IWMP -3 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State ...

Page 1 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Detailed Project Report : IWMP -3
PIA: Territorial Forestry Division Bhavnagar
DWDU Bhavnagar

Page 2 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Contents
Table no.1: Basic Project Information ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
Table No. 2: Weightage of the Project ............................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table No. 3: Watershed Information ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Table No. 4 : Developmental Programmers Running in the Project Area ............................................................................................................................ 12
Table No. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area .................................................................................................................................... 12
Table No. 6: PIA .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16
Table No. 7: Staff at PIA Level .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Table No. 8: Land Use Pattern .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Table No. 9: Soil Type and Topography ............................................................................................................................................................................ 17
Table No. 10: Flood and Drought Condition ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Table No. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress) ................................................................................................................................................... 18
Table No. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Table No. 12: Climatic Conditions..................................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Table No. 13: Physiographic and Relief ............................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table No. 14: Land Ownership Details .............................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table No. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table No. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table No. 17: Crop Details ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Page 3 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 18: Livestock.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Table No. 19: Drinking Water .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 24
Table No. 20 A: Details of Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table No. 21 : Demographic Information .......................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Table No. 22 : Literacy Rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Table No. 23 : Migration Details ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Table No. 24 : Poverty ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Table No. 25: Village Infrastructure.................................................................................................................................................................................. 28
Table No. 26: Facilities / HH Assets .................................................................................................................................................................................. 28
Table No. 27: Income ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
Table No. 28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................................................................................ 29
Table No. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution) ............................................................................................................................................ 31
Table No. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects ........................................................................................................................... 35
Table No. 31: Watershed Committee Details ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Table No. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details - Gadhula ................................................................................................................................................... 41
Gohil Bhagirathsinh H. .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
M .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41

Page 4 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Yes ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41
B.R.S. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41
Table No. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Bhutiya .................................................................................................................................................... 43
5 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Ramaben Mavajibhai Patel............................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
May – 10 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Member .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
F ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Yes ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43

Page 5 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
B, E, I .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Table No. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Piparadi .................................................................................................................................................. 45
Table No. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Piparadi .................................................................................................................................................. 45
Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Sanosara .............................................................................................................................................................................. 46
Table No. 32 B: SHG Detail - Gadhula ................................................................................................................................................................................ 46
Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail- Bhutiya ................................................................................................................................................................................. 48
Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail - Piparadi ............................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Table No. 33 B: UG Detail - Gadhula .................................................................................................................................................................................. 49
Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Bhutiya ................................................................................................................................................................................... 50
Table No. 33 D: UG Detail- Piparadi .................................................................................................................................................................................. 50
Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA) (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.) ..................................................................................................................... 51
Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.) ................................................................................................ 52
Table No. 37: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.) .......................................... 60

Page 6 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 38: Activities Related to Livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the Project Areas .......................................................................................... 61
Table No. 40.1: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- Sanosara ............................................................................................................. 64
Table No. 40.3: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- Bhutiya ............................................................................................................... 65
Table No. 40.4: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*-Piparadi .............................................................................................................. 66
Table No. 41.1: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works – Sanosara ............................................................................... 67
Table No. 41.2: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works – Gadhula ................................................................................ 68
Table No. 41.3: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works - Bhutiya ................................................................................. 69
Table No. 41.4: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works - Piparadi ................................................................................ 70
Table No. 42.1: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Sanosara ............................................................................................................................................ 71
4.50 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72
7.00 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72
Table No. 42.2: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Gadhula .............................................................................................................................................. 73
Table No. 42.3: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Bhutiya .............................................................................................................................................. 73
Table No. 42.4: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Piparadi ............................................................................................................................................. 74
Table No. 43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas ..................................................................................................................................... 76
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ....................................................................................................................................................................... 80
Table No. 46: Information, Education and Communication Activities ................................................................................................................................. 82
Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project ................................................................................................................................................................ 83
Table No. 48: Village-wise & Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP .................................................................................................................... 84

Page 7 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes ................................................................................................................................... 85
Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 86
Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area: ...................................................................................................................................................................... 87
Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area ........................................................................................................................................... 87
Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters) ............................................................................................ 88
Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water ............................................................................................................................................................................. 88
Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas ............................................................................................................................. 89
Table No. 57 : Area under Horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................. 90
Table No. 58 : Forest/Vegetative Cover ........................................................................................................................................................................... 90
Table No. 59 : Details of Livestock in the Project Areas ...................................................................................................................................................... 91
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages ....................................................................................................................................................................... 91

Page 8 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table no.1: Basic Project Information
The project is situated in Shihor Taluka of Bhavnagar District. The project comprises four villages viz. Sanosara, Gadhula, Bhutiya &
Piparadi. Total Geographical Area of the cluster is 5358.70 Ha. & the proposed Project Area is 4858.70 Ha.. Total project cost is Rs. 583.04 Lakh.
The biggest village is Sanosara, so project cluster is identified with its name. District Watershed Development Unit, Bhavnagar is appointed as
Project Managing Authority and Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar is appointed as Project Implementing Agency for
this project.
All the Four villages are well connected with pucca road. Main communities in the villages are Patel, Koli, Khatriya, Maldhari & Harijan.
People of these villages are primarily dependent on rain-fed agriculture, agriculture based labour and animal husbandry. The cluster comprises 4
micro watersheds viz. 5G2C2c3g / 5G2C2c3q / 5G2C2c3h / 5G2C2c3n. There are streams named Sindari, Gadhuli, Lindaki, Kansari River in the
project area.
Table No. 1A: Area Proposed to be Treated
S.
No.
1
Name of
the project
Name
Villages
Census code
Gram
Panchayats
2
IWMP – 3
Gadhula 140070100140000 Gadhula
3
Sanosara
Bhutiya
Sanosara 140070100340000 Sanosara
140070100130000
Bhutiya
Taluka
Shihor
District
Area of
the
project
Area
proposed
to be
treated
Total
project
cost
2171.20 2171.20 296.54
Shihor 115.10 115.10 13.81
Bhavnagar
Shihor
1251.30 1251.30
150.16
4 Piparadi 140070100350000 Piparadi Shihor 1021.10 1021.10 122.53
PIA
Dy. Conservator
of Forest,
Bhavnagar
Division,
Bhavnagar
Total.. 4858.70 4858.70
583.04

Page 9 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Prioritization of the Project
Prioritization of micro watershed has been done by considering socio-economic as well as physical parameters. Watershed Development
Program is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual Wages, Percentage of Small and
Marginal Farmers, Ground Water Status, Moisture Index, Area under Rain-fed Agriculture, Drinking Water Situation in the Area, Percentage of
Degraded Land, Productivity Potential of the Land, Continuity of Another Watershed that has already Developed/Treated, Cluster Approach for
Plain or Hilly Terrain. Based on 13 parameters priority map has been prepared by BISAG, Gandhinagar which provides technical support for
watershed projects in Gujarat state and a composite ranking is given to Sanosara Watershed Project as given in table no. 2. Cluster approach was
followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds covering a total area of 4858.70 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 93.5
# Criteria and Weightage for Selection of Watershed
Sr.
Maximum
Criteria
No.
Score
Ranges & Scores
I Poverty index (% of poor
to population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %
(2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are
significantly lower than
minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to
or higher than minimum
wages (0)
iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
farmers
V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/
DPAP/ DDP Block
15 -66.7 & below (15)
DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)
DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/ DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed
agriculture
15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully
covered (0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %
(10)
Low- less than 10 % of
TGA (5)
X Productivity potential of 15 Lands with low production & Lands with moderate Lands with high

Page 10 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
xi
xii
xiii
the land
Contiguity to another
watershed that has already
been developed/ treated
Cluster approach in the
plains (more than one
contiguous microwatersheds
in the project)
Cluster approach in the
hills (more than one
contiguous microwatersheds
in the project)
where productivity can be
significantly enhanced with
reasonable efforts (15)
10 Contiguous to previously
treated watershed &
contiguity within the micro
watersheds in the project
(10)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds
in cluster (15)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds
in cluster (15)
production & where
productivity can be
enhanced with
reasonable efforts (10)
Contiguity within the
micro watersheds in the
project but non
contiguous to previously
treated watershed (5)
4 to 6 micro watersheds
in cluster (10)
3 to 5 micro watersheds
in cluster (10)
production & where
productivity can be
marginally enhanced
with reasonable efforts
(5)
Neither contiguous to
previously treated
watershed nor
contiguity within the
micro watersheds in the
project (0)
2 to 4 micro watersheds
in cluster (5)
2 to 3 micro watersheds
in cluster (5)
Total.. 150 150 90 41 2.5
Project
Name
IWMP –
3
Project
Type
Other
Table No. 2: Weightage of the Project
Weightage
I Ii Iii Iv V Vi Vii Viii ix X Xi xii Xiii Total
7.5 5 5 5 3 15 5 5 5 5 15 15 0 90.5

Page 11 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Project Type: Hilly/Desert/Other
Table No. 3: Watershed Information
No. Of
Name of the Watersheds
Watershed
Watershed Code
Project to be
Regime/Type/Order
Treated
IWMP 3 4 5G2C2c3g, 5G2C2c3q, 5G2C2c3h, 5G2C2c3n Other
Other Rural Development Program:
The villages have been benefited by various schemes of rural development. Currently NREGA, Indira Awas Yojana, Sardar Awas Yojana,
Swa-Jaldhara & Total Sanitation Campaign are running in the villages. This is the first watershed project in these Villages.
i. MGNREGS: Construction of bori bunds and afforestation activity has been taken-up under NREGA.
ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All remaining households will be covered under
the scheme.
iii. Awas Yojana: Houses for people under poverty line (BPL) have been constructed under Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) & Saradar Awas
Yojana(SAY)
iv. Swa-Jaldhara: Roof Water Harvesting Structures with under-ground water tank have been constructed.

