18.07.2014 Views

Attitude inoculation - Sozialpsychologie

Attitude inoculation - Sozialpsychologie

Attitude inoculation - Sozialpsychologie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rolf van Dick<br />

Social Psychology (Winter 2009/10)<br />

Lecture 5: Persuasion and <strong>Attitude</strong> Change<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items (last week)<br />

1) According to which model are attitudes described variously as<br />

containing feelings, likes, dislikes, behavioural intentions, thoughts and<br />

ideas?<br />

A) the three component model B) the dual model of attitudes<br />

C) the cognitive consistency model D) the one-component model<br />

2) Dissonance theory and balance theory are both examples of:<br />

A) accidental discoveries in the study of attitudes<br />

B) cognitive consistency theories<br />

C) social identity theory<br />

D) behaviourism in the study of attitudes<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items (last week)<br />

3) The theory of planned behaviour extended the theory of reasoned<br />

action by:<br />

A) specifying the questions that are asked in order to predict behaviour<br />

B) re-arranging the three components of “beliefs“, “intentions“ and<br />

“action“<br />

C) adding the variable of perceived behavioural control<br />

D) defining “intention“<br />

4) In balance theory, a triad is balanced when there is (are):<br />

A) two positive relationships<br />

B) just one negative relationship<br />

C) an odd number of negative relationships<br />

D) none of the above<br />

Social Psychology


Schedule<br />

1. Introducing Social Psychology 14.10.<br />

2. Attribution and Social Knowledge 21.10.<br />

3. Self and Identity 28.10.<br />

4. <strong>Attitude</strong>s 04.11.<br />

5. Persuasion and <strong>Attitude</strong> Change 11.11.<br />

6. Social Influence 18.11.<br />

7. People in Groups 25.11.<br />

8. Prejudice and Discrimination 02.12.<br />

9. Intergroup Behavior 09.12.<br />

10.Leadership and Decision Making 16.12.<br />

11.Aggression 13.01.<br />

12.Affiliation, Attraction, and Love 20.01.<br />

13.Prosocial Behavior 27.01.<br />

14.Revision 03.02.<br />

15.Exam 10.02.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

Some terms (1/2)<br />

• Persuasion - Überzeugung/Überredung<br />

• neatly – ordentlich<br />

• extraneous – von außen<br />

• to enhance – fördern / steigern<br />

• uptight – angespannt<br />

• distracted – zerstreut<br />

• compliance – Folgsamkeit / Fügsamkeit<br />

• to enhance – erleichtern<br />

• ingratiation – Anbiederung<br />

• to emphasise - betonen<br />

• Elaboration-likelihood model – Modell der Verarbeitungstiefe<br />

• attempt - Versuch<br />

• Inoculation – Impfung


Some terms (2/2)<br />

• trustworthiness – Vertrauenswürdigkeit / Zuverlässigkeit<br />

• Source derogation – Abwertung der Quelle (der Botschaft)<br />

• tedium – Überdruss<br />

• slight – ein wenig<br />

• heuristics – Faustregeln<br />

• superficial – oberflächlich<br />

• to preserve – bewahren / beibehalten<br />

• obvious – offensichtlich<br />

• to induce – herbeiführen / bewegen<br />

• assault – Angriff<br />

• conformity - Angepasstheit<br />

Social Psychology


Focus Questions<br />

• Someone offers you sum of money for your prized racing bike,<br />

which you believe is a fair prize. After they have checked their bank<br />

balance, the would-be purchaser reduces the offer by 15%, saying<br />

that‘s all they can afford. Could such a tactic work?<br />

• You have just joined the army. Along with other cadets you listen to<br />

an amazing talk by an officer skilled in the use of survival techniques<br />

in difficult combat conditions. Among other things, he asks you to<br />

eat some fried grasshoppers. „Try to imagine this is the real thing!<br />

You know, you might have to do this to save your live one day“, he<br />

says. Despite your first reaction, you go ahead and eat them. Would<br />

you end up liking the delicacy more if the officer‘s style of<br />

presentation was warm and friendly or cold and distant?<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

