112 

7/29/2008 

7/31/2008 

15:57 

ng 

MW-9 



SM-GP-18 

Watermain 

SG-11 

Area shown in 

greater detail 

in Figure 2-2 

SM-GP-17 

SM-GP-15 

Overhang 

SM-GP-16 

SG-12 

MW-10 


Chinese 

1,514 

SG-05 

Mrs 

Vacant 

Clean 

Buffet 

313 

SM-GP-01 

SG-06 

242 737 

SM-GP-02 

Floor Drain 

SG-02 SG-07 

55 SM-GP-03 

1,326 

Floor Drain 

SG-26 576 2,683 

SG-13 

2,214 

SG-10SG-09 

SG-27 

SG-25 

SG-08 

Floor Drain 

Floor Drain 

SM-GP-04 SM-GP-06 347 

7,274 

90 

SM-GP-05SG-03 

SG-01 SG-04 SG-14 

47 

SG-19 SG-18 

SG-22SM-GP-09 

SM-GP-07 

73 

SM-GP-08 

SG-20 

Subway/ 

Multi- 

Tenant 

Grass 

7,500 

7,000 

6,500 

6,000 

5,500 

5,000 

4,500 

4,000 

3,500 

3,000 

Watermain 


2,500 

2,000 

30 

SG-24 

SG-23 

SG-21 

SG-16 

1,500 

1,000 

500 



SG-15 

0 

Color Scale 

(nanograms) 

SG-17 

Grass 

Watermain 


LEGEND 

100 TETRACHLOROETHENE (nanograms) 

SG-08 



SM-GP-01 



MW-10 



Scale in Feet 

Figure 2-1 





0 

30 

60 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL

7,500 

7,000 

6,500 

6,000 

5,500 

1,514 

SG-05 

5,000 

4,500 

4,000 

3,500 

Mrs 

Clean 

Vacant 

3,000 

2,500 

2,000 

1,500 

1,000 

313 

SG-06 

SM-GP-01 

500 

0 

Color Scale 

(nanograms) 

242 

SG-02 

SM-GP-02 

737 

SG-07 

55 

SG-26 

1,326 

SG-13 

Floor Drain 

SG-25 

576 

SG-10 

2,683 

SM-GP-03 

SG-09 

2,214 

SG-08 

SM-GP-04 

SM-GP-06 

Floor Drain 

7,274 

SM-GP-05 

SG-01 

347 

SG-03 

90 

SG-14 

Floor Drain 

47 

SG-22 

SM-GP-09 

SG-04 

SM-GP-07SG-19 

SG-18 

73 

SM-GP-08 

SG-20 

LEGEND 

100 TETRACHLOROETHENE (nanograms) 

SG-08 



SM-GP-01 



MW-10 



Scale in Feet 

Figure 2-2 





0 

10 

20 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL

MW-9 



SM-GP-18 

11,643 

SG-11 

Watermain 

SM-GP-17 

Area shown in 

greater detail 

in Figure 3-2 

Chinese 

Buffet 

SM-GP-15 

Overhang 

SG-05 

Mrs 

Clean 

SM-GP-01 

SG-06 

Vacant 

SM-GP-02 

SM-GP-16 

Subway/ 

Multi- 

Tenant 

6,402 

SG-12 

MW-10 


150,000 

Floor Drain 

4,077 

SG-27 

SG-02 SG-07 

SM-GP-03 

5,454 

SG-26 

11,421 

SG-13 Floor Drain 

SG-10SG-09 

SG-25 

SG-08 

Floor Drain 

Floor Drain 


149,146 

SM-GP-05SG-03 

SG-01 SG-04 SG-14 

4,367 

10,854 

SG-19 SG-18 

SG-22SM-GP-09 

SM-GP-07 

9,660 

SM-GP-08 

SG-20 

Grass 

140,000 

130,000 

120,000 

110,000 

100,000 

90,000 

80,000 

70,000 

60,000 

8,457 

SG-24 

3,746 

SG-23 

Watermain 

SG-21 

SG-16 


50,000 

40,000 

30,000 

20,000 

10,000 



SG-15 

0 

Color Scale 

(nanograms) 

SG-17 

Grass 

Watermain 

LEGEND 


100 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C5-C9 (nanograms) 

SG-08 



SM-GP-01 



MW-10 



Scale in Feet 

Figure 3-1 


TPH C5-C9 



0 

30 

60 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL

150,000 

140,000 

130,000 

120,000 

110,000 

100,000 

90,000 

Clean 

80,000 

70,000 

60,000 

50,000 

40,000 

SG-06 

SM-GP-01 

30,000 

20,000 

SG-02 

SM-GP-02 

SG-07 

10,000 

0 

Color Scale 

(nanograms) 

5,454 

SG-13 

Floor Drain 

SG-25 

SG-10 

11,421 

SG-09 

SM-GP-03 

SG-08 

SM-GP-04 

SM-GP-06 

Floor Drain 

SM-GP-05 

SG-01 

SG-03 

149,146 

SG-14 

Floor Drain 

4,367 

SG-22 

SM-GP-09 

SG-04 

10,854 

SM-GP-07 SG-19 

SG-18 

SM-GP-08 

9,660 

SG-20 

LEGEND 

100 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C5-C9 (nanograms) 

SG-08 



SM-GP-01 



MW-10 



Scale in Feet 

Figure 3-2 


TPH C5-C9 



0 

10 

20 

Dry Cleaner 

Romeoville, IL

Attachments

Attachment 1 

FIELD PROCEDURES FOR 

PASSIVE SOIL-GAS SURVEYS 

The following field procedures are routinely used during a BEACON Passive Soil-Gas Survey. 

Modifications can be and are incorporated from time to time in response to individual project 

requirements. In all instances, BEACON adheres to EPA-approved Quality Assurance and Quality 

Control practices. 

A. Field personnel carry a BESURE Sample Collection Kit and support equipment to the site and 

deploy the passive samplers in a prearranged survey pattern. A passive sampler consists of a 

glass vial containing hydrophobic adsorbent cartridges with a length of wire attached to the vial 

for retrieval. Although samplers require only one person for emplacement and retrieval, the 

specific number of field personnel required depends upon the scope and schedule of the project. 

Each Sampler emplacement generally takes less than two minutes. 

B. At each survey point a field technician clears vegetation as needed and, using a hammer drill with 

a 1″- to 1½″-diameter bit, creates a hole 12 to 14 inches deep. [Note: For locations covered with 

asphalt, concrete, or gravel surfacing, the field technician drills a 1″- to 1½″-diameter hole 

through the surfacing to the soils beneath]. The hole is then sleeved with a 1″-diameter metal 

sleeve. 

C. The technician then removes the solid plastic cap from a sampler and replaces it with a Sampling 

Cap (a plastic cap with a hole covered by screen meshing). The technician inserts the sampler, 

with the Sampling Cap end facing down, into the hole (see attached figure). The sampler is then 

covered with either local soils for uncapped locations or, for capped locations, aluminum foil and 

a concrete patch. The sampler's location, time and date of emplacement, and other relevant 

information are recorded on the Field Deployment Form. 

D. One or more trip blanks are included as part of the quality-control procedures. 

E. Once all the passive samplers have been deployed, field personnel schedule sampler recovery and 

depart, taking all other equipment and materials with them. 

F. Field personnel retrieve the samplers at the end of the exposure period. At each location, a field 

technician withdraws the sampler from its hole, removes the retrieval wire, and wipes the outside 

of the vial clean using gauze cloth; following removal of the Sampling Cap, the threads of the 

vial are also cleaned. A solid plastic cap is screwed onto the vial and the sample location number 

is written on the label. The technician then records sample-point location, date, time, etc. on the 

Field Deployment Form. 

G. Sampling holes are refilled with soil, sand, or other suitable material. If Samplers have been 

installed through asphalt or concrete, the hole is filled to grade with a plug of cold patch or 

cement. 

H. Following retrieval, field personnel ship or transport the passive samplers to BEACON’s 

laboratory.

BEACON PSG SAMPLER 

DEPLOYMENT THROUGH SOILS 

Back-Filled Soil 

SOILS 

Hydrophobic 

Adsorbent Cartridges 

Retrieval Wire 

Sampler Vial 

Sampling Cap 

SOILS 

DEPLOYMENT THROUGH AN ASPHALT/CONCRETE CAP 

Concrete Patch 

CONCRETE or 

ASPHALT 

Aluminum Foil 

Cap & Plug 

Retrieval Wire 

CONCRETE or 

ASPHALT 

Hydrophobic 

Adsorbent Cartridges 

SOILS 

Sampler Vial 

Sampling Cap 

3/4" Metal Pipe 

SOILS

Attachment 2 

Field Deployment Report

Attachment 3 

LABORATORY PROCEDURES 

FOR PASSIVE SOIL-GAS SAMPLES 

Following are laboratory procedures used with BEACON Passive Soil-Gas Surveys, a screening 

technology for expedited site investigation. After exposure, adsorbent cartridges from the passive 

samplers are analyzed using U.S. EPA Method 8260B as described in the Solid Waste Manual (SW-846), 

a capillary gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method, modified to accommodate high temperature 

thermal desorption of the adsorbent cartridges. This procedure is summarized as follows: 

A. The adsorbent cartridges are loaded with internal standards and surrogates prior to loading the 

autosampler with the cartridges. The loaded cartridges are purged in a helium flow. Then the 

cartridges are thermally desorbed in a helium flow onto a focusing trap. Any analytes in the 

helium stream are adsorbed onto a focusing trap. 

B. Following trap focusing, the trap is thermally desorbed onto a DB-VRX 40m, 0.18 mm ID, 1.00 

micron filament thickness capillary column. 

C. The GC/MS is scanned between 35 and 270 Atomic Mass Units (AMU) at 3.12 scans per second. 

D. BFB tuning criteria and the initial five-point calibration procedures are those stated in method 

SW846-8260B. System performance and calibration check criteria are met prior to analysis of 

samples. A laboratory method blank is analyzed after the daily standard to determine that the 

system is contaminant-free. 

E. The instrumentation used for these analyses includes: 

• Agilent 6890-5973 Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer; 

• Markes Unity thermal desorber; 

• Markes UltrA autosampler; and 

• Markes Mass Flow Controller Module.

Attachment 4 

Chain-of-Custody Form

APPENDIIX B 

WELL SURVEY DOCUMENTATION

Illinois Environmental 

Protection Agency 

Source Water Assessment Program 

FACT SHEET 

ROMEOVILLE 

WILL COUNTY 

Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey. 

Information and data used in the preparation of this Fact Sheet are provided by 

the Illinois EPA and are subject to revision. 

IMPORTANCE OF SOURCE WATER: 

Romeoville (Facility Number 1970900) utilize eleven active public water supply wells. Well #1(IEPA #22124) and #3- 

#5 (IEPA #22126-#22128), well #7 (IEPA #00621), well #8 (IEPA #00619), well #9 (IEPA #00618), well #10 (IEPA 

#00620), well #11 (IEPA #01115), well #12 (IEPA #01281), and well #13 (IEPA #01282) distribute approximately 

3,286,000 gallons per day to an estimated population of 33,331 at 10,403 service connections. 

WATER SUPPLIES THAT OBTAIN SOURCE WATER FROM THIS FACILITY: 

No connected water supplies existed at the time this Source Water Assessment fact sheet was completed. 

SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY: 

Well #1 is located off Norman Town Rd. 30 feet east of the main pump station. Well #3 is located on Beverly Griffin 

Drive by Lake Shirley. Well #4 is located on Fairfax Street near Macon Avenue next to the tower. Well #5 is located 

off of Marquette Road next to the tower. Well #7 is located on Lot 22 Barr Industrial Subdivision. Well #8 is located 

130 feet south and 1280 feet east of Weber Road and 119th Street. Well #9 is located on North Carillon Drive, west of 

Parcel 8. Well #10 is located 220 feet south and 1280 feet east of Weber Road and 119th Street. Well #11 is located 

on South Carillon Drive. Well #12 and #13 are located off Airport Road, east of Interstate Route 55. Well #1, #3, well 

#7, well #8 and well #12 utilize a shallow bedrock aquifer of the Silurian formation. Well #8 utilizes a shallow 

bedrock of the Silurian formation. As a result well #1, well 3, well #5, well #8 and #12 are considered geologically 

sensitive. The aquifers utilized by this facility's wells are overlain by till or other fine grained material of low 

permeability (permeability is a measure of the ability of a soil or sediment to transmit fluids). Wells #4, well #7, well 

#9, well #10, well #11and #13 are not considered geologically sensitive by the Illinois EPA. 

WELL DATA FOR THIS FACILITY: 

Well data ID is unavailable Well as Description of January 2001 or does Status not exist Depth for this (Feet) community Min Setback water (Feet) supply. Aquifer Description 

00618 W 9 N CARILLON DRIVE WEST OF A 1505 200 Cambrian/Ordovician 

00619 W8 130 FT S & 1280 FT E OF WEB A 200 400 Devonian/Silurian 

00620 W10 220 FT S & 1300 FT E WEBER A 1505 200 Cambrian/Ordovician 

00621 W7 LOT 22 BARR IND SBDV A 300 200 Devonian/Silurian 

22124 W1 NORMAN TOWN RD 30FT E O A 165 400 Devonian/Silurian 

22125 W2 NORMAN TOWN RD IN MPS 5 I 1458 200 Cambrian/Ordovician 

22126 W3 BEVERLY GRIFFITH DR BY LA A 156 400 Devonian/Silurian 

22127 W4 FAIRFAX ST NEAR MACON AV A 1524 200 Cambrian/Ordovician 

22128 W5 OFF OF MARQUETTE RD NEX A 250 400 Mixed 

01115 WELL 11 SOUTH CARILLON DRIV A 1555 200 Cambrian/Ordovician

Well ID Well Description Status Depth (Feet) Min Setback (Feet) Aquifer Description 

01281 WELL 12 CL AND FL DISCH TO SY A 230 400 Devonian/Silurian 

01282 WELL 13 CL AND FL DISCH TO DI A 1510 200 Cambrian/Ordovician 

SOURCE WATER QUALITY: 

Romeoville wells were sampled as part of the Statewide Groundwater Monitoring Program beginning on July 29, 

1987. The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and inorganic chemicals (IOC). Well #10 

was also sampled for synthetic organic compounds (SOC). 

Review of the VOC and SOC analyses did not detect quantifiable levels of any organic compounds. Review of the 

IOC collected from these sampling efforts indicate that parameters are consistent with other wells utilizing bedrock 

aquifers in northeastern Illinois. It should also be noted that the IOC results were consistent between all the wells and 

all results were below the groundwater quality standards established under 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 

620.410. 

FINISHED WATER QUALITY: 

Finished water quality data tables of monitored parameters, contaminants detected, health advisory information, 

drinking water standards or maximum contaminant levels are available at http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/. Similar 

information on finished water quality is included in the Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) provided by the water 

supply to its customers. Total coliform bacteria was positive in six samples taken in 1999. In addition, Gross Alpha 

was detected in a sample taken in 1999, at a level of 15.25 picoCuries per liter (pCi/l), which is above the maximum 

contaminant level of 15 pCi/l. 

POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION: 

The sites labeled on the Wellhead Protection Planning Map and included in the following tables are considered 

"potential" sources of contamination. (Maps and tables are not available in the Visually Impaired Accessible version. 

However, the information presented in the maps and tables is summarized within the following text sections of this fact 

sheet.) The Illinois EPA performed a detailed Well Site Survey in 1989 to identify potential sources of contamination 

to the Romeoville wells. These sources are identified based on the nature of their activity, the availability of data in 

electronic databases, and their geographic proximity to the source water protection area. In addition, the Illinois EPA 

made use of information from its leaking underground storage tank database 

(http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/ust/search.asp) and site remediation program database 

(http://epadata.epa.state.il.us/land/srp/search.asp) to further assess potential sources of contamination to the village's 

source water. These databases include information from the Illinois EPA Division of Land Pollution Control (LPC) 

and the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA). The following is a list of facilities contained within these 

databases. 

