18.06.2014 Views

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

IWMP-3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report<br />

Cluster-<strong>IWMP</strong>: III (Panchavda)<br />

(Kharachiya (Jam), Panchavda, Jangvad, Jasapar)<br />

( Ha. 4239.30, Cost Rs. 635.90 Lac )<br />

Year :- 2009-10<br />

PIA : D. W. D. U. – Rajkot<br />

D.L.N.A. : District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit – Rajkot<br />

(S.L.N.A. – G.S.W.M.A. – Gandhinagar)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 1


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Chapter 1 Project Background 11<br />

1.1 Project Background 12<br />

Table no. 1: Basic project information 12<br />

1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme 13<br />

Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project 13<br />

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed 14 to 15<br />

Table no. 3: Watershed information 15<br />

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages 16<br />

Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area: 17 to 18<br />

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area: 19<br />

Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency 20<br />

2.1 Project Implementing Agency 21<br />

2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot. 21<br />

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 21<br />

2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the distric 22<br />

2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU 23<br />

Table no. 6: PIA: 24<br />

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 24<br />

Chapter 3 Basic Information <strong>of</strong> the Project Area 25<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 2


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 26<br />

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 26<br />

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 26<br />

3.1.2 Soil and topography 26<br />

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography 27<br />

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition 27<br />

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion 28<br />

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 28<br />

Table: 12. Climatic Conditions(Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> Jasdan taluk 28<br />

3.1.3 Slope 29<br />

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 29<br />

3.2 Land and Agriculture 30<br />

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 30<br />

Table no. 15: Agriculture 30<br />

3.2.1 Irrigation 31<br />

Table no. 16: Irrigation 31<br />

Table no. 17: Crop details 32 to 33<br />

3.3 Livestock 33<br />

Table no. 18: Livestock 34<br />

Table no. 19: Drinking water 34<br />

Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources 35<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 3


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile 35<br />

3.5.1 Demographic Status 35<br />

Table no. 21: Demographic information 36<br />

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 36<br />

3.5.2 Migration Pattern 36<br />

Table no. 23: Migration details 37<br />

Table no. 24: Poverty 37<br />

3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities 37<br />

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 38<br />

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 38<br />

3.5.4 Livelihood pattern 38<br />

Table no. 27: Per capita Income 39<br />

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 39<br />

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 39<br />

Chapter 4 Watershed Activities 40<br />

Watershed Activities 41<br />

4.1. Scientific Planning 41 to 47<br />

Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects 48 to 49<br />

4.2. Institution Building 49<br />

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details (Kharachiya Jam ) 50<br />

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Panchvada) 51<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 4


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Jagavad) 52<br />

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details (Jasapar) 53<br />

ii) Self Help Group 54<br />

Table no. 32: SHG detail 54<br />

iii) User Group: 55<br />

Table No. 33: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed 55<br />

Table no. 33.1 : UG detail (Kharchiya Jam) 56<br />

Table no. 33.2: UG detail (Panchavada) 56<br />

Table no. 33.3 : UG detail (Jangavad) 57<br />

Table no. 33. 4: UG detail (Jasapar) 57<br />

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 58<br />

Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kharachiya Jam are: 58<br />

Table No. 34.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Panchavda are: 59<br />

Table No. 34.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jangvad are: 60<br />

Table No. 34.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jasapar are: 61<br />

Table no.35: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 62<br />

4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works: 62<br />

4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans 62<br />

1. Contour Bunds/Trench 63<br />

2. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks 63<br />

3. Gabions 64<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 5


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development: 65<br />

1. Check dams 65<br />

2. Waste weirs 65<br />

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level: 66<br />

1) Farm Pond: 66<br />

2) Irrigation/Percolation tank 66 to 67<br />

3) Farm bund 67<br />

4. Afforestation 67<br />

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in Kharachiya Jam (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 68<br />

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Panchavda (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 68<br />

Table no.36.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jangavad (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 69<br />

Table no.36.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jasapar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 69<br />

Table no.36.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in cluster <strong>IWMP</strong>-III (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 70<br />

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh 71<br />

Rs.)<br />

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 72 to 73<br />

Table no. 39: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target 74<br />

Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Kharachiya (Jam) 74<br />

Table no. 40.i: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Panchavada 75<br />

Table no. 40.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jangvad 76<br />

Table no. 40.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jasapar 77<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 6


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.1: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench 78<br />

Table No 40.2: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks 78 to 80<br />

Table No 40.3: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures 81 to 82<br />

Table No 40.4: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 83<br />

Table No 40.5. Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Excavation <strong>of</strong> Trench and raising embankment 84<br />

Table no 40.5.i, Quantity Calculation <strong>of</strong> trench and refilling 84<br />

Table No 40.6 Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond 84<br />

Table no 40.7. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Percolation Tank 85<br />

Table no 40.8. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam 86 to 87<br />

Table no 40.9. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam 88 to 89<br />

Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kharachiya Jam 90<br />

Table no.41.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Panchavda 91<br />

Table no.41.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jangvad 92<br />

Table no.41.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jasapar 93<br />

Table No, 41.i, Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities 94<br />

Table No, 41.ii , Cost Estimation for afforestation activity 94 to 95<br />

Table No, 41.iii: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Bio-gas 96 to 101<br />

Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Kharachiya Jam 102<br />

Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities:Panchvda 103 to 104<br />

Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jangvad 105<br />

Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jasapar 106<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 7


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Livelihood Intervention 107 to 109<br />

Production System-1: Papad production units 109<br />

Introduction 109 to 114<br />

Production System-2: Dairy Buffalo Farming 114 to 117<br />

Production System-3: Fodder bank for Watershed villages 117 to 119<br />

Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank 120<br />

Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production 121<br />

Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details 121 to 125<br />

Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt) 126<br />

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting 127 to 128<br />

Production System – 6 Khadi based industries 128 to 130<br />

Production System – 7: Turmeric Cultivation 131<br />

Table No-42.vi: Economics <strong>of</strong> turmeric cultivation in 1ha. Area 131 to 132<br />

Production System – 7: Floriculture 133<br />

Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation 134 to 137<br />

Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities 138 to 141<br />

Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare 141<br />

Table no.43: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas 142 to 143<br />

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration 143<br />

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building 144<br />

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan 145<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 8


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities 145<br />

Chapter 5 Budgeting 146<br />

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance 147<br />

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong> 148<br />

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 148<br />

Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes 149<br />

Chapter 6 Expected Outcome 150<br />

6.1.1 Employment 151<br />

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area 151<br />

6.1.2 Migration 151<br />

Table no. 53: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area 152<br />

6.1.3 Ground water table 152<br />

Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 152<br />

6.1.4: Drinking water 153<br />

Table no. 55: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water 153<br />

6.1. 5: Crops 153<br />

Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas 154<br />

6.1.6 Horticulture 154<br />

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture 154<br />

6.1.7 Vegetative cover 155<br />

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 155<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 9


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.8 Livestock 155<br />

Table no. 59: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, solids in kg and income in 155<br />

Rs.)<br />

Linkages 156<br />

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 156 to 157<br />

Logical Framework Analysis 158 to 162<br />

Chapter 7 Quality and Sustainability Lssus 163<br />

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 164<br />

Vigilance and Monitoring Committees 165<br />

Research support in watershed management 165<br />

Farmer organization and empowerment 165 to 166<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge 166<br />

Plans For Project management: 167<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund: 167<br />

Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund(WDF) 167<br />

User Charges: 168<br />

Chapter 8 Mapping 169<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 10


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 1<br />

PROJECT BACKGROUND<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 11


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.1 Project Background<br />

The milliwatershed consists <strong>of</strong> four villages namely, Kharachiya jam, Panchavda, Jangavad and Jasapar under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

cluster which are located in Jasdan Taluka <strong>of</strong> Rajkot District in <strong>Gujarat</strong> state. The project is a cluster <strong>of</strong> 13 micro watersheds with<br />

5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a, 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9d3b, 5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9c1g,<br />

5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c as micro watershed codes. The total project area <strong>of</strong> the watershed is about 6739.30 ha, out <strong>of</strong> which 4239.30 ha is<br />

proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (<strong>IWMP</strong>).<br />

The nearest town is Jasdan which is about 20 km from the project area and well connected by pucca road. In the watershed villages<br />

Patel, Darbar, Rabari, Koli, Bharvad, Muslims and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the village. The villagers mainly<br />

depend upon agriculture or working in diamond polishing shops, Handicraft and thresher industries in Jasdan town. The Rabari and<br />

Bharvad community mainly depends upon dairying. Agriculture is totally dependent on rain. There are 1432 Well and 546 Bore wells, Out<br />

<strong>of</strong> them 571 well and 213 Bore wells found totally dry and 841 wells and 333 Bore wells are used for partially irrigation in the project area.<br />

Drinking water mainly comes from the Narmda Pipeline and other wells/ borewells. Horticultural plants and afforestation plants planted<br />

under hariyali project and by organization BAIF increase the beauty <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> villages. The visible trees in the farmlands are Neem,<br />

Babool, Bor, Pipar, Pipal, Lemon and Vad.<br />

Table no. 1: Basic project information<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

the project Name Census<br />

code<br />

Gram<br />

Panchayats<br />

Taluka District Area <strong>of</strong><br />

the<br />

project<br />

Area<br />

proposed<br />

to be<br />

treated<br />

Total<br />

project<br />

cost (Rs.<br />

in lakh)<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III Kharachiya(Jam) 00675400 Kharachiya(Jam) Jasdan Rajkot 1036.40 536.40 80.46<br />

2 Panchavda 00677200 Panchavda 2090.10 1090.10 163.52<br />

3 Jangavad 00677100 Jangavad 1988.20 1488.20 223.23<br />

4 Jasapar 00677300 Jasapar 1624.60 1124.60 168.69<br />

Total<br />

6739.30 4239.30 635.90<br />

PIA<br />

DWDU<br />

Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 12


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.2 Need <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Programme is selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage <strong>of</strong> SC/ST,<br />

Actual wages, Percentage <strong>of</strong> small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking<br />

water situation in the area, Percentage <strong>of</strong> degraded land, Productivity potential <strong>of</strong> land, Continuity <strong>of</strong> another watershed that has already<br />

developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking has been given to the<br />

watershed project as given in Table no. 3.<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> families under BPL is 72, which is less than 24 per cent <strong>of</strong> total households <strong>of</strong> the village. Hence a score <strong>of</strong> 5 is<br />

allotted. The percentage <strong>of</strong> schedule castes in the cluster villages are less than 20 per cent to the total population; hence a score <strong>of</strong> 3 is<br />

allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation <strong>of</strong> the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for<br />

usage. Less than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the<br />

minimum wages hence a composite rank <strong>of</strong> 5, 3 and. 5 are allotted respectively.<br />

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking<br />

water is problematic in the village as low percolation into soil. Majority <strong>of</strong> land is degraded due to uneven level <strong>of</strong> land low percolation<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> water inside the soil The soil is very permeable and production <strong>of</strong> the land can be significantly enriched with the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

timely irrigation. The 13 watersheds in the project cover a total area <strong>of</strong> 4239.30 Ha. Thus a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 104.All the parameters<br />

were taken together to give a cumulative score <strong>of</strong> 104 to the watershed.<br />

Table no. 2: Weightage <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

Project name Project<br />

Weightage<br />

type<br />

i ii iii iv V vi vii viii ix X xi xii Xiii<br />

<strong>IWMP</strong>-III Desert 5 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 10 10 10 15 5<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 13


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />

S.<br />

No<br />

Criteria<br />

Maxi<br />

mum<br />

Ranges & scores<br />

score<br />

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20<br />

% (2.5)<br />

i Poverty index (% <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

to population)<br />

ii % <strong>of</strong> SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)<br />

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are<br />

Actual wages are<br />

significantly lower than equal to or higher<br />

minimum wages (5) than minimum wages<br />

(0)<br />

iv % <strong>of</strong> small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)<br />

farmers<br />

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)<br />

vi Moisture index/<br />

DPAP/ DDP Block<br />

15 -66.7 & below (15)<br />

DDP Block<br />

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)<br />

DPAP Block<br />

0 to -33.2 (0)<br />

Non DPAP/ DDP Block<br />

vii Area under rain-fed<br />

agriculture<br />

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70<br />

%<br />

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village<br />

(7.5)<br />

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %<br />

(10)<br />

x Productivity potential <strong>of</strong><br />

the land<br />

xi<br />

Contiguity to another<br />

watershed that has already<br />

15 Lands with low production<br />

& where productivity can be<br />

significantly enhanced with<br />

reasonable efforts (15)<br />

10 Contiguous to previously<br />

treated watershed &<br />

Lands with moderate<br />

production & where<br />

productivity can be<br />

enhanced with<br />

reasonable efforts (10)<br />

Contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

Partially covered (5)<br />

Low- less than 10 % <strong>of</strong><br />

TGA (5)<br />

Lands with high<br />

production & where<br />

productivity can be<br />

marginally enhanced<br />

with reasonable efforts<br />

(5)<br />

Neither contiguous to<br />

previously treated<br />

(Reject)<br />

Fully<br />

covered<br />

(0)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 14


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

been developed/ treated<br />

xii Cluster approach in the<br />

plains (more than one<br />

contiguous microwatersheds<br />

in the project)<br />

xiii Cluster approach in the<br />

hills (more than one<br />

contiguous microwatersheds<br />

in the project)<br />

contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in the<br />

project (10)<br />

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds<br />

in cluster (15)<br />

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds<br />

in cluster (15)<br />

the project but non<br />

contiguous to<br />

previously treated<br />

watershed (5)<br />

4 to 6<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

cluster (10)<br />

3 to 5<br />

microwatersheds in<br />

cluster (10)<br />

watershed nor<br />

contiguity within the<br />

microwatersheds in the<br />

project (0)<br />

2 to 4 microwatersheds<br />

in cluster (5)<br />

2 to 3 microwatersheds<br />

in cluster (5)<br />

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5<br />

Table no. 3: Watershed information<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the project No. <strong>of</strong> watersheds<br />

Watershed code<br />

Watershed regime/type/order<br />

to be treated<br />

Kharachiya(Jam) 4 5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a Milli watershed<br />

Panchavda 5 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9c1e,<br />

Milli watershed<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

Jangavad 4 5G1B9d3b, 5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9d3c Milli watershed<br />

Jasapar 6 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c, 5G1B9c1d,<br />

5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b<br />

Milli watershed<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 15


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages<br />

(1) MGNREGS: Pond deepening and widening <strong>of</strong> road works completed in Kharachiya Jam, desilting <strong>of</strong> percolation tank in<br />

Panchavda, construction <strong>of</strong> road and desilting <strong>of</strong> thee check dams with a cost <strong>of</strong> 7.6 lakh and in Jasapar desilting <strong>of</strong> percolation tank<br />

with cost <strong>of</strong> 2.10 lakha has been completed till date.<br />

(2) Prehariyali/ Hariyali watershed programme: Under the EAS and DDP project, total area <strong>of</strong> 2500 ha in total project area have<br />

been treated where all activities related to soil and water conservation measures have been taken care. Two solar street-lamps<br />

installed so far under DDP to promote non conventional source <strong>of</strong> energy in each village.<br />

(3) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 360 individual toilets in the project villages and two public toilets in Kharachiya and Jangvad<br />

,has been constructed under TSC programme in the project area. All the remaining house hold will be covered under this scheme.<br />

(4) Indira Awas Yojana: Total 113 house has been constructed in the four villages (13 in Kharachiya Jam, 23 in Pachavda, 31 in<br />

Jangvad and 46 in Jasapar ) under IAY.<br />

(5) SAY: 6 nos <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries have been benefitted with a house under Sardar Awas yojana.<br />

(6) WASMO/Sector reform: In the project villages 75 % <strong>of</strong> the houses get water by tap connection under WASMO programme.<br />

(7) GGY: All the villagers have been benefitted under this programme where new rooms in school, cement concrete road in market,<br />

community hall and renovation <strong>of</strong> bus stop work has been taken.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 16


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.4: <strong>Development</strong>al programmes running in the project area:<br />

Kharachiya Jam<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 Sector reform/WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank, Havada Bore Well<br />

2001-02 1 238<br />

- Pipe-line<br />

2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 650<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2003-04 1 13<br />

4 EAS Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1995-96 1 322<br />

5 GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />

Primary School Room Model -<br />

Sanitation<br />

2001-10 1<br />

6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 99<br />

All the<br />

villagers<br />

Panchvada<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank-2, Pipe-line, Sump 2004-05 1 422<br />

2 MNNREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 360<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2004-05 1 23<br />

4 SAY Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Housing 2006-07 1 1<br />

6 DDP-4,11 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1999-2004 2 614<br />

7 GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong> School - Room 2003-04 1<br />

All the<br />

villagers<br />

8 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2004-05 1 119<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 17


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Jangvad<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

1 WASMO Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Water tank-2, Pipe-line, Sump 2004-05 1 568<br />

2 MGNREGS CRD Employment 2009/10 1 1289<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2004-05 1 31<br />

4 SAY Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> Housing 2009-10 1 4<br />

5 DDP-10 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 2004-2005 1 365<br />

6<br />

GGY Govt. Of <strong>Gujarat</strong> C.C. Road, Community Hall 2004-05 1 All villagers<br />

7 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2005-06 1 61<br />

Jasapar<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

1<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

WASMO<br />

Sponsoring<br />

agency<br />

Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong><br />

Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme/scheme<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

commencement<br />

Villages<br />

covered<br />

Estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

Pipe-line, Sump 2009-10 1 319<br />

2 NREGS CRD Employment 2009-10 1 470<br />

3 IAY CRD Housing 2009-2010 1 46<br />

4 DDP-5 Central Govt. Desert Area <strong>Development</strong> 1999-2006 1 297<br />

Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> School-Room, CC Road,<br />

All the<br />

5 GGY<br />

2004-05 2<br />

Community Hall, Bus Stand<br />

villagers<br />

6 TSC Govt <strong>of</strong> India Sanitation 2005-06 1 79<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 18


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programme in the project area:<br />

SI<br />

n o<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

1 Pre-<br />

Haryal<br />

il<br />

(EAS)<br />

2 DDP-<br />

IV<br />

5 Pre-<br />

Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

V)<br />

Year<br />

started<br />

1995-<br />

1996<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Kharachi<br />

ya (Jam)<br />

1995-96 Panchavd<br />

a<br />

3 Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

XI)<br />

4 Hariyal<br />

i(DDP-<br />

X)<br />

2005-<br />

2006<br />

2004-<br />

2005<br />

1999-<br />

2000<br />

Panchavd<br />

a<br />

No. Of Watershed<br />

micro codes<br />

watersh<br />

ed<br />

4 5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9c1f(4)<br />

5G1B9c2a<br />

5 5G1B9d3a<br />

5G!B9d2d<br />

5G!B9c1d<br />

5G!B9c1e<br />

5G!B9d3c<br />

Area<br />

under<br />

treatm<br />

ent<br />

(ha)<br />

Funding<br />

source<br />

Nodal<br />

agency<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

1 5G1B9c1c 500 Govt. DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

Jangavad 4 5G1B9d3b<br />

5G1B9d3c<br />

5G1B9d3d<br />

5G1B9d3e<br />

Jasapar 6 5G1B9c1g<br />

5G1B9c1b<br />

5G1B9c1c<br />

5G1B9c1d<br />

5G1B9d3a<br />

5G1B9d2b<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

500 GOI DWD U<br />

Rajkot<br />

PIA<br />

Total<br />

cost<br />

Expenditure<br />

incurred up<br />

to start <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IWMP</strong><br />

% financial<br />

completion % physical<br />

completion<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Taluka<br />

panch.<br />

Taluka<br />

panch.<br />

30.00 30.00 100 100<br />

30.00 30.00 100 100<br />

Grisave 22.50 22.50 100 100<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 19


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 2<br />

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 20


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.1 Project Implementing Agency<br />

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs<br />

would be responsible for implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous<br />

organizations under <strong>State</strong>/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary<br />

Organizations (VOs).The PIA <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong>-III watershed Project is District watershed development Unit, Rajkot.<br />

2.2 About District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit, Rajkot.<br />

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:<br />

The District Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Unit (DWDU), Rajkot is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12th June 2008 under<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> Para 30 <strong>of</strong> new guideline, to oversee for the smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed projects in the district. The District<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Officer (DDO) is the chairman <strong>of</strong> the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project<br />

Manager (deputation from <strong>Gujarat</strong> Forest Department), a technical expert (on contract basis) and multidisciplinary team <strong>of</strong> civil engineer,<br />

agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and computer operator. The remaining staff i.e. MIS coordinator, system analyst,<br />

Livestock specialist will be recruited very soon. The DWDU Rajkot has its own rented <strong>of</strong>fice near Junction plot 5, Prakash Niketan.<br />

The functions <strong>of</strong> DWDU:<br />

a) Take up the over all responsibility <strong>of</strong> facilitating preparation <strong>of</strong> strategic and annual action plans for watershed development projects in<br />

the district.<br />

b) Providing pr<strong>of</strong>essional and technical support to Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) in planning and execution <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />

development projects.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 21


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

c) Develop action plans for capacity building with close involvement <strong>of</strong> resource organizations to execute the capacity building action<br />

plans.<br />

d) Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.<br />

e) Ensure smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds to watershed development projects.<br />

f) Ensure timely submission <strong>of</strong> required documents to SLNA/Nodel Agency <strong>of</strong> the Department at central level.<br />

g) Facilitate and co-ordination with relevant programmes <strong>of</strong> agriculture, horticulture, rural development, animal husbandry, etc with<br />

watershed development and convergence plans for enhancement <strong>of</strong> productivity and livelihoods interventions for asset less persons.<br />

h) Integrate and co-ordinate watershed development projects/plans into district plans <strong>of</strong> the district planning committees.<br />

i) Establish and maintain the District Level Date Cell and link it to the <strong>State</strong> Level and National Level Data Centre.<br />

Moreover, the DWDU, Rajkot is working as a PIA for three <strong>IWMP</strong> projects.<br />

2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district<br />

At present nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have been sanctioned by Government <strong>of</strong> India for the Rajkot district. The entry point activities <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects have identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Rajkot Normal Forest Division as PIA for the four projects<br />

(<strong>IWMP</strong>-IV, V, VII & VIII), Rajkot Social Forest division as PIA for two (<strong>IWMP</strong>-I & VI) projects and DWDU-self is as PIA for the three<br />

projects (<strong>IWMP</strong>-II, III & IX).<br />

Apart from running nine <strong>IWMP</strong> projects, total 748 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and out <strong>of</strong> that<br />

348 projects are completed and 400 projects are still running in the district. DWDU Rajkot is also monitoring a central government<br />

sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge <strong>of</strong> Groundwater through Dug wells" in the district which is spread over nine talukas.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 22


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.3 SWOT Analysis <strong>of</strong> the DWDU<br />

Strength:<br />

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team<br />

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.<br />

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Sourastra University, KVK and NGOs for capacity<br />

building and technical guidance<br />

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help <strong>of</strong> BISAG, Gandhinagar<br />

(5) District level monitoring, coordination Committee<br />

(6) Well establishment <strong>of</strong> PRIs for social audits for transparency and accountability.<br />

Weakness:<br />

(1) Insufficient funds to complete watershed projects per hectare.<br />

(2) Permanent staff is less in numbers.<br />

(3) No permanent <strong>of</strong>fice building.<br />

Opportunities:<br />

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and asset less persons.<br />

(2) Improvement <strong>of</strong> socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> poor.<br />

(3) Awareness generation among the beneficiaries through information, education and communication activities.<br />

(4) Reduction in migration rate.<br />

(5) Usage <strong>of</strong> new technologies <strong>of</strong> watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring <strong>of</strong> watershed activities.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 23


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Threats:<br />

(1) Shallow soil depth that make difficult for horticultural plants in fields.<br />

(2) Lack <strong>of</strong> sustainable agricultural development package.<br />

(3) Lack <strong>of</strong> voluntary contribution and cooperation from local peoples.<br />

(4) One <strong>of</strong> the foreseen challenges was "to overcome vested interests (including party politics, village factions) at village level and to reach<br />

out to the poorest in the watersheds"<br />

Table no. 6: PIA:<br />

SI. No. Name <strong>of</strong> project Details <strong>of</strong> PIA<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> organization<br />

District Level Nodal Agency<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Organisation<br />

DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Designation and Address<br />