In General<br />

The various models of the persuasion process; tactics for<br />

enhancing compliance; the theory of cognitive<br />

dissonance and factors which guard against attitude<br />

change.<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific topics I<br />

<strong>Attitude</strong>s, arguments and behaviour<br />

• Discrepancies between attitude and behaviour allow attitude change<br />

to occur.<br />

• Two general approaches to attitude change – the first emphasises<br />

the use of persuasive arguments; the second emphasises<br />

behavioural involvement.<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific topics II<br />

Persuasive communications<br />

• The important links and steps in the persuasion process (e.g.<br />

communicator, message, and audience).<br />

• How persuasion is affected by features of the communicator (e.g.<br />

source credibility), features of the message and the medium (e.g.<br />

repetition, use of feararousal, appeals to affect versus fact, use of<br />

video, audio and written forms) and features of the audience (e.g.<br />

self-esteem, sex).<br />

• Current models of persuasion – Petty and Cacioppo’s elaborationlikelihood<br />

model; Chaiken’s heuristic-systematic processing model.<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific topics III<br />

Compliance: Interpersonal influence<br />

• Various tactics for enhancing compliance (e.g. ingratiation,<br />

reciprocity, and multiple request techniques such as the foot-in-thedoor,<br />

door-in-the-face and low-ball tactics).<br />

• The concept of action research and its application to attitude change.<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific topics IV<br />

<strong>Attitude</strong> behaviour discrepancy and cognitive dissonance<br />

• The nature of the theory of cognitive dissonance and its application<br />

to a variety of situations involving attitude or behaviour change.<br />

• Three research paradigms associated with the theory of cognitive<br />

dissonance – effort justification, induced compliance and free<br />

choice.<br />

• The strengths and weaknesses of cognitive dissonance theory and<br />

to be aware of theoretical alternatives (e.g. self-perception theory).<br />

Social Psychology


Teaching objectives<br />

Specific topics V<br />

When attitude change fails<br />

• Three major reasons why attempts at persuasion fail – reactance,<br />

forewarning and the <strong>inoculation</strong> effect.<br />

• How knowledge of these factors can be used to reduce the likelihood<br />

of attitude change.<br />

Social Psychology


The persuasion process:<br />

communicator, message, and audience<br />

The field of attitude change is vast and complex.<br />

Hovland headed the Yale approach to<br />

communication and persuasion, which studied<br />

variables dealing with the communicator, the<br />

source of the message, the message itself, and<br />

the context in which persuasion occurs.<br />

Social Psychology


The Yale approach to communication and persuasion<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on Janis & Hovland (1959).


The effect of communicator credibility and position<br />

discrepancy on opinion change<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Bochner & Insko (1996).


The effects of source modality and message<br />

difficulty on opinion change<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on Chaiken & Eagly (1983).


The persuasion process:<br />

communicator, message, and audience<br />

• Several aspects of a communicator affect<br />

whether a person is evaluated favorably.<br />

– Credibility<br />

• Expertise<br />

• Trustworthiness<br />

– Liking<br />

Social Psychology


The persuasion process:<br />

communicator, message, and audience<br />

• We are persuaded by the opinions of our<br />

reference groups, those we like or identify<br />

with.<br />

– This occurs both because of the motivational<br />

factors of liking and perceived similarity, and<br />

because messages from in-groups are more likely<br />

to be processed using the central route (see ELM<br />

later).<br />

Social Psychology


The persuasion process:<br />

communicator, message, and audience<br />

• Source derogation involves deciding the source<br />

is unreliable or negative in some way. It can<br />

make all future as well as current arguments<br />

from that source less powerful.<br />

Social Psychology


The persuasion process:<br />

communicator, message, and audience<br />

• Repetition and familiarity tend to increase<br />

liking, but only up to a point.<br />

• Repetition may help people process strong<br />

arguments more completely but expose the flaws in<br />

weak arguments.<br />

• Repetition may lead to tedium; this can be dealt<br />

with by having ads that provide slight variations on<br />

a theme.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

Two important areas of our lives that employ relevant<br />

principles from social psychological research are<br />

advertising and political propaganda.<br />

Two models, each dealing with how a persuasive message<br />

is learned, draw on developments in research on<br />

cognition. Petty and Cacioppo’s elaboration likelihood<br />

model proposes that, when people attend to a message<br />

carefully, they use a central route to process it; otherwise<br />

they use a peripheral route. Chaiken’s heuristic–<br />

systematic model suggests that people use systematic<br />

processing when they attend to a message carefully;<br />

otherwise they use heuristic processing.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

