29.06.2014 Views

travel demand forecasting report - Sonoma County Transportation ...

travel demand forecasting report - Sonoma County Transportation ...

travel demand forecasting report - Sonoma County Transportation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix I: Travel Demand Forecasting Report<br />

In the AM peak period best paths, walk access to transit competes with auto access to transit to produce<br />

the best paths. AM peak walk-only paths and midday walk-only paths produces walk access paths to<br />

transit.<br />

2.6 Modifications to the MTC/VTA Model<br />

This section presents modifications made to the MTC/VTA <strong>travel</strong> <strong>demand</strong> model for the SMART EIR.<br />

Specific changes were made to the mode choice portion of the model to improve its ability to estimate<br />

rail <strong>travel</strong>. Each modification was made with the intent of improving the model’s ability to replicate data<br />

observed in the region of interest (the San Francisco Bay Area). Observed data/behavior was obtained<br />

from the Caltrain On-Board Survey used to calibrate the model (Caltrain, 2003).The approach first<br />

introduced a new variable to the mode choice model, and the coefficient acting on the new variable was<br />

then calibrated using observed data. The changes are discussed in two sections below: for the homebased<br />

work trip purpose and the other trip purposes.<br />

2.6.1 Home-Based Work Modifications<br />

The home-based work mode choice model includes walk-to-transit modes segmented by service<br />

type (i.e. walk to passenger rail) and generic auto access modes (i.e. drive-to-transit; where<br />

transit could be passenger rail, light rail, local bus, and so on). The modifications to the model<br />

are discussed separately for each of these access types below.<br />

Walk-access to Passenger Rail: The segmentation of transit modes in the walk access nest allowed<br />

for the introduction of passenger-rail specific coefficients. One shortcoming of the mode choice model is<br />

the lack of a penalty applied to bus-to-rail or rail-to-bus transfers. In the calibration year, this shortcoming<br />

caused an overestimation of transfer trips (a Caltrain on-board survey observed a transfer rate near 50%<br />

versus an estimated rate near 86%). To alleviate this problem, a variable to capture the number of<br />

transfers was introduced to the model and a coefficient was calibrated to allow the estimated transfer<br />

rate to more closely match the observed transfer rate. The final calibrated value for this coefficient was -<br />

3.400, which corresponds to 70 equivalent minutes of in-vehicle <strong>travel</strong> time.<br />

Drive-access to Transit: Transit modes in the drive access nest (park and ride and kiss and ride) are<br />

treated as generic. As such, variables specific to the passenger rail choice are introduced conditionally<br />

only if a passenger rail in-vehicle time is present in the input skim matrices (new drive access to<br />

passenger rail skims were produced for the SMART project and the mode choice source code was<br />

modified to accept the new skims). Three variables specific to the drive-to-passenger rail mode were<br />

introduced, namely: transfers (same as the walk access), a ratio of the drive access to passenger rail invehicle<br />

time, and an alternative specific constant.<br />

The transfer variable behaves similar to the walk-access mode, discussed previously. Again,<br />

this variable was calibrated to match the observed transfer rate. The final calibrated coefficient<br />

is -4.200, which translates to 86 equivalent in-vehicle minutes.<br />

The <strong>travel</strong> time ratio variable computes the ratio of the drive access time to the passenger rail invehicle<br />

time. Such a variable has been shown to be an important determinant of passenger rail<br />

choice in places such as San Diego. The coefficient on this variable was calibrated to<br />

approximately match the observed ratio in the San Diego Region. The final coefficient is -1.000<br />

(20 minutes of in-vehicle time).<br />

The introduction of negative utilities based on transfers and the <strong>travel</strong> time ratio causes the<br />

passenger rail portion of the drive-access to transit mode to lose market share. To regain this<br />

share, an alternative specific constant is introduced specific to the drive to passenger rail mode<br />

(again, the input skim is used to determine when this constant should be applied). The final<br />

value of this coefficient is 0.9732, which translates to 20 equivalent in-vehicle minutes.<br />

<strong>Sonoma</strong>-Marin Area Rail Transit 11 Travel Demand Forecasting Report<br />

September 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!