02.09.2014 Views

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

Canada-Wide Action Plan for Extended Producer ... - CCME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Targets should also be established <strong>for</strong> reuse and refurbishment and appropriate metrics <strong>for</strong><br />

measurement developed.<br />

Design <strong>for</strong> Environment<br />

The objective of the design process is to produce a product that is least damaging to the<br />

environment while balancing other relevant considerations, such as function, technical<br />

requirements, quality, per<strong>for</strong>mance and safety.<br />

<strong>Producer</strong>s and PROs should undertake research and implement environmental design<br />

improvements <strong>for</strong> products collected and managed by the EPR program.<br />

Environmental design improvements could include such things as:<br />

• Elimination and reduction of toxic substances as defined by the Canadian Environmental<br />

Protection Act, 1999 and by Environment <strong>Canada</strong>’s Chemicals Management <strong>Plan</strong><br />

• The reduction in the use of substances of concern<br />

• Design <strong>for</strong> product disassembly<br />

• Design <strong>for</strong> product recyclability<br />

• Use of recycled materials<br />

• Ease of repair and refurbishment<br />

• Reduced energy consumption during both use and stand by<br />

Jurisdictions should consider requiring producers to report on progress towards improved<br />

environmental design as part of their regular reporting.<br />

Fees<br />

Any fees associated with the program and product management should be directly linked to and<br />

reflect actual costs associated with the program objectives and mandate.<br />

Taxing authority is limited to Crown authorities and agencies.<br />

Costs associated with an EPR program should be internalized as a factor of production and be<br />

incorporated into market price of the product – i.e., the costs <strong>for</strong> end-of-life management of<br />

products should be treated similarly to other factors of production (such as manufacturing,<br />

distribution, marketing and sales) and incorporated into wholesale and retail product prices.<br />

Jurisdictions may or may not choose to regulate the visibility or non-visibility of such fees at the<br />

point of consumer purchase.<br />

There should be no cross-subsidization of program costs between products. In the case of multiproduct<br />

programs, “common costs” (e.g. compliance, administration, program start up) should be<br />

allocated among products in a way that reflects each product’s share of the overall waste<br />

generation.<br />

Programs should be structured to ensure fees to manage products reflect the actual costs of the<br />

end-of-life management of that product and are designed to provide incentives <strong>for</strong> improved<br />

environmental product design and per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Approved in principle by <strong>CCME</strong> Council of Ministers October 29, 2009 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!