Page 12 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 4 : Developmental Programmers Running in the Project Area
Estimated
Sr. Name of the
Sponsoring
Objectives of the
Year of
Villages
Number of
No. Programme/Scheme Agency
Programme/Scheme
Commencement Covered
Beneficiaries
1 Saradar Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 2001-02 3 28
2 M G N R E G A Rural Dev. Dept. Employment 2009-10 4 1631
3 Indira Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 2001-02 4 57
4 T S C Rural Dev. Dept. Sanitation 2009-10 1 13
5 Swajal dhara WASMO
Drinking Water
2008-09 3 Whole
Pre IWMP – 3 Projects in Project Area
Integrated Wasteland Development Program is in implementation phase in Piparadi village out of total 4 villages. No other villages are
benefited by Watershed Project till now. Only 500 Ha. out of total area of Piparadi village was planned to be treated.
Table No. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area
Sr.
No.
Project
Name
Name
of
Village
Year
Started
No. of
Micro
Watershed
Watershed
Codes
Area
under
Treatment
Funding
Source
Nodal
Agency
PIA
Total
Cost
Expenditure
Incurred up
to Start of
IWMP
% Financial
Completion
% Physical
Completion
1
Hariyali
11
2006
/07
Piparadi 1
5G2C
2d1b
500
GOI/
GOG
DWDU
TALUKA
PANCHA-
YAT
30.0 8.00 35% 35%

Page 13 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Project Implementing Agency
Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs
would be responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous
organizations under State/Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research Bodies, Intermediates, Panchayats, Voluntary
Organizations (VOs). The PIA of IWMP – 2 Bhimdad Watershed Project is Territorial Forest Department, Bhavnagar Division.
Territorial Forestry Department, Bhavnagar
The organization and its objectives:
Forest department is working to protect environment specially trees & jungles. As the common guide line emphasis on ridge
to valley approach & normally ridge area comes under forest. So keeping forest department as a PIA will make easy in
implementation as well as by following scientific approach. Deputy conservator of Forest will act as PIA officer. While Range Forest
Officer will be act as a project implementing officer(Project Officer/ Nodal Officer). As per guideline the PIA has recruited Watershed
Development team of Agriculture Expert, Community Mobilization Expert, civil Engineer in addition to that Computer Operator,
Surveyor and Accountant are also recruited on contract basis.
SWOT Analysis
Strength:
(1) Prior experience of watershed works.
(2) Well known from geographical condition of the cluster / Taluka.

(3) Established Infrastructure facilities.
Page 14 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 15 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Weakness:
(1) Only focus on NRM.
(2) First time working under rural development Department
(3) Has their own work load.
Opportunities:
(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and
convergence of programmes
(2) Better financial provision under IWMP
(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS
Threats:
(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact
(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning
(3) Improvement of socio-economic status of poors

Page 16 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 6: PIA
Sr. No. Names of Project Details of PIA
(i) Type of Organization Govt. Organization
(ii) Name of Organization Dy, Conservator of Forest, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar
1 IWMP - 3 (SANOSARA)
(iii)
Designation & Address
(iv) Telephone 0278-2428644
Dy, Conservator of Forest, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar,
F-9, Annexe Bldg., M.S. Building, Bhavnagar
(v) Fax 0278-2427317
(vi)
E-mail
iwmp3.bvn.dwdu@gmail.com / fo-bav@gujarat.gov.in
forestnormalbvn@yahoo.in
Table No. 7: Staff at PIA Level
Sr.
No.
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job Assigned
Monthly
Remuneration
1 Shri K.S.Randhawa, IFS 45 M DCF, Bhavnagar
M.Sc. (Maths)
LL.B.
M.Sc. (Forestry)
15 Years Total Supervision Govt. Salary
2 Shri P.B.Dave 47 M RFO, Shihor B.Sc. 21 Years Supervision Govt. Salary
3 Shri B.H.Gohil 28 M WDT Agri. B.R.S 7 Years Agri. Expert 10000
4 Shri V.P.Gohil 27 M
WDT Community
Mobiliser
B.R.S
5 Years
Community
Mobilise
10000
5 Ku. S.B.Gadhavi 24 F WDT Engineer
D. Civil,
B.A.(Eng)
2 Years Engineer 9000
6 Shri B.K.Gohel 45 M Surveyor ITI, Surveyor 2 Years Surveying 7000

Page 17 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
7 Smt. S.R.Gohil 26 F Accountant
8 Shri R.H.Nakum 26 M
Data Entry
operator
M. Com.,
PGDCA., B.Ed.
3 Years Accounting 9000
S.Y.B.A., CCC 10 Years Data Entry 7000
9 Smt. V.A. Varaiya 33 F Messenger H. S. C. 6 Years Massaging 3000
Table No. 8: Land Use Pattern
Sr. No.
Wasteland
Names of Geographical Area
Land under Rain-fed Permanent
Forest Area
Non-
Village of the Village
Agricultural use Area Pastures Cultivable
Cultivable
1 Sanosara 2471.20 0 1758.64 889.24 0 321.26 222.41
2 Gadhula 647.10 0 512.00 309.60 0 59.90 75.20
3 Bhutiya 1251.30 0 800.83 1001.00 0 162.67 112.65
4 Piparadi 1521.10 12.37 653.50 816.90 0 134.74 91.90
Name of the Agro-
Area in
Sr. No. Climatic Zone Covers
Ha.
Project Area
1 South - East Saurashtra 5390.70
Table No. 9: Soil Type and Topography
Names of the
Major Soil Types
Villages
a)Type
b) Area in Ha.
Topography
Sanosara Shallow Medium Black Soil 1758.64
Undulating and
Steep Slopes
Gadhula Shallow Medium Black Soil 512.00 Undulating and

Page 18 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope
Bhutiya Shallow Medium Black Soil 800.83
Piparadi Shallow Medium Black Soil 653.50
Moderate Slope
Undulating and
Moderate Slope
Undulating and
Moderate Slope
Table No. 10: Flood and Drought Condition
Sr. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Sanosara Once in Every 10 years Once in Three Years
2 Gadhula Once in Every 10 years Once in Three Years
3 Bhutiya Once in Every 10 years Once in Three Years
4 Piparadi Once in Every 10 years Once in Three Years
Table No. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress)
Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH
Type of Salinity
(Inherent/Ingress)
Sanosara 122p1, 154p2,186/2p5,115p10 7.52 to 8.20 Normal Inherent
Gadhula 37p1,25.1p5,67.1p2 7.57 to 7.89 Inherent
Bhutiya 36p2,79,157.158190p2 7.95 to 8.20 Normal Inherent
Piparadi 105p3.1,10,185,66p1 7.60 to 8.10 Normal Inherent

Page 19 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 11.3: Water logging Conditions
Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons
Sanosara - -
Gadhula - -
Bhutiya - -
Piparadi - -
Table No. 12: Climatic Conditions
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Rain fall
m.m.
1068
926
1070
845
442
Average Temperature (deg C)
Summer
Average Temperature (deg C)
Winter
Max Min Max Min
48.15 30.20 25.45 16.30
49.25 32.07 26.02 15.15
42.57 26.68 26.05 19.60
41.67 31.43 18.60 18.97
41.27 27.17 24.15 18.57

Page 20 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Table No. 13: Physiographic and Relief
Project name Elevation Slope Range (%) Major Streams
I.W.M.P – 3 Sanosara 21 0 to 35% Sindari , Gadhuli, Lindaki ,Kansari
Table No. 14: Land Ownership Details
Total Owned Land
Village
HHs Giving Land on Lease
HHs Taking Land on Lease
Gen OBC SC ST
1 Sanosara 500 400 05 0 0 0
2 Gadhula 289 04 06 0 0 0
3 Bhutiya 450 3 07 0 1 1
4 Piparadi 632 60 15 0 0 0
Table No. 15: Agriculture
Sr. No.
Village
Net Sown Area
One Time Two Times Three Times
1 Sanosara 1758.64 879.40 0
2 Gadhula 567.17 480.56 0
3 Bhutiya 460.00 250.00 0
4
Piparadi
1167.57 875.67 0

Page 21 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 16: Irrigation
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well
Sr.
Village Availability
Availability
Availability
Gross
No.
Net Area Gross Area
Net Area Gross Area
Net Area
Months
Months
Months
Area
1 Sanosara -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 months 879.40 879..40
2 Gadhula -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 months 480.56 480.56
3 Bhutiya -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 months 306.00 306.00
4 Piparadi -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 months 875.67 875.67

