Philips Sonicare FlexCare - Sonicare.com - Sonicare

References
1. Marsh PD. Oral ecology and its impact on oral microbial
diversity. In: Kuramitsu HK, Ellen RP, eds. Oral Bacterial
Ecology. Wymondham, UK: Horizon Scientific Press;
2000:11-65.
2. Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. Dental plaque as a biofilm. J Ind
Microbiol. 1995;15:169-175.
3. Kolenbrander PE. Coaggregation of human oral bacteria:
potential in the accretion of dental plaque. J Appl
Bacteriol. 1993;74 suppl:78S-86S.
4. Heersink J, Costerton W, Stoodley P. Influence of the
Sonicare toothbrush on the structure and thickness of
laboratory grown Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Am J
Dent. 2003;16:79-83.
5. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Belluomo G, et al. Effects of
sonic energy on monospecific biofilms of cariogenic
microorganisms. Am J Dent. 2006;19:3-6.
6. Tritten CB, Armitage GC. Comparison of a sonic and a
manual toothbrush for efficacy in supragingival plaque
removal and reduction of gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol.
1996;23:641-648.
7. Johnson BD, McInnes C. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy
and safety of a new sonic toothbrush. J Periodontol.
1994;65:692-697.
8. Stanford CM, Srikantha R, Wu CD. Efficacy of the
Sonicare toothbrush fluid dynamic action on removal of
human supragingival plaque. J Clin Dent. 1997;8(1 Spec
No):10-14.
9. Stanford CM, Srikantha R, Kirchner HL, et al. Removal of
supragingival plaque in an intraoral model by use of the
Sonicare toothbrush. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2000;2:115-119.
10. Wu Yuan CD, Anderson RD, McInnes C. Ability of the
Sonicare electronic toothbrush to generate dynamic fluid
activity that removes bacteria. J Clin Dent. 1994;5:89-93.
11. Hope CK, Wilson M. Effects of dynamic fluid activity
from an electric toothbrush on in vitro biofilms. J Clin
Periodontol. 2003;30:624-629.
12. Hope CK, Wilson M. Comparison of the interproximal
plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes
using in vitro oral biofilms. Am J Dent. 2002;15 Spec
No:7B-11B.
13. Hope CK, Petrie A, Wilson M. In vitro assessment of the
plaque-removing ability of hydrodynamic shear forces
produced beyond the bristles by 2 electric toothbrushes.
J Periodontol. 2003;74:1017-1022.
14. Adams H, Winston MT, Heersink J, et al. Development of
a laboratory model to assess the removal of biofilm from
interproximal spaces by powered toothbrushing. Am J
Dent. 2002;15 Spec No:12B-17B.
15. Sorensen JA, Nguyen HK. Evaluation of toothbrushinduced
dentin substrate wear using an in vitro ridged-configuration
model. Am J Dent. 2002;15 Spec No:26B-32B.
16. Peters AC, Wimpenny JW. A constant depth laboratory
model film fermenter. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32:263-270.
17. Kinniment SL, Wimpenny JW, Adams D, et al. Development
of a steady-state oral microbial biofilm community
using the constant-depth film fermenter. Microbiology.
1996;142:631-638.
18. Yuen AF, Nelson R, Johnson MR, et al. In vitro evaluation
of the efficacy and safety of the intelliclean system: interproximal
biofilm removal and dentin substrate wear.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(10 suppl 1):44-50.
19. Gomez-Suarez C, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Analysis
of bacterial detachment from substratum activity surfaces
by the passage of air-liquid interfaces. Appl Environ
Microbiol. 2001;67:2531-2537.
20. Parini MR, Eggett DL, Pitt WG. Removal of Streptococcus
mutans biofilm by bubbles. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:
1151-1156.
21. Parini MR, Pitt WG. Removal of oral biofilms by bubbles:
the effect of bubble impingement angle and sonic waves.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:1688-1693.
14 Compendium / September 2007 Vol. 28, No. 9 (Suppl 1)