IEMA # LPC # Site Name Address City ZIP Code 

20000363 1970905049 Speedway SuperAmerica 701 North Independence St. Romeoville 60446 

20000738 1970905049 Speedway SuperAmerica 701 North Independance St. Romeoville 60446 

20001858 1970905023 Equilon Enterprises 1 Alexander Dr. Romeoville 60446 


20021139 1970905077 Nicor Gas 1715 North Parkwood Dr. Romeoville 60446 

871027 1970905034 Valley View School Newland & Arsenal Romeoville 60441 

900537 1970905020 Amoco Oil Co. #18635 Rt. 53 & 135th St. Romeoville 60441 

900993 1970905021 Illinois Bell Telephone 111 Devonwood Ave. Romeoville 60441 

901175 1970905029 Mickey's Tire & Sevice Ctr. 49 Naperville Rd. Romeoville 60441 

901747 1970900011 McKesson Drug & Health Care 1355 Enterprise Romeoville 60441 

910168 1970905013 Village Ford Sales Inc.. Rt. 53 & Normantown Rd. Romeoville 60441 

910185 1970905028 Bible Baptist Church 301 Normantown Rd. Romeoville 60441 

912677 1970905005 Babson Brothers Chemical Division 1354 Enterprise Dr. Romeoville 60441 

920095 1970905019 Lewis University Rt. 53 Romeoville 60441 

923663 1970905053 Block, Ross 717 Parkwood Ave. Romeoville 60441 

931740 1970905057 Ryder Truck Rental 1290 Enterprise Dr. Romeoville 60441 

941082 1970905049 Emro Marketing 701 North Independence Romeoville 60441 

941264 1970905037 Clark Oil & Refining 651 North Independence Romeoville 60441 

950631 1970905049 Emro Marketing 701 North Independence Romeoville 60441

960491 1970905081 Go Mart Convenience Stores 344 North Independence St. Romeoville 60446 

970319 1970500010 Delta Concrete Products LLC Rt. 53 & Rt. 7 Romeoville 60441 

970742 1970905019 Lewis Bakeries (Campus) Rt. 53 Romeoville 60441 

972002 1970905027 Emro Marketing 335 Independence Blvd. Romeoville 60441 

982434 1970900012 Clean-Way Sweeping 643 Parkwood Ave. Romeoville 60446-1348 

990790 1970905090 Joliet Regional Port District 16116 Airport Road Romeoville 60441 

992197 1970905049 Speedway SuperAmerica 701 North Independance St. Romeoville 60441 


LPC# Site Name Street City ZIP Code 

1970900003 Mid-West Spring Manufacturing Co. 8 Greenwood Avenue Romeoville 60446- 

SITE DATA FOR THIS FACILITY: 

As Well of January ID Map 2001, Codesite data is unavailable Site Name or does not exist for this community Site Description water supply. Distance (Feet) 

22124 05033 G & J TIRE & AUTO SERVICE INC. AUTO REPAIR 1280 

22124 05032 BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH FORMER PETROLEUM STORAGE 320 

22125 05033 G & J TIRE & AUTO SERVICE INC. AUTO REPAIR 1360 

22125 05032 BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH FORMER PETROLEUM STORAGE 380 

22127 05034 COMMONWEALTH EDISON ELECTRICAL GENERATOR/SUBST 940 

22128 05035 WHITE PINE LUMBER CO TREATED WOOD/LUMBER YARD 120 

22128 05040 SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP MANUFACTURING PROCESS (e.g. 540 

22128 05039 U-HAUL MINI STORAGE WAREHOUSE 620 

22128 05038 CONTINENTAL CABLE VISION OFFICE 430 

22128 05037 HERLIHY MID-CONTINENT CO WAREHOUSE 100 

22128 05036 UNKNOWN WAREHOUSE 1120 

OTHER IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL SOURCES: 

For this community water supply, no additional potential sources of contamination have been identified beyond 

those in Illinois EPA databases. 

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CONTAMINATION: 

Based on information obtained in a Well Site Survey published in 1989 by the Illinois EPA, eight potential sources or 

possible problem sites were identified within the survey area of Romeoville's wells. Furthermore, information 

provided by the Leaking Underground Storage Tank and Remedial Project Management Sections of the Illinois EPA 

indicated several additional sites with ongoing remediations which may be of concern. 

The Illinois EPA has determined that the Romeoville's wells #4, #7, #9, #10, #11, and #13 source water is not 

susceptible to contamination. This determination is based on a number of criteria including; monitoring conducted at 

the wells; monitoring conducted at the entry point to the distribution system; and the available hydrogeologic data on 

the well. 

Furthermore, in anticipation of the U.S. EPA's proposed Ground Water Rule, the Illinois EPA has determined that the 

Romeoville Community Water Supply is not vulnerable to viral contamination. This determination is based upon the 

fact that the following criteria were evaluated during the Vulnerability Waiver Process: the village's wells are properly 

constructed with sound integrity and proper site conditions; a hydrogeologic barrier exists which should prevent 

pathogen movement; all potential routes and sanitary defects have been mitigated such that the source water is 

adequately protected; monitoring data did not indicate a history of disease outbreak; and the sanitary survey of the 

water supply did not indicate a viral contamination threat. Because the village's wells are constructed in both confined 

and unconfined aquifers, the Illinois EPA evaluated the well hydraulics associated with Romeoville well fields. Wells 

#4, #7, #9, #10,#11, and #13 have a confining layer of clay above the portion of the aquifer contributing a significant 

quantity of groundwater to the screened interval. This should provide an adequate degree of protection to prevent the 

movement of pathogens into the well. 

SOURCE WATER PROTECTION EFFORTS: 

The Illinois Environmental Protection Act provides minimum protection zone of 400 feet for Romeoville well #1, well 

#3, well #5, well #8 and well #12 and 200 feet for well #4, well #7, well #9, well #10, well #11and #13. These

minimum protection zones are regulated by the Illinois EPA. 

To further minimize the risk to the groundwater supply, the Illinois EPA recommends that four additional activities be 

assessed. First, the village may wish to enact a "maximum setback zone" ordinance to further protect their water 

supply. These ordinances are authorized by the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and allow county and municipal 

officials the opportunity to provide additional protection up to a fixed distance, normally 1,000 feet, from their wells. 

Second, the village should explore the options of either properly abandoning the inactive well or retrofitting it for 

active use as a source of water supply. Inactive wells that are not properly abandoned can act as direct conduits for 

surficial contaminants into the aquifer and are considered "routes" under the Environmental Protection Act. Third, the 

water supply staff may wish to revisit their contingency planning documents. Contingency planning documents are a 

primary means to ensure that, through emergency preparedness, the village will minimize their risk of being without 

safe and adequate water. Finally, the water supply staff is encouraged to review their cross connection control program 

to ensure that it remains current and viable. Cross connections to either the water treatment plant (for example, at bulk 

water loading stations) or in the distribution system may negate all source water protection initiatives provided by the 

village.

APPENDIX B - WATER WELL DOCUMENTATION 


ROMEOVILLE, ILLINOIS 

Water Well Survey Database 

Map ID Sec Twp Dir Rng Dir Owner Name Driller Status 

Total 

Depth 

Formation 

Date 

Installed 

1 33 37 N 10 E Romeoville James W. Bilskey Community Supply 1458 Bedrock 1959 

2 33 37 N 10 E Romeoville Red Duck Drllling Co. Community Supply 165 Bedrock 1958 

E:\2007\07292\Calculations & Data\Natural Resources\Environmental\Well Survey\Well Database 07292.xls Page 1 of 1

Well Survey Correspondence 

Spatans' Square Shopping Center 

Romeoville, Illinois 

Organization 

Contact Name - Title 

Date 

Notes/Comments/Information 

Illinois Department of Public Health 

Environmental Health 

Department 

9/14/2009 

Indicated to contact ISWS, all of their data has been combined into their 

database. 

ISGS Online Well Database 

9/14/2009 

Accessed website, dowloaded database of private wells and downloaded 

boring logs. 

IEPA Source Water Assessment Program 

9/14/2009 

Accessed website, downloaded database of non-community, community 

wells and setback zones. 

ISWS 

Susie Dodd - Associate 

Supportive Scientist 

9/14/2009 

Acknowledged online data from the ISGS and IEPA websites, V3 ordered 

ISWS's Well Database and Illinois Water Inventory Program (IWIP) 

Database scans for T37N R10E Sect. 27, 28, 33, & 34. 

Will County Health Department 


Environmental Health 

Department 

Chris Drey - Public Works 

Water Department 

Superintendent 

5/18/2010 Left multiple messages, waiting to hear back. 

5/18/2010 

Indicated Village of Romeoville's municipal water is supplied by 12 

community wells. Wells #1 and #2 (located within the site's 2,500ft. search 

radius) are currently active. Well #6 (located within the site's 2,500ft. search 

radius based on ISWS records) was permitted but never constructed. He 

did not know the proposed location for Well #6.

APPENDIIX C 

SOIL BORING & WELL CONSTRUCTION LOGS

10233 



1053149.23 1815883.19 615 


12 

Boring Name SM-GP-110 

soil sampling/well 

In laundromat, located between 

second row of washers 

730 845 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 12 2 

11 

Bentonite 

Johnson Probing 

Geoprobe 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 

Depth (ft) PID (ppm) PP (tsf) % Recov eryWell 



Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Concrete- - ------ 

0 

Fill- gray and brown- mixed sand and grav el with 

bricks-non-plastic--non-cohesive-moist--clay content increases with depth 


2 

2.7 

1 

90 

SM-GP-110(X-110A) 

0 

3 

Fill- gray and brown- silty mottled clay with bricks and grav el-low 

plasticity --moderate cohesion-moist--brown mottling, becomes rusty with 

depth 

4 

0 

1 

6 

0 

GC (Clay ey Grav el)- light brown- clay ey grav el, well 

graded-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-moist-- 

90 

8 

0 

10 

0 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- fine to medium sand with 

grav el-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-moist-- 

SM-GP-110(X-110B) 

20 

0 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - well graded 

grav el-non-plastic---wet/saturated-- 


12 

- - Ref usal at 12'------ 


10247 



1053236.42 1815778.90 615 


15 

Boring Name SM-MW-01 


45' south 25' east of southwest 

corner of building 

1200 1430 

4/27/2009 4/27/2009 10 

6600 DT Truck 15 2 

10 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Jim/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0.47 

3 




2 

80 

0.1 

4 

0.35 

6 



depth 

6 

100 

8 

0.60 

7 

10 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- gray- angular dolomite grav el with sand 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesive-moist--clay content decreases with depth 


0 

12 

0.03 

8 

100 

14 

CL (Lean Clay )- gray- sandy clay with gravel-moderate plasticity--moderate 

cohesion--- 

- - Ref usal at 15', Bedrock------ 


10258 



18 



15' south of laundromat entrance 

1053166.98 1815836.28 615 


1500 1730 

4/27/2009 4/27/2009 9 

6600 DT Truck 18 2 

9 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Jim/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0.01 

5 

Asphalt- - ------ 




2 

4 

20 



depth 

0 

6 

50 




8 

10 

2.29 

6 


cohesion--- 

10.4 

12 

14 

0.09 

6 

60 




0 

16 

0 

50 

18 


cohesion--- 



10267 



15 



East of tobacco shop 

1053257.22 1815865.43 615 


900 1140 

4/28/2009 4/28/2009 10 

6600 DT Truck 15 2 

10 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Jim/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

30 

0 

4 




0 

6 

0.00 

8 

8 

0.04 

2 

70 

0 


cohesion--- 

10 

0 

12 

0 

70 


matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesive-wet/saturated--clay content decreases with 

depth 


14 

0 

ML (Silt)- gray - clay ey silt-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated-- 



10277 



1053155.72 1815769.10 615 


15 



80' south of laundromat maintenance 

room 

1200 1700 

4/28/2009 4/28/2009 10 

6600 DT Truck 15 2 

10 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Jim/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

70 




0 

2 

4 

6 

0 

0 

2 


cohesion--- 

0 

70 

8 

0 

10 

12 

0 

70 



depth 


0 

14 



10173 



1053173.00 1815887.00 615 


6.75 


soil sampling 

In Laundromat. Located between 

washer and dryers, approximately 30' 

from southern wall 

915 1020 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Hand Cart 6.75 2 

Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 

PP (tsf)% Recovery . 



Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Concrete- - 3------ 

0 

80 

Fill- brown- sand and grav el------ 


SM-GP-01(0-2) 

2 

4 

0 

0 

1 

2 

80 

Fill- light brown and gray -7.5 5/8 silty clay with little to some sand and grav el-low 

plasticity -medium cons.-high cohesion-moist--brown mottling with rust 

Becomes less 

cohesive and less 

plastic with depth. 

Becomes sandier with 

depth. No odor or 

visual 

6 

0 

10 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- f ractured weathered dolomite----moist-poorly sorted- 


- - Ref usal at 6.75'------ 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10184 



1053169.00 1815883.00 615 


7 


soil sampling 




1110 1200 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Hand Cart 7 2 

Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 

80 



2 

4 

6 

0 

0 

0 

2 

0.5 

80 

70 




Becomes less 





visual 


SM-GP-02(2-4) 

- - Ref usal at 7'------ 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10192 



1053162.00 1815872.00 615 


7 


soil sampling 




820 900 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 


Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


6.6 

70 



SM-GP-03(0-2) 

2 

4 

0 

0 

1.5 

1.5 

70 

60 



Becomes less 





visual 

6 

0 

60 



SM-GP-03(6-7) 

- - Ref usal at 7'------ 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10200 



6 


soil sampling 

In laundromat storage room 

1053158.00 1815864.00 615 


1000 1105 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

N/A 

Hand Auger 6 2 

Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0.4 

100 



SM-GP-04(0-2) 

2 

4 

6 

0 

0.4 

0 

3 

1 

100 

100 




- - Ref usal at 6'------ 

Becomes less 





visual 


8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10208 



6 


soil sampling 

In laundromat mechanical room 

1053155.00 1815855.00 615 


1300 1400 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

N/A 

Hand Auger 6 2 

Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 

100 



SM-GP-05(0-2) 

2 

4 

6 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

100 

100 




- - Ref usal at 6'------ 

Becomes less 





visual 


SM-GP-05(2-4) 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10216 



7 


soil sampling 

In laundromat hallway 

1053160.00 1815861.00 615 


1400 1500 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 


Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 

100 



2 

4 

6 

0 

0 

0 

1.5 

1.5 

100 

100 




Becomes less 





visual 


- - Ref usal at 7'------ 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10224 



1053160.00 1815844.00 615 


12 


soil sampling 

5' to the west of the laundromat 

backdoor 

1600 1630 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 12 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 12 2 

Bentonite 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

100 



SM-GP-09(0-2) 

2 

0 

1.5 

100 

4 

0 

1.5 

100 



Becomes less 





visual 

6 

0 

100 

8 

1.6 

100 



10 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown - well-rounded coarse sand-----poorly sorted- 


0 

100 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray - well-rounded coarse grav el interbedded with f ractured 

dolomite-----poorly sorted- 


12 

- - End of boring at 12'------ 

14 

16 

18 


10234 



8 


soil sampling 

Adjacent to eastern hydraulic lift 

1054717.00 1814132.00 615 


900 930 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 8 2 

Bentonite 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

2 

0 

60 



4 

0 

60 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- brown- sub-angular coarse sand with some grav el--loose-low 

cohesion-moist-poorly sorted- 


0 

90 

SM-GP-10(4-6) 

6 

0 

0.5 

90 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- reddish brown- sub-angular grav el with some 

clay --loose--moist-poorly sorted- 


8 

- - End of Boring at 8'------ 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10242 



8 


soil sampling 

Adjacent to central hydraulic lift 

1054593.00 1814132.00 615 


845 900 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 5 

6600 DT Truck 8 2 

5 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

50 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

0 

50 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- reddish brown- sub-angular grav el with some 

clay --loose--moist-poorly sorted- 


4 

0 

50 

6 

ML (Silt)- olive gray - sandy silt-non-plastic--low cohesion-wet/saturated-- 


8 

0 

1.5 

50 

OL (Organic Clay /Silt - nonplastic)- oliv e gray- clayey silt---low cohesion-moist-- 



SM-GP-11(6-8) 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10252 



8 


soil sampling 

Adjacent to western hydraulic lift 

1054465.00 1814132.00 615 


800 845 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 7 

6600 DT Truck 8 2 

7 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

2.5 

80 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

0 

1.5 

80 

Fill- gray and brown- silty mottled clay with bricks and gravel-low plasticity--moderate 

cohesion-moist--brown mottling 


4 

0 

60 

SM-GP-12(4-6) 