Project Manager.DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Telephone 0281-2454682<br />

Fax 0281-2453684<br />

E-mail<br />

rajdwdu@gmail.com<br />

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:<br />

SI Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly<br />

no<br />

remuneration<br />

1 Mr. B.M RABARI 55 M Project Manager GFS 28 Project<br />

Management<br />

50000<br />

2 Mr. S.PRDAHAN 26 M Technical expert M.Tech.(SWCE) 3 Monitoring 25000<br />

3 Mr. D.R PARMAR 34 M MDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 9 Engineering works 14000<br />

4 Mr. A.H. JOSHI 29 M MDT(Agri.) B.Tech (Ag.Engg) 4.5 Agriculture 12000<br />

5 Mrs. S.M PATEL 32 F MDT( CO) MSW 4.5 Community 12000<br />

6 Mr.V KANZARIYA 26 M MDT(Accountant) M.Com 2.5 Accounts 8000<br />

7 Mr. C.K. METALIYA 45 M WDT (Engg.) Diploma(Civil) 5 Engineering works 10000<br />

8 Mr. C.D KUKADIYA 26 M WDT (Agri.) B.R.S, B. Ed 1.5 Agriculture 8000<br />

9 Ms. RATHOD VANITA 21 F WDT (CO) B.R.S 2.2 Community 8000<br />

10 Mr A.B.KARELIYA 23 M Surveyor I.T.I (Surveyor) 2 Surveying 6000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 24


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 3<br />

Basic Information <strong>of</strong> Project Area<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 25


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology<br />

3.1.1 Land use pattern:<br />

The net geographical area <strong>of</strong> cluster watershed is about 6739.30 ha out <strong>of</strong> which 0.23% is forest area, which is about 15.90 ha. About<br />

6739.30 ha or 89 % <strong>of</strong> land is under agriculture out <strong>of</strong> which 5391.44 ha is rain fed, mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 8.74 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

land is cultivable wasteland and 1.6 percent is non cultivable wasteland. The wasteland consists <strong>of</strong> ubiquitous babul and shrubs.<br />

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:<br />

S. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Geographical<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

(ha)<br />

Forest Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Land under<br />

agricultural use<br />

Rainfed<br />

area<br />

(ha)<br />

Permanent<br />

Pastures<br />

Wasteland<br />

Cultivable Non-cultivable<br />

1 Kharachiya(Jam) 1036.40 0 869.30 829.12 21 128.30 17.80<br />

2 Panchavda 2090.10 0 1864.90 1672.08 65 90.50 69.70<br />

3 Jangavad 1988.20 0 1923.90 1590.56 27 33.90 3.40<br />

4 Jasapar 1624.60 15.90 1370.50 1299.68 46 177.40 14.80<br />

5 Total 6739.30 15.90 6028.60 5391.44 159 430.10 105.70<br />

3.1.2 Soil and topography<br />

Nearly 84 % <strong>of</strong> the geographical are is comprised <strong>of</strong> shallow to medium deep black cotton soils having depth upto 0.6-0.75 mt top soil.<br />

Rest 16 % is either sandy loam or moorum soil. The soil is slightly reddish to very brown in surface colour. By large soils are well<br />

drained with moderate water holding capacity. From sustainable development perspectives, what is alarming the steady decline in the<br />

soil quality due to sheet erosion. There has a considerable reduction in the application <strong>of</strong> farm yard manure resulting in reduced in moisture<br />

retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content too is very low. Lack <strong>of</strong> water conservation measures at<br />

the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration <strong>of</strong> environmental degradation. The increasing dependency on external input<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 26


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

has increased the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> agriculture such that even small stresses and fluctuations in the environment lead to instability and<br />

threatens farming livelihoods. The topography <strong>of</strong> the area is moderate ranging from 0-10 % slope.<br />

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography<br />

S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Agro-climatic Area in ha Name <strong>of</strong> village Major soil types Topography<br />

a)Type b] Area in ha<br />

North Saurashtra<br />

1036.40 Kharachiya (Jam) Black cotton and<br />

1<br />

red murrom<br />

2 2090.10 Panchavda Black cotton, red<br />

murrom and sandy<br />

clayloam<br />

3 1988.20 Jangavad Black cotton and<br />

red murrom,<br />

997.60 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

1929.90 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

1890 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

4<br />

1624.60 Jasapar Black cotton and<br />

sandy loam, sandy<br />

clay loam<br />

1547.90 Flat to moderate<br />

slope<br />

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition<br />

SI no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) Nil Once in 3 Years<br />

2 Panchavda Once in 2 years Once in 4 Years<br />

3 Jangavad Once in 3 years Once in 3 Years<br />

4 Jasapar Once in 1 years Once in 4 Years<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 27


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion<br />

Cause Type <strong>of</strong> erosion Area affected (ha) Run <strong>of</strong>f (mm/ year] Average soil loss (Tonnes/<br />

ha/ year)<br />

Water erosion<br />

A Sheet 3697.87 1848.94<br />

B Rill 1680.85 475 588.29<br />

C Gully 1344.68 201.70<br />

D Ravenous - -<br />

Sub-Total 6723.40 2638.94<br />

Wind erosion - -<br />

Total 13446.80 5277.87<br />

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Village Survey Number Soil pH<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Salinity<br />

(Inherent/Ingress)<br />

Kharachiya (Jam) Around 1.5 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.5 Ingress<br />

Panchavda Around 1 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.5 Ingress<br />

Jangavad Around 1 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.6 Ingress<br />

Jasapar Around 2 % <strong>of</strong> land 7.4 Ingress<br />

Table: 12. Climatic Conditions (Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature <strong>of</strong> Jasdan taluka )<br />

SI. No. Year Rainfall (in mm)<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

Max.<br />

Min.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

403<br />

624<br />

44.<br />

43<br />

8<br />

7<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

896<br />

900<br />

45<br />

44<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

5 2008 698 43 7.5<br />

6 2009 354 46 6<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 28


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The project area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon <strong>of</strong> drought two to<br />

three years. The average rainfall <strong>of</strong> this area is about 750 mm. The area faces continual crop failure that comes on whenever there is a<br />

shortfall in the total quantum <strong>of</strong> rain. However, even more serious are the gaps in rain even in years when the total rainfall is considered<br />

normal. These gaps at crucial periods in the crop growth cycle can prove fatal for the crop. However, through careful water harvesting, insitu<br />

moisture conservation and a drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ing strategy <strong>of</strong> dryland agriculture, these gaps can easily be plugged and the crops saved.<br />

3.1.3 Slope<br />

The slope <strong>of</strong> the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height) from satellite maps and provided by<br />

BISAG, Gandhinagar. These maps will help in recommendation/implementation <strong>of</strong> suitable land management practices in association <strong>of</strong><br />

other thematic information.<br />

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief<br />

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams<br />

Kharachiya (Jam) 0-15 meters 0-10% Dudhalo,Baval wali, Baldoki wokla,<br />

Padardi,Khari and Dadwa wali,Virnagari<br />

Panchavda 0-10 meters 0-12% Bhadar, Geldi, Hadio, Budhan pari,<br />

Dudhalo, Kharachiya wokla,Bhad<br />

Jangavad 0-12 meters 0-15% Wanki wokli, Sidhpari, Bhadar, Kanpari<br />

Melan, Dhar wali, Bhad<br />

Jasapar 0-10 meters 0-10% Dudalo, Bhadar, Motu talab, Khari, Dhar<br />

Karanuki ,Kharo, Dadwa road, Malwa<br />

and Nihalio<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 29


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.2 Land and Agriculture<br />

The average land holding is about 6.9 ha. The total net sown area is 5224.24 ha where in more than 223.24 ha, 2 times farming is done in<br />

the watershed villages. The main crops under agriculture are cotton, groundnut, wheat, cumin, maize and fodder grass. Some <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

take up rainfed castor if the rains are good. Now a days farmers has started growing vegetables on small patches <strong>of</strong> lands in Jangvad<br />

(Rabi) season for which water is fetched either from thecheckdams..<br />

The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop <strong>of</strong> gram or cumin in<br />

the residual moisture. Since last 3-4 yrs Bt. cotton farming taking place at a higher rate.<br />

Table no. 14: Land ownership details<br />

Sl<br />

Total owned land<br />

HHs giving HHs taking<br />

Village<br />

no<br />

Gen OBC SC ST land on lease land on lease<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 290 7 3 0 0 0<br />

2 Panchavda 288 20 10 0 0 0<br />

3 Jangavad 314 52 2 0 0 0<br />

4 Jasapar 270 26 6 0 0 0<br />

Total 1162 105 21 0 0 0<br />

Table no. 15: Agriculture<br />

Sl no Village Net sown area (ha)<br />

One time Two times Three times<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 829.08 36.04 7.84<br />

2 Panchavda 1603.34 69.96 19.60<br />

3 Jangavad 1516.36 74.20 15.35<br />

4 Jasapar 1275.76 43.04 13.80<br />

Total 5224.54 223.24 56.59<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 30


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3.2.1 Irrigation<br />

The irrigated area is 538 ha, which is 17 % <strong>of</strong> the total agricultural area <strong>of</strong> the village. Main source <strong>of</strong> irrigation is from previously<br />

constructed pond, check dams ponds or wells/tubes. A few farmers <strong>of</strong> Panchvada get irrigation to their field by check dams and from<br />

earthen dams which were previously constructed by different departments. Some farmers <strong>of</strong> Panchavda and Jasapar get water for irrigation<br />

from the main dugout pond cum earthen dam, which is situated on the north side <strong>of</strong> the village.<br />

Table no. 16: Irrigation<br />

SI Village<br />

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Pond/Earthen dam Source 3 : Check dam<br />

no<br />

Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area<br />

months<br />

months (Ha) (Ha) months (Ha) (Ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) - - - 5 160 185 3 84 97<br />

2 Panchavda - - - 6 168 190 4 230 250<br />

3 Jangavad - - - 5.5 75 90 3 125 140<br />

4 Jasapar - - - 6 135 150 4 120 135<br />

3 Total - - - 538 615 559 622<br />

Crop details and Productivity: The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack the skills to<br />

managing their crop but it is due lack <strong>of</strong> source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, salty water and scarcity <strong>of</strong> rain.<br />

The cluster villages come under draught prone zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they<br />

generally grow high value crops as discussed above. In case <strong>of</strong> low rainfall they go for cotton, castor, pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon<br />

decides cropping patterns <strong>of</strong> the project villages.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 31


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 17: Crop details<br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

Kharif (Monsoon)<br />

Crop 1 Cotton Kg/Ha Crop 2 Groundnut Crop 3 Fodder Kg/Ha<br />

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

521.08 776335 1489.91 288 323536 1123.39 20 18580 929.01<br />

2 Panchavda 892.32 1274130 1427.88 668.30 738965 1105.73 42.72 39750 930.47<br />

3 Jangavad 902.68 1264675 1401.02 599.84 766970 1278.62 13.84 12880 930.63<br />

4 Jasapar 748.32 1008430 1347.59 496.80 621100 1250.20 30.64 28500 930.15<br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

Rabi (Winter)<br />

Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Jiru Q/Ha Crop 3 Chana<br />

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

18.99 41880 2205.37 7.85 7850 1000 9.20 11310 1229.34<br />

2 Panchavda 47.20 104310 2209.95 22.06 22355 982.20 0.70 860 1228.57<br />

3 Jangavad 44.30 97550 2202.03 28.30 27735 980.03 1.60 2500 1562.50<br />

4 Jasapar 34.06 60465 1775.24 7.68 14510 1889.32 1.30 1850 1423.07<br />

Reasons <strong>of</strong> Low productivity <strong>of</strong> various crops<br />

Over a period <strong>of</strong> time by continuous usage <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides, there is deterioration in the quality <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

particularly reduction <strong>of</strong> carbon content and increase <strong>of</strong> salinity. One <strong>of</strong> the reasons ascribed to low response <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers in dry<br />

lands is their low status <strong>of</strong> soil organic matter. Rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> soil characteristics is an important area to tackle, with specific emphasis<br />

on recovery <strong>of</strong> its nutritional value. More thrust need to be given on adopting methods such as multi-cropping, rotation <strong>of</strong> crops and<br />

organic farming. Organic farming, nutrient management continues to be a focal issue in dry lands as the fertilizer use is not likely to<br />

pick up significantly unless water supply is assured. Soil fertility in dry lands can be sustained only through maintenance <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

matter and achieving better fertilizer-use efficiency through integration <strong>of</strong> moisture-conservation practices along with soil-fertility<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 32


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

management.<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> Seeds: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use <strong>of</strong> good quality leads to<br />

higher land productivity. In project villages, however, there are two limitations in the use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most<br />

useful in irrigated condition. The agricultural land <strong>of</strong> the cluster villages however totally depend on rainfall. In villages mostly farmers<br />

use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer depleting the quality <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

Traditional farming methods: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot <strong>of</strong> ignorance about the use <strong>of</strong> new farming<br />

methods and technologies such as multiple cropping.<br />

Erratic/Low rainfall: The Villagers mainly depend on monsoon. Without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is salty<br />

<br />

.Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence <strong>of</strong> proper irrigation facility, 100% <strong>of</strong> the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain<br />

monsoon. Therefore the success or failure <strong>of</strong> the monsoon determines the success or failure <strong>of</strong> agriculture production. The rains, as a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> irrigation, are unreliable due to two factors;<br />

Untimely Rainfall: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due to<br />

untimely rain.<br />

Inadequate Rainfall: The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that contributes to low productivity <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Credit: Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit<br />

mainly for the purchase <strong>of</strong> various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair <strong>of</strong> implements. They use long term<br />

credit for buying land, and for investment to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.<br />

3.3 Livestock<br />

The cluster villages have total <strong>of</strong> 1162 cows and 1372 number <strong>of</strong> buffaloes out <strong>of</strong> which majority are <strong>of</strong> local breed, there are 1645<br />

bullock, 375 goats 459 sheep and 1160 animals in others category. Due saline water at a shallow depth and surface water has reduced<br />

the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state with their herds <strong>of</strong> goats and sheep.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 33


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 18: Livestock<br />

SI Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk Goat<br />

no<br />

(Buffalo+Cow<br />

Sheep Bullock Hen Others<br />

No Milk No Milk No Milk<br />

1 Kharachiya 276 12705 267 10395 23100 82 40 65 328 - 281<br />

2 Panchavda 411 25863 267 10745 36608 96 45 81 503 12 260<br />

3 Jangavad 355 23536 241 9650 33186 93 43 174 410 8 262<br />

4 Jasapar 330 24789 407 13402 38191 104 49 139 404 5 357<br />

Total 1372 86963 1162 44192 131085 375 177 459 1645 25 1160<br />

Table no. 19: Drinking water<br />

SI no Village Ground water table (mt) Source <strong>of</strong> drinking water Availability in months Quality<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 13.00mt. SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

2 Panchavda 12.50 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

3 Jangavad 13.50 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

4 Jasapar 12.00 mt SSNL Pipe connection 12 (once in 3 Days) Good<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 34


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 20: Details <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />

Total Area (ha)<br />

Names<br />

Area owned/ In possession <strong>of</strong><br />

S.<br />

CPR<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Govt.<br />

Any other<br />

No.<br />

Particulars<br />

project<br />

Pvt. persons (specify PRI (Pl.<br />

1<br />

<strong>IWMP</strong>-<br />

III<br />

Pvt.<br />

persons<br />

Area available for treatment (ha)<br />

Govt.<br />

(specify<br />

deptt.)<br />

deptt.)<br />

Specify)<br />

Wasteland/ degraded land 430.1 105.7 125 30<br />

Pastures 159 19<br />

Orchards 4 45 1 5<br />

Forest 15.90 4.5<br />

Village Ponds 2 19<br />

Check dams 95<br />

Canal -<br />

Community Buildings 6 4<br />

Weekly Markets<br />

Permanent markets -<br />

Temples/ Places <strong>of</strong><br />

worship<br />

3.5 Socio-Economic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

22<br />

PRI<br />

Any other<br />

(Pl.<br />

Specify)<br />

3.5.1 Demographic Status: Cluster villages have total family <strong>of</strong> 1967 numbers. There are 10885 persons in the project villages (From the<br />

door to door survey report), out <strong>of</strong> which 5594 male and 5271 female members. The sex ratio is 942 females to 1000 males. The average<br />

family size is 5.6 percent. Four major caste systems prevail in the village namely: Patel, Darbar, Rabari and Harijans. Around 9.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the cluster villges belong to SC families. Majority <strong>of</strong> population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 35


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 21: Demographic information<br />

SI no Village Population SC ST<br />

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %<br />

1 Kharachiya 2199 1146 1053 134 69 65 6 0 - - -<br />

2 Panchavda 2689 1361 1328 303 157 146 11 0 - - -<br />

3 Jangavad 3378 1752 1626 174 89 85 5 0<br />

4 Jasapar 2619 1335 1264 426 224 202 8 0 - - -<br />

5 Total 10885 5594 5271 1037 539 498 7 0 - - -<br />

Table no. 22: Literacy rate<br />

SI no Village<br />

Literacy<br />

Literacy % above Literacy %<br />

Total % Male % Female % age 14<br />

below age 14<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 1568 71.31 871 39 697 31 55 16<br />

2 Panchavda 1932 71 1076 40 856 32 54.48 17.37<br />

3 Jangavad 2340 69.27 1316 38 1024 30 53.08 16.19<br />

4 Jasapar 1898 72.47 1044 39 854 33 53.07 19.40<br />

5 Total 7738 71 4307 39 3431 31.5 54 17<br />

3.5.2 Migration Pattern: The declining yield and product, steady erosion <strong>of</strong> soil fertility and diminishing returns to the farmers and<br />

almost zero investment on land development has set in motion a dynamic problem <strong>of</strong> degradation. Many small and marginal seek<br />

alternate livelihood means and work as wage labour in nearby areas. Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality.<br />

On account <strong>of</strong> agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part <strong>of</strong> the year, the people migrate for<br />

a better half <strong>of</strong> the year for wage labour. Migrate to nearby cities like Morbi, Maliya miyana and parts <strong>of</strong> Suarashtra as daily wages<br />

agricultural labours and factory workers. Lack <strong>of</strong> fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers to<br />

migrate to other places.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 36


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 23: Migration details<br />

SI no Village Total Migration<br />

Migration by months<br />

population Total Male Female Up to 3 3-6 months More than 6<br />

months<br />

months<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 2199 128 94 34 - 128 -<br />

2 Panchavda 2689 162 112 50 - 162 -<br />

3 Jangavad 3378 214 154 60 - 214 -<br />

4 Jasapar 2619 156 98 58 - 156 -<br />

Total 10885 660 458 202 - 660 -<br />

Main reason<br />

for migration<br />

Discussed<br />

above<br />

Income during<br />

migration /<br />

month<br />

Rs 4500 /month<br />

Table no. 24: Poverty<br />

SI no Village Total Household<br />

BPL<br />

%<strong>of</strong> BPLHH Total Land less HH % <strong>of</strong> land less HH<br />

0-16 16-20 Total<br />

1 Kharachiya 404 14 107 121 29 104 25<br />

2 Panchavda 472 43 68 111 23 154 32<br />

3 Jangavad 599 11 92 103 17 231 38<br />

4 Jasapar 492 21 123 144 29 190 38<br />

Total 1967 89 390 479 24 679 33<br />

3.5.3 Infrastructure facilities<br />

All watershed villages are well connected with Jasdan taluka with pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram<br />

Yojana <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Government. Nearly 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> households in the villages have their personal electric meters. The villages have<br />

primary school with all facilities like two personal computers. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to<br />

Jasapar and Atkot village which is about 5 kilometres away from Kharachiya, Jangvad and Panchavda. The villagers depend upon Atkot<br />

primary health centre for health problems. Each village comes under their individual Gram Panchayat with Panchayat <strong>of</strong>fice at their own<br />

village.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 37


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure<br />

SI Village Pucca Schools<br />

Colleges Post Office Banks<br />

no<br />

road to LP UP HS (Number) (Distance) (Number) Distance Milk Milk Other Any other<br />

from collection cooperative cooperatives institution<br />

the<br />

nearest centre (Number) /CBIs<br />

village<br />

(Y/N)<br />

market<br />

yard<br />

(Number)<br />

(Number)<br />

1 Kharachiya Y Y N N N 0.5KM 5 KM 13 km 1 1 0 N<br />

2 Panchavda Y Y Y N N 0.25 KM 5 KM 13 km 2 2 1 N<br />

3 Jangavad Y Y Y N N 0.25 KM 4 KM 12 km 3 1 1 N<br />

4 Jasapar Y Y Y Y N 0.25 KM 4 KM 18 km 2 1 1 Y<br />

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets<br />

SI<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

HHs with<br />

electricity<br />

HHs with<br />

safety<br />

latrines<br />

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle<br />

Landline Mobile 2 -wheeler 4- wheeler<br />

HHs with<br />

TV set<br />

HHs with HHs with<br />

cooking gas Drinking<br />

water<br />

1 Kharachiya 394 67 18 494 274 9 259 76 375 180<br />

2 Panchavda 472 53 32 442 259 17 260 98 469 170<br />

3 Jangavad 564 136 51 701 368 17 351 86 438 242<br />

4 Jasapar 473 152 32 499 274 9 259 67 319 198<br />

Total 1903 408 133 2136 1175 43 1129 327 1601 790<br />

HHs with<br />

freedge<br />

3.5.4 Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture, and during lean seasons they go as<br />

daily wage labourers in thresher industries, diamond polishing and in handicraft unit at Jasdan taluka. Another major occupation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people is business and service and working in ginning & oil mills and diamond polishing industries.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 38


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 27: Per capita Income<br />

SI no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others(Services Total<br />

& Business)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 39703161 463800 2150000 3285450 45602411<br />

2 Panchavda 55713917 1411180 2814500 3109500 63049097<br />

3 Jangavad 53849232 676230 5150200 2053800 61729462<br />

4 Jasapar 16507103 2112000 2713000 2273000 23605103<br />

Total 165773413 4663210 12827700 10721750 193986073<br />

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR<br />

Benefit type<br />

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2<br />

Sl no Village<br />

2<br />

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) NA<br />

2 Panchavda NA<br />

3 Jangavad NA<br />

4 Jasapar NA<br />

Total<br />

income<br />

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)<br />

Animal<br />

Sl<br />

Total<br />

Village<br />

Agriculture husbandry<br />

no<br />

workforce<br />

(AH)<br />

Kharachiya<br />

1<br />

(Jam)<br />

Agriculture<br />

+ AH<br />

Agriculture/<br />

Casual<br />

labour<br />

Services<br />

Handicraft/<br />

Business<br />

404 267 10 34 28 4 28 33<br />

2 Panchavda 472 280 13 38 5 7 40 89<br />

3 Jangavad 599 337 3 33 21 11 91 103<br />

4 Jasapar 492 271 12 31 31 5 48 94<br />

Total 1967 1155 38 136 85 27 207 319<br />

Others<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 39


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 4<br />

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 40


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Watershed Activities<br />

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government <strong>of</strong> India especially in the rainfed regions <strong>of</strong> semi-arid<br />

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undepependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, comparatively<br />

low literacy and medium incidence <strong>of</strong> migration. The inheritant low fertility <strong>of</strong> crops results in lower productivity <strong>of</strong> crops which have a very<br />

low biological efficiency.<br />

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need <strong>of</strong> a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The<br />

common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.<br />

4.1. Scientific Planning:<br />

i) Cluster Approach<br />

This envisages a broader vision <strong>of</strong> Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster <strong>of</strong> micro-watershed. The project consists <strong>of</strong><br />

thirteen micro-watersheds namely 5G1B9c1e, 5G1B9c1d, 5G1B9c1f, 5G1B9c2a, 5G1B9d3a, 5G1B9d2b, 5G1B9d3c, 5G1B9d3b,<br />

5G1B9d3d, 5G1B9d3e, 5G1B9c1g, 5G1B9c1b, 5G1B9c1c as their respective codes.<br />

ii) Base line Survey<br />

a) Door to Door Survey<br />

The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the<br />

information related to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to<br />

• Head <strong>of</strong> the families<br />

• Mostly females (between 65% and 70%)<br />

• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 41


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• High School education<br />

• Sarpanch and Talati <strong>of</strong> respective Gram Panchayats.<br />

• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, handicraft unit workers,electric drum making units and workers <strong>of</strong><br />

thresher units.<br />

• Cattle Breeders<br />

• Landless labour<br />

The questionnaire was divided into nine modules through which information is extracted pertaining to<br />