Both theories state that under certain<br />

conditions, people are motivated to pay<br />

attention to and think about the facts in a<br />

message; this is referred to as the central<br />

route to persuasion.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

Under other conditions, people are not<br />

motivated to pay attention to the facts a<br />

message presents and only attend to<br />

superficial characteristics such as who<br />

delivers it and how long it is. In this case<br />

people may be influenced by the peripheral<br />

route to persuasion.<br />

Social Psychology


The elaboration–likelihood<br />

model of persuasion<br />

Petty & Cacioppo (1986)<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

Which route to attitude change will people<br />

take? One determinant is the personal<br />

relevance of the topic. The more relevant the<br />

topic, the more people will take the central<br />

route to persuasion. Here, they will be<br />

influenced the most by the strength of the<br />

arguments.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

Dual process models of persuasion


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

The route to attitude change also depends on<br />

people’s ability to pay attention to the<br />

arguments. The more distracted people are,<br />

the more they will take the peripheral route.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

<strong>Attitude</strong> change will be more long-lasting if it<br />

occurs through the central route.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

In order to get people to use the central<br />

processing route, you need to get their<br />

attention. This can be done by playing to<br />

their emotions.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

However, people want to preserve good<br />

moods, so they will avoid activities that might<br />

spoil their good mood. This means that<br />

people in good moods will often avoid paying<br />

close attention to a persuasive<br />

communication, because they think that doing<br />

so will lower their mood.<br />

Social Psychology


Dual process models of persuasion<br />

Fear-arousing communications are most<br />

effective if they induce a moderate amount of<br />

fear and people believe that listening to the<br />

message will reduce this fear. If the<br />

message is too scary or not scary enough, it<br />

will fail.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

The inverted U-curve relationship between<br />

fear and attitude change


Tactics for enhancing compliance<br />

A variety of techniques that deal with ways of<br />

inducing another person to comply with our<br />

requests has been intensively studied: these<br />

include ingratiation, reciprocity and guilt arousal.<br />

There are also multiple-request techniques (footin-the-door,<br />

door-in-the-face and low-balling), in<br />

which a first request functions as a set-up for the<br />

second, real request.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

Three classic techniques for inducing compliance


The foot-in-the-door technique: compliance with an<br />

impossible request followed by a possible request<br />

Based on data from<br />

Dolinski (2000), Experiment 2<br />

Social Psychology


The theory of cognitive dissonance<br />

Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory is a major<br />

approach to the topic of attitude change. It<br />

addresses not only conflict between a person’s<br />

beliefs but discrepancy between behaviour and<br />

underlying attitudes, and behaviour and selfconception.<br />

It includes three variations on the<br />

way in which dissonance is brought about: effort<br />

justification, induced compliance and free<br />

choice.<br />

Social Psychology


Social Psychology<br />

The theory of cognitive dissonance


The effect of incentives on evaluating a boring task<br />

in an induced- compliance context<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Festinger & Carlsmith (1959).


Interest in a group discussion in relation to the<br />

severity of the initiation procedure<br />

Based on data from Aronson & Mills (1959).<br />

Social Psychology


Change in weight among overweight women after<br />

expending psychological effort<br />

Social Psychology<br />

Based on data from Cooper & Axom (1982).