6 

SC (Clayey Sand)- y ellowish brown- clay ey sand with some grav el-low 

plasticity -loose-high cohesion-moist-poorly sorted- 


0 

60 

8 


10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10261 



1052801.39 1815857.08 615 


20 


soil sampling 

West of hardware store is grassy 

area 

1345 1345 

11/17/2008 11/17/2008 12 

6600 DT Truck 20 2 

12 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

- - Grass------ 

0 

2 

OH (Organic Clay /Silt - plastic)- - Topsoil------ 

2 

4 

0 

2.5 

80 


cohesion-moist--brown mottling, becomes rusty with depth 


0 

2.5 

6 

8 

0 

90 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- gray with rust- angular dolomite grav el with silt 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated-- 


0 

2.5 

SM (Silty Sand)- dark gray- silty sand with gravel-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated-- 

10 

0 

ML (Silt)- gray - clay ey silt-non-plastic--low cohesion-moist-- 

SM-GP-101(X-101) 

12 

0 

90 

14 

16 

0 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray - well-rounded coarse grav el interbedded with f ractured 



18 

0 

70 

0 


10271 



19 


soil sampling 

North of hardware store in asphalt 

1052904.61 1815957.93 615 


1525 1630 

11/17/2008 11/17/2008 8.5 

6600 DT Truck 19 2 

8.5 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

0 

3.5 

70 




4 

0 

6 

8 

0 

70 

SC (Clayey Sand)- light brown- clayey sand with gravel------ 

0 

4 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- angular dolomite gravel with silt 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated-- 


10 

0 

4 

12 

0 

4 

90 

CL (Lean Clay )- gray - silty clay with trace sand and gravel-high plasticity ---moist-- 

14 

0 

4 

SM-GP-102(X-102) 

16 

18 

0 

0 

100 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- angular dolomite gravel with silt 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated--becomes more rounded with depth 




10280 



1053128.16 1815867.29 615 


19 


soil sampling 

6' south of Chinese Buffet in asphalt 

parking lot 

1645 1730 

11/17/2008 11/17/2008 12 

6600 DT Truck 19 2 

12 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

0 

10 

Fill- gray and brown- mixed sand and gravel-non-plastic--non-cohesive-moist-- 


4 

0 



6 

8 

0 

60 

ML (Silt)- light brown- silt with trace gravel-non-plastic--moderate cohesion-moist-- 

0 

10 

0 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light gray- well graded sand interbedded with small gravel lenses, 

clay matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesive-moist-- 

SM-GP-103(X-103) 

12 

0 

70 

14 

0 

16 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- well graded grav el-non-plastic---wet/saturated-- 


0 

80 

18 

0 



10288 



1053196.60 1815831.64 615 


17.5 


soil sampling 

8' west and 16' south of multi-tenant 

building 

945 1030 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 17.5 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

0 

50 

Fill- gray and brown- mixed sand and gravel-non-plastic--non-cohesive-moist--clay content 

increases with depth 


4 

0 

6 

0 

70 

8 

10 

0 

0 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- angular dolomite gravel with clay 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated--clay content decreases with depth 


SM-GP-104(X-104) 

12 

0 

100 

14 

0 

16 

0 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light gray- semi angular well graded coarse sand with grav el------ 

18 

- - Ref usal at 17.5', Bedrock------ 


10296 



16 


soil sampling 

27' south of the laundromat entrance 

1053168.44 1815820.44 615 


730 800 

11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

Fill- gray and brown- mixed sand and gravel with 

bricks-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-moist--clay content increases with depth 


2 

0 

2 

70 



4 

0 

6 

0 

70 

8 

SM-GP-107(X-107) 

0 

10 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light gray- angular dolomite gravel with clay 

matrix-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated--clay content decreases with depth 


0 

12 

0 

70 

14 

0 

16 

70 


18 


10304 



2.5 


soil sampling 

Inside laundromat, southwest corner 

1053148.30 1815872.45 615 


900 930 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 2.5 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


2 

0 

0 

60 



- - Ref usal at 3'------ 


4 

6 

8 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10312 



10 


soil sampling 

Inside laundromat, east side 

1053165.53 1815873.51 615 


930 1030 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 10 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 




2 

0 

2.5 

90 

Fill- green- silty mottled clay with bricks and gravel-low plasticity--moderate 


SM-GP-111(X-111A) 

4 

0 

GC (Clayey Grav el)- light brown- clayey gravel, well 


6 

0 

8 

0 

50 

SC (Clayey Sand)- light brown- clayey sand interbedded with clay ey 

grav el-non-plastic--low cohesion-moist-- 


SM-GP-111(X-112B) 

10 

- - Ref usal at 10'------ 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10321 



9 


soil sampling 

Inside laundromat maintenance room 

1053152.41 1815849.53 615 


1045 1130 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 9 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 




2 

0 

3.5 

80 



SM-GP-112(X-112A) 

4 

CL (Lean Clay)- light brown- sandy clay with gravel-moderate plasticity --moderate 

cohesion--- 

0 

3.5 

6 

0 

75 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- f ine to medium sand with 



8 

0 

SM-GP-112(X-112B) 

- - Ref usal at 9'------ 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10329 



9 


soil sampling 

In alley, west of laundromat 

1053138.23 1815870.47 615 


1200 1245 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 9 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 




2 

0 

1.5 

80 

4 

10.8 

2.5 



SM-GP-113(X-113A) 

6 

0 

75 

8 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- light brown- angular dolomite grav el with clay 



SM-GP-113(X-113B) 

0 

- - Ref usal at 9'------ 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10337 



1053186.99 1815855.49 615 


9 


soil sampling 

South hallway former mexican 

restaurant 

1250 1330 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 9 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 




2 

0 

3.5 

90 



SM-GP-114(X-114A) 

4 

0 

6 

0 

70 



8 

0 

SM-GP-114(X-114B) 

- - Ref usal at 9'------ 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10345 



1053186.99 1815864.90 615 


8.5 


soil sampling 

South hallway former mexican 

restaurant 

1415 1450 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 


Geoprobe 

6600 DT Truck 8.5 2 

Bentonite 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 




2 

0 

1.5 

80 

4 



0 

2.5 

6 

0 

80 



8 

0 

- - Ref usal at 8.5'------ 

SM-GP-115(X-115) 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10353 



1053180.24 1815869.67 615 


9 


soil sampling 

Southwest corner of former mexican 

restaurant 

1500 1530 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 8.5 

6600 DT Truck 9 2 

8.5 

Bentonite 


Geoprobe 

Erik 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 


0 




2 

0 

3 

80 



4 

0 

3 

6 

0 

80 



8 

0 

- - Ref usal at 8.5'------ 

SM-GP-116(X-116) 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 


10361 



1053207.27 1815775.19 615 


15 


soil sampling 

45' south of southwest corner of 

building 

1245 1400 

11/19/2008 11/19/2008 10 

6600 DT Truck 15 2 

10 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 


PP (tsf) 

% Recovery . 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 




2 

0 

3 

50 



SM-GP-118(X-118A) 

4 

0 

SC (Clayey Sand)- light brown- clayey sand interbedded with clay ey 

grav el-non-plastic--low cohesion-moist-- 


6 

8 

0 

90 

GC (Clayey Grav el)- reddish gravel- clay ey gravel, well 


0 

CL (Lean Clay )- gray - sandy clay with gravel-moderate plasticity --moderate cohesion--- 

SM-GP-118(X-118B) 

10 

12 

0 

0 

50 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- gray - angular dolomite grav el with clay 



14 

0 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- gray - f ine to medium sand with 




16 

18 


10233 



1053169.00 1815843.00 615 


16 


soil sampling/temp well 

5' to the east of the laundromat 

backdoor 

1520 1540 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 12 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 

9.6 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

50 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

4 

0 

0 

1 

1 

50 

100 

Fill- light brown and gray -7.5 5/8 silty clay with little to some sand and 

grav el-low plasticity -medium cons.-high cohesion-moist--brown mottling with 

rust 

Becomes less cohesiv e 

and less plastic with 

depth. Becomes sandier 

with depth. No odor or 

v isual 

6 

8 

0 

1 

100 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - fractured weathered 


SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- well-rounded coarse sand-----poorly 

sorted- 



4.5 

100 

10 

4.5 

100 

SM-GP-07(10-12) 

12 

0 

100 


with fractured dolomite----wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


14 

0 

100 

16 

- - End of boring at 16'------ 

18 


10246 



1053166.00 1815831.00 615 


18.5 



15' to the south of the laundromat 

backdoor 

1540 1600 

1/28/2008 1/28/2008 12 

6600 DT Truck 18.5 2 

9 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Keith/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

20 

Asphalt- - ------ 

Fill- brown- sand and grav el----moist-- 


2 

0 

4 

- - No Recov ery ------ 


0 

6 

2 

50 




8 

4.1 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- well-rounded coarse sand----moist-poorly 

sorted- 


SM-GP-08(8-10) 

10 

0 

100 

12 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - fractured 



0 

100 

14 

0 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light brown- coarse sand----wet/saturated-poorly 

sorted- 


16 

0 

100 


with fractured dolomite----wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


18 



10255 



1054437.00 1814300.00 615 


17 



Northwest corner of Spartan's 

Square building 

930 1025 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 6 

6600 DT Truck 17 2 

6 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

70 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

4 

0 

0 

2.5 

1.5 

70 

50 



depth 


6 

0 

50 

8 

0 

90 

GW (Well Graded Grav el)- brown- sub-angular limestone grav el with 

sand-non-plastic-loose-non-cohesiv e-wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 


10 

0 

90 

12 

0 

100 

CL (Lean Clay)- gray - silty clay interbedded with 1-4 inch sand and gravel 

lenses-low plasticity ---wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 

Lenses 50% 11-12', 

become less common 

with depth 

14 

16 

0 

0 

100 

10 

CL (Lean Clay)- gray- silty clay with trace sand and grav el-low 

plasticity ---moist-- 


18 


10265 



12 



Northeast Corner of property by Sign 

1054889.00 1814645.00 615 


1025 1100 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 7 

6600 DT Truck 12 2 

7 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

60 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

0 

4 

60 

Fill- - black organic sandy loam topsoil------ 


4 

6 

0 

70 



depth 


0 

70 

8 

0 

100 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- brown- sub-angular dolomite grav el with 



10 

12 

0 

100 

GC (Clay ey Grav el)- gray - silty clay interbedded with 1-4 sand and grav el 





14 

16 

18 


10275 



17 



20' north of laundromat frontdoor 

1054795.00 1814326.00 615 


1100 1210 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 17 2 

11 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

2 

1.2 

70 

Asphalt- - ------ 



depth 


SM-GP-15(0-2) 

0 

70 

4 

ML (Silt)- gray and brown- silt with trace 

sand-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-moist--brown mottling 


0 

50 

6 

0 

50 

CL (Lean Clay)- gray and brown- silty clay with little sand-low 


depth 


8 

10 

0 

90 




0 

90 

12 

0 

100 

14 

GC (Clay ey Grav el)- gray - silty clay interbedded with 1-4 inch sand and 

grav el lenses-low plasticity---wet/saturated-poorly sorted- 

0 

100 

16 

0 

10 


18 


10285 



1054868.00 1814330.00 615 


14 



Northeast corner of building in front 

of Subway 

1210 1245 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 14 2 

11 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

2 

0 

80 

Asphalt- - ------ 



depth 


0 

4 

80 

4 




0 

1.5 

80 

6 

0 

4 

80 

CL (Lean Clay)- gray and brown- silty clay with little sand-low 


depth 


8 

10 

0 

80 




0 

80 

12 

0 

4 

80 

GC (Clay ey Grav el)- gray - silty clay interbedded with 1-4 sand and grav el 


14 

- - Ref usal at 14'------ 

16 

18 


10294 



1054744.00 1814325.00 615 


17 



In front of Chinese Buffet, 46' to the 

west of the laundromat front door 

1245 1300 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 17 2 

11 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

90 

Asphalt- - ------ 



2 

0 

2 

90 



depth 


4 

0 

0.5 

40 

6 




0 

0.5 

40 

8 

0 

1.5 

80 

GM (Silty Grav el)- gray- silty grav el with sand-non-plastic---moist-- 


10 

0 

80 

12 




0 

100 

14 

16 

0 

0 

100 

10 





18 


10304 



17 



47' north of laundromat frontdoor 

1054795.00 1814351.00 615 


1300 1345 

4/11/2008 4/11/2008 12 

6600 DT Truck 17 2 

12 

Bentonite 

Paramount 

Geoprobe 

Rob/Bob 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

0 

2.5 

90 

Asphalt- - ------ 

2 

0 

4 

90 



depth 


4 

0 

0.5 

60 

6 

8 

0 

0.5 

60 


sand-non-plastic--non-cohesiv e-moist--brown mottling, becomes rusty with 

depth 


0 

0.5 

100 

10 

0 

0.5 

100 

12 

0 

100 

14 

0 

100 




16 

0 

10 



18 


10313 



16 



20' west of laundromat 

1053116.03 1815844.89 615 


1045 1100 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

2 

30 




SM-GP-105(X-105A) 

0 

2.5 

4 

0 

2.5 



depth 

6 

0 

60 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - angular dolomite grav el with clay 


depth 


8 

10 

0 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light gray - semi angular well graded coarse sand with 

grav el------ 

SM-GP-105(X-105B) 

0 

12 

14 

0 

100 

SW (Well Graded Sand)- light gray - well rounded, well graded f ine to medium 

sand with grav el seams------ 

16 

0 

100 


18 


10322 



18.5 



27' south of the corner of laundromat 

1053136.77 1815818.65 615 


1315 1400 

11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 18.5 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

3 




2 

4 

0 

4 

60 



depth 

0 

6 

0 

80 

8 

0 

10 

SM-GP-106(X-106) 

12 

0 

0 

80 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - angular dolomite grav el with clay 


depth 


14 

16 

0 

80 

0 

18 

0 



10331 



16 



South of former mexican restuarant 

1053181.43 1815845.16 615 


815 900 

11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

0 

1.5 




2 

4 

0 

3 

40 



depth 

SM-GP-108(X-108A) 

0 

2 

6 

8 

0 

80 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light brown- angular dolomite grav el with clay 



0 

10 

3.1 

CL (Lean Clay )- gray- silty clay with trace sand and gravel-high 


SM-GP-108(X-108B) 

12 

0.38 

7 

90 

14 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light gray - well graded 

grav el-non-plastic---wet/saturated-- 


16 


18 


10340 



1053194.55 1815801.56 615 


16 



22' south and 10' west of southwest 

corner of the building 

1130 1230 

11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11 

6600 DT Truck 16 2 

11 

Bentonite 

OSE 

Geoprobe 

Ken/Mark 

Depth (ft) 

PID (ppm) 

PP (tsf) 

% Recovery 

Well 




Observ ations 

Observ ations 

Samples 

0 

Asphalt- - ------ 

2 

0 

50 




4 

0 



depth 

0 

6 

CL (Lean Clay)- light brown- sandy clay with grav el-moderate 

plasticity --moderate cohesion--- 

4.4 

80 

8 

10 

SM-GP-117(X-117) 

12 

8.6 

0 

80 

GW (Well Graded Gravel)- light brown- angular dolomite grav el with clay 



14 

0 

16 


18 


APPENDIIX D 

PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

PHOTO 1 

Date: 1/28/2008 

View of the Installation of 

a Soil Boring Inside the 

Laundromat. 

PHOTO 2 

Date: 7/22/2008 

View of the collection of 

soil gas sample SG-05. 

PHOTO 3 

Date: 11/18/2008 

View of the installation of 

SM-GP-110.

PHOTO 4 

Date:11/18/2008 

Installation of SM-GP-108 

in the former Mexican 

restaurant east of the 

Laundromat. 

PHOTO 5 

Date:11/18/2008 

View of OSE installing a 

soil boring to the south of 

the Laundromat. 

PHOTO 6 

Date:4/29/2009 

View of OSE installing 

SM-MW-04 to the south 

of the Laundromat.

APPENDIIX E 

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. 

