02.09.2014 Views

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There are a number of first and second priority policies and regulations that could be used to<br />

support an EPR program.<br />

First priority policies and regulations are those that have readily measurable outcomes<br />

within shorter term timelines and are built on clear and existing regulatory authority and<br />

policy precedent.<br />

Second priority measures are generally less quantifiable in nature are less prescriptive<br />

and are longer term in their vision. They are also priorities in which legislative and policy<br />

experience is less strong. .<br />

First Priority Policies and Regulations<br />

Restrictions on Toxic Substances<br />

Restrictions on substances used in products can support an EPR program by minimizing or<br />

eliminating risks to the environment and/or human health and by making it easier and less<br />

expensive to recycle at the end of life. The removal, separation and management of toxic and<br />

hazardous substances and components in products during the recycling process can be eased or<br />

eliminated completely if the producer has redesigned the product to reduce or eliminate such<br />

substances in response to a regulation.<br />

The Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) 1999 provides the authority to assess and<br />

manage risks to the environment and human health, to sustainably prevent pollution and to<br />

address potentially dangerous exposure to chemical substances. Under this legislation the<br />

Ministers of the Environment and Health control chemical substances using a variety of tools<br />

ranging from providing in<strong>for</strong>mation about proper use to regulations that restrict or ban use. For<br />

example, it is anticipated that Environment <strong>Canada</strong> will publish proposed regulations by winter<br />

2009/10 to prohibit or restrict mercury in products by 2012.<br />

Federal authority under CEPA also exists to mandate the preparation of pollution prevention<br />

plans through the issuance of Pollution Prevention <strong>Plan</strong>ning Notices. For example, a P2 Notice<br />

has been used as a mechanism to manage mercury switches. Affected parties, vehicle<br />

manufacturers and steel mills, must participate in a national switch management program <strong>for</strong> 15<br />

years after mercury switches were last installed in their vehicles.<br />

Environmental Per<strong>for</strong>mance Agreements<br />

An environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance agreement consists of core criteria negotiated among parties to<br />

achieve specified environmental results. It can be signed between a government and a single<br />

company, multiple companies, regional industry associations, an industry sector association or a<br />

number of sector associations. Such an agreement would commit signatories to specific<br />

challenges or per<strong>for</strong>mance levels and is possible when the parties involved share common<br />

objectives and each can derive benefits from addressing a particular environmental issue. On<br />

industry’s part, interest may stem from the increased flexibility an agreement may allow in<br />

achieving an environmental objective and increased certainty that such an agreement can<br />

provide.<br />

Approved in principle by <strong>CCME</strong> Council of Ministers October 29, 2009 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!