1. Village details<br />

2. Population details<br />

3. Water supply details<br />

4. Water source details<br />

5. Questions about community engagement<br />

6. Questions about Livelihood<br />

7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed<br />

8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation<br />

9. Productivity <strong>of</strong> farms<br />

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social pr<strong>of</strong>ile is also collected through Census reports.<br />

Secondary data related to different kinds <strong>of</strong> capital assets were collected from different departments <strong>of</strong> Government agencies such as<br />

Revenue Office, Primary Health Center, District <strong>Rural</strong> development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme <strong>of</strong>fice, working on poverty<br />

alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 42


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

b) Field to field Survey: Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram<br />

Panchayat. It also includes the soil pr<strong>of</strong>iles, no <strong>of</strong> wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> irrigation in the field. The details <strong>of</strong> agriculture as well as pasture lands <strong>of</strong> the village where the existing condition and structures<br />

to be proposed, were written down. Almost all the farmers <strong>of</strong> the village were there to support the survey team. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the survey<br />

was also to understand water availability, patterns <strong>of</strong> water use and peoples’ understanding & perceptions about both surface and<br />

groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis <strong>of</strong> such detailed work. This also survey looked at the<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding <strong>of</strong> farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This<br />

understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term protocols <strong>of</strong><br />

groundwater management in respective areas.<br />

c) Demand survey: To know about the livelihood pattern <strong>of</strong> the village and the present status and practice capacities required are<br />

discussed. Quantitative involved also on possible micro enterprise development for sustainable development <strong>of</strong> village extensively for<br />

SC/ST and landless/migrated poor people.<br />

iii) Participatory <strong>Rural</strong> Appraisal (PRA)<br />

In order to understand the social, economic and political aspect <strong>of</strong> all the villages <strong>of</strong> the cluster, we conducted Participatory <strong>Rural</strong><br />

Appraisal (PRA) exercise with the help <strong>of</strong> the villagers on 11 th February 2010 in Panchavda, 18 th August in Kharachiya, 23 rd in both<br />

Jasapar and Jangvad . It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality. We had the opportunity to interact with more than<br />

600 numbers <strong>of</strong> people in Panchavda village. To reach a concrete conclusion we requested a few villagers for focussed discussion and it<br />

was entertained. As per their convenience we conducted focussed group discussion at the Community hall and Panchayat Bhavan ground.<br />

In majority <strong>of</strong> the discussion, we listened to them carefully and tried to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise<br />

is placed below.<br />

(i) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern <strong>of</strong> village, community pasture land, farm<br />

areas, about the river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 43


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

(ii) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location <strong>of</strong> different institution <strong>of</strong> the village. During this<br />

exercise we also had informal discussions with the participants about the importance <strong>of</strong> these institutions. Important location pointed out<br />

during this exercise was Community Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location.<br />

(iii) Seasonal Diagram:- With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements <strong>of</strong> villagers across the twelve months <strong>of</strong><br />

the year. We found that rainfed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months <strong>of</strong> the year. About<br />

drinking water they informed that, situation in the month <strong>of</strong> March to June is really difficult as they get water once in three days.<br />

(iv) Tree matrix:- We came to know about different trees <strong>of</strong> the villages and their respective utilities as fruit, fuel, fodder, medicine ,<br />

timber etc. Major trees pointed out by villagers under this exercise were Pipal, Neem, Bor, Lemon, Banyan and Pipara etc. Taking into<br />

consideration all the utilities it was found that the tree having maximum utility is Chiku and lemon.<br />

(v) Crop Pattern:- Agriculture is the primary source <strong>of</strong> liveihood for more than 70% household . After this exercise we came to know<br />

that there are two major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabbi. Under Kharif cotton,ground nut and fodder crops and in rabi, major<br />

crops grown are wheat, cumin, gram and vegetables.<br />

(vi) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong> villagers and how the<br />

money earned by the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source <strong>of</strong> earning among villagers are farming,<br />

dairy, service etc. Major expenditure component were food, fuel, fodder, schooling <strong>of</strong> children, medicines, festivals, relatives, and paan etc.<br />

One focussed group discussion was organised to understand the status <strong>of</strong> different Self help Group operating in the village. This<br />

discussion concentrated around the activities <strong>of</strong> SHG, terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> membership, working pattern <strong>of</strong> different SHG and their role<br />

in the development <strong>of</strong> society etc<br />

Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution <strong>of</strong> the village. Apart from different institution discussion was<br />

concentrated about gram panchayat issue. Here the major discussion point was participation <strong>of</strong> women and deprived section <strong>of</strong> the society<br />

in the decision making process, their representation in the panchayat. How the panchayat facilitates the process <strong>of</strong> development and<br />

poverty alleviation. In this process its relation with different institution <strong>of</strong> village like dispensary, Aanganwari Kendra, Primary School and<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 44


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

High school was also discussed.<br />

The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income, expenditure,<br />

crisis management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time <strong>of</strong> men and women, and market network for<br />

agricultural produce etc. In the gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division <strong>of</strong> labour, the status <strong>of</strong> women in<br />

relation to the right to use, to own and sell different household properties, the means <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the household, and the role and<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> women in decision-making at intra household and community levels.<br />

To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focussed discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different<br />

types as shown below to know all the details <strong>of</strong> the village in a stipulated time.<br />

• Small and marginal farmers<br />

• Large farmers<br />

• Landless farmers<br />

• Women<br />

• Gram Panchayat members<br />

• Cattle grazing population<br />

• Business man and women<br />

Problems Identification<br />

After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified as<br />

• Poor fertility <strong>of</strong> soil and low agricultural productivity<br />

• Soil Erosion from farm land<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 45


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Improper Crop Rotation<br />

• Less use <strong>of</strong> bio-fertilizers<br />

• Almost negligible cultivation <strong>of</strong> arid fruits<br />

• Less cultivation <strong>of</strong> vegetables<br />

• Low milk production and rearing <strong>of</strong> non descript breeds<br />

• No use <strong>of</strong> vermi compost<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> value addition practices<br />

• Drinking Water<br />

• Less availability <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

• Market (No nearby)<br />

• Migration<br />

• Sanitation Problems<br />

• Less Nutritional Level<br />

• Malnutrition in few farm families<br />

iv) Use <strong>of</strong> GIS and Remote sensing for planning<br />

Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study <strong>of</strong> natural resources and helps in planning water resources development. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> the greatest advantages <strong>of</strong> using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information<br />

in spatial and temporal domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation Use <strong>of</strong> various high science tools has<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 46


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

been promoted at various stages <strong>of</strong> watershed development.<br />

a) Prioritization<br />

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological,<br />

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation and slope percent. These were all<br />

given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization <strong>of</strong> various watershed areas.<br />

b) Planning<br />

A action plan matrix has been formulated by <strong>State</strong> Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent,<br />

soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.<br />

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will<br />

be used to create a map. Contour Map <strong>of</strong> vertical interval <strong>of</strong> 1 meter at a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for<br />

soil and water conservation structures.<br />

c) Hydrological modelling<br />

Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This<br />

model overlaid over cadastral map hel to calculate the catchment area <strong>of</strong> each structures like the check dam with the help <strong>of</strong> contour map<br />

provided by BISAG and physical survey on site. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurring while calculating the<br />

catchment area <strong>of</strong> a check dam.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 47


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 30: Details <strong>of</strong> Scientific Planning and Inputs in <strong>IWMP</strong> projects<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Scientific criteria/ inputs used<br />

Whether scientific criteria was<br />

used<br />

(A) Planning<br />

Cluster approach<br />

Yes<br />

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the Institute<br />

Yes<br />

Baseline survey<br />

Yes<br />

Hydro-geological survey<br />

Yes<br />

Contour mapping<br />

Yes<br />

Participatory Net Planning (PNP)<br />

Yes<br />

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-<strong>of</strong>f cover<br />

Yes<br />

Ridge to Valley treatment<br />

Yes<br />

Online IT connectivity between<br />

Yes<br />

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes<br />

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes<br />

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> GIS layers<br />

Yes<br />

1. Cadastral map Yes<br />

2. Village boundaries Yes<br />

3. Drainage Yes<br />

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes<br />

5. Land use Yes<br />

6. Ground water status Yes<br />

7. Watershed boundaries Yes<br />

8. Activity Yes<br />

Crop simulation models #<br />

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high<br />

speed soil nutrient analysis<br />

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#<br />

Weather Station<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 48


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Yes<br />

(B) Inputs<br />

Yes<br />

1. Bio-pesticides Yes<br />

2. Organic manures Yes<br />

3. Vermicompost Yes<br />

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes<br />

5. Water saving devices Yes<br />

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes<br />

7. Bio-fencing Yes<br />

8. Nutrient budgeting<br />

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers<br />

4.2. Institution Building<br />

i)Watershed Committee (WC)<br />

This is the general body <strong>of</strong> the residents constituted by Gram sabha <strong>of</strong> the watershed as well as farmers who own land within the watershed<br />

area registered under society Registration Act 1860. The first gram sabha meeting was held on 4 th February 2010 in Kharachiya Jam, 11 th<br />

Jan in Panchvda, 15 th February in Jangvad and 14 th April 2010 in Jasapar, where the watershed committee was formed taking in to account<br />

all caste, women representation and Gram panchayat members .Both President and Secretary <strong>of</strong> WC were selected after the first Watershed<br />

Committee meeting was held. The secretary will be a paid functionary <strong>of</strong> the watershed committee.The Watershed Committee with the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT) shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the user groups based on the principle <strong>of</strong><br />

equity and sustainability. Capacity building training to the watershed committee will be provided by WDT member. The watershed committee<br />

has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and overall planning <strong>of</strong> various points.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 49


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.1: Watershed Committee details (Kharachiya Jam )<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Devshibhai G.Chovatiya President M Y Y 7 D<br />

Rajeshbhai M.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Secretary M Y Y 12 C<br />

Paremjibhai Mavajibhai<br />

Dhameliya<br />

Member M Y Y 11 A<br />

Jaysukha A.Chovatiya Member M Y Y 7 B<br />

Nirmalaben G. Rrivedi Member F Y Y 11 I<br />

Bhavanaben K.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Member F Y Y 5 I-G<br />

Manjulaben B.Jadav Member F Y Y Y 0 I<br />

Parmaben B. Ratdiya Member F Y Y 1 F-B-E<br />

Bachubahi G. Chovatiya Member M Y Y 7 B-H<br />

Vallbhbhai L.<br />

Chovatiya<br />

Member M Y Y 5 E-G<br />

Sureshbhai A. Karpada Member M Y Y B.com B<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 50


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Panchvada)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Panchvada<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Niranjan N. Viyas President M Y Y BA D<br />

Ashok L. Tadhani Secretary M Y BA C<br />

Lilaben S. Mesuriya Member F Y Y 0 A<br />

Parshotam B. Tadhani Member M Y 7 B<br />

Haribhai D.Makvana Member M Y Y Y Y 5 I<br />

Jayaben H. Tadhani Member F Y Y 8 I-G<br />

Gelaben U. Labariya Member F Y Y 1 I<br />

Jayaben M. Tadhani Member F Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Jeshigbhai M. Dav Member M Y Y 7 B-H<br />

Kantaben R.Jalu Member F Y Y 0 E-G<br />

Gopalbhai N. Tadhani Member M Y Y 7 B<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 51


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Jangavad)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Jangvad<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registra<br />

tion as<br />

a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progress<br />

Name<br />

Designat<br />

ion<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Land<br />

-less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educational<br />

qualifi<br />

-cation<br />

Function/<br />

s<br />

assigned#<br />

Hasrajbhai J. Rangani President M Y 10 D<br />

Mukesbhai B. Khisriya Secretary M Y Y BCA C<br />

Manhardas V.<br />

Mesavaniya<br />

Member M Y Y Y 7 A<br />

Kanchanben S.<br />

Makavana<br />

Member F Y Y 2 B<br />

Raniben M. Nabhoya Member F Y 3 I<br />

Gitaben P. Shidhdhpra Member F Y 3 I-G<br />

Sonalben J. Paramar Member F Y Y 5 I<br />

Lakhamanbhai R.<br />

Kapdiya<br />

Member F Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Sardaben P. Hirpara Member F Y Y 5 B-H<br />

Asok L. Rangani Member M Y Y 12 E-G<br />

Minaben D. Pandiya Member F Y Y 10 B<br />

Savitaben H. Rangani Member F Y Y Y 7 A<br />

Manubhai H.Kuvadiya Member M Y Y 12 J<br />

Gelabhai V. Bohriya Member M Y 4 A<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 52


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 31.4: Watershed Committee details (Jasapar)<br />

Sl<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

WC<br />

Watershed<br />

committee,<br />

Jasapar<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Registr<br />

ation<br />

as a<br />

Society<br />

(dd/mm<br />

/ yyyy)<br />

Under<br />

progres<br />

s<br />

Name<br />

Designatio<br />

n<br />

M/<br />

F<br />

S<br />

C<br />

ST<br />

SF<br />

M<br />

F<br />

L<br />

F<br />

Lan<br />

d-<br />

less<br />

U<br />

G<br />

SH<br />

G<br />

G<br />

P<br />

Educa<br />

-<br />

tional<br />

qualif<br />

i-<br />

cation<br />

Function<br />

/s<br />

assigned<br />

#<br />

Govindbhai B.<br />

Bhayani<br />

President M Y Y 5 D<br />

Kishorbhai H. Bhbhti Secretary M Y 10 C<br />

Khodabhai N.<br />

Mudhva<br />

Member M Y Y 4 A<br />

Vasanben J. Bhayani Member F Y Y 12 B<br />

Rohitbhai P. Vasani Member M Y Y 10 I<br />

Yogeshbhai L.<br />

Damsiya<br />

Member M Y Y BA I-G<br />

Daksaben B.Chothani Member F Y Y 5 I<br />

Ranabhai R. Parmar Member M Y Y Y 5 F-B-E<br />

Madhuben M.<br />

Dholariya<br />

Member F Y Y 4 B-H<br />

Manjulaben G. Gosai Member F Y Y 7 E-G<br />

Bhanuben P. Gohel Member F Y Y 4 B<br />

# Functions Assigned, as below<br />

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning<br />

C. Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Accounts D. Signing <strong>of</strong> cheques and making payments<br />

E. Supervision <strong>of</strong> construction activities F. Cost Estimation<br />

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record <strong>of</strong> labour employed<br />

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 53


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

ii) Self Help Group<br />

We believe that the full potential <strong>of</strong> our watershed work can only be raised if it is supplemented by a micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />

programme. This is essential if we are to ensure long-term livelihood security to the poor. We are also convinced that no<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>inance programme can be successful until it is tied up with livelihood programmes such as agriculture, dairying,<br />

marketing and enterprise development etc. Thus micr<strong>of</strong>inance and livelihood programmes are complementary to each<br />

other and their simultaneous implementation is the key to poverty alleviation. Incomes raised through livelihood<br />

initiatives need to be saved. Of these women are the best custodians. Self Help Group are motivated, Small homogenous group<br />

organized together through highly successful <strong>of</strong> credit and thrift activities. These savings must be reinvested in livelihood options<br />

that in turn raise incomes, setting up various cycles. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women,<br />

BPL household, SC/ST women.<br />

SHG initiative in watershed villages is being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous<br />

communities <strong>of</strong> women based on their livelihood separately. With a view point <strong>of</strong> different problems related to rural credit, it was<br />

planned to organize these women into a group consisting <strong>of</strong> 10 to 13 in each groups and it was also proposed to have groups.<br />

Table no. 32: SHG detail<br />

S. No. With<br />

only<br />

Men<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> registered SHGs<br />

With only<br />

Women<br />

With<br />

both<br />

1 12 21 5 32<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> members<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in<br />

each category<br />

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 43 57 110 25 65 90<br />

(ii) SF 15 10 25 15 10 25<br />

(iii) MF 71 63 134<br />

(iv) LF<br />

Total 12 21 5 32 114 120 244 40 75 115 15 10 25<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 54


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

iii) User Group:<br />

These are homogeneous groups <strong>of</strong> persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an<br />

activity or asset on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some <strong>of</strong> the points which were<br />

considered while forming a user group were:<br />

1) In case <strong>of</strong> a check dam all the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the individual check dam were involved as user group members.<br />

2) In case <strong>of</strong> Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> animal husbandry are considered as potential members.<br />

3) Khadi based cottage industry, Papad making user groups for micro enterprise activities<br />

4) Membership was on voluntary and democratic.<br />

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It<br />

was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling <strong>of</strong> ownership with community spirit.<br />

Table No. 33: The following types <strong>of</strong> groups were planned to be formed<br />

S. No Name <strong>of</strong> User Group (land based) Major Task<br />

1 Fuel and fodder Group <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pasture land<br />

2 Farm pond/Percolation tank user Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

3 Farm bund and Check Dam Group Equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

4 Fodder bank Group<br />

5 Nursery Group<br />

Ensure fodder security in village<br />

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> community land for fodder development<br />

Timely supply <strong>of</strong> enriched fodder at a affordable price.<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> nursery plot<br />

Ensure Timely supply <strong>of</strong> seedling for afforestation.<br />

S. No Name <strong>of</strong> other Groups (except land based) Major Task<br />

1 Micro-enterprise developing group Ensuring livelihood opportunities, reducing distress migration<br />

2 Animal Husbandry Group Bringing <strong>of</strong> new AH technology, Management <strong>of</strong> New Cattle and their<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 55


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 33. 1: UG detail (Kharchiya Jam)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 17 23 40 7 6 13 11 4 15<br />

1 27 3 4 34<br />

(ii) SF 51 3 54 2 0 2 3 - 3<br />

(iii) MF 48 4 52 5 1 6 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 10 1 11 - - - - - -<br />

Total 27 3 4 34 126 31 157 14 7 21 14 4 18<br />

Table no. 33.2: UG detail (Panchavada)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 26 28 54 15 6 21 17 16 33<br />

1<br />

32 4 9 45<br />

(ii) SF 134 21 155 11 4 15 4 3 7<br />

(iii) MF 119 8 127 2 - 2 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 16 2 18 1 - 1 - - -<br />

Total 32 4 9 45 295 59 354 29 10 39 21 19 40<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 56


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 33. 3 : UG detail (Jangavad)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 27 22 49 22 18 40 13 18 31<br />

1<br />

34 4 15 53<br />

(ii) SF 169 19 188 4 1 5 - - -<br />

(iii) MF 113 21 134 3 2 5 4 3 7<br />

(iv) LF 31 4 35 1 0 1 - - -<br />

Total 34 5 15 53 340 66 406 30 21 51 17 21 38<br />

Table no. 33. 4: UG detail (Jasapar)<br />

S. No,<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> UGs No. <strong>of</strong> members No. <strong>of</strong> SC/ST in each<br />

category<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> BPL in each<br />

category<br />

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

(i) Landless 24 21 45 18 16 34 23 22 45<br />

1<br />

27 5 9 41<br />

(ii) SF 148 18 166 7 4 11 17 19 36<br />

(iii) MF 131 23 154 3 1 4 - - -<br />

(iv) LF 16 3 19 1 1 - - -<br />

Total 27 5 9 41 319 65 384 29 21 50 40 41 81<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 57


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand <strong>of</strong> the local community. This helps in establishment <strong>of</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong><br />

watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity <strong>of</strong> the village community. A group Discussion was<br />

conducted with watershed <strong>Development</strong> Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.22 lakh in<br />

Kharachiya, 6.54 lakh in Panchavda, 8.93 lakh in Jangvad and 6.75 lakh in Jasapar lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was<br />

conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources and common benefits . It was also taken<br />

into priority and convergences with different departments were also proposed, which will result in sustainability <strong>of</strong> activities.<br />

Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA): Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Kharachiya Jam are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Kharachiya<br />

jam<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Plantation with tree guard (100 nos) 3.22 Lakhs<br />

0.70<br />

Solar light inside the Smasan (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Repair <strong>of</strong> open wells and Deepening 0.82<br />

Books for Library in School 0.09<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (2 nos) 0.40<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

0.20<br />

Animal water trough (Havada) 0.20<br />

Drainage line correction (To prevent flooding Gramtal) 0.32<br />

Plantatio/ Horticulture Convergence With Forest Dept. 0.12<br />

Total<br />

3.34<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 58


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.1: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Panchavda are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Panchavda<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side 6.54 Lakhs<br />

0.70<br />

Dead animal carrying cart 0.10<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (2 nos) 0.40<br />

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Drinking water facility 1.11<br />

Bio-gas plant for demonstration 0.14<br />

Books for Library in School 0.10<br />

Grassland/Gauchar <strong>Development</strong> 0.60<br />

Ro<strong>of</strong> water harvesting 0.45<br />

Wind energy development 0.70<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Pond (Left bank <strong>of</strong> Bhadar river) 0.53<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

Storage tank/Sump for drinking water 1.10<br />

Sanitation facilities/Sewerage 0.35<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Check dam at Kharachiya Road NREGA 0.25<br />

Total<br />

6.79<br />

0.26<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 59


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.2: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jangvad are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Jangvad<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side (78 nos) 8.93 Lakhs<br />

0.55<br />

Solar lights inside the Samsan (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Books for Library in School 0.09<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aqaguard in School (1 nos) 0.20<br />

Drinking water facility dev.(Digging <strong>of</strong> Well 4x4x30 mt<br />

for drinking water, Tank repairing, pipe line laying)<br />

6.70<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

Wind energy development 0.70<br />

Afforestation (Convergence With Forest Dept.) 0.55<br />

Pond deepening (Convergence with NREGA) 0.20<br />

Total<br />

9.68<br />

0.20<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 60


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No. 34.3: Some <strong>of</strong> the major activities proposed in Jasapar are:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Jasapar<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In<br />

lakhs)<br />

Platation with tree guard on Road side (150 nos)<br />

6.75 Lakhs<br />

1.05<br />

Solar lights inside the Samsan & way (2 nos) 0.49<br />

Dead animal carrying cart 0.10<br />

Medicinal Plantation 0.06<br />

Drinking water facility 0.71<br />

Check Dam Repairing near Ashram 2.11<br />

Computer Training to youth/ School Children 0.15<br />

Purifier/ Reverse osmosis Aquaguard in School 0.20<br />

Facilities for Sewerage line Near Old Village 0.35<br />

Ro<strong>of</strong>top Water Harvesting in School 0.45<br />

Demonstration for Agricultural / Animal Husbandry<br />

Productivity Enhancement<br />

0.14<br />

Flood Protection wall (SC farmer) 0.94<br />

Afforestation 0.5 ha (convergence with Forest dept.) 0.55<br />

Total<br />

7.3<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 61


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.35: Details <strong>of</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> villages<br />

Initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

village level<br />

institution<br />

Capacity<br />

building<br />

IEC<br />

activities<br />

Baseline<br />

survey<br />

Hydrogeological<br />

survey<br />

Identifying<br />

technical<br />

support<br />

agencies<br />

Printing<br />

DPR and<br />

Mapping<br />

Estimated<br />

Cost (Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 0.48 2.39 0.97 0.29 0.10 0.48 0.12 4.83<br />

2 Panchavda 0.98 4.86 1.96 0.59 0.20 0.98 0.25 9.81<br />

3 Jangavad 1.34 6.63 2.68 0.80 0.27 1.34 0.33 13.39<br />

4 Jasapar 1.01 5.01 2.02 0.61 0.20 1.01 0.25 10.12<br />

Total 3.82 18.89 7.63 2.29 0.76 3.82 0.95 38.15<br />

4.3.2. Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Works:<br />

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase <strong>of</strong> watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point <strong>of</strong> the<br />

watershed and move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river <strong>of</strong> the<br />

watershed. Work is location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size <strong>of</strong> the stream being treated. The aim is to weave<br />

interventions into the contours <strong>of</strong> nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget <strong>of</strong> 50 percent is allotted for this work.<br />

4.3.2.1 Ridge Area Treatment Plans<br />

In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher<br />

reaches <strong>of</strong> the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed.<br />

Various watershed managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation <strong>of</strong> forest with grasses in upper ridges.<br />

1. Contour Bund/trench<br />

2. Boulder Checks<br />

3. Gabions 4. Grass seedling/planatation<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 62


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1. Contour Bunds/Trench<br />