CLIENT: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

Project: LPC#1970905180 

Lab Order: 0811162 

Date: 11-Dec-08 

CASE NARRATIVE 

FOC analyzed by method D2974 which is the IEPA required method for site remediation. 9040 is a 

method for pH analysis. 

Page 1 of 1



CLIENT: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Lab Order: 0811162 


Lab ID: 0811162-001 Collection Date: 11/17/2008 02:30:00 PM 


X101 

Matrix: SOLID 

Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed 

METALS ANALYSIS SW6020 (SW3050B) 

Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

13400 

738 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 07:38:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

5.49 

39.9 

U 

U 

U 

45000 

21.2 

10.8 

15.0 

24500 

12.3 

23300 

424 

U 

27.4 

3570 

U 

U 

70.8 

39.5 

U 

23.3 

41.0 

1.16 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4640 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2320 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4640 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.116 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

369 mg/Kg-dry 10 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.580 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

12/1/2008 11:33:00 AM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:01:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:01:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:01:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

12/2/2008 02:13:00 AM 

12/1/2008 11:33:00 AM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

12/1/2008 11:33:00 AM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

11/28/2008 08:29:00 PM 

CYANIDE ANALYSIS SW9014 (SW9010B) 

Analyst: AJD 

Cyanide U 0.544 mg/Kg-dry 1 11/21/2008 

ORGANIC CONTENT ANALYSIS D2974 Analyst: RMN 

Ash Content 

97.6 

0 % 1 11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 

Fractional Organic Carbon 

Organic Matter 

1.40 

2.42 

0 % 1 

0 % 1 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 

PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: CWA 

Percent Moisture 

14.9 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 1 of 10







X102 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

13000 

860 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 08:14:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

5.75 

39.9 

U 

U 

U 

49200 

18.5 

10.4 

15.4 

23700 

12.2 

25100 

413 

U 

25.3 

3620 

U 

U 

76.6 

38.1 

U 

19.0 

41.7 


0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4740 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2370 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4740 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.118 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.592 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:18:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:38:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:38:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:38:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

12/2/2008 04:29:00 AM 

12/1/2008 12:18:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:18:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:14:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 




16.1 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 2 of 10





Lab ID: 0811162-003 Collection Date: 11/18/2008 10:00:00 AM 


X111A 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

3780 

989 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 08:24:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

4.57 

19.8 

U 

U 

U 

123000 

8.82 

3.73 

6.76 

11400 

7.50 

70600 

294 

U 

8.41 

1170 

0.629 

U 

121 

45.4 

U 

12.3 

19.2 


0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4190 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2100 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4190 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.105 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.524 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:27:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:47:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:47:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:47:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

12/2/2008 04:57:00 AM 

12/1/2008 12:27:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:27:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:23:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 




9.83 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 3 of 10







X111B 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

4410 

910 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 08:33:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

7.81 

17.4 

U 

U 

U 

123000 

8.75 

4.10 

10.2 

17600 

9.35 

72300 

284 

U 

10.2 

887 

0.953 

U 

111 

44.7 

U 

10.7 

22.5 


0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4140 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2070 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4140 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.103 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.517 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:36:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:56:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:56:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 06:56:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

12/2/2008 05:24:00 AM 

12/1/2008 12:36:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:36:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:32:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 




6.18 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 4 of 10







X114A 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

4060 1040 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 08:42:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

9.29 

31.0 

U 

U 

U 

127000 

10.7 

4.38 

8.95 

21500 

12.1 

71600 

530 

U 

10.3 

1830 

0.795 

U 

113 

50.7 

U 

13.2 

30.6 


0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4020 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2010 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4020 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.101 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.503 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:45:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:06:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:06:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:06:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

12/2/2008 06:19:00 AM 

12/1/2008 12:45:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

12/1/2008 12:45:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 

11/28/2008 09:42:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 



Ash Content 

94.2 

0 % 1 11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 



3.38 

5.82 

0 % 1 

0 % 1 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 



5.01 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 5 of 10







X108A 

Matrix: SOLID 



Ash Content 

97.1 

0 % 1 11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 




G108 

1.70 

2.93 

0 % 1 

0 % 1 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 

11/26/2008 08:45:00 AM 


Matrix: AQUEOUS 


METALS ANALYSIS SW6020 (SW3005A) 

Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

0.257 0.0200 mg/L 1 11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

U 

0.0847 

U 

0.0824 

U 

135 

U 

U 

U 

0.687 

U 

64.4 

0.0166 

U 

0.00220 

6.97 

U 

U 

138 

0.190 

U 

U 

0.00530 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

5.00 mg/L 50 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.100 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

2.50 mg/L 50 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00020 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.100 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

10.0 mg/L 50 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:19:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:19:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:19:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:27:00 AM 


Analyst: AJD 

Cyanide U 0.005 mg/L 1 11/20/2008 

Page 6 of 10







G117 

Matrix: AQUEOUS 


METALS ANALYSIS SW6020 (SW3005A) 

Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

1.22 0.0200 mg/L 1 11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

U 

0.0899 

U 

0.0805 

U 

142 

0.00373 

U 

0.00406 

3.51 

0.00278 

70.4 

0.0654 

U 

0.00633 

7.00 

U 

U 

141 

0.201 

U 

0.00245 

0.0195 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

5.00 mg/L 50 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.100 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

2.50 mg/L 50 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00020 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.100 mg/L 1 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

10.0 mg/L 50 

0.00500 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

0.00200 mg/L 1 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:28:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:28:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/27/2008 05:28:00 PM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 

11/26/2008 12:36:00 AM 


Analyst: AJD 

Cyanide U 0.005 mg/L 1 11/20/2008 

Page 7 of 10







X117 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

4720 1060 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 08:51:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

5.03 

28.0 

U 

U 

U 

142000 

10.7 

4.49 

7.74 

12700 

7.58 

84200 

406 

U 

10.3 

1810 

1.05 

U 

538 

56.4 

U 

13.3 

25.9 


0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4400 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2200 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4400 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.110 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.550 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

12/1/2008 01:22:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:15:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:15:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:15:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

12/2/2008 06:28:00 AM 

12/1/2008 01:22:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

12/2/2008 06:28:00 AM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:19:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 




11.6 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 8 of 10







X114B 

Matrix: SOLID 



Analyst: JTC 

Aluminum 

2440 

916 mg/Kg-dry 100 12/2/2008 09:28:00 PM 

Antimony 

Arsenic 

Barium 

Beryllium 

Boron 

Cadmium 

Calcium 

Chromium 

Cobalt 

Copper 

Iron 

Lead 

Magnesium 

Manganese 

Mercury 

Nickel 

Potassium 

Selenium 

Silver 

Sodium 

Strontium 

Thallium 

Vanadium 

Zinc 

U 

4.59 

8.55 

U 

U 

U 

130000 

8.15 

2.50 

6.25 

12900 

7.29 

77700 

247 

U 

7.68 

1010 

1.11 

U 

U 

53.1 

U 

9.34 

21.4 


0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4030 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 


2010 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

4030 mg/Kg-dry 100 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.101 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 


0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 

0.504 mg/Kg-dry 2 


11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

12/1/2008 01:31:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:52:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:52:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 07:52:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

12/2/2008 06:37:00 AM 

12/1/2008 01:31:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

12/2/2008 06:37:00 AM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 

11/28/2008 10:28:00 PM 


Analyst: AJD 




5.01 0.01 wt% 1 11/24/2008 10:40:00 AM 

Page 9 of 10


Qualifiers: 

B - Analyte detected in the associated method blank. 

E - Value above quantitation range. 

H - Analysis performed past holding time. 

HT - Sample received past holding time. 

J - Analyte detected between RL and MDL. 

R - RPD outside acceptance limits. 

S - Spike recovery outside acceptance limits. 

U - Analyte not detected (i.e. less than RL or MDL). 

Page 10 of 10



Work Order: 0811162 



ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT 

TestCode: 

6020_S 

Sample ID: MBS-13963 

SampType: MBLK 

TestCode: 6020_S 

Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 11/24/2008 

Run ID: ICPMS2_081128B 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 

Batch ID: 13963 TestNo: SW6020 (SW3050B) 

Analysis Date: 12/1/2008 

SeqNo: 523450 

Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual 

Antimony U 0.500 

Arsenic U 0.250 

Barium U 0.250 

Beryllium U 0.250 

Boron U 5.00 

Cadmium U 0.250 

Calcium U 40.0 

Chromium U 0.250 

Cobalt U 0.250 

Copper U 0.500 

Iron U 20.0 

Lead U 0.250 

Magnesium U 40.0 

Manganese U 0.250 

Mercury U 0.0500 

Nickel U 0.250 

Potassium U 50.0 

Selenium U 0.250 

Silver U 0.250 

Sodium U 25.0 

Strontium U 0.250 

Thallium U 0.250 

Vanadium U 0.250 

Zinc U 0.500 




Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 12/1/2008 

Run ID: ICPMS2_081201A 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 523587 


Aluminum U 10.0 

Qualifiers: 

ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit 

S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits 

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank 

J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits 

R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits 

Page 1 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_S 




Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 523632 


Lead U 0.250 


Sample ID: LCSS-13963 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 523451 


Antimony 23.94 0.500 25 0 95.8 80 120 

0 0 

Arsenic 22.13 0.250 25 0 88.5 80 120 

0 0 

Barium 25.27 0.250 25 0 101 80 120 

0 0 

Beryllium 21.7 0.250 25 0 86.8 80 120 

0 0 

Boron 22.39 5.00 25 0 89.6 80 120 

0 0 

Cadmium 20.96 0.250 25 0 83.8 80 120 

0 0 

Calcium 230.4 40.0 250 0 92.2 80 120 

0 0 

Chromium 24.96 0.250 25 0 99.8 80 120 

0 0 

Cobalt 23.4 0.250 25 0 93.6 80 120 

0 0 

Copper 23.39 0.500 25 0 93.6 80 120 

0 0 

Iron 268 20.0 250 0 107 80 120 

0 0 

Lead 22.9 0.250 25 0 91.6 80 120 

0 0 

Magnesium 241.9 40.0 250 0 96.8 80 120 

0 0 

Manganese 24.22 0.250 25 0 96.9 80 120 

0 0 

Mercury 0.825 0.0500 1 0 82.5 80 120 

0 0 

Nickel 23.72 0.250 25 0 94.9 80 120 

0 0 

Potassium 251.8 50.0 250 0 101 80 120 

0 0 

Selenium 22.44 0.250 25 0 89.7 80 120 

0 0 

Silver 21.52 0.250 25 0 86.1 80 120 

0 0 

Sodium 226.3 25.0 250 0 90.5 80 120 

0 0 

Strontium 27.88 0.250 25 0 112 80 120 

0 0 

Thallium 24.66 0.250 25 0 98.6 80 120 

0 0 

Vanadium 23.9 0.250 25 0 95.6 80 120 

0 0 

Zinc 21.61 0.500 25 0 86.4 80 120 

0 0 

Qualifiers: 






Page 2 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_S 


SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 523588 


Aluminum 25.76 10.0 25 0 103 80 120 

0 0 


SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 523633 


Lead 23.6 0.250 25 0 94.4 80 120 

0 0 

Mercury 0.837 0.0500 1 0 83.7 80 120 

0 0 

Sample ID: 0811162-001AMS 

SampType: MS 


Units: mg/Kg-dry 

Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522968 


Calcium 45560 4640 289.7 45050 177 75 125 0 0 

S 

Iron 24620 2320 289.7 24480 47.7 75 125 0 0 

S 

Magnesium 23640 4640 289.7 23270 128 75 125 0 0 

S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522982 


Antimony 7.425 1.16 28.97 0.6892 23.2 75 125 0 0 

S 

Arsenic 28.98 0.579 28.97 5.491 81.1 75 125 

0 0 

Barium 68.44 0.579 28.97 39.86 98.7 75 125 

0 0 

Beryllium 5.039 0.579 28.97 0.1241 17 75 125 0 0 

S 

Cadmium 24.5 0.579 28.97 0.1018 84.2 75 125 

0 0 

Chromium 48.35 0.579 28.97 21.2 93.7 75 125 

0 0 

Cobalt 35.18 0.579 28.97 10.82 84.1 75 125 

0 0 

Copper 37.98 1.16 28.97 14.99 79.3 75 125 

0 0 

Lead 41.04 0.579 28.97 12.3 99.2 75 125 

0 0 

Manganese 461.3 0.579 28.97 424.2 128 75 125 0 0 

S 

Qualifiers: 






Page 3 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522982 


Mercury 1.004 0.116 1.159 0 86.7 75 125 

0 0 

Nickel 51.15 0.579 28.97 27.36 82.1 75 125 

0 0 

Silver 22.16 0.579 28.97 0 76.5 75 125 

0 0 

Strontium 69.94 0.579 28.97 39.5 105 75 125 

0 0 

Thallium 27.51 0.579 28.97 0.3977 93.6 75 125 

0 0 

Vanadium 48.73 0.579 28.97 23.29 87.8 75 125 

0 0 

Zinc 61.35 1.16 28.97 40.97 70.3 75 125 0 0 

S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523481 


Boron 17.57 11.6 28.97 7.921 33.3 75 125 0 0 

S 

Selenium 21.37 0.579 28.97 0.5553 71.8 75 125 0 0 

S 

Sodium 195.3 57.9 289.7 70.83 43 75 125 0 0 

S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523563 


Potassium 5795 

572 285.8 3571 779 75 125 0 0 

S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523592 


Aluminum 17710 1140 28.58 13430 15000 75 125 0 0 

S 

Qualifiers: 






Page 4 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_S 


SampType: MS 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523637 


Lead 39.42 28.6 28.58 11.68 97.1 75 125 

0 0 

Mercury U 5.72 1.143 0 0 75 125 0 0 

S 

Sample ID: 0811162-001AMSD 

SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522969 


Calcium 48200 4670 291.7 45050 1080 75 125 45560 5.63 20 S 

Iron 24130 2330 291.7 24480 -122 75 125 24620 2.03 20 S 

Magnesium 24650 4670 291.7 23270 472 75 125 23640 4.16 20 S 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522983 


Antimony 6.663 1.17 29.17 0.6892 20.5 75 125 7.425 10.8 20 S 

Arsenic 29.24 0.583 29.17 5.491 81.4 75 125 28.98 0.892 20 

Barium 68.39 0.583 29.17 39.86 97.8 75 125 68.44 0.0721 20 

Beryllium 5.363 0.583 29.17 0.1241 18 75 125 5.039 6.24 20 S 

Cadmium 24.45 0.583 29.17 0.1018 83.5 75 125 24.5 0.210 20 

Chromium 48.19 0.583 29.17 21.2 92.5 75 125 48.35 0.319 20 

Cobalt 34.72 0.583 29.17 10.82 81.9 75 125 35.18 1.34 20 

Copper 37.22 1.17 29.17 14.99 76.2 75 125 37.98 2.00 20 

Lead 40.25 0.583 29.17 12.3 95.8 75 125 41.04 1.94 20 

Manganese 464.4 0.583 29.17 424.2 138 75 125 461.3 0.668 20 S 

Mercury 1.033 0.117 1.167 0 88.5 75 125 1.004 2.82 20 

Nickel 49.64 0.583 29.17 27.36 76.4 75 125 51.15 3.00 20 

Silver 21.9 0.583 29.17 0 75.1 75 125 22.16 1.15 20 

Strontium 68.98 0.583 29.17 39.5 101 75 125 69.94 1.38 20 

Thallium 27.66 0.583 29.17 0.3977 93.4 75 125 27.51 0.524 20 

Vanadium 48.79 0.583 29.17 23.29 87.4 75 125 48.73 0.120 20 

Qualifiers: 






Page 5 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_S 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 522983 


Zinc 61.61 1.17 29.17 40.97 70.8 75 125 61.35 0.428 20 S 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 11/24/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523482 


Boron 18.16 11.7 29.17 7.921 35.1 75 125 17.57 3.30 20 S 

Selenium 20.56 0.583 29.17 0.5553 68.6 75 125 21.37 3.86 20 S 

Sodium 200.8 58.3 291.7 70.83 44.6 75 125 195.3 2.81 20 S 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523564 



475 237.5 3571 168 75 125 5795 37.4 20 SR 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523593 


Aluminum 13880 

950 23.75 13430 1890 75 125 17710 24.2 20 SR 


SampType: MSD 



Prep Date: 12/1/2008 


Client ID: 

