19.07.2014 Views

[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath

[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath

[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUmION 3<br />

Since this is a book on control and instrumentation, we might also mention that a<br />

high-level alarm and/or an interlock (a device to shut <strong>of</strong>f the feed if the level gets too<br />

high) should be installed to guarantee that the tank would not spill over. The tragic<br />

accidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Bhopal illustrate the need <strong>for</strong> welldesigned<br />

and well-instrumented plants.<br />

The design <strong>of</strong> the system would involve an economic balance between the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> a taller tank and the cost <strong>of</strong> a bigger pipe, since the bigger the pipe diameter the<br />

lower is the liquid height. Figure 1.2 shows the curve <strong>of</strong> !i versus F <strong>for</strong> a specific<br />

numerical case.<br />

So far we have considered just the traditional steadystate design aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

this fluid flow system. Now let us think about what would happen dynamically if we<br />

changed Fe. How will he) and F$) vary with time? Obviously F eventually has to<br />

end up at the new value <strong>of</strong> F,. We can easily determine from the steadystate design<br />

curve <strong>of</strong> Fig. 1.2 where h will go at the new steadystate. But what paths will h(,, and<br />

Fgb take to get to their new steadystates?<br />

Figure 1.3 sketches the problem. The question is which curves (1 or 2) represent<br />

the actual paths that F and h will follow. Curves 1 show gradual increases in<br />

h and F to their new steadystate values. However, the paths could follow curves 2<br />

where the liquid height rises above its final steadystate value. This is called<br />

“overshoot.” Clearly, if the peak <strong>of</strong> the overshoot in h is above the top <strong>of</strong> the tank,<br />

we would be in trouble.<br />

Our steadystate design calculations tell us nothing about what the dynamic<br />

response to the system will be. They tell us where we will start and where we will<br />

end up but not how we get there. This kind <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation is what a study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> the system will reveal. We will return to this system later in the book to<br />

derive a mathematical model <strong>of</strong> it and to determine its dynamic response quantitatively<br />

by simulation.<br />

Example 1.2. Consider the heat exchanger sketched in Fig. 1.4. An oil stream passes<br />

through the tube side <strong>of</strong> a tube-in-shell heat exchanger and is heated by condensing<br />

steam on the shell side. The steam condensate leaves through a steam trap (a device

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!