Page 22 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Village
Table No. 17: Crop Details
Kharif (Monsoon)
1 Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Ground Nut Crop 3 Millet
Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton
Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton
Area Ha.
Production
Ton
Productivity
Ton
1 Sanosara 700 1312.5 1.88 500 562.5 1.13 258 419.25 1.63
2 Gadhula 220 330 1.5 115 143.75 1.25 110 206.25 1.88
3 Bhutiya 746 1305.05 1.75 160 220 1.38 140 245 1.75
4 Piparadi 740 1202.5 1.63 160 180 1.13 80 120 1.5
Sr.
No.
Village
Rabi (Winter)
Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Barley Crop 3
Area Ha.
Production Productivity
Production Productivity
Production Productivity
Area Ha.
Area Ha.
Ton Ton
Ton Ton
Ton Ton
1 Sanosara 400 650 1.63 - - - - - -
2 Gadhula 125 171.88 1.38 - - - - - -
3 Bhutiya 106 159 1.5 100 225 2.25 - - -
4 Piparadi 165 285.75 1.75 135 337.5 2.5 - - -

Page 23 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Village
Zaid (Summer)
Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3
Area Ha.
Production Productivity
Production Productivity
Production Productivity
Area Ha.
Area Ha.
Ton Ton
Ton Ton
Ton Ton
1 Sanosara - - - - - - - - -
2 Gadhula - - - - - - - - -
3 Bhutiya - - - - - - - - -
4 Piparadi - - - - - - - - -
Table No. 18: Livestock
Total Milk
Sr.
Village Buffalo Cow (Buffalo Cow)
No.
/Year
Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others
No milk No Milk No Milk
1 Sanosara 454 1589 1364 3410 4999 759 759 80 419 0 0
2 Gadhula 271 1355 496 1488 2843 187 187 201 82 0 0
3 Bhutiya 61 488 122 732 1220 215 215 57 109 0 0
4 Piparadi 119 595 89 356 951 208 516 2000 210 0 0

Page 24 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 19: Drinking Water
Sr.
No.
Village Ground Water Table (mt) Source of Drinking Water Availability in Months Quality
1 Sanosara 25 to 35 mt. Water Tank, Well 8 to 10 High TDS
2 Gadhula 25 to 35 mt. Well, Bore well 8 High TDS
3 Bhutiya 30 to 40 mt. Well, Bore well 8 High TDS
4 Piparadi 30 to 40 mt. Well, Bore well 8 to 10 High TDS

Page 25 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Names
of
Project
CPR
Particulars
Table No. 20 A: Details of Common Property Resources
Total Area (ha)
Area Owned/ In Possession of
Govt.
Any
Panchayati
Pvt. Persons (Specify
Other (Pl.
Raj Inst.
Deptt.)
Specify)
Pvt.
Persons
Area Available for Treatment (ha)
Govt.
Any Other
Panchayati
(Specify
(Pl.
Raj Inst.
Deptt.)
Specify)
Wasteland/
Land
Degraded
- 476.48 - - - 476.48 - -
1
IWMP- 3
Sanosara
Pastures - - 621.44 - - - 621.44 -
Orchards - - 0.5 - - - 0.5 --
Village Woodlot - 16.00 - - - 16.00 - -
Forest - 12.37 - - - 12.37 - -
Village Ponds/ Tanks - - - - - - - -
Community Buildings - - - - - - - -
Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -
Permanent markets - - - - - - - -
Temples/ Places of 10 - - - - - - -
Worship
Others (Pl. Specify) - - - - - - - -

Page 26 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 21 : Demographic Information
Sr.
No.
Village Population SC ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Sanosara 9472 5456 4286 560 300 260 5.32 114 80 34 1.08
2 Gadhula 1760 875 885 130 80 50 7.39 0 0 0 0
3 Bhutiya 2534 1280 1254 172 92 80 6.79 16 10 6 0.63
4 Piparadi 2840 1423 1417 228 128 100 8.03 25 12 13 0.88
Table No. 22 : Literacy Rate
Sr. No.
Village
Literacy Literacy % Literacy %
Total % Male % Female % Above Age 14 Below Age 14
1 Sanosara 7794 91% 5016 70% 2338 54% 85% 70%
2 Gadhula 881 50% 520 59% 361 40% 50% 70%
3 Bhutiya 2134 84% 1152 90% 982 78% 90% 95%
4 Piparadi 2340 86% 1230 78% 1110 78% 85% 95%

Page 27 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 23 : Migration Details
Migration
Migration by Months
Income
Sr.
Total
Main Reason for During
Village
Up to 3 3-6 More than
No.
Population Total Male Female
Migration Migration
Months Months 6 Months
/ Month
1 Sanosara 7794 75 50 25 0 0 75 Unemployment 3000
2 Gadhula 881 180 85 95 0 180 0 Cattle 1000
3 Bhutiya 2134 40 22 18 0 0 40 Labour Work 2500
4 Piparadi 2340 145 115 30 0 65 80 Labour Work 3000
Table No. 24 : Poverty
Sr.
BPL
% of land-less
Village Total Household
% of BPL HH Total Land-less HH
No.
0-16 16-20 Total
HH
1 Sanosara 1500 51 146 197 13.13% 400 26.67
2 Gadhula 287 58 77 135 47.04% 58 14.51
3 Bhutiya 600 160 53 213 21.3% 112 11.2
4 Piparadi 710 244 53 297 41.83% 236 12.1

Page 28 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 25: Village Infrastructure
Pucca Schools
Distance
Milk
Other Co-
Road to
Post
from
Milk Co-
Sr.
Colleges
Banks
Collection
Operatives Any Other
Village the
Office
Nearest
Operative
No.
LP UP HS (Number)
(Number)
Centre
/ CBIs Institution
Village
(Distance)
Market
(Number)
(Number)
(Number)
(Y/N)
Yard
1 Sanosara Yes 4 4 2 1 1 2 22 2 2 0 1
2 Gadhula Yes 1 1 0 0 4 0 25 1 1 0 0
3 Bhutiya Yes 2 2 0 0 3 0 28 1 1 0 1
4 Piparadi Yes 2 2 1 0 1 0 30 0 0 0 0
Table No. 26: Facilities / HH Assets
HHs with HHs with Phones HHs with Vehicle
HHs with HHs with HHs
Sr.
HHs with
HHs with
Village
Safety
Cooking Drinking with
No.
Electricity
Land Line Mobile 2-Wheeler 4-Wheeler TV Set
Latrines
Gas Water Freedge
1 Sanosara 1500 1413 10 2000 800 12 1150 400 1200 1020
2 Gadhula 255 255 30 250 110 15 210 175 220 100
3 Bhutiya 600 500 15 250 250 30 600 400 600 300
4 Piparadi 2500 2300 65 1900 800 30 2000 115 2100 200

Page 29 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 27: Income
Sr. No.
Village
Agriculture Animal Husbandry Casual Labour Others
Total
(Rs. in Lacks) (Rs. in Lacks) (Rs. in Lacks) (Rs. in Lacks) (Rs. in Lacks)
1 Sanosara 28.50 11.00 19.00 10.00 68.50
2 Gadhula 7.29 0.60 0.18 0.40 8.47
3 Bhutiya 14.55 1.00 0.85 1.50 17.90
4 Piparadi 16.65 2.33 1.25 0.90 21.03
Table No. 28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sr. No. Village
Animal Benefit Type
Benefit Type 1 Woodlot Benefit Type 2
Others Total
Fodder
3
Income Rs.
% Sells Income Rs. % Sells Income Rs. % Sells Income Rs.
1 Sanosara 12 60000 15 50000 - - 110000
2 Gadhula 16 15000 10 8000 - - 23000
3 Bhutiya 18 20000 0 0 - - 20000
4 Piparadi 14 16000 0 0 - - 16000

Page 30 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 31 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution)
Animal
Sr.
Total
Agriculture + Casual
Village
Agriculture Husbandry
No.
Workforce
AH Labour
(AH)
Services Handicraft Others
1 Sanosara 5850 1900 162 0 1550 210 20 2008
2 Gadhula 883 140 15 125 291 0 7 305
3 Bhutiya 2450 110 110 110 900 115 15 160
4 Piparadi 2500 1100 100 0 965 110 25 200
Poblem Analysis
i) Rainfed Area:
The Cluster area is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation
facility, 80% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon
determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.
ii)
Traditional farming methods & Farming Methods:
This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such
as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors
contribute to low productivity.

iii)
Page 32 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Lack of adequate farm machinery:
Even today a large number of farmers in Patan use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like
seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.
iv) Blue Bull Infestation:
The Project area is facing serious problem on this issue. Due to this problem they have reduced sowing of ground nut, sesame
& other horticultural crops. Farmers are saying that their yield is being reduced up to 20% due to blue bull.
v) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher
land productivity.
vi) Lack Of Internal Linkages
As no focus on post harvest technology, the village produces are directly sold to nearest market yard. Which does not
give enough market price to the farmers. The villages do not enjoy storage, grading etc facilities.
vii) Reduced Profitability of Agriculture
Reduced profitability leads to reduce interest of young people in agriculture. This will be very harmful for future of
agriculture.
viii) Under developed Animal Husbandry
Though Gujarat is a role model in animal husbandry field, Bhavnagar district is particularly the project area is under
developed.
ix) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:
10-15% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he
sells to local traders at the low prices.

