10.10.2014 Views

Question Q194 National Group: United Kingdom Title: The ... - AIPPI

Question Q194 National Group: United Kingdom Title: The ... - AIPPI

Question Q194 National Group: United Kingdom Title: The ... - AIPPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

jurisdictions that utilise a hybrid system which mixes roman, civil and common law<br />

principles.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

<strong>The</strong> laws of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> do not give rise to different types of co-ownership of<br />

IPRs dependant upon the origin of the co-ownership. Regardless of the genesis of<br />

the work that is co-owned, there are two different types of co-ownership, namely<br />

either as ‘tenants in common’ or as a ‘joint tenants,’ which affects the nature of<br />

survivorship rights. <strong>The</strong> UK also permits ownership of equitable and legal titles, held<br />

by different persons.<br />

Co-ownership is commonly regulated by contract, and freedom of contract makes<br />

almost any arrangement permissible. <strong>The</strong> rights of co-owners to work inventions and<br />

licence rights do vary based upon the IPR in question and the relevant governing<br />

statutory regime. In general co-owners must agree to licence and sub-contract the<br />

IPR and may not act unilaterally, although they may seek a decision of the Court to<br />

determine a dispute between themselves.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interface between competition and IPRs is complex, and the law is greatly<br />

influenced by EU law. <strong>The</strong> UK seeks to balance the public policy between the<br />

individual right and the public interest, e.g. it is possible to request a compulsory<br />

licence to ensure patents are worked.<br />

In general, the UK group believes that a co-owner should be subject to restrictions on<br />

freedom to deal with a co-owned IPR; otherwise the value of that right may diminish.<br />

Where co-owners are in different jurisdictions and disputes arise, the UK Courts<br />

determine ownership by reference to the relevant foreign law or laws based on the<br />

location of creation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> group supports moves towards harmonising these issues, because differences<br />

in national laws can defeat the expectations of owners who structure their<br />

relationship with co-owners based on their own national law. <strong>The</strong> harmonization of<br />

each IPR should be considered in turn, and we would recommend that process be<br />

commenced with patents.<br />

RESUME<br />

Les lois du Royaume-Uni ne permettent pas différents types de copropriété des<br />

droits de propriété intellectuelle selon l'origine de la copropriété. Quelque soit la<br />

genèse du travail qui est en copropriété, il y a deux différents types de copropriété,<br />

soit "conjointe", soit "solidaire",’ ce qui affecte la nature des droits du survivant. Le<br />

Royaume-Uni permet aussi que la propriété sur la valeur et les titres de propriété soit<br />

détenue par différentes personnes.<br />

La copropriété est habituellement gouvernée par les contrats, et la liberté<br />

contractuelle rend presque tout arrangement possible. Les droits des copropriétaires<br />

d'exploiter et de concéder les droits varient selon le droit de propriété intellectuelle en<br />

question et le régime légal applicable. En général les copropriétaires s'accordent<br />

pour concéder et sous-contracter les droits de propriété intellectuelle et ne peuvent<br />

agir de manière unilatérale, bien qu'ils puissent requérir une décision du tribunal pour<br />

régler un conflit entre eux.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!