- Page 1: An Updated Classification of the Re
- Page 5 and 6: SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE N
- Page 7 and 8: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We sincerely thank
- Page 9 and 10: An Updated Classification of the Re
- Page 11 and 12: did not want to attempt it. We are
- Page 13 and 14: ored to credit the person or person
- Page 15 and 16: and Boxshall (1996, lichomolgoid co
- Page 17 and 18: animal phyla.’’ For the Crustac
- Page 19 and 20: same persons to comment on the resu
- Page 21 and 22: solved (e.g., Regier and Schultz, 1
- Page 23 and 24: ancestral crustacean is of course n
- Page 25 and 26: fication (see also Negrea et al., 1
- Page 27 and 28: Bowman and Abele in not recognizing
- Page 29 and 30: (Müller and Walossek, 1985), the O
- Page 31 and 32: cerning barnacle evolution (Schram
- Page 33 and 34: parasites of early fish-like verteb
- Page 35 and 36: Boxshall and Jaume (2000, see also
- Page 37 and 38: that reduction in body segmentation
- Page 39 and 40: for a rebuttal of Dahl’s criticis
- Page 41 and 42: the Amphipoda are deserving of stat
- Page 43 and 44: er than Mysida Boas or Mysida Dana)
- Page 45 and 46: tained in our classification, altho
- Page 47 and 48: and Dalens (1999) in that we includ
- Page 49 and 50: subfamilies of the Cryptoniscidae,
- Page 51 and 52: Brusca and Brusca, 1990; Mayrat and
- Page 53 and 54:
employed recently by Pérez Farfant
- Page 55 and 56:
the former thaumastochelids being t
- Page 57 and 58:
Cunningham (1999) data, which sugge
- Page 59 and 60:
eventually led us to keep dromiids
- Page 61 and 62:
that the trichodactylids may repres
- Page 63 and 64:
(1996a-c), Rodríguez (1982, 1986,
- Page 65 and 66:
CONCLUDING REMARKS We have thorough
- Page 67 and 68:
Order Pygophora Berndt, 1907 Family
- Page 69 and 70:
Pseudocyclopiidae Sars, 1902 Pseudo
- Page 71 and 72:
Nucellicolidae Lamb, Boxshall, Mill
- Page 73 and 74:
Terrestricytheridae Schornikov, 196
- Page 75 and 76:
Eusiridae Stebbing, 1888 Exoedicero
- Page 77 and 78:
Parascelidae Bate, 1862 Platyscelid
- Page 79 and 80:
Superfamily Oniscoidea Latreille, 1
- Page 81 and 82:
Family Alpheidae Rafinesque, 1815 B
- Page 83 and 84:
Trichodactylidae Milne Edwards, 185
- Page 85 and 86:
H.-E. Gruner and L. B. Holthuis, 1-
- Page 87 and 88:
zil, ed. P. S. Young, 635-644. Rio
- Page 89 and 90:
mated from nuclear and mitochondria
- Page 91 and 92:
tacés Péracarides. Memoires de l
- Page 93 and 94:
netic reconstruction from 12S rDNA
- Page 95 and 96:
pepods and an analysis of the phylo
- Page 97 and 98:
among gammaridean families and amph
- Page 99 and 100:
es and consequences. In Proceedings
- Page 101 and 102:
tostraca) form Unguja Island (Zanzi
- Page 103 and 104:
Saint Laurent, M. de. 1979. Vers un
- Page 105 and 106:
. 1983a. Evolution of Tanaidacea. I
- Page 107 and 108:
Lysianassoidea. Journal of Natural
- Page 109 and 110:
Wills, M. A. 1997. A phylogeny of r
- Page 111 and 112:
what your sentence says. Second, ju
- Page 113 and 114:
logeny and taxonomy. This focus on
- Page 115 and 116:
Submitted by Roger L. Kaesler, Pale
- Page 117 and 118:
Bousfield, E. L. 1996. A contributi
- Page 119 and 120:
knowledge on the phylogeny and the
- Page 121 and 122:
inoidea is difficult, because they
- Page 123 and 124:
APPENDIX III. OTHER CRUSTACEAN RESO
- Page 125 and 126:
(The) Stomatopod Newsletter Editors
- Page 127 and 128:
links to crustacean societies, cons
- Page 129 and 130:
(The) Lurker’s Guide to Stomatopo
- Page 131 and 132:
strategies, and phylogeny, especial
Change language