Contour bund/trenches are a simple, low-cost method <strong>of</strong> checking the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> any watershed. A contour<br />

trench is a trench dug along a contour line. A contour line is an imaginary line that joins together points <strong>of</strong> the same elevation. Digging a<br />

trench along a line that is at the same level increases the chances <strong>of</strong> containing run<strong>of</strong>f for a longer period <strong>of</strong> time within the trench. If<br />

bunds/trenches were not to follow a contour, such digging could actually increase the possibility <strong>of</strong> soil erosion because there would be a<br />

rise in the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f following upon an increase in the slope <strong>of</strong> the land. In the ridge area <strong>of</strong> a watershed a contour bund/trench is a<br />

simple and inexpensive solution to slowing down surface run<strong>of</strong>f and reducing soil erosion.<br />

Objectives<br />

1) Slowing down the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

2) Checking soil erosion<br />

3) Improving local soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

Contour bunds/trenches are constructed in the ridge area <strong>of</strong> a watershed. Rainwater, which falls in this area flow unchecked carrying with it<br />

eroded soil into the flatter portion <strong>of</strong> the watershed - the "valley". This silt gets deposited into reservoirs and ponds, reducing their life.<br />

Thus, any water harvesting work undertaken in the valley will become meaningless unless appropriate measures such as contour trenching<br />

are undertaken to control run<strong>of</strong>f and soil erosion in the ridge. Contour trenches collect the rainwater that falls in the ridge area. This way<br />

the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the area adjacent to the trench is improved.<br />

2. Boulder Checks /Loose Boulder checks<br />

Boulder checks or gully plugs are loose rock dams made on small drainage lines or seasonal streams which have a catchment area <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than 50 ha. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone available with in radius <strong>of</strong> 100-150 m from the site. The main<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> constructing loose boulder checks is to reduce the velocity <strong>of</strong> water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

boulder checks help in:<br />

1. Reducing soil erosion;<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 63


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2. Trapping silt which slows the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />

3. Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration <strong>of</strong> surface run<strong>of</strong>f into the groundwater system; and<br />

4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created downstream on the drainage<br />

line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />

3. Gabions<br />

Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area <strong>of</strong> 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to<br />

reinforce highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim <strong>of</strong> constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity <strong>of</strong> water flowing through<br />

the drainage line. By reducing the velocity <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f, gabion structures help in<br />

1. Reduction in soil erosion<br />

2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate <strong>of</strong> siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches <strong>of</strong> the watershed.<br />

3. Increasing recharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater and<br />

4. Increasing the duration <strong>of</strong> flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity <strong>of</strong> the water harvesting structures created downstream on the<br />

drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 64


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.2 Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting for land development:<br />

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation<br />

or surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more <strong>of</strong> manual labour so schemes like National <strong>Rural</strong><br />

Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.<br />

1. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams<br />

2. Waste Weir<br />

1. Check dams<br />

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness <strong>of</strong> permeable bed or<br />

weathered formation to facilitate recharge <strong>of</strong> stored water within short span <strong>of</strong> time. The water stored in these structures is mostly<br />

confined to stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid<br />

scouring from excess run<strong>of</strong>f water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run <strong>of</strong>f in the stream series <strong>of</strong> such<br />

check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages.<br />

2. Waste weirs<br />

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess run<strong>of</strong>f from the field and also store some amount <strong>of</strong> water in the field. The<br />

water stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 0. 5 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow<br />

over the wall.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 65


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4.3.2.3 Plains or Flat level/Field level:<br />

1. Farm pond<br />

2. Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />

3. Farm bund<br />

4. Afforestation<br />

1) Farm Pond:<br />

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population <strong>of</strong> a village, and farm pond, which<br />

serves an individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters <strong>of</strong><br />

length and width and are built across the flow path <strong>of</strong> natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond.<br />

In some cases a series <strong>of</strong> farm ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs <strong>of</strong> one farm and also augments<br />

ground water recharge. Percolation Dam: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made<br />

on the upper part <strong>of</strong> the catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tubewells located in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the catchment.<br />

Such dams can also be made in the immediate upstream portion <strong>of</strong> wells and tubewells. Depending on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the dam and duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> water storage, the dam can have secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal farmers<br />

and landless labourers.<br />

2) Irrigation/Percolation tank<br />

a) Irrigation Dam: Such dams can be constructed to meet two different kinds <strong>of</strong> demands.<br />

• <strong>of</strong> storing water during the rainy season to be used for irrigation in the post-monsoon period.<br />

• <strong>of</strong> providing protective irrigation during dry spells within the rainy season. Most parts <strong>of</strong> India typically receive rainfall<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 66


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

between June and September, very intensely within a few hours and a few days. The number <strong>of</strong> rainy days does not average<br />

more than 40-50. Moreover, rains are extremely erratic, <strong>of</strong>ten characterised by late onset and early withdrawal. Prolonged<br />

dry spells during the rainy season, resulting in agricultural droughts, are also frequent. Hence, the kharif crop needs to be<br />

drought-pro<strong>of</strong>ed through 'protective' irrigation, applied to overcome accumulated soil moisture deficits within the rainy<br />

season. Such structures are especially important in areas which are poor in groundwater resources and which do not have<br />

access to canal irrigation. Such areas form about half <strong>of</strong> India's agricultural area.<br />

b). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part <strong>of</strong><br />

the catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the catchment. Such dams can also be<br />

made in the immediate upstream portion <strong>of</strong> wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the dam and duration <strong>of</strong> water storage, the<br />

dam can have secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security <strong>of</strong> marginal farmers and landless labourers.<br />

3) Farm bund<br />

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim <strong>of</strong> arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Ideally, bunds<br />

on farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular<br />

sections. In such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing. Due to these<br />

4. Afforestation<br />

Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use <strong>of</strong> available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be <strong>of</strong> similar<br />

species or mixed in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout <strong>of</strong> the area and the soil<br />

conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 67


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in Kharachiya Jam (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Village<br />

name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

structures<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 5 7.50 1341 0.55 5 7.50 1350 0.55 15.00 2691 1.10<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation<br />

1 Kharachiya Tank<br />

3 21.29 54000 0.82 25.29 54000 0.82<br />

(iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum check 5 34.54 39000 4.28 18 217.99 105000 19.04 262.53 144000 23.32<br />

dam<br />

Total 13 63.33 94341 5.65 23 225.49 106350 19.59 302.82 200691 25.24<br />

Table no.36.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Panchavda (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 4 6.22 1200 0.44 11 18.86 2970 1.21 25.08 2950 1.65<br />

(ii)Percolation Tank 4 67.87 11000 2.54 1 11.20 5756 2.36 99.07 12800 4.90<br />

1 Panchavda (iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum 5 91.62 51500 7.46 21 287.20 125000 28.40 378.82 246500 35.86<br />

check dam<br />

Total 13 165.71 63700 10.44 33 337.26 133726 31.97 502.97 262250 42.41<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 68


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jangavad (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Village<br />

Proposed target<br />

S.<br />

name<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

No.<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

structures<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 3 5.35 900 0.33 12 18.86 3240 1.32 24.21 4140 1.65<br />

(ii)Percolation Tank 3 76.42 10500 2.90 1 32.20 12100 4.96 108.62 22600 7.96<br />

1 Jangavad (iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum 11 95.32 66500 8.01 32 224.32 140700 54.46 789.64 207200 62.47<br />

check dam<br />

Total 17 177.09 77900 11.24 45 275.38 156040 60.74 922.47 233940 72.08<br />

Table no.36.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Jasapar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 2 10.08 1100 0.22 15 16.30 4050 1.65 23.38 5150 1.87<br />

1 Jasapar<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation<br />

2<br />

Tank<br />

59.32 9500 2.36 1 29.36 3950 3.01 88.68 11650 5.37<br />

(iii) Check dam &<br />

Causeway cum check 5 149.54 7500 3.96 24 378.35 22800 38.90 727.89 30300 42.86<br />

dam<br />

Total 9 218.94 18100 6.54 40 422.01 25750 43.56 839.95 47100 50.10<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 69


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.36.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in cluster <strong>IWMP</strong>-III (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

S. Village<br />

No. name<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

structures<br />

Area to<br />

Storage Estimated<br />

be<br />

No. capacity cost<br />

irrigated<br />

(Cumec) (Lac)<br />

(ha)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> new structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Storage<br />

Estimated<br />

capacity<br />

cost<br />

(Cumec)<br />

Area to<br />

be<br />

irrigated<br />

(ha)<br />

Total target<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Lac)<br />

(i) Farm Pond 14 26.57 4700 1.54 43 56.52 5100 4.73 85.67 9800 6.27<br />

(ii)<br />

(ii)Irrigation/Percolation 12 228.90 85000 13.54 2 92.76 7250 10.82 321.66 92250 24.36<br />

Tank<br />

(iii) Check dam<br />

/Causeway cum check<br />

dam<br />

26 441.02 164500 23.71 95 1717.86 73350 140.80 2158.88 898000 161.50<br />

Total 52 696.49 254200 38.79 140 1867.14 85700 153.34 2566.21 1000050 192.13<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 70


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)<br />

Proposed target<br />

Augmentation/ repair <strong>of</strong> Construction <strong>of</strong> new<br />

Total target<br />

S.<br />

existing recharging structures recharging structures<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Villages Type <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

No.<br />

Area to be<br />

Area to be<br />

Area to be<br />

Estimated<br />

Estimated<br />

Estimated<br />

No. irrigated<br />

No. irrigated<br />

irrigated<br />

cost<br />

cost<br />

cost<br />

(ha)<br />

(ha)<br />

(ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam Open wells 1 0.5 0.09 1 0.5 0.11 1.05 0.22<br />

(i)Open wells 2 1 0.18 8 10 0.88 11 1.06<br />

2 Panchavda (ii)Bore wells 1 2 0.15 2 0.15<br />

Total for the village 2 1 0.18 9 12 1.03 13 1.21<br />

(i)Open wells 8 10 0.85 10 0.85<br />

3 Jangvad<br />

(ii)Bore wells 2 1.7 0.30 1.7 0.30<br />

(iii) Dyke 1 0.5 0.75 0.5 0.75<br />

Total for the village 11 12.5 1.9 12.5 1.9<br />

(i)Open wells 8 10 0.85 10 0.85<br />

4 Jasapar (ii)Bore wells 2 2.5 0.30 2.5 0.30<br />

Total for the<br />

Project<br />

Total for the village 10 12.5 1.15 12.5 1.15<br />

3 1.5 0.27 31 37.5 4.19 39.05 4.48<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 71


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas<br />

S. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam<br />

2<br />

Panchavda<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

Major activities <strong>of</strong> the SHGs<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> SHGs<br />

involved<br />

Average annual income from<br />

activity per SHG (In Rs. Approx)<br />

Vermi composting 1 76800<br />

Nursery raising 1 10000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 5 100000<br />

Bharat Guntha unit making 1 110000<br />

Fodder/date palm 2 26000<br />

Dairy Unit 2 114950<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Turmeric Plot 1 74700<br />

Vermi composting 4 109000<br />

Nursery raising 5 50000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 5 100000<br />

Papad unit making 2 197100<br />

Fodder Bank 1 75830<br />

Dairy Unit 1 160300<br />

Floriculture 2 188000<br />

Lemon Plot 2 169792<br />

Cumin spices, turmeric packaging 1 45000<br />

Mandap services 1 125000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 72


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3 Jangavad<br />

4 Jasapar<br />

Vermi composting 5 240000<br />

Nursery raising 1 50000<br />

Handicraft/Immitation 3 90000<br />

Papad/Pickle unit making 3 146400<br />

Centering/Masoning instruments 3 175000<br />

Fodder Bank 4 227500<br />

Dairy Unit 2 22900<br />

Milk products 2 90000<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Vermi composting 4 109000<br />

Nursery raising 6 65000<br />

Handicraft/Charkha Udyog 1 90000<br />

Papad unit making 2 146400<br />

Fodder Bank 4 227500<br />

Dairy Unit 3 35000<br />

Floriculture 1 89675<br />

Lemon Plot 1 84896<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 73


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 39: Other activities <strong>of</strong> watershed works phase – Proposed target<br />

S. No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

villages<br />

Nonconventional<br />

Well<br />

Any other<br />

Ridge area Drainage line Nursery Land Crop Pasture<br />

Total<br />

treatment treatment raising development demonstrations development<br />

Estimated cost<br />

energy Recharge<br />

(Rs. In lakhs)<br />

(ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (ha) (lakh) (no) (lakh) (ha) (lakh)<br />

1 Kharachiya 21 3.49 252.6 27.01 - - 780 10.34 - - - - 1 0.22 41.06<br />

(Jam)<br />

2 Panchavda 15 7.65 393.82 40.56 147 31.04 - - 1.5 1.45 - - 13 1.21 81.91<br />

3 Jangavad 8 9.04 799 64.25 137 37.25 - - - - 12.5 1.9 112.44<br />

4 Jasapar 19 7.4 733.03 48 564.06 25.92 - - 2.4 3.36 - - 12.5 1.15 85.83<br />

Table no.40: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Kharachiya (Jam)<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (i) Ridge<br />

area (R)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

(ii)<br />

Drainage<br />

line<br />

(D)<br />

(iii)<br />

Land dev<br />

(L)<br />

(i)<br />

Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Communit<br />

y<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 74<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units Estimated cost (Rs.<br />

(No./ cu.m./ in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

rmt)<br />

M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous<br />

ContourBund/Trench<br />

R C WC 91 0.04 Apr-2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 115 3.45 May 2011<br />

Gabion structure D C WC 2 1.74 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P C UG/WC 30 2.75 Jan 2011<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 12000 4.84 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding Con<br />

L P UG/WC 1930 0.83 May-2013<br />

(NREGA)<br />

Nala Plug D P UG/WC 3 1.49 Dec-2013<br />

Gully plug D P C UG/WC 2 0.46 Dec-2013<br />

Total: 15.6


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.i: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Panchavada<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i) (ii)<br />

(i) UG<br />

(i) Ridge Drainage<br />

Others<br />

Land dev Private<br />

y<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Communit (ii)SHG<br />

area (R) line<br />

(pl.<br />

(L)<br />

(D)<br />

specify)<br />

Boulder checks R P C WC 253 7.59 May 2011<br />

Continuous CT R C WC 150 0.06 Jay-2011<br />

Gabion structures D C WC 4 3.39 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.57 Jan 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 47043 19.77 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding<br />

Target<br />

Estimated cost (Rs.<br />

Expected<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />

(No./ in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

cu.m./ rmt) M W O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

L P UG/WC 357 0.15 Jan-2012-13<br />

NREGA<br />

Nala Plug D P C UG/WC 2 1.05 Feb-2013<br />

Gully Plug D UG/WC 1 0.26 Jun-2011<br />

Afforestation/Planta<br />

tion/Demonstaration<br />

C Pasture WC 1 ha 1.45 May 2011<br />

Total: 38.29<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 75


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.ii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jangvad<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (i) Ridge<br />

area (R)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

(ii)<br />

Drainage<br />

line<br />

(D)<br />

(iii)<br />

Land dev<br />

(L)<br />

(i)<br />

Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Communit<br />

y<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Target<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> units Estimated cost<br />

(No./ cu.m./ (Rs. in lakh)<br />

rmt)<br />

MW O T<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous Contour<br />

Bund<br />

R C WC 91 0.04 May 2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 250 7.50 Jay-2011<br />

Gabion structures R D C WC 2 1.50 May 2012<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.58 Jan 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P C UG/WC 55000 22.83 May-2012-13<br />

Farm bunding<br />

L P C UG/WC 1000 0.23 Jan-2012-13<br />

Conv. with NREGA<br />

Nala Plug D UG/WC 3 1.34 Feb-2013<br />

Gully Plug D UG/WC 5 0.44 Jun-2011<br />

Total: 38.46<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 76


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 40.iii: Details <strong>of</strong> engineering structures in watershed works: Jasapar<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

Target<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Estimated cost<br />

Expected<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> structures (iii) (i) (ii)<br />

(i) UG No. <strong>of</strong> units<br />

(i) Ridge Drainage<br />

Others<br />

Land dev Private<br />

y<br />

(iii) WC rmt)<br />

Communit<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

month & year<br />

(ii)SHG (No./ cu.m./<br />

area (R) line<br />

(pl.<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(L)<br />

(D)<br />

specify)<br />

MW O T (mm/yyyy)<br />

Continuous CB R P C WC 454 0.20 May-2011<br />

Boulder checks R C WC 190 5.80 May 2011<br />

Gabion structures D P C WC 3 2.95 Jay-2011<br />

Waste weir L P UG/WC 50 4.58 May 2012<br />

Farm bunding L P UG/WC 30750 12.60 Jan 2012<br />

Nala Plug D P UG/WC 3 1.31 May-2012-13<br />

Gully plug D UG/WC 2 0.88 Jan-2012-13<br />

Flood Protection<br />

wall (SC farmer)<br />

L P C UG/WC 150 1.5 Feb-2013<br />

Affforestation L Pasture WC/UG 2.4ha 3.36 Jun-2011<br />

Affforestation<br />

(Convergence with R L C PIA/WC 1 ha 1.4 May 2011<br />

Forest dept.)<br />

Total: 34.58<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 77


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.1: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />

Earthen Contour Bund/Trench<br />

Particulars Unit Value<br />

Top width 0.3<br />

U/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />

D/S Slope 1: 1.5<br />

Max. height 0.75<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> contour Bund/Trench per ha. per row 100<br />

Spacing <strong>of</strong> two Contour Bunds 10<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Rows per Ha. 1000.0<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Contour Bund 1.06875<br />

Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork in contour bund 1068.75<br />

Rate For E/W in S<strong>of</strong>t soil 41.00<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> contour bund per meter. 44<br />

Table No 40.2: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Boulder checks<br />

Chainage Height Area <strong>of</strong> X-Section<br />

Average .area <strong>of</strong> x-<br />

Section Length Quantity<br />

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2 0.65 1.49 0.74 2 1.49<br />

4 0.84 2.36 1.92 2 3.85<br />

5 1.00 3.25 2.81 1 2.81<br />

6.5 0.83 2.31 2.78 2 4.17<br />

7 0.00 0.00 1.15 1 0.58<br />

Total 7 12.89<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 78


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Cost Estimate For Boulder Check<br />

Particulars Unit Value Rate<br />

Total Length Mt 7<br />

Max. height Mt 1<br />

U/S Slope 1: 2.5<br />

D/S Slope 1: 3<br />

Top Width Mt 0.5<br />

Quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Cum 12.89<br />

Add15% for Keying & Exit weir Cum 1.93<br />

Total quantity <strong>of</strong> Boulder Cum 14.82 600<br />

Unit Cost <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check Rs 8892<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 79


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

L -Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check-2<br />

Height<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.6<br />

-0.8<br />

-1<br />

-1.2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Series1<br />

-0.65<br />

Series2<br />

-0.84<br />

-0.83<br />

-1<br />

Distance<br />

Distances<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

1.875<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> Boulder check-2<br />

0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25<br />

-0.25<br />

-0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

-2.2<br />

-2.77<br />

-2.74<br />

-3.25<br />

2.35<br />

Chainage<br />

2.75<br />

2.325<br />

Cross Section <strong>of</strong> Boulder Check<br />

Height<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

U/S<br />

1:1<br />

D/S 1:3<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Distance<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 80


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.3: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Gabion structures<br />

Dimension for Construction & Costing <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />

S.<br />

no Particulars Measurement Unit<br />

1 Length <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 6.0 Meter<br />

2 Height <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

3 Top Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

4 Bottom Width <strong>of</strong> Head Wall 2.0 Meter<br />

5 Width <strong>of</strong> Apron 2.0 Meter<br />

6 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Apron 0.6 Meter<br />

7 Length <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 4.0 Meter<br />

8 Height <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 2.0 Meter<br />

9 Thickness <strong>of</strong> Side Wall 1.0 Meter<br />

10 Length <strong>of</strong> Key Wall 6.0 Meter<br />

11 Total Length <strong>of</strong> Structure 20.0 Meter<br />

12 Steps (V:H) 0.5 :1<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 81


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Gabion Structure<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1<br />

Below head wall and for Apron in<br />

H.S. 1 8.0 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />

1.2 For Key in H.S. 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />

Total Excavation 34.2 Cum. 41.00 1402.2<br />

2 Construction<br />

2.1 Head Wall 1 6.0 1.5 1.0 9<br />

2.2<br />

Below head wall and for Apron in<br />

H.S. 1 8 4.0 0.6 19.2<br />

2.3 Key Wall 2 6.0 1.0 1.25 15.0<br />

2.4 Side Wall 2 4.0 1 1.5 12<br />

55.2 Cum. 1225.00 67620<br />

Total Cost 69022<br />

Grand Total 69069.35<br />

Cost Estimation say 69100.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 82


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.4: Technical Details/Estimates <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund<br />

Estimate <strong>of</strong> cost : Farm Bunding<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Top width 0.6 Mt<br />

U/S Slope 1: 1<br />

D/S Slope 1: 1<br />

Max. height 0.75 Mt<br />

Bottom Width 2.1 Mt.<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> cross section <strong>of</strong> Farm Bund 1.0125 Sq mt<br />

Qty. <strong>of</strong> earthwork <strong>of</strong> Farm bund /Meter 1.0125 Cumec<br />

Rate /cumec 41.00 Rs.<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> Farmbunding per mt. 41.41 RS<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 83


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No 40.5. Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Nalla/ Gully Plug<br />

Sr.No. Item Qty. Rate Unit Amount (Rs.)<br />

1 Excavation for Foundation 16.07 41.00 Cu.m. 658.67<br />

2 P.C.C (1:4:8) 2.30 1460.00 Cu.m. 3350.70<br />

3 U.C.R in C.M (1:5) 22.83 1330.00 Cu.m. 30363.90<br />

4 C.C (1:2:4) Coping 1.53 2420.00 Cu.m. 3702.60<br />

5 Cement Plaster 12mm. Th.(1:3) 31.30 74.00 Sq.m. 2316.20<br />

6 Earthen Work 176.72 41.00 Cu.m. 7245.32<br />

TOTAL Rs. : 47,637<br />

Table No 40.6 Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Farm Pond<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Pond Length 15.00 Mt.<br />

Pond Width 10.00 Mt.<br />

Pond Depth 1.80 Mt.<br />

Side Slope 2 : 1<br />

Pond Top Area 204 Sq. mt<br />

Pond bottom area 104 Sq mt.<br />

Quantity 270 Cum<br />

Cost/cum in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 41 Rs<br />

Total cost 11070 Rs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 84


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.7. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Percolation Tank<br />

Particulars Value<br />

Structure Length 50 Mt.<br />

Structure Breadth 50 Mt.<br />

Structure Height 2.00 Mt.<br />

Top Cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />

Tank bottom cross sectional area 2500 Sq Mt.<br />

Excavation in s<strong>of</strong>t soil 5000 Cumec<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Excavation 41 Rs.<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> tank according to dimension 205000 Rs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 85


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.8. Technical details <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Check dam<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1 Body wall 1 20.0 1.46 1.4 40.88 Cu.mt.<br />

1.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.40 50.40<br />

1.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 1.40 8.40<br />

1.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 1.40 7.00<br />

1.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 1.40 3.80<br />

2 1:4:8<br />

Total Excavation 110.47 Cum. 41.00 4529.55<br />

2.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 0.15 4.38<br />

2.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.15 5.40<br />

2.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.15 0.90<br />

2.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.15 0.75<br />

2.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.15 0.41<br />

3 U C R Masonary 11.837 Cum. 1460 17281.73<br />

3.1 Body wall 1 20.00 1.46 1.25 36.50<br />

3.2 Body Wall s/s 1 20.00 1.13 0.90 20.34<br />

3.3 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 1.15 41.40<br />

3.4 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 2.65 15.90<br />

3.5 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 3.45 17.25<br />

3.6 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 4.43 12.00<br />

143.391 Cum. 1330.00 190709.50<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 86


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

4 1:2:4<br />

4.1 Body wall 1 20.00 0.80 0.10 1.60<br />

4.2 Appron 1 20.00 1.80 0.10 3.60<br />

4.3 Side wall 2 5.00 0.60 0.10 0.60<br />

4.4 Abutment 2 2.50 1.00 0.10 0.50<br />

4.5 Wing wall 2 2.26 0.60 0.10 0.27<br />

4.6 End sill 1 20.00 0.30 0.30 1.80<br />

5 Plastering<br />

Body wall S/S 1 20 1.00 20.00<br />

Body wall D/S 1 20.0 1.45 29.00<br />

Abutment 4 2.00 1.9 15.2<br />

CC 8.371 Cum. 2420.00 20258.3<br />

Wing wall 4 2.3 1.45 13.34 Sq.Mt.<br />

77.54 74.00 5737.96<br />

5 Earthen work<br />

5.1 R – Bank 1 15.0 2.20 1.20 39.60<br />

5.2 L – Bank 1 16.0 2.20 1.20 42.24<br />

15% Shrinkage Minus 12.28<br />

81.84<br />

69.564 Cum. 2852.12<br />

Cum. 241369.2<br />

Total Cost Say 241370.00<br />

Grand Total 241370.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 87


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no 40.9. Technical details & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> Waste weir<br />

