07.07.2014 Views

Residents' Evacuation Capability in Buildings

Residents' Evacuation Capability in Buildings

Residents' Evacuation Capability in Buildings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The average need for assistance per resident will decrease to 0.4 <strong>in</strong> blocks of service<br />

flats, 0.7 <strong>in</strong> old people«s homes and 0.6 <strong>in</strong> group-residential units. These figures should<br />

be compaired with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures <strong>in</strong> multi-storeyed build<strong>in</strong>gs, which are 1.2,<br />

1.3 and 1.2.<br />

15<br />

Safety level <strong>in</strong> care hous<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to the latest proposal of Swedish build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

standards, <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>in</strong> 1994.<br />

By def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the residents« evacuation capability and the need for assistance <strong>in</strong> an emergency<br />

situation we are able to establish the equivalence of the proposals for the<br />

Swedish Build<strong>in</strong>g Standards of 1994 (BBR -94).<br />

The proposed new build<strong>in</strong>g standards consists of regulations and general advice. The<br />

regulations are basic requirements of general <strong>in</strong>terest. The general advice <strong>in</strong> connection<br />

with a regulation should make the regulation clearer and give one or two alternative<br />

ways to make the requirement fulfilled. There are two types of advice; 'should' and<br />

'may'. The 'should' advice means a recommendation from the authority. Other solutions<br />

than those mentioned <strong>in</strong> the advice may be accepted. The 'may' advice is <strong>in</strong>tended as<br />

example of one way among others to fulfil the demand of the regulation.<br />

How do the new safety provisions meet the demands for safety measures <strong>in</strong> various<br />

forms of care hous<strong>in</strong>g? As an aid for this analysis Table 2 show<strong>in</strong>g the aim of safety<br />

measures is used.<br />

Fire control<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to BBR -94 means of automatic fire alarm is required <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs disposed<br />

of alternative hous<strong>in</strong>g, that is care hous<strong>in</strong>g. The advice reads; The automatic alarm<br />

should consist of smoke detectors giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dication to on-site staff. When staff is not<br />

available the alarm should be transmitted to the fire station. The demand for 24 hours<br />

staff attendence could not be claimed by the National Board of Hous<strong>in</strong>g, Build<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

As prevention of smoke and fire spread compartmentation is proposed. Like <strong>in</strong> previous<br />

versions of build<strong>in</strong>g standards a flat, a ward and an escape route are exemples of such<br />

fire compartments. Two separate exits are demanded from common premises. A door<br />

separat<strong>in</strong>g different parts of an escape route or an escape route from rooms where<br />

occupants are expected to know little about the locality, should be self clos<strong>in</strong>g. Fire<br />

appliances such as deliver<strong>in</strong>g conduits should be found <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs where alternative<br />

escape routes occur, e.g. firefight<strong>in</strong>g lifts, horizontal evacuation <strong>in</strong> ward premises.<br />

Protection of people<br />

The BBR-94 means considerable improvement of the prerequisites for safe escape or<br />

Residents <strong>Evacuation</strong> <strong>Capability</strong> <strong>in</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>gs…., Gun Hallberg, Domotic Lab. KTH, Stockholm 1993

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!