11.09.2014 Views

Chairside Magazine Volume 2, Issue 1 - Glidewell Dental Labs

Chairside Magazine Volume 2, Issue 1 - Glidewell Dental Labs

Chairside Magazine Volume 2, Issue 1 - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Q12: So you’re going to be giving an infraorbital and a nasopalatine<br />

if you are doing crowns from second bicuspid to second<br />

bicuspid? As opposed to giving 8 infiltrations over those teeth?<br />

AB: Yes. I want blocks. As a rule of thumb a block will give<br />

you twice as long a duration of anesthesia as an infiltration.<br />

That’ll depend a little bit on your anesthetic and other<br />

variables. But if you want hemostasis, if you’re gong to be<br />

doing root planing or surgery or subgingival preps, anything<br />

where you know you’ll be getting some bleeding, I will do<br />

local infiltration using ideally Lidocaine with 1 to 50,000<br />

epinephrine. That one little infiltration will give me a great<br />

deal of hemostasis in a localized site. If I use 1 to 50,000, for<br />

an I.A. block, my anesthesia will be about the same duration<br />

as 1 to 100,000 but it won’t give me good hemostasis. So for<br />

blocks, I want to use as low a concentration of vasoconstrictor<br />

as I can. For example, Septocaine now has the 1 to 200,000<br />

epi solution available and there are a number of studies<br />

now, which are all quite similar, that there is no significant<br />

difference in duration. It’s a little bit shorter duration with<br />

1 to 200,000 than 1 to 100,000, but clinically it’s not really<br />

significant. So why not use the safest one with the lowest<br />

concentration? But if I am going to use it for hemostasis as a<br />

local infiltration, I am going to use the highest one I can get<br />

my hands on.<br />

Q13: I have to tell you that I don’t know any of my friends who<br />

are giving infraorbital injections with a nasopalatine for anterior<br />

crowns like that, I think most of them are still giving 8 infiltrations.<br />

Do you think there are a lot of GP’s using your technique?<br />

AB: No<br />

14: Can you explain to me how exactly you do it? Or do you even<br />

recommend that the average GP does this?<br />

AB: Absolutely, I have no hesitation. So what you do is feel<br />

the lower rim of the orbit. You feel for the lowest part of the<br />

rim, but it’s not right in the center. It is actually more towards<br />

the base of the nose. Drop your finger down 1cm below that<br />

rim and your finger is right over the foramen. And with many<br />

people, if they’re a little bit thin there, you can press and they<br />

can feel a little bit of nerve tingling. So you are right over<br />

the foramen. Keep one fingertip there and I take my other<br />

fingertip, usually my thumb and slide it up into the top of the<br />

maxillary vestibule in the area of the cuspid to bicuspid. That<br />

distance between those two fingertips is going to be the depth<br />

of my penetration of the needle.<br />

Q15: I am doing it on myself as you talk, and it doesn’t feel very<br />

deep. It feels like a quarter inch or a half-inch to me.<br />

AB: Yeah, for most people it’s less than 10mm, less than a<br />

centimeter. So it’s not a big deal. So then I’m going to insert<br />

a needle up into the top of the vestibule paralleling the slope<br />

of the maxillary bone there until I feel that needle right up<br />

underneath my fingertip that’s outside over the foramen.<br />

Q16: So where’s the puncture point in relation to the crowns on<br />

the teeth?<br />

AB: I’m coming in really more over the bicuspids. I use a little<br />

more posterior approach because it’s more comfortable, you<br />

know, away from the midline. The technique I was taught in<br />

school you came in over the lateral to cuspids and that brought<br />

you in close to the base of the nose and patients always feel<br />

that, so you go further posterior and it’s not as sensitive. I’m<br />

coming into the vestibule over the bicuspids and paralleling<br />

the bone until my needle is in about a centimeter so it’s right<br />

up underneath my fingertip. I stop, aspirate, drop my bolus of<br />

anesthetic and then with that same finger that’s been outside<br />

the mouth the whole time, I just massage the bolus into the<br />

foramen. I give the injection with the patient lying down and<br />

I keep the patient lying down. Then that anesthetic is either<br />

going to dissipate into the soft tissue or it’s going to flow<br />

