19.10.2014 Views

Download Publication - Rio+20

Download Publication - Rio+20

Download Publication - Rio+20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

GREEN ECONOMY<br />

Challenges and<br />

opportunities<br />

International<br />

perspectives of the<br />

transition to a<br />

low-carbon green<br />

economy<br />

Eduardo Viola<br />

These 13 countries (considering the European Union as one unit) are<br />

responsible for over 80% of global emissions and constitute the two crucial<br />

groups of great and medium powers. The great powers share three highly<br />

relevant characteristics: the first and essential, each one is responsible for<br />

a high proportion of global carbon emissions (at least 15%) and of global<br />

GDP; secondly, they possess important technological and human capital for<br />

decarbonizing the economy; and thirdly, they have veto power over any global<br />

international agreement that is effective. The medium powers are of limited<br />

relevance in terms of their participation in emissions and the global economy and<br />

none of them alone has veto capabilities over a global international agreement.<br />

There are three great powers – the US, China and the European Union –<br />

that stand for 54% of global GDP and 58% of global carbon emissions. The<br />

European Union is isolated in the defense of an effective global architecture for<br />

a rapid transition to a low-carbon economy. The US and China resist a global<br />

agreement on a transition to low-carbon. There are ten medium powers: India,<br />

Russia, Brazil, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Canada, South Africa, South Korea<br />

and Saudi Arabia.<br />

The severity of the 2008 economic crisis opened a limited window of<br />

opportunity for a partial transformation of values in developed and emerging<br />

countries in the direction of a diminished importance attributed to immediatism,<br />

which favors the perception of the gravity of the climate issue. Since the<br />

economic crisis is systemic, the recuperation process currently on course does<br />

not imply the return to a situation similar to that existing prior to September 2008.<br />

As opposed to what the majority of international economists and analysts had<br />

imagined in mid-2008, a substantial part of the economic stimulus packages<br />

initiated in November 2008 in various key countries propelled the transition to<br />

a low-carbon economy: 65% of the increased spending in South Korea, 35%<br />

in China, 20% in the United Kingdom, 20% in Germany and 15% in the United<br />

States (Stern, 2009). Brazil, India, South Africa, Indonesia and Russia had very<br />

poor progress in this case.<br />

This article is organized in four parts. In the first, the current situation and<br />

main policies of the great and medium powers in the transition to a low carbon<br />

green economy will be analyzed. In the second part, the specific situation of<br />

South America in this transition will be summarized. In the third part, the main<br />

techno-economic vectors in the transition to a low carbon green economy will<br />

be described. Finally, the fourth part contains a reflection on future perspectives<br />

of the transition on a global level.<br />

Nº 8 • June 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!