24.10.2014 Views

An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea

An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea

An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In <strong>the</strong> superfamily Aselloidea, <strong>the</strong> family Atlantasellidae<br />

has been removed. Brusca and Wilson<br />

(1991) suggested its removal to <strong>the</strong> Microcerberoidea,<br />

where we have placed it. Although Roman and<br />

Dalens (1999) treat <strong>the</strong> family Microcerberidae as<br />

a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Aselloidea, we are keeping it in its<br />

own suborder (Microcerberidea) and superfamily<br />

(Microcerberoidea) as per Bowman and Abele<br />

(1982) (as noted earlier). Thus, <strong>the</strong> Aselloidea presently<br />

contains only <strong>the</strong> Asellidae and Stenasellidae.<br />

The superfamily Stenetrioidea now contains <strong>the</strong><br />

Pseudojaniridae (as noted above), although Roman<br />

and Dalens (1999) have kept it at one family, <strong>the</strong><br />

Stenetriidae.<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> enormous superfamily Janiroidea, <strong>the</strong><br />

Abyssianiridae was removed (incorporated into <strong>the</strong><br />

Paramunnidae) following Just (1990). Species formerly<br />

within that family are now considered to belong<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Paramunnidae. The former families Eurycopidae,<br />

Ilyarachnidae, and Munnopsididae are<br />

now considered subfamilies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Munnopsididae<br />

(Wilson, 1989). The Microparasellidae is apparently<br />

polyphyletic; ‘‘some taxa may be moved to <strong>the</strong><br />

Vermectiadidae or put in a new family; Microparasellus<br />

will stay in <strong>the</strong> Janiroidea’’ (Wilson, pers.<br />

comm.). The Janiridae was shown to be nonmonophyletic<br />

by Wilson (1994) but remains a valid<br />

family; some <strong>of</strong> its genera will eventually be reassigned<br />

to o<strong>the</strong>r families. The Katianiridae was described<br />

by Svavarsson (1987). Although <strong>the</strong> family<br />

Pleurogoniidae is recognized by some workers (e.g.,<br />

Roman and Dalens, 1999), we have removed it at<br />

<strong>the</strong> suggestion that it is a junior synonym <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Paramunnidae (G. Poore, pers. comm.; G. Wilson,<br />

pers. comm.). The family Pseudomesidae was sunk<br />

into <strong>the</strong> Desmosomatidae by Svavarsson (1984).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> family Santiidae is credited to Kussakin<br />

(1988) by many workers (e.g., Wolff, 1989),<br />

it was first used (in a figure) by Wilson (1987). In<br />

Wilson’s (1987) paper, he acknowledges Fresi et al.<br />

(1980) as <strong>the</strong> source for one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phylogenetic<br />

trees in that paper (Wilson’s fig. 5B). However, Fresi<br />

et al. (1980) did not include <strong>the</strong> Santiidae in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

figure; it was apparently added (and <strong>the</strong>refore first<br />

used) by Wilson (1987). Thus, we have credited <strong>the</strong><br />

family Santiidae to Wilson. Cohen (1998), in his<br />

review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family Dendrotiidae, explains why<br />

this spelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family name is preferred over<br />

Dendrotionidae (used by Lincoln and Boxshall,<br />

1983). Interested workers should also consult Roman<br />

and Dalens (1999), whose list <strong>of</strong> families differs<br />

from ours in several respects.<br />

The superfamily Protallocoxoidea and family<br />

Protallocoxidae were removed per G. Wilson (pers.<br />

comm.).<br />

The superfamily Gnathostenetroidoidea contains<br />

<strong>the</strong> families Gnathostenetroididae and Protojaniridae<br />

(following Roman and Dalens, 1999). Additionally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> interesting family Vermectiadidae was<br />

described by Just and Poore (1992), and our tentative<br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vermectiadids in <strong>the</strong> superfamily<br />

Gnathostenetroidoidea is based mostly on<br />

<strong>the</strong> recommendation <strong>of</strong> R. Brusca (pers. comm.).<br />

SUBORDER CALABAZOIDA<br />

This family (Calabozoidae) and its suborder were<br />

erected by Van Lieshout (1983). Brusca and Wilson<br />

(1991) suggest that <strong>the</strong> calabazoids are oniscideans<br />

and so <strong>the</strong>y should probably be moved, but we<br />

have not done so in this classification. Wägele<br />

(pers. comm.) points out that <strong>the</strong> ending -oidea<br />

should be reserved for superfamilies and suggested<br />

that we change <strong>the</strong> spelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> suborder to Calabazoida,<br />

which we have done.<br />

SUBORDER VALVIFERA<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> Valvifera, several families have been<br />

added since <strong>the</strong> Bowman and Abele (1982) classification.<br />

The family Austrarcturellidae was described<br />

by Poore and Bardsley (1992), and <strong>the</strong> families<br />

<strong>An</strong>tarcturidae, Arcturididae, and Rectarcturidae<br />

were added by Poore (2001b). Poore (2001b)<br />

also recognized <strong>the</strong> Holidoteidae, crediting it to<br />

Wägele (1989), who first suggested it as a subfamily.<br />

Current research shows that <strong>the</strong> family Amesopodidae<br />

is probably a junior synonym <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arcturidae<br />

(G. Poore, G. Wilson, pers. comm.), and so<br />

we have removed it, although <strong>the</strong> family was listed<br />

by Roman and Dalens (1999), who did not list <strong>the</strong><br />

Austrarcturellidae. Thus, we recognize 11 families,<br />

4 more than did Bowman and Abele (1982). The<br />

family Arcturidae, credited by Bowman and Abele<br />

(1982) to Sars, is correctly credited to Dana (1849),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> family Idoteidae is correctly attributed to<br />

Samouelle (G. Poore, pers. comm.).<br />

SUBORDER EPICARIDEA<br />

Wägele (1989, pers. comm.) suggested that all <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> epicaridean families we have listed should be<br />

treated as families or subfamilies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cymothoida<br />

Leach (see above). We have not made this ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

radical change and instead have followed <strong>the</strong> more<br />

conservative classification given by Trilles (1999).<br />

Trilles (1999) divides <strong>the</strong> epicaridean families into<br />

two sections, Bopyrina and Cryptoniscina, which<br />

we have treated as superfamilies (Bopyroidea and<br />

Cryptoniscoidea) to allow a more consistent spelling<br />

and in keeping with our treatments <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

peracarid groups. In <strong>the</strong> Bopyroidea are <strong>the</strong> three<br />

families Bopyridae, Dajidae, and Entoniscidae (all<br />

<strong>of</strong> which were listed by Bowman and Abele, 1982).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> section (now superfamily) Cryptoniscoidea,<br />

Trilles (1999) treats an additional eight families not<br />

listed by Bowman and Abele (1982); <strong>the</strong> family Liriopsidae<br />

has been deleted (see arguments in Grygier<br />

and Bowman, 1990, 1991; Trilles, 1999). Thus, 11<br />

epicaridean families are recognized. The families<br />

added since Bowman and Abele (1982) are not<br />

newly described families but instead represent recognition<br />

<strong>of</strong> formerly described families that were<br />

treated in <strong>the</strong> past, at least by some authors, as<br />

40 Contributions in Science, Number 39 Rationale

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!