X101 



SeqNo: 523638 


Lead 33.48 23.7 23.75 11.68 91.8 75 125 39.42 16.3 20 

Mercury U 4.75 0.9499 0 0 75 125 0 0 20 S 

Qualifiers: 






Page 6 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_W_T 

Sample ID: MBW-13956 


TestCode: 6020_W_T 

Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 

Run ID: ICPMS2_081124C 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 

Batch ID: 13956 TestNo: SW6020 (SW3005A) 


SeqNo: 522374 


Aluminum U 0.0200 

Antimony U 0.00500 

Arsenic U 0.00500 

Barium U 0.00500 

Beryllium U 0.00400 

Boron U 0.0100 

Cadmium U 0.00100 

Calcium U 0.100 

Chromium U 0.00500 

Cobalt U 0.00500 

Copper U 0.00500 

Iron U 0.100 

Lead U 0.00500 

Magnesium U 0.100 

Manganese U 0.00500 


Nickel U 0.00500 

Potassium U 0.300 

Selenium U 0.00500 

Silver U 0.00500 

Sodium U 0.200 

Thallium U 0.00200 

Vanadium U 0.00500 

Zinc U 0.0100 

Sample ID: LCSW-13956 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522375 


Aluminum 0.4734 0.0200 0.5 0 94.7 80 120 

0 0 

Antimony 0.5591 0.00500 0.5 0 112 80 120 

0 0 

Qualifiers: 






Page 7 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_W_T 

Sample ID: LCSW-13956 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522375 


Arsenic 0.4679 0.00500 0.5 0 93.6 80 120 

0 0 

Barium 0.4964 0.00500 0.5 0 99.3 80 120 

0 0 

Beryllium 0.423 0.00400 0.5 0 84.6 80 120 

0 0 

Boron 0.4372 0.0100 0.5 0 87.4 80 120 

0 0 

Cadmium 0.465 0.00100 0.5 0 93 80 120 

0 0 

Calcium 5.192 0.100 5 0 104 80 120 

0 0 

Chromium 0.5099 0.00500 0.5 0 102 80 120 

0 0 

Cobalt 0.4954 0.00500 0.5 0 99.1 80 120 

0 0 

Copper 0.4732 0.00500 0.5 0 94.6 80 120 

0 0 

Iron 4.503 0.100 5 0 90.1 80 120 

0 0 

Lead 0.4883 0.00500 0.5 0 97.7 80 120 

0 0 

Magnesium 4.692 0.100 5 0 93.8 80 120 

0 0 

Manganese 0.4836 0.00500 0.5 0 96.7 80 120 

0 0 

Mercury 0.01619 0.000200 0.02 0 81 80 120 

0 0 

Nickel 0.5039 0.00500 0.5 0 101 80 120 

0 0 

Potassium 4.85 0.300 5 0 97 80 120 

0 0 

Selenium 0.4893 0.00500 0.5 0 97.9 80 120 

0 0 

Silver 0.4583 0.00500 0.5 0 91.7 80 120 

0 0 

Sodium 4.71 0.200 5 0 94.2 80 120 

0 0 

Thallium 0.4685 0.00200 0.5 0 93.7 80 120 

0 0 

Vanadium 0.5151 0.00500 0.5 0 103 80 120 

0 0 

Zinc 0.4508 0.0100 0.5 0 90.2 80 120 

0 0 

Sample ID: 0811118-032BMS 

SampType: MS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522393 


Aluminum 2.022 0.0200 0.5 1.322 140 75 125 0 0 

S 

Antimony 0.4583 0.00500 0.5 0.002744 91.1 75 125 

0 0 

Arsenic 0.4386 0.00500 0.5 0.007724 86.2 75 125 

0 0 

Barium 0.6397 0.00500 0.5 0.1698 94 75 125 

0 0 

Qualifiers: 






Page 8 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_W_T 

Sample ID: 0811118-032BMS 

SampType: MS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522393 


Beryllium 0.4315 0.00400 0.5 0 86.3 75 125 

0 0 

Boron 0.6838 0.0100 0.5 0.2825 80.3 75 125 

0 0 

Cadmium 0.4215 0.00100 0.5 0.001585 84 75 125 

0 0 

Calcium 101.4 0.100 5 96.88 90.4 75 125 0 0 

E 

Chromium 0.465 0.00500 0.5 0.00578 91.8 75 125 

0 0 

Cobalt 0.4356 0.00500 0.5 0.0009856 86.9 75 125 

0 0 

Copper 0.4258 0.00500 0.5 0.02839 79.5 75 125 

0 0 

Iron 11.27 0.100 5 5.863 108 75 125 

0 0 

Lead 0.7046 0.00500 0.5 0.2957 81.8 75 125 

0 0 

Magnesium 21.54 0.100 5 18.14 68 75 125 0 0 

S 

Manganese 0.882 0.00500 0.5 0.4594 84.5 75 125 

0 0 

Mercury 0.00201 0.000200 0.02 0 10.1 75 125 0 0 

S 

Nickel 0.4161 0.00500 0.5 0.004881 82.2 75 125 

0 0 

Potassium 15.2 0.300 5 11.14 81.2 75 125 

0 0 

Selenium 0.4148 0.00500 0.5 0 83 75 125 

0 0 

Silver 0.1266 0.00500 0.5 0 25.3 75 125 0 0 

S 

Sodium 21.17 0.200 5 17.72 69 75 125 0 0 

S 

Thallium 0.423 0.00200 0.5 0 84.6 75 125 

0 0 

Vanadium 0.4762 0.00500 0.5 0.003659 94.5 75 125 

0 0 

Zinc 0.7855 0.0100 0.5 0.4103 75 75 125 

0 0 

Sample ID: 0811118-032BMSD 

SampType: MSD 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522394 


Aluminum 1.918 0.0200 0.5 1.322 119 75 125 2.022 5.28 20 

Antimony 0.4667 0.00500 0.5 0.002744 92.8 75 125 0.4583 1.82 20 

Arsenic 0.4413 0.00500 0.5 0.007724 86.7 75 125 0.4386 0.614 20 

Barium 0.6522 0.00500 0.5 0.1698 96.5 75 125 0.6397 1.94 20 

Beryllium 0.4309 0.00400 0.5 0 86.2 75 125 0.4315 0.139 20 

Boron 0.6784 0.0100 0.5 0.2825 79.2 75 125 0.6838 0.793 20 

Qualifiers: 






Page 9 of 14





TestCode: 

6020_W_T 

Sample ID: 0811118-032BMSD 

SampType: MSD 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/22/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 522394 


Cadmium 0.4278 0.00100 0.5 0.001585 85.2 75 125 0.4215 1.48 20 

Calcium 98.87 0.100 5 96.88 39.8 75 125 101.4 2.53 20 S 

Chromium 0.4701 0.00500 0.5 0.00578 92.9 75 125 0.465 1.09 20 

Cobalt 0.4442 0.00500 0.5 0.0009856 88.6 75 125 0.4356 1.95 20 

Copper 0.4334 0.00500 0.5 0.02839 81 75 125 0.4258 1.77 20 

Iron 11.24 0.100 5 5.863 108 75 125 11.27 0.267 20 

Lead 0.711 0.00500 0.5 0.2957 83.1 75 125 0.7046 0.904 20 

Magnesium 21.37 0.100 5 18.14 64.6 75 125 21.54 0.792 20 S 

Manganese 0.8788 0.00500 0.5 0.4594 83.9 75 125 0.882 0.363 20 

Mercury 0.001964 0.000200 0.02 0 9.82 75 125 0.00201 2.32 20 S 

Nickel 0.4223 0.00500 0.5 0.004881 83.5 75 125 0.4161 1.48 20 

Potassium 14.93 0.300 5 11.14 75.8 75 125 15.2 1.79 20 

Selenium 0.4133 0.00500 0.5 0 82.7 75 125 0.4148 0.362 20 

Silver 0.1291 0.00500 0.5 0 25.8 75 125 0.1266 1.96 20 S 

Sodium 21.22 0.200 5 17.72 70 75 125 21.17 0.236 20 S 

Thallium 0.4303 0.00200 0.5 0 86.1 75 125 0.423 1.71 20 

Vanadium 0.4792 0.00500 0.5 0.003659 95.1 75 125 0.4762 0.628 20 

Zinc 0.782 0.0100 0.5 0.4103 74.3 75 125 0.7855 0.447 20 S 

Qualifiers: 






Page 10 of 14





TestCode: 

9014/CN_S 

Sample ID: MB-13964 


TestCode: 9014/CN_S 

Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 

Run ID: SPEC2_081121C 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521920 


Cyanide U 0.500 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 

Sample ID: LCS1-13964 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521921 


Cyanide 1.115 0.500 1.25 0 89.2 80 120 

0 0 

Sample ID: LCS2-13964 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/Kg 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521922 


Cyanide 2.125 0.500 2.5 0 85 80 120 

0 0 

Qualifiers: 






Page 11 of 14





TestCode: 

9014/CN_W(T) 

Sample ID: MB-13948 


TestCode: 9014/CN_W(T 

Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 

Run ID: SPEC2_081120A 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521104 


Cyanide U 0.00500 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 

Sample ID: LCS-13948 

SampType: LCS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521105 


Cyanide 0.0416 0.00500 0.05 0 83.2 80 120 

0 0 

Sample ID: 0811118-017A MS 

SampType: MS 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521114 


Cyanide 0.0537 0.00500 0.05 0.0098 87.8 80 120 

0 0 

Sample ID: 0811118-017A MSD 

SampType: MSD 


Units: mg/L 

Prep Date: 11/21/2008 


Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 



SeqNo: 521115 


Cyanide 0.0487 0.00500 0.05 0.0098 77.8 80 120 0.0537 9.77 20 S 

Qualifiers: 






Page 12 of 14





TestCode: 

D2974/FOC_S 

Sample ID: 0811162-001B DUP 

SampType: DUP 

TestCode: D2974/FOC_ 

Units: % 

Prep Date: 

Run ID: BALANCE1_081126B 

Client ID: 

X101 

Batch ID: R28799 TestNo: D2974 Analysis Date: 11/26/2008 

SeqNo: 522515 


Ash Content 97.54 

0 0 0 0 0 0 97.58 0.0410 20 

Fractional Organic Carbon 1.427 

0 0 0 0 0 0 1.404 1.64 20 

Organic Matter 2.46 

0 0 0 0 0 0 2.42 1.64 20 

Sample ID: 0811162-005B DUP 

SampType: DUP 


Units: % 

Prep Date: 


Client ID: 

X114A 


SeqNo: 522517 



0 0 0 0 0 0 94.18 0.853 20 


0 0 0 0 0 0 3.376 12.9 20 


0 0 0 0 0 0 5.82 12.9 20 

Sample ID: 0811162-006A DUP 

SampType: DUP 


Units: % 

Prep Date: 


Client ID: 

X108A 


SeqNo: 522519 



0 0 0 0 0 0 97.07 0.329 20 


0 0 0 0 0 0 1.699 11.6 20 


0 0 0 0 0 0 2.93 11.6 20 

Qualifiers: 






Page 13 of 14





TestCode: 

PMOIST 

Sample ID: MB-R28761 


TestCode: PMOIST 

Units: wt% 

Prep Date: 

Run ID: BALANCE2_081124A 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 


SeqNo: 522018 


Percent Moisture U 0.0100 

Sample ID: 0811179-005D DUP 

SampType: DUP 

TestCode: PMOIST 

Units: wt% 

Prep Date: 

Run ID: BALANCE2_081124A 

Client ID: 

ZZZZZ 


SeqNo: 522046 


Percent Moisture 13.85 0.0100 0 0 0 0 0 13.6 1.82 20 

Qualifiers: 






Page 14 of 14

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory 

825 N. Rutledge Springfield, Illinois 62702 217.782.9780 

LABORATORY RESULTS 

Name: 

SPARTAN SQ SHOPPING CENTER 

Project/Facility Number: 1970905180 

Date Received : 11/20/08 

Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 

Temperature C: 6.00 

Client Sample ID: X108A 

Lab Sample ID: S817728-01 

Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 

Date/Time Collected: 

11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 

0 Feet Total Depth: 

Feet 

Volatiles Organic Compounds by Purge and Trap GC/MS 

Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 

Analyte Result Qualifier 

Reporting Limit Regulatory Level 

Chloromethane ND 

2.1 

Vinyl chloride ND 

2.1 

Bromomethane ND 

2.1 

Chloroethane ND 

2.1 

Trichlorofluoromethane ND 

2.1 

Acetone ND 

10 

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 

2.1 

Methylene chloride ND 

5.2 

Carbon disulfide ND 

2.1 

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 

2.1 

Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 

2.1 

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 

2.1 

2-Butanone (MEK) * ND 

10 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 

2.1 

Bromochloromethane ND 

2.1 

Chloroform ND 

2.1 

2,2-Dichloropropane ND 

2.1 


J5 

2.1 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 

2.1 

1,1-Dichloropropene ND 

2.1 

Carbon tetrachloride ND 

2.1 

Benzene ND 

2.1 

Dibromomethane ND 

2.1 


2.1 

The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of 

custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Test results 

meet all requirements of NELAC (accredited by Florida DOH #E37645). 

Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 1 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Trichloroethene ND 

2.1 

Bromodichloromethane ND 

2.1 

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 

2.1 

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 

2.1 

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 

2.1 


2.1 

Toluene ND 

2.1 


2.1 

2-Hexanone (MBK) * ND 

2.1 

Dibromochloromethane ND 

2.1 

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 

2.1 

Tetrachloroethene 32 

2.1 

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 

2.1 

Chlorobenzene ND 

2.1 

Ethylbenzene ND 

2.1 

Bromoform ND 

2.1 

Styrene ND 

2.1 


2.1 

Xylenes, total ND 

2.1 

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 

2.1 

Isopropylbenzene ND 

2.1 

Bromobenzene ND 

2.1 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 2 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: X108B & MS/MSD 


Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.1 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11 

2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform 8.7 

2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 3 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Trichloroethene 170 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


L, J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 

Chlorobenzene 6.1 

J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 

Bromoform ND 

J2 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 


J2 

2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 4 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

Hydrocarbon Identification by FID * 

Method: 

Hydrocarbon ID 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/g 



Hydrocarbons 

See Case Narrative 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 5 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: G108 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

Pesticides/PCBs by ECD 

Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor epoxide ND 

0.050 

Endosulfan I ND 

0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 

Endosulfan II ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 

Endosulfan sulfate ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 

Methoxychlor ND 

1.0 

Endrin ketone ND 

0.10 

Endrin aldehyde ND 

0.10 

alpha-Chlordane ND 

0.050 

gamma-Chlordane ND 

0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 

Aroclor 1016 ND 

0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 6 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 7 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 8 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Semivolatiles by GC/MS 

Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.7 

2-Picoline ND 

1.7 

Methyl methanesulfonate ND 

1.7 

Ethyl methanesulfonate ND 

1.7 

Phenol ND 

1.7 

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 9 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



2-Chlorophenol ND 

1.7 

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

2-Methylphenol ND 

1.7 

2,2'-Oxybis(1-chloropropane) ND 

1.7 

Acetophenone ND 

1.7 


1.7 

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 

1.7 

Hexachloroethane ND 

1.7 

Nitrobenzene ND 

1.7 

N-Nitrosopiperidine ND 

1.7 

Isophorone ND 

1.7 

2-Nitrophenol ND 

1.7 

2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 

1.7 

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 

1.7 

2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 

1.7 

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 

1.7 

Naphthalene ND 

1.7 

4-Chloroaniline ND 

1.7 


1.7 

Hexachloropropene ND 

1.7 

Hexachlorobutadiene ND 

1.7 

N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 10 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 

1.7 

Isosafrole ND 

1.7 

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 

1.7 

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND 

1.7 

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 

1.7 

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 

1.7 


1.7 

Safrole ND 

1.7 

2-Chloronaphthalene ND 

1.7 


1.7 

2-Nitroaniline ND 

1.7 

1,4-Dinitrobenzene ND 

1.7 

Dimethylphthalate ND 

1.7 

1,3-Dinitrobenzene * ND 

1.7 

2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 

1.7 

Acenaphthylene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acenaphthene ND 

1.7 

2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 

5.6 


1.7 

Dibenzofuran ND 

1.7 


1.7 

Pentachlorobenzene ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 11 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



