Agenda Packet - City of Jurupa Valley

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less
Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) According to GE002236, the potential for subsidence is low. The project will have less than
significant impact.
Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required.
Monitoring: No monitoring measures are required.
16. Other Geologic Hazards
a) Be subject to geologic hazards, such as seiche,
mudflow, or volcanic hazard?
o o o
Source: Project Application Materials, County Geologist review
a) No information is provided to suggest that the project site is subject to any further geological
hazard such as seiche, mudflow, or volcanic hazard.
Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required.
Monitoring: No monitoring measures are required.
17. Slopes
a) Change topography or ground surface relief
features?
b) Create cut or fill slopes greater than 2:1 or higher
than 10 feet?
c) Result in grading that affects or negates subsurface
sewage disposal systems?
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
[gI
[gI
Source: Project Application Materials, Building and Safety - Grading Review
Findings of Fact:
a-c) Standard conditions of approval have been added stating that a grading permit is required prior to
construction grading. These conditions are not considered unique mitigation and are not required for
CEQA implementation purposes. The project will have no impact.
Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required.
Monitoring: No monitoring measures are required.
18. Soils
a) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
b) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Section
1802.3.2 of the California Building Code (2007), creating
Page 15 of 35 EA No. 42367
0 0 0
0 0 [gI 0