ZAÅ TITA PRAVA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI - Solidar
ZAÅ TITA PRAVA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI - Solidar
ZAÅ TITA PRAVA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI - Solidar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Labour rights study in Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />
- Article 143 and Article 152 of the entities’ labor law –<br />
Labour rights study in Bosnia and<br />
Herzegovina<br />
One specifi c problem burdening the labor market in BaH and its entities is the<br />
problem of employees who lost their job during the war. The entities’ labor law provisions<br />
(Article 143 of the BaH Labor law and Article 152 of the RS Labor law) stipulate that<br />
those employees who were left jobless during the war for they could not come to work<br />
and report, under certain rights are entitles to reestablish their labor-legal status, or to<br />
get compensation as a severance pay for getting illegally fi red. As employers refused<br />
to decide in accordance with employees’ claims related to reestablishment of the laborlegal<br />
status and calculations of severance pay, a Committee for Implementation of the<br />
Article 143 has been established in the BaH Federation while in the RS, claims are fi led<br />
to a specially created fund established by the RS government for these purposes and<br />
its duties are to pay severance pays. In the BaH Federation, aside from the fact that<br />
employees received fi nal decisions of the Committee, severance pays were still brought<br />
into questions so employees were forced to go to court and receive the severance pay<br />
via enforcement action. Still, for the most number of cases, authorities in charge would<br />
bring negative decisions. Also due to the process length, most employees stopped<br />
insisting on the process termination thinking that a lot of time had passed and that<br />
they would never be able to settle their claims. According to the legislation in force, the<br />
category of the so-called ‘waiting workers’ offi cially does not exist.<br />
In practice, however, the situation is completely different. Another example of a<br />
benefi ciary of ‘Initiative for Development and Cooperation BaH’ is a good illustration of<br />
how these provisions are applied:<br />
The benefi ciary has been ‘waiting’ for her job since 2001 and up until this day has<br />
been unable to resolve her situation and claim her status. She is still registered<br />
in PIO and health insurance fund registry. The company still exists in the court<br />
registry, it has not been erased, but it offi cially does not work. Her employment<br />
record card is still in this company’s premises. She gave up the lawsuit instigated<br />
by this company’s employees because she could not afford a legal representative.<br />
Activities related to proclaiming the company’s bankruptcy are under way.<br />
- Safety at work-<br />
The employer is due to assure necessary conditions for safety at work which<br />
assure employees’ lives and health, which familiarize employees with provisions from<br />
safety at work area, and is due to train the employee in such a way as to assure his or<br />
her life safety and health in order to prevent from accidents. The fact that the Law on<br />
20