Perestroika and Change in Soviet Weapons ... - The Black Vault
Perestroika and Change in Soviet Weapons ... - The Black Vault
Perestroika and Change in Soviet Weapons ... - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11<br />
MILITARY INCENTIVES<br />
<strong>The</strong> highly skilled <strong>and</strong> experienced military professionals of the<br />
<strong>Soviet</strong> General Staff formulate weapon acquisition requirements <strong>and</strong><br />
policies <strong>in</strong> light of the always-chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of the technical level<br />
<strong>and</strong> capabilities of the forces oppos<strong>in</strong>g them. Real, <strong>in</strong>ternational competition<br />
generates a phenomenon that is rather rare <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Soviet</strong><br />
Union: a buyer operat<strong>in</strong>g under <strong>in</strong>centives lead<strong>in</strong>g to choices, that-to<br />
an outside observer-appear to be rational. This rationality is comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with political authority, which transforms the defense <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
sector <strong>in</strong>to a buyer's market dom<strong>in</strong>ated by consumers. Unlike most<br />
other actors <strong>in</strong> <strong>Soviet</strong> economic affairs, the military <strong>and</strong> the defense<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial managers <strong>in</strong> general actually choose what they ought to<br />
choose: <strong>The</strong>y are astute buyers. This is not to deny that distorted<br />
prices <strong>and</strong> the loosened constra<strong>in</strong>ts brought about by long-term budget<br />
growth have <strong>in</strong>duced many deviations from strictly optimal behavior,<br />
but the military has been given someth<strong>in</strong>g that others do not have:<br />
authority to cope with uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>and</strong> risk, <strong>and</strong> the ability to escape<br />
the customary <strong>Soviet</strong> preoccupation with the narrowly def<strong>in</strong>ed efficiency<br />
of producers at the expense of the utility of users.<br />
MILITARY INDUSTRY'S ACCESS TO SUPPLIES<br />
Military <strong>in</strong>dustry has customarily been given first priority <strong>in</strong> its<br />
access to materials <strong>and</strong> the outputs of other enterprises. Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with plann<strong>in</strong>g at the highest level, the military allocation (as determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>terplay of politics, economics, <strong>and</strong> military dem<strong>and</strong>s) is<br />
satisfied first, with the rest of the economy treated as a residual. 3 In<br />
production plans at enterprises, military orders must be completed<br />
before the dem<strong>and</strong>s for other customers. Capital equipment <strong>in</strong> short<br />
supply goes first to military plants, <strong>and</strong> then the rema<strong>in</strong>der is allocated<br />
to lower priority enterprises. Advanced, high productivity foreign<br />
equipment, both bought <strong>and</strong> stolen, flows to military producers. Not<br />
only supplies <strong>and</strong> equipment, but also high-quality workers <strong>and</strong><br />
managers have been channeled to the military-<strong>in</strong>dustrial sector, where<br />
they have been rewarded with high salaries, bonuses, <strong>and</strong> other perquisites<br />
such as hous<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
To guarantee the quality of its <strong>in</strong>puts, the military itself manages a<br />
network of military representatives at production plants produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
f<strong>in</strong>al goods or <strong>in</strong>puts for the military customer. <strong>The</strong>se representatives<br />
3A. S. Becker, <strong>Soviet</strong> Central Deciionmakag <strong>and</strong> Economic Growth/ A Summ<strong>in</strong> Up,<br />
R-3349-AF, <strong>The</strong> RAND Corporation, January 1986, pp. 9,19-21.