You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
Mr Chris<br />
Vertigans<br />
B9 “Planning Permission” – would it be useful to insert a URL to the Planning<br />
Portal Interactive House to help people understand what is deemed to be<br />
permitted development and what is not?<br />
B10 – “many buildings are very old” – ambiguous – what is “old”?<br />
B10 – “Cars” should be “vehicles”<br />
B10 damage from splashing through puddles – please review the credibility of<br />
the document. It appears that we are only talking about buildings that front onto<br />
the main street (within the green shaded area on the [North Duffield] village map)<br />
B11 – “rain cannot penetrate cement easily so it is found that the bricks and<br />
stone wear out faster than the mortar joints.” Consider the properties of FL<br />
quality and engineered bricks to avoid statements which could be misleading to<br />
the general public.<br />
B11 - “this accelerates wear and buildings will become damp.” Misleading: This<br />
is not the only cause of damp.<br />
B12 – whole section needs rewording so that people do not miss understand<br />
that a new uPVC gutter system is worse that a traditional timber one supported o<br />
iron brackets – for example. Or that the suggestion by adding a conservatory<br />
will seriously affect the integrity of both the appearance and the way the<br />
traditional buildings function – are we talking about uPVC or hardwood timber<br />
version?<br />
B13 - “within historic areas” we are talking about a village environment here<br />
aren’t we?<br />
B13 – “safe access” – and parking without having to mount the pavement.<br />
A link to Planning Portal would be a useful<br />
addition. make change to all VDS<br />
It is not necessary to state each building<br />
period – the issue is undertaking appropriate<br />
repairs and maintenance.<br />
Agree – make change on all VDS<br />
Disagree – this is generic advice not specific<br />
to North Duffield.<br />
The statement is not misleading. No<br />
explanation as to what FL quality is.<br />
It does not say it is the only cause of damp –<br />
just that it is a cause of damp.<br />
Again this is generic advice. The essence of<br />
the statement is that “cheap is not best”, and<br />
“sometimes modern is not suitable”. The list<br />
of examples is not exhaustive, and details are<br />
not discussed. It is guidance, and the<br />
appropriate advice is offered via English<br />
Heritage Historic Environment Local<br />
Management arm (HELM.)<br />
It Is not clear what issue is being raised.<br />
This is generic information about the conflict<br />
between historic layouts and modern highway<br />
requirements – it is not specific to North<br />
Duffield. – Parking matters considered in<br />
50
Change language