Page 33 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics.
These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high
incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed
development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1. Scientific Planning:
i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Sanosara Project consists of
four micro- watersheds namely 5G2C2c3g, 5G2C2c3q, 5G2C2c3h, 5G2C2c3n as their respective codes.
ii) Base line Survey
To access the impact of any watershed development program a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any
intervention during and post implementation of any development program. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved
household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a
detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic
profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net-consumption rate in the village,
average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits.
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area,
crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.
iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

Page 34 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the program. This
has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while
planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities
with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were
used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease
than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for
afforestation), Fodder crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers.
iv) Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for Planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil,
BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage
according to the Department of Land Records specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning
A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth,
Soil Texture, Soil Erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each
and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.
c) Hydrological Modeling
Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over
cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which
generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Page 35 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects
Sr.
Whether Scientific Criteria
Scientific Criteria/ Inputs Used
No.
was Used
(A) Planning
Cluster Approach
√
Whether Technical Back-stopping for the Project has been Arranged? If Yes, Mention the Name of
the Institute
√
Baseline Survey
√
Hydro-geological Survey
√
Contour Mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)
√
Remote Sensing Data - Especially Soil/Crop/Run-off Cover
√
Ridge to Valley Treatment
√
Online IT Connectivity Between
(1) Project and DRDA Cell/ZP √
(2) DRDA and SLNA √
(3) SLNA and DoLR √
Availability of GIS Layers
1. Cadastral Map √
2. Village Boundaries √
3. Drainage √
4. Soil (Soil Nutrient Status)
5. Land Use √

Page 36 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
6. Ground Water Status √
7. Watershed Boundaries √
8. Activity √
Crop Simulation Models #
Integrated Coupled Analyzer/ Near Infrared Visible Spectroscopy/ Medium Spectroscopy for High
Speed Soil Nutrient Analysis
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)#
√
Weather Station
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-Pesticides
2. Organic Manures √
3. Wormy-Compost √
4. Bio-Fertilizer √
5. Water Saving Devices √
6. Mechanized Tools/ Implements √
7. Bio-Fencing √
8. Nutrient Budgeting √
9. Automatic Water Level Recorders & Sediment Samplers
Any Other (Please Specify)
#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum

Page 37 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 31: Watershed Committee Details
It is a Committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This
Committee is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the Chairman of the Watershed
Committee with Secretary who will be a paid functionary.
WDT Member is also a Member of Watershed Committee. There will be a separate bank account for Watershed Project Fund. Money can
be debited by joint signatures of the Nodal Officer (PIA representative) & the President or the Secretary of Watershed Committee.
The Watershed Committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the Project Implementation Period. Details of the Committees
formed in the Project Villages are as below:
# Only the letter assigned as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A. PNP and PRA B. Planning
C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments
E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation
G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed
I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Page 38 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 39 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 31 A: Watershed Committee Details - Sanosara
Sr.
Date of
Registration
Edu.
No.
as a Designa-
M/
Land
Any Qualifi-
Function/s
Name
Society tion F SC ST SF MF LF -less UG SHG GP Other cation Assigned#
1
Dharmashibhai
Thakarshibhai May - 10 President M - - - - - - - - Yes - 8 Pass B, D, E, I
2 P.B.Dave May - 10
Nodal
Officer
M - -
- - - - - - - Yes B.Sc. A to I
3
Gohil Bhagirathsinh
H May - 10
Team
Leader
M - -
- - - - - - - Yes B.R.S. A to I
4
Devuben Maganbhai
Dabhi May – 10 Member
F - -
- - - - - Yes - -
3 Pass
B, E, I
5
Mariyamben
Mohobatbhai Saiyad May – 10 Member
F - -
- - - Yes - - - -
6 Pass
B, E, I
6 Ratabhai Nanjibhai
May – 10 Member
F Yes -
- - - - - - - -
4 Pass
B, E, I
7 Bavchandbhai
Jivrajbhai Chauhan
May – 10 Member M - - - - - - Yes - - - 6 Pass
B, E, I
8 Ajubhai Mohanbhai
Makvana
May – 10 Member M - - - - - - Yes - - - 8 Pass
B, E, I
9 Bhupatbhai Nanjibhai
Makvana
May – 10 Secretery M - - - - Yes - - - - - 8 Pass B, C, D,
G, H, I
10 Hirabhai Merabhai
Sambad
May – 10 Member M - - Yes - - - - - - - 10 Pass
B, E, I
11 Savitaben Naranbhai May – 10 Member M - - - - - - - - - - 2 Pass
B, E, I
12 Rajubhai Bhimabhai
Chauhan
May – 10 Member M - - - Yes - - - - - - 8 Pass
B, E, I
13 Dhirubhai
Parshotambhai
May – 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - Yes - 8 Pass
B, E, I

Page 40 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 41 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Names of WCs
Date of
Registration
as a
Society
Table No. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details - Gadhula
1
Gohil Mayursinh
Dashrathsinh May - 10 President
2 P.B.Dave
Nodal
May - 10 officer
3 Gohil Bhagirathsinh H.
Team
May - 10 Leader
Ramanuj Kundanben
4
Prbhudas
5 Ambaiya Hansaben
Sanjaybhai
6 Mer vasantben
Bhupatbhai
7 Parmar Savjibhai
Meghjibhai
8 Mathasuliya Jerambhai
Mavjibhai
9 Mathasuliya Ramjibhai
Bhikhabhai
M/
F
SC ST SF MF LF
M - -
Designation
Landless
UG
SH
G
GP
Any
Other
Edu.
Qualification
- - - - - - Yes 12 ST
Funct
ion/s
Assig
ned#
B, D,
E, I
M - -
- - - - - - - Yes B.Sc.
A to I
M - -
- - - - - - - Yes B.R.S.
A to I
May – 10 Member
F - -
6 Pass
- - - - - Yes -
B, E, I
May – 10 Member F - - - - - - - Yes - 7 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member F - - - - - - - - Yes 6 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - - 5 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - - 7 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M - - - - - - Yes - - 5 Pass B, E, I
10 Chudasama Vijaysinh
Bhavubha
11 Shah Chndrakantbhai
Chaturbhai
12 Parmar Manjibhai
Arjanbhai
May – 10 Secretary M - - Yes - - - - - - 6 Pass B, C,
D, G,
H, I
May – 10 Member M - - - - - Yes - - - 12 Pass B, E, I
May - 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - - - 7 Pass B, E, I

Page 42 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 43 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
1
2
Names of WCs
3 Gohil Bhagirathsinh H
4
5
Date of
Registration
as a
Society
Table No. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Bhutiya
Designation
Dhila Laxmiben
Vashrambhai May - 10 President
P.B.Dave
Nodal
May - 10 Officer
Team
May - 10 Leader
Geetaben Maheshbhai
Goswami
Ramaben Mavajibhai
Patel
May – 10
May – 10
Member
Member
6 Hiraben Makodbhai Vala May – 10 Member
M/
F
SC ST SF MF LF
Land
-less
UG
SH
G
GP
Any
othe
r
Edu.
Qualification
M - - - - - - - - Yes - 6 ST
M - - - - - - - - - Yes B.Sc.
M - -
F - -
F - -
F - -
- - - - - - - Yes B.R.S.
- - - - - Yes - -
- Yes - - - - - -
- - - - Yes
5 Pass
4 Pass
6 Pass
Functions
/
Assigned#
7 Govindbhai Khodabhai May – 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - - - 5 Pass B, E, I
Padhiyar
8 Haribhai Gigabhai Gohel May – 10 Member M - - - Yes - 7 Pass B, E, I
B, D, E, I
A to I
A to I
B, E, I
B, E, I
B, E, I
9 Lavajibhai Prshotambhai
Monpara
10 Ramjibhai Nagajibhai
Dhila
11 Ishwarbhai Laljibhai
Mendpara
12 Ravjibhai Lakhabhai
Mendpara
13 Jitubhai Meghjibhai
Makwana
14 Vasarambhai Vaghabhai
Dhila
May – 10 Member M - - - - - - Yes - - - 4 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M - - Yes 5 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M - - - - Yes - - - - - 5 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M - - - - - - Yes - - - 6 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Member M Yes - - - - - - - - - 6 Pass B, E, I
May – 10 Secretery M - - - - - - - - Yes - 7 ST B, C, D, G,
H, I

Page 44 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 45 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Piparadi
Sr.
No.
Names of WCs
Date of
Registration
as a Society
M/
F
SC ST SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
Any
Other
Designation
Landless
Educational
Qualification
Functions/
Assigned#
1 Gorasiya Babubhai Bhikhabhai May – 10 President M - - - - - - - - Yes - 10 ST B, D, E, I
2 P.B.Dave
3
Gohil Bhagirathsinh H
May – 10
May – 10
Nodal
Officer
Team
Leader
4 Sutariya Rajubhai Narshibhai May – 10 Member
5 Bhatt Balvantbhai
Hargovindbhai
May – 10
Secretary
6 Nathani Manjulaben Jethabhai May – 10 Member
7 Chohala Dumalben Bhakabhai May – 10 Member F
M - - - - - - - - - Yes B.Sc.
M - -
M - -
M -
F - -
8 Bhatt Madhuben Manishbhai May – 10 Member F - - - - - - -
9 Vaghani Vashrambhai Hirabhai May – 10 Member M - -
10 Vaghani Ashokbhai Shamjibhai May – 10 Member M - - - -
11 Rathod Ashokbhai
Parshotambhai
Yes
May – 10 Member M - - -
12 Rathod Kalabhai Karmshibhai May – 10 Member M
Yes
- - - - - - - Yes B.R.S.
A to I
A to I
- - - - Yes - - - 7 Pass B, E, I
- - - - - Yes - - 12 st.
B, C, D, G,
H, I
- - - Yes - - - - 6 Pass B, E, I
- - - - - - - - - 6 Pass B, E, I
Yes
Yes
-
-
7 Pass B, E, I
- - - - - - - 7 Pass B, E, I
Yes
Yes
- - - - - 4 Pass B, E, I
- - - - - - 5 Pass B, E, I
- - - - - - - - - 4 Pass B, E, I
13 Vaghani Ravjibhai Jasmatbhai May – 10 Member M - - - - - - - -
Yes
- 5 Pass B, E, I
14 Gohil Virubha Shivubha May – 10 Member M - - - - - -
15 Mendapara Jivrajbhai
Ranchodbhai
May – 10 Member M - - - - - -
Yes
Yes
- - - 3 Pass B, E, I
- - - 6 Pass B, E, I

