An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Diogenidae Ortmann, 1892 Lithodidae Samouelle, 1819 Paguridae Latreille, 1802 Parapaguridae Smith, 1882 Pylochelidae Bate, 1888 Infraorder Brachyura Latreille, 1802 Section Dromiacea de Haan, 1833 Superfamily Homolodromioidea Alcock, 1900 Family Homolodromiidae Alcock, 1900 Superfamily Dromioidea de Haan, 1833 Family Dromiidae de Haan, 1833 Dynomenidae Ortmann, 1892 Superfamily Homoloidea de Haan, 1839 Family Homolidae de Haan, 1839 Latreilliidae Stimpson, 1858 Poupiniidae Guinot, 1991 Section Eubrachyura de Saint Laurent, 1980 Subsection Raninoida de Haan, 1839 Superfamily Raninoidea de Haan, 1839 Family Raninidae de Haan, 1839 Symethidae Goeke, 1981 Superfamily Cyclodorippoidea Ortmann, 1892 Family Cyclodorippidae Ortmann, 1892 Cymonomidae Bouvier, 1897 Phyllotymolinidae Tavares, 1998 Subsection Heterotremata Guinot, 1977 Superfamily Dorippoidea MacLeay, 1838 Family Dorippidae MacLeay, 1838 Orithyiidae Dana, 1853 Superfamily Calappoidea Milne Edwards, 1837 Family Calappidae Milne Edwards, 1837 Hepatidae Stimpson, 1871 Superfamily Leucosioidea Samouelle, 1819 Family Leucosiidae Samouelle, 1819 Matutidae de Hann, 1841 Superfamily Majoidea Samouelle, 1819 Family Epialtidae MacLeay, 1838 Inachidae MacLeay, 1838 Inachoididae Dana, 1851 Majidae Samouelle, 1819 Mithracidae Balss, 1929 Pisidae Dana, 1851 Tychidae Dana, 1851 Superfamily Hymenosomatoidea MacLeay, 1838 Family Hymenosomatidae MacLeay, 1838 Superfamily Parthenopoidea MacLeay, 1838 Family Aethridae Dana, 1851 Dairidae Ng & Rodriguez, 1986 Daldorfiidae Ng & Rodriguez, 1986 Parthenopidae MacLeay, 1838 Superfamily Retroplumoidea Gill, 1894 Family Retroplumidae Gill, 1894 Superfamily Cancroidea Latreille, 1802 Family Atelecyclidae Ortmann, 1893 Cancridae Latreille, 1802 Cheiragonidae Ortmann, 1893 Corystidae Samouelle, 1819 Pirimelidae Alcock, 1899 Thiidae Dana, 1852 Superfamily Portunoidea Rafinesque, 1815 Family Geryonidae Colosi, 1923 Portunidae Rafinesque, 1815 74 Contributions in Science, Number 39 Classification of Recent Crustacea
Trichodactylidae Milne Edwards, 1853 Superfamily Bythograeoidea Williams, 1980 Family Bythograeidae Williams, 1980 Superfamily Xanthoidea MacLeay, 1838 Family Carpiliidae Ortmann, 1893 Eumedonidae Dana, 1853 Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 Hexapodidae Miers, 1886 Menippidae Ortmann, 1893 Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893 Pilumnidae Samouelle, 1819 Platyxanthidae Guinot, 1977 Pseudorhombilidae Alcock, 1900 Trapeziidae Miers, 1886 Xanthidae MacLeay, 1838 Superfamily Bellioidea Dana, 1852 Family Belliidae Dana, 1852 Superfamily Potamoidea Ortmann, 1896 Family Deckeniidae Ortmann, 1897 Platythelphusidae Colosi, 1920 Potamidae Ortmann, 1896 Potamonautidae Bott, 1970 Superfamily Pseudothelphusoidea Ortmann, 1893 Family Pseudothelphusidae Ortmann, 1893 Superfamily Gecarcinucoidea Rathbun, 1904 Family Gecarcinucidae Rathbun, 1904 Parathelphusidae Alcock, 1910 Superfamily Cryptochiroidea Paulson, 1875 Family Cryptochiridae Paulson, 1875 Subsection Thoracotremata Guinot, 1977 Superfamily Pinnotheroidea de Haan, 1833 Family Pinnotheridae de Haan, 1833 Superfamily Ocypodoidea Rafinesque, 1815 Family Camptandriidae Stimpson, 1858 Mictyridae Dana, 1851 Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 Palicidae Bouvier, 1898 Superfamily Grapsoidea MacLeay, 1838 Family Gecarcinidae MacLeay, 1838 Glyptograpsidae Schubart, Cuesta & Felder, 2001 Grapsidae MacLeay, 1838 Plagusiidae Dana, 1851 Sesarmidae Dana, 1851 Varunidae Milne Edwards, 1853 Contributions in Science, Number 39 Classification of Recent Crustacea 75
