20.10.2014 Views

Energy Subsidies: Lessons Learned in Assessing their Impact - UNEP

Energy Subsidies: Lessons Learned in Assessing their Impact - UNEP

Energy Subsidies: Lessons Learned in Assessing their Impact - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Subsidies</strong>: <strong>Lessons</strong> <strong>Learned</strong> <strong>in</strong> Assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>their</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> and Design<strong>in</strong>g Policy Reforms<br />

A2.3 Natural Resource Depletion<br />

Assess<strong>in</strong>g the value of depletion of fossil-fuel resources requires an approach based on capital<br />

stocks, as changes <strong>in</strong> the stock of capital available for future use affect its potential for<br />

generat<strong>in</strong>g welfare for future generations. Valu<strong>in</strong>g the future welfare change simply by<br />

multiply<strong>in</strong>g the market price of the resource by the volume sold <strong>in</strong> the last period does not<br />

yield the true cost of over-depletion due to subsidies <strong>in</strong> terms of loss of welfare. Apply<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

approach <strong>in</strong> this manner does not give an <strong>in</strong>dication of whether the revenue has been used to<br />

fund <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> alternative capital stocks for generat<strong>in</strong>g future welfare (susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

<strong>in</strong>come) or whether it has simply been spent on current consumption. So, appropriate<br />

methodologies must assess how much current production results <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>in</strong>come. A<br />

number of studies have been carried out <strong>in</strong> this area, though none of them specifically address<br />

the issue of energy-subsidy reform. 122 The effects of government policies on natural resource<br />

stocks are usually assessed <strong>in</strong> physical units, such as tonnes per year or the proportion of total<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g proven reserves.<br />

A3<br />

Assess<strong>in</strong>g Social Effects<br />

The assessment of the social effects of energy-subsidy reform must address two pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />

concerns:<br />

Firstly, how different social groups are affected by changes <strong>in</strong> energy prices. Changes <strong>in</strong> real<br />

<strong>in</strong>come distribution result both from changes <strong>in</strong> the pattern of economic activity and changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> environmental conditions. The former is generally more significant.<br />

An understand<strong>in</strong>g of the w<strong>in</strong>ners and losers from subsidy reform is essential to a full<br />

assessment of the potential welfare benefits.<br />

Secondly, how subsidy reform affects peoples’ access to and use of different types of energy<br />

and consequently <strong>their</strong> health and well be<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong> turn affects <strong>their</strong> comfort levels and<br />

<strong>their</strong> ability to generate <strong>in</strong>come. For example, a shift of <strong>in</strong>dustrial subsidies to those that<br />

promote rural electrification can have a major impact on livelihoods and poverty alleviation<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas.<br />

The relevance of the two sets of concerns will also differ considerably between developed and<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, with the latter be<strong>in</strong>g much more <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> the second set of issues.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> this category the results will also depend critically on the types of fuels used as well<br />

as the urban/rural distribution of population.<br />

A3.1 Measur<strong>in</strong>g Income Distribution Effects<br />

An extension of the partial and general equilibrium methodologies outl<strong>in</strong>ed above can be<br />

used to identify distributional effects. The price and quantity changes derived from<br />

equilibrium-based economic modell<strong>in</strong>g provide a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for assess<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong><br />

employment, consumption patterns and real <strong>in</strong>comes for different <strong>in</strong>come groups with<strong>in</strong><br />

society. A matrix of the distribution of ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses can be generated <strong>in</strong> this way. This<br />

122<br />

See, for example, Repetto et al. (1989) for Indonesia; Repetto and Cruz (1991) for Costa Rica; van Tongeren<br />

et al. (1993) for Mexico; Bartelmus et al. (1993) for Papua New Gu<strong>in</strong>ea; and World Bank (1997) for 103 countries<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!