In Touch Quarter 3 - 2014
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Presbyterian Church attacks the<br />
one Middle Eastern nation that<br />
protects Christians<br />
<strong>In</strong> June, the Presbyterian<br />
Church in the USA voted<br />
to divest from three<br />
companies deemed to profit<br />
from “Israeli occupation”.<br />
The motion passed by an<br />
exceptionally narrow margin<br />
(310-303) and will mean<br />
around $21 million worth<br />
of funds will be diverted away from Caterpillar,<br />
Motorola and Hewlett-Packard.<br />
Speaking immediately after the vote, moderator<br />
for the church meeting, Heath Rada said that the<br />
decision was, “in no way…a reflection of our lack of<br />
love for our Jewish brothers and sisters”.<br />
It is unlikely the Jewish community will believe<br />
Mr Rada’s words. And why should they? History<br />
is full of Christians showing a lack of love toward<br />
their Jewish brothers and sisters, in everything from<br />
Martin Luther’s anti-Semitic leaflet “On The Jews<br />
And Their Lies” to the silence among most Christian<br />
leaders during the Holocaust.<br />
Divestment may not be as extreme as these<br />
horrific examples, but needless to say the motion<br />
will do nothing to improve relations between Jews<br />
and Christians.<br />
Divestment in this case has masqueraded itself<br />
as being part of a ‘peaceful pro-justice initiative’.<br />
The reality couldn’t be further from the truth as an<br />
extremist movement known as BDS has backed the<br />
Church’s decision.<br />
BDS stands for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions.<br />
Its leaders have stated that the movement’s goal is<br />
the end of Israel entirely, and they reject a two-state<br />
solution (Omar Bargouti, John Spritzler, Ahmed<br />
Moor). Even the notoriously pro-Palestinian<br />
academic Norman Finklestein has admitted BDS<br />
is a “cult” with a “large segment” that wants to<br />
“eliminate Israel”.<br />
The idea of boycotting everything Israel produces<br />
is near impossible for the 21 st Century Westerner.<br />
<strong>In</strong>stant messaging, voicemail technology and even<br />
SIM cards were developed in Israel. Boycotting<br />
Israel means never using Google (they have offices<br />
in Israel). After boycotting Google, you’ll have to<br />
burn your mobile phone and laptop.<br />
The Presbyterian Church must realise that by<br />
listening to the BDS movement they are supporting<br />
a movement who are anti-Israel and more<br />
importantly anti-peace. It’s a cause that often seems<br />
to care more about the destruction of Israel than the<br />
wellbeing of Palestinians.<br />
What crimes have these three companies<br />
committed which warrant divestment? Caterpillar<br />
sells bulldozers to the US who then pass them on to<br />
Israel. Caterpillar itself does not and never has sold<br />
anything to Israel. To repeat, Caterpillar has sold<br />
a grand total of zero bulldozers to Israel. Not only<br />
does Caterpillar have no say in how its vehicles are<br />
resold, but legally the company cannot turn down<br />
the US military as a client. Divestment in this case is<br />
completely nonsensical.<br />
What about Motorola? The Israeli Defence<br />
Force (IDF) buys the company’s communication<br />
technologies. This is the same IDF that the former<br />
commander of the British forces in Afghanistan Col.<br />
Richard Kemp praised for doing “more to safeguard<br />
the rights of civilians in the combat zone than any other<br />
army in the history of warfare.”<br />
Finally we turn to Hewlett-Packard who supplies<br />
biometric scanners at Israeli checkpoints. These<br />
airport security style checkpoints exist to prevent<br />
terrorist attacks. It’s ironic that the reason HP<br />
got involved was because the Palestinians often<br />
complain passing through checkpoints can take<br />
hours. HP’s answer was to design technology that<br />
would speed up the process without endangering<br />
lives. That’s right, HP are helping the Palestinians.<br />
Yet the Presbyterians think they’re doing the<br />
Palestinians a favour by divesting from this<br />
technology.<br />
Denominations and Christians across the world<br />
must wake up. BDS is anti-peace. It singles out<br />
the only democracy in the Middle East for attack.<br />
Churches must stop supporting this hateful<br />
ideology.<br />
There is a tragic irony here. What kind of Church<br />
attacks the only Middle Eastern nation that<br />
guarantees the safety of Christians? The Presbyterian<br />
Church has been at pains to state their action of<br />
divestment has nothing to do with BDS. But talk<br />
is cheap. Their actions speak volumes. Aiding the<br />
4 // IN TOUCH