SHG Formation
Page 46 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Self Help Groups are formed of weaker section of the society. Community Mobilizer will play an important role in this
activity. The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small and
marginal farmer households, landless/asset less poor agricultural laborers, women, shepherds and SC/ST persons. These Groups
shall be homogenous groups having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed area for their livelihood.
Each Self Help Group will be provided with a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by DWDU.
Sr. No.
With
only
Men
Total no. of Registered SHGs
With only
Women
With
Both
1 2 4 0 6
Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Sanosara
No. of Members
No. of SC/ST in Each
Category
No. of BPL in Each
Category
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i) Landless 11 40 51 2 4 6 2 5 7
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 13 11 24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 24 51 75 2 4 6 2 5 7
Sr. No.
With
only
Men
Total no. of Registered SHGs
With only
Women
With
Both
Table No. 32 B: SHG Detail - Gadhula
No. of Members
No. of SC/ST in Each
Category
No. of BPL in Each
Category
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 2 1 0 3 (i) Landless 22 10 32 0 2 2 0 2 2

Page 47 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
(ii) SF 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 24 10 34 0 2 2 0 2 2

Page 48 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr. No.
With
only
Men
Total no. of Registered SHGs
With only
Women
With
Both
1 2 4 0 6
Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail- Bhutiya
No. of Members
No. of SC/ST in Each
Category
No. of BPL in Each
Category
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i) Landless 22 25 47 0 12 12 12 15 27
(ii) SF 2 3 5 0 2 2 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 24 28 52 0 14 14 12 15 27
Sr. No.
With
only
Men
Total no. of Registered SHGs
With only
Women
With
Both
Total
1 3 3 0 6
Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail - Piparadi
No. of Members
No. of SC/ST in Each No. of BPL in Each
Category
Category
With With
With With
With
With
only only
Total
only only
Both
Both
Men Women
Men Women
Total
(i) Landless 10 15 25 15 30 45 11 12 23
(ii) SF 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 15 15 30 15 30 45 11 12 23

User Groups
Page 49 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in the watershed area with the help of WDT. These are
homogenous groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the
watershed areas. Each User Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or
activity. The Watershed Committee (WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups
based on the principles of equity and sustainability.
Table No. 33 A: UG Detail- Sanosara
No. of SC/ST in Each No. of BPL in Each
Total no. of UGs
No. of Members
Sr. No.
Category
Category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i)Landless 0 11 11 2 4 6 4 1 5
1 8 1 0 9
(ii) SF 50 0 50 1 0 1 0 0 0
(iii) MF 10 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 0
(iv) LF 10 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total.. 70 11 81 5 4 9 4 1 5
Table No. 33 B: UG Detail - Gadhula
No. of SC/ST in Each
Category
No. of BPL in Each
Category
Sr. No.
Total no. of UGs
No. of Members
Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total
(i)Landless 2 4 6 2 6 8 4 6 10
1 2 1 0 3
(ii) SF 8 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0
(iii) MF 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total.. 15 4 19 4 6 10 4 6 10

Page 50 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Bhutiya
No. of SC/ST in Each
Category
No. of BPL in Each
Category
Sr. No.
Total no. of UGs
No. of Members
Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 22
1 8 1 0 9
(ii) SF 40 10 50 10 11 10 0 0 0
(iii) MF 10 2 12 15 0 15 0 0 0
(iv) LF 15 0 15 10 0 10 0 0 0
Total.. 65 12 77 35 11 35 11 11 22
Table No. 33 D: UG Detail- Piparadi
No. of SC/ST in Each No. of BPL in Each
Total no. of UGs
No. of Members
Sr. No.
Category
Category
Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total Men Women Both Total
(i) Landless 5 0 5 11 0 11 11 11 22
1 6 3 0 9
(ii) SF 10 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 5 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total.. 22 13 35 11 0 11 11 11 22
Entry Point Activity:
Entry point activity is an important work for project implementation Agency (PIA) , which will help them to establish rapport with village
people and get in to the village. So entry point activity should be selected very carefully which will give benefit to all village people. Success of any
project depends on involvement of local community. Villagers are the important stake holders who will be directly benefited from the project.
Entry point activity is done during first phase of the project. It is done solve immediate problem of the village and create good impression &
feeling so the villager support the watershed project & it can be run successfully.

Sr.
No.
Names of Villages
Page 51 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Amount
Earmarked for
EPA
1 Sanosara 11.86
2
Gadhula
Table No. 34: Entry Point Activities (EPA) (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Entry Point Activities Planned
Estimated
Cost
Cause Way(2 No.) 4.11
Repairing Of Check Dam (3 Nos) 3.00
Cattle Trough 1.00
Repairing of Existing Cattle Trough &
O/H Tank
0.70
Stand Post(2 No.) 0.35
Computer Training 0.40
Travis (2 No.) 0.30
Library Books 0.30
Improved Crematoria (2 No.) 0.30
Snan Ghat at Shmashan With Tank 1.40
0.55 Pasture Development Plot
0.55
Fund Used
under
IWMP
Fund
Available by
Convergence
Convergence
Scheme
Expected
Outcome
3 Bhutiya 6.01
4 Piparadi 4.90
Repairing Of Waterworks 1.20
Cattle Trough 2.00
Travis 0.15
Library Books 0.10
Improved Crematoria (2 No.) 0.30
Cattle Camp 0.30
Stand Post 0.40
Shed for Smashan 1.36
Repairing Of Lake Outlet 1.30
Shed for Smashan 1.30
Travis 0.30
Water Purifier(2 No.) 0.30
Improved Crematoria (2 No.) 0.30

Page 52 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Cattle Camp 0.40
Afforestation 2.00
Cattle Trough 0.60
Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Identifying Report Estimated
Initiation of
Sr.
Capacity
Baseline Hydro-geological Technical Preparation Cost (Rs. in
Name of Villages Village Level
IEC Activities
No.
Building
Survey Survey Support
&
Lakh)
Institution
Agencies Stationary
1 Sanosara 0.40 0.55 0.35 0.25 0.35 0.42 0.65 2.97
2 Gadhula 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.04 1.50
3 Bhutiya 0.20 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.30 0.25 1.23
4 Piparadi 0.10 0.20 0.12 0.10 0.20 0.25 0.26 0.14
Total. 0.71 1.01 0.68 0.51 0.71 1.02 1.20 5.84
# One of the following may be entered in columns: (i) Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started
Surface Water Storage Structure
Table No. 36 A: Activities Related to Surface Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Proposed Target
Sr.
No. Village Name Type of Structures Augmentation/ Repair of Existing
Construction of New Structures
Structures
Total target

Page 53 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
No.
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Storage
Capacity
Estimated
Cost
No.
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Storage
Capacity
Estimated
Cost
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Storage
Capacity
Estimated
Cost
(i) Tank -
(ii) Pond - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake - -
(iv) Check Dam 15 350 42.00 - -
1 Sanosara
(v) Percolation Tank 1 125 400 2.50
(vi) Channel
(vii) R.R.W.H.S 150 22.50 - -
(viii) Field Outlet 15 2.25
(ix) Check dam
Desilting
(MGNAREGA)
6 1.00 - -
Total.

