Agenda Packet - City of Jurupa Valley

PLOT PLAN NO. 24678
DH Staff Report: June 20, 2011
Page 3 of 4
6. The proposed use, a wireless communications facility disguised as a 60 foot high palm tree, is a
permitted use in the C-P-S zone subject to approval of a plot plan according to the provisions of
Ordinance No. 348, Article XIXg (Wireless Communication Facilities.)
7. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, does not exceed the maximum allowable
height of 70 feet for wireless telecommunication facilities in non-residential zones. Additionally,
the facility is set back approximately 530 feet from habitable dwellings within adjacent nonresidentially
zoned properties, which exceeds the 75 foot setback requirement (125% of facility
height); and is set back approximately 180 feet from habitable dwelling within adjacent
residentially zoned properties, which exceed the 120 foot setback requirement (200% of facility
height). The project contains no natural landscape so the Area Disturbance development
standard is not applicable.
The project, as designed and conditions, comply with the
development standards for Fencing and Walls, Landscaping, Noise, Parking, Power and
Communications Lines, as well as Support Facilities and Treatment.
Therefore it can be
determined that the project is consistent with the development standards set forth in Ordinance
No. 348, Article XIXg (Wireless Communication Facilities.)
8. The project site is surrounded by properties which are zoned Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P­
S) to the north and south, Light Agriculture (A-1) to the east, and Residential Agricultural (R-A) to
the west.
9. The project is not located within Criteria Area of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (WRCMSHCP).
10. Environmental Assessment No. 42367 identified the following potentially significant impacts:
a) Aesthetics b) Cultural Resources
These listed impacts will be fully mitigated by the measures indicated in the environmental
assessment, conditions of approval, and attached letters.
No other significant impacts were
identified.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
1. As of this writing, no letters, in support or opposition have been received.
2. The project site is not located within:
a. A City of Sphere of Influence;
b. An Airport Influence Area;
c. An Agriculture Preserve;
d. A High Fire area;
e. A Fault Zone;
f. A Flood Zone; or,
g. The Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Fee Area
3. The project site is located within:
a. The Equestrian Sphere Policy Area;