Quantity & Cost Estimation <strong>of</strong> waste weir<br />

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

1.3<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

2 U C R Masonary<br />

3 1:2:4<br />

3.1<br />

3.2<br />

4 Plaster<br />

Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Appron 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Bodywall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Appon 1 4.00 1.00 0.45 1.80<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Body Wall 1 4.00 0.45 0.45 0.81<br />

Abutment 2 2.00 0.45 0.75 1.35<br />

Total Excavation 3.42 Cum. 41.00 140.22<br />

Total U C R masonary 5.58 Cum. 1330.00 7441.40<br />

L.S. 1.00 4.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />

R.S. 2.00 2.00 0.45 0.10 0.18<br />

4.1<br />

1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />

4.2<br />

1.00 4.00 0.40 1.60<br />

4.3<br />

1 4.00 0.45 1.80<br />

4.4 1.00 4.00 0.45<br />

1.80<br />

4.5<br />

4.00 1.00 0.60 2.40<br />

4.6<br />

2 0.45 0.60 0.54<br />

Pipe 4 .45 1.8<br />

0.36 Cum. 2420.00 871.20<br />

9.73<br />

Sq.mt. 74.00 720.02<br />

Rmt<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 88


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.8 50.00 90.00<br />

Total Cost<br />

Grand Total 9152.84<br />

Cost Estimation say 9152.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 89


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Kharachiya Jam<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation L C PIA/WC 0.85 2049 0.82<br />

Jatropha L C WC/SHG 1 2500 0.34<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 2 1.90<br />

Horticulture R D L P UG 1.67 186 0.65<br />

Nursery raising D L P C SHG 2 10000 0.20<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L D L P UG/WC 3 1.69<br />

Lemon L WC/SHG 0.9 400 1.05<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 1 17500 0.93<br />

Total 12.42 32635 7.58<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 90


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.1: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Panchavda<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Panchavda<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L C WC 1 2100 1.45<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 2 2500 0.65<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C WC/SHG 6 8300 2.90<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 5 2.81<br />

Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400 2.6<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 0.50<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 3 0.60<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 2.5 10 1.80<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.51<br />

Lemon plot C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 35000 1.88<br />

Total 36.17 80715 18.31<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 91


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.2: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jangvad<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Jangvad<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L C WC 0.5 1000 0.55<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 2 2500 0.65<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C WC/SHG 0.25 78 0.55<br />

Fodder R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />

Horticulture R L P UG 1.67 7400<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 25000 0.50<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 5 1.52<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 8 2.23<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.51<br />

Lemon plot C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 48000 3.75<br />

Total 39.42 84383 14.22<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 92


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.41.3: Details <strong>of</strong> activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Jasapar<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

S.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> (i) (ii) (iii)<br />

(iii) (ii)SHG<br />

No<br />

village structure/ work Ridge Drainage Land (i) (ii) Others (iii)<br />

.<br />

area line dev. Private Community (pl. Others<br />

(R) (D) (L)<br />

specify) (pl.<br />

specify)<br />

1 Jasapar<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

No.<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

plants<br />

Target<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Afforestation R D L P C PIA/WC 4.00 4000 5.31<br />

Jatropha R L P C WC/SHG 4 10000 1.30<br />

Agro-forestry D L P C PIA/WC 0.25 150 1.05<br />

Fodder/Phoenix R L C UG/SHG 7 1.35<br />

Nursery raising D L P UG/SHG 5 30000 0.60<br />

Peasture Land<br />

L P C SHG 5.00 5 0.26<br />

Demostration<br />

Grassland<br />

development<br />

R D C WC/SHG 4 1.52<br />

Crop<br />

demonstration<br />

L P UG/WC 4.5 2.56<br />

Turmeric Plot L UG/SHG 2 1.52<br />

Lemon plot P C UG/SHG 1 400 1.35<br />

Floriculture L P UG/SHG 2 48000 1.88<br />

Total 38.75 92555 18.7<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completio<br />

n (mm/<br />

yyyy)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 93


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No, 41.i, Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Afforestation Activities<br />

Particulars Value Unit<br />

Crop Name Ailanthus<br />

Plant To Plant Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />

Row to Row Spacing 8.00 Mt<br />

Pit Length 1.00 Mt<br />

Pit Width 1.00 Mt<br />

Pit Depth 1.00 Mt<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 156 Nos.<br />

Plantation Area 10.00 Ha.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for ha 1,560 Nos.<br />

Gap Filling 20 %<br />

Table No, 41. ii , Cost Estimation for afforestation activity<br />

S. No. Description No. Lengt Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />

h(m.) (m.) (m.)<br />

1 Digging <strong>of</strong> pits for plants in Ordinary murum 1,560 1 1 1 Cum 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

2 Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area, sapling<br />

not less than 30 cm. height<br />

1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

3 Transportation <strong>of</strong> plants from nursery to camp site upto 5Km 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

4 Loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> plants 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

5 Rehandling <strong>of</strong> plants from camp site to actual planting site 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 1 1560<br />

upto 20Omt.<br />

6 Cost <strong>of</strong> fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 10 15600<br />

7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year] 1,560 Nos. 1,560.00 2 3120<br />

Total 54600<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 94


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Bio-Gas<br />

The idea is to use cattle dung and kitchen s<strong>of</strong>t waste and waste water to produce bio gas in a bio reactor. The unmanaged cattle dung can be<br />

managed properly if fed into a bio reactor. The reactor produces bio gas which is about 60% methane and 40 % carbon dioxide along with<br />

traces <strong>of</strong> other gases. This is used as cooking fuel and for lighting in some cases in place <strong>of</strong> traditional inefficient wood and kerosene stove.<br />

Biogas is a clean and efficient fuel. Because <strong>of</strong> the biogas the need for collecting firewood is avoided. The cooking is speeded up and time<br />

on cooking is reduced. Women have spare time to take care <strong>of</strong> their children and their education. A portion <strong>of</strong> their spare time is spent on<br />

sustainable income generating activities.<br />

Impact on natural resources<br />

· Reduction <strong>of</strong> pressure on the forest, as the families will use less wood (or no wood at all) to cook. There is an important deforestation in<br />

the district, and villagers, who went 2km from the village to collect wood.<br />

· Restoration <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

The chemical fertilizers are damaging the soil fertility, and the annual crop yields are decreasing. Studies have shown that when vermincompost<br />

is used, the crops increased <strong>of</strong> 13%.<br />

· Control <strong>of</strong> local water contamination<br />

Leaching <strong>of</strong> organic wastes and chemical fertilizers can occur when they are not managed. It will manage organic wastes and reduces the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers these risks are lessened.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 95


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No, 41.iii: Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Bio-gas<br />

Detailed Cost Estimate for a 3 Cum Capacity Bio-gas<br />

S<br />

No Particulars Unit No L W H/D Qty Rate Amount<br />

1 Excavation <strong>of</strong> pit for main Tank ( Digester) Cum 1 22/7X2X2X1.5 18.84<br />

i Extra Excavation for round shape <strong>of</strong> Digester Tank Cum 1 4/3X22/7X2X2X.5 8.37<br />

ii Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundation for Fedder Tank Cum 1 22/7X0.8X0.8X0.5 1.00<br />

iii Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundation for slurry Tank Cum 1 2.5 1.5 0.5 1.88<br />

30.09 41 1233.82<br />

2 PCC in 1:2:4 cement Concrete<br />

i In bottom <strong>of</strong> the main Digester Tank 3" thick Cum 1 22/7X2X2X0.075 1.88<br />

ii In bottom <strong>of</strong> the Feeder Tank 3" thick Cum 1 22/7X0.8X0.8X0.075 0.15<br />

iii In bottom <strong>of</strong> the slurry tank 3" thick Cum 1 2.5 1.5 0.075 0.28<br />

2.32 2420 5604.65<br />

3 Brick Work in 1:5 cement mortar<br />

i for construction <strong>of</strong> digester tank dom Cum 1 0.63<br />

ii for construction <strong>of</strong> feeder tank Cum 1 0.20<br />

iii for construction <strong>of</strong> slurry tank Cum 1 0.88<br />

4 Plastering <strong>of</strong> the surface in 1:4 cement mortar 1.71 2280 3896.43<br />

i Digester from Inside and outside Sqm 1 3/2X22/7X1X1 4.71<br />

ii Feeder tank from inside and out side Sqm 1 5.02<br />

iii Slurry tank from inside and outside Sqm 1 17.6<br />

27.33 74 2022.72<br />

Fixing <strong>of</strong> GI pipe nipple 1" dia and 20cm long on top <strong>of</strong><br />

5 digester dome Job 1 1 150 150<br />

6<br />

Providing <strong>of</strong> gas burner+ HDPE pipe 1/4" +1/2" gate<br />

valve+Hose Nipple, Hose Clamp unit 1 1 1860 1860<br />

Total Constructional Cost in Rs. 14767.61<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 96


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Feeder Tank<br />

610mm<br />

LINE DIAGRAM OF BIOGAS PLANT MODEL<br />

Outlet Gas Pipe M<br />

S O<br />

Out Let tank<br />

Initial Slurry Level K<br />

R1 R2<br />

150 mm dia Acc Pipe F Initial Slurry Level<br />

O Opening 600<br />

mm<br />

Digester Tank A 12mm thick Plaster<br />

500 mm<br />

T thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

Masonry Centre<br />

B<br />

600 I<br />

P and C Thickness <strong>of</strong> Concrete at bottom<br />

D<br />

SECTIONAL ELEVATION<br />

L<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 97


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Agriculural Improvement programme<br />

Our understanding is that without addressing the crucial area <strong>of</strong> end-use regulation, no amount <strong>of</strong> rainwater harvesting is going to work.<br />

For this the most important requirement is the working out <strong>of</strong> a sustainable package <strong>of</strong> practices for dryland agriculture. This is moreover<br />

an alternative to the Green Revolution, which largely bypassed the drylands or is completely inappropriate for them. It is believed that the<br />

economy must be viewed as a sub-system <strong>of</strong> the larger eco-system, which comprises not merely human beings but also natural resources<br />

and non-human species.<br />

The watershed village area has seen penetration <strong>of</strong> Green Revolution (GR) inputs in agriculture, which is the main occupation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people. Cotton that was the main crop <strong>of</strong> the area is becoming completely unviable because <strong>of</strong> high pesticide costs. Despite excessive use<br />

<strong>of</strong> pesticides, pestilence remains an intractable problem. The inputs available to them are <strong>of</strong>ten sub-quality. For example, local dealers<br />

dispose <strong>of</strong> expired pesticides to illiterate farmers. Farmers are in general suffering because <strong>of</strong> high input costs. However, their problem is<br />

that they perceive no alternative to the GR package. What is worse, the catchment areas have suffered severe denudation <strong>of</strong> forest cover in<br />

recent years. This has raised the rate <strong>of</strong> soil erosion and surface run<strong>of</strong>f. Biodiversity has also been adversely affected. There is a fodder and<br />

fuel crisis in the area. In the recent 3-year drought, the worst impact was on cattle. Within this context, our attempt (see Figure below) is to<br />

forge several new links within the elements <strong>of</strong> the natural resource base <strong>of</strong> the area (climate, rainfed agriculture, wastelands, forests, and<br />

crop residues, animal and human wastes and decentralized energy sources). With soil and water conservation technologies, surface run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

is minimised which improves the level <strong>of</strong> soil moisture. Loss <strong>of</strong> essential soil nutrients is also reduced. And harvested run<strong>of</strong>f is recycled to<br />

agricultural land through water harvesting structures. The utilisation <strong>of</strong> soil moisture through vegetative systems strengthens the flows <strong>of</strong><br />

fodder, firewood. Non-woody biomass from the regenerated forests and commons, as well as part <strong>of</strong> the crop residues, is returned to the<br />

soil through microbial decomposition. Revegetation <strong>of</strong> the commons also provides material for direct incorporation into soil as green<br />

manure. Animal wastes are directed to biogas plants, from which bio-energy is supplied either to the households for cooking. The organic<br />

residue from the biogas plant (digested slurry) goes to enrich the soil as a nitrogen- rich fertiliser.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 98


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

These are the major components in the agricultural programme to be carried out in the Programme:<br />

• Seed distribution<br />

• Seed multiplication<br />

• Screening <strong>of</strong> new varieties<br />

• Popularisation <strong>of</strong> a package <strong>of</strong> agricultural practices<br />

• Floriculture<br />

• Horticultural plantation<br />

• Non Pesticide Management<br />

• Vermicomposting<br />

• Phoenix/date-palm plantation along the stream banks on farm bunds<br />

• Jatropha plantation along fencing and on wastelands<br />

• Afforestation<br />

Our effort has been to introduce a complete alternative to hybrid seeds and the Green Revolution package and practices as listed above. As<br />

a trial <strong>of</strong> the recommended practice <strong>of</strong> intercropping <strong>of</strong> different crops, farmers <strong>of</strong> the project area were chosen for Front Line<br />

Demonstrations (FLDs). These demonstrations attempt to make certain type <strong>of</strong> crop varieties popular again by showing the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

intercropping with a cash crop. The model, thus, attempts to show the households the possibility <strong>of</strong> getting some extra cash income while<br />

ensuring food security. In collaboration with ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Junagarh Agricultural University, KVK-Targharia and Kutch, Rajkot,<br />

we will carry out trials <strong>of</strong> composite varieties <strong>of</strong> different crops as trail or demonstration plot. Seeds <strong>of</strong> varieties identified as suitable to the<br />

area will be disseminated to more than 100 farmers in watershed villages.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 99


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The Livestock <strong>Development</strong> Programme<br />

Many new initiatives in the field <strong>of</strong> veterinary care, fodder development, training programmes will be taken up that will bring the<br />

two villages in the diary map. Many <strong>of</strong> theses initiatives yielded results much beyond what we had hoped to achieve, however the year was<br />

also one <strong>of</strong> introspection in terms <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a the leap in dairy development that we were expecting from the old routes.<br />

Loans to SHG members/UG groups<br />

The special loans for purchase <strong>of</strong> cattle will be made available to members in the location. Members will be given loans before the<br />

summer season. Members have to procure good quality animals. Veterinary support services will be provided by the veterinary hospitals<br />

and in animal husbandry camps. Accordingly members will be selected by the criteria fixed by the group. Breeds suitable for the area will<br />

be brought.<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> a Risk Fund<br />

The livestock development programme will set up a risk fund to take care <strong>of</strong> an accidental death <strong>of</strong> the animals. Members who avail<br />

<strong>of</strong> cattle loans will contribute some amount towards a risk fund. In the event <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> the animal during the loan repayment period,<br />

money pooled in the risk fund can be used to help the member repay the loan outstanding.<br />

Veterinary Services<br />

Veterinary services will be provided in the cluster villages. The cluster was chosen for the reason that most families in the area are<br />

landless or near-landless. They are highly dependent on small ruminants like cows, buffaloes and other cattle. Vaccination camps will be<br />

conducted time to time against chronic diseases in the larger animals. The location also will be provided with successful Artificial<br />

insemination (AI) services, relying on the supplies provided by the government veterinary hospital in Jasdan.<br />

The pregnant cow care programme was a concept borrowed from the Vasudhara Dairy, Valsad, <strong>Gujarat</strong>. This will be launched with<br />

the primary aim <strong>of</strong> demonstrating that the productivity <strong>of</strong> the local cows could be increased with appropriate feeding practices. Within this<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 100


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

programme, veterinary pr<strong>of</strong>essionals would first identify local cows which are pregnant and have around two more months to go before<br />

parturation. Once the animals were identified and if the owner was willing the animals were put on an intensive feeding and care<br />

programme for a three month period, from the start <strong>of</strong> the programme to one month after parturition. The cost per animal works out to Rs.<br />

3700.The farmer would contribute the dry fodder and green fodder, in kind. Towards the costs <strong>of</strong> inputs procured from the market (works<br />

out to Rs. 1350), the costs were borne in the ratio 60:40 between WCs and the farmer. Farmers from the project villages will be motivated<br />

to participate in the programme.<br />

Training and Exposure visits<br />

A large group <strong>of</strong> people, consisting mainly <strong>of</strong> women dairy farmers who will take loans for purchase <strong>of</strong> cattle, will visit the<br />

successful dairy cooperatives under the Vasudhara dairy, Valsad and the Panchmahal dairy, Godhra. These cooperatives were chosen<br />

mainly for the reason that many <strong>of</strong> the successful dairy farmers in these areas are small farmers belonging to various tribal communities.<br />

These dairies had also built up their business on the hard work <strong>of</strong> women farmers who had taken loans from the SHGs run by the<br />

cooperative union to buy cattle. The interaction will be helpful as dairy co-operative members in other district will make them to<br />

understand how those women, with a similar background, had been able to build up a good livelihood option revolving around the dairy.<br />

Training addressing the issue <strong>of</strong> infertility in animals will be provided to beneficiary group. Three day training cum exposure visit will be<br />

organized for the team and some farmers to the BAIF organization. The visit will provide a first hand view <strong>of</strong> the options open to dryland<br />

farmers to ensure the availability <strong>of</strong> good quality fodder. The farmers who had adopted such practices demonstrated how it could help in<br />

cutting down the cost <strong>of</strong> feed concentrates.<br />

One day training on azolla cultivation, as a means <strong>of</strong> providing high protein feed to livestock, will be organized by KVK. Scientist<br />

from the KVK, will demonstrate the simple method by which azolla could be grown in the backyard <strong>of</strong> farmers. Demonstration pits are<br />

expected to set up in the demonstration plot <strong>of</strong> farmers.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 101


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Kharachiya Jam<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Kharachiya<br />

Jam<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 0.40 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 1.25 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp (5 times) Community 0.50<br />

Oct,Nev-<br />

2011-12-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (96 units) Private SHG 0.82 Oct-2011<br />

Business/Training/Charkhi Private UG/SHG 4.00 Mar-2012<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) in 1 ha Community WC/UG 0.34 Jul-2012-13<br />

Vermi Composting-8 unit Community UG 0.80 Nov-2012<br />

Biogas 1 unit (convergence with<br />

GEDA)<br />

Community 8.74 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention:16.85, but 8.74 lakh will be contributed by GEDA<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Fodder grass/Phoenix Private Community 1.90 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demo./Organic Agriculture Private UG/SHG 1.67 May-11<br />

Nursery raising (2 units) Community SHG 0.2 Jan-2011-12<br />

Floriculture (1 ha) Private Community SHG 0.93 Sep-2012<br />

Turmeric Plot (0.5 ha) Private SHG 0.37 Oct-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits ( 100 units) Private SHG 1.15 Aug-2012<br />

Handi craft/Bharat Gunthan Community UG/SHG 1.19 Oct-2012<br />

SHG revolving fund/Training Community SHG 1.1 Nov-2012<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.25 Dec-2011<br />

Lemon/Guava Plantation (1 ha) Private Community UG/WC 1.05 Jun-2011<br />

Plantation <strong>of</strong> Horticulture(1861no) Private 0.65 Jun-2011<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Microenterprise and Production systems: 10.46 lakhs<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 102


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.1: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities:Panchvda<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong><br />

village<br />

1 Panchvda<br />

2 Panchvda<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii)<br />

Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month &<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants/Honey bee Private 2.25 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 2.70 Feb-2011-12<br />

AnimalCamp/Ag demonstration Community 2.00<br />

Oct,Nev-<br />

2011-12-13<br />

Mandap services/Craftman ship 1.54 Oct-2011<br />

Business/Training/Shop/Others Private UG/SHG 3.5 Mar-2012<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 2 ha Community WC/UG 0.65 Jul-2012-13<br />

Fodder/Date palm 0.90 Nov-2012<br />

Vermi Composting (1 units) Community UG 2.81 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 16.35<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Crop demonstration Private Community WC/UG 1.80 Jun-2011-12<br />

Horticultural/Medicinal<br />

Private Community UG 2.6 May-11<br />

Plantation/Grafted Bor/Sitaphal<br />

Organic Agriculture (1 ha) Private PIA/UG/SHG 0.89 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (5 unit) Community SHG 0.50 Sep-2012<br />

Kitchen garden Kit (219 units) Private PIA/SHG 1.86 Oct-2012<br />

Floriculture (2 ha) Private Community SHG 1.88 Aug-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Private UG/SHG 1.51 Mar-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

flouring and packaging<br />

Private SHG 0.90 Oct-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits (90 units) Private SHG 0.71 Nov-2012<br />

Papad making unit (3) Community UG/SHG 1.08 Dec-2011<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 103


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Handi craft/Charkha Udyog UG/SHG 0.67 Jun-2011-12<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 2.2 May-11<br />

Dripkits/Machinaries<br />

demonstration/new seed Private Community UG/SHG 1.45 Jan-2011-12<br />

varieties demonstration<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 Sep-2012<br />

Fodder unit (5 ha) Community UG 1.91 Oct-2012<br />

Total: 21.43<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 104


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.2: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jangvad<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

1 Jangvad<br />

2 Jangvad<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii) Others<br />

(pl.<br />

specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 105<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 1.5 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 2.5 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp/AI/Exposure (12) Community PIA 2.5 Oct 2012-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (124 units) Private PIA/SHG 0.98 Oct-2011<br />

Fodder grass/Date palm Private UG/WC 1.35 Mar-2012<br />

Business/Training/Others Private UG/SHG 10.95 Jul-2012-13<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 2 ha Community WC/UG 0.65 Nov-2012<br />

Moti para instruments UG/SHG 1.90 Apr-2012<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 22.33<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Vermi Composting (2 units) Community UG 2.5 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demonstration Private Community PIA/WC/UG 2.23 May-11<br />

Organic Agriculture (3 ha) Private UG/SHG 2.67 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (5 unit) Community SHG 0.50 Sep-2012<br />

Floriculture (4 ha) Private Community SHG 3.75 Oct-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Community UG/SHG 1.51 Aug-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

flouring and packaging/Milk<br />

production unit<br />

Private Community SHG 2.83 Mar-2012<br />

Veterinary Kits (120 units) Private SHG 0.94 Oct-2012<br />

Papad making/Pickle unit Community UG/SHG 2.8 Nov-2012<br />

Handicraft/ /Immitation/Centering Private UG/SHG 2.52 Dec-2011<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 3.00 Jun-2011-12<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.90 May-11<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 Jan-2011-12<br />

Fodder unit (4) Community UG 1.52 Jan-2011-12<br />

Total: 29.02


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.42.3: Details <strong>of</strong> allied / other activities: Jasapar<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Jasapar<br />

Jasapar<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

(i) Private<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(ii)<br />

Community<br />

(iii) Others<br />

(pl. specify)<br />

Executing<br />

agency<br />

(i) UG<br />

(ii)SHG<br />

(iii) WC<br />

Estimated<br />

cost<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 106<br />

Target<br />

Expected<br />

month & year<br />

<strong>of</strong> completion<br />

(mm/yyyy)<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Small ruminants Private 1.8 Apr-2011-12<br />

Animal Husbandary/Dairy unit Private UG/SHG 3.3 Feb-2011-12<br />

Animal Camp/AI/Exposure (12) Community PIA 2.25 Oct12-13<br />

Kitchen garden Kits (185 units) Private PIA/SHG 1.57 Oct-2011<br />

Fodder grass/Date palm Private UG/WC 1.35 Mar-2012<br />

Business/Training/shop/Others Private UG/SHG 4.40 Jul-2012-13<br />

Jatropha (bio-fuel) 4 ha Community WC/UG 1.3 Nov-2012<br />

Mandap services/Craftman ship UG/SHG 0.90 Apr-2012<br />

Community Bio-gas<br />

(Convergence with GEDA)<br />

Community GEDA PIA/WC 8.74 Apr-2011-12<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> Livelihood Intervention: 25.61, (8.74 lac, GEDA)<br />

