[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath
[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath
[Luyben] Process Mod.. - Student subdomain for University of Bath
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANALYSIS OF MULTIYARIABLE SYSTEMS 575<br />
One important aspect <strong>of</strong> the MRI calculations should be emphasized at this<br />
point. The singular values depend on the scaling use in the steadystate gains <strong>of</strong><br />
the transfer functions. If different engineering units are used <strong>for</strong> the gains, different<br />
singular values will be calculated. For example, as we change from time units<br />
<strong>of</strong> minutes to hours or change from temperature units in Fahrenheit to Celsius,<br />
the values <strong>of</strong> the singular values will change. Thus the comparison <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />
control structures and processes can be obscured by this effect.<br />
The practical solution to the problem is to always use dimensionless gains<br />
in the transfer functions. The gains with engineering units should be divided by<br />
the appropriate transmitter spans and multiplied by the appropriate valve gains.<br />
Typical transmitter spans are 100”F, 50 gpm, 250 psig, 2 mol % benzene, and the<br />
like. Typical valve gains are perhaps twice the normal steadystate flow rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manipulated variable. The slope <strong>of</strong> the installed characteristics <strong>of</strong> the control<br />
valve at the steadystate operating conditions should be used. Thus the gains that<br />
should be used are those that the control system will see. It gets inputs in mA or<br />
psig from transmitters and puts out mA or psig to valves or to flow controller<br />
setpoints.<br />
16.3 INTERACTION<br />
Interaction among control loops in a multivariable system has been the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
much research over the last 20 years. Various types <strong>of</strong> decouplcrs were explored<br />
to separate the loops. Rosenbrock presented the inverse Nyquist array (INA) to<br />
quantify the amount <strong>of</strong> interaction. Bristol, Shinskey, and McAvoy developed the<br />
relative gain array (RGA) as an index <strong>of</strong> loop interaction.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> this work was based on the premise that interaction was undesirable.<br />
This is true <strong>for</strong> setpoint disturbances. One would like to be able to change a<br />
setpoint in one loop without affecting the other loops. And if the loops do not<br />
interact, each individual loop can be tuned by itself and the whole system should<br />
be stable if each individual loop is stable.<br />
Un<strong>for</strong>tunately much <strong>of</strong> this interaction analysis work has clouded the issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> how to design an effective control system <strong>for</strong> a multivariable process. In most<br />
process control applications the problem is not setpoint responses but load<br />
responses. We want a system that holds the process at the desired values in the<br />
face <strong>of</strong> load disturbances. Interaction is there<strong>for</strong>e not necessarily bad, and in fact<br />
in some systems it helps in rejecting the effects <strong>of</strong> load disturbances. Niederlinski<br />
(AZChE J 1971, Vol. 17, p. 1261) showed in an early paper that the use <strong>of</strong> decouplers<br />
made the load rejection worse.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e the discussions <strong>of</strong> the RGA, INA, and decoupling techniques will<br />
be quite brief. I include them, not because they are all that useful, but because<br />
they are part <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> multivariable control. You should be aware <strong>of</strong><br />
what they are and <strong>of</strong> their limitations.