New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network
New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network
New Year Resolutions of a Manager - National HRD Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and they <strong>of</strong>ten rely on door-to-door sales<br />
representatives with high levels <strong>of</strong><br />
motivation, enthusiasm and persistence to<br />
achieve success. The recruitment <strong>of</strong> parttime<br />
staff or amateurs is vital, as is the need<br />
to train them quickly. Apart from<br />
commission-based incentive schemes little<br />
provision is made for high staff benefits or<br />
for security. So the human resources<br />
function in this type <strong>of</strong> organization is again<br />
able to take its lead from the underlying<br />
business strategy.<br />
The Human Resources Mission statement<br />
should answer the simple questions like;<br />
l "What is the people contribution <strong>of</strong> our<br />
business?"<br />
l "Why does our function exist?"<br />
l "Who are our customers?"<br />
l "What do our customers buy?" (Not to<br />
be confused with what you are selling.)<br />
l "What needs to happen in order for our<br />
function to be judged effective?"<br />
Answering the above questions specifically<br />
considering the current and future issues<br />
<strong>of</strong> Organization, Human Resources, Career<br />
development and Competences help in<br />
defining an appropriate Human Resources<br />
Strategy.<br />
Analysis:<br />
Conducting a rigorous SWOT analysis<br />
(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and<br />
threats) clarifies the current status <strong>of</strong> the<br />
function, the organization and its external<br />
operating environment. This is a process<br />
that should be undertaken on a regular basis<br />
in order to redefine the function's mission<br />
statement and to provide a quantitative and<br />
qualitative human resource input to the<br />
strategic planning process. Like most good<br />
techniques, the SWOT analysis is simple<br />
to understand, apply and convert into<br />
positive action.<br />
Given the complexity <strong>of</strong> forces now affecting<br />
organizations, it is particularly important to<br />
monitor the external environment. By<br />
appointing an individual or a group <strong>of</strong><br />
managers the HR should monitor the<br />
internal and external environment and to<br />
research the possible organizational<br />
implications. Line managers should be coopted<br />
into this process as it helps to<br />
generate new issues, understanding,<br />
ownership and commitment to any<br />
subsequent human resource activities. The<br />
need to assess the future demands from<br />
the external environment and the<br />
organization is vital. However, the process<br />
also involves a lot <strong>of</strong> internal analysis. For<br />
example, do you have the right skills? Has<br />
your team got management credibility? On<br />
what matters does the organization consult<br />
you? Having completed this status report<br />
the human resources function is then able<br />
to engage in the next step <strong>of</strong> strategy<br />
formulation.<br />
Planning:<br />
The need to generate some strategic human<br />
resource options and then to make strategic<br />
choices is how the rationalist framework<br />
progresses. Yet it poses a structuring issue.<br />
How do we develop, shape and order our<br />
options and choices? This can be resolved<br />
by focusing on our four dimensions: culture,<br />
organization, people and systems.<br />
Classic personnel activity has tended to<br />
cover the areas <strong>of</strong> people and organization,<br />
but even in these areas its actions have<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten lacked integration so that we tend to<br />
alter remuneration structures without<br />
reference to organization structure or people<br />
capability. The result is <strong>of</strong>ten a lack <strong>of</strong> coordination<br />
and direction. Culture is an<br />
interesting, and to some people,<br />
controversial inclusion.<br />
Organization culture - its measurement,<br />
monitoring and management - provides the<br />
potential to enhance organizational<br />
performance. While the difficulties and<br />
academic arguments over whether or not<br />
culture can be changed remain, the fact is<br />
that more and more chief executives are<br />
receptive to the concept <strong>of</strong> corporate culture<br />
as a possible source <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />
advantage. Schein has argued that<br />
corporate culture is something that needs<br />
to be understood and managed as a key<br />
aspect <strong>of</strong> human resources. Legge has<br />
termed the use <strong>of</strong> culture by personnel<br />
people to gain power a "deviant innovation".<br />
