here - Stefan-Marr.de

8. Evaluation: Performance
Runtime, normalized to mean of
RoarVM+OMOP (opt), lower is better
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
AmbientTalkST
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
LRSTM
Array Access
Class Var Binding
FloatLoop
Instance Var.
Int Loop
Sends
Local Sends
with 10 arguments
Local Sends
Runtime, normalized to mean of
RoarVM+OMOP (opt), lower is better
Remote Sends
Remote Sends
with 10 arguments
Array Access
Class Var Binding
FloatLoop
Instance Var.
Int Loop
Sends
Sends
with 10 arguments
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
AmbientTalkST
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
LRSTM
Binary Trees
Fannkuch
Fasta
NBody
Binary Trees
Fannkuch
Fasta
NBody
Figure 8.11.: Absolute Performance, CogVM and AST-OMOP vs. RoarVM+OMOP
(opt), logarithmic scale: Although, the CogVM is 11.0x faster than the RoarVM
(opt), the microbenchmarks indicate a significantly smaller difference. While
most of them remain faster, the Int and Float Loop benchmarks show significant
slowdowns. They are up to 2x slower on the CogVM with AST-OMOP than
on the RoarVM+OMOP (opt). The kernel benchmarks maintain their higher absolute
performance on CogVM with AST-OMOP and execute 5.7x faster than
on the RoarVM+OMOP (opt). The AmbientTalkST NBody benchmarks shows a
minor slowdown of 21%. The AmbientTalkST Fannkuch benchmark on the other
hand is about 14.3x faster.
228