1 On tough-movement* Milan Rezac, University ... - Multimania.co.uk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Miller, P. H. and Sag, I. A. 1997. "French clitic movement without clitics or movement." Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15:573–639. Montalbetti, M. 1984. After binding. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Moro, A. 1997. The raising of predicates. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nakamura, M. 1997. "Object extraction in Bantu applicatives: Some implications for minimalism." Linguistic Inquiry 28:252-280. Nanni, D. L. 1978. The easy class of adjectives in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. Nanni, D. L. 1980. "On the surface syntax of constructions with easy-type adjectives." Language 56:568-581. Nissenbaum, J. 2001. Investigations of covert phrasal movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A. and Wasow, T. 1994. "Idioms." Language 70:491-538. Oehrle, R. T. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Ouhalla, J. 1993. "Subject extraction, negation, and the anti-agreement effect." Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11:477-518. Pesetsky, D. 1982. Paths and categories. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. 2001. "Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez." Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19:583-646. Postal, P. M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Postal, P. M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Postal, P. M. 1997. Strong cross-over violations and binding principles. Paper presented at ESCOL 1997, Yale University, November 1997. Ms., New York University. Available at: http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/lingu/people/faculty/postal/papers/crossovr.rtf. Postal, P. M. 1998. Three investigations of extraction. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass. Postal, P. M. 2004. Skeptical linguistic essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Postal, P. M. and Ross, J. R. 1971. "¡Tough movement Si, tough deletion No!" Linguistic Inquiry 2:544–546. Potsdam, E. and Runner, J. T. 2001. "Richard returns: Copy-raising and its implications." In Papers from the 37 th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston and S. Neuvel (eds), 206-222. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Reinhart, T. 2000. "Strategies of anaphora resolution." In Interface strategies, H. Bennis, M. Everaert and E. Reuland (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences. Rezac, M. 2003. "The fine structure of cyclic Agree." Syntax 6:156-182. Rezac, M. 2004a. Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and Merge. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Rezac, M. 2004b. Agree and Merge. Ms., University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000041. Richards, N. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Rizzi, L. 1986. "Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro." Linguistic Inquiry 17:501-557. Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Rizzi, L. 1997. "The fine structure of the left periphery." In Elements of grammar, L. Haegeman (ed), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 4
Rizzi, L. Forthcoming. "On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects." In Whmovement on the Move, L. L.-S. Cheng and N. Corver (eds). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Romero, M. 1997. Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. Rosenbaum, P. S. 1965. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Rullmann, H. and Beck, S. 1998. "Reconstruction and the interpretation of which-phrases." In Proceedings of the Tübingen Workshop on Reconstruction [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, #127], G. Katz, S.-S. Kim and H. Winhart (eds), 223-256. University of Tübingen and Stuttgart. Sauerland, U. 1998. The meaning of chains. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Sauerland, U. 2004. "The interpretation of traces." Natural Language Semantics 12:63-127. Schachter, P. 1981. "Lovely to look at." Linguistic Analysis 8:431-448. Shlonsky, U. 1992. "Resumptive pronouns as last resort." Linguistic Inquiry 32:443-468. Svenonius, P. 2000. "Quantifier movement in Icelandic." In The derivation of VO and OV, P. Svenonius (ed), 255-292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Svenonius, P. 2004. "On the edge." In Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, D. Adger, C. de Cat and G. Tsoulas (eds), 259-287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Tellier, C. 2001. "On some distinctive properties of French parasitic gaps." In Parasitic gaps, P. W. Culicover and P. M. Postal (eds), 341-369. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Terence Langendoen, D., Kalish-Landon, N. and Dore, J. 1973. "Dative questions: A study in the relation of acceptability to grammaticality of an English sentence type." Cognition 4:451- 478. Uriagereka, J. 2000. In defense of Deep Structure. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park. Watanabe, A. 2000. "Feature copying and binding: Evidence from complementizer agreement and switch reference." Syntax 3:159-181. Wilder, C. 1991. "Tough-movement constructions." Linguistische Berichte 132:115-132. Williams, E. 1980. "Predication." Linguistic Inquiry 11:203-238. Williams, E. 1983. "Syntactic vs. semantic categories." Linguistics and Philosophy 6:423-446. Wurmbrand, S. 2001. Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 5
Page 1 and 2: On tough-movement * Milan Rezac, Un
Page 3 and 4: that it involves an Ā-step between
Page 5 and 6: d. *John is easy that anyone likes
Page 7 and 8: Adopting the copy theory for traces
Page 9 and 10: In tough-movement, the TM subject i
Page 11 and 12: (28) *There were asked what things
Page 13 and 14: . =No person is such that it seems
Page 15 and 16: constructions, all accounts share t
Page 17 and 18: the top of the OP clause. Various q
Page 19 and 20: not find an active wh-phrase as a g
Page 21 and 22: The pattern of goodness and degrada
Page 23 and 24: Although there is reason to be caut
Page 25 and 26: makes them available to external φ
Page 27 and 28: 14 It is an open question whether O
Page 29 and 30: References Abeillé, A., Goddard, D
Page 31: Kaplan, R. M. and Bresnan, J. 1982.
Page 35: TABLE 1: Properties of "On wh-movem

1 On tough-movement* Milan Rezac, University ... - Multimania.co.uk

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?