She sees this use <strong>of</strong> culture as an attempt<br />
by the human resources pr<strong>of</strong>essional to<br />
change the basis on which organizational<br />
success and the human resources<br />
function's contribution to it are evaluated.<br />
This requires the human resources<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional to act as a link between<br />
individual and corporate values.<br />
What is also interesting in this area is the<br />
traditional suspicion and sometimes hostility<br />
displayed by our pr<strong>of</strong>ession towards<br />
diagnostic tools, such as attitude or<br />
organization climate surveys. This is<br />
puzzling, for such devices provide a major<br />
opportunity for the function to make a<br />
significant contribution to the functioning <strong>of</strong><br />
the organization in a quantitative form.<br />
On the other hand, many human resources<br />
functions have not had very much to say<br />
about systems, outside traditional areas<br />
such as appraisal or management<br />
development. Few human resources<br />
functions have an input on systems such<br />
as those involving major information<br />
technology investments. Typically, the<br />
reaction from the IT pr<strong>of</strong>essional might be:<br />
"What would they know about it?" The fact<br />
is we probably know a whole lot more than<br />
any <strong>of</strong> the other functions including finance.<br />
Surely the real cost <strong>of</strong> information<br />
technology investment is not the hardware<br />
but the costs <strong>of</strong> training people to use it<br />
effectively. How many IT systems suffer from<br />
serious under capacity because <strong>of</strong><br />
inadequate training? Yet somehow this kind<br />
<strong>of</strong> debate only ever happens in a small<br />
select group <strong>of</strong> companies. The objective <strong>of</strong><br />
trying to develop a human resources<br />
strategy is to put human resource issues<br />
such as this on the boardroom agenda. In<br />
examining these four dimensions it is<br />
possible to develop a series <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />
continuums which do in fact generate a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> options in terms <strong>of</strong> human resource<br />
activities. This merely provides some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
more obvious options, whereas an individual<br />
company analysis, set against the corporate<br />
objectives, will generate significantly more.<br />
Clearly some key choices have to be made.<br />
Once line management and the human<br />
resources function have followed through<br />
this process it is then possible to set some<br />
broad human resources objectives. These<br />
broad objectives then need to be broken<br />
down into the specialist areas such as<br />
remuneration, recruitment, appraisal and<br />
training and development.<br />
The recruitment choices may be whether<br />
the organization promotes only from within<br />
whether it goes to the external market. Does<br />
the organization have narrow or wide career<br />
paths? In the compensation area, does the<br />
organization promote high or low base<br />
salaries, few incentives or many incentives?<br />
Does the organization afford limited or high<br />
employment security? By following through<br />
this particular approach, each specialist<br />
function is required to set operational<br />
objectives which are consistent with the<br />
human resources mission statement and<br />
objectives and ultimately the corporate<br />
strategy. It should also ensure that<br />
remuneration programmes are consistent<br />
with career planning and development<br />
activities and so on.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the major responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the toplevel<br />
management is to highlight the<br />
corporate mission, vision, objectives,<br />
values, principles and culture throughout the<br />
organization. To inculcate this in the teams,<br />
the company will orient the new employees<br />
through training programmes and to<br />
continue the same the companies will<br />
circulate internal newsletters throughout the<br />
organization. When these teams come to<br />
the execution <strong>of</strong> their roles, responsibilities<br />
and duties and taking the decisions (Longterm<br />
or short-term) much more gaps will be<br />
found between the functional level strategy<br />
and the corporate strategy. The HR Strategy<br />
is also not exempt from the above. The HR<br />
strategy should focus on the Business<br />
Objectives and HR Objectives and it should<br />
integrate with the Culture, Organization,<br />
People and System. u H<br />
| <strong>HRD</strong> <strong>New</strong>s Letter | January 2007, Vol.22, Issue:10 11|