Production System and Microenterprise <strong>Development</strong><br />

Vermi Composting (1 units) Community UG 2.81 Jun-2011-12<br />

Crop demonstration Private Community PIA/WC/UG 2.56 May-11<br />

Organic Agriculture (3 ha) Private UG/SHG 2.67 Jan-2011-12<br />

Nursery raising (6 unit) Community SHG 0.60 Sep-2012<br />

Floriculture (2 ha) Private Community SHG 1.88 Oct-2012<br />

Turmeric plot (2 ha) Community UG/SHG 1.52 Aug-2012<br />

Cumin, Spices and turmeric<br />

Private SHG 0.90 Mar-2012<br />

flouring and packaging<br />

Veterinary Kits (40 units) Private SHG 0.31 Oct-2012<br />

Papad making unit (4 unit) Community UG/SHG 1.28 Dec-2011<br />

Handi craft/Charkha Udyog Private UG/SHG 1.33 Jun-2011-12<br />

SHG revolving fund Community SHG 2.3 May-11<br />

Drip kits Private Community SHG 0.90 Jan-2011-12<br />

Lemon Plantation Community UG/WC 1.35 July 2011<br />

Fodder unit (4 ha) Community UG 1.52<br />

Total: 21.93


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Livelihood Intervention<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect <strong>of</strong> empowerment. Although it is extremely<br />

difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both on-farm<br />

and <strong>of</strong>f-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster <strong>of</strong> villages are motivated to take<br />

part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.<br />

Advantages <strong>of</strong> Agro-Based Activities: While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the following reasons:<br />

1. Target groups are acquainted with most <strong>of</strong> the basic skills.<br />

2. Easy access to inputs.<br />

3. No problems <strong>of</strong> marketing, as most <strong>of</strong> the outputs are locally consumed as food.<br />

4. As over 50-60 % <strong>of</strong> the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy<br />

capital investment.<br />

5. Risk <strong>of</strong> failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances <strong>of</strong><br />

success are high.<br />

6. Infrastructure required for promotion <strong>of</strong> on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in<br />

backward regions, which are deprived <strong>of</strong> regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap<br />

all the opportunities to promote various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income<br />

generation activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable<br />

interventions to enhance the production. There are also excellent opportunities to improve post production management <strong>of</strong> the produce<br />

through grading, storage, processing and marketing.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 107


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list <strong>of</strong> micro-enterprises taken up by various<br />

SHGs is presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, Khadi making units and food processing.<br />

However, over a period <strong>of</strong> time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supercede the trade as many individuals participate in<br />

enhancing their production at the family level and try to organize themselves to market them collectively. Other activities such as<br />

production <strong>of</strong> utility items, construction related activities, handicrafts and Moti work find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketing<br />

infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.<br />

Support Needed for Promotion <strong>of</strong> Micro-enterprises<br />

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.<br />

1. Motivation <strong>of</strong> the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers<br />

2. Formation <strong>of</strong> Self Help Groups and their Federations<br />

3. Gender sensitization<br />

4. Training and capacity building<br />

5. Micro-finance. Provision <strong>of</strong> credit facilities and linkage with banks<br />

6. <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing<br />

7. Trade networking and establishment <strong>of</strong> market outlets<br />

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination <strong>of</strong> technologies, procurement <strong>of</strong> inputs, training <strong>of</strong><br />

members and establishment <strong>of</strong> linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as and when<br />

needed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 108


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they<br />

should be:<br />

• economically viable<br />

• environmentally sustainable<br />

• socially equitable<br />

• energy efficient<br />

• employment generation<br />

Production System-1: Papad production units<br />

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The essence<br />

to empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for them<br />

to earn higher income in order ton improve their standard <strong>of</strong> living. This objective could be accomplished by establishing enterprises that<br />

are based on the locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 10-20 members,<br />

will be motivated and proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality <strong>of</strong> their own lives<br />

as well as the lives <strong>of</strong> those around them.<br />

Introduction<br />

Papad is delicious snack. It is consumed at homes, restaurants, hotels, etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed in all functions.<br />

Traditionally this activity was confined to household papad making but in view <strong>of</strong> increasing demand and availability <strong>of</strong> machinery<br />

(mechanisation) it has now been developed in cottage and small scale sector. Enterprise can be started by 2 family members and optimum<br />

machinery.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 109


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Market<br />

Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in big centers in cities like Morbi and Maliya miyana <strong>of</strong><br />

Rajkot areas. There is a good demand for papads because it is a food product and commonly consumed commodity in all households and<br />

hotels. Women entrepreneurs can gainfully take up this papad unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network is necessary<br />

to sell in bulk quantities.<br />

Manufacturing Process<br />

Generally weighed quantity <strong>of</strong> floor is taken in a mixer. A solution <strong>of</strong> common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

water and the contents are kneaded at maximum speed to get a homogenous lump <strong>of</strong> the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is<br />

divided into balls. These are pressed into circular discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting material to prevent stickiness. The papads are<br />

usually dried. After drying, it is packed in various size packing. Lot <strong>of</strong> 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be<br />

manufactured from different varieties <strong>of</strong> pulses or there could be a combination <strong>of</strong> pulses as well. Ingredients required for Papad making<br />

are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate, flour <strong>of</strong> Arhar dal.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 110


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Process flow chart <strong>of</strong> Papad making<br />

Dough formation from various ingredients<br />

Making small balls from dough<br />

Pressing<br />

Sun Drying<br />

Sealing and Packing<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 111


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production Capacity<br />

Monthly approximately 250 kg papad can be produced.<br />

Static Capital Investments:<br />

A) Land/Infrastructure :<br />

A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 150 Sq. Ft. carpet area.<br />

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.<br />

Sr.<br />

Particular Nos. Price (Rs.)<br />

No.<br />

B) Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.<br />

1 Flour Mill with electric motor 1 17000.00<br />

2 Set for Papad making 1000.00<br />

3 Other instruments 1000.00<br />

4 Installation, foundation etc. 3000.00<br />

Total : - 22000.00<br />

C) Office Furniture etc.<br />

1 Cup board 3000.00<br />

D) Capital Investment<br />

Raw Material and wages <strong>of</strong> labour 3000.00<br />

Grand Total :- 28000.00<br />

Production Cost (Monthly)<br />

1 Raw Material 3500.00<br />

2 Power fuel charge 200.00<br />

3 Packing 100.00<br />

4 Depreciation Cost 200.00<br />

5 Repair, Storage etc. 100.00<br />

6 House Rent 250.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 112


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

7 Others 100.00<br />

Total : - 4450.00<br />

Total Production (Monthly)<br />

1. Papad 250 Kg X Rs. 32/Kg 8000<br />

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)<br />

Monthly Selling income 8000<br />

Production Cost 4450<br />

------------<br />

Total monthly income will be Rs. 3550 3550<br />

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project villages,<br />

and the scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by the near<br />

by villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is shown below<br />

Training Content<br />

A. Theoretical<br />

• Introduction to different types <strong>of</strong> papads.<br />

• Tools and Equipments used in papad making.<br />

• Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavour.<br />

• The processes involved in papads making.<br />

• The hygiene aspects associated with food products.<br />

• Market development.<br />

• Addresses <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> raw materials, & packaging materials.<br />

B. Practical<br />

• Raw materials for papad making – the quality and variety.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 113


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.<br />

• Dough making and the value addition in the form <strong>of</strong> flavour.<br />

• Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes.<br />

• Papad & Chips making – Practical<br />

• Drying and preservation<br />

• Cost considerations and waste reduction.<br />

• Pricing & packaging<br />

Production System-2: Dairy Buffalo Farming<br />

Estimated Project cost for Dairy Buffalo farming <strong>of</strong> one unit<br />

Farming is a complex, multi-component, interactive process that is dependant in land, animal, human and natural resources as well as<br />

capital investment. Sustainable agriculture embraces all such aspects <strong>of</strong> farming system. Small and marginal land holders can reap the<br />

benefit. In this context live stock is an important component.<br />

Dairy farming scheme can be taken up in the semi-urban, village and near highway villages, for the sake on transportation, breeding and<br />

marketing facilities. Since milk is an easily perishable item, it is to be immediately consumed or sold, so the farms needs to be located in<br />

the consuming centre itself. The scheme provides for purchase <strong>of</strong> one milch animal, construction <strong>of</strong> byre, feeding equipments and water<br />

tank. Cost <strong>of</strong> feed for one year and the insurance premium for the first year has also been capitalised. The recurring expenditures include<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> feed and medicines, water and electricity charges and insurance fees. The concentrated feeds will be supplemented with green<br />

grasses and fodder tree leaves.<br />

A. Non – Recurring Expenditure:<br />

1. Construction <strong>of</strong> Byre (Cowshed) and feed Godown @ 50 Sq.ft. floor / Buffalo @ Rs. 100 per Sq.ft : Rs. 10000.00<br />

2. Cost <strong>of</strong> Water Storage Tank L.S.: Rs. 2,000.00<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 114


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

3. Cost <strong>of</strong> equipments i.e. watering trough, milk can, Basin etc. @ Rs. 1125/- per animal<br />

---------------------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 13125.00<br />

---------------------------------------------------------<br />

B. CAPITALISED EXPENDITURE:<br />

1. Cost <strong>of</strong> one dairy buffalo @ Rs. 35,000/- (including transportation)<br />

2. Veterinary Aids, Medicines, Vaccination, Breeding charge etc. @ Rs. 500/- per animal per year<br />

3. Cost <strong>of</strong> Feed for one year @ Rs.8 Kg/ buffalo/ day, @ Rs. 10/- per Kg. conc.: Rs. 29,200.00<br />

4. Insurance premium @ 6.5% <strong>of</strong> original cost for 1 Nos. <strong>of</strong> Buffalo. : Rs. 1,950.00<br />

5. Water & Electricity charges @ Rs. 30 per buffalo per month: Rs. 360.00<br />

---------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 67,010.00<br />

---------------------------------------------<br />

C. Total Investment Cost:<br />

i.e. A + B = Rs. 13125.00 + Rs. 67,010.00 = Rs. 80135.00<br />

D. Gross Income (for the first one year):<br />

1. Sale <strong>of</strong> 2700 lits. <strong>of</strong> milk average 10 lits./ animal / day for 270 days @ Rs. 20 per lit. <strong>of</strong> milk: Rs. 54000.00<br />

2. Sale <strong>of</strong> manure (dung) @ Rs. 550 per cow per year<br />

3. Sale <strong>of</strong> empty Gunny bags: Rs. 450.00<br />

----------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 55000.00<br />

----------------------------------------------<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 115


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

E. Cost <strong>of</strong> expenditure for one year: (to be continued by the beneficiary)<br />

1) Cost <strong>of</strong> concentrated feed @ 8 Kg/ cow/ day @ Rs. 10/ per Kg. for 365 days: Rs 29,200.00<br />

2) Cost <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Aids, medicines, etc. @ Rs. 500/- per animal per year<br />

3) Water & Electricity charge @ Rs. 30 per animal per month: Rs. 360.00<br />

4) Insurance premium @ 6.5 % <strong>of</strong> original Cost: Rs. 1950.00<br />

-----------------------------------------------------<br />

Total: Rs. 32,010.00<br />

-----------------------------------------------------<br />

F. Net Income (for first one year)<br />

i.e. D – E = Rs. 55000.00 - Rs. 32010.00 = Rs. 22,990.00<br />

Note: Assuming the farmer maintaining the same strength <strong>of</strong> the herd or may add one more animal and at the same production trend, the<br />

account statement <strong>of</strong> 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year will be more.<br />

Assumption and Technical norms<br />

1. Cost <strong>of</strong> one Dairy Buffalo: Rs. 35,000.00<br />

2. Floor space: 50 sq.ft. per cow.<br />

3. Feed consumption: 8 Kg. concentrate 25 Kg. fodder per day<br />

4. Feed price : Rs. 10/- per Kg. ( concentrate feed )<br />

5. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> milk : Rs. 20 per litre.<br />

6. Manure Production : 5 tonnes per animal per year.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 116


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

7. Sale <strong>of</strong> Manure : Rs. 550<br />

8. Lactation period : 270 days per year.<br />

9. Average dry period : 95 days.<br />

10. Land : Considered available free <strong>of</strong> cost.<br />

Production System-3: Fodder bank for Watershed villages<br />

Introduction:<br />

"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide<br />

fodder for livestock sector." It provides a wide range <strong>of</strong> animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good<br />

and sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> income in many areas. Through the dairy cooperative societies, farmers will be supplied with seeds <strong>of</strong> bajra,<br />

multi-cut jowar and cowpea for the summer season; multi cut bajra, multi cut jowar and maize for the kharif season and bajra and berseem<br />

for the rabi season. The demand for fodder seeds was the highest for the rabi season. Farmers cite the availability <strong>of</strong> green grass in<br />

abundance during the rains as a reason for their not devoting acreage solely for fodder during the kharif season. The accent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme during the year was to get across the message <strong>of</strong> growing a mixture <strong>of</strong> fodder crops providing complete nutrition for the<br />

animals. The success <strong>of</strong> the programme lay in making available quality fodder seeds to farmers. One aspect where we could have done<br />

better was in getting farmers to try out a mix <strong>of</strong> fodder crops and devote needed acreage to growing fodder for their animals. The fodder<br />

bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration <strong>of</strong> the people resulting in sustainable livelihood<br />

opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 117


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank:<br />

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder during drought and scarce situation. .<br />

2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in<br />

association with dairy co-operatives.<br />

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.<br />

4. Undertake the distribution <strong>of</strong> fodder seeds and slips in the village.<br />

Primary problem <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

In Panchavada cluster\s villages come under 80% rainfed agriculture and soil is very suitable for fodder crop mainly<br />

Jowar,Bajara,Mainge and sorghum. So fodder bank play an important role to improve fodder for cattles to solve this problem. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

farmers own more than 3 ha <strong>of</strong> land for food and fodder production but lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient irrigation water has made these lands<br />

unproductive. The concept <strong>of</strong> fodder bank can overcome the problem <strong>of</strong> seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal performance.<br />

It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods <strong>of</strong> drought, due to lack <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong> sufficient fodder and<br />

water. As a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search <strong>of</strong> fodder and green pastures to other parts <strong>of</strong> the state. This<br />

eventually leads to colossal loss <strong>of</strong> income generating assets, poor demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> village and low education level <strong>of</strong> their<br />

children.<br />

Even in good years, during harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is<br />

higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices<br />

during the months <strong>of</strong> scarcity.<br />

To meet the critical needs <strong>of</strong> fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer<br />

months, fodder banks are proposed to be setup at both the village level.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 118


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Fodder Bank:<br />

A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Kharachiya,Panchavada,Jangvad and Jasapar watershed area.<br />

The number and type <strong>of</strong> cattle as well as the fodder production capacity <strong>of</strong> the village was collected during door to door survey. In focused<br />

group discussion several factors like the various types <strong>of</strong> fodder available locally, the quantity <strong>of</strong> fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> fodder bank, the amount <strong>of</strong> finances required to operate a fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and<br />

Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that, the sale price <strong>of</strong> fodder should cover operating costs and<br />

losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member <strong>of</strong> operating fodder bank.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 119


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table 42.i .Primary Model for A Fodder Bank<br />

A<br />

Total Dairy farmers 39<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> adult animals<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> calves<br />

299 36<br />

Total 335<br />

Fodder requirement per day (10kg dry fodder for adult<br />

and 5 kg for calf).<br />

Fodder requirement for 180 days.<br />

Fodder available from lands/farms/pasture land (60%)<br />

Fodder expected from community land<br />

5025 Kg<br />

9045 quintal<br />

5427 quintal<br />

20 hac *150=3000 quintal<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production (See Table:2) 105000 Rs<br />

3618-3000=618 quintal<br />

Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg.<br />

procurement rate in harvesting season, Rs.500 per Qt.<br />

500*618= Rs.309000/-<br />

including transportation *.Net Cost <strong>of</strong> Fodder Production<br />

"K' (cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation + Cost <strong>of</strong> procurement)<br />

B. Area development for fodder bank Land required Approx. Rs 12000<br />

3500 m 2 (preferably land will be allotted by Gram<br />

Panchayat @ Rs.600 per month)<br />

C. Cl. Fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + Other tools. Rs.70,000/-<br />

D.<br />

Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B)<br />

Rs. 3,91,000/-<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 120


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no: 42.ii: Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation for fodder production<br />

Cost Detail<br />

Unit cost<br />

1. Cost for tillage 4.5 hour*20 hec*400 Rs 36000<br />

2. Cost for seed 12 kg seed *20 hec *100 Rs 24000<br />

3. Cost for fertilizer Rs 20,000<br />

4. Cost for irrigation<br />

Rs 15,000<br />

R5. Depreciation cost Rs 10,000<br />

Total cost for 20 hec Rs. 105,000<br />

Table No. 42.iii, Revenue and return Details.<br />

S. No Return Details Cost (in Rs.)<br />

1 Cost <strong>of</strong> fodder Per Kg<br />

= 3,91,100/309000<br />

1.26 Rs/kg<br />

2. Selling Price <strong>of</strong> Fodder Rs 2 /Kg<br />

3. Net selling Price Rs. 723600/-<br />

4. Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Rs 227500/-<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Fodder:<br />

We will produce 3000 quintal fodder from community land <strong>of</strong> Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two<br />

ways first one buy the fodder at the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as<br />

well as private agency.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 121


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Technical Support/Assistance:<br />

To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning <strong>of</strong> activities the required technical assistance may be taken from<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU.<br />

Advantages:<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in the<br />

village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:-<br />

> It will reduce migration during drought condition.<br />

> Farmers can purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions<br />

at the city market.<br />

> It can reduce in overall market prices <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season.<br />

> Ensure availability <strong>of</strong> fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices.<br />

> Reduced distress sale <strong>of</strong> cattle due to non -availability and / or non-affordability <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />

> Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season<br />

> Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage <strong>of</strong> fodder.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 122


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System - 5: Vermi composting unit for Project villages<br />

Introduction:<br />

The wide spread problems <strong>of</strong> soil degradation and desertification are threatening agricultural sustainability. Throughout the project village<br />

large populations <strong>of</strong> domestic animals producing large amounts <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. These organic residues, or ‘waste materials’, can be<br />

transformed more quickly and into a more useful vermi-compost, available for urban and land application. Nutrients within vermicomposted<br />

material are readily available to plants, and can be added to agricultural land to improve soil structure and fertility or used as<br />

good quality and marketable additive to potting soil or plant growth media. The process <strong>of</strong> composting crop residues using earthworms<br />

comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1 m wide and 0.3 m high beds <strong>of</strong> required length. Earthworms are<br />

introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> 20 - 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and<br />

give out a part <strong>of</strong> the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.<br />

Objectives<br />

• To train farmers / SHGs in organic farming and vermi-culture.<br />

• To promote production <strong>of</strong> vermi-castings as a viable small business venture<br />

About The Worms<br />

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some <strong>of</strong> the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The<br />

worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi-composting units are ideally suited to<br />

locations / units with generation <strong>of</strong> considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age <strong>of</strong> about six weeks<br />

lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out <strong>of</strong> each capsule. Thus, the multiplication<br />

<strong>of</strong> worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and<br />

dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source <strong>of</strong> protein (70%) for use in animal feed.<br />

Location<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 123


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Kharachiya, Panchavada, Jangvad and Jasapar villages have lots <strong>of</strong> animal so it can become good composting center as well as good source<br />

<strong>of</strong> livelihood. Vermicompost is very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

product in per unit area.<br />

Market/Use<br />

Vermi compost is a valuable input for sustainable agriculture and wasteland development. This also can be used widely in pot culture and<br />

in home gardens. Several farmers are successfully using vermi-comost. Vermi compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and<br />

fertilizer so by the use <strong>of</strong> compost we can reduce the use <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizer. Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding capacities <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Components <strong>of</strong> A Commercial Unit<br />

Sheds<br />

Shed is necessary as the temperature in summer is high. We can make it by the use <strong>of</strong> concrete pillars because this will act as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent wetting <strong>of</strong> beds due to rain on a windy day. While designing the sheds adequate<br />

room has to be left around the beds for easy movement <strong>of</strong> the labour attending to fill and harvest the beds.<br />

Vermi-beds<br />

Scientific bed size proposed here is 10mt by 1 mt by 0.3 mt. The whole bed area should be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform<br />

height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more<br />

that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre <strong>of</strong> the bed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 124


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Land<br />

About 750 square meter <strong>of</strong> land is required to set up a vermi compost production unit in each village. It should have at least one super<br />

structure to cover the 40 beds. It should have an arrangement for watering and other equipments as required because moisture is very<br />

essential for compost production. Land can be taken from Gram panchayat on lease <strong>of</strong> at least 10-15 years.<br />

Seed Stock<br />

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate <strong>of</strong> 350 worms per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bed space over a period <strong>of</strong> 6 month to a year.<br />

Fencing<br />

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the stray animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length<br />

<strong>of</strong> the periphery <strong>of</strong> the farm.<br />

Water Supply System<br />

We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system <strong>of</strong> conveying<br />

and applying the water to vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and<br />

saving on water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs<br />

on hand watering and proves economical in the long run. The cost <strong>of</strong> these items depends on the capacity <strong>of</strong> the unit and the type <strong>of</strong> water<br />

supply chosen.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 125


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Machinery<br />

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermisheds,<br />

loading, unloading, collection <strong>of</strong> compost, loosening <strong>of</strong> beds for aeration, shifting <strong>of</strong> the compost. Costs <strong>of</strong> providing necessary<br />

implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost.<br />

Table: 42.iv Model <strong>of</strong> a Vermi-compost Unit for 40 beds <strong>of</strong> Dimension (10mt*1mt*0.3mt)<br />

S. No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)<br />

1 Super Structure construction with truss with fencing 128750<br />

2 Shade net for covering the ro<strong>of</strong> 750 sqrt mt. 25 18750<br />

3 Binding wire for tying 200 Kg 50 10000<br />

4 Labour charges for erection <strong>of</strong> sheds 100 100 10000<br />

5 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets etc 15000<br />

6 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2500 2500<br />

7 Cow dung @ 80kg/m3 96 qtl 250 24000<br />

8 Worms 200 kg 70 14000<br />

9 Formation <strong>of</strong> vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 50000<br />

10 Miscellaneous - - 3000<br />

11 Training 5000<br />

12 Total cost - - Rs. 281000<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 126


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.v: Returns from vermicomposting<br />

Benefits<br />

1. Sale <strong>of</strong> vermin compost <strong>of</strong> 120 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton 120*3000=360,000 Rs<br />

2. Sale <strong>of</strong> worms @ 5 kg per ton <strong>of</strong> compost and Rs. 50 per kg 600*50=30,000 Rs<br />

3.Total<br />

3,90,000 Rs/-<br />

Net benefit<br />

1,09,000 Rs/-<br />

Training will be provided to all the stakeholders by KVK and VVK, Rajkot which can be divided in to two categories and shown below.<br />

A. Theoretical<br />

• Introduction to Organic Farming<br />

• Need and the importance <strong>of</strong> Organic farming<br />

• Introduction to Composting methods<br />

• Vermi-culture<br />

• Earth Worms, nature, identification and selection<br />

• Vermi-castings<br />

• Vermi-compost<br />

• Marketing Avenues<br />

• Application <strong>of</strong> vermicomposting<br />

• Addresses <strong>of</strong> the suppliers <strong>of</strong> worms.<br />

B. Practical<br />

• Production Methods<br />

• Raw Materials<br />

• Site and the type <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure<br />

• Tank<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 127


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Vermi-bed<br />

• Harvest<br />

• Quality Analysis<br />

• Storage & Packaging<br />

• Dos and Don’ts<br />

Production System – 6 Khadi based industries<br />

Collaboration with Udyog Bharti<br />

Demands for cotton textile and readymade garments are on the rise in the state. Incentive Plan was envisaged to step up measures<br />

like charting upgraded designs, supplying looms and ancillary inputs, building up centres complete with facilities conducive to the trade,<br />

assistance in advertisement and marketing etc.<br />

To empower and create opportunities for empowerment in the project villages by creating a new skill, we have a collaboration with<br />

Udyog Bharti, which mainly is a Khadi based Industry situated in Gondal Taluka, Rajkot.<br />