Page 54 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 55 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 36 B: Activities Related to Surface Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Proposed Target
Augmentation/ Repair of Existing
Construction of New Structures
Structures
Sr.
No. Village Name Type of Structures Area to
Area to
be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No.
No.
Irrigated Capacity Cost Irrigated Capacity Cost
(ha)
(ha)
(i) Tank -
1 Gadhula
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Total Target
Storage
Capacity
(ii) Pond - - -
(iii ) Lake 1 100 1600 3.21 - -
(iv) Check Dam 1 80 1530 2.34 - -
(v) Percolation
Tank
(vi) Channel
(vii) Any Others
(Please Specify)
- -
Total.. 7.55
Estimated
Cost

Page 56 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 57 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 36 C: Activities Related to Surface Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Proposed Target
Augmentation/ Repair of Existing
Construction of New Structures
Structures
Sr.
No. Village Name Type of Structures Area to
Area to
be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No.
No.
Irrigated Capacity Cost Irrigated Capacity Cost
(ha)
(ha)
(i) Tank -
1 Bhutiya
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Total Target
Storage
Capacity
(ii) Pond - - - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake 2 250 7500 6.00 - -
(iv) Check Dam 8 185 21 36.84 - -
(v) Percolation Tank
(vi) Cause Way 2 5.20
(vii) Channel - -
(viii) Check dam
Desilting
(MGNAREGA)
8 55 2.00 - -
(ix)Lake Deepening 2 160 6.00
Any Others
(Please Specify)
Total.. 55.62
Estimated
Cost

Page 58 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 59 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 36 D: Activities Related to Surface Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Proposed Target
Augmentation/ Repair of Existing
Construction of New Structures
Structures
Sr.
No. Village Name Type of Structures Area to
Area to
be Storage Estimated be Storage Estimated
No.
No.
Irrigated Capacity Cost Irrigated Capacity Cost
(ha)
(ha)
(i) Tank -
1 Piparadi
Area to
be
Irrigated
(ha)
Total Target
Storage
Capacity
(ii) Pond - - - - - - - -
(iii ) Lake 3 450 1125 9.00 - -
(iv) Check Dam 6 150 7740 15.44 - -
(v) Percolation Tank
(vi) Cause Way 4 14.30
(vii) Channel - -
(viii) Any Others
(Please Specify)
- -
Total 33.43
Estimated
Cost

Page 60 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 37: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (All Financial Figures in Lakh Rs.)
Proposed Target
Augmentation/ Repair of Construction of New Recharging
Total Target
Sr.
Existing Recharging Structures
Structures
Name of Villages Type of Structures
No.
Area to be
Area to be
Area to be
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
No. Irrigated
No. Irrigated
Irrigated
Cost
Cost
Cost
(ha)
(ha)
(ha)
1 Sanosara
(i) Open Wells -- -- --
Total for the Village
2 Gadhula
(i) Open Wells 5 0.42
Total for the Village
3 Bhutiya
(i) Open Wells 38 3.20
Total for the Village
4 Piparadi
(i) Open Wells 30 2.50
Total for the Village
Total for the (i) Open Wells 88 3.71
Project
Total for the Village

Page 61 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 38: Activities Related to Livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the Project Areas
Sr. No.
Names of
Major activities of the SHGs
Villages
Name of Activity No. of SHGs Involved Average Annual Income from Activity per SHG
Diamond Work 2 2.00
Centring Work 2 1.50
Buffalo Farming 2 2.50
1 Sanosara
Grih Udyog 1 0.50
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery 2 0.40
Mandap Decoration 2 0.70
Sewing Machine 2 0.65
Gym Khana 1 0.70
2 Gadula Centring Work 2 0.60
Bhutiya Stationary Shop 1 0.45
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery 2 0.55
4 Piparadi Stationary Shop 1 0.45
Band 2 0.50
Sewing Machine 4 0.65
Mandap Decoration
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery
1 0.55
2 0.50

Page 62 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 39.1: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target
Sr.
No.
Name of
Villages
Ridge Area
Treatment
Drainage
Line
Treatment
Nursery
Raising
Land
Development
Crop
Demonstrations
Pasture
Development
Fishery
Development
Non-
Conventional
Energy
Any
Other
(Please
Specify)
Total
Estimated
Cost (Rs. In
Lakhs)
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
1 Sanosara 310 46.00 40 37.75 2 2.00 13ha 11.55 5 20.00 100 20.00 2 3.00 141.20
6 nos 0.90
(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)
Table No. 39.2: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target
Sr.
No.
Name of
Villages
Ridge Area
Treatment
Drainage
Line
Treatment
Nursery
Raising
Land
Development
Crop
Demonstrations
Pasture
Development
Fishery
Development
Non-
Conventional
Energy
Any
Other
(Please
Specify)
Total
Estimated
Cost (Rs. In
Lakhs)
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
1 Gadhula 1 2.34 2.34
(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)

Page 63 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
No.
Name of
Villages
Ridge Area
Treatment
Drainage
Line
Treatment
Table No. 39.3: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target
Nursery
Raising
Land
Development
Crop
Demonstrations
Pasture
Development
Fishery
Development
Non-
Conventional
Energy
Any
Other
(Please
Specify)
Total
Estimated
Cost (Rs. In
Lakhs)
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
1 Bhutiya 35 12.50 9 36.92 1 1.50 13ha 11.65 2 3.00 30 6.00 1 1.50 73.07
(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)
Sr.
No.
Name of
Villages
Ridge Area
Treatment
Drainage
Line
Treatment
Table No. 39.4: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target
Nursery
Raising
Land
Development
Crop
Demonstrations
Pasture
Development
Fishery
Development
Non-
Conventional
Energy
Any
Other
(Please
Specify)
Total
Estimated
Cost (Rs. In
Lakhs)
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
1 Piparadi 75 14.50 10 25.18 1 1.50 17 1.80 2 3.00 20 4.00 1 1.50 51.48
(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)

Sanosara
Sr. Village
No. Name
1
Page 64 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 40.1: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- Sanosara
Executing
Type of Treatment Type of Land
Target
Agency
(i) (ii)
Name of Structures
(iii)
Ridge Drainage
Land Dev.
Area Line
(L)
(R) (D)
(i)
Private
(iii)
(ii) Comm Others
unity (Pl.
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
Specify) (Pl. Specify)
No. of
Units
Estimated Cost
(Rs. in Lakh)
(No./
cu.m./
rmt)
M W O T
Contour Trench R - - - C - WC 5000 Rmt 5.00
2 Bench Terracing - - - - - - - -
Expected
Month &
Year of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)
3 Graded Trench - - - - - - - -
4 Staggered Contour Bund R - - - C - WC 15000 Rmt 14.50
5 Check Wall -
6 Gully Plugs - - - - - - WC 4 5.00
7 Checks Dams - - - - - - - -
8 Loose Boulder Structure 20 8.00
9 Earthen Dam with Outlet WC 5.00
12 Stone bunds R C WC 20 nos 2.00
13 Farm Outlet - - - - - - 15 2.25
Total..
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Bhutiya
Page 65 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 40.3: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- Bhutiya
Type of Treatment Type of Land
Executing
Agency
Target
No. of Estimated Cost
Sr. Village
(ii)
(iii) (i) UG
Name of Structures (i) Ridge
(iii)
Units (Rs. in Lakh)
No. Name
Drainage
(i) (ii) Others (ii)SHG
Area
Land Dev.
(No./
Line
Private Community (Pl. (iii) Others
(R)
(L)
cu.m./ M W O T
(D)
Specify) (Pl. Specify)
rmt)
1
Cause Way Cum Check
Dam
2 5.20
2 Field Bund
3 Farm Pond
4 Checks Dams
Roof Water Harvesting
5
Structure
6 Land Levelling
Total.. 5.20
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
Expected
Month &
Year of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)

Piparadi
Page 66 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr. Village
No. Name
1
2 Field Bund
3 Land Levelling
4
5
Table No. 40.4: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*-Piparadi
Executing
Type of Treatment
Type of Land
Target
Agency
(ii) (iii)
Name of Structures (i) Ridge
Drainage Land (i)
Area
Line Dev. Private
(R)
(D) (L)
(ii)
Community
No. of
(iii) (i) UG
Units
Others (ii)SHG
(No./
(Pl. (iii) Others
cu.m./
Specify) (Pl. Specify)
rmt)
Estimated Cost
(Rs. in Lakh)
Expected
Month &
M W O T
Year of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)
Farm Pond L p 17 nos 3.40
Staggered Contour
500
R - - - C - WC
4.00
Trench
rmt
Roof Water Harvesting
Structure
6 Field Outlet
Total.. 62.2
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Page 67 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 41.1: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works – Sanosara
Village
Sr.
Name
No.
1 Sanosara
Name of
Structure/ Work
Type of
Treatment
Type of Land
(iii)
(iii) Land (i)
Dev. (L) Private
(ii)
Community
Others
(Pl.
Specify)
Executing
Target
Agency
(i) UG
Estimated
(ii)SHG Area No. of
Cost
(iii) Others (ha) Plants
(Rs. in Lakh)
(Pl. Specify)
Afforestation C WC 5 7.50
Wire Fencing C WC 12600 15.12
Pasture
25 ha.
C
WC
Development
Rmt
5.00
Gram Vatika C WC 3 3.00
(Agro Forestry) P UG 3 3.00
Crop
Demonstration
C WC 5 6.00
Total.. 51.00
Expected
Month & Year
of Completion
(mm/ yyyy)

Page 68 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 41.2: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works – Gadhula
Sr.
No.
Name of
Village
1 Gadhula
Name of Structure/
Work
Type of
Treatment
(iii) Land
Dev. (L)
(i)
Private
Type of Land
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(Pl.
Specify)
Executing
Agency
(i) UG
(ii) SHG
(iii) Others
(Pl.Specify)
Area
(ha)
No. of
Plants
Target
Estimated
Cost
(Rs. in
Lakh)
Afforestation C WC 1 ha 1.50
Horticulture
Plantation
Pasture
Development
Gram Vatika
(Agro Forestry)
Plantation
(Forest)
C WC 5 ha 1.00
C WC 1 1.00
C WC 10 ha 2.00
Total. 5.50
Expected
Month & Year
of Completion
(mm/ yyyy)

