Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library
Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library
Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Agile</strong> launch is one component required<br />
to support the goals of the<br />
Operationally <strong>Responsive</strong> <strong>Space</strong><br />
(ORS) Office, whose mission is to rapidly<br />
augment DOD space systems to support<br />
the warfighter in near real time. For ORS,<br />
“rapidly” is defined as mission call-up to<br />
launch in a matter of days or weeks. The target<br />
launch time for augmentation missions<br />
is six days. Typical DOD missions currently<br />
take years <strong>and</strong> even decades to become<br />
operational on orbit, so the ORS goal is an<br />
ambitious one. <strong>Agile</strong> space launch involves<br />
planning, acquiring, <strong>and</strong> executing a launch<br />
quickly, but more than that, it requires<br />
flexibility in mission design, availability of<br />
multiple spacelift options, <strong>and</strong> a readiness to<br />
seize opportunities.<br />
The Aerospace Corporation has provided<br />
systems engineering support to the<br />
ORS Office since its founding in May<br />
2007. Aerospace has also provided systems<br />
engineering <strong>and</strong> mission assurance support<br />
to the DOD <strong>Space</strong> Test Program (STP)<br />
since its inception in 1965. STP is the<br />
primary provider of mission design, spacecraft<br />
acquisition, integration, launch, <strong>and</strong><br />
on- orbit operations for DOD space experiments<br />
<strong>and</strong> technology demonstrations. The<br />
typical mission timeline is three years from<br />
start to on-orbit operability, <strong>and</strong> for two<br />
recent missions, the timeline was under 12<br />
months from call-up to launch.<br />
These two recent missions, Kodiak Star<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nanosat-2, illustrate the successful<br />
application of the principles of agile space<br />
launch. For the Kodiak Star mission, STP<br />
<strong>and</strong> NASA, in approximately 11 months,<br />
identified <strong>and</strong> prepared a payload to fly<br />
aboard the Athena I launch vehicle. The<br />
Nanosat-2 spacecraft, in storage for a year,<br />
was reconfigured in four months to fly on<br />
the Delta IV heavy-lift vehicle demonstration<br />
in 2004.<br />
These two launches, as case studies, provide<br />
valuable insights into how to reach the<br />
ambitious launch goal of six days. For both<br />
missions, Aerospace was a key member of<br />
a small team that provided systems engineering<br />
support directly to the Air Force<br />
mission manager, <strong>and</strong> then supported the<br />
readiness review process with a mission<br />
risk assessment to the Air Force mission<br />
director.<br />
A survey of current launch vehicles that<br />
endeavor to have a “rapid” launch capability<br />
is also useful in underst<strong>and</strong>ing how far<br />
the industry must come to meet the six-day<br />
goal. For example, the Minotaur family of<br />
vehicles, which use surplus ballistic missile<br />
components, provides low-cost, reliable<br />
space launch capability to meet U.S.<br />
government small-satellite requirements.<br />
The Falcon 1 <strong>and</strong> Raptor series launch vehicles<br />
provide additional launch options for<br />
small payloads from STP <strong>and</strong> other DOD<br />
programs. Aerospace was a member of the<br />
government team developing the payloads<br />
that flew on the eight Minotaur missions to<br />
date <strong>and</strong> is involved at varying levels in five<br />
of the seven Minotaur missions next scheduled<br />
for flight.<br />
STP is also working to use the excess<br />
capability—the additional launch vehicle<br />
performance <strong>and</strong> volume margin not used<br />
by the primary mission—on launches of<br />
government Evolved Expendable Launch<br />
Vehicles (EELV) to fly both research <strong>and</strong><br />
operational payloads. Aerospace was instrumental<br />
in the design <strong>and</strong> development<br />
of the EELV Secondary Payload Adapter<br />
Enhanced fairings <strong>and</strong> accuracy available for each vehicle<br />
ORS compatible due to Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD)<br />
heritage components<br />
Minotaur 1 Minotaur 2 Minotaur 3 Minotaur 4 Minotaur 5<br />
S1<br />
S2<br />
S3<br />
S4<br />
S5<br />
Application<br />
M55A1 (GFE)<br />
SR 19 (GFE)<br />
Orion 50XL<br />
Orion 38<br />
HAPS (Optional)<br />
<strong>Space</strong>lift<br />
M55A1 (GFE)<br />
SR 19 (GFE)<br />
M57 (GFE) (Orion 50XL optional)<br />
(N/A)<br />
(N/A)<br />
Suborbital/target<br />
SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />
SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />
SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />
Super HAPS<br />
(N/A)<br />
Suborbital/target<br />
SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />
SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />
SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />
Orion 38 (Star 48BV optional)<br />
HAPS (optional)<br />
<strong>Space</strong>lift<br />
SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />
SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />
SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />
Star 48BV<br />
Star 37FMV<br />
MTO/GTO/Lunar<br />
Performance<br />
581 kg to LEO<br />
Larger fairing optional<br />
LEO=185 km, 28.5°<br />
Ballistic=VAFB to RTS<br />
441 kg ballistic<br />
(524 kg w/ Orion 50XL)<br />
Larger front end optional<br />
3064 kg ballistic<br />
Larger fairing optional<br />
1636 kg to LEO<br />
(1931 kg w/ Star 48BV)<br />
700 kg to MTO (GPS)<br />
584 kg to GTO<br />
392 kg to TLI<br />
Above: The Minotaur 1 through 5 vehicles with their corresponding application<br />
<strong>and</strong> performance information. Aerospace was a member of the government team<br />
developing the payloads that have flown on the eight Minotaur missions to date<br />
<strong>and</strong> is involved at varying levels for flights of five more scheduled for launch.<br />
Previous page: An Athena 1 launch vehicle lifts off the launchpad at Kodiak Launch<br />
Complex with the Kodiak Star spacecraft onboard Sept. 29, 2001.<br />
Crosslink Summer 2009 • 19