21.09.2014 Views

ISLAM

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 <strong>ISLAM</strong> VERSUS CHRISTIANITY<br />

father-in-law of the Prophet. But the object was a<br />

far nobler one the protection of the widows of his<br />

friends. In polygamy alone lay the moral safety of<br />

the Muslim society situated as it then was.<br />

Again, certain political reasons also led to some of<br />

the marriages. This was the case in the marriage<br />

with Javairiyyah, a lady belonging to the Bani<br />

Mustalaq and such was also the case in the marriage<br />

with Safiyyah, the widow of a Jewish chieftain. The<br />

Prophet wanted to conciliate both tribes.<br />

We now come to the fourth period. With the<br />

conquest of Mecca in the year 8. A. H. internal warfare<br />

came practically to an end. Disturbances there were,<br />

but on the whole peace had been established in the<br />

country and normal conditions were resorted. And<br />

it is from the 8th year of the flight to the end of his<br />

life that we find that the prophet did not contract any<br />

new marriage. What is the evidence of facts then ?<br />

It is clearly this that the Holy Prophet added to the<br />

number of his wives only during the time that he<br />

had to live in a state of warfare, when the number of<br />

males<br />

was reduced so that many women would have<br />

been left without protection and without a home if<br />

the difficulty had not been solved by permitting a<br />

limited polygamy. Before the Prophet had to enter<br />

on a defensive warfare, he lived in the company of a<br />

single wife, and after war was ended, he contracted no<br />

new marriage, and this sets all doubts at rest as to the<br />

motive of the Prophet. In all the marriages which<br />

he contracted during the War, there was some ulterior

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!