Page 1 and 2:
An Updated Classification of the Re
Page 3 and 4:
Cover Illustration: Lepidurus packa
Page 5 and 6:
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE N
Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We sincerely thank
Page 9 and 10:
An Updated Classification of the Re
Page 11 and 12:
did not want to attempt it. We are
Page 13 and 14:
ored to credit the person or person
Page 15 and 16:
and Boxshall (1996, lichomolgoid co
Page 17 and 18:
animal phyla.’’ For the Crustac
Page 19 and 20:
same persons to comment on the resu
Page 21 and 22:
solved (e.g., Regier and Schultz, 1
Page 23 and 24:
ancestral crustacean is of course n
Page 25 and 26:
fication (see also Negrea et al., 1
Page 27 and 28:
Bowman and Abele in not recognizing
Page 29 and 30:
(Müller and Walossek, 1985), the O
Page 31 and 32: cerning barnacle evolution (Schram
Page 33 and 34: parasites of early fish-like verteb
Page 35 and 36: Boxshall and Jaume (2000, see also
Page 37 and 38: that reduction in body segmentation
Page 39 and 40: for a rebuttal of Dahl’s criticis
Page 41 and 42: the Amphipoda are deserving of stat
Page 43 and 44: er than Mysida Boas or Mysida Dana)
Page 45 and 46: tained in our classification, altho
Page 47 and 48: and Dalens (1999) in that we includ
Page 49 and 50: subfamilies of the Cryptoniscidae,
Page 51 and 52: Brusca and Brusca, 1990; Mayrat and
Page 53 and 54: employed recently by Pérez Farfant
Page 55 and 56: the former thaumastochelids being t
Page 57 and 58: Cunningham (1999) data, which sugge
Page 59 and 60: eventually led us to keep dromiids
Page 61 and 62: that the trichodactylids may repres
Page 63 and 64: (1996a-c), Rodríguez (1982, 1986,
Page 65 and 66: CONCLUDING REMARKS We have thorough
Page 67 and 68: Order Pygophora Berndt, 1907 Family
Page 69 and 70: Pseudocyclopiidae Sars, 1902 Pseudo
Page 71 and 72: Nucellicolidae Lamb, Boxshall, Mill
Page 73 and 74: Terrestricytheridae Schornikov, 196
Page 75 and 76: Eusiridae Stebbing, 1888 Exoedicero
Page 77 and 78: Parascelidae Bate, 1862 Platyscelid
Page 79 and 80: Superfamily Oniscoidea Latreille, 1
Page 81: Family Alpheidae Rafinesque, 1815 B
Page 85 and 86: H.-E. Gruner and L. B. Holthuis, 1-
Page 87 and 88: zil, ed. P. S. Young, 635-644. Rio
Page 89 and 90: mated from nuclear and mitochondria
Page 91 and 92: tacés Péracarides. Memoires de l
Page 93 and 94: netic reconstruction from 12S rDNA
Page 95 and 96: pepods and an analysis of the phylo
Page 97 and 98: among gammaridean families and amph
Page 99 and 100: es and consequences. In Proceedings
Page 101 and 102: tostraca) form Unguja Island (Zanzi
Page 103 and 104: Saint Laurent, M. de. 1979. Vers un
Page 105 and 106: . 1983a. Evolution of Tanaidacea. I
Page 107 and 108: Lysianassoidea. Journal of Natural
Page 109 and 110: Wills, M. A. 1997. A phylogeny of r
Page 111 and 112: what your sentence says. Second, ju
Page 113 and 114: logeny and taxonomy. This focus on
Page 115 and 116: Submitted by Roger L. Kaesler, Pale
Page 117 and 118: Bousfield, E. L. 1996. A contributi
Page 119 and 120: knowledge on the phylogeny and the
Page 121 and 122: inoidea is difficult, because they
Page 123 and 124: APPENDIX III. OTHER CRUSTACEAN RESO
Page 125 and 126: (The) Stomatopod Newsletter Editors
Page 127 and 128: links to crustacean societies, cons
Page 129 and 130: (The) Lurker’s Guide to Stomatopo
Page 131 and 132: strategies, and phylogeny, especial
show all

An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?