1-Naphthylamine ND 

1.7 


1.7 

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND 

1.7 

Diethylphthalate ND 

1.7 

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 

1.7 

Fluorene ND 

1.7 


1.7 

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 

5.6 

Diphenylamine ND 

1.7 

Azobenzene * ND 

1.7 

Phenacetin ND 

1.7 

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 

1.7 

Hexachlorobenzene ND 

1.7 

Pentachlorophenol ND 

1.7 

Pronamide ND 

1.7 

Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 

1.7 

Phenanthrene ND 

1.7 

Anthracene ND 

1.7 

Carbazole ND 

1.7 

4-Nitrobiphenyl ND 

1.7 

Di-n-butylphthalate ND 

1.7 

5-Nitroacenaphthene ND 

1.7 

Isodrin ND 

1.7 

Fluoranthene ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 12 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.7 

p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND 

1.7 

Butyl benzyl phthalate ND 

1.7 

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 

1.7 

Benzo(a)anthracene ND 

1.7 

Chrysene ND 

1.7 

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 

1.7 

Mestranol ND 

1.7 

Di-n-octylphthalate ND 

1.7 

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 

1.7 

7,12-Dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene ND 

1.7 

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 

1.7 

Benzo(a)pyrene ND 

1.7 

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 

1.7 

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND 

1.7 

Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 13 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 14 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 15 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 16 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.8 

2-Picoline ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Phenol ND 

1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 17 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Isophorone ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 18 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.8 

Isosafrole ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Safrole ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


6.0 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 19 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Fluorene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


6.0 


1.8 


1.8 

Phenacetin ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Pronamide ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Anthracene ND 

1.8 

Carbazole ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Isodrin ND 

1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 20 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:25 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Chrysene ND 

1.8 


1.8 

Mestranol ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 21 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: X107A MS/MSD 


Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J3 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

9.8 


2.0 


4.9 


J3 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


9.8 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 22 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J3, L 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 23 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: X107B 


Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone 18 

8.7 


1.7 


4.4 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


J5 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 24 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene 3.5 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


L 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 25 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

Hydrocarbon Identification by FID * 

Method: 

Hydrocarbon ID 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/g 



Hydrocarbons 

See Case Narrative 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 26 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone 13 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 27 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Tetrachloroethene 4.2 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 28 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: X117 


Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



alpha-BHC ND 

5.4 

beta-BHC ND 

5.4 

delta-BHC ND 

5.4 

gamma-BHC ND 

5.4 

Heptachlor ND 

5.4 

Aldrin ND 

5.4 


5.4 


5.4 

Dieldrin ND 

5.4 

p,p'-DDE ND 

5.4 

Endrin ND 

5.4 


5.4 

p,p'-DDD ND 

5.4 


5.4 

p,p'-DDT ND 

5.4 


27 


5.4 


5.4 


11 


11 

Toxaphene ND 

110 


11 


11 


11 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 29 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




11 


11 


11 


11 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone 18 

8.5 


1.7 


4.3 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 30 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




8.5 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


J5 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Trichloroethene 4.5 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


L 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 31 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/15/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

54 

2-Picoline ND 

54 


54 


54 

Phenol ND 

54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 32 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/15/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Isophorone ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 33 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/15/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 

Isosafrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


180 


54 


54 

Safrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


180 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 34 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/15/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Fluorene ND 

54 


54 


360 


54 


54 

Phenacetin ND 

54 


54 


54 


540 

Pronamide ND 

54 


54 

Phenanthrene 82 

54 

Anthracene ND 

54 

Carbazole ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 

Isodrin ND 

54 

Fluoranthene 170 

54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 35 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/15/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyrene 120 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Chrysene 61 

54 


180 

Mestranol ND 

54 


54 

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 54 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

PH 






Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 36 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 8.00 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 37 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: MW10 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 38 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

12/02/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Tetrachloroethene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 39 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.7 

2-Picoline ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Phenol ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Isophorone ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 40 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Isosafrole ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Safrole ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 41 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.7 


5.6 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Fluorene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


5.6 


1.7 


1.7 

Phenacetin ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Pronamide ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Anthracene ND 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 42 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

ug/L 



Carbazole ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Isodrin ND 

1.7 


1.7 

Pyrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Chrysene ND 

1.7 

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2.9 

1.7 

Mestranol ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 43 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 13:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Acetone ND 

9.1 


1.8 


4.6 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


9.1 


1.8 


1.8 

Chloroform ND 

1.8 


1.8 


J5 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Benzene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 44 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 13:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Toluene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Bromoform ND 

1.8 

Styrene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 45 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 13:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Acetone ND 

9.3 


1.9 


4.6 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

2-Butanone (MEK) * 11 

9.3 


1.9 


1.9 

Chloroform ND 

1.9 


1.9 


J5 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Benzene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 46 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 13:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Toluene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Bromoform ND 

1.9 

Styrene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 47 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil-- methanol 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/24/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




21000 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 48 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 


Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/24/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




190 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 49 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 


Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 10:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/24/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




170 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 50 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 


Collected By: 

MW 


11/19/08 11:35 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/24/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




190 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 51 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Notes and Definitions 

L 

J5 

J3 

J2 

ND 

NR 

Actual value not known, but known to be greater than value shown. To be used when the concentration of the analyte is above the 

acceptable level for quantitation. Value shown is the highest acceptable level for quantitation. 

Blank spike failed high, result was non-detect - impact on data may be minimal. 

The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy possibly due to matrix 

effects. 

Internal Standard criteria was not met. 

Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit 

Not Reported 

* Non-NELAP accredited 

S817728-03, -04: Insufficent sample volume received to perform a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate for Methods 8081 and 8082. 

Therefore, NELAC and method requirements were not met. 

S817728-02: Hydrocarbon Identification by FID- No significant hydrocarbon pattern detected. 

S817728-06 Hydrocarbon Identification by FID- No significant hydrocarbon pattern detected. 

Unable to perform pH analysis on samples: S817728-03, S817728-04 and S817728-09 due to entire sample volume consumed for 

pesticide and semi-volatile analysis. 

Method 8270 samples S817728-08 and -09: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the semivolatile analysis. Please 

contact the laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 

Method 8260 samples S817728-08, and S817728-11: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the volatile analysis. 

Please contact the laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 

Method 8260 samples S817728-12, -13, -14, and -15 : No matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate was performed for the analysis of these 

methanol extracts. NELAC and method requirements were not met. 

Report Authorized by: 




Reported: 

12/22/08 13:04 

Page 52 of 52




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 

Acetone 21 

J2, V 

9.0 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

4.5 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

9.0 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 

Chloroform ND 

J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 

Benzene ND 

J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 1 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 

Toluene ND 

J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 

Bromoform ND 

J1, J2 

1.8 

Styrene ND 

J1, J2 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 


J2, J1 

1.8 


J2, J1 

1.8 


J2, J1 

1.8 


J1, J2 

1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 2 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/09/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

59 

2-Picoline ND 

59 


59 


59 

Phenol ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Isophorone ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 3 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/09/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Isosafrole ND 

59 


59 


59 


200 


59 


59 

Safrole ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 4 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/09/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




59 


200 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Fluorene ND 

59 


59 


390 


59 


59 

Phenacetin ND 

59 


59 


59 


590 

Pronamide ND 

59 


59 


59 

Anthracene ND 

59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 5 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/09/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Carbazole ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 

Isodrin ND 

59 


59 

Pyrene ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Chrysene ND 

59 


200 

Mestranol ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 6 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 14:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 7.70 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 7 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



alpha-BHC ND 

5.9 

beta-BHC ND 

5.9 

delta-BHC ND 

5.9 

gamma-BHC ND 

5.9 

Heptachlor ND 

5.9 

Aldrin ND 

5.9 


5.9 


5.9 

Dieldrin ND 

5.9 

p,p'-DDE ND 

5.9 

Endrin ND 

5.9 


5.9 

p,p'-DDD ND 

5.9 


5.9 

p,p'-DDT ND 

5.9 


30 


5.9 


5.9 


12 


12 

Toxaphene ND 

120 


12 


12 


12 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 8 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




12 


12 


12 


12 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Acetone 13 

V 

9.4 


1.9 


4.7 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 9 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




9.4 


1.9 


1.9 

Chloroform ND 

1.9 


1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 

Benzene ND 

J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 


J2 

1.9 

Toluene ND 

J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 10 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 

Bromoform ND 

J2, J1 

1.9 

Styrene ND 

J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


J2, J1 

1.9 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

59 

2-Picoline ND 

59 


59 


59 

Phenol ND 

59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 11 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Isophorone ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 12 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




59 

Isosafrole ND 

59 


59 


59 


200 


59 


59 

Safrole ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


200 


59 


59 


59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 13 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Fluorene ND 

59 


59 


390 


59 


59 

Phenacetin ND 

59 


59 


59 


590 

Pronamide ND 

59 


59 


59 

Anthracene ND 

59 

Carbazole ND 

59 


59 

Di-n-butylphthalate 77 

V 

59 


59 

Isodrin ND 

59 


59 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 14 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyrene ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

Chrysene ND 

59 


200 

Mestranol ND 

59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 


59 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 






Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 15 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 16:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 7.70 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 16 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 17:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Acetone ND 

11 


2.2 


5.4 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


11 


2.2 


2.2 

Chloroform ND 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Benzene ND 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 17 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/17/08 17:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/26/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Toluene ND 

J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 

Bromoform ND 

J2 

2.2 

Styrene ND 

J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 


J2 

2.2 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 18 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 



V 

J2 

J1 

ND 

NR 

Indicates the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank and was outside method blank acceptance 

criteria. 


Surrogate compound recovery limits have not been met. 


Not Reported 


Method 8270 samples S817510 -01 and -02: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the semivolatile analysis. Please 


Method 8260 samples S817510-01, -02, and -03: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the volatile analysis. Please 






Reported: 

12/22/08 12:51 

Page 19 of 19




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Acetone ND 

11 


J3 

2.1 


5.4 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


11 


2.1 


2.1 

Chloroform ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Benzene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 1 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 9:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Toluene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Bromoform ND 

2.1 

Styrene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 2 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 9:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone 10 

8.5 


1.7 


4.2 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.5 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 3 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 9:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 4 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



alpha-BHC ND 

5.8 

beta-BHC ND 

5.8 

delta-BHC ND 

5.8 

gamma-BHC ND 

5.8 

Heptachlor ND 

5.8 

Aldrin ND 

5.8 


5.8 


5.8 

Dieldrin ND 

5.8 

p,p'-DDE ND 

5.8 

Endrin ND 

5.8 


5.8 

p,p'-DDD ND 

5.8 


5.8 

p,p'-DDT ND 

5.8 


29 


5.8 


5.8 


12 


12 

Toxaphene ND 

120 


12 


12 


12 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 5 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




12 


12 


12 


12 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Acetone ND 

9.7 


1.9 


4.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 6 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




9.7 


1.9 


1.9 

Chloroform ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Benzene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Toluene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 7 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Bromoform ND 

1.9 

Styrene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

58 

2-Picoline ND 

58 


58 


58 

Phenol ND 

58 


58 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 8 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 

Isophorone ND 

58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 9 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




58 

Isosafrole ND 

58 


58 


58 


200 


58 


58 

Safrole ND 

58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


200 


58 


58 


58 


58 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 10 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




58 


58 


58 


58 


58 

Fluorene ND 

58 


58 


380 


58 


58 

Phenacetin ND 

58 


58 


58 


580 

Pronamide ND 

58 


58 


58 

Anthracene ND 

58 

Carbazole ND 

58 


58 


V 

58 


58 

Isodrin ND 

58 


58 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 11 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyrene ND 

58 


58 


58 


58 


58 

Chrysene ND 

58 


200 

Mestranol ND 

58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 


58 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 






Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 12 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 7.60 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 13 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone ND 

8.5 


1.7 


4.2 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.5 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 14 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


L 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 15 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

55 

2-Picoline ND 

55 


55 


55 

Phenol ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Isophorone ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 16 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Isosafrole ND 

55 


55 


55 


190 


55 


55 

Safrole ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 17 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




55 


190 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Fluorene ND 

55 


55 


370 


55 


55 

Phenacetin ND 

55 


55 


55 


550 

Pronamide ND 

55 


55 


55 

Anthracene ND 

55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 18 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Carbazole ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 

Isodrin ND 

55 


55 

Pyrene ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Chrysene ND 

55 


190 

Mestranol ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 19 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 8.40 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 20 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



alpha-BHC ND 

5.4 

beta-BHC ND 

5.4 

delta-BHC ND 

5.4 

gamma-BHC ND 

5.4 

Heptachlor ND 

5.4 

Aldrin ND 

5.4 


5.4 


5.4 

Dieldrin ND 

5.4 

p,p'-DDE ND 

5.4 

Endrin ND 

5.4 


5.4 

p,p'-DDD ND 

5.4 


5.4 

p,p'-DDT ND 

5.4 


27 


5.4 


5.4 


11 


11 

Toxaphene ND 

110 


11 


11 


11 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 21 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




11 


11 


11 


11 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Acetone ND 

9.6 


1.9 


4.8 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 22 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




9.6 


1.9 


1.9 

Chloroform ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Benzene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Toluene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 23 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Bromoform ND 

1.9 

Styrene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

54 

2-Picoline ND 

54 


54 


54 

Phenol ND 

54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 24 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Isophorone 67 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 25 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 

Isosafrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


180 


54 


54 

Safrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


180 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 26 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Fluorene ND 

54 


54 


360 


54 


54 

Phenacetin ND 

54 


54 


54 


540 

Pronamide ND 

54 


54 


54 

Anthracene ND 

54 

Carbazole ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 

Isodrin ND 

54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 27 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyrene ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Chrysene ND 

54 


180 

Mestranol ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 






Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 28 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 8.70 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 29 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:10 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 

Acetone ND 

12 


2.4 


6.0 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


12 


2.4 


2.4 

Chloroform ND 

2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 

Benzene ND 

2.4 


2.4 


2.4 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 30 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:10 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 

Toluene ND 

2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 

Bromoform ND 

2.4 

Styrene ND 

2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 


2.4 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 31 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Acetone ND 

11 


2.1 


5.4 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


11 


2.1 


2.1 

Chloroform ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Benzene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 32 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:20 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Toluene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 

Bromoform ND 

2.1 

Styrene ND 

2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 


2.1 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 33 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Acetone ND 

8.9 


1.8 


4.5 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


8.9 


1.8 


1.8 

Chloroform ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Benzene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 34 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Toluene ND 

J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 

Bromoform ND 

J2 

1.8 

Styrene ND 

J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 


J2 

1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 35 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone ND 

8.7 


1.7 


4.4 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 36 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 11:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 

Bromoform ND 

J2 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 


J2 

1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 37 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 38 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 

Xylenes, total 2.1 

V 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 39 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



alpha-BHC ND 

6.4 

beta-BHC ND 

6.4 

delta-BHC ND 

6.4 

gamma-BHC ND 

6.4 

Heptachlor ND 

6.4 

Aldrin ND 

6.4 


6.4 


6.4 

Dieldrin ND 

6.4 

p,p'-DDE ND 

6.4 

Endrin ND 

6.4 


6.4 

p,p'-DDD ND 

6.4 


6.4 

p,p'-DDT ND 

6.4 


32 


6.4 


6.4 


13 


13 

Toxaphene ND 

130 


13 


13 


13 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 40 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

12/10/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




13 


13 


13 


13 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 

Acetone ND 

13 


2.6 


6.4 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 41 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




13 


2.6 


2.6 

Chloroform ND 

2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 

Benzene ND 

2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 

Toluene ND 

2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 42 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.6 


2.6 


2.6 

Bromoform ND 

2.6 

Styrene ND 

2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


2.6 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

64 

2-Picoline ND 

64 


64 


64 

Phenol ND 

64 


64 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 43 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 

Isophorone ND 

64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


J3 

64 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 44 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




J3 

64 

Isosafrole ND 

64 


64 


J3 

64 


220 


J3 

64 


64 

Safrole ND 

J3 

64 


J3 

64 


J3 

64 


J3 

64 


64 


J3 

64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


220 


64 


J3 

64 


64 


J3 

64 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 45 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




64 


64 


64 


J3 

64 


J3 

64 

Fluorene ND 

J3 

64 


64 


420 


64 


J3 

64 

Phenacetin ND 

64 


J3 

64 


J3 

64 


640 

Pronamide ND 

64 


64 


64 

Anthracene ND 

J3 

64 

Carbazole ND 

J3 

64 


64 


64 


64 

Isodrin ND 

64 


64 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 46 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyrene ND 

64 


64 


64 


64 


64 

Chrysene ND 

64 


220 

Mestranol ND 

64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 


64 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 






Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 47 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 7.60 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 48 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Acetone ND 

9.7 


1.9 


4.8 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


9.7 


1.9 


1.9 

Chloroform ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Benzene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 49 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Toluene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


L 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 

Bromoform ND 

1.9 

Styrene ND 

1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 


1.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 50 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

53 

2-Picoline ND 

53 


53 


53 

Phenol ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 

Isophorone ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 51 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 

Isosafrole ND 

53 


53 


53 


180 


53 


53 

Safrole ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 52 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




53 


180 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 

Fluorene ND 

53 


53 


350 


53 


53 

Phenacetin ND 

53 


53 


53 


530 

Pronamide ND 

53 


53 


53 

Anthracene ND 

53 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 53 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Carbazole ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 

Isodrin ND 

53 


53 

Pyrene ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 


53 

Chrysene ND 

53 


180 

Mestranol ND 

53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 


53 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 54 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 8.30 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 55 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone 15 

8.3 


1.7 


4.1 

Carbon disulfide 2.2 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.3 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 56 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Trichloroethene 16 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 57 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Acetone ND 

9.0 


1.8 


4.5 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


9.0 


1.8 


1.8 

Chloroform ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Benzene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 58 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:45 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Toluene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 

Bromoform ND 

1.8 

Styrene ND 

1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 


1.8 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 59 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Acetone ND 

8.5 


1.7 


4.3 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


8.5 


1.7 


1.7 

Chloroform ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Benzene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 60 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 12:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Toluene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 

Bromoform ND 

1.7 

Styrene ND 

1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 


1.7 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 61 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Acetone ND 

11 


2.2 


5.4 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


11 


2.2 


2.2 

Chloroform ND 

2.2 


2.2 


J5 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Benzene ND 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 62 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Toluene ND 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 

Bromoform ND 

2.2 

Styrene ND 

2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 


2.2 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 63 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

55 

2-Picoline ND 

55 


55 


55 

Phenol ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Isophorone 330 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 64 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Isosafrole ND 

55 


55 


55 


190 


55 


55 

Safrole ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 65 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




55 


190 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 

Fluorene ND 

55 


55 


360 


55 


55 

Phenacetin ND 

55 


55 


55 


550 

Pronamide ND 

55 


55 


55 

Anthracene ND 

55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 66 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Carbazole ND 

55 


55 


V 

55 


55 

Isodrin ND 

55 


55 

Pyrene ND 

55 


55 

Butyl benzyl phthalate 42000 

55 


55 


55 

Chrysene ND 

55 

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 6900 

190 

Mestranol ND 

55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 


55 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 67 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 14:55 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 10.5 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 68 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 69 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 70 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: VOC TRIP BLANK 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


11/18/08 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


J5 

2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 71 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: VOC TRIP BLANK 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


11/18/08 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/19/08 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 72 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 

Acetone ND 

15 


2.9 


7.3 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


15 


2.9 


2.9 

Chloroform ND 

2.9 


2.9 


J5 

2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 

Benzene ND 

2.9 


2.9 


2.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 73 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 

Toluene ND 

2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 

Bromoform ND 

2.9 

Styrene ND 

2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 


2.9 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 74 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Pyridine ND 

54 

2-Picoline ND 

54 


54 


54 

Phenol ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Isophorone ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 75 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Isosafrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


180 


54 


54 

Safrole ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 76 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




54 


180 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Fluorene ND 

54 


54 


350 


54 


54 

Phenacetin ND 

54 


54 


54 


540 

Pronamide ND 

54 


54 


54 

Anthracene ND 

54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 77 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

12/11/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 



Carbazole ND 

54 


54 


V 

54 


54 

Isodrin ND 

54 


54 

Pyrene ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 

Chrysene ND 

54 


180 

Mestranol ND 

54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 


54 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 78 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Soil 

Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 15:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

12/01/08 

Units: 

PH 



pH 8.20 

0.10 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 79 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 


Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




350 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 80 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 


Collected By: 

MW 


11/18/08 13:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

11/20/08 

Units: 

ug/kg dry 




190 




Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 81 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 



V 

L 

J5 

J3 

J2 

ND 

NR 


criteria. 

Actual value not known, but known to be greater than value shown. To be used when the concentration of the analyte is above the 

acceptable level for quantitation. Value shown is the highest acceptable level for quantitation. 



effects. 



Not Reported 


Method 8260 samples S817633-01, -02, -03, -04, -05,-06, -07, -08, -09, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15: Blank Spike was not run due to a 

laboratory error therefore the method and NELAC requirements were not met. The reported values are not affected by this omission. 

Method 8270 samples S817633-03, -04, -05, -11, -12, -16, and -19: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the 

semivolatile analysis. Please contact the laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 

Method 8260 sample S817633-13: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the volatile analysis. Please contact the 

laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 





Reported: 

12/22/08 12:53 

Page 82 of 82




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 1 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 2 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.0 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromodichloromethane 4.0 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Dibromochloromethane 4.3 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 3 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 4 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 5 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Safrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 6 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




J3, J5 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Fluorene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 

Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 7 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Chrysene ND 

1.5 


1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Cyanide by EPA Method 335.4 

Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 






Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 8 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 

Mercury by EPA Method 245.1 

Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury ND 

0.06 2 

Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods 

Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum 930 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic ND 

10.0 

Barium 44.9 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 269 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium ND 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 9 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Calcium 92400 

300 

Chromium ND 

5.00 

Cobalt ND 

10.0 

Copper ND 

10.0 

Iron 4420 

50.0 

Lead ND 

5.00 

Magnesium 46600 

300 

Manganese 112 

15.0 

Nickel ND 

5.00 


1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 158000 

300 

Strontium 138 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium ND 

5.00 

Zinc ND 

25.0 

Hardness 423000 

1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 10 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 8:50 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 



Laboratory pH 7.90 

0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 11 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: G103 FIELD BLANK 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 12 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 13 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 14 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 15 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 16 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform 4.8 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 17 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 18 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Safrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 19 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




J5 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Fluorene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 

Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 20 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Chrysene ND 

1.5 


1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 






Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 21 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 


Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury ND 

0.06 2 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum 94.9 

V 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic ND 

10.0 

Barium 41.6 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 292 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium ND 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 22 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Calcium 78800 

300 

Chromium ND 

5.00 

Cobalt ND 

10.0 

Copper ND 

10.0 

Iron 327 

50.0 

Lead ND 

5.00 


300 

Manganese 27.2 

15.0 

Nickel ND 

5.00 


1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 132000 

300 

Strontium 154 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium ND 

5.00 

Zinc ND 

25.0 


1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 23 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 10:15 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 




0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 24 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 25 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 26 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: G101 & G101 MS/MSD 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 27 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 28 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 29 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 30 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 31 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

5.0 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 

Safrole ND 

J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

5.0 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 32 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




J1, J5 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 

Fluorene ND 

J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 

Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 33 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 


J1 

1.5 

Chrysene ND 

J1 

1.5 


J1, V 

1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 






Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 34 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 


Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury ND 

0.06 2 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum 5580 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic ND 

10.0 

Barium 91.1 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 202 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium ND 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 35 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Calcium 192000 

300 

Chromium 12.4 

5.00 

Cobalt ND 

10.0 

Copper 20.1 

10.0 

Iron 16200 

50.0 

Lead 11.5 

5.00 


300 

Manganese 397 

15.0 

Nickel 17.1 

5.00 


1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 276000 

300 

Strontium 182 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium 11.9 

5.00 

Zinc 46.2 

25.0 


1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 36 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 




0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 37 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 38 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 39 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 40 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 41 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 42 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Safrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 43 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




J5 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Fluorene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 

Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 44 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Chrysene ND 

1.5 


1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 






Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 45 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 


Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury ND 

0.06 2 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum 6740 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic ND 

10.0 

Barium 92.8 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 196 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium ND 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 46 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




300 

Chromium 14.4 

5.00 

Cobalt ND 

10.0 

Copper 21.1 

10.0 

Iron 18100 

50.0 

Lead 10.1 

5.00 


300 

Manganese 386 

15.0 

Nickel 18.1 

5.00 


1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 259000 

300 

Strontium 180 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium 14.1 

5.00 

Zinc 52.9 

25.0 


1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 47 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 11:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 




0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 48 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 49 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 50 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: FB 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



alpha-BHC ND 

0.050 

beta-BHC ND 

0.050 

delta-BHC ND 

0.050 

gamma-BHC ND 

0.050 

Heptachlor ND 

0.050 

Aldrin ND 

0.050 


0.050 


0.050 

Dieldrin ND 

0.10 

p,p'-DDE ND 

0.10 

Endrin ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDD ND 

0.10 


0.10 

p,p'-DDT ND 

0.10 


1.0 


0.10 


0.10 


0.050 


0.050 

Toxaphene ND 

3.0 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 51 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8081/8082 

Analyzed: 

05/08/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


0.50 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 52 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 53 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 54 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 55 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Safrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 56 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




J5 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Fluorene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 

Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 57 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/11/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyrene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Chrysene ND 

1.5 


1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 






Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 58 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 


Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury ND 

0.06 2 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum ND 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic ND 

10.0 

Barium ND 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 13.4 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium ND 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 59 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Calcium ND 

300 

Chromium ND 

5.00 

Cobalt ND 

10.0 

Copper ND 

10.0 

Iron ND 

50.0 

Lead ND 

5.00 

Magnesium ND 

300 

Manganese ND 

15.0 

Nickel ND 

5.00 

Potassium ND 

1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 387 

300 

Strontium ND 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium ND 

5.00 

Zinc ND 

25.0 

Hardness ND 

1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 60 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 12:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 




0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 61 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: FB FIELD BLANK 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 62 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 


Client Sample ID: FB FIELD BLANK 


Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 63 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 64 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 65 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/12/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Pyridine ND 

1.5 

2-Picoline ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isophorone ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 66 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/12/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isosafrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Safrole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 67 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/12/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


J5 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Fluorene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


5.0 


1.5 


1.5 

Phenacetin ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


5.0 

Pronamide ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Anthracene ND 

1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 68 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8270 

Analyzed: 

05/12/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Carbazole ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Isodrin ND 

1.5 


1.5 

Pyrene ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 

Chrysene ND 

1.5 


V 

1.5 

Mestranol ND 

1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 


1.5 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 69 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 335.4 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

mg/L 



Cyanide ND 

0.005 0.2 


Method: 245.1 

Analyzed: 

05/18/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Mercury 0.10 

0.06 2 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 



Aluminum 20900 

60.0 

Antimony ND 

10.0 

Arsenic 60.0 

10.0 

Barium 145 

5.00 

Beryllium ND 

1.00 

Boron 111 

V 

10.0 

Cadmium 4.74 

3.00 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 70 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 6010 

Analyzed: 

05/19/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




300 

Chromium 60.1 

5.00 

Cobalt 36.4 

10.0 

Copper 120 

10.0 

Iron 130000 

50.0 

Lead 260 

5.00 


300 

Manganese 1110 

15.0 

Nickel 94.6 

5.00 


1400 

Selenium ND 

10.0 

Silver ND 

3.00 

Sodium 171000 

300 

Strontium 274 

5.00 

Thallium ND 

10.0 

Vanadium 56.1 

5.00 

Zinc 608 

25.0 


1980 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 71 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

MW 


05/05/09 13:30 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 

pH * 

Method: 150.1 

Analyzed: 

05/13/09 

Units: 

PH 




0.10 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 72 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Acetone ND 

10 


2.0 


5.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


2.0 


2.0 

Chloroform ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Benzene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 73 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 




Matrix: 

Water 

Collected By: 

NA 


05/05/09 0:00 

Sample Type: 

Sample Depth: 


Feet 


Method: 8260 

Analyzed: 

05/07/09 

Units: 

ug/L 




2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Toluene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 

Bromoform ND 

2.0 

Styrene ND 

2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 


2.0 




Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 74 of 75




Name: 




Funding Code: 

Trip ID: 

PR50 

Visit Number: 



V 

J5 

J3 

J1 

ND 

NR 


criteria. 



effects. 

Surrogate compound recovery limits have not been met. 


Not Reported 


S905483: Insufficient sample volume received to perform a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate for Method 8082. 

Method 8270; samples S905483-01, -03, -05, and -11: Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the semivolatile 

analysis. Please contact the laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 

Method 8260 samples S905483-01, S905483-05, S905483-07; Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were detected in the volatile 

analysis. Please contact the laboratory if additional information about the TICs is needed. 

Sample S905483-06 is a method 8260 field blank for which there is no sample. Therefore blank was not analyzed. 

Metals - S 905483-05, S 905483-07 - Due to elevated values for Calcium and Magnesium, sample values for Boron, Arsenic and 

Selenium may be bias low. 

Metals - S 905483-11 - Due to elevated values for Calcium, Magnesium Iron and Aluminum, sample values for Boron, Arsenic and 

Selenium may be bias low. 





Reported: 

06/01/09 14:42 

Page 75 of 75

APPENDIIX F 

PROTOCOLS

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROTOCOL 

Laboratory Analysis, Sample Custody, Shipment and Transfer Of Custody 

Pursuant to 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 740.415(d)(6), all quantitative analyses 

of samples collected will be completed by an accredited laboratory in accordance with 

the requirements of 35 IAC 186. 

Procedures to ensure the custody and integrity of the samples begin at the time of 

sampling and continue through transport, sample receipt, preparation, analysis and 

storage, data generation and reporting, and sample disposal. Records concerning the 

custody and condition of the samples are maintained in field and laboratory records. 

V3 will maintain chain-of-custody records for all field and QC samples. A sample is 

defined as being under a person's custody if any of the following conditions exist: (1) it is 

in their possession, (2) it is in their view, after being in their possession, (3) it was in their 

possession and they locked it up or, (4) it is in a designated secure area. If samples 

need to be out of the person’s sight, the coolers containing the samples should be 

sealed with COC seals during that time and stored in a locked room or vehicle, with 

sufficient ice to maintain the temperature. 

All samples require a sampling label. Analytical results received from the laboratory shall 

be documented according to the sample designator (number, location, etc.) which is 

indicated on the sampling jar by the sampler. Therefore, such designators shall be as 

meaningful and helpful as possible and standard designators shall be used when 

possible. 

All samples will be uniquely identified, labeled, and documented in the field at the time of 

collection. Samples collected in the field will be transported to the laboratory site as 

expeditiously as possible. The samples will be packed in ice to keep them cool during 

collection and transportation in order to maintain the temperature of the samples at 4°C 

± 2°C. If the temperature of the samples upon receipt exceeds the temperature 

requirements, the exceedance will be documented in laboratory records. 

Chain-of-Custody 

Proper sample chain-of-custody (COC) procedures are crucial to ensuring the quality 

and validity of data obtained through field and laboratory analyses. Protocol guidance is 

in accordance with ASTM D 4840-99 (Reapproved 2004): “Standard Guide for Sample 

Chain-of-Custody Procedures”. V3 field personnel are responsible for ensuring that 

COC procedures are followed. Field personnel will maintain custody of all samples until 

they are relinquished to another custodian, the laboratory, or to the freight shipper. All 

samples must be catalogued on a laboratory-supplied COC form using sample 

identification codes. Both sample labels and COC forms should be filled out with all 

pertinent information. COC forms should correspond exactly with the samples included 

in the shipment. 

An indelible ink, paint, or crayon should be used to enter information on the COC. The 

date and time of collection will be recorded on the form, as well as the number of each 

type of sample, the method of preservation, and the type of analysis. COC forms should 

include the project number and laboratory quote number, as applicable. This form also 

documents unusual conditions, which might be meaningful to the lab. For example, if a

sample is possibly hot, this should be noted on the COC, to alert lab personnel in 

handling the sample. COC forms are included in the appendices of reports, and 

therefore shall have as professional an appearance as possible. 