Udyog Bharti is a statutory organisation engaged in promoting and developing Khadi and village industries for providing<br />

employment opportunities in the rural areas, thereby strengthening the rural economy <strong>of</strong> the distict. It undertakes activities like skill<br />

improvement, transfer <strong>of</strong> technology, research & development, marketing, etc., in the process <strong>of</strong> generating employment/self-employment<br />

opportunities in rural areas. Training will be provided by Udyog Bharti to around 150 women from the project villages for Khadi<br />

products/stitching and patch work products for 3 months.<br />

Training Content<br />

1. Simple Charkha Operation<br />

2. Twisting <strong>of</strong> yarn <strong>of</strong> different count<br />

3. Repair and maintenance and general operation <strong>of</strong> the machine.<br />

4. Training to keep them updated with latest trends as per changes in design<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 128


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

5. Productions<br />

6. Account handling<br />

Expected Impact, Outcome and Outputs: The impact <strong>of</strong> such activities is to increase the participation <strong>of</strong> woman, SC, BPL and young<br />

people in economic activities. The outcome <strong>of</strong> the model is to develop micro enterprise development program based on proven models<br />

which can be implemented through the clusters project villages. The outputs included: (i) establishment <strong>of</strong> pilot micro enterprises in<br />

producing khadi based design and providing services, (ii) establishment <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> good practices in women micro enterprise development<br />

(iii) trained and well informed women beneficiaries on micro enterprise development, and (iv) an implementation plan for further rollout <strong>of</strong><br />

micro enterprises.<br />

In order to provide insurance cover to Khadi artisans, a scheme <strong>of</strong> group insurance in the name <strong>of</strong> Khadi Karigar will be provided with a<br />

premium <strong>of</strong> just Rs 100.The premium will be shared as Rs. 50 central government social security fund, Rs. 25/- by Khadi Institution and<br />

Rs. 12.50/- each by Khadi artisan and KVIC. The compensation payable under this scheme, Rs. 30,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> natural death, Rs.<br />

75,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> accidental death, Rs. 75,000/- in case <strong>of</strong> full permanent disability due to accident, and Rs.37,500/- in case <strong>of</strong> part<br />

permanent disability due to accident.<br />

The strategy <strong>of</strong> reducing poverty by focusing on development <strong>of</strong> rural micro enterprise is innovative. The project will introduce changes<br />

and innovations <strong>of</strong> demonstrated effectiveness in approach, organization and processes, which today constitute a proven strategy for<br />

supporting rural micro enterprise.<br />

In particular, empowering micro entrepreneurs to set their own priorities and identify their own needs is an innovation that <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

significant strategic potential and lays the foundation for an inclusive, participatory and dynamic process <strong>of</strong> rural development.<br />

Governance<br />

• Monthly meeting<br />

• Accent to co-operatives account to members<br />

• For any policy or resolution to be passed<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 129


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

• Enhanced control due to<br />

-Self management<br />

-Democratic member control<br />

-One member one vote<br />

Membership criteria<br />

1) The Charkha (machine) will be provided by Udyog Bharti after registration <strong>of</strong> the member and paying the minimum contribution<br />

amount (Different subsidy for different group)<br />

2) Minimum age for a member should be 18 years.<br />

3) Ready to work in 7-8 hours in a day and complete the given task fortnightly.<br />

4) The Charkha will be handed over to next member if found unsatisfactory work, to the next member paying the contribution amount<br />

By-laws <strong>of</strong> SHGs groups will be valid.<br />

Capital Requirement and Finance<br />

Ambar Charkha (will be provided by Khadi Udyog): 9400 x 50 members = 470000<br />

Training and Administration: 10000 x 4 months = 40000<br />

Room Rent: 700 per month = 2800<br />

Training and Exposure: = 24000<br />

Total: 66800<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 130


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System – 7: Turmeric Cultivation<br />

Turmeric (Curcuma longa) is used as spice, dye and in cosmetic industry. It is an erect, perennial herb grown as an annual crop. Turmeric<br />

will be grown in the cluster villages as a rainfed crop depending on location. It comes up well under sparse shade also and can be grown as<br />

an intercrop. The Agro climatic condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> is ideal for cultivation <strong>of</strong> turmeric. As small cottage industries are on the increase<br />

where drying, processing and grinding <strong>of</strong> turmeric can be done, there is tremendous scope in increasing the area under turmeric further. It<br />

is therefore, proposed to cover an area <strong>of</strong> 2 Ha. @ Rs. 75,600/- per Ha. totaling a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.52 lakhs during the project period in two<br />

villages namely Panchavada and Jasapar. Details <strong>of</strong> cost estimate and year wise physical and financial break-up is given below.<br />

Table No-42.vi: Economics <strong>of</strong> turmeric cultivation in 1ha. Area<br />

1 Cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation Rs 75600/-<br />

2 Production 15 MT<br />

3 Minimum sale rate Rs. 15/- per Kg<br />

4 Gross income ( 2x3) Rs. 2,25,000/-<br />

5 Net pr<strong>of</strong>it (4-1) Rs. 149400/-<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 131


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

SI No. Particulars Qnty Rate Amount<br />

A-1 Turmeric Seed rhizomes 15 Qtls. Rs.4000/- Rs 60000/-<br />

2 Organic Manure 6 Qtls. Rs.1200/- Rs.7,200/-<br />

3 Tools & Implements - - Rs.500/-<br />

4 Transportation <strong>of</strong> seed rhizomes organic - - Rs.400/-<br />

SUB – TOTAL Rs.68100/-<br />

B-1 Land Preparation<br />

2 Layout 5 MD Rs.100/- Rs.500/-<br />

3 Pulverization <strong>of</strong> Soil 10 MD Rs.100/- Rs.1000/-<br />

4 Mixing <strong>of</strong> organic manure & soil 5 MD Rs.100/ Rs.500/-<br />

5 Furrowing 5 MD Rs.100/ Rs.500/-<br />

6 Cutting <strong>of</strong> seed rhizomes & sowing 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/-<br />

7 Intercultural Operation 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(I) First weeding & earthing up (May-June) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(II) Second weeding & earthing up (July-Aug.) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

(II) Third weeding & earthing up (Oct-Nov.) 10 MD Rs.100/ Rs.1000/<br />

SUB – TOTAL Rs.7,500/-<br />

Total Rs. 75600/-<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> turmeric the harvest from the 1st year can be planted insitu in the 2nd year thus minimising the cost <strong>of</strong> cultivation and increasing<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>it in 2nd year onwards.<br />

Strategy for Implementation:<br />

The Schemes will be fully implemented in a phased manner in a span <strong>of</strong> three years. The implementation will be done in such a way that a<br />

selected beneficiary will be given the full benefit at a time so that the chosen unit has a good chance <strong>of</strong> being financially feasible and will<br />

earn income for the beneficiary to purchase the necessary food grains.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 132


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Production System – 7: Floriculture<br />

Floriculture industry a lucrative business comprising traditional flowers , cut flowers, pot plants, dry floral crafts and planting materials,<br />

besides value added products like bouquets, garlands, floral baskets, floral concretes, pot-pour and oils. It has proved to be a highly<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable agro-business generating maximum returns per unit area. Flowers like Rose, Marigold can be pr<strong>of</strong>itably cultivated. Rose and<br />

marigold fetch very high prices in the local market. This can be a good alternative and economic crop for the small stakeholders. The<br />

package <strong>of</strong> practices for commercial cultivation <strong>of</strong> these crops has been standardized and technology has been transferred.<br />

a) Marigold<br />

Marigold gained popularity amongst farmer and flower dealers on account <strong>of</strong> its easy culture, wide adaptability, attractive colour, shape,<br />

size and good keeping quality. Marigold is valued loose flower for making garlands. Besides, it is used as trap crop in the borders to attract<br />

insects attacking the main crop. Three weeks old seedlings are planted which grows upto a height <strong>of</strong> 75-90 cm at maturity with deep orange<br />

or lemon yellow flowers. It is propagated through seeds and cuttings. For better growth and improvement, application <strong>of</strong> NPK<br />

@80:40:80kg/ha is recommended. Flowers are plucked when they have attained the full size and it should be done in cool hours <strong>of</strong> the day<br />

either in the evening or morning. Good varieties <strong>of</strong> marigold are Namdhari marigold, First Lady and Pusa Narangi. Pinching <strong>of</strong> terminal<br />

leaves was found to significantly increase growth and yield in Pusa Basanti and Pusa Narangi gaindha. Pusa Narangi is mostly preferred<br />

due to higher flower production.<br />

Sowing time<br />

Transplanting<br />

time<br />

Flowering time<br />

Harvesting time<br />

Mid June Mid July Late rain<br />

Mid Sept. Mid October Winter<br />

Jan- Feb. Feb.- March Summer<br />

Input required<br />

Picked once in 3<br />

days; 60 days<br />

after planting<br />

Good quality seedlings, nursery to raise seedlings, manpower, manures and fertilizers.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 133


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.vii: Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Marigold cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />

1 Land Preparation 7500 -<br />

2 Seedlings (40000 nos) 20000 -<br />

3 Sowing/watering etc 15000 -<br />

4 Farm Yard Manure 15000 -<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 3125<br />

6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />

7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 15000 -<br />

8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers 7600<br />

9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />

Total Expenditure: 84625<br />

10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate/Kg Income (Rs)<br />

11 2500 50 125000<br />

12 Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it 40375<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 134


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Activity Flow Chart - Marigold<br />

Climate (20-32 0 C)<br />

Sandy Loam<br />

Propagation<br />

Seed<br />

Stem Cutting<br />

Raising seedlings in open field<br />

Transplanting (1 month old)<br />

Spacing (50Cm × 50Cm)<br />

N:P:K (80:40:80kg/ha) + FYM 15<br />

tonnes/ha<br />

Irrigation (once in 4-5 days during dry period)<br />

Weeding<br />

Pinching after 40 days <strong>of</strong> transplanting<br />

Harvesting<br />

For Local market packed in cloth, poly<br />

bags and basket<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 135


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

b) Sunflower<br />

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop in India popularly known as “Surajmukhi.” It is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing<br />

oilseed crops in India. Sunflower being a short duration and day neutral plant is quite suitable to fit in our existing cropping system.<br />

Sunflower is a major source <strong>of</strong> vegetable oil in the world. It is used for a variety <strong>of</strong> cooking purposes. Sunflower seed contains about 48 –<br />

53 percent edible oil. It is used as nutritious meal for birds and animals. Sunflower has one <strong>of</strong> the shortest growing seasons <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

cash crops. Plants are drought-resistant and grow well in soils ranging in texture from sand to clay. Soils should have good drainage for<br />

sunflower production.<br />

Like most field crops, sunflower requires the kind <strong>of</strong> good seed-bed which results from carrying out a second ploughing if the field is<br />

planted on a fallow/barren land. By ploughing, only once on already cultivatable land, however, a farmer can reduce his variable costs <strong>of</strong><br />

production. By and large farmers have now adopted improved methods <strong>of</strong> planting. The crop was initially broadcast done before sunflower<br />

gained popularity from various institutions. Line planting, however, is now dominant with recommended spacing <strong>of</strong> 75cm by 50cm and 2<br />

seeds per hole. An application <strong>of</strong> P 2 0 5 fertilizer before planting and 60kg/ha <strong>of</strong> Nitrogen at thinning are recommended. Lower plant<br />

populations are recommended in areas where rainfall is limited (on average 33,000-45,000 plants per ha in semi-arid areas). However, the<br />

highest yields and oil percentages are obtained by planting early. Seed can be planted to a maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 10cm if necessary to reach<br />

moisture.<br />

Sunflower harvesting<br />

Sunflower harvesting, by hand or machine, takes place when the upper leaves have started to dry and the flowers are faded.<br />

In some cases, especially when the fields are small, it is preferable to harvest the crop before maturity. This decreases the risk <strong>of</strong> losses<br />

from attacks by birds and other pests.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 136


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Hand harvesting<br />

Manual harvesting is done by cutting <strong>of</strong>f heads with a knife or clippers.<br />

If, at harvest time, the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the seeds is higher than 15 percent, the heads should be pre-dried before threshing.<br />

Mechanized harvest<br />

Mechanized harvesting <strong>of</strong> sunflowers is generally done with combine harvesters designed for wheat, but modified and equipped with a<br />

sunflower-picker head.<br />

The work capacity <strong>of</strong> these machines is about 0.9 h/ha.<br />

Seed Type<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the hybrids<br />

KBSH-1, Jwalamukhi, Sungene-85, PAC-36, PAC-<br />

1091, MLSFH-47<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the varieties<br />

GAUSUF-15, Morden TNAUSUF-7<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 137


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table No-42.viii Technical Details <strong>of</strong> Sunflower Plantation Activities<br />

Particulars Value<br />

Crop Name Sunflower<br />

Plant To Plant Spacing 0.50 mt<br />

Row to Row Spacing 0.75 mt<br />

Seed Required 32 Kg Kg<br />

No. or rows 133 No.<br />

Cultivation Area(100 X 100) Mt 10000 Sq. Mt<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants 3000 Nos.<br />

Plantation Area 1.00 Ha.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Plants for 1.00 ha 30000 Nos.<br />

Gap Filling 20 %<br />

S. No. Description No. Lengt Width Depth Unit Quantity Rate Amount<br />

h(m.) (m.) (m.)<br />

1 Cultivation cost before sowing 100 100 Ha 10000 4850<br />

2 Providing sunflower seeds(Incl. transportation, loading and 32 Kg 32 225 7200<br />

unloading<br />

3 Sowing <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds 3200<br />

4 Irrigation and other miscalleneous cost 35000<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers and fugicides, watering, weeding cost and other<br />

25000<br />

treatment etc complete<br />

6 Threshing and collection <strong>of</strong> sunflowers 4500<br />

7 Contigency . 6500<br />

Total 86250<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 138


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Cost Benefit ratio <strong>of</strong> sunflower plantation<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> 1 Hactare plantation : Rs.86250<br />

Total benefit obtained from the sunflower plantation :<br />

Total Yield from 1 hactare : 980 Kg<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> sunflower seeds in the market : Rs. 117 per Kg<br />

So, total amount obtained from the sunflower plantation is Rs. 115250<br />

So, Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it will be Rs. 115250-86250 = Rs.29000 per Hactare<br />

c) Rose Plantation<br />

Commercial Farming <strong>of</strong> Rose in <strong>Gujarat</strong>: The main districts which are having commercial farming <strong>of</strong> rose are Ahmedabad, Baroda,<br />

Anand, Surat, Navsari and Valsad. Nowadays Saurashtra farmers have also been motivated for rose farming through watershed activities.<br />

Varieties <strong>of</strong> Rose : There are approx. 2000 varieties <strong>of</strong> roses are available. Some <strong>of</strong> them are as under.<br />

1) Miniature (Vaman) Rose : Plants are short, Leaves are small, Planted in buckets(kundas) or around the garden.<br />

Varities in this types are Baby gold star, Pipilov, Scarlet Jem, Nartaki<br />

2) Floribanda : big size flowers, flowers are in bunch.<br />

Varieties :<br />

White : Iceburg, Summer s now, Hemangini<br />

Pink : Queen Elisabeth, Junius miss, Delhi prince, Bon bon, Narmada, Rupal<br />

Orange :Anabel , Flemeko, Zenina, Sunfire, Dipak, Dipika<br />

Red : Europeana, Marlena, Zizi, Devdaji, Jantar-mantar<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 139


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Yellow : Circus, Golden Rain, Mahadev<br />

Lovender : Mahuva, Milambari, Sushma<br />

3) Hybrid-Tee : Most adoptable variety in India, big and attractive flowers.<br />

White : Virgo, Paskali, White masterpiece, Tushar, John <strong>of</strong> Kienedy, Vite van, Garden party<br />

Pink : Confidence, Marita Flash, Michel Miland, Pitar Fenkrenfold, First Prize<br />

Yellow : Garga, Golden giant, Landora, Mubela, Bikaner<br />

Orange : Arizona, Kolit flame, Just Joy, Super Star, Montezuma<br />

Red : Papa Miland, Red master piece, krimson Glory, Red devil, S<strong>of</strong>ia loren, happiness Gladiator<br />

4) Mixd Colour : Criss <strong>of</strong> fire, careless love, Granda,American hemirtes<br />

Poly entha : short plants, long time seed germination<br />

Velia Gulab : like Velas, Varieties : Casino, Koktel delhi white, purl, lemark tempo, Royal gold<br />

Climate: Cold and dry atmosphere is best suited for rose planting. Rose can be planted in hot and moist enviroment also but requires more<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

Soil: Soil with good drain, fertile and medium black soil is suited to rose planting. It can be sown in sandy soil also, but required more<br />

compost manure.<br />

Sometimes due to poor drain capacity <strong>of</strong> black soil, water logging damages rose plants. By improving soil drain capacity, rose<br />

plants can be sown in heavy black soil also. Rose plants require more sunlight. so it should be sown in place which is open to sunlight.<br />

Sowing: Digging pits <strong>of</strong> size 60x60x60 cm in size and it should be open to sunlight upto 10 to 15 days. In the dig soil 6 to 8 kg cow dung<br />

manure should be mixed. Moreover, 50gm Urea, 100 Gram super phosphate and 50 gram Murate <strong>of</strong> potash should be mixed. If fungi is<br />

there, 3 to 5 gm BHC should also be mixed.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 140


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> sowing: Roses can be sown throughout the year. But it should not be sown in heavy rainfall season like July-August and also not<br />

in April-May.<br />

Table No-42.ix: Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

Economic <strong>of</strong> Rose cultivation in 1 Hectare<br />

S.No Particulars Expenditure (Rs.) Income<br />

1 Land Preparation 7500<br />

2 Seedlings (5000 nos), Rs. 6 per plant 30000 -<br />

3 Sowing/watering etc 12500 -<br />

4 Farm Yard Manure 12000 -<br />

5 Application <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser cost 2800<br />

6 Ploughing 7000 -<br />

7 Labour cost for weeding/soil bed 18000 -<br />

8 Plucking <strong>of</strong> flowers(Considering 58 Mandays) 8900<br />

9 Miscellaneous 2000<br />

Total Expenditure: 100700<br />

10 Production (Kg/Ha) Rate Income<br />

11 1250 120 150000<br />

Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it : 49300<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 141


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.43: Details <strong>of</strong> activities in the CPRs in the project areas<br />

S. No.<br />

Name(s) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

villages<br />

CPR particulars Activity proposed Target area under the<br />

activity (ha)<br />

Target<br />

Estimated expenditure<br />

(Rs.)<br />

Expected no. <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries<br />

Kharachiya<br />

(Jam)<br />

Panchavda<br />

Jangavad<br />

Jasapar<br />

Waste land Fodder/Phoenix 8.5 1.90 45<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Plantation 0.25 0.12 15<br />

Waste land Jatropha 1 0.34 12<br />

Waste land<br />

Lemon/Guava<br />

Plantaion<br />

1 1.05 18<br />

Total for Village 10.75 3.41 90<br />

Waste land<br />

Grassland/Gauchar<br />

development<br />

2 0.60 35<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder 5 1.91 42<br />

Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 15<br />

Community Lemon plot 1 1.35 18<br />

Total for Village 10 4.51 110<br />

Waste land Afforestation 0.5 0.55 22<br />

Waste land Fodder/Phoenix 7.6 1.35 28<br />

Waste land Jatropha 2 0.65 12<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 35<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Lemon Plot 1 1.35 15<br />

Total for Village 16.5 5.42 112<br />

Community<br />

Pasture land<br />

Fodder Plot 5.4 1.52 48<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Lemon plot 1 1.35 20<br />

Waste land Jatropha 4 1.3 15<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 142


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Waste<br />

land/Pasture<br />

Fodder/Phoenix 6.8 1.35 35<br />

Cultivable waste<br />

land<br />

Afforestation 0.5 0.55 16<br />

Total for Village 17.7 6.07 134<br />

Total for<br />

project<br />

54.95 19.41 446<br />

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration<br />

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> farmers’ organizations as well as extension<br />

and research institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better information flows<br />

and encourages mutual learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample opportunities for<br />

members to share complementary expertise. A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to produce, traders<br />

and consumers information, and education institutions to test their joint efforts to make a difference. Watersheds can be also a good ground<br />

for learning and demonstration <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />

Scope <strong>of</strong> capacity building at Project Villages<br />

• Income Generation Activities<br />

o Stiching<br />

o Food Processing<br />

o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management<br />

• Crop Information<br />

• Meteorological Information<br />

• Alternative Land Use Plan<br />

• Improved and Scientific agriculture practices<br />

• Scientific planning <strong>of</strong> Soil and Moisture conservation<br />

• Information dissemination on Audio/Video<br />

• Dairy <strong>Development</strong> and Management<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 143


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building<br />

S.No Organisation Training Modules<br />

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Targharia and Kutch Rajkot Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices<br />

2 Farmers training center, Rajkot Better agriculture practices and Organic farming to UGs.<br />

3 Junagarh Agril. University, Junagarh Training in modern and better agriculture practices<br />

4 Sadguru Foundation, Dahod Community Mobilization, Geology and Engg structures<br />

details<br />

5 BAIF, ANARDE foundation , Rajkot SMC works, Livelihood activities and Animal Husbandry<br />

development Programmes, SHG and federation level<br />

training and accounting<br />

6 Udyog Bharti, Gondal, Rajkot Microenterprise development activities<br />

7 District industrial center, Rajkot Mechanical training and support training to stakeholders<br />

8 Forest research center, Rajkot Afforestation and Vermicomposting and agro forestry<br />

9 SPIPA, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in<br />

watershed<br />

10 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation<br />

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point viewpoint <strong>of</strong><br />

“leveling the playing field” in anticipation <strong>of</strong> disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports Integrated Water<br />

resources Management, facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> sustainable natural resource<br />

development challenges and opportunities.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 144


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan<br />

S. No. Village Project Stakeholders<br />

Total no. <strong>of</strong> No. <strong>of</strong> persons to be No. <strong>of</strong> training<br />

persons<br />

trained<br />

programmes<br />

Estimated cost<br />

PIA 5 5 4 35000<br />

WDTs 3 3 4 20500<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

UGs 678 272 10 408000<br />

SHGs 1220 244 5 183000<br />

WCs 44 44 10 36000<br />

GPs 20 10 1 3000<br />

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities<br />

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)<br />

1 Street plays Local drama group 1.526<br />

2 Video shows DWDU, Rajkot 1.526<br />

3<br />

Wall paintings/ Focussed DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Group discussion<br />

1.526<br />

4 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Rajkot 1.908<br />

5 Banners and hoardings DWDU, Rajkot 1.145<br />

Total: 7.63<br />

Outcome<br />

Awareness generation and<br />

making beneficiaries<br />

accountable for sustainable<br />

development<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 145


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 5<br />

BUDGETING<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 146


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Budgeting<br />

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance<br />

Budget Component % <strong>of</strong> the Budget Rs in Lacs<br />

Net Project Cost 100 635.90<br />

-Administrative Costs 10 63.59<br />

-Monitoring 1 6.36<br />

-Evaluation 1 6.36<br />

Preparatory phase: 0<br />

-Entry point activities 4 25.44<br />

-Institution and capacity building 5 31.80<br />

-Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1 6.36<br />

Watershed Works Phase:<br />

-Watershed <strong>Development</strong> works, 50 317.95<br />

-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 10 63.59<br />

-Production system and micro enterprises 13 82.67<br />

Consolidation Phase 5 31.80<br />

Total 100 635.90<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 147


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under <strong>IWMP</strong><br />

Sl<br />

no<br />

Village<br />

EPA<br />

Institution<br />

and CB<br />

DPR<br />

Watershed<br />

development<br />

Work<br />

Activity<br />

Livelihood<br />

for asset less<br />

Production<br />

system and<br />

Microenterprises<br />

Consolidation<br />

1 Kharachiya 3.218 4.023 0.804 40.23 8.046 10.459 4.023 80.46<br />

Jam<br />

2 Panchvada 6.540 8.175 1.635 81.755 16.351 21.256 8.175 163.515<br />

3 Jangvad 8.929 11.161 2.232 111.61 22.323 29.019 11.161 223.23<br />

4 Jasapar 6.747 8.434 1.686 84.345 16.869 21.929 8.434 168.69<br />

5 Total 25.434 31.793 6.357 317.94 63.589 82.663 31.793 635.90<br />

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement<br />

Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available<br />

under <strong>IWMP</strong><br />

Gap in funds<br />

requirement<br />

1 Kharchiya Jam 94.90 80.46 14.44<br />

2 Panchavda 168.67 163.52 5.15<br />

3 Jangavad 233.71 223.23 10.48<br />

4 Jasapar 188.88 168.69 20.19<br />

5 Total 686.16 635.9 50.26<br />

Total<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 148


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Table no.50: Details <strong>of</strong> Convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWMP</strong> with other Schemes<br />