Page 69 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Sr.
Name of
No.
Village
1 Bhutiya
Table No. 41.3: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works - Bhutiya
Name of
Structure/
Work
Type of
Executing
Treatment
Type of Land
Agency
Target
(iii) Land
Dev. (L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(Pl.
Specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(Pl. Specify)
Area
(ha)
No. of
Plants
Estimated Cost
(Rs. in Lakh)
Afforestation C WC 1 1.50
Horticulture
Plantation
C WC 5 6.50
Pasture
Development
C WC 30 6.00
Gram Vatika C WC 2 2.00
Nursery
Raising
P UG 1 1.50
Plantation C UG 10 ha 2.00
Total.. 19.50
Expected
Month & Year
of Completion
(mm/ yyyy)

Page 70 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 41.4: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works - Piparadi
Type of
Treatment
Type of Land
Executing
Agency
Target
Sr.
No.
Name of
Village
Name of Structure/
Work
(iii) Land
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Others
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
Area
No. of
Estimated Cost
Expected
Month & Year
Dev. (L)
Private
Community
(Pl.
(iii) Others
(ha)
Plants
(Rs. in Lakh)
of Completion
Specify)
(Pl. Specify)
(mm/ yyyy)
1 Piparadi
Afforestation C WC 1 ha 1.50
Horticulture
Plantation
C WC 5 ha 6.50
Pasture
Development
C WC 20Ha 4.00
Gram Vatika C WC 2 nos 2.00
Nursery Raising C WC 1 ha 1.50
Agro Forestry C WC 5 5.00
Total.. 20.50

For Micro Enterprise & Production System
Page 71 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 42.1: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Sanosara
Sr.
No.
Name of village
Name of Activity
(i) Private
Type of Land
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Others
(Pl.Specify)
Executing
Target
Agency
Expected
(i) UG Estimated
Month & Year
(ii) SHG Cost
of
(iii) Others (Rs. in
Completion
(Pl. Specify) Lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Diamond work 2.00
Senting work 4.00
Vermi Compost Unit 5.00
Imitation work 2.00
Improved Animal Fodder Seeds 1.13
Agriculture processing (Grih Udyog) 1.50
Animal Husbandry 7.50
Ayurvedic Medicinal Products
Making
1.50
Nursery 3.00
Mandap decoration 2.00
Sewing Machine 1.25
Gym Khana 1.50
Thresher 1.40

Page 72 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Music Band 0.77
Labour kit 2.00
Kirana Shop 2.00
For Asset-less People - - - - -
Cattle Camp - - - UG 3.00
1 Sanosara
Revolving Fund - - - SHG 1.20
Green House - - - UG 3.50
Kitchen garden Kit - - - SHG 5.10
Solar Cooker - - - SHG 4.50
Horticultural Plants - - - UG 7.00
Chaff Cutter - - - UG 4.80
Animal Fodder - - - UG 1.00
Kitchen Garden Kit - - - UG 5.10
Wormi-Compost Unit - - - UG 5.00
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery - - - SHG 2.00
Spray Pump - - - UG 4.80
Solar Cooker - - - UG 4.50
Mandap Decoration - - - UG 2.00
Sewing Machine - - - SHG 1.25
Gym Khana - - - SHG 1.50
Thresher - - - UG 1.30
Labour Kit - - - UH 2.00
Kirana Shop - - - SHG 0.20

Page 73 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
For Micro Enterprise & Production System
Table No. 42.2: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Gadhula
Sr.
No.
Name of
village
2 Gadhula
Name of Activity
(i) Private
Type of Land
(ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(Pl.
Specify)
Executing
Agency
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others (Pl.
Specify)
Estimated
Cost
(Rs. in
Lakh)
Target
Expected
Month & Year
of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)
Horticultural plants - - - UG 0.90
Mandap Decoration 0.90
For Asset-less people - - - - - -
Kitchen Garden Kit - - - UG 1.38
For Micro Enterprise & Production System
Table No. 42.3: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Bhutiya
Sr.
No.
Name of Village
3 Bhutiya
Name of Activity
(i) Private
Type of Land
(ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(Pl.
Specify)
Executing
Agency
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others (Pl.
Specify)
Estimated
Cost
(Rs. in
Lakh)
Cattle Camp - - - UG 3.00
Revolving Fund - - - SHG 1.00
Afforestation (Horti. Plants) - - - UG 4.50
Target
Expected
Month & Year
of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)

Page 74 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Milk Centre - - - UG 4.00
Utensils for functions - - - UG 0.50
Nursery Raising - - - 1.50
Milk Processing - - - 1.50
Chaff Cutter - - - UG 2.40
Stationary Shop - - - SHG 1.20
For Asset less people - - - - - -
Kitchen Garden Kit - - - UG 4.97
Wormi-Compost Unit - - - UG 2.00
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery - - - SHG 2.00
Spray Pump - - - UG 2.40
Solar Cooker - - - UG 2.25
Labour Kit - - - UG 1.40
For Micro Enterprise & Production System
Table No. 42.4: Details of Allied / Other Activities - Piparadi
Type of Land
Executing
Agency
Target
Sr.
No.
Name of Village
Name of Activity
(i) Private
(ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(Pl.
Specify)
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others (Pl.
Specify)
Estimated
Cost
(Rs. in
Lakh)
Expected
Month & Year
of
Completion
(mm/yyyy)

Page 75 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Revolving Fund - - - SHG 1.00
Afforestation (Horti. Plants) - - - UG 4.03
Nursery Raising - - - 1.50
1 Piparadi
Bagayat Plot with Drip - - - 3.30
Stationary Shop - - - SHG 2.00
Music Band - - - SHG 2.00
Sewing Machine - - - SHG 2.30
Mandap Decoration - - - SHG 1.30
For Asset-less people - - - - - -
Kitchen Garden Kit - - - UG 4.00
Wormi-Compost Unit - - - UG 1.00
Cutlery Imitation Jewellery - - - SHG 2.00
Spray Pump - - - UG 2.40
Imroved Fodder Seeds - - - 1.20
Solar Cooker - - - UG 1.65
Note: Remaining amount will be taken as people’s contribution towards their benefit

Page 76 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas
Target
Sr. No.
Name(s) of the
Villages
CPR Particulars
Activity Proposed
Target Area under the
Activity (ha)
Estimated Expenditure
(Rs.)
Expected no. of
Beneficiaries
1 Sanosara
Waste Land
Private Land
Pasture Land
Check Dam
(20 no)
250 49.06 120
Percolation Tank 20 2.50
Existing Check
Dam Desilting
6 1.00 24
Contour Trenches 5.00
Staggered
Contour Bund
8.00
Stone Bunds 2.00
Horticulture
Plantation
10 13.00
Plantation 10 2.00
Wire Fencing 12.60 42
Field Bunds 1.36
Green House 5 1.00 5
Pasture
Development
150 30.00

Page 77 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Afforestation 2 3.00
Community Land Gram Vatika 2 2.00
Total of Village 132.52
Lake 15 2.00
Check Dam 25 3.21
Waste Land
Percolation Tank 18 2.34
Well Recharging
Structure
1 0.21
2 Gadhula
Afforestation 1 1.50
Plantation 10 2.00
Private Land Gram Vatika 1 1.00
Pasture Land
Pasture
Development
5 1.00
Total of Village 13.26
3 Bhutiya Waste Land
Check dam
(8 no)
305 36.62 120
lake 75 9.00
Existing Check
Dam Desilting
10 1.50 24
Lake Deepening 30 4.00
Horticulture 10 13.00

Page 78 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
4 Piparadi
Plantation
Plantation 10 2.00
Afforestation 1 1.50
Wire Fencing 7.50 42
Recharging
Private Land Structure
13 1.60
Gram Vatika 15 2.00
Nursery Raising 12 1.50
Pasture Land
Pasture
Development
30 6.00
Total of Village 86.22
Check Dam
(6 no)
125 15.43 40
Lake 75 9.00
Cause Way 9.00
Waste Land
Staggered
4.00
Contour Bund
Horticulture
Plantation
5 6.50
Wire Fencing 56.40 188
Private Land
Recharging
Structure
15 1.90
Field Pond 15 1.80 17

Page 79 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Pasture Land
Pasture
Development
20 4.00
Community Land
Gram Vatika 2 2.00
Nursery Raising 1 1.50
Forest Land
Afforestation 1 1.50
Agro Forestry 5 5.00
Total of Village 118.03
Total of all Villages 349.76

Page 80 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution
Capacity Building is a continuous process. As a stake holder of Watershed Program should know how to use preserved natural resources,
use of assets created under watershed program in sustainable manner, so all the stake holders including PIA, WDT, WC, SHG ,UG & village
community needs to be trained for that. Various NGOs & Government Institutes are ready to do this work. But at grass root level Krishi Vigyan
Kendra (KVK) has to deliver well as they have one of the best extension wing. KVK situated in Sanosara village of Shihor Taluka, whish is located
in the project area. SPIPA & DSC will train PIA & WDT for proper implementation of program, while BIAF & VRTI will work for animal Husbandry
& Community Mobilization.
Sr.
No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Development
Support
Centre
BISAG
Full Address with
Contact no.,
Website & E-mail
Ahmedabad
Gandhinagar
Type of
Institute#
NGO
Space
Application
VRTI – Kutch Bhavnagar NGO
BIAF Vadodara NGO
Area(s) of
Specialisation$
Capacity
Building
GIS, Remote
Sensing
Capacity
Building
Animal
Husbandry
Accreditation
Details
Society Reg.
Act
Reference Year
Trainings
No. of
Trainings
Assigned
No. of
Trainees to
be Trained
2010-2013 20 10
GoG 2010-2013 8 10
Society Reg.
Act
Society Reg.
Act
2010-2014 30 500
2010-2013 10 250
SPIPA Ahmedabad State Govt. Administration GoG 2010-2014 10 10
KVK
Sanosara –
Bhavnagar
Research
Institute
Agriculture GoI 2010-2014 30 500
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)

