18.07.2014 Views

Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library

Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library

Developing Responsive and Agile Space Systems - Space-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Agile</strong> launch is one component required<br />

to support the goals of the<br />

Operationally <strong>Responsive</strong> <strong>Space</strong><br />

(ORS) Office, whose mission is to rapidly<br />

augment DOD space systems to support<br />

the warfighter in near real time. For ORS,<br />

“rapidly” is defined as mission call-up to<br />

launch in a matter of days or weeks. The target<br />

launch time for augmentation missions<br />

is six days. Typical DOD missions currently<br />

take years <strong>and</strong> even decades to become<br />

operational on orbit, so the ORS goal is an<br />

ambitious one. <strong>Agile</strong> space launch involves<br />

planning, acquiring, <strong>and</strong> executing a launch<br />

quickly, but more than that, it requires<br />

flexibility in mission design, availability of<br />

multiple spacelift options, <strong>and</strong> a readiness to<br />

seize opportunities.<br />

The Aerospace Corporation has provided<br />

systems engineering support to the<br />

ORS Office since its founding in May<br />

2007. Aerospace has also provided systems<br />

engineering <strong>and</strong> mission assurance support<br />

to the DOD <strong>Space</strong> Test Program (STP)<br />

since its inception in 1965. STP is the<br />

primary provider of mission design, spacecraft<br />

acquisition, integration, launch, <strong>and</strong><br />

on- orbit operations for DOD space experiments<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology demonstrations. The<br />

typical mission timeline is three years from<br />

start to on-orbit operability, <strong>and</strong> for two<br />

recent missions, the timeline was under 12<br />

months from call-up to launch.<br />

These two recent missions, Kodiak Star<br />

<strong>and</strong> Nanosat-2, illustrate the successful<br />

application of the principles of agile space<br />

launch. For the Kodiak Star mission, STP<br />

<strong>and</strong> NASA, in approximately 11 months,<br />

identified <strong>and</strong> prepared a payload to fly<br />

aboard the Athena I launch vehicle. The<br />

Nanosat-2 spacecraft, in storage for a year,<br />

was reconfigured in four months to fly on<br />

the Delta IV heavy-lift vehicle demonstration<br />

in 2004.<br />

These two launches, as case studies, provide<br />

valuable insights into how to reach the<br />

ambitious launch goal of six days. For both<br />

missions, Aerospace was a key member of<br />

a small team that provided systems engineering<br />

support directly to the Air Force<br />

mission manager, <strong>and</strong> then supported the<br />

readiness review process with a mission<br />

risk assessment to the Air Force mission<br />

director.<br />

A survey of current launch vehicles that<br />

endeavor to have a “rapid” launch capability<br />

is also useful in underst<strong>and</strong>ing how far<br />

the industry must come to meet the six-day<br />

goal. For example, the Minotaur family of<br />

vehicles, which use surplus ballistic missile<br />

components, provides low-cost, reliable<br />

space launch capability to meet U.S.<br />

government small-satellite requirements.<br />

The Falcon 1 <strong>and</strong> Raptor series launch vehicles<br />

provide additional launch options for<br />

small payloads from STP <strong>and</strong> other DOD<br />

programs. Aerospace was a member of the<br />

government team developing the payloads<br />

that flew on the eight Minotaur missions to<br />

date <strong>and</strong> is involved at varying levels in five<br />

of the seven Minotaur missions next scheduled<br />

for flight.<br />

STP is also working to use the excess<br />

capability—the additional launch vehicle<br />

performance <strong>and</strong> volume margin not used<br />

by the primary mission—on launches of<br />

government Evolved Expendable Launch<br />

Vehicles (EELV) to fly both research <strong>and</strong><br />

operational payloads. Aerospace was instrumental<br />

in the design <strong>and</strong> development<br />

of the EELV Secondary Payload Adapter<br />

Enhanced fairings <strong>and</strong> accuracy available for each vehicle<br />

ORS compatible due to Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD)<br />

heritage components<br />

Minotaur 1 Minotaur 2 Minotaur 3 Minotaur 4 Minotaur 5<br />

S1<br />

S2<br />

S3<br />

S4<br />

S5<br />

Application<br />

M55A1 (GFE)<br />

SR 19 (GFE)<br />

Orion 50XL<br />

Orion 38<br />

HAPS (Optional)<br />

<strong>Space</strong>lift<br />

M55A1 (GFE)<br />

SR 19 (GFE)<br />

M57 (GFE) (Orion 50XL optional)<br />

(N/A)<br />

(N/A)<br />

Suborbital/target<br />

SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />

SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />

SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />

Super HAPS<br />

(N/A)<br />

Suborbital/target<br />

SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />

SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />

SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />

Orion 38 (Star 48BV optional)<br />

HAPS (optional)<br />

<strong>Space</strong>lift<br />

SR-118 S1 (GFE)<br />

SR-119 S2 (GFE)<br />

SR-120 S3 (GFE)<br />

Star 48BV<br />

Star 37FMV<br />

MTO/GTO/Lunar<br />

Performance<br />

581 kg to LEO<br />

Larger fairing optional<br />

LEO=185 km, 28.5°<br />

Ballistic=VAFB to RTS<br />

441 kg ballistic<br />

(524 kg w/ Orion 50XL)<br />

Larger front end optional<br />

3064 kg ballistic<br />

Larger fairing optional<br />

1636 kg to LEO<br />

(1931 kg w/ Star 48BV)<br />

700 kg to MTO (GPS)<br />

584 kg to GTO<br />

392 kg to TLI<br />

Above: The Minotaur 1 through 5 vehicles with their corresponding application<br />

<strong>and</strong> performance information. Aerospace was a member of the government team<br />

developing the payloads that have flown on the eight Minotaur missions to date<br />

<strong>and</strong> is involved at varying levels for flights of five more scheduled for launch.<br />

Previous page: An Athena 1 launch vehicle lifts off the launchpad at Kodiak Launch<br />

Complex with the Kodiak Star spacecraft onboard Sept. 29, 2001.<br />

Crosslink Summer 2009 • 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!