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out<br />

1 Kharchiya Jam<br />

2 Panchavda<br />

3 Jangavad<br />

4 Jasapar<br />

Fund made available<br />

to <strong>IWMP</strong> due to<br />

convergence (Rs. in<br />

lakh)<br />

Reference no. <strong>of</strong> activity/<br />

task/ structure in DPR<br />

Level at which<br />

decision for<br />

convergence<br />

was taken<br />

Horticultural plantation 0.12 Forest Department Dist level<br />

Farm bunding 0.83 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Community Bio gas 8.74 GEDA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 4.75 Udyog bharti/SGSY PIA level<br />

Total 14.44<br />

Desilting <strong>of</strong> Check dam 0.25 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 4.75 Udyog bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Farm bunding 0.15 MGREGA<br />

Total 5.15<br />

Afforestation 0.55 Forest department Dist level<br />

Pond deepening 0.20 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Farm bunding 0.23 MGREGA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 9.5 Udyog bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Total 10.48<br />

Afforestation 0.55 Forest department Dist level<br />

Afforestation 1.40 Forest department Dist level<br />

Community Bio gas 8.74 GEDA Dist level<br />

Charkha Udyog/Handicraft 9.5 Udyog Bharti/DIC PIA level<br />

Total 20.19<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 149


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 6<br />

EXPECTED OUTCOMES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 150


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1 Expected Outcomes<br />

6.1.1 Employment<br />

This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions <strong>of</strong> the abuttant user communities. Employment opportunities<br />

will be created to the people living in the watershed through different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self<br />

employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form <strong>of</strong> direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal<br />

husbandry and micro-enterprise development.<br />

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area<br />

s. Names <strong>of</strong> Wage employment Employment Self employment<br />

NO.<br />

Villages No. <strong>of</strong> mandays No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries No. <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />

SC ST Others Wome Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total<br />

1 Kharachiya 375 28125 17265 34905 90 0 375 230 465 19 0 75 47 94<br />

(Jam)<br />

2 Panchavda 8124 0 19500 13812 27624 108 0 260 184 368 22 0 52 37 74<br />

3 Jangavad 10677 0 4125 7401 15402 142 0 63 99 205 28 0 14 21 42<br />

4 Jasapar 8253 0 35700 21526 43953 104 0 482 287 586 25 0 96 60 121<br />

5 Total 27429 87450 60004 121884 444 0 1180 800 1624 94 0 237 165 331<br />

6.1.2 Migration<br />

WSD can open up new opportunities for households to both intensify and extensify production, for example through:<br />

• Increasing the frequency <strong>of</strong> cultivation – new water harvesting structures <strong>of</strong>ten permits cultivation <strong>of</strong> a second crop, or ‘life-saving’<br />

irrigation <strong>of</strong> a main crop.<br />

• Adopting new technologies, such as improved varieties <strong>of</strong> staple crops, higher levels <strong>of</strong> input use and higher yields; shifts to the<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> higher value crops in the project areas expected.<br />

• Expansion <strong>of</strong> cultivated areas – soil and water conservation interventions can bring new land into production.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 151


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the above tend to generate increased demands for labour. These may be provided initially from farm family sources and<br />

subsequently by hired labour. Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration<br />

from the area.<br />

Table no. 53: Details <strong>of</strong> seasonal migration from Project area<br />

SI. No. Names <strong>of</strong> villages No. <strong>of</strong> persons migrating No. <strong>of</strong> days per year <strong>of</strong> migration<br />

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post<br />

1 Kharachiya (Jam) 128 102 > 90-120 60<br />

2. Panchavda 162 130 > 90-120 60<br />

3 Jangavad 214 171 > 90-120 60<br />

4 Jasapar 156 125 > 90-120 60<br />

6.1.3 Ground water table<br />

As demand for groundwater has gone up, rapid urbanization and land use changes have decreased drastically the already low infiltration rates <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfall into the soil and have diminished the natural recharging <strong>of</strong> aquifers. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years.<br />

Substantial opportunities exist for groundwater recharge and water harvesting to supplement water supplies in the Kharachiya, Panchvada,<br />

Jangvad and Jasapar village. In order to improve the ground water situation it is necessary to artificially recharge the depleted ground water<br />

aquifers. The available techniques are easy, cost-effective and sustainable in the long term. Many <strong>of</strong> these can be adopted by the<br />

individuals and village communities with locally available materials and manpower. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks<br />

will be constructed to increase ground water table from 10-12 mt to 6-8 mt in the post project period.<br />

Table no. 54: Details <strong>of</strong> average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)<br />

S.No. Names <strong>of</strong> Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/ decrease (Post-<br />

Project)<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam, Open wells 10-12 mt. 6-8 mt<br />

Panchavda, Jangavad and<br />

Jasapar<br />

Borewells 80-100 mt 50-70 mt<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 152


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.4: Drinking water<br />

The two villages in the project area totally depend upon Narmada water supply for drinking and other domestic activities as the groundwater<br />

table is deep. WASMO/Sector Reform has constructed tanks to store water in all the villages. As a result <strong>of</strong> the watershed activities, it is expected<br />

that the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water would improve and will be available to villagers from well constructed downstream <strong>of</strong> checkdams.<br />

Table no. 55: Status <strong>of</strong> Drinking water<br />

Sl. No.<br />

Names <strong>of</strong><br />

Villages<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> drinking water (no. <strong>of</strong> months in a year)<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> drinking water<br />

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project<br />

Comments<br />

1 Kharachiya jam Narmada Pipe line Water available from Well,<br />

Check dams, PT and Narmda<br />

2 Panchvada Narmada and Panchayat Water available from Well,<br />

Well<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

and then Narmda Pipe line<br />

3 Jangavad Narmada and Panchayat Water available from Well,<br />

Well<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

4 Jasapar Narmada and Panchayat<br />

Well<br />

Water available from Well,<br />

Check dams, PT, Bore Well<br />

Slightly saline Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

Low Potable Potable<br />

6.1. 5: Crops<br />

Due to additional availability <strong>of</strong> water in new structures, farmers will be able to grow vegetable crops during non rainy seasons. Even<br />

after taking rainy season and post rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also.<br />

Mostly farmers with large families will prefer to grow vegetables, as the crops need timely availability <strong>of</strong> human labor to harvest and<br />

encash the market potential. The planned earthen bunds and salinity reducing trenches would partially prevent the saline water from the<br />

sea to mix with the sweet rain water and also help to percolate water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. Also the<br />

proposed soil and water conservation activities will bring more areas under cultivation. New agricultural practices, new technology,<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 153


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

organic farming etc will be demonstrated in the villages. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing<br />

productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season <strong>of</strong> crops. Different varieties <strong>of</strong> crops can be taken.<br />

Table no. 56: Details <strong>of</strong> crop area and yield in the project areas<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> village<br />

Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad, Jasapar<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> crops<br />

Pre-project<br />

Expected Post-project<br />

Khariff Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha<br />

(Qtl)<br />

Cotton 3064.4 14.17 3090.42 15.87<br />

Groundnut 2052.94 11.89 2190.90 12.96<br />

Fodder 107.2 9.30 109.056 12.09<br />

Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad &<br />

Jasapar<br />

Rabi<br />

Wheat 144.55 20.98 230.32 24.80<br />

Jiru 65.89 12.13 65.10 12.96<br />

Gram 12.8 13.60 12.25 14.32<br />

Project total 5447.78 5698.06<br />

6.1.6 Horticulture<br />

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under horticulture (Ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be<br />

covered through <strong>IWMP</strong>(Ha)<br />

1 Kharachiya jam 1.21 4.32<br />

2 Panchvada 3.24 6.85<br />

3 Jangavad 3.02 6.74<br />

4 Jasapar 1.84 5.21<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 154


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

6.1.7 Vegetative cover<br />

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area <strong>of</strong> 15.9 ha in the cluster area which consists <strong>of</strong> only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda<br />

babool) and other forest trees. Trees like Neem and Lemon are seen on few farm boundaries. It is planned that 40 ha land to be covered under new<br />

plantation in both villages.<br />

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam 11 12.42<br />

2 Panchvada 20 36.17<br />

3 Jangavad 19 39.42<br />

4 Jasapar 16 38.75<br />

6.1.8 Livestock<br />

The village has quite a good <strong>of</strong> livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep. The interventions like provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment <strong>of</strong> a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy<br />

development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield<br />

from them.<br />

Table no. 59: Details <strong>of</strong> livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, solids in kg and income in Rs.)<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> Village Type <strong>of</strong> Animal<br />

Pre-Project<br />

Expected Post-project<br />

Remarks<br />

1 Kharachiya Jam,<br />

Panchavda,<br />

Jangavad,<br />

Jasapar<br />

No Yield Income No. Yield Income<br />

Milch-animals<br />

Cow (per animal/day) 1177 2 24 1201 3.25 32<br />

Buffalo(per animal/day) 1372 2.5 37 1398 3.5 40<br />

Goat(Meat:Rs/kg) 375 5 120 512 6.25 180<br />

Sheep(Meat:Rs/kg) 459 5 90 604 7.15 125<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 155


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Linkages<br />

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the<br />

desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.<br />

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages<br />

S. No. Project Type <strong>of</strong> Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)<br />

1 <strong>IWMP</strong>-III<br />

Backward linkages<br />

Seed certification<br />

Seed supply system 1 1<br />

Fertilizer supply system 1 2<br />

Pesticide supply system<br />

l_ Credit institutions - Bank-1 Bank-2<br />

Water supply SSNL Well/Tube well Well/Tube well<br />

Extension services KVK/ Govt Org KVK/Govt Org.<br />

Nurseries - 16 21<br />

Kits/Tools/Machinery suppliers - 974 (Kitchen garden &<br />

Veterinary kits)<br />

Price Support system<br />

Labour<br />

Any other (please specify)<br />

Forward linkages<br />

Harvesting/threshing machinery<br />

Storage (including cold storage)<br />

Transport facilities<br />

Markets / Mandis Collective marketing<br />

system<br />

Collective marketing<br />

system<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 156


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Agro and other Industries Papad industries-20 unit<br />

Packaging-3 unit<br />

2<br />

Milk and other collection centres 6 3 9<br />

Labour<br />

Any other (please specify) Fodder bank-3 1<br />

Vermi-compost unit-4 3<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 157


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Logical Framework Analysis<br />

Narrative Summary Indicators Source <strong>of</strong> verification Assumptions<br />

Goal:<br />

Sustainable <strong>Development</strong> and<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> natural resources with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> Peoples Participation<br />

Increased Agricultural Production<br />

and overall development<br />

Increase in contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural income to the<br />

household income<br />

Objective 1<br />

Increase soil moisture content 1.1 Less Uncertainty in<br />

Agricultural Production<br />

1.2 Farmers take two<br />

crops in a year<br />

Output<br />

Soil moisture content will increase<br />

Activities<br />

1.1 Farm bunding<br />

1-2 Crop demonstration/rotation<br />

1-3 Organic farming/Mulching<br />

1.1 Clear growth <strong>of</strong> vegetation<br />

cover<br />

1.2 Certainty in Khariff ,Rabi crop<br />

1.1 397.37 Ha- Rs 61.25<br />

1.2 6.76 Ha Rs 8.26<br />

1.3 7.10 Ha Rs 5.79<br />

1.1 Discussion with<br />

Villagers/Farmers<br />

1.2 Soil testing<br />

1.3 Physical verification<br />

Discussion with<br />

Villagers/Farmers<br />

1.1 Physical verificatiSon<br />

1.2 Records in asset register<br />

1.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

maps at different times<br />

Repair and Maintenance and<br />

taking care <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

structures<br />

Time to time take care <strong>of</strong><br />

structures<br />

1.1 Money spent on right<br />

time<br />

1.2 Proper scientific methods<br />

used<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 158


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

1.4 Measurement Book 1-3 Workers are ready<br />

1.4 Fields are free from crops<br />

Objective 2<br />

Increase irrigation potential<br />

2.1 Increased irrigated area<br />

2.2 Increase in L3333333and value<br />

2.3 More uncultivable lands to be<br />

brought under agriculture and new<br />

2.1 Revenue records<br />

2.2 Patwari map<br />

2.3 Maps from GIS<br />

2.1 Judicious use <strong>of</strong> water<br />

2.2 Accessibility to common<br />

and forest lands increased<br />

with removal <strong>of</strong><br />

plantations<br />

encroachments and resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> conflicts.<br />

Output<br />

Increased irrigation water<br />

2.1 Increased water table in wells<br />

2.1 Physical verification<br />

2.2 Structures full to its<br />

2.2 Increase in flow period <strong>of</strong><br />

2.2 Records in asset register<br />

capacity<br />

streams<br />

2.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

2.3 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

maps at different times<br />

received<br />

2.4 Promotion <strong>of</strong> better<br />

Irrigation practices like drip<br />

irrigation<br />

Activities<br />

2.1 Nalla/Gully plug<br />

2-1 21 Nos.<br />

2.1 Physical verification<br />

2.1 Good amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall<br />

2.2 Percolation tank<br />

2.2 14 Nos<br />

2.2 Records in asset register<br />

2.1 Size according to<br />

2.3 Farm ponds<br />

2.3 57Nos<br />

2.3 Interferences from GIS<br />

catchment and storage volume<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 159


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

2.4 Repair <strong>of</strong> old Check dams<br />

2.4 26 nos<br />

maps at different times<br />

calculation<br />

2.5 Check dams<br />

2.5 95 nos<br />

2.3 No seepage from structure<br />

Objective 3<br />

To improve Soil Quality<br />

3.1 Agriculture based livelihood<br />

income generation activities<br />

3.2 Promotion <strong>of</strong> organic farming<br />

Practices<br />

3.1 Physical verification 3.1 Availability <strong>of</strong><br />

waste/mulching material<br />

Output<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> Soil improved<br />

3.1 Agriculture production will<br />

3.1 Physical verification<br />

3.1 Composting material used<br />

Increase<br />

3.2 Market Survey<br />

and refilled according to farm<br />

3.2 Plantation <strong>of</strong> fruits and forest<br />

3.3 Soil testing<br />

requirement<br />

species<br />

3.2 Use it in right time<br />

Activities<br />

3.1 Composting<br />

3.1 4 Nos.<br />

Physical verification<br />

3.1 People ready for voluntary<br />

3.2 Application <strong>of</strong> Farm yard manure<br />

3.2 2.1 lakh<br />

contribution for Biogas<br />

3.3 Use <strong>of</strong> FYM enriched with Route<br />

3.3 1.25 lakh<br />

Structure<br />

Phosphate and Bio-Fertilizers<br />

3.2 Available <strong>of</strong> cow dung at<br />

right time<br />

3.3 Proper maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

structures<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 160


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective 4<br />

To increase fodder availability<br />

4.1 Increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

4.1 Survey(Pre and<br />

4.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong><br />

households having more security <strong>of</strong><br />

Post)<br />

common property resources<br />

fodder<br />

4.2 Proper distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

4.2 Reduction in drudgery <strong>of</strong> fodder<br />

seedling and take care.<br />

collection especially women<br />

Out put<br />

Increased fodder availability<br />

4.1 Health <strong>of</strong> live stock improved<br />

4.1 Expenditure on<br />

4.1 Proper seedling<br />

4.2 Expected increase in cattle<br />

seedling from register<br />

4.2 Proper care and<br />

population<br />

4.2 List <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries<br />

maintenance<br />

4.3 promotion <strong>of</strong> dairy<br />

from the register<br />

development among communities<br />

Activities<br />

4.1 Pasture land and grassland will be<br />

4.1 Rs. 9.87 Spent on fodder<br />

4.1 WC's Reports<br />

4.1 Peoples participating<br />

developed.<br />

4.2 Verification on farmbunds<br />

4.2 Expenditure Register<br />

4.2 Proper variety Selection<br />

4.2 On farm bunds selected local<br />

4.3 Resolution in WC's<br />

4.3 Social fencing<br />

species and fodder crops<br />

4.4 Physical verification<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 161


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Objective 5<br />

5.1 People's participation/women's<br />

5.1 Women participation enhanced<br />

Project to be implemented and<br />

socio-political and economic<br />

in decision-making <strong>of</strong> GVCs.<br />

managed in a democratic and<br />

empowerment in watershed for<br />

participatory way ensuring<br />

income generation activities<br />

equity.<br />

Output<br />

5.1 Maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets and<br />

5.1 Frequent meetings<br />

5.1 Proper training provided<br />

5.1 Community Mobilised<br />

records by the villagers<br />

5.2 Training register<br />

5.2 No biasness in villages<br />

5.2 Community Trained<br />

themselves.<br />

5.3 Increased<br />

5.3 Better standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />

participation<br />

Activities<br />

5.1 Formation and strengthening <strong>of</strong><br />

5.1 Increased awareness amongst<br />

5.1 Farmable socio-cultural<br />

5.1 No influence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

village institutions like women's SHG<br />

groups/WC/UGs and WCs through<br />

awareness programmes<br />

5.2 Formation <strong>of</strong> fodder banks to<br />

increase fodder security and promote<br />

dung development<br />

5.3 Capapcity building <strong>of</strong> SHG leaders<br />

and accounts members<br />

/farmers/UGs/WCs through<br />

workshop/meetings<br />

5.4 Income generation activities.<br />

women about village resources.<br />

5.2 Women participation enhanced<br />

in decision-making <strong>of</strong> GVCs.<br />

5.3 Farmers adopt organic farming<br />

practices<br />

5.4 Increased household income<br />

5.5 Improved access to credit to<br />

livelihood purposes.<br />

5.6 Gender sensitization <strong>of</strong> UGs<br />

and WCs to increase inclusiveness<br />

conditions at the village<br />

5.2 Checking registers <strong>of</strong><br />

SHGs<br />

5.3 Checking passbook <strong>of</strong><br />

groups<br />

5.4 Physical verification <strong>of</strong><br />

income generation activities<br />

5.5 Posters/banners/meeting<br />

register<br />

external agency<br />

5.2 Smooth flow <strong>of</strong> funds<br />

5.3 Access to appropriate<br />

technology<br />

5.4 People's Participation and<br />

positive perception towards<br />

the programme<br />

5.5 Awareness campaign<br />

<strong>of</strong> group decision making.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 162


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 7<br />

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 163


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

Quality and Sustainability Issues<br />

A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.<br />

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the project. The system shows the<br />

entire state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> and all <strong>of</strong> those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular<br />

project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number<br />

wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users <strong>of</strong> the system. This system is being used<br />

for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form <strong>of</strong> a database which will<br />

help the stakeholders know areas <strong>of</strong> importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment<br />

etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries <strong>of</strong> various years from the project inception<br />

stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the treatment and thereby plan corrective<br />

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project.<br />

Yet another component <strong>of</strong> the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the<br />

ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any<br />

higher-up <strong>of</strong>ficial in charge <strong>of</strong> the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS.<br />

The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information <strong>of</strong><br />

various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any<br />

progress in the treatment area is reported to the server by means <strong>of</strong> an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal <strong>of</strong>ficer or higher-up<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial can view the progress in a project by means <strong>of</strong> summarized reports generated over frequent periods <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 164


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Vigilance and Monitoring Committees<br />

1. For every work sanctioned under the Scheme, there should be a local vigilance and monitoring committee, composed <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

locality or village where the work is undertaken, to monitor the progress and quality <strong>of</strong> work while it is in progress. The Gram Sabha will<br />

elect the members <strong>of</strong> this committee and ensure that SC/STs and women are represented on it.<br />

2. The Implementing Agency should apprise this committee <strong>of</strong> estimates regarding the work, time frame and quality parameters. The final<br />

report <strong>of</strong> the committee should be attached along with the Completion Certificate <strong>of</strong> the work, and should also be placed at the next<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the Gram Sabha in the Panchayat where work has been executed.<br />

3. Local beneficiary committees may also be constituted for effective articulation <strong>of</strong> their entitlements and their access to them. The PIA<br />

members will be responsible for ensuring that local monitoring committees/beneficiary committees are constituted.<br />

Research support in watershed management<br />

Watershed management requires the support <strong>of</strong> research. Watershed projects will be used as on-farm sites for research designed and<br />

implemented with significant involvement <strong>of</strong> farmers and extension workers to produce site-specific technological solutions. This leads to<br />

problems in adoption and up-scaling <strong>of</strong> research findings within specific watersheds. There is also the question <strong>of</strong> up-scaling technologies<br />

and approaches beyond a designated watershed. At the same time, researchers will be able to relate research activities to the real problems<br />

facing farmers or to capture the locally developed or modified technologies. Yet there is a need to give technologies appropriate technical<br />

and scientific definition and to disseminate them widely.<br />

Farmer organization and empowerment<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> natural resources requires strong and effective farmer organizations. Such organizations empower farmers and<br />

create a good foundation for the transfer, adoption and use <strong>of</strong> information on new technologies. They also help in negotiating for inputs at<br />

favorable prices.<br />

Strong farmers’ organizations can be a conduit for services that meet felt needs. These needs include information to improve<br />

production and marketing, credit, and demand driven approaches that ensure ownership and sustainability <strong>of</strong> interventions.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 165


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Farmers’ organization allows the use <strong>of</strong> participatory approaches that recognize local capacity and indigenous knowledge. It<br />

incorporates the aspirations and perceptions that influence decision-making, while giving farmers an important role in planning and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> watershed management activities. Such participation is important for the success, continuity and sustainability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resource management programmes.<br />

Often a successful watershed knits together many aspects <strong>of</strong> the people’s lives apart from purely technical issues. Many<br />

conservation and basic group production initiatives have widened into a social movement dealing with matters such as weddings, funerals,<br />

care for the elderly and the disadvantaged, and other issues in the community.<br />

The initial natural resources focus also widens into a set <strong>of</strong> integrated activities such as the improvement <strong>of</strong> houses, provision <strong>of</strong><br />

water and electricity, acquisition <strong>of</strong> improved tools, seeds and livestock, all in the name <strong>of</strong> watershed management.<br />

Empowerment <strong>of</strong> farmers therefore allows farmers to demand services and to ensure the continued role <strong>of</strong> the state in supporting<br />

watershed development.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge<br />

Experience has shown that to effectively reach the farmers and to create viable watershed management options, it is important to<br />

respect indigenous knowledge and combine it with the formal modern science and technology. Local traditional institutions should be part<br />

and parcel <strong>of</strong> the process. For instance, there is a lot <strong>of</strong> under-used indigenous knowledge about climate, soils, biodiversity and other<br />

production conditions that confront farmers. A lot <strong>of</strong> research findings are abstract to extension providers and farmers alike. Such findings<br />

need to be married with indigenous knowledge and disseminated in a language that farmers and members <strong>of</strong> traditional institutions can<br />

understand.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 166


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Plans For Project management:<br />

The Project management <strong>of</strong> any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and<br />

the village level institutes. In both Kumbhariya and Khakhrechi, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for<br />

post project operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity<br />

building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.<br />

Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund:<br />

Such contributions will promote feeling <strong>of</strong> “ownership” <strong>of</strong> the programme among stakeholders. This will contribute to sustainable<br />

outcomes in the long-term. The voluntary contributions are saved in the Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund (WDF) that is to be used for repair,<br />

maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> assets created on common land. The contribution <strong>of</strong> it will comes mainly fund the following:<br />

Table No. 60. Details <strong>of</strong> Watershed <strong>Development</strong> Fund(WDF)<br />

Sl. No Financial Details Percent Contribution<br />

1 Natural Resource Management<br />

For General 10%<br />

For SC/ST 5%<br />

2 For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry<br />

For General 40%<br />

For SC/ST 20%<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 167


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form <strong>of</strong> voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be<br />

diverted to the WDF.<br />

User Charges:<br />

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed<br />

during the formation <strong>of</strong> user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records <strong>of</strong> the following.<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 168


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

CHAPTER - 8<br />

MAPS<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 169


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 170


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 171


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 172


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 173


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 174


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 175


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 176


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 177


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 178


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 179


DWDU, Rajkot<br />

Detailed Project Report: <strong>IWMP</strong>-III 180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!