Page 81 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/
Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)

Page 82 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 45: Capacity Building Plan
Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders
Total no. of No. of persons to be No. of training
persons
trained
programmes
Estimated cost
DWDU Members 5 5 8 2.50
PIA 2 2 10 2.00
WDT 5 5 10 4.50
UGs 100 100 10 7.00
SHGs 55 55 20 8.00
WCs 12 12 5 5.00
GPs 7 7 1 0.88
Community 10,000 1500 10 3.00
Others
(Pl. specify)
Total.. 31.88
Table No. 46: Information, Education and Communication Activities
Sr. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)
Outcome
(may quantify, wherever possible)
Agriculture Extension KVK 2.00

Page 83 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
BUDGET
Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project
Sr. No. Budget Component Cost Requirement
1 Administrative Costs 58.30
2 Monitoring 5.84
3 Evaluation 5.84
4 Entry Point Activity 23.32
5 Institution and Capacity Building 29.16
6 Detailed Project Report 5.84
7 Watershed Development Works 291.53
8 Livelihood Activities for Asset-less 58.30
9 Production Systems and Micro-Enterprises 75.80
10 Consolidation Phase 29.16
Total.. 583.04

Page 84 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 48: Village-wise & Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP
Sr. Village
Activity
No.
EPA Institution DPR Watershed Livelihood Production Consolidation Total
and CB
Development
Work
for Assetless
System and
Microenterprises
1 Sanosara 11.86 14.83 2.97 148.27 29.65 38.55 14.83 260.96
2 Gadhula 0.55 0.69 0.14 6.91 1.38 1.80 0.69 12.16
3 Bhutiya 6.01 7.51 1.50 75.08 15.02 19.52 7.51 132.15
4 Piparadi 4.90 6.13 1.23 61.27 12.25 15.93 6.13 107.84
Total.. 23.32 29.16 5.84 291.53 58.30 75.80 29.16 513.11
Table No. 49: Village-wise Gap in Funds Requirement
Sr.
No.
Village Total Cost Requirement Total Funds Available
under IWMP
Gap in Funds
Requirement
1 Sanosara 304.8 296.54 8.26
2 Gadhula 32.71 13.81 18.9
3 Bhutiya 159.31 150.16 9.15
4 Piparadi 179.31 122.53 56.78
Total.. 676.13 583.04 93.09

Sr. No.
1
2
3
Page 85 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes
Village
Fund Made Scheme with
Reference No. of
Activity to be Available to IWMP which
Activity/ Task/
Carried Out due to Convergence Convergence Took
Structure in DPR
(Rs. in Lakh)
Place
Sanosara Check Dam
1.00 MGNAREGA Watershed work
Desilting
Phase
Well
3.00 Irrigation Deptt. Watershed work
Phase
Pasture
5.00 Forest Deptt. Watershed work
Development
Phase
Gadhula
1.00 Horticultural Dept Watershed work
Gram Vatika
Phase
Plantation
2.00 Forest Deptt. Watershed work
Phase
Bhutiya Check Dam
1.50 MGNAREGA Watershed work
Desilting
Phase
Lake Deepening
4.00 MGNAREGA Watershed work
Phase
Well Recharging
1.60 Dug Well Watershed work
Phase
Gram Vatika
2.00 Horticultural Dept Watershed work
Phase
Level at which
Decision for
Convergence
was Taken
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Page 86 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
4
Piparadi
Wire Fencing
56.40 Forest Dept. Watershed work
Phase
-
Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects
Name of
Type of Agreement Signed
Financial Contribution
Sr.
No.
Private Sector
Partner
Agency
a) MoU b) Contract
c) Any Other
(Pl. Specify)
IWMP
Private
Sector
Partnership
Interventions
Expected
Outcomes
Comments
N.A.

Page 87 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
OUTCOMES
The villages already get benefit of MGNREGA. However IWMP project has special fund allocation for asset-less people as well as microenterprise
& production system, which enable village community towards sustainable source of income i.e. self employment. The project will not
only ensure employment but also promote micro-enterprise which will create various sources of income other than agriculture & also make
agriculture more profitable. Priority will be given to weaker section of the society i.e. women, BPL & SC/ST. However no ST population resides in
the project area.
Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area:
Wage Employment
Self Employment
Sr. Names of
No. of Man Days No. of Beneficiaries No. of Beneficiaries
No. Villages
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others* Women Total
1 Sanosara 7500 - 16500 14000 38000 200 - 400 380 980 60 - 30 180 270
2 Gadhula 800 - 1000 700 2500 50 - 80 80 210 15 - 05 40 60
3 Bhutiya 6000 - 9000 7000 22000 190 - 175 185 550 25 - 12 132 169
4 Piparadi 5500 - 8500 6500 20500 120 - 130 145 395 15 - 10 120 145
* Asset-less villagers
Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area
Sr. No. Names of Villages No. of Persons Migrating No. of Days per Year of Migration
Pre-Project Expected Post Project Pre-Project Expected Post Project
1 Sanosara 75 10 180 90
2 Gadhula 180 25 150 30
3 Bhutiya 40 5 240 90

Page 88 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
4 Piparadi 145 8 180 90
Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters)
Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project Level
Expected Increase/Decrease
(Post- Project)
1 Sanosara Open Wells 35 -6 (28-30)
2 Gadhula Bore Wells 35 -6 (28-30)
3 Bhutiya Bore Wells 40 -8 (30-34)
4 Piparadi Bore Wells 40 -8 (30-34)
Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water
Availability of Drinking Water
Quality of Drinking Water
(No. of Months in a Year)
Sr. No. Names of Villages
Expected Post
Expected Post-
Pre-Project
Pre-Project
Project
Project
1 Sanosara 8-10 12 Impure Potable
2 Gadhula 8 12 Impure Potable
3 Bhutiya 8 12 Impure Potable
4 Piparadi 8-10 12 Impure Potable
Comments

Page 89 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas
Pre-Project
Expected Post-Project
Name of Village
Name of Crops
Area
(ha)
Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.
Area
(ha)
Average Yield per ha
(qtl)
Sanosara,
Gadhula, Bhutiya,
Piparadi.
Sanosara,
Gadhula, Bhutiya,
Piparadi.
Kharif
Cotton 2406 1.60 2500 1.85
Groundnut 935 1.20 1141 1.45
Millet 588 1.55 630 1.75
- - - -
Horticultural
Plants
- - 35 -
Rabi
Wheat 796 1.55 900 1.80
Village Total
Project Total

Page 90 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 57 : Area under Horticulture
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing Area under Horticulture (ha)
Area under Horticulture Proposed to be
Covered through IWMP
1 Sanosara 35 ha. 65ha
2 Gadhula 0 5ha
3 Bhutiya 0 35ha
4 Piparadi 0 30ha
Table No. 58 : Forest/Vegetative Cover
Sr. No. Name of Village Existing Area under Tree Cover (ha) Area under Tree Cover Proposed
1 Sanosara 0.00 100 ha
2 Gadhula 0.00 0
3 Bhutiya 0.00 30 ha
4 Piparadi 0.00 20 ha

Page 91 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Table No. 59 : Details of Livestock in the Project Areas
(For Fluids Please Mention in Liters, For Solids Please Mention in Kgs. and Income in Rs.)
Sr. No.
Name of
Pre-Project
Expected Post-Project
Type of Animal
Village
No. Yield Income No. Yield Income
Remarks
1 Sanosara Milching Animals 2577 5758 115160 4000 9500 237500 Considering
2 Gadhula Milching Animals 954 3093 55674 1500 3550 88750 inflation and
3 Bhutiya Milching Animals 398 1620 32400 600 3000 75000 increase in
4 Piparadi Milching Animals 416 1467 29340 1000 3200 80000 average milk
production
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages
Sr. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-Project (no.) During the Project (no.) Post-Project (no.)
Backward Linkages For Animal Husbandry - 1 2
Fodder Development - 1 1
Animal Feed Storage - 5 0
Cattle Camp - 1 1
Financial Support for Animal Husbandry - - -
Forward Linkages for Animal Husbandry - 1 2
Milk Production - 1 1
Milk Collection Centre - 1 1
Milk Processing - 1 1
Market Linkage - - -

Page 92 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Backward Linkage For Agriculture - 10 20
Wormi-Compost - 1 2
Nurseries - 3 4
Farm Machineries - - -
Water Supply - 1 -
Seed Supply - 1 2
Credit Institutions - - -
Forward Linkages For Agriculture - 2 2
Harvesting/Threshing Machinery - 2 4
Agro and Other Industries - 2 2
Market Link-up - - -

Page 93 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)
Maps

Page 94 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 95 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 96 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 97 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 98 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 99 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 100 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 101 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 102 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 103 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)

Page 104 of 104 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 3 DPR)