15.07.2014 Views

New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network

New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network

New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and they <strong>of</strong>ten rely on door-to-door sales<br />

representatives with high levels <strong>of</strong><br />

motivation, enthusiasm and persistence to<br />

achieve success. The recruitment <strong>of</strong> parttime<br />

staff or amateurs is vital, as is the need<br />

to train them quickly. Apart from<br />

commission-based incentive schemes little<br />

provision is made for high staff benefits or<br />

for security. So the human resources<br />

function in this type <strong>of</strong> organization is again<br />

able to take its lead from the underlying<br />

business strategy.<br />

The Human Resources Mission statement<br />

should answer the simple questions like;<br />

l "What is the people contribution <strong>of</strong> our<br />

business?"<br />

l "Why does our function exist?"<br />

l "Who are our customers?"<br />

l "What do our customers buy?" (Not to<br />

be confused with what you are selling.)<br />

l "What needs to happen in order for our<br />

function to be judged effective?"<br />

Answering the above questions specifically<br />

considering the current and future issues<br />

<strong>of</strong> Organization, Human Resources, Career<br />

development and Competences help in<br />

defining an appropriate Human Resources<br />

Strategy.<br />

Analysis:<br />

Conducting a rigorous SWOT analysis<br />

(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and<br />

threats) clarifies the current status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

function, the organization and its external<br />

operating environment. This is a process<br />

that should be undertaken on a regular basis<br />

in order to redefine the function's mission<br />

statement and to provide a quantitative and<br />

qualitative human resource input to the<br />

strategic planning process. Like most good<br />

techniques, the SWOT analysis is simple<br />

to understand, apply and convert into<br />

positive action.<br />

Given the complexity <strong>of</strong> forces now affecting<br />

organizations, it is particularly important to<br />

monitor the external environment. By<br />

appointing an individual or a group <strong>of</strong><br />

managers the HR should monitor the<br />

internal and external environment and to<br />

research the possible organizational<br />

implications. Line managers should be coopted<br />

into this process as it helps to<br />

generate new issues, understanding,<br />

ownership and commitment to any<br />

subsequent human resource activities. The<br />

need to assess the future demands from<br />

the external environment and the<br />

organization is vital. However, the process<br />

also involves a lot <strong>of</strong> internal analysis. For<br />

example, do you have the right skills? Has<br />

your team got management credibility? On<br />

what matters does the organization consult<br />

you? Having completed this status report<br />

the human resources function is then able<br />

to engage in the next step <strong>of</strong> strategy<br />

formulation.<br />

Planning:<br />

The need to generate some strategic human<br />

resource options and then to make strategic<br />

choices is how the rationalist framework<br />

progresses. Yet it poses a structuring issue.<br />

How do we develop, shape and order our<br />

options and choices? This can be resolved<br />

by focusing on our four dimensions: culture,<br />

organization, people and systems.<br />

Classic personnel activity has tended to<br />

cover the areas <strong>of</strong> people and organization,<br />

but even in these areas its actions have<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten lacked integration so that we tend to<br />

alter remuneration structures without<br />

reference to organization structure or people<br />

capability. The result is <strong>of</strong>ten a lack <strong>of</strong> coordination<br />

and direction. Culture is an<br />

interesting, and to some people,<br />

controversial inclusion.<br />

Organization culture - its measurement,<br />

monitoring and management - provides the<br />

potential to enhance organizational<br />

performance. While the difficulties and<br />

academic arguments over whether or not<br />

culture can be changed remain, the fact is<br />

that more and more chief executives are<br />

receptive to the concept <strong>of</strong> corporate culture<br />

as a possible source <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

advantage. Schein has argued that<br />

corporate culture is something that needs<br />

to be understood and managed as a key<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> human resources. Legge has<br />

termed the use <strong>of</strong> culture by personnel<br />

people to gain power a "deviant innovation".<br />

She sees this use <strong>of</strong> culture as an attempt<br />

by the human resources pr<strong>of</strong>essional to<br />

change the basis on which organizational<br />

success and the human resources<br />

function's contribution to it are evaluated.<br />

This requires the human resources<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional to act as a link between<br />

individual and corporate values.<br />

What is also interesting in this area is the<br />

traditional suspicion and sometimes hostility<br />

displayed by our pr<strong>of</strong>ession towards<br />

diagnostic tools, such as attitude or<br />

organization climate surveys. This is<br />

puzzling, for such devices provide a major<br />

opportunity for the function to make a<br />

significant contribution to the functioning <strong>of</strong><br />

the organization in a quantitative form.<br />

On the other hand, many human resources<br />

functions have not had very much to say<br />

about systems, outside traditional areas<br />

such as appraisal or management<br />

development. Few human resources<br />

functions have an input on systems such<br />

as those involving major information<br />

technology investments. Typically, the<br />

reaction from the IT pr<strong>of</strong>essional might be:<br />

"What would they know about it?" The fact<br />

is we probably know a whole lot more than<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the other functions including finance.<br />

Surely the real cost <strong>of</strong> information<br />

technology investment is not the hardware<br />

but the costs <strong>of</strong> training people to use it<br />

effectively. How many IT systems suffer from<br />

serious under capacity because <strong>of</strong><br />

inadequate training? Yet somehow this kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> debate only ever happens in a small<br />

select group <strong>of</strong> companies. The objective <strong>of</strong><br />

trying to develop a human resources<br />

strategy is to put human resource issues<br />

such as this on the boardroom agenda. In<br />

examining these four dimensions it is<br />

possible to develop a series <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

continuums which do in fact generate a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> options in terms <strong>of</strong> human resource<br />

activities. This merely provides some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

more obvious options, whereas an individual<br />

company analysis, set against the corporate<br />

objectives, will generate significantly more.<br />

Clearly some key choices have to be made.<br />

Once line management and the human<br />

resources function have followed through<br />

this process it is then possible to set some<br />

broad human resources objectives. These<br />

broad objectives then need to be broken<br />

down into the specialist areas such as<br />

remuneration, recruitment, appraisal and<br />

training and development.<br />

The recruitment choices may be whether<br />

the organization promotes only from within<br />

whether it goes to the external market. Does<br />

the organization have narrow or wide career<br />

paths? In the compensation area, does the<br />

organization promote high or low base<br />

salaries, few incentives or many incentives?<br />

Does the organization afford limited or high<br />

employment security? By following through<br />

this particular approach, each specialist<br />

function is required to set operational<br />

objectives which are consistent with the<br />

human resources mission statement and<br />

objectives and ultimately the corporate<br />

strategy. It should also ensure that<br />

remuneration programmes are consistent<br />

with career planning and development<br />

activities and so on.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the major responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the toplevel<br />

management is to highlight the<br />

corporate mission, vision, objectives,<br />

values, principles and culture throughout the<br />

organization. To inculcate this in the teams,<br />

the company will orient the new employees<br />

through training programmes and to<br />

continue the same the companies will<br />

circulate internal newsletters throughout the<br />

organization. When these teams come to<br />

the execution <strong>of</strong> their roles, responsibilities<br />

and duties and taking the decisions (Longterm<br />

or short-term) much more gaps will be<br />

found between the functional level strategy<br />

and the corporate strategy. The HR Strategy<br />

is also not exempt from the above. The HR<br />

strategy should focus on the Business<br />

Objectives and HR Objectives and it should<br />

integrate with the Culture, Organization,<br />

People and System. u H<br />

| <strong>HRD</strong> <strong>New</strong>s Letter | January 2007, Vol.22, Issue:10 11|

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!