slides - corpora@parles.upf - Universitat Pompeu Fabra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 The Theoretical Framework Borer’s (forthcoming) XS model is taken in this research. The following points are relevant to our purpose: 2.1 The function of C(ategorial)-functors Lexical items are only phonological indices with no categorial features (thus are “roots”), and the C-functor plays the role of providing categories to the roots. The root can take categories via two ways. The first way is to take a C-functor. For example, beautiful is an adjective due to its C A -functor “ful”.
2 The Theoretical Framework The second way is to resort to the Category Complement Set (CCS). A C-functor projects a syntactic node, which divides a categorial space (CCS). A root will get a corresponding categorial value due to the CCS determined by the C-functor. For example, the C- functor ING will on the one hand project a N node, which means that the output of the syntactic computation from this projection will take a N category, and also, it will define a V type CCS, which basically means that the item put in the CCS takes a V category.
Page 1 and 2: A Parametric Account of Chinese and
Page 3 and 4: 1 Chinese Syn-Compounds: Data & Iss
Page 5: 1 Chinese Syn-Compounds: Data & Iss
Page 9 and 10: 2 The Theoretical Framework 2.2 On
Page 11 and 12: 3.1 The N-V type This predicts that
Page 13 and 14: 3.1 The N-V type Another issue is t
Page 15 and 16: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound (12) A t
Page 17 and 18: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound The para
Page 19 and 20: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound The new
Page 21 and 22: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound Why are
Page 23: References Ackema, P. & A. Neeleman

slides - corpora@parles.upf - Universitat Pompeu Fabra

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?