down into that foramen.<br />

Q17: How often do you get a positive aspiration on that infraorbital<br />

injection?<br />

AB: Not very often. There are little blood vessels there but<br />

they’re small enough to be of little consequence. And I give it<br />

slowly. I give all my injections very slowly. To me it’s all about<br />

patient comfort, but it’s also about safety. If I see any blanching<br />

there, I’m giving it too fast. I shouldn’t see that.<br />

Q18: So when you successfully give the infraorbital block, what<br />

gets anesthetized?<br />

AB: It’ll anesthetize the lip, the buccal soft tissue, and the<br />

pulps of the anterior teeth cuspid to central. It won’t get<br />

palatal soft tissues and it may or may not get the pulps of the<br />

bicuspids. So I may have to infiltrate over the bicuspids in<br />

some cases, maybe 25% of the time.<br />

Q19: Do you think it’s safe to say that in dental school fifty years<br />

from now or in general practices fifty years from now that the<br />

Gow-Gates might be the routine and the IA blocks kind of the<br />

thing of the past?<br />

AB: It could be, but I honestly don’t think of it in those<br />

terms, Mike, because to me, I want to know as many tricks<br />

as possible, if “tricks” is the right word. No two people are<br />

put together the same and there are always these oddball<br />

situations where it helps to know different techniques. The<br />

conventional IA technique has been around since the 1880’s,<br />

it’s got a good track record. You know, I started using the<br />

Gow-Gates initially because when my regular lower block<br />

didn’t work I wanted a back up technique. And the Gow-Gates<br />

technique usually worked. Then I started reading about it and<br />

I was seeing the higher success rates in the literature and I<br />

thought, if this is so successful, then why don’t I do this all<br />

the time and use the other one, the conventional technique,<br />

just when I need to for an alternative. And so now I almost<br />

exclusively use the Gow-Gates. But I think it’s good to know<br />

all the techniques. That’s my opinion.<br />

And another troubleshooting tip is that, I advocate caution<br />

giving additional inferior alveolar injections if the first one<br />

doesn’t work. If I give an inferior alveolar nerve block conventional<br />

technique, I was taught if you didn’t get it the first time,<br />

to go a little higher and little deeper the second time, and, you<br />

know, it usually worked.<br />

Q20: By higher, by deeper, do you mean to the hub or do you<br />

mean medially versus laterally? What do you mean by deeper?<br />

AB: Well, that’s a great question because you are never quite<br />

sure what people are referring to when they say that’s what<br />

they do. By going a little bit higher I’m talking about a quarter<br />

of an inch at the most higher up on my thumbnail at the<br />

anterior border of the mandible. As far as deeper, what I’m<br />

referring to is a slightly more posterior injection site, not necessarily<br />

going in deeper with the needle because the bone<br />

should still be in the same place, so it’s just that my injection<br />

site is slightly more posterior than my initial one.<br />

But what I’ve found reading the literature is that that higher<br />

and deeper technique also led to increased incidents of positive<br />

aspirations. I don’t really want to be more successful with<br />

anesthesia at the risk of causing more bleeding. And that again<br />

is what led me to look more closely at the Gow-Gates.<br />

I didn’t start out using the Gow-Gates, I started out using<br />

it only for back up and the more I used it the more I got<br />

comfortable with it. Everything points to it being safer, being<br />

more effective, being more efficient, and that’s why I’m a big<br />

believer in it now.<br />

Michael DiTolla: I’ve learned some great stuff today and if we<br />

just inspire one or two people to take a look at their local anesthetic<br />

procedures, and they can add a new technique that will<br />

keep a patient comfortable while they are having dentistry done,<br />

I think we’ve done our job. I look forward to taking<br />

your cadaver course at the CDA meeting,<br />

and thank you so much<br />

for your time today.<br />

AB: My pleasure<br />

Mike,<br />

I enjoyed talking<br />

with you.<br />

20 Questions with Dr. Alan Budenz

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!