27.09.2014 Views

GM FORECASTS RADICAL CHANGE - The Founder

GM FORECASTS RADICAL CHANGE - The Founder

GM FORECASTS RADICAL CHANGE - The Founder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MILLER & BENSON © BOB GROVES<br />

EDITORIAL & OPINION Monday 29 January 2007 thefounder<br />

& Opinion<br />

thefounder<br />

john@thefounder.co.uk<br />

Editorial<br />

POLITICS AMANDA FARRY<br />

Does the ‘Green<br />

Bush’ blossom?<br />

In the ‘State of the Union’ speech given by George Bush last week,<br />

some environmental issues were addressed... Does this constitute<br />

a change in American environment policy or were the statements<br />

made purely for the benefit of the popularity polls?<br />

<strong>The</strong> announcement last week from George Bush of a number of ‘environmentally<br />

friendly’ initiatives has caused quite a stir in the media. But what<br />

are the motives behind Bush’s announcements? Political popularity boost<br />

or can we really believe it’s for the greener good?<br />

In last week’s speech, Bush mentioned plans to reduce the US’s petrol<br />

consumption by 20% in the next 10 years, perhaps quite an ambitious target<br />

for the US, but nevertheless a step in the right direction. Bush’s other<br />

plans included more money, £808 million to be exact, to be spent over the<br />

next 10 years on research and development of renewable energy sources.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se figures did indeed provide a certain amount of hope for the optimists<br />

among us, but on closer inspection there are some cracks in Bush’s<br />

ideas.<br />

For instance Bush at one point says that ‘we must also step up domestic<br />

oil production in environmentally sensitive ways; perhaps a slightly<br />

contradictory statement? In order to rapidly increase any oil production<br />

without causing some harm to the environment is currently an unrealistic<br />

prospect. But this statement may have an underlying meaning; is it hinting<br />

that oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), currently<br />

fiercely debated among American conservationists, will go ahead<br />

in an ‘environmentally sensitive’ way? Or was this statement intended to<br />

reiterate Bush’s later comment; that the country is too dependent on the<br />

turbulent Middle East for their oil?<br />

After reading the entire ‘environmental’ sections of Bush’s speech, there<br />

appears to be an absence of hard policies and commitment to these issues.<br />

<strong>The</strong> biggest issue, carbon emissions, is not mentioned and even those that<br />

have are somewhat ‘glazed’. However, there may be some light at the end of<br />

the tunnel for American green policy: the technology route. Who said the<br />

Americans have to follow the direction preferred by many other nations<br />

of the world? George Bush’s ‘Technology not treaties’ approach to climate<br />

change may be the way forward. After all, technology got us into this mess,<br />

so why can’t it get us out? So perhaps the money spent on research and<br />

development may reap some benefits after all; only time will tell.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bottom line is that after taking an overview of Mr Bush’s speech, the<br />

conclusion we all expected still prevailed: the environment has not moved<br />

up the agenda, but has merely been used to create political hype, possibly<br />

as an attempt to boost Bush’s diminishing popularity with the American<br />

people. <strong>The</strong>re is however one positive outcome, albeit a selfish or unselfish<br />

motive, Bush has finally brought the environment some form of hope.<br />

For the full State of the Union address go to the BBC website: http://<br />

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3415361.stm<br />

Recycle!<br />

Recycle!<br />

Recycle!<br />

Bins located just outside <strong>The</strong> Hub<br />

(next to ‘Lake Medicine’)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!