Degree of liking fried grasshoppers as food by military<br />

cadets in relation to the interpersonal style of an officer<br />

Based on data from Zimbardo, Weisenberg, Firestone & Levy (1965).<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

Reactance is an increase in resistance to<br />

persuasion when the communicator’s efforts to<br />

persuade are obvious. Techniques for building<br />

up resistance include forewarning and the<br />

<strong>inoculation</strong> defence. In recent years,<br />

manufacturing companies have used inoculating<br />

media releases to shore up consumer loyalty.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

• <strong>Attitude</strong> Inoculation<br />

One way to bolster people against persuasion<br />

attempts is to have them consider the arguments for<br />

and against their attitude before somebody attacks it.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

• <strong>Attitude</strong> Inoculation<br />

McGuire (1964)<br />

<strong>Attitude</strong> <strong>inoculation</strong> procedure does this by exposing<br />

people to a small dose of the argument against their<br />

position; this induced them to counter-argue and<br />

provide a “vaccination” that helps people ward off<br />

later, stronger influence attempts.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

• Resisting Peer Pressure<br />

<strong>Attitude</strong> <strong>inoculation</strong> that is designed to combat<br />

affectively based persuasion techniques can be<br />

effective at helping people resist peer pressure.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

• When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang:<br />

Reactance Theory<br />

Brehm (1966)<br />

It is important not to use too heavy a hand when trying<br />

to immunize people against assaults on their attitudes.<br />

If you administer too strong a prohibition, the<br />

prohibition may boomerang and lead to an increase in<br />

the prohibited activity.<br />

Social Psychology


Resistance to persuasion<br />

• When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang:<br />

Reactance Theory<br />

Reactance theory explains this by saying that strong<br />

prohibitions threaten a person’s feeling of freedom,<br />

and engaging in the forbidden behavior is an attempt<br />

to restore that feeling of freedom.<br />

Social Psychology


Literature, Film and TV<br />

• Tin Men: 1987 comedy written and directed by Barry Levinson,<br />

starring Richard Dreyfuss and Danny Devito. Two aluminium<br />

salesmen are in competition. They use all their skills to outsell each<br />

other by persuading customers.<br />

• Matchstick Men: 2003 black comedy by Ridley Scott, starring<br />

Nicholas Cage. A pair of con artists spend their lives engaging in<br />

persuasion and living a double life to avoid being caught. They pull<br />

off scams, but the last huge scam backfires big time on Nicholas<br />

Cage’s character who becomes the victim of his own con.<br />

• Glengarry Glen Ross: 1992 film directed by James Foley, written by<br />

David Mamet, and starring Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Ed Harris,<br />

Kevin Spacey, Alec Baldwin and others. The film is about real estate<br />

office and the different ways in which salesmen under pressure try<br />

to sell, and to persuade others.<br />

Social Psychology


Your Portfolio<br />

• Read the chapter along the slides!<br />

• Answer the sample questions!<br />

• What have I learned?<br />

• What did I NOT understand?<br />

• How can I apply the knowledge?<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items<br />

1) One of the following characteristics is a minimum requirement for a<br />

persuasive message to have some success:<br />

A) the message has to be written neatly<br />

B) no extraneous factor should interrupt the information flow<br />

C) the audience needs to give some attention to the message<br />

D) the message must be very sensible<br />

2) The content of a message has an impact on whether people are<br />

persuaded or not. Which of the following is NOT directly related to the<br />

message component?<br />

A) Fear-arousing messages are more likely to persuade<br />

B) Evaluatively biased terminology enhances persuasion<br />

C) A message delivered by an expert is more persuasive than one<br />

delivered by a non-expert<br />

D) People are more easily persuaded if they think that the message is not<br />

aimed at them<br />

Social Psychology


Sample MC-Items<br />

3) When Karen hears graphic news about disasters she becomes<br />

somewhat stressed, focussed and attentive. However, when she gets<br />

extremely stressed, she is so uptight that she becomes distracted from<br />

the details of the story. This sequence characterises the:<br />

A) J-curve B) boomerang effect<br />

C) reactance response D) the inverted U-curve<br />

4) In Petty and Cacioppo‘s (1986) elaboration-likelihood model<br />

A) people are never assumed to take mental shortcuts<br />

B) a central route is used when the message is delivered in visual form<br />

C) a peripheral route is used when attention to the argument of a<br />

message is low<br />

D) persuasion occurs only when the source is likeable<br />

Social Psychology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!