Samples will be packaged and transported in a manner that maintains the integrity of the 

sample and permits the analysis to be performed within the prescribed holding time. 

Prior to shipment, each sample container will be inspected for a label with the proper 

sample identification code. 

Samples will be either hand-delivered or shipped via overnight mail to the laboratory, or 

picked-up by a laboratory representative. The COC forms will be sealed in a plastic bag 

and transported inside the sample cooler. In addition, any shipping receipts will be 

incorporated into the COC documentation. Samples will be packed in the cooler using 

bubble-wrap packing materials. Any samples suspected of being highly contaminated 

will additionally be sealed in Ziploc ® -type bag. The cooler will be taped closed using 

custody seals provided by the laboratory to prevent tampering during transport. Upon 

relinquishing the sample cooler, V3 field personnel will sign custody of the samples over 

with the time and date at the bottom of the COC form. V3 will retain one copy of the 

COC documentation and the laboratory will retain a second copy. 

COC labels and forms provide immediate and necessary information for the processing 

of samples by the laboratory, and establish historic documentation of the sampling 

endeavor and tracking of samples, enabling defense of analytical data in a court of law. 

The COC form serves as a link to the information provided on the sample labels, and 

gives the lab overall information on the sample shipment (number of samples sent, 

number of sampling containers, date, time, and other pertinent information). If 

discrepancies are noted, these can be resolved early, when memories are still clear. 

Visual observations or specific data on sampling locations or intervals may also be 

helpful in future review of data.

DECONTAMINATION ACTIVITIES PROTOCOL 

Decontamination procedures will be employed to prevent cross contamination during the 

collection of samples. Equipment that will be used to sample soils, surface water and 

groundwater (i.e., split spoons, bailers, water level indicators, and the like) will be 

decontaminated prior to use by using the following procedures: 

• Scrub the equipment with a brush and a Liquinox® solution, 

• Rinse the equipment once with distilled water, 

• Air dry the equipment, and 

• Wrap the equipment in plastic while not being used. 

New disposable sampling gloves will be donned each time a sample is collected and 

during the handling of sampling equipment. Soil probe equipment will be washed with a 

Liquinox® wash and a distilled water rinse, or will be steam cleaned prior to each use. 

In addition, new, unused polybutyrate liners will be used in the macro core sampler prior 

to sample collection. 

\\ilch-itfs01\V3il_Chi\ADMIN\STD OPERATING PROCEDURES\SOPs Source Docs\5.0 Data Gen and Acq\5.1 Field 

SOPs\Protocols\Decontamination Activities Protocol.doc

DIRECT PUSH DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING 

PROTOCOL 

Soil samples will be collected at continuous intervals using a 4-foot or 5-foot macro core 

with a polybutyrate lining to the terminal depth of each soil probe. New disposable 

sampling gloves will be donned for each sample collected and during handling of 

sampling equipment. A photoionization detector (PID) will be used to monitor worker air 

quality at all sampling locations and screen soils for possible contaminants using the 

headspace technique. The PID will be equipped with a 10.2 electron volt lamp, unless 

otherwise specified, and calibrated daily to a 100 parts per million (ppm) isobutylene to 

air standard. The headspace technique involves placing a representative portion of each 

sample in a Ziploc® quart-sized bag, agitating the sample, and sealing the bag. After 

sealing the bag, the sample is allowed to warm for ten minutes. The probe of the PID is 

then inserted through the bag and the maximum reading over a 15-second period is 

recorded in the field book. 

Soil samples that are collected for laboratory analysis will be placed in appropriate 

sample containers in order of decreasing volatility. For each recovered soil sample, 

samples for possible VOC analysis will be immediately collected directly from the 

recovered sample, in accordance with USEPA SW-846 Method 5035/8260. Laboratory 

provided pre-weighed vials containing the correct amount of preservatives will be used 

(10 ml of methanol per vial and a 20% solution of sodium bisulfate (1 gram of sodium 

bisulfate to 5 ml of water). All samples collected for VOCs will be obtained directly from 

the recovered sampler at the specified sample interval using a disposable plastic premeasured 

5-gram syringe barrel provided by the laboratory. The barrel will be driven into 

the soil surface to remove the soil without exposure to air. The soil will then be extruded 

into one 40-ml vial preserved with methanol. The threads of the sample vial should be 

cleaned prior to capping. This process will be repeated until two 40-ml vials preserved 

with sodium bisulfate are also filled with 5-grams of soil each. One four ounce jar or 

smaller will then be filled with soil for dry weight analysis. The samples will be 

immediately capped, labeled, and placed on ice. For all additional analysis, the 

remaining portion of the recovered sample from the specified sample interval will be 

placed into appropriate laboratory specified jars, labeled with the sample name, sample 

location, sample depth (if appropriate), date, time, preservative (if appropriate), and name 

of sampler. All samples will be immediately placed in a cooler filled with ice. 

Following completion of drilling and soil sampling, soil cuttings with gross impacts will be 

containerized in clean Department of Transportation (DOT) 17-H rated 55-gallon drums, 

unless otherwise indicated and the boring will be backfilled with bentonite. 

A V3 geologist or engineer will log the subsurface conditions encountered using the 

Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM Method D2488), with color descriptions 

made using a Munsell Color Chart. Additional information that will be documented 

includes: 





SOPs\Protocols\Drilling & Soil Sampling Protocols\direct push drilling and soil sampling.doc






• Refusal 

Disposable sampling equipment will be used to the extent possible; however, all reusable 

equipment that may directly or indirectly contact samples will be decontaminated prior to 

each use. 

The direct push sampling technique can also be used to collect groundwater samples, by 

driving a temporary vertically slotted screen to the groundwater sampling interval. The 

groundwater is then collected by inserting Teflon tubing to the end of the screen and 

attaching the upper end to a peristaltic pump. The water is purged and allowed to 

recharge, if necessary. Temperature, pH and specific conductivity or TDS will be 

measured after each well volume is removed. Development will continue until these 

parameters have stabilized within the following criteria for three consecutive readings 

within + 10 % of previous readings for temperature and TDS, + 0.1 unit for pH, and +3% 

for specific conductance. If these criteria have not been attained after 2 hours, 

development activities will be suspended, the well will be considered “developed” and 

water samples will be collected. The water is then immediately transferred into 

appropriate sampling containers and placed on ice until it can be analyzed.

HAND AUGER SOIL SAMPLING PROTOCOLS 

Soil samples will be collected in laboratory-clean glass sample jars, and labeled with the 

designation, location, date and sampler. Collected samples will be preserved on ice and 

picked up by the analytical laboratory. V3 standard chain-of-custody procedures will be 

followed regarding the shipment and receipt of samples. 

A hand auger will be used at the Site, to provide for visual observation of subsurface 

conditions, and the collection of soil samples at depth. The materials will be returned to 

the “hole” in the same manner as removed. 

Collected soil samples are visually classified in the field by Site engineer or geologist, in 

accordance with ASTM D 2488-84. Sample lithology is recorded using the Unified Soil 

Classification System. Soil logs, documenting soil types and subsurface conditions, will 

be completed by V3’s Site engineer or geologist. 

During sampling activities, soils will be screened for the presence of volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID). VOCs are common 

components of a variety of environmental contaminants, including industrial solvents, 

petroleum products and a wide range of other industrial compounds. The PID is also 

used to monitor ambient air concentrations within the work zone during the sampling, in 

accordance with V3’s Site Safety Plan. Personal protective equipment is utilized by 

sampling personnel during sampling, as specified in the Site Safety Plan. 

Soil samples that are collected for laboratory analysis will be placed in appropriate 

sample containers in order of decreasing volatility. For each recovered soil sample, 

samples for possible VOC analysis will be collected directly from the recovered sample, 

in accordance with USEPA SW-846 Method 5035/8260. Laboratory provided preweighed 

vials containing the correct amount of preservatives will be used (10 ml of 

methanol per vial and a 20% solution of sodium bisulfate (1 gram of sodium bisulfate to 

5 ml of water). All samples collected for VOCs will be obtained directly from the 

recovered sampler at the specified sample interval using a disposable plastic premeasured 

5-gram syringe barrel provided by the laboratory. The barrel will be driven 

into the soil surface to remove the soil without exposure to air. The soil will then be 

extruded into one 40-ml vial preserved with methanol. The threads of the sample vial 

should be cleaned prior to capping. This process will be repeated until two 40-ml vials 

preserved with sodium bisulfate are also filled with 5-grams of soil each. One four ounce 

jar or smaller will then be filled with soil for dry weight analysis. The samples will be 

immediately capped, labeled, and placed on ice. For all additional analysis, the 

remaining portion of the recovered sample from the specified sample interval will be 

homogenized and placed into appropriate laboratory specified jars. For all additional 

analysis, the remaining portion of the recovered sample from the specified sample 

interval will be placed into appropriate laboratory specified jars, labeled with the sample 

name, sample location, sample depth (if appropriate), date, time, preservative (if 

appropriate), and name of sampler. All samples will be immediately placed in a cooler 

filled with ice. 

To avoid cross-contamination, the hand auger will be cleaned between sampling 

locations, and soil residue is removed during this procedure. Sampling equipment used 


SOPs\Protocols\Drilling & Soil Sampling Protocols\Hand Auger Soil Sampling Protocols.doc

to collect the soil sample from the auger will be decontaminated between samples using 

a soap and water wash followed by a distilled water rinse. 


SOPs\Protocols\Drilling & Soil Sampling Protocols\Hand Auger Soil Sampling Protocols.doc

GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION 

AND DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOLS 

Monitoring Well Construction 

Hollow stem augers (HSAs) will be used to advance borings for well construction. The 

monitoring well will be constructed with 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride 

(PVC) riser pipe and 10-feet long, 10 slot, Schedule 40 PVC screen. The final design of 

the well will be determined in the field. The screen length will allow for fluctuation in the 

local water table and enable collection of groundwater samples representative of the 

shallow saturated zone. 

The filter pack sand will extend approximately 2 feet above the top of screen. The 

thickness of the filter pack sand will be determined by the relationship between the water 

table and the top of screen to the ground surface. If the water table is near the surface in 

the well, the filter pack thickness may have to be reduced to ensure that a minimum 2- 

foot thick annular seal can be installed above the filter pack. Filter pack material will be 

selected that will impede fine-grained soils from entering the well. 

The annular space seal will consist of bentonite slurry and (or) bentonite pellets and will 

be a minimum of 2-feet thick. The well will have either a flush-mounted or 3-foot stick up 

well protector, and a 3-foot by 3-foot concrete pad installed at ground surface. 

Monitoring Well Development 

The well will be developed no sooner than 24 hours after installation to allow for grout 

curing. Development will consist of mechanical surging and bailing until little or no 

sediment enters the well. This will continue for a maximum of 2 hours. Sediment that 

enters the well during the process will be removed. After surging and bailing, the well will 

be pumped using a submersible pump. Temperature, pH, specific conductance, 

oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and turbidity will be measured after each well volume 

is removed. Development will continue until these parameters have stabilized within the 

following ranges for three consecutive readings: + 0.1 unit for pH, and + 3% for specific 

conductance, + 20 mV for ORP, and + 10% for turbidity and temperature. If these criteria 

have not been attained after 2 hours, development activities will be suspended, the well 

will be considered “developed” and water samples will be collected. 


SOPs\Protocols\Groundwater Well Installation & Sampling\GW monitoring well installation and development.doc

TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND 

DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOLS 

The temporary groundwater monitoring wells will be installed by utilizing Geoprobe ® 

direct push technology to advance borings for sample collection and well construction. 

Following the soil sample recovery, monitoring well construction will be completed by 

driving a temporary Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) riser pipe and 10-slot vertically 

slotted Schedule 40 PVC 10-foot screen and riser to the groundwater-sampling interval. 

The final design of the well will be determined in the field. The wells will be constructed 

with a silica sand filter pack and purged prior to collection of the groundwater sample. 

The temporary monitoring wells will be installed to a pre-determined depth or based on 

field soil conditions observed during drilling. Prior to groundwater sampling, one round 

of static water level measurements will be taken from the monitoring wells prior to 

commencing any purging and sampling activities. All measurements will be taken using 

an electric water level indicator. Prior to sampling activities, the monitoring well will be 

purged a minimum of three well casing volumes using a polyethylene bailer or peristaltic 

pump to ensure the subsequent sample is from within the formations water. If using a 

peristaltic pump, groundwater will be purged from the wells by inserting polyethylene 

tubing to the end of the screen and attaching the upper end to a peristaltic pump. 

Groundwater samples obtained with either a disposal bailer or by micro-purging the 

monitoring well at a rate of 0.1 gallon per minute (gpm) with a peristaltic pump. The 

water will be purged and allowed to recharge, if necessary, until little or no sediment 

entered the monitoring well. 

The water will then be immediately transferred into appropriate laboratory-provided 

sampling containers. Sample bottles will be filled slowly, avoiding unnecessary 

agitation. If sampling for VOCs with a bailer, attach the VOC sampling tip to the bottom 

of the bailer before filling vials. Groundwater samples are collected in the following 

order: VOCs, SVOCs/PNAs, and then TAL metals. The samples are not filtered unless 

specifically requested for dissolved metals. After filling each VOC sample bottle, the cap 

will be securely tightened and the bottle will be inverted and tapped firmly. If an air 

bubble is observed, the bottle will be discarded and a new sample will be obtained. 

Properly filled sample bottles will be labeled and immediately placed in a secure, iced 

cooler. 

The samples will be collected in appropriate laboratory supplied containers, preservative 

added depending on the analysis, cooled to 4°C, packed and hand delivered to the 

analytical laboratory. All containers will be furnished by the analytical laboratory 

according to USEPA protocols. Field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples 

(equipment blanks, trip blanks, and field duplicates) will be collected at the frequency 

specified in the Field Quality Control Samples SOP, Sampling and Analysis Table or as 

otherwise specified.

Page 1 of 2 

LOW-FLOW GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROTOCOLS 

A static water level measurement will be taken prior to commencing any purging and 

sampling activities. The groundwater level will be measured using an electric water level 

indicator. The depth to water will be measured from a datum marked on the rim of the 

riser pipe to an accuracy of +0.01 feet. The static water level measurements will be 

recorded in the field logbook. 

A micro-purge low-flow method will be used for well purging prior to sampling. This 

method is used to provide for representative samples while minimizing purge water and 

minimizing disturbance of sediment in the well that may be caused by over-pumping. 

The procedure to be used is as follows: 

• Prevent decontaminated equipment from contacting the ground surface by using 

new plastic sheeting or by placing tubing/pumps in clean storage tubs. 

• Slowly lower the decontaminated pump into the well until the pump intake is in 

the middle of the screen interval. Measurement of the water level in the well is 

needed prior to well purging. The pump tubing will be clearly marked with depth 

increments to facilitate accurate determinations of pump depth. 

• Secure the tubing to the wellhead when the pump is at the desired depth. 

• The dedicated polyethylene lined tubing will be secured so purging will take place 

from the approximate midpoint of the monitoring well screen. 

• Turn pump on and slowly increase to a flow rate of 100 ml to 500 ml per minute, 

and discharge directly into bucket until turbidity has decreased. Check water 

level periodically to monitor drawdown in the well as a guide to flow rate 

adjustment. The goal is minimal drawdown (

Page 2 of 2 

Purging will be performed at a rate to minimize drawdown and to minimize the risk of the 

well going dry during purging. If the well does go dry during purging, samples will be 

collected after sufficient groundwater enters the well. 

Upon stabilization of field parameters during well purging, samples will be collected 

directly from the pump discharge. Samples will be collected in order of decreasing 

volatility: such that if analyses include VOCs, then a sample will be collected first for 

VOCs analysis (containers include preservatives). Field quality assurance/quality 

control (QA/QC) samples (equipment blanks, trip blanks, and field duplicates) will be 

collected at the frequency specified in the Field Quality Control Samples SOP or as 

otherwise specified. 

The samples will be collected in appropriate laboratory supplied containers, preservative 

added depending on the analysis, cooled to 4°C, packed and hand delivered to the 

analytical laboratory. All containers will be furnished by the analytical laboratory 

according to US EPA protocols. 


SOPs\Protocols\Groundwater Well Installation & Sampling\Low-flow GW Sampling Protocol.doc

comprehensive site investigation and remediation objectives report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?