16.06.2014 Views

Review of the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Single ...

Review of the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Single ...

Review of the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Single ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.0 Conclusions<br />

This section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report sets out <strong>the</strong> conclusions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review team in<br />

relation to each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference.<br />

To describe <strong>the</strong> current position in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carer’s Support and<br />

Needs Assessment component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Ireland</strong> <strong>Single</strong><br />

Assessment Tool (NISAT) within <strong>the</strong> Older People’s Programme <strong>of</strong> Care.<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review team indicated that <strong>the</strong> Carer‟s Support and Needs<br />

Assessment component <strong>of</strong> NISAT is in use across all trusts within <strong>the</strong> older<br />

people‟s programme <strong>of</strong> care.<br />

All trusts have identified board members with a specific responsibility for<br />

carers‟ issues. All trusts had a written policy in place for promoting carer<br />

involvement and had in place a Carers‟ Steering Group, Carers‟ Reference<br />

Group or a Carers‟ Forum. The review team emphasised <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

trusts being able to demonstrate <strong>the</strong> carers‟ contribution to <strong>the</strong> planning<br />

design and delivery <strong>of</strong> services. Having an update on carers‟ issues as a<br />

standing board agenda item would send a strong message to carers about <strong>the</strong><br />

importance attributed by <strong>the</strong> trust to <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> carers‟ strategy.<br />

All trusts had involved carers in <strong>the</strong> planning, commissioning and review <strong>of</strong><br />

services but faced challenges ensuring that representation is from a diverse<br />

range <strong>of</strong> backgrounds and caring experiences. The review team considered<br />

that trusts were actively trying to engage with carers in <strong>the</strong> planning and<br />

design <strong>of</strong> services. However fur<strong>the</strong>r work is required to be carried out in <strong>the</strong><br />

area <strong>of</strong> satisfaction surveys, in order to ascertain <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> carers<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> services being provided for <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

All trusts had appointed carers‟ coordinators and <strong>the</strong> review team felt that this<br />

was a positive step. The establishment <strong>of</strong> a regional carers‟ coordinators<br />

network would help to standardise information and services provided for<br />

carers, and would be a fur<strong>the</strong>r step forward.<br />

Trusts all indicated <strong>the</strong>y had processes in place to ensure that carers‟<br />

independence and choices were respected, and to ensure <strong>the</strong> early<br />

identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> carers. However, a significant number <strong>of</strong><br />

carers refused an assessment and it was unclear to <strong>the</strong> review team if fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

follow up <strong>of</strong> this cohort had been carried out. It was also evident that some<br />

carers did not fully understand <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> an assessment. Trusts must<br />

present information to carers more clearly to ensure that, where possible, all<br />

carers understand <strong>the</strong> need for and receive an assessment.<br />

The review team found that information in relation to carer‟s assessments is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten contained in <strong>the</strong> same file as <strong>the</strong> cared for person‟s details. It is difficult<br />

manually to accurately separate <strong>the</strong> specific needs <strong>of</strong> carers and provide<br />

information